Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indian Constitution and Media Law
Indian Constitution and Media Law
Constitution of India
As you might know, the Constitution of India lays down an important framework that demarcates the
structure of the political system, powers, and duties of government institutions and gives the people
their fundamental rights and duties towards the country. The main aim of the constitution is to protect
the fundamental rights of the people. On 26 November 1949, the constitution was adopted by the
Constituent Assembly of India. Although it came into effect on 26 January 1950.
Since the constitution was created by the constituent assembly it communicates constitutional
supremacy rather than parliamentary supremacy. The Constitution of India from start to end is made
by the Indians only. It replaces the Government of India Act 1935 and functions as the country’s
fundamental governing document.
The constitution declares India a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. It ensures
that all the citizens of this country will get equality, liberty and justice.
It took the committee three years to draft the constitution, holding eleven sessions over 165 days.
This is because India is a big country with so many cultures and religions. The committee wanted to
make sure that they make a constitution that leads the country to success.
The Preamble declares India ‘sovereign’ which means the country is an independent authority and it
is not a dominion of any other external power. It also says that India is ‘secular’ which means that all
the citizens have the right to practise their religion. The introductory document further says that India
embraces social and economic democracy.
It provides every Indian with equality of status and opportunity. According to the Preamble, every
citizen must promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood. Most importantly, it states that
the country is ‘democratic’ which means that the citizens have the right to choose the members of
the government.
Visit to know more about How to Prepare for UPSC without Coaching
Fundamental Rights
The constitution gives every citizen 6 fundamental rights. These are as follows:
Right to Equality
Right to equality means every citizen will get equal rights in every field irrespective of their colour,
caste, religion and gender. It ensures that everyone will get equal job opportunities and citizens
shouldn’t follow orthodox practices such as untouchability and give equal respect to everyone.
Right to Freedom
India is a democratic country where the constitution guarantees freedom to every Indian. Under this
several rights are given such as:
• Freedom of speech
• Freedom of expression
• Freedom to reside in any part of the country
• Freedom of association
• Freedom of assembly without arms
• Freedom to practise any profession
Conclusion
As you can see the drafting committee has paid attention to minor details to make sure that they
make a constitution that gives the citizens every right possible and makes India a powerful country.
The Constitution of India embraces the principles of equality, liberty and fraternity. It tells the Indians
to spread harmony and respect everyone. The government must provide equal opportunities to
everyone and make sure that everyone gets justice.
Right to Equality
• Article 14 of the Constitution of India declares that the state will not
deny anybody equality before the law or equal protection of the laws
within the territory of India. This right is conferred on everyone
including foreigners and even legal persons, such as a corporation or a
company.
• This concept of ‘equality before the law’ is of British origin while the
concept of ‘equal protection of laws’ is of American origin (it has been
taken from the American Constitution).
• Article 15 of the Constitution of India declares that the state will not
discriminate against any citizen of India on the grounds of religion,
caste, sex or their place of birth.
• Article 16 of the Constitution of India declares the equality of
opportunity for the Indian citizens in the matters which involve
employment or appointment to any office under the state. Hence, no
citizen of India shall be discriminated against or be declared ineligible
for any employment under the state on the grounds of religion, caste,
place of birth, or gender.
• Article 17 of the Constitution of India abolishes the concept of
‘Untouchability’ and prohibits its practice in any shape or form.
• Article 18 of the Constitution of India abolishes the concept of ‘Titles’
and declares that:
o No title (except for military and academic titles) shall be
conferred by the State.
o Citizens of India are prohibited from accepting any title from
any foreign State.
o No foreign individual (while he holds any office of profit or
trust under the State) can accept any office from any foreign
state without the consent of the President of India, any title
from any foreign state.
o No Indian Citizen or foreigner who is holding an office of profit
or trust under the state can accept any present or office from
or under any foreign State without the consent of the
President of India.
Right to Freedom
• Article 19 of the Constitution of India guarantees six rights to all the
Indian citizens, these rights defined under this Article are:
Right to practice any kind of profession or any occupation, trade, or business (Article 19(1)(g)).
No ex-post-facto law
No double jeopardy
No self-incrimination
Executive Powers
• All executive actions of a state's administration are legally taken in the name of
Governor.
• He can create regulations governing how Orders and other instruments produced
and executed in his name are verified.
• He appoints the leader of the majority party in the State Legislative Assembly as
the Chief Minister of the State.
• He appoints other members of the Council of Ministers on the recommendation
of the Chief Minister.
• He should appoint a Tribal Welfare Minister in the states of Chattisgarh,
Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha. The 94th Amendment Act of 2006
exempted the state of Bihar from this provision.
• He acts as the chancellor of universities in the state. He also appoints the vice-
chancellors of universities in the state.
• He appoints the advocate general of a state, state election commissioner and
chairman and members of the state public service commission.
• He directly rules a State when there is the imposition of the President’s rule in the
State.
• He may ask the chief minister to bring to the council of ministers any topic on
which a minister has made a decision but which has not been reviewed by the
council.
• He has the authority to propose to the president the declaration of a state of
constitutional emergency.
• As an agent of the President, the governor has considerable administrative
powers in a state during the President's reign.
Legislative Powers
Legislative Powers
• Under Article 175 Right of the Governor to address and send messages to the
house or houses of the state legislature.
• Under Article 213 he can promulgate ordinances when the state legislature is not
in session. These ordinances must be approved by the state legislature within six
weeks from its reassembly.
• Every bill passed by the state legislature will become law only after his signature.
But, when a bill is sent to the Governor after it is passed by the legislature, he
has the option to give his assent to the bill or withhold his assent to the bill or
return the bill for the reconsideration of the legislature.
• When the offices of Speaker and Deputy Speaker become empty, he has the
authority to designate any member of the State legislative assembly to preside
over its operations.
• Similarly, he can select any member of the state legislature council to preside
over its operations if both the Chairman and Deputy Chairman positions become
vacant.
• He nominates one-sixth of the state legislative council members from among
those with specific expertise or practical experience in literature, science, art,
cooperative movement, and social service.
• He can nominate one member to the State Legislative Assembly from the Anglo-
Indian Community.
• In consultation with the Election Commission, he makes decisions on the
disqualification of members of the state legislature.
• He presents to the state legislature the reports of the State Finance Commission,
the State Public Service Commission, and the Comptroller and Auditor-General
concerning the state's accounts.
Financial Powers
Financial Powers
The governor's financial authorities and functions are as follows:
• He ensures that the Annual Financial Statement (state budget) is presented to
the state legislature.
• Only with his previous approval may money legislation be submitted in the state
legislature.
• No grant request may be filed unless he recommends it.
• He can make loans from the state's contingency fund to cover any unanticipated
expenses.
• Every five years, he appoints a finance commission to assess the financial
situation of the panchayats and municipalities.
Judicial Powers
Judicial Powers
The governor has the following judicial powers and functions:
• If no party obtains an absolute majority, the Governor may choose the Chief
Minister at his discretion.
• During an emergency, he has the authority to disregard the recommendations of
the ministerial council. In such situations, he functions as the President's
representative and becomes the true ruler of the state.
• He utilizes his authority to give a report to the President on the state's affairs.
• He might refuse to sign a measure and instead refer it to the President for
approval.
Que4: What do you understand by censorship? Describe.
Or
Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be
done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or
"inconvenient”. Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other
controlling bodies.
Types
Political
State secrets and prevention of attention
Religion
Educational sources
Economic induced censorship
Self-censorship
Copy, picture, and writer approval
Reverse censorship
By media
Books
Films
Music
Maps
Art
Internet
Social media
Video games
India
Main article: Censorship in India
The Constitution of India guarantees freedom of expression, but places certain restrictions on
content, with a view towards maintaining communal and religious harmony, given the history of
communal tension in the nation. According to the Information Technology Rules 2011, objectionable
content includes anything that "threatens the unity, integrity, defense, security or sovereignty of
India, friendly relations with foreign states or public order".
Qualifications of Members
Article 173 of the Indian Constitution specifies the requirements for
membership. They are:
• A person must be an Indian citizen.
• A member of the Legislative Assembly must be over the age of 25.
• A person must be above 30 years old to be a member of the Legislative
Council.
• he or she should be a registered voter in one of the state’s constituencies.
Disqualifications of Members
The disqualification of members of the Legislature is addressed in Article 191.
The following grounds can be used to disqualify an MLA or MLC:
• If one occupies a profit-making position in the state or central government.
• If a competent court declares someone to be of unsound mind.
• If you’re an undischarged insolvent.
• When a person is no longer a citizen of the nation or when he or she has
willingly adopted the citizenship of another country.
• If the law of the Parliament disqualifies one.
A contempt order may address behavior both in the courtroom and outside it,
including public displays of disrespect toward the court. In short, risk being
found in contempt of court if you act in a way that is disruptive, disrespectful,
or that threatens the fair verdict or outcome of a case.
Categories of Contempt
Contempt of court refers to any behavior of an individual that defies or opposes the authority or
dignity of the court. Contempt of court charges may be leveled against any party to a court
proceeding, their lawyers, witnesses, jurors, court officers or personnel, and even non-involved
individuals, such as protesters outside a trial. Contempt charges may be civil or criminal, and the
court has a great deal of leeway in charging people with contempt.
Acts of contempt may generally be divided into certain categories of contempt:
1. Criminal Contempt: being rude or disrespectful to court proceedings,
the judge, or attorneys in the proceedings, or causing some type of
disturbance in the courtroom. This type of behavior usually garners a
warning by the judge before contempt charges are made.
2. Civil Contempt: willfully or purposely failing to obey an order of the court.
This often involves refusal to pay child support, failing to abide by a child
custody order, refusing to hand over property when ordered by the court, or
failing to show up for a hearing in court.
3. Direct Contempt: an action taken in the presence of the court, which is
intended to cause embarrassment or show disrespect for the court. Direct
contempt may include the refusal by a witness under oath
to answer questions of the judge or an attorney, or shouting in the courtroom
.
4. Indirect Contempt: actions taken away from the court, which are intended to
mock, degrade, or obstruct the court or court proceedings. Attempting to
bribe an attorney or witness, or attempting to sway members of the jury are
considered indirect acts of indirect contempt. In addition, publishing or
handing out flyers intended to cause disrespect for the court may be
considered an act of indirect contempt.
Since the state is organized and the government is established for the welfare
of the citizen, it becomes essential that we should know the meaning of the
term “citizen”. The term ‘citizen’ can be understood in a narrow or in a broad
sense. In a narrow sense, it means the resident of a city or one who enjoys
the privilege of living m a city. While in a broad sense citizen means a person
who resides within the territorial limits of the state.
(a) Ombudsman
Ombudsmen sometimes also aim to identify systemic issues leading to poor service or breaches of
people's rights. At the national level, most ombudsmen have a wide mandate to deal with the entire
public sector, and sometimes also elements of the private sector (for example, contracted service
providers). In some cases, there is a more restricted mandate, for example with particular sectors of
society. More recent developments have included the creation of specialized children's ombudsmen.
In some countries, an inspector general, citizen advocate or other official may have duties similar to
those of a national ombudsman and may also be appointed by a legislature. Below the national
level, an ombudsman may be appointed by a state, local, or municipal government. Unofficial
ombudsmen may be appointed by, or even work for, a corporation such as a utility supplier,
newspaper, NGO, or professional regulatory body.
India[edit]
The Government of India has designated several ombudsmen (sometimes called Chief Vigilance
Officer (CVO)) for the redress of grievances and complaints from individuals in the banking,
insurance and other sectors being serviced by both private and public bodies and
corporations.[78] The CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) was set up on the recommendation of the
Santhanam Committee (1962–64).
Lokpal[edit]
Main article: Lokpal
In India, the Ombudsman is known as the Lokpal or Lokayukta. An Administrative Reforms
Commission (ARC) was set up on 5 January 1966 under the Chairmanship of Shri Morarji Desai. It
recommended a two-tier machinery: Lokpal at the Centre (parliamentary commissioner, as in New
Zealand) and one Lokayukta each at the State level for redress of people's grievances. However, the
jurisdiction of the Lokpal did not extend to the judiciary (as in case of New Zealand). The central
Government introduced the first Lokpal Bill, Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill in 1968, and further
legislation was introduced in 2005. Final bill, after all the amendments, has been passed in Rajya
Sabha on 17 December 2013 and passed in Loksabha on 18 December 2013.[79]
Lokayukta
Main article: Lokayukta
The state-level Lokayukta institution has developed gradually. Orissa was the first state to present a
bill on establishment of Lokayukta in 1970, but Maharashtra was the first to establish the institution,
in 1972. Other states followed: Bihar (1974), Uttar Pradesh (1977), Madhya Pradesh (1981), Andhra
Pradesh (1983), Himachal
Pradesh (1983), Karnataka (1984), Assam (1986), Gujarat (1988), Delhi (1995), Punjab (1996), Kera
la (1998), Chhattishgarh (2002), Uttaranchal (2002), West Bengal (2003) and Haryana (2004). The
structure of the Lokayukta is not uniform across all the states. Some states
have UpaLokayukta under the Lokayukta and in some states, the Lokayukta does not have suo
moto powers of instigating an enquiry.
Kerala State has an Ombudsman for Local Self Government institutions like Panchayats,
Municipalities and Corporations.[80] The ombudsman can enquire/investigate into allegations of
action, inaction, corruption and maladministration. A retired Judge of the High Court is appointed by
the Governor for a term of three years, under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act.
In the State of Rajasthan, the Lokayukta institution was established in 1973 after the Rajasthan
Lokayukta and Up-Lokayuktas Act, 1973 was passed by the State Legislature.
Non-banking financial companies
The Reserve Bank of India launched an "Ombudsman Scheme" for redress of complaints
against non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) free of charge.[81]
This scheme is applicable to only those NBFCs which:
• If the NBFC does not reply within a period of one month after receipt of the complaint;
• If the complainant is not satisfied with the reply given by the NBFC;
• If the NBFC rejects, or does not acknowledge the complaint.
Anti-corruption movements[edit]
See also: 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement and 2012 Indian anti-corruption movement
The 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement led by social activist Anna Hazare and Arvind
Kejriwal includes in its demands the creation of a stronger ombudsman agency (with jurisdiction over
all state institutions) through the enactment of a Jan Lokpal Bill, as an alternative to the Lokpal Bill
proposed by the government in 2010.
1. The objective of Press Council of India is to preserve the freedom of the press and of
maintaining and improving the standards of the press in India
2. It acts as the regulator that defines and discharge professional standards for the print media
in India.
3. It is considered as the most important body that sustains democracy and to ensure that
freedom of speech is protected.
4. It arbitrates the complaints against and by the press for violation of ethics and for violation of
the freedom of the press respectively.
1. It only has the power to enforce standards on the print media and has no powers to enforce
standards on the Electronic media. Radio, television, internet comes under electronic media.
Journals, magazines, newspapers etc come under the category of print media.
2. While enforcing the issued guidelines, it has very limited powers. It cannot penalize anyone
for violation of the guidelines.