Item 1 Item 2 Item 11.a Item 12.b Item 13.

a
Respondents Residence Adequate Due process & Human Rights Put offenders behind bars
1 Rentosa Brgy A-1 9 4 3
2 Martinez Brgy Lower Hills 5 5 2
3 Dela Cruz Brgy Upper Hills 7 6 4
4 Adique Brgy Lower Hills 5 4 1
5 Gamboa Brgy A-1 6 5 6
6 Evangelista Brgy Upper Hills 8 6 4
7 Mati Brgy Upper Hills 8 7 3
8 Aberin Brgy Upper Hills 7 5 4
9 Zebago Brgy Lower Hills 4 5 5
10 Legaspi Brgy A-1 6 4 3
11 Sentosa Brgy A-1 7 5 4
12 Baguilad Brgy Lower Hills 7 6 2
13 Hall Brgy Lower Hills 4 3 3
14 Enriquez Brgy Upper Hills 8 4 4
15 Ampil Brgy A-1 7 5 6
16 Santos Brgy A-1 7 6 3
17 Ignacio Brgy Upper Hills 9 3 4
18 German Brgy Lower Hills 3 5 2
19 Seguinial Brgy A-1 5 6 1
20 Benitez Brgy Upper Hills 8 4 5
21 Mendoza Brgy A-1 7 2 4
22 Lumaquin Brgy A-1 5 5 2
23 Rojas Brgy Upper Hills 7 4 3
24 Uy Brgy A-1 6 4 6
25 Fabian Brgy Lower Hills 3 1 3
26 Sison Brgy Lower Hills 2 3 4
27 Magno Brgy Lower Hills 4 3 4
28 Lee Brgy A-1 7 7 3
29 Albay Brgy Upper Hills 9 5 3
30 Villagracia Brgy Upper Hills 7 4 2
31 Abubakar Brgy A-1 6 5 1
32 De Gama Brgy A-1 7 7 4
33 Corpuz Brgy A-1 5 5 5
34 Maambot Brgy Lower Hills 3 3 6
35 Tolentino Brgy A-1 6 3 5
 Item 14
Did criminality decrease?
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
 Item 1 Item 2 Item 11.a
1 Rentosa Brgy A-1 9
5 Gamboa Brgy A-1 6 Ignacio
10 Legaspi Brgy A-1 6 Dela Cruz
11 Sentosa Brgy A-1 7 Evangelista
15 Ampil Brgy A-1 7 Mati
16 Santos Brgy A-1 7 Aberin
19 Seguinial Brgy A-1 5 Enriquez
21 Mendoza Brgy A-1 7 Benitez
22 Lumaquin Brgy A-1 5 Rojas
24 Uy Brgy A-1 6 Albay
28 Lee Brgy A-1 7 Villagracia
31 Abubakar Brgy A-1 6
32 De Gama Brgy A-1 7
33 Corpuz Brgy A-1 5 N
35 Tolentino Brgy A-1 6 ΣX1
2 Martinez Brgy Lower Hills 5 10
4 Adique Brgy Lower Hills 5 X̅1
9 Zebago Brgy Lower Hills 4
12 Baguilad Brgy Lower Hills 7
13 Hall Brgy Lower Hills 4
18 German Brgy Lower Hills 3
25 Fabian Brgy Lower Hills 3
26 Sison Brgy Lower Hills 2
27 Magno Brgy Lower Hills 4
34 Maambot Brgy Lower Hills 3
17 Ignacio Brgy Upper Hills 9 10
3 Dela Cruz Brgy Upper Hills 7
6 Evangelista Brgy Upper Hills 8
7 Mati Brgy Upper Hills 8
8 Aberin Brgy Upper Hills 7
14 Enriquez Brgy Upper Hills 8
20 Benitez Brgy Upper Hills 8
23 Rojas Brgy Upper Hills 7
29 Albay Brgy Upper Hills 9
30 Villagracia Brgy Upper Hills 7
Respondents Residence Adequate
Brgy Upper Hills (N1 =10) Brgy Lower Hills (N1 =10)
X1 X12 X2 X22
9 81 Martinez 5 25
7 49 Adique 5 25
8 64 Zebago 4 16
8 64 Baguilad 7 49
7 49 Hall 4 16
8 64 German 3 9
8 64 Fabian 3 9
7 49 Sison 2 4
9 81 Magno 4 16
7 49 Maambot 3 9

10 10
78 ΣX1 2
614 ΣX2 40 ΣX22 178

7.80 X̅12 61.40 X̅2 4.00 X̅22 17.80

 Brgy Upper Hills (N1 =10) Brgy Lower Hills (N1 =10)
X1 X12 X2 X22

Ignacio 9 81 Martinez 5 25

Dela Cruz 7 49 Adique 5 25

Evangelista 8 64 Zebago 4 16
Mati 8 64 Baguilad 7 49
Aberin 7 49 Hall 4 16
Enriquez 8 64 German 3 9
Benitez 8 64 Fabian 3 9
Rojas 7 49 Sison 2 4
Albay 9 81 Magno 4 16
Villagracia 7 49 Maambot 3 9

N 10 10
ΣX1 78 ΣX1 2
614 ΣX2 40 ΣX22 178

X̅1 7.80 X̅12 61.40 X̅2 4.00 X̅22 17.80

1. Find standard error of the difference between means

SX̅ 1 - X̅ 2 = √(N1s12 + N2s22)* (N1 + N2) Hint: Add the product

√(N1 + N2 - 2)* (N1*N2) of N and std and multiply
by the sum of N
SX̅ 1 - X̅ 2 = √[10(.56) + 10(1.8)] x (10 + 10) 0.80 Divide by N
√(10 + 10- 2) x (10 * 10)
58 20 34.05877
2. Find the t ratio 18 100 42.42641

t= X̅1 - X̅2
SX̅1 - X̅2

t= 7.8 - 4.0 4.75 3.8

0.80 0.80

3. Determine the degrees of freedom

df = N1 + N 2 - 2 18 18
4. Compare the obtained t vs table t value
The calculated t is 4.75, which is MORE than table t 1.734. This is a df =10 and α = .05.
So we retain the NULL HYPOTHESIS of no difference in population means.
The DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEANS of "adequate security" between Upper Hills and Lower Hills residents are STATISTICALLY SI
The difference between MEANS - Upper Hills (7.8) and Lower Hills (4) CANNOT BE IGNORED AS A SAMPLING ERROR.
Critical values of t Table
df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
18 1.734
 Brgy Upper Hills Brgy Lower Hills
N 10 10
Mean 7.8 4
s2(variance) 0.56 1.8
s (stdev) 0.75 1.3
nts are STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT.
PLING ERROR.
 Respondents Residence Due process & Human Rights Brgy Upper Hills (N1 =
Item 1 Item 2 Item 12.b X1
1 Rentosa Brgy A-1 4 Ignacio 3
5 Gamboa Brgy A-1 5 Dela Cruz 6
10 Legaspi Brgy A-1 4 Evangelista 6
11 Sentosa Brgy A-1 5 Mati 7
15 Ampil Brgy A-1 5 Aberin 5
16 Santos Brgy A-1 6 Enriquez 4
19 Seguinial Brgy A-1 6 Benitez 4
21 Mendoza Brgy A-1 2 Rojas 4
22 Lumaquin Brgy A-1 5 Albay 5
24 Uy Brgy A-1 4 Villagracia 4
28 Lee Brgy A-1 7
31 Abubakar Brgy A-1 5
32 De Gama Brgy A-1 7 N 10
33 Corpuz Brgy A-1 5 ΣX1
35 Tolentino Brgy A-1 3
2 Martinez Brgy Lower Hills 5 X̅1
4 Adique Brgy Lower Hills 4
9 Zebago Brgy Lower Hills 5
12 Baguilad Brgy Lower Hills 6
13 Hall Brgy Lower Hills 3
18 German Brgy Lower Hills 5
25 Fabian Brgy Lower Hills 1
26 Sison Brgy Lower Hills 3
27 Magno Brgy Lower Hills 3
34 Maambot Brgy Lower Hills 3
17 Ignacio Brgy Upper Hills 3
3 Dela Cruz Brgy Upper Hills 6
6 Evangelista Brgy Upper Hills 6
7 Mati Brgy Upper Hills 7
8 Aberin Brgy Upper Hills 5
14 Enriquez Brgy Upper Hills 4
20 Benitez Brgy Upper Hills 4
23 Rojas Brgy Upper Hills 4
29 Albay Brgy Upper Hills 5
30 Villagracia Brgy Upper Hills 4
Respondents Residence Due process & Human Rights
Brgy Upper Hills (N1 =10) Brgy Lower Hills (N1 =10)
X12 X2 X22
Martinez 5
Adique 4
Zebago 5
Baguilad 6
Hall 3
German 5
Fabian 1
Sison 3
Magno 3
Maambot 3

10
ΣX1 2
ΣX2 ΣX22

X̅12 X̅2 X̅22

 Brgy Upper Hills (N1 =10) Brgy Lower Hills (N1 =10)
X1 X12 X2 X22

Ignacio 3 9 Martinez 5 25

Dela Cruz 6 36 Adique 4 16

Evangelista 6 36 Zebago 5 25
Mati 7 49 Baguilad 6 36
Aberin 5 25 Hall 3 9
Enriquez 4 16 German 5 25
Benitez 4 16 Fabian 1 1
Rojas 4 16 Sison 3 9
Albay 5 25 Magno 3 9
Villagracia 4 16 Maambot 3 9

N 10 10
ΣX1 48 ΣX1 2
244 ΣX2 38 ΣX22 164

X̅1 4.80 X̅12 24.40 X̅2 3.80 X̅22 16.40

1. Find standard error of the difference between means

SX̅ 1 - X̅ 2 = √(N1s12 + N2s22)* (N1 + N2) Hint: Add the product

√(N1 + N2 - 2)* (N1*N2) of N and std and multiply
by the sum of N
SX̅ 1 - X̅ 2 = √[10(1.36) + 10(2.0)] x (10 + 10) Divide by N
√(10 + 10- 2) x (10 * 10)
33.6 20 25.9
2. Find the t ratio 18 100 42.4

t= X̅1 - X̅2
SX̅1 - X̅2

t= 4.8 - 3.80 1
0.61 0.61

3. Determine the degrees of freedom

df = N1 + N 2 - 2 18

4. Compare the obtained t vs table t value

The calculated t is 1.64, which is LESS than table t 1.734. This is a df =10 and α = .05.
So we retain the NULL HYPOTHESIS of no difference in population means.
The DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEANS of "due process & respect for human rights" between Upper Hills and Lower Hills residents
The difference between MEANS - Upper Hills (4.80) and Lower Hills (3.80) might be a result of a SAMPLING ERROR.
Critical values of t Table
df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
18 1.734
 Brgy Upper Hills Brgy Lower Hills
N 10 10
Mean 4.8 3.8
s (variance) 1.36 2.0
and Lower Hills residents are NOTSTATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT.
LING ERROR.
 Item 1 Item 2 Item 13.a Brgy A-1 (N1 =15)
1 Rentosa Brgy A-1 3 15 X1
5 Gamboa Brgy A-1 6 Rentosa 3
10 Legaspi Brgy A-1 3 Gamboa 6
11 Sentosa Brgy A-1 4 Legaspi 3
15 Ampil Brgy A-1 6 Sentosa 4
16 Santos Brgy A-1 3 Ampil 6
19 Seguinial Brgy A-1 1 Santos 3
21 Mendoza Brgy A-1 4 Seguinial 1
22 Lumaquin Brgy A-1 2 Mendoza 4
24 Uy Brgy A-1 6 Lumaquin 2
28 Lee Brgy A-1 3 Uy 6
31 Abubakar Brgy A-1 1 Lee 3
32 De Gama Brgy A-1 4 Abubakar 1
33 Corpuz Brgy A-1 5 De Gama 4
35 Tolentino Brgy A-1 5 Corpuz 5
2 Martinez Brgy Lower Hills 2 10 Tolentino 5
4 Adique Brgy Lower Hills 1
9 Zebago Brgy Lower Hills 5 N 15
12 Baguilad Brgy Lower Hills 2 ΣX1 56
13 Hall Brgy Lower Hills 3
18 German Brgy Lower Hills 2 X̅1 3.73
25 Fabian Brgy Lower Hills 3
26 Sison Brgy Lower Hills 4
27 Magno Brgy Lower Hills 4
34 Maambot Brgy Lower Hills 6
3 Dela Cruz Brgy Upper Hills 4
6 Evangelista Brgy Upper Hills 4
7 Mati Brgy Upper Hills 3
8 Aberin Brgy Upper Hills 4
14 Enriquez Brgy Upper Hills 4
17 Ignacio Brgy Upper Hills 4
20 Benitez Brgy Upper Hills 5
23 Rojas Brgy Upper Hills 3
29 Albay Brgy Upper Hills 3
30 Villagracia Brgy Upper Hills 2
Respondents Residence Put offenders behind bars
Brgy A-1 (N1 =15) Brgy Lower Hills (N1 =10)
X1 2 X2 X22
9 Martinez 2 4
36 Adique 1 1
9 Zebago 5 25
16 Baguilad 2 4
36 Hall 3 9
9 German 2 4
1 Fabian 3 9
16 Sison 4 16
4 Magno 4 16
36 Maambot 6 36
9
1
16
25
25

10
ΣX12 248 ΣX2 32 ΣX22 124

X̅12 16.53 X̅2 3.20 X̅22 12.40

 Brgy A-1 (N1 =15) Brgy Lower Hills (N1 =10)
X1 X12 X2 X22

Rentosa 3 9 Martinez 2 4

Gamboa 6 36 Adique 1 1

Legaspi 3 9 Zebago 5 25
Sentosa 4 16 Baguilad 2 4
Ampil 6 36 Hall 3 9
Santos 3 9 German 2 4
Seguinial 1 1 Fabian 3 9
Mendoza 4 16 Sison 4 16
Lumaquin 2 4 Magno 4 16
Uy 6 36 Maambot 6 36
Lee 3 9
Abubakar 1 1
De Gama 4 16
Corpuz 5 25
Tolentino 5 25

N 15 10
ΣX1 56 ΣX1 2
248 ΣX2 32 ΣX22 124

X̅1 3.73 X̅12 16.53 X̅2 3.20 X̅22 12.40

1. Find 'non-pooled' standard error of the difference between means (SD)

SX̅ 1 - X̅ 2 = √s12 +√ s22

√(N1 -1) √(N2-1)

SX̅ 1 - X̅ 2 = √2.60 +√2.20 0.43 0.40 0.827 1.61 1.48

√(15 -1) √(10-1) Hint: Different population size 3.74 3.74

2. Find the t ratio

t= X̅1 - X̅2
SX̅1 - X̅2

t= 3.73 - 3.20 0.641

0.827

3. Determine the degrees of freedom by using the smaller sample size - 23

 df = 10 Hint: we use the smaller sample size

4. Compare the obtained t vs table t value

The calculated t is 0.641, which must exceed table t 2.228 to reject null hypothesis. This df = 10 and α = .05.
So we retain the NULL HYPOTHESIS. The difference in mean level between Brgy A-1 and Brgy Upper Hills could be the result
of sampling error notwithstanding their differences between MEANS

Critical values of t Table

df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
10 2.228

df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)

0.20
10 1.372
lls (N1 =10) Brgy Upper Hills Brgy Lower Hills
N 15 10
Mean 3.73 3.20
s (variance) 2.60 2.2
StDev 1.61 1.5
r Hills could be the result
1. Find the mean for each group
X̅1 0.00
X̅2 0.00

2. Find the SD for the difference between time 1 and time 2

SD= √ΣD2 -√ (X̅ 1 - X̅ 1)2
√N
0.6 0.36
SD= √12 -√ (3.8 -3.20)2 2.00 0.36 1.28
√10
1.2
SD= √ 1.2 - (.6)^2 0.916515 0.84
0.916515
SD=

3. Find standard error of the difference between means

SD= SD
√N 2 - 1 0.917 0.30566667
3
SD= 0.971
√10 - 1
4. Find the t ratio or translate the sample mean difference into units of standard error of the difference

t= X̅1 - X̅2
SD 1.96078431

t= 3.8 - 3.20
0.306

5. Determine the degrees of freedom =9

df = N-1

6. Compare the obtained t vs table t value

The calculated t is 1.96, which is less than table t ratio 2.62.
To reject the NULL HYPOTHESIS at α of .05 with 9 degrees of freedom
the calculated t is 1.96 must be greater than 2.262. Retain the null hypothesis.

Critical values of t Table

df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
9 2.262
We want to know the perception of security in Barangay Lower Hills before and after.
Scale is 1 = least secure to 10 = mostly secure
Before After Difference
program after program D = (X1 - X2)
Respondent X1 X2 X1 - X2 D2
Martinez 5 4 1 1
Adique 4 3 1 1
Zebago 5 4 1 1
Baguilad 6 5 1 1
Hall 3 4 -1 1
German 5 5 0 0
Fabian 1 2 -1 1
Sison 3 2 1 1
Magno 3 1 2 4
Maambot 3 2 1 1

N 10 ΣD2 12
ΣX1 ΣX1 2

X̅1 X̅12

9
s before and after.
1. Find the two sample proportions and combined sample proportion
P1 0.45
P2 0.32
P3 0.39

2. Compute the standard error of the difference

SP1 - P2 = √(P3(1 - P3) * √ (N1 + N2)
√(N1*N2)

SP1 - P2 = √(.39(1 - .39) * √ (180 + 150) = .0539

√(180*150)

3. Translate the difference between proprotions into units of standard error of the difference

z= P1 - P 2
SP1 - P2

z= .45 - .32 =2.4118

0.0539

4. Compare the obtained z value vs table A

The calculated z value is 2.4118, which is more than the table value of z = 1.96.
We reject the NULL HYPOTHESIS at the significance level of .05.
We can conclude that there is a statistical significance between Male and Female as to support RH Bill.
Critical values of t Table
df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
ꝏ 1.96
 What is the proportion between Male and Female legislators who supp
Reporductive Health Bill?

MALE FEMALE
X1 X2
N 180 150
Support the RH 81 48
Proportion who supports 0.45 0.32

*Observe that the sample populations are different.

support RH Bill.
Female legislators who support the

TOTAL

330
129
0.39

ulations are different.

 Respondents Gender Did criminality decrease? Did criminal incidence in San I
Item 1 Item 3 Item 14 program of the new administr
5 Gamboa F YES 1
9 Zebago F YES 1 FEMALE
21 Mendoza F YES 1 X1
23 Rojas F YES 1 N 35
31 Abubakar F YES 1 NO 13
35 Tolentino F YES 1 0.37
2 Martinez F NO 2
4 Adique F NO 2
8 Aberin F NO 2 *Observe that the sample popul
11 Sentosa F NO 2
13 Hall F NO 2
14 Enriquez F NO 2
16 Santos F NO 2
20 Benitez F NO 2
25 Fabian F NO 2
26 Sison F NO 2
28 Lee F NO 2
32 De Gama F NO 2
33 Corpuz F NO 2
1 Rentosa M YES 1
17 Ignacio M YES 1
19 Seguinial M YES 1
29 Albay M YES 1
3 Dela Cruz M NO 2
6 Evangelista M NO 2
7 Mati M NO 2
10 Legaspi M NO 2
12 Baguilad M NO 2
15 Ampil M NO 2
18 German M NO 2
22 Lumaquin M NO 2
24 Uy M NO 2
27 Magno M NO 2
30 Villagracia M NO 2
34 Maambot M NO 2
nal incidence in San Ignacio decline with the
of the new administration

MALE TOTAL
X2
35 70
12 25
0.34 0.36

hat the sample populations are different.

1. Find the two sample proportions and combined sample proportion
P1 0.37
P2 0.34
P3 0.36

2. Compute the standard error of the difference

SP1 - P2 = √(P3(1 - P3) * √ (N1 + N2)
√(N1*N2)

SP1 - P2 = √(.36 (1 - .36) * √ (35 + 35) 0.055 0.2304 8.3666

√(35*35) 35

3. Translate the difference between proprotions into units of standard error of the difference

z= P1 - P 2
SP1 - P2

z= .37 - .34 0.5447005

0.055

4. Compare the obtained z value vs table A

The calculated z value is .545, which is more than the table value of z = 1.96.
We reject the NULL HYPOTHESIS at the significance level of .05.
We can conclude that there is a statistical significance between Male and Female as to support RH Bill.
Critical values of t Table
df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
ꝏ 1.96
 Did criminal incidence in San Ignacio decline with the
program of the new administration

FEMALE MALE
X1 X2
N 35 35
NO 13 12
0.37 0.34

0.239045721866879 *Observe that the sample populations are different.

support RH Bill.
 TOTAL

70
25
0.36

ulations are different.

1. Find the mean for each group
X̅1 58.11
X̅2 5.4

2. Find the SD for the difference between the two groups

SD= √ΣD2 -√ (X̅ 1 - X̅ 1)2
√N

SD= √1070 -√ (58.11 - 66.11)2

√9

SD= 7.41

3. Find standard error of the difference between means

SD= SD
√N - 1
SD= 7.41 =2.62
√9 - 1
4. Find the t ratio or translate the sample mean difference into units of standard error of the difference

t= X̅1 - X̅2
SD

t= 58.11 - 66.11 = - 3.05

2.62

5. Determine the degrees of freedom

df = N (9) - 1 =8

6. Compare the obtained t vs table t value

The calculated t is -3.05, which is less than the critical value of -1.86.
We reject the NULL HYPOTHESIS. There was statistical improvement in the remedial session.
Our case is two groups of students and we are supposed to evaluate differences in their sample scores
after the remedial sessions - before and after.

Before After Difference

remedial remedial D = (X1 - X2)
Respondent X1 X2 X1 - X2 D2
1 58 66 -8 64
2 63 68 -5 25
3 66 72 -6 36
4 70 76 -6 36
5 63 78 -15 225
6 51 56 -5 25
7 44 69 -25 625
8 58 55 3 9
9 50 55 -5 25

ΣX1 523 ΣX2 595 ΣD2 1070

X̅1 58.11 X̅1 2
66.11 X̅D 2
118.89
es in their sample scores
1. Find the mean for each group
X̅1 3879.08
X̅2 3061.28

2. Find the SD for the difference between the two groups

SD= √ΣD2 -√ (X̅ 1 - X̅ 1)2
√N

SD= √43,848,677.8 -√ (3,879.08 - 3,061.28)2

√16

SD= 6621.83 817.79

4
1655.46

837.66

3. Find standard error of the difference between means

SD= SD
√N - 1

SD= -403.93 216.284

√16- 1
4. Find the t ratio or translate the sample mean difference into units of standard error of the difference

t= X̅1 - X̅2
SD

t= 3,879.08 - 3,061.28 3.78

-104.29

5. Determine the degrees of freedom

df = N (16) - 1 15.0

6. Compare the obtained t vs table t value

The calculated t is 3.78, which is less than the critical value of 2.131
We reject the NULL HYPOTHESIS. There was statistical improvement in the remedial session.
Critical values of t Table
df Level of significance for two-tailed test (α)
0.05
15 2.131
 Our case is about the collections of real estate taxes in different regions.
Government introduced the ERP program to increase collection efficiency.
Real estate taxes (In millions)
Before After Difference
ERP program ERP program D = (X1 - X2)
Respondent X1 X2 X1 - X2 D2
1 NCR 27,036.10 21,204.95 5,831.15 34,002,279.53
2 CAR 621.57 410.88 210.70 44,393.23
3 I 1,476.21 1,502.30 - 26.09 680.71
4 II 937.61 539.28 398.33 158,667.87
5 III 6,001.00 4,881.39 1,119.60 1,253,510.67
6 IV-A 12,397.79 9,740.93 2,656.86 7,058,926.08
7 IV-B 832.12 529.96 302.16 91,301.12
8 V 1,079.12 814.22 264.90 70,170.84
9 VI 2,180.81 2,350.16 - 169.36 28,682.22
10 VII 2,923.42 2,225.51 697.91 487,081.72
11 VIII 563.45 444.15 119.30 14,233.19
12 IX 798.11 461.68 336.43 113,187.66
13 X 1,642.20 1,248.31 393.89 155,149.20
14 XI 1,911.64 1,606.72 304.92 92,977.04
15 XII 1,067.38 558.20 509.18 259,262.50
16 XIII (CARAGA) 596.70 461.88 134.81 18,174.19

ΣX1 62,065.21 ΣX2 48,980.51 ΣD2 43,848,677.77

X̅1 3,879.08 X̅1 2
3,061.28 X̅D 2
2,740,542.36