1. Reference Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Gencer,E. (2020). The Diener, E., Emmons, R. A.

,
Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). Relationship between Self- Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S.
The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Esteem, Satisfaction with Life (1985). The Satisfaction With
Journal of Personality and Coach-Athlete Relationship. Life Scale. Journal of
Assessment, 49, 71-75. Journal of Educational Issues, Personality Assessment.
Vol. 6, No. 2.
2. Name Satisfaction with life scale Satisfaction with Life Scale The Satisfaction With Life
Scale
3. Abbreviation SWLS SWLS SWLS
4. Year 1985 1985 1985
5. Test developers Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Diener, Emmons, Larsen, and ED DIENER, ROBERT A.
Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. Griffin EMMONS, RANDY J.
LAR.SEM, and SHARON
GRIFFIN
6. Construct measure global cognitive measures a person’s subjective measure global life
judgments of one’s life evaluation of his or her life satisfaction
satisfaction
7. Purpose To measure how satisfied purpose of the study was to assess global life satisfaction
someone is with their life examine the relationships and does not tap related
between the self-esteem, constructs such as positive
satisfaction with life and coach- affect or loneliness
athlete relationship, and to
examine these structures
according to gender,
international/national status,
educational status, and sport
experience in an elite sport
context
8. Origin of the Two sources: No info Initial scale consisted of 48
items - The relationship self-report items. The affect
between income items were eliminated and
subjective well-being: 10 items were left. After high
Relative or absolute semantic similarity 5 items
- Review of the were drop leaving the 5 to
Satisfaction with Life become the five item scale
Scale the SWLS.
9. Subscale (if any) Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
10. Number of items 5 items 5 items 5 items
11. Number of items Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
per subscale (if
any)
12. Rating Rating scale/answer Rated on a 7 point likert scale 7 point likert scale
scale/answer scale/response option = 7 point - 1 = strongly disagree 1 =strongly disagree,
scale/response Likert-scale - 7 = strongly agree 2 = dis- agree,
option including • 7 - Strongly agree 3 = slightly disagree,
the numbering • 6 - Agree 4 = neither agree nor
and it’s legend • 5 - Slightly agree disagree,
• 4 - Neither agree nor disagree 5 =slightly agree,
• 3 - Slightly disagree 6 =agree,
• 2 - Disagree 7 =strongly agree
• 1 - Strongly disagree
13. Range of scoring 5 – 35 is the range of scoring No info NO INFO
14. Range of scoring Not applicable Not applicable NOT APPLICABLE
per subscale (if
any)
15. Reverse items Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
16. Cutting score (if  31 - 35 Extremely No info 5 (low satisfaction) to 35
any) satisfied (high satisfaction)
 26 - 30 Satisfied
 21 - 25 Slightly satisfied
 20 Neutral
 15 - 19 Slightly
dissatisfied
 10 - 14 Dissatisfied
 5 - 9 Extremely
dissatisfied
17. Interpretation of The higher score indicates the positive, significant relationship INDIVIDUAL WITH HIGHER
scoring greater someone is satisfied between the satisfaction with SCORES APPEAR THAT
with their life life and closeness to the coach INDIVIDUALS WHO
(r = 0.23, p < 0.01),

Meaning the greater the score

between 0.23 to 0.01 the more
satisfied someone is with their
life.
18. Psychometric KIV KIV KIV
properties-
validity
19. Psychometric KIV KIV KIV
properties-
reliability
20. Any specific No info The SWLS was adapted to NO INFO
details regarding Turkish by Köker (1991).
the instrument