RESEARCH RESULT

1. Univariate Analysis

Variable Frequency Percentage

Age 50.45±11.29
BMI 25.49±3.95
Hypertension Hypertension 11 19.6
Non
Hypertension 45 80.4
Smoker Not 56 100
Yes 0 0
DM history Not 50 89.3
Yes 6 10.7
Physical Activity Not 39 69.6
1 time/week 2 3.6
2 times/week 6 10.7
3 times/week 5 8.9
4 times/week 1 1.8
5 times/week 1 1.8
6 times/week 2 3.6
Coronary Calcium Score (CAS) No 31 55.4
Mild 9 16.1
Minimum 11 19.6
Moderate 4 7.1
severe 1 1.8
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score
(JAKVAS) Low 18 32.1
Medium 18 32.1
  High 20 35.7

2. Bivariate Analysis (Relationship of Variables with JCS Stratification)

Hypothesis :
Ho = There is no relationship between two variables
Hi = There is a relationship between two variables

Basis of decision making based on probability (p value)

 If probability/p value > 0.05 then Ho is accepted
 If probability/p value < 0.05 then Ho is rejected

From the results of calculations with the SPSS program, the results are
shown in the following table.
 Variable Relationship with JCS Stratification

Variable   JCS Stratification P-value Decision

Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk
    n=18 n=18 n=20    
Age   38.17 ± 5 51.28±7.51 60.75 ± 6.38 < 0.001 Significantly related
BMI   24.51 ± 3.98 25.32±4.49 26.53 ± 3.29 0.286 Not significantly related
Hypertension Hypertension 3 (5.40%) 3 (5.40%) 5 (8.90%) 0.754 Not significantly related
Non
  Hypertension 15 (26.80%) 15 (26.80%) 15 (26.80%)    
Smoker Yes 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) -  
Not 18 (32.10%) 18 (32.10%) 20 (35.70%)
DM history Yes 0 (0.00%) 2 (3.60%) 4 (7.10%)
Not 18 (32.10%) 16 (28.60%) 16 (28.60%) 0.138 Not significantly related
Physical Activity 1 time/week 2 (3.60%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0.551 Not significantly related
2 times/week 2 (3.60%) 2 (3.60%) 2 (3.60%)
3 times/week 1 (1.80%) 1 (1.80%) 3 (5.40%)
4 times/week 1 (1.80%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
5 times/week 0 (0.00%) 1 (1.80%) 0 (0.00%)
6 times/week 0 (0.00%) 1 (1.80%) 1 (1.80%)
  Not 12 (21.40%) 13 (23.20%) 14 (25.00%)    
Coronary Calcium Sco Mild 0 (0.00%) 3 (5.40%) 6 (10.70%) < 0.001 Significantly related
re (CAS)
Minimum 1 (1.80%) 3 (5.40%) 7 (12.50%)
Moderate 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (7.10%)
Severe 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
No 17 (30.40%) 12 (21.40%) 2 (3.60%)

 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
age variable is 0.000 < 0.05, so Ho is rejected and Hi is accepted . This means
that there is a significant relationship between the variables of age and JCS
Stratification. The higher the age, the higher the JCS stratification.
 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
BMI variable is 0.286 > 0.05, so Ho is accepted and Hi is rejected . This
means that there is no significant relationship between BMI and JCS
Stratification variables.
 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
Hypertension variable is 0.754 > 0.05, so Ho is accepted and Hi is rejected .
This means that there is no significant relationship between the variables of
Hypertension and JCS Stratification.
 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
Smoker variable is non-existent, because all samples do not smoke, then Ho is
accepted and Hi is rejected . This means that there is no significant
relationship between the smoker variable and the JCS Stratification.
 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
DM history variable is 0.138 > 0.05, so Ho is accepted and Hi is rejected .
This means that there is no significant relationship between the variables of
DM history and JCS stratification.
 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
Physical Activity variable is 0.551 > 0.05, so Ho is accepted and Hi is rejected
. This means that there is no significant relationship between the variables of
Physical Activity and JCS Stratification.
 From the table above, it is known that the probability value (p value) of the
Calcium Score Stratification variable is 0.000 <0.05, so Ho is rejected and Hi
is accepted . This means that there is a significant relationship between the
Calcium Score Stratification and JCS Stratification variables.
Appendix 1. Univariate Analysis

Frequencies

Statistics
Jakarta
Coronary Calci Cardiovascular
Physical um Score Score
Ages Hypertension BMI Smoker DM history Activity (CAS) (JAKVAS)
N Valid 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 50.4464 25.4923
Std. Deviation 11.28784 3.94869

Frequency Table

Hypertension

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Hypertension 11 19.6 19.6 19.6
Non Hypertensi 45 80.4 80.4 100.0
Total 56 100.0 100.0

Smoker

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Not 56 100.0 100.0 100.0

DM history

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Not 50 89.3 89.3 89.3
Yes 6 10.7 10.7 100.0
Total 56 100.0 100.0

Physical Activity

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 time/week 2 3.6 3.6 3.6
2 times/week 6 10.7 10.7 14.3
3 times/week 5 8.9 8.9 23.2
4 times/week 1 1.8 1.8 25.0
5 times/week 1 1.8 1.8 26.8
6 times/week 2 3.6 3.6 30.4
Not 39 69.6 69.6 100.0
Total 56 100.0 100.0
 Coronary Calcium Score (CAS)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Mild 9 16.1 16.1 16.1
Minimal 11 19.6 19.6 35.7
Moderate 4 7.1 7.1 42.9
No 31 55.4 55.4 98.2
Severe 1 1.8 1.8 100.0
Total 56 100.0 100.0

Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid High 20 35.7 35.7 35.7
Low 18 32.1 32.1 67.9
Medium 18 32.1 32.1 100.0
Total 56 100.0 100.0
Appendix 2. Bivariate Analysis

Oneway

Descriptives
95% Confidence Interval for Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum
Ages Low 18 38.1667 4.99706 1.17782 35.6817 40.6516 27.00 43.00
Medium 18 51.2778 7.51317 1.77087 47.5416 55.0140 41.00 65.00
High 20 60.7500 6.38151 1.42695 57.7634 63.7366 51.00 78.00
Total 56 50.4464 11.28784 1.50840 47.4235 53.4693 27.00 78.00
BMI Low 18 24.5111 3.97727 .93745 22.5333 26.4890 20.70 33.30
Medium 18 25.3167 4.49081 1.05849 23.0834 27.5499 19.10 39.10

High 20 26.5335 3.29464 .73670 24.9916 28.0754 20.30 31.60

Total 56 25.4923 3.94869 .52767 24.4349 26.5498 19.10 39.10

ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Ages Between Groups 4849.978 2 2424.989 59.561 .000
Within Groups 2157.861 53 40.714
Total 7007.839 55
BMI Between Groups 39.566 2 19.783 1.282 .286
Within Groups 818.001 53 15.434

Total 857.568 55
Means Plots
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Hypertension * Jakarta Cardiovascular 56 100.0% 0 0.0% 56 100.0%
Score (JAKVAS)
Smoker * Jakarta Cardiovascular Score 56 100.0% 0 0.0% 56 100.0%
(JAKVAS)
DM history * Jakarta Cardiovascular 56 100.0% 0 0.0% 56 100.0%
Score (JAKVAS)
Physical Activity * Jakarta 56 100.0% 0 0.0% 56 100.0%
Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)
Coronary Calcium Score (CAS) * 56 100.0% 0 0.0% 56 100.0%
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score
(JAKVAS)

Hypertension * Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Crosstab
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Low Medium High Total

Hypertension Hypertension Count 3 3 5 11
% of Total 5.4% 5.4% 8.9% 19.6%
Non Hypertensi Count 15 15 15 45
% of Total 26.8% 26.8% 26.8% 80.4%
Total Count 18 18 20 56
% of Total 32.1% 32.1% 35.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .566a 2 .754
Likelihood Ratio .552 2 .759
N of Valid Cases 56

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.54.
Smoker * Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Crosstab
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)
Low Medium High Total
Smoker Not Count 18 18 20 56
% of Total 32.1% 32.1% 35.7% 100.0%
Total Count 18 18 20 56
% of Total 32.1% 32.1% 35.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 56
a. No statistics are computed because Smoker is a
constant.
DM history * Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Crosstab
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)
Low Medium High Total
DM history Not Count 18 16 16 50
% of Total 32.1% 28.6% 28.6% 89.3%
Yes Count 0 2 4 6
% of Total 0.0% 3.6% 7.1% 10.7%
Total Count 18 18 20 56
% of Total 32.1% 32.1% 35.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.966a 2 .138
Likelihood Ratio 5.562 2 .062
N of Valid Cases 56

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.93.
Physical Activity * Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Crosstab
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Low Medium High Total

Physical Activity 1 time/week Count 2 0 0 2
% of Total 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6%
2 times/week Count 2 2 2 6
% of Total 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 10.7%
3 times/week Count 1 1 3 5
% of Total 1.8% 1.8% 5.4% 8.9%
4 times/week Count 1 0 0 1
% of Total 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8%
5 times/week Count 0 1 0 1
% of Total 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 1.8%
6 times/week Count 0 1 1 2
% of Total 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 3.6%
Not Count 12 13 14 39
% of Total 21.4% 23.2% 25.0% 69.6%
Total Count 18 18 20 56
% of Total 32.1% 32.1% 35.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.740a 12 .551
Likelihood Ratio 11.907 12 .453
N of Valid Cases 56

a. 18 cells (85.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .32.

Coronary Calcium Score (CAS) * Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Crosstab
Jakarta Cardiovascular Score (JAKVAS)

Low Medium High Total

Coronary Calcium Score (CAS) Mild Count 0 3 6 9
% of Total 0.0% 5.4% 10.7% 16.1%
Minimal Count 1 3 7 11
% of Total 1.8% 5.4% 12.5% 19.6%
Moderate Count 0 0 4 4
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% 7.1%
No Count 17 12 2 31
% of Total 30.4% 21.4% 3.6% 55.4%
Severe Count 0 0 1 1
% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 1.8%
Total Count 18 18 20 56
% of Total 32.1% 32.1% 35.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 31.429a 8 .000
Likelihood Ratio 38.359 8 .000
N of Valid Cases 56

a. 12 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .32.