S CUBE ANNOTECH

------------------------------------------------------------------
NC Management

1. Process :-

2. NCR Number-

3. NC classification : MINOR / MAJOR

Justification:

4. Non conformity Reference: IATF 16949 or ISO 9001 QMS / Customers Sp. Reqt. / reference to Internal QMS

5.

5. Non conformity statement :

6. Objective evidence (facts):

7. Correction(s)

Resp. & Date

8. Root Cause(s):

Why-1
Why-2
Why-3
Why-4
Why-5

9. Corrective action(s):

Planned end of implementation date: Resp.:

Final evaluation: Closed /Not acceptable

Seen evidences of corrective actions:

Kind of evidence Review

Root cause analysis

Corrections
(for minor NC)
Change in procedure / Work
instruction/SOP
(numbers, dates, description of
changes)
Training Given by whom & when
(training content & records)
Physical changes
(pictures, drawings, …)
Internal audit
(system/process /product as
applicable)
Review system through MRM /
monthly meetings
(KPI, other performance trend)
Others
Process: Quality Assurance
NCR Number-02-16

NC classification : MINOR + Justification:

Results of layout inspection are acceptable and no comment reported yet.
Pattern inspection methods are in place to avoid process rejection.
No chances of shipment of non-conforming products to customer.

NC Reference: IATF 16949- 8.6.2

Non conformity statement:

Process of conducting layout Inspection is not fully effective.

Objective evidence (facts):

There is no evidence of verification for product characteristic like Radius-0.5 mm & Dimension 1.0 mm for
layout inspection dated 25/03/2015 for the Speedometer Magnet-2H245.

Correction(s) :

Layout inspection done with ballooning drawing for all characteristics of 2H245 Magnet dated on
05/09/2016

Root Cause(s):
Why-1
Why-2
Why-3
Why-4
Why-5 :Quality Manual is not addressing the requirement for layout inspection requirements

Corrective(s) action(s):

 Quality manual revised XXXXX

 Training is conducted for the concerns for the requirement on XXXXXX
 Internal audit is conducted for XXX process XXXXX
 Management review is conducted for complete closure of actions on XXXXX

Planned end of implementation date:XXXX By: XXXX

Final evaluation: Closed

Seen evidences of corrective actions:

Kind of evidence Review

Root cause analysis Quality Manual is not addressing the requirement for layout inspection
requirements
Corrections Layout inspection done with ballooning drawing for all characteristics of
(for minor NC) 2H245 Magnet dated on 05/09/2016 like Radius-0.5 mm & Dimension
1.0 mm.

Verified 2H245 magnet ballooned drawing to cover all parameters.

Change in procedure / Work
instruction/SOP
(numbers, dates, description of
changes)
Training Given by whom & when
(training content & records)
Physical changes
(pictures, drawings, …)
Verified Quality manual-QMSM/13, XXXXXX for monitoring methods for
layout inspection
Verified Training record F/MR/6XXXXfor Mr. Khandekar by Mr. Chavan
for the concerns for the requirement
Not required

Internal audit Verified Internal audit record F/MR/XXXX for calibration process
(system/process /product as dated XXXX
applicable)
Review system through MRM / Verified Management review record F/XXXX for complete closure of
monthly meetings actions dated XXXX
((K)PI, other performance trend)
Others Not required
In case more reviews are needed additional evidences table shall be added

Reviewed by: XXX