Results and Discussions On Compaction Characteristics

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Chapter – 5 Results and discussions on Compaction Characteristics

CHAPTER – 5

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ON COMPACTION


CHARACTERISTICS

5.1 LIME – 0% AND SDA – 0%

(i) STANDARD PROCTOR TEST:

OBSERVATIONS

S. Test No.
Particulars
No 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Water content added 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24%

2 Weight of mould W1 (g) 4264 4264 4264 4264 4264 4264


Weight of mould +
3 5884 6076 6162 6218 6069 5926
compacted soil W2 (g)
Weight of compacted soil
4 620 1812 1892 1954 1832 1662
W t (W2-W1)
5 Wet density ᵧwet = WN 1.62 1.81 1.89 1.95 1.83 1.66

6 Dry Density ᵧdry = ᵧwet / 1.41 1.57 1.61 1.62 1.49 1.32
1+w

GRAPH
DRY DENSITY (g/cc)

OMC & MDD


1.7
1.65 1.61 1.62
1.6 1.55
1.55 1.49
1.5
1.45 1.41
1.4
1.35 1.32
1.3
12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30%

WATER CONTENT

Department of Civil Engineering, SVCE Page 50


Chapter – 5 Results and discussions on Compaction Characteristics

RESULTS

 Optimum Moisture Content = 19.4 %


 Maximum Dry Density = 1.63 g/cc

5.2 LIME – 5% AND SDA – 4%

(i) STANDARD PROCTOR TEST:

OBSERVATIONS

S. Test No.
Particulars
No 1 2 3 4 5
1 Water content added (%) 18 20 22 24 26

2 Weight of mould W1 (g) 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950


Weight of mould +
3 3610 3678 3712 3702 3650
compacted soil W2 (g)
Weight of compacted soil
4 1660 1728 1762 1752 1700
W t (W2-W1)
5 Wet density ᵧwet = WN 1.66 1.72 1.76 1.75 1.7

6 Dry Density ᵧdry = ᵧwet / 1.39 1.43 1.45 1.405 1.349


1+w

GRAPH

OMC & MDD


1.46
1.45
DRY DENSITY (g/cc)

1.44
1.43
1.42 1.39 1.405
1.4
1.38
1.349
1.36
1.34
1.32
1.3
1.28
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

WATER CONTENT (%)

Department of Civil Engineering, SVCE Page 51


Chapter – 5 Results and discussions on Compaction Characteristics

RESULTS

 Optimum Moisture Content = 21.7 %


 Maximum Dry Density = 1.45 g/cc

5.3 LIME – 5% AND SDA – 8%

(i) STANDARD PROCTOR TEST:

OBSERVATIONS

S. Test No.
Particulars
No 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Water content added 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30%

2 Weight of mould W1 (g) 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950


Weight of mould +
3 3616 3660 3728 3782 3774 3754
compacted soil W2 (g)
Weight of compacted soil
4 1666 1710 1778 1832 1824 1804
W t (W2-W1)
5 Wet density ᵧwet = WN 1.696 1.741 1.811 1.866 1.857 1.837

6 Dry Density ᵧdry = ᵧwet / 1.388 1.401 1.433 1.453 1425 1.387
1+w

GRAPH

OMC & MDD


1.46 1.453
DRY DENSITY (g/cc)

1.44 1.433 1.425


1.42
1.401
1.4 1.388 1.386
1.38
1.36
1.34
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32

WATER CONTENT (%)

Department of Civil Engineering, SVCE Page 52


Chapter – 5 Results and discussions on Compaction Characteristics

RESULTS

 Optimum Moisture Content = 25.9 %


 Maximum Dry Density = 1.453 g/cc

5.4 LIME – 5% AND SDA – 12%

(i) STANDARD PROCTOR TEST:

OBSERVATIONS

S. Test No.
Particulars
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Water content added 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32%
Weight of mould W1
2 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950 1950
(g)
Weight of mould +
3 3674 3705 3738 3814 3840 3732 3700
compacted soil W2 (g)
Weight of compacted
4 1724 1755 1788 1864 1890 1782 1750
soil W t (W2-W1)
5 Wet density ᵧwet = WN 1.756 1.788 1.82 1.899 1.925 1.815 1.783

6 Dry Density ᵧdry = ᵧwet / 1.463 1.465 1.467 1.507 1.503 1.396 1.35
1+w

GRAPH

OMC & MDD


1.55
DRY DENSITY (g/cc)

1.507
1.503
1.5
1.45 1.463 1.467
1.465
1.396
1.4
1.35 1.35

1.3
1.25
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34

WATER CONTENT (%)

Department of Civil Engineering, SVCE Page 53


Chapter – 5 Results and discussions on Compaction Characteristics

RESULTS

 Optimum Moisture Content = 27.15 %


 Maximum Dry Density = 1.52 g/cc

5.5 COMPARISION OF RESULTS

(i) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (OMC):

COMPARISION OF OMC
28
25.9 27.15
26
OMC (%)

24
22 21.7

20 19.4
18
0 4 8 12 16

PERCENTAGE OF SDA

COMMENT: OMC increased with increase in percentage of SDA.

(ii) MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (MDD):

COMPARISION OF MDD
1.68
1.64 1.63
1.6
MDD (g/cc)

1.56
1.52 1.52
1.48 1.453
1.44 1.45
1.4
0 4 8 12 16

PERCENTAGE OF SDA

COMMENT: MDD decreased at 4% SDA and then increased with increase in


percentage of SDA.

Department of Civil Engineering, SVCE Page 54

You might also like