Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

PEOPLE V. LINSANGAN (ABAD SANTOS, J.

:)
-Ambrosio Linsangan was prosecuted for non-payment of the cedula or poll tax under section 1439, in connection with
section 2718, of the Revised Administrative Code.
-After due trial, he was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for 5 days, and to pay the costs.
-he appealed, alleging that the trial court erred in not declaring said sections 1439 and 2718 of the Revised Administrative
Code unconstitutional and void. Section 1439 specifies the persons required to pay the cedula tax, and the pertinent part ot
section 2718 which provides that a person liable to the cedula tax who fails to pay the same for 15 days after June 1 of
each year, shall be deemed guilty of misdemeanour and upon conviction, he shall be sentenced to 5days imprisonment.
-This case was tried and decided in the lower court before the Constitution of the Philippines took effect. But while the
appeal was pending, the Constitution became effective, and, sec.1, clause 12, of Article III thereof provides that "no
person shall be imprisoned for debt or nonpayment of a poll tax."
-while our previous organic law provided that no person should be imprisoned for debt, it contained no express provision
against imprisonment for non-payment of a poll or cedula tax;
-counsel for the appellant avers that the judgment of convection violates the provision of the Philippine Autonomy Act
interdicting imprisonment for debt.

Brief history of the Constitution (1935) -By the Act of Congress --the Tydings-McDuffie Law, the people of the
Philippines were authorized to adopt a constitution. [steps: 1st- drafting and approval by the constitutional convention authorized
to be called under the Act; 2nd - certification by the President of the US that the constitution so drafted and approved conformed with
the provisions of the same Act; 3rd - ratification by the people of the Philippines at an election or plebiscite called for the purpose of
ratifying or rejecting the same. ]

-July 30, 1934 – drafting of the constitution


-Feb. 8, 1935 – approval of the draft
-Mar. 18, 1935 – submitted to the US Pres.
-Mar. 23, 1935 - the President certified that the constitution
-May 14, 1935 –ratification by the people.

ISSUE: whether, in view of Section 1, clause 12, of Article III of the Constitution, the judgment of conviction can stand?

HELD: Judgment is reversed. Sec. 2718 of the Revised Administrative Code is inconsistent with section 1, clause 12, of
Article III of the Constitution, in that, while the former authorizes imprisonment for nonpayment of the poll or cedula tax,
the latter forbids it. It follows that upon the inauguration of the Government of the Commonwealth, said section 2718 of
the Revised Administrative Code became inoperative, and no judgment of conviction can be based thereon.

-Our Constitution is modelled after the Constitution the US. [characterized by William Pitt as "the wonder and admiration of all
future generations and the model for all future constitutions," and by Gladstone as "the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given
time by the brain and purpose of men."]

section 2 of Article XV of the Constitution, provides: All laws of the Philippine Islands shall continue in force until the
inauguration of the Commonwealth of the Philippines; thereafter, such laws shall remain operative, unless inconsistent
with this Constitution, until amended, altered, modified, or repealed by the National Assembly, and all references in such
laws to the Government or officials of the Philippine Islands shall be constued, in so far as applicable, to refer to the
Government and corresponding officials under this Constitution.

You might also like