Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2 Injection Molds
Chapter 2 Injection Molds
and Composites
Bandes vis
chauffantes
3
Mold basic requirements
3. Runner design:
- Runner balancing.
7
To be removed
from the parts
8
1. Two-Plate Cold Runner Molds:
Stationary half
Sprue bushing
Locating ring
Cavity: female part
Top clamping plate
Support plate
Ejector pin Return pin
Parallel plate
Guide pin bushing
Bottom clamping plate
9
• This is the most used design due to its simplicity, its lower
cost, and because of its easy operation and maintenance.
• This type of mold has a single parting line that opens
during each molding cycle to allow removal of both the
runner and molded parts.
• The sprue provides a passage for the melted polymer to
travel from the nozzle to the parting line. At the parting
line, the sprue connects to the primary runner, which either
feeds the melt directly to the part forming cavity (single-
cavity molds) or branches into additional runner sections,
which will feed the melt to multiple cavities (multi-cavity
molds).
• For multi-cavity molds, as the cavities and the runner are
along the same parting line, gating is limited to the cavity
perimeter.
10
Disadvantages:
• Requires the needs to separate the runner from the
molded parts.
• The runner material has to be re-grinded for possible
reuse (contamination problems).
• For multi-cavity molds: Limitation in gating location: must
be on the edge of the molded parts. This limitation can
lead to:
. Core deflection.
. Gas traps.
. Undesirable weldlines.
11
Important: Weldlines must never be situated in
critical areas, (especially for parts reinforced with
fiberglass).
12
Mold closed
Mold open
13
Opening/ejection steps
14
• For three-plate molds, the main advantage is that the
gating is not limited to the perimeter of the part cavity.
• The three-plate mold has a second parting
plane located behind the cavity plate.
• The 2nd parting plane provides for a
runner to travel under the mold cavity
to any position relative to the part cavity.
16
Hot Runner Molds
• A hot runner mold refers to a mold in which the runner
stays molten and is not ejected during the molding
cycle.
• Without a runner Þ shot size, plasticating & cooling
times decrease.
• The hot runner system is composed of two primary
components: the manifold and the drop.
1) The manifold, contained with the fixed part of the
mold (Part A), delivers the melt from the machine
nozzle to the selected positions behind the cavity
plate.
17
18
2) Hot drops then provide passage for the melt from
the manifold directly to the mold cavity.
The drop is generally positioned 90 degrees to the
manifold and travels through the cavity plate.
19
1. Externally heated Manifold with
externally heated drops
Stationary part
24
25
Content
1. Standard mold assembly
3. Runner design:
- Runner balancing.
27
Question:
What is the effect of the variation
in channel radius, R, on pressure drop ?
8Qh L
DP =
pR 4
If Q, h et L remain constants, the pressure drop,
DP, is:
k Þ DPa 1
DP = 4 4
R R
If R is increased by 40% → DP decreases by 74%
28
1. Cold runner design:
Runners are used to deliver the melt from the injection
nozzle of the molding machine, through the mold and to the
cavities.
They should satisfy the following requirements:
• The cross-sections should be large enough so that the
pressure to fill the runners is not excessive.
• The cross-sections should be as small as possible to
reduce waste and reduce the cooling time.
• Provide balanced flow to all cavities.
• Maximize the efficiency of the flow channel by minimizing
the ratio of surface area to cross-sectional area. This is
best achieved with a full round runner channel. 29
Bad conception
pressure drop
30
2. Runner balancing in geometrically balanced
runner systems (cold and hot runners)
• One of the primary objectives of the runner in a multi-
cavity mold is to deliver identical melt conditions to each
of the cavities in the mold.
• The geometrically balanced runner has always been
thought to provide the optimum ‘natural’ balance.
33
r
æ 4Q ö
g! a = ç ÷
è pR 3 ø
æ RDP ö
tp = ç ÷
è 2L ø
34
Cross-sectional view of high and low sheared regions
inside a runner system
35
"Short shots test"
Illustration of the
development and
placement of high
sheared material in a
geometrically balanced
runner system rate
Geometrically balanced runner
system showing significant shear
induced imbalances
36
37
38
39
40
41
Beaumont Technologies
42
3. Nongeometrically balanced runner layouts:
43
44
Simplified flows common in injection molding
• Power-Law: where m (T ) = m e - a ( T -T )
h = m (T )g! n -1 0
0
45
Typical viscosity curve for polymers
Power-Law
Rotational
viscosimetry
Capillary
rheometry
(confined
geometry)
.
Taux de cisaillement (g)
46
Hypothysis: ü gravity effect: negligeable
(high viscosities for polymers: 102 à 105 Pa.s).
ü Steady-state flow ( ¶ ¶t = 0. )
ü incompressible liquid ( ¶r ¶p = 0 ) .
ü Isothermal flow(T= Cte).
r
ü Laminar flow
Unidirectionnal
vq = vr = 0
z
vz = vz ( r )
ü No slip at the wall: 47
Shearing stress, trz, : forces balance:
P0
r In: P0
ü Dynamic equilibrium:
rR
( P0 - PL ) p r 2
- t rz ( r )( 2p rL ) = 0
L
æ P0 - PL ö
t rz ( r ) = ç ÷r
è 2L ø
Linear profile
Out: PL
PL
z
48
Viscosity,µ , and shear rate, g! , as a function of the
flow rate, Q:
r
49
a. Velocity profile, Vz(r): Newtonien case:
µ= Cste
æ t rz ( r ) ö æ r DP ö
µ =ç ÷ Þ g! ( r ) = ç 2 Lµ ÷
è g! ( r ) ø è ø
- dv z ( r ) æ -DP ö
g! ( r ) = Þ v z ( r ) = - ò g! ( r ) dr = ò ç ÷rdr
dr è 2 Lµ ø
æ -DP ö 2
=ç ÷ r +c
ü No slip: è 4 Lµ ø
R
æ R 2 DP ö
vz ( R ) = 0 Þ c=ç ÷
è 4 Lµ ø
æ R DP ö æ æ r ö ö
2 2
vz ( r ) = ç ÷ çç 1 - ç ÷ ÷÷ (Parabolic profile)
z è 4µ L ø è è R ø ø
50
b. Newtonian viscosity, µ, calculation:
R
= æ -pDP ö p
R
R 4
DP
ü.Q = ò v z ( r )2p rdr ç 2 Lµ ÷ ò ( r - R ) rdr = 8µ L
2 2
è ø0
0
p R 4 DP
Þ µ = 8LQ
c. Shear rate,. g:
t rz ( r ) æ DP ö æ 8LQ ö æ 4Q ö
g! ( r ) =
ü. ç r÷ç 4 ÷ Þ g (r) = ç
! 4 ÷
r
µ è 2 L ø è p R DP ø èpR ø
Linear profile
51
n
Power Law fluids: t = mg!
Cylindrical shape Rectangular shape
p1 p2 p1 p2
R z h y
z
w
L
L
æ RDP ö æ hDP ö
tp =ç ÷ tp =ç ÷
è 2 L ø è 2L ø
1
æ hDP ö n
g! p = ç
1
æ RDP ö n
÷
g! p = ç ÷ è 2 mL ø
è 2 mL ø
æ R D P ö æ Rn öæç æ r ö ö
1 n +1
æ hn öæ h D P ö æç æ 2 y ö ö
n n 1 n +1
÷
n n
vz (r ) = ç ÷ ç ÷ 1- ç ÷ v z ( y ) = çç ÷÷ç ÷ 1- ç ÷ ÷
è 2 mL ø è n + 1 øçè è R ø ÷
ø è 2 (n + 1) øè 2 mL ø çè è h ø ÷
ø
1
æ pR n öæ R D P ö
3 n 1
Q = çç ÷÷ç ÷ nWh æ h D P ö
2 n
Q= ç ÷
è 3n + 1 øè 2 mL ø 2 (1 + 2 n ) è 2 mL ø
52
n<1, pseudoplastic: (approx. flat profile)
r
Power-Law: t = mg! n
1
vz ( r ) = - ç ÷ ç (
æ DP ö n æ n ö nn+1
÷
è 2 Lm ø è n + 1 ø
r - R
n +1
n
)
æ -DP ö
n=1, newtonian: vz ( r ) = ç 4 Lh ÷ ( r 2 - R 2 )
è 0 ø
(Parabolic profile)
æ 4Q ö
g!a = ç 3 ÷
èpR ø
1
æ RDP ö n
gp =ç
! ÷
è 2mL ø
RDP ö
t p = æç ÷
è 2L ø
z
53
APPLICATION:
Balancing the runner system inside a multicavity
injection mold
• Pressure flow through a tube is encountered in the
runner system in jection molds, in certain dies and in
capillary rhometers
• For a well balanced runners system, the time to fill
each of the mold cavities must be the same → same
flow rate Q.
• In addition, for a flow rate Q, and a distribution
channel of radius R1 and length L, we can also solve
for the pressures at the runne system junctions.
54
Example: Injection molding of PS
æ p (2 R1 )3 öæ 2 R1 ( p1 - p2 ) ö s
4Q = çç ÷ç
÷ ÷
è s + 3 øè 2mL ø
S = 1/n
55
æ p (2 R1 )3 öæ 2 R1 ( p1 - p2 ) ö s
4Q = çç ÷ç
÷ ÷
è s + 3 øè 2mL ø
æ p (2 R1 ) öæ 2 R1 ( p2 - p3 ) ö
3 s
2Q = çç ÷çç ÷÷
øè 2m(2 L ) ø
÷
è s+3
56
1
æ p R n ö æ RDP ö
3 n
Q=ç ÷ç ÷
è 3n + 1 ø è 2mL ø æ p (2 R1 )3 öæ 2 R1 ( p1 - p2 ) ö s
4Q = çç ÷ç
÷ ÷
è s + 3 øè 2mL ø
æ p (2 R1 ) öæ 2 R1 ( p2 - p3 ) ö
3 s
2Q = çç ÷çç ÷÷
øè 2m(2 L ) ø
÷
è s+3
æ pR öæ R2 ( p2 - 0) ö
3 s
Q = çç 2
÷÷çç ÷÷
è s + 3 øè 2m(2 L ) ø
57
1
æ p R n ö æ RDP ö
3 n
Q=ç ÷ç ÷
è 3n + 1 ø è 2mL ø æ p (2 R1 )3 öæ 2 R1 ( p1 - p2 ) ö s
4Q = çç ÷ç ÷
÷
è s + 3 øè 2mL ø
æ p (2 R1 ) öæ 2 R1 ( p2 - p3 ) ö
3 s
2Q = çç ÷çç ÷÷
øè 2m(2 L ) ø
÷
è s+3
æ pR öæ R2 ( p2 - 0) ö
3 s
Q = çç 2
÷÷çç ÷÷
è s + 3 øè 2m(2 L ) ø
æ pR13 öæ R1 ( p3 - 0) ö
s
Q = çç ÷÷çç ÷÷
è s + 3 øè 2m(2 L ) ø
E We are faced to 4 non-linear equations
with 4 uncknown parameters: ! iterative solution 58
• Using values of L = 10cm; R1 = 4mm; Q = 20 cm3/s
unknown parameters: p1, p2, p3 and R2 can be obtained
59
Content
1. Standard mold assembly
3. Runnes design:
- Runner balancing.
ØSprue Gate:
63
ØTab Gate:
• The most basic type of gate.
• Generally rectangular in cross-
section and attach to the part along
its perimeter at the parting line of
the mold.
64
ØFan Gate:
• Attached to the part at the parting line.
• It expands out from the runner in the
shape of a fan with its widest end
opening to the cavity.
• The fan region can be relatively thick
and feeds a thin gate land, which is
attached directly to the part
• Advantages:
• Good melt orientation inside the mold
cavity and broad uniform flow front.
• Reduces the problem of jetting.
• Main disadvantage: Requires manual
degating from the part.
65
ØFilm Gate:
• Some similarities a the fan gate but utilizes less space
and material.
• The runner attaches to a gate manifold that
distributes the melt along a broad thin gate land that
is attached directly to the part.
• Films gates work best at fast fill rates.
66
ØRing gate:
• They are essentially film gates that have
been wrapped around a cavity.
• Generally used for external gating on
cylindrical parts.
• Usually used with two-plate cold runner
systems on cylindrical parts open parts
(like tubes)
• The main objective is to eliminate
weldlines.
• Main disadvantage: the gate is difficult to
remove.
67
ØDiaphragm gate:
71
2. Gate positioning:
Important considerations:
73
74
75
76
Content
1. Standard mold assembly
3. Runnes design:
- Runner balancing.
79
Content
1. Standard mold assembly
3. Runnes design:
- Runner balancing.
82
83