Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lma Ii Cursuri Sintaxa Propozitiei Oct 2021
Lma Ii Cursuri Sintaxa Propozitiei Oct 2021
LECTURE I
This course of lectures aims to look into the structure of the simple finite sentence, namely sentences
that contain one single predication relation, the verb of which carries a Tense marker. The theoretical
perspective is the one offered by the Theory of Government and Binding, first synthesized by Chomsky in
“Lectures on Government and Binding” (1981).
UG was defined by Chomsky (1976) as follows: “the system of principles, conditions and rules that are
elements or properties of all human languages…. the essence of human language.” The goal of UG is to
provide a theory of grammar that should be able to offer a number of principles, a number of generalized
statements which are valid cross-linguistically. The differences between languages are accounted for in
terms of parameters, namely the different values that the principles have in different languages.
Principles
Definition: language relies on structural relationships rather than on the linear sequence of items.
Operations on sentences such as movement require knowledge of the structural relationships of the
words rather than their linear sequence.
1. The letter will arrive tomorrow. Will the letter arrive tomorrow?
2. This is a dagger which I see before me. *A this a dagger which I see before me?
3. The man who is tall is John. *Is the man who tall is John?
Is the man who is tall John?
What moves in order to form a question in English is not the third or the fourth word in a sentence, but
the auxiliary in the main clause, irrespective of whether it comes first or second in the sentence.
Movement of the auxiliary depends on the knowledge of the structure of the language. English, like all
The theory emphasizes the Lexicon and the fact that speakers know what each word in the language
means, how it is pronounced and how it behaves syntactically. The syntactic description of the sentence
and the lexical properties of each lexical item are integrated by the theory via the Projection Principle,
which requires that syntax should accommodate the lexical specification of each lexical item.
4. Helen likes the French paintings.
*Helen likes.
5. Peter is working.
Each lexical item has a lexical entry in the Lexicon which provides information about the phonological
form of the item, its categorical status (to which lexical category it belongs), and also about the number
of arguments the item has and the theta roles (Agent, Patient, Theme, Experiencer, a.s.o,) that item can
assign.
6. like categorial information [+V, -N]
like -------›CS/[____NP]
work------›CS/ [ ____ ]
There are two types of selectional restrcitions which operate on the lexical item so as to define the
subcategorization properties of the respective item – c-slection (categorial selection) and s-selection
(semantic selection), which in fact are predictable from the thematic properties of the item. C-selection
refers to the type of categorical phrase that is subcategorized by the item, while s-selection refers to the
sematic properties of the phrase subcategorized by the respective item.
So, the lexical entry is said to project onto syntax. The Projection Principle states that the lexical features
of each item stored in the Lexicon are projected to the other levels. It is a universal of human language,
as all languages integrate their syntactic features with their lexical entries.
The Principle of Endocentricity
One other important aspect of our study of the language is the way in which the elements are ordered in
a language. The main assumption is that sentences may be broken up into constituent phrases that are in
fact words grouped together round a head. The head is that word without which the respective phrase
has no meaning. The head gives the category of the phrase, as the phrase is in fact a projection round a
head, it is endocentric. One important criterion to identify a phrase is the fact that the phrase and its
head have the same distribution (appear in the same contexts).
It is another principle of UG that requires all sentences to have a subject. The problem is that the subject
is not always overt even in the finite sentences. This is a variation between languages, a parameter called
the Pro-drop Parameter. For instance, English is a non-pro-drop language, whereas Romanian is a pro-
drop language.
We can now say that the grammar of a language can be seen as a particular set of values for the
paramenters, while the overall system of rules, principles and parametsrs is UG, which we may take as to
be one element of the human biological endowment, namely the language facility.
LEXICON
D-STRUCTURE
MOVE α
S-STRUCTURE
GB requires two levels of representation, namely d-structure and s-structure. At d-structure all the
elements in the sentence are in their initial location, while at s-structure they have moved. Move α is the
one single basic operation on a sentence. Deletion, insertion and substitution may also operate on the
sentence. Move α operates on d-structure and is a general rule that says that anything can be moved
leaving behind a trace co-indexed with the moved element. Traces are indicated by t and they mark the
original place in the sentence of the elements that have moved. They are symbolized at the level of s-
structure as a means of preserving the initial syntactic relations existing between the constituents of the
sentence so as not to alter the meaning of the sentence. The PF (how the sentence is pronounced) and
the LF (the assignment of meaning) components operate on the s-structure, not on the d-structure.
[She will] can be deleted under identity. One can delete only items which are recovereable.
[There] is inserted in sentence initial position as it is empty semantically and it does not alter the
meaning of the sentence.
Lexical categories – open classes of words that have descriptive content (N, A, Adv, P, V).
- They contain an infinite number of members, new ones can always be added to such
classes.
- both c-selection and s-selection operate on lexical categories
- are assigned theta-roles (N) or are theta-role assigners (V,P)
- are assigned case (N) or are case assigners (V,P)
16. *He buy a book. (He bought a book / He buys a book every week)
The simple finite sentence is a projection of the INFL node that carries Tense and Agreement. INFL is a
functional category which dominates all verbal inflection. Depending on whether I 0 carries markers for
Tense or not sentences are divided into two main classes – finite and non-finite. Finite sentences carry
Tense markers, while non-finite ones are [-Tense]. We include infinitives, gerunds, present and past
participles and also small clauses under the category of non-finite sentences.
17. I will ask [whether [Poirot will abandon the investigation.]] --- THAT selects a finite clause
I will say [that [Poirot …………….]]
18. I want [for [him to come] --- FOR-TO selected an infinitive (non-finite) clause
We suggest that the Complementizer is the head of the sentence. Complementizers are non-lexical heads,
they are functional categories which turn a clause into the argument of a head. The choice of the
Complementizer depends on the lexical properties of the head.
The Auxiliary
- auxiliaries are a functional category.
- modal verbs, Progressive and passive BE; Perfective HAVE; Negative and Interrogative DO.
- auxiliaries are generated in a pre-verbal position, to the left of the verb
- auxiliaries lack an event structure; do not assign a theta-role
- auxiliaries can be negated by NOT; they can invert with the Su in question formation
- auxiliaries occur in tag questions
- DO is devoid of amy meaning.It appears as a Last Resort. It is a support for the negative or the Tense
affix in the Simple present Tense and the Simple Past Tense
Argument Structure
Theta Theory
The intuitive idea of participants in an activity has been formalized in terms of the general notion of
argument structure and of the notion of thematic structure.
Generally speaking, verbs have an argument structure, based on the structure of the event denoted by
the verb. The structure of this event determines the structure and the meaning of the sentence. The
argument structure of a verb determines which constituents of a sentence are obligatory. The obligatory
constituents are called complements, while the non-obligatory ones are called adjuncts.
The specific semantic relations between a verb and its arguments are referred to in terms of theta
roles. The verbs theta-marks its arguments by assigning a theta role to each of its arguments.
Theta-Criterion - each argument is assigned one and only one theta role, and each theta role is
assigned to one and only one argument.
Theta roles
1. Agent/Actor – the initiator of some action; the ‘doer’ or instigator of the action denoted by the
predicate.
John made a table.
2. Theme/Patient – entity undergoing the effect of some action; the entity that is moved by the action
or event denoted by the predicate; an argument undergoing motion of some sort, including motion in a
metaphorical sense, such as a change of state; the term for arguments that are most 'affected' in a
situation or for the content of an experience.
The ball rolled towards him.
Jane crumbled to the floor.
1. (a)Mary is quiet.
(b) Jack is a doctor.
(c) Susan is of my age.
(d) She will make a good mother.
These sentences contain a copula (be in sentences a,b,c) or a copula-like verb (make in sentence d) which
functions as the link between the subject of the sentence and the constituent which predicates about the subject.
This element is called a predicative. The copula or the copula-like verb and the predicative form a copulative
predicate.
As we can see the predicative can be expressed by a wide range of phrases. Only the copula BE allows the full range
of predicatives, the other copula-like verbs allow only a limited number of possibilities.
THE COPULA BE
If we look at the sentences under 1, we shall immediately see that it is the predicative not the copula which assigns
a property to the subject, namely Mary is assigned the property quiet, Jack the property a doctor, a.s.o, which
means that the predication relation hold between the subject and the predicative, and not between the subject and
the copula. We can say that the subject of the sentence is assigned a theta role and so is an argument of the
predicative, not of the copula BE. It can be demonstrated by the semantic relations that the predicative imposes
on the subject.
The sentences above are ungrammatical as the property assigned by the predicatice to the subject violates the s-
selection. A Spinster and buxom select a [+female] entity, while father selects a [+male] entity.
The copula does not assign an external theta role because it does not have substantive content (meaning). This
means that the copula does not have an external argument; it only has an internal argument, a small clause which
account for the predication relation between the subject ant the predicative. The subject is generated in the subject
position of the Small Clause, where it is assigned a theta role, and from there it moves to the subject position of the
sentence to be assigned case and also to satisfy the EPP, which says that all sentences must have a subject. This
means that BE cannot assign case, which is in keeping with the fact that it does not assign a theta role to an
external argument. So the copula BE behaves like an unaccusative verb.
Burzio’s generalization (i) a verb which lacks an external argument fails to assign Accusative case
(ii)a verb which fails to assign Accusative case fails to theta-mark an external argument
The NP generated in the subject position of the Small Clause will move to subject position of the sentence in order
to be assigned case.
Conclusion
The copula Be is a raising verb taking a small clause as its complement, it lacks an external argument, fails
to assign case to its complement, does not assign a theta role. Therefore it is an unaccusative verb which
selects a small clause, the subject of the clause being generated in the subject position of the small clause
out of which it raises to be assigned case.
The copula BE is semantically light, which has been taken as a possible explanation for the fact that it
shares a number of properties with the auxiliaries.
It behaves like auxiliary verbs – it moves in question formation; it is directly negated by not/n’t, it can be
stressed by emphatic affirmations, it occurs in tags and codas
4. (a) Are they students?
(b) They are not/aren’t students.
(c) Oh, but they ARE students.
(d) They are students, aren’t they?
(e) They are students, and so are theor friends.
Unlike auxiliaries, which only allow one type of complement (VP), the copula allows a wide variety of small
clauses as complements (DP, AP, NP, PP, IP, CP).
When the small clause contains two NPs, any of the two can raise to [Spec,IP]
To conclude, we can say that the copula BE is an unaccusative verb that has a number of specific properties
which distinguish it from regular unaccusatives and from auxiliaries as well.
Small clauses are reduced clauses which lack the functional categories, mainly Tense, but which denote
predication relations, namely states of affairs which must receive temporal anchoring. This is done by the verb the
small clause is a complement of. The copula carries the markers for Tense, Aspect, Agreement, Mood .
Fall, stand, make, sit, loom, remain, hold, run, get, lie, grow, go, turn, pass, seem, come, etc
Copula-like verbs behave like the copula. They lack an external argument, their internal complement is a small
clause, so they are raising verbs like the copula, in the sense that they trigger the movement of the subject of the
Small Clause to the subject position of the copulative clause, but the copula-like verbs do not move.
Nevertheless, there are a number of differences between the copula and the copula-like verbs.
They preserve part of their lexical meaning (durative – stay, remain, inchoative –become, get)
They impose certain selectional restrictions on the small clause (see the examples above)
They do not combine with the full range of small clauses as BE
They do not raise, do not invert in question formation, need do-support, are not negated by not/n’t, need
do-support, do not appear in tags and codas.
THE PREDICATIVE
Adjectives are heads that project structure, can be modified by an adverb in the pre-head position, can
select a complement (PP , CP or IP), can also contain adjuncts
ATTRIBUTIVE ADJECTIVES
Nevertheles, there are a number of adjectives which appear post-nominally even when used attributively -
general, public, martial. laureate
17. secretary general, attorney general, notary public, court martial, poet laureate
There are adjectives which, under specific conditions, appear post-nominally even when used attributively
Attributive adjectives have degrees of comparison, but only those which denote gradable properties. They
can be modified by degree words (quite, rather). Adjectives that denote ungradable properties do not allow
comparison or degree words.
When the occur in a string preceding the noun they are arranged on a very strict order
Adjectives may denote temporary or permanent properties, and depending on that they may appear in pre
or post-modifying positions
22. the only navigable river (permanent property) / the responsible man (trustworthy)
The only river navigable (transient property) / the man responsible (to blame)
Eg. Main, eventual, principal, utter, actual, favourite, former, mere, sole
25. The main purpose of his action has never been known. / *The purpose is main.
What we witnessed was an utter failure. /*The failure is utter.
Don’t overestimate the actual importance of the act./ *The importance of the act is actual.
PREDICATIVE ADJECTIVES
They select internal arguments (like verbs) to which they assign theta roles. They generally subcategorize
for PP, but the preposition is idiosyncratic, that is it cannot be predicted from the properties of the
adjective. Some adjectives subcategorize for IP (infinitives) or CPs.
30. capable of decision; conversant with the subject; lacking in intelligence; dependent on his family;
answearable to the Prime Minister
They behave like verbs in a number of ways, but do not inflect for Tense and Agreement. They take a
subjected hosted by [Spec,AP] and a complement to which they assign theta roles.This type of phrase is
assumed to be a small clause
Eg. Ablaze, afire, agog, aghast, afraid, asleep, akin, ajar, akimbo, alive, alike, alone, afloat, aware, awash, astir,
askew, averse, ashamed
2) prepositional adjectives which can never appear as pre-nominal modifiers, which nevertheless appear in a post-
modifying position
2) both predicative and modifying in one meaning and only modifying in the other meaning
37. She gave me a very civil answer. /Her answer was civil.
He specializes in civil engineering / *The engineering is civil.
3) adjectives such as old, new, wrong – when characterizing the refernt directly they are used
In both positions
a) Attributive – A is B
40. Mary is smart.
Bobby is a fresher.
The district is in a state of chaos.
The problem is that he sould leave.
b) Equative – A=B
41. The girl is John’s friend.
He is Secretary of State.
This girls is the most attractive of all.
2ND YEAR AAPLIED MODERN LANGUAGES – SYNTAX 1
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: ROXANA-CRISTINA PETCU, PhD
Traditionally, one-argument verbs minimally contain one NP, which generally appears in the subject position, but
the main problem seems to be related to the position of that argument in the argument frame of the verb, so the
problem is whether it is the external or the internal argument. The position of the argument has important
consequences for the syntactic behaviour of the verb.
One-argument verbs fall into two categories: a)unergatives and b)unaccusatives.
Eg. A) He may protest.
He overdosed.
He complained.
The children are swimming.
They were coughing because of the smoke.
B) There arose an unfortunate misunderstanding.
There came a cry of anguish from inside the house.
There appeared a ghostly face at the window.
In front of the house there stands a statue of the general.
There have arisen several problems.
A) Unergatives
Describe mainly volitional acts
The subject has control over the action, it is the initiator of the event, it is an Agent
The NP appearing with an unergative verb is its external argument
Is is not possible to have an postverbal imperative subject with unergatives
Eg. *Eat you up!
The past participles of unergative verbs cannot be used as adjectives in a post-head position
Eg. *The man talked to was a neighbour of mine.
The past participles of unergatives cannot be used as an adjective in a pre-head position
Eg, * The yawned student eventually fell asleep in class.
Unergatives evince the feature of atelicity, in other words they do not presuppose an end point
Eg. The boys cried with laughter.
Unergatives allow a so-called cognate object, an object which copies the semantic features of the verb and
which occupies the canonical position of the direct object, namely after the governing verb.
Eg. They slept the sleep of the just.
They died a heroic death.
She dreamt a nice dream.
B) Unaccusatives
The subject of unaccusatives undergoes a change of location or state and has no control over the action
The subject is not an Agent, it is generally assigned the theta-role Patient or Theme
The unique argument of an unaccusative verb is the internal argument
In Belfast English it is possible to have a postverbal imperative subject
Eg. Leave you now!
Arrive you before 6!
Be going you out of the door when he arrives!
The past participles of unaccusatives can be used as aadjectives in a post-head position
Eg, The train arrived at platform 5 is the London Express.
They arrested a businessman recently returned from Thailand.
The past participles of unaccusatives can be used as adjectives in a pre-head position
Eg. He is some kind of a fallen hero.
Unaccusatives evince the feature of telicity, namely they presuppose an end point.
Eg. The car had vanished from sight.
They do not allow a direct object
Eg. *The prices decreased cheese.
Unaccusatives co-occur with Resultative Constructions
Eg. The river froze solid.
UNERGATIVE VERBS
a) predicates describing willed or volitional acts: work, play, speak, talk, smile, grin, frown,
grimace, think, mediate, cogitate, daydream, skate, ski, swim, hunt, bicycle, walk, skip, jog,
quarrel, fight, wrestle, box, agree, disagree, knock, bang, hammer, pray, weep, cry, kneel, bow,
laugh, dance, crawl.
b) verbs denoting manners of speaking: whisper, shout, mumble, grumble, growl, bellow, etc
c) predicates describing sounds made by animals: bark, neigh, quack, roar, chirp, oink, mew, etc
d) verbs denoting involuntary bodily processes: cough, sneeze, hiccough, belch, burp, defecate, urinate,
sleep, cry, weep, etc
UNACCUSATIVE VERBS
A) burn, fall, drop, sink, float, slide, slip, glide, soar, flow, ooze, seep, trickle, drip, gush, hang, dangle, sway,
wave, tremble, shake, languish, flourish, thrive, drown, stumble, trip, roll, succomb, dry, boil, seethe,
lie(involuntarily), sit(involuntarily), bend(involuntarily),
B) inchoatives (verbs showing a process resulting in a change of state) : melt, freeze, evaporate, redden,
darken, yellow, rot, decompose, germinate, sprout, bud, wilt, wither, increase, decrease, blush, explode,
die, perish, choke, suffocate, scatter, disperse, vanish, disappear
C) verbs of existing and happening: exist, occur, happen, result, take place
D) aspectual predicates: begin, start, stop, cease, continue, end, etc
E) duratives: last, remain, stay, survive, etc
F) verbs denoting a non-voluntary emission of stimuli that has an impact on the senses : shine, sparkle,
glitter, glow, jingle, clink, clang, snap, crackle, pop, smell, stink, etc
G) verbs of existence: blaze, bubble, cling, coexist, correspond, decay, depend, drift, dwell, elapse, emanate,
exist, fester, float, flow, fly, grow, hide, hover, live, loom, lurk, overspread, persist, predominate, prevail,
project, protrude, revolve, reside, rise, shelter, settle, smoulder, spread, stream, survive, sweep, swing,
tower, wind
H) verbs of appearance: accumulate, appear, arise, awake, awaken, break, burst, dawn, derive, develop,
emerge, ensure, evolve, exude, flow, follow, gush, happen, issue, materialize, occur, plop, spill, steal, stem,
supervene, surge
This D-structure is in accordance with the case-assigning properties of the two classes of verbs.
Following Burzio’s generalization, a verb which lacks an external argument, in other words it is does not
assign an external theta role also fails to assign Accusative case. Therefore, the internal argument of
unaccusatives has to move out of the VP internal position in order to be assigned case. On the contrary,
unergatives, which have an external argument, can assign Accusative case under specific conditions.
Eg. (a)The ice melted . ICE is the internal argument of the verb melt, it undergoes a change
of state. So the verb is unaccusative.
(b) He dreamt a nice dream. The verb allows a cognate object to which it assigns
Accusative Case, therefore it is unergative.
TESTS FOR UNERGATIVITY/UNACCUSATIVITY
I.. There-insertion
Only unaccusatives (with the exception of verbs of change of state) and passive verbs can occur in
the there-insertion construction, unergatives are not allowed in this construction.
There V NP PP
This construction simply postulates the existence of some entity and it may contain no locative information.
Existential there used in this construction is just a presentative construction, which does not necessarily locate
in space. There is devoid of meaning, it is an expletive element. The internal argument of the verb must be
[-agentive], it cannot have any control over the action denoted by the verb. Such sentences usually express
‘coming into being’. (There began a riot. / *There ended a riot). Not all unaccusatives allow the there-insertion
construction. It is mainly verbs of existence (the state resulting from the appearance of some entity) and verbs of
appearance (coming into existence), which share the idea of existence. They also require a location argument, be it
overt or implicit, which means that these verbs have two internal arguments – one describing the entity that exist
(Theme) and the other one describing the location at which the entity exists (the location argument).Such verbs
lack a causative variant.
There occupies the subject position, so the internal argument of the unaccusative verb can remain after the verb.
There inverts with the auxiliary in question formation (Were there many children in the yard?)
There are unaccusatives derived from basically two argument-verbs causative predicates which become
intransitive and do not allow the there-insertion construction. The causative component of the predicate
disallows the there-insertion construction.
This construction need not be related to unaccusatives. There is a long list of verbs that can occur in this
construction. There in this construction carries a clear locative meaning.
Eg. A little boy darted into the room. / There darted into the room a little boy.
Verbs that can occur in this construction: amble, climb, crawl, creep, dance, dart, flee, float, fly, gallop, head,
hobble, hop, hurtle, jump, leap, march, plod, prance, ride, roam, roll, run, rush, sail, shuffle, skip, speed, stagger,
stray, stride, strut, swim, trot, trudge, walk.
C.Definiteness
Definite NPs, proper names and pronouns cannot normally be used as subjects of the there-insertion
constructions.
Indefinites are allowed as subjects in there-insertion constructions, while the postverbal NP had to
denote a discourse referent that is new to the hearer. (nouns preceded by an indefinite article, bare plurals,
nouns preceded by a cardinal number or by some)
Nevertheless, there may be other situations when not only indefinites are allowed as subjects of a there-insertion
construction:
There-insertion is allowed only with stage-level predicates, namely predicates which refer to unique,
individual events. There-insertion is not compatible with generic interpretations.
The set of sentences on the left refer to two unique, individual events – one person who was sick at some point in
time or three pigs who are loose at some point in time, whereas the set of sentences on the right have generic
interpretations, referring to the inherent qualities of the subjects (being tall or being stupid).
Conclusion
There has no meaning of its own
It is a semantically empty element, required for structural reasons – it fills the subject position
Its presence in the sentence is dependent of the presence of its associate, the postverbal NP, which must be
indefinite
It is a non-canonical construction in which the surface subject stays inside the VP and the sentence initial position
is occupied by a locative PP. It is a construction in which only unaccusatives can appear, unergatives and
transitives are ungrammatical. The most frequently used verbs are underived unaccusatives, namely verbs of
appearance and verbs of existence as well as verbs denoting position in space. Derived unaccusatives denoting a
definite change of state cannot be used in this configuration
(locative) PP V NP
Nevertheless, some unergatives can also be used in this configuration, namely verbs of manner of motion and
verbs of emission.
A resultative phrase is a phrase that denotes the state achieved by the NP argument of the verb as a result of the
action denoted by the verb. Such a phrase can be predicated only of the immediately postverbal NP, namely the
internal argument of the verb. In other words, only those verbs that have an internal argument are compatible
with Resultative phrases.
Unergatives have no internal argument, so theoretically they should not allow resultative constructions.
Unaccusatives do not occur in sentences with Resultatives phrases predicated of non-argumental NPs,
unlike unergatives that appear in such constructions.
Eg. *The log rolled [its bark off]. / The log rolled off.
*The cart rolled [the rubber off its wheels].
The two NPs which appear in a postverbal position are not arguments of the unaccusative verbs, they are not
subcategorized for by the verb, so they cannot enter a resultative phrase.
Unaccusatives can appear with resultative phrases without the mediation of a fake reflexive
Eg. * The water froze itself solid.
Generally speaking, the past participle of an unaccusative can be used as a noun modifier, both pre and post-
nominally, while the past participle of unergatives cannot.
The past participle of unaccusative describing atelic situations is incompatible with this position. Telic
unaccusatives are compatible with this construction.
Atelic unaccusatives – verbs of appearance, verbs of disappearance, verbs of inherently directed motion, verbs
denoting an internally caused change of state.
Ttelic unaccusatives fall into two categories: firstly (a) verbs depicting a change of state which can be
interpreted as a property (eg. Fallen leaves, blistered feet) and which are freely used as noun modifiers, and
secondly(b) verbs depicting a change of location or of place (?a fallen child) which are less felicitous as
noun modifiers.
2ND YEAR AAPLIED MODERN LANGUAGES – SYNTAX 1
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: ROXANA-CRISTINA PETCU, PhD
TRANSITIVE PREDICATES
We shall focus on the properties of a different class of predicates, namely transitive predicates.
a) bag, bottle, box, cage, can, corral, garage, jail, shelve (location)
b) bandage, bar, bell, blindfold, clothe, curtain, fund, saddle (locatum)
Eg. I put the glasses on the shelf. / I shelved the glasses. (LOCATION)
He fitted the saddle on the horse. / He saddled the horse. (LOCATUM)
The second sentences in the pairs above are syntactic counterparts of the analytic sentences containing put or fit.
The difference between the sentences in these pairs is that the preposition is not overt and the upper verbal head
which is occupied by put or fit in the first alternants in the examples above is also empty.
In the sentences allowing the Location alternation, the location (the NP inside the PP indicating location) becomes
a verb in the monotransitive variant of the sentence, In the sentence allowing the Locatum alternation, the Direct
Object of the ditransitive sentence becomes a verb in the monotransitive sentence, as the DO indicates the object
to be located somewhere.
Eg. John corralled the cows. (put the cows in the corral)
*John cowed the corral.
Derived unaccusatives
One argument verbs, namely the internal one, a Theme which is projected in the object position at D-
structure and moves to the Subject position at S-structure to be assigned case, as the intransitive
counterpart is unaccusative, it lacks an external argument, therefore cannot case-mark the internal
argument.
The transitive variant is causative.
They do not allow there-insertion (*There sank a ship.)
One can prove that such verbs are unaccusatives, namely that they lack an agent role since we cannot insert an
instrument role which is licensed only if an agent is present overtly or implicitly.
Unaccusatives cannot control PRO (indicate the identity of PRO). Generally, PRO can be controlled if the original
role exists, which is not the case of unaccusatives.
PRO is controlled by the subject of the verb in the matrix clause, in the sense that we can identify the empty
category PRO, the subject of the non-finite infinitive with the help of the overt subject of the verb want, the two
being identical. With unaccusatives it is not possible.
This sentence cannot possible be interpreted as meaning that those who put the babies in bed as also the ones that
roll/turn them, therefore control is not possible.
These two tests prove that such verbs do not have a causative structure.
Not all transitives have an ergative counterpart. There are transitive verbs that only select an agent as their
external theta role, but there are other transitives that select other roles as external arguments.
Eg.(a) The baby ate the soup. /*The spoon ate the soup. /*Hunger ate the soup
The barber shaved father. / *The razor shaved father.
(b) [Mike]agent opened the door. / [The key]instrument opened the door. / [The wind]cause opened the door.
Verbs that have similar selectional properties – roll, redden, break, drown, enlarge
Causality plays an important role in deciding thematic structures. There is an overlap between Cause and Agent in
the sense that if an argument is the agent of a change of state it is also the cause of that change. The main
difference between agency and causality may be stated as the fact that agentivity involves properties of volition
and intention where as causality does not. If the verb is specified for both causality and agency (volition, intention)
(like eat, shave) it can only select an Agent. If a verb is specified only for causality (like open, break) it can select
both and agent and an instrument (cause) as external argument. In other words, only those transitives that are
specified only for causality, but not for volition, intention enter the ergative alternation.
Eg. Thin, narrow, cool, thicken, harden, soften, widen, lengthen, shorten, broaden, loosen, tighten, darken,
redden, deepen, lower, enlarge
De-adjectival verbs also have analytical counterparts which can be either transitive or intransitive.
Eg. The leaves turned red./ The cold turned the leaves red.
The liquid froze solid. / We froze the liquid solid.
The safe blew open. / The charge blew the safe open.
The first sentence may be interpreted as a sentence containing a copula-like verb which subcategorizes for a small
clause, that is in fact a resultative phrase. Such sentences may be interpreted as describing a change resulting in a
state. (The cold does something such that the leaves come to be red.
Eg. The horse jumped over the fence./The rider jumped the horse over the fence./
The dog walked./ I walked the dog. /
More restrictive – only intransitive agentive verbs of manner of motion (in the presence of a directional
phrase) are allowed to be used transitively
Eg. Drive, fly, gallop, leap, march, race, run, swim, walk, etc
The causee is generally an animate entity induced to act by the causer
Eg. She hurried him to the door.
He was running the horse down the hill.
Other instances of causative alternation
Other basically intransitive verbs which denote internally controlled actions can, in certain cases be used
transitively, when externally controlled.
All the verbs in the sentences above are inherently intransitive verbs recategorized as transitive causative
verbs.
A.1. motion verbs – amble, dance, float, gallop, hurry, jump. march, quiver, retire, roll, run, tumble, walk
B.1. [-animate], [-abstract]DO and an obligatory Adv of Place. The DO usually has an instrumental meaning.
Eg. She leant her elbows on the table (she caused her elbows to lean on the table)
She stayed her arms on her knees.
She struck her hand against a stone.
She dabbed a powder-puff across her forehead.
Phrasal transitives
Eg. Bob put his coat on.
Bob put on his coat.
Ditransitives – verbs which take an external argument and two internal arguments, the first one
functioning as a direct object and the second one as an indirect onject, which has the role of Goal or
Beneficiary.
The two objects are obligatory arguments.
We shall see that there is a difference of interpretation between the prepositional variant and the double
object construction.
verbs which involve causation of a change of possession allow the Dative alternation.
Eg. (1) The teacher gave bad marks to the students. (Goal)
The teacher gave the students bad marks.
(2) She made a shirt for her niece. (Beneficiary)
*She made her niece a skirt.
Classes of verbs denoting causation of change of possession which enter the Dative Alternation
A) give verbs – give, pass, sell, pay, loan, serve, feed, lease, lend, refund, rent, repay, trade
B) verbs of future having - offer, promise, leave, forward, allocate, assign, advance, grant,
award, allot, concede, issue, leave, owe, vote.
C) verbs of throwing - bash, bat, flick, fling, hurl, hit, kick, pass, pitch, shoot, slam, slap, sling,
throw, tip, toss
BUT – verbs of Latinate origin cannot occur in the double object construction, even if they denote change
of possession
Eg, donate, contribute, convey, distribute, transposrt, transfer, address, porpel, release, explain, describe,
portray, narrate, demonstrate, dictate, recite, etc.
BUT – verbs of future having and verbs of communication occur in the double object construction even if
they are of Latin origin
Eg. bequeath, refer, recommend, guarantee, permit, radio, telegraph, telephone, etc
Other verbs which are compatible with the change of possession concept, but do not allow
the double object construction
1) manner of speaking verbs – babble, bark, bellow, chant, call, murmur, roar, whisper, yell, stammer,
grumble, etc
3) miscellaneous – entruct, present, provide, supply, credit, furnish, carry, pull, push, lift, lower, raise
Eg. She brought disaster to the village. / *She brought the village disaster.
She brought a book to Mary. / She brought Mary a book.
The PrepNP [+animate] - needs to be recognized as a potential possessor.
Verbs of creation – in a general sense enter the Benefactive alternation; the DO – an effected object
Build verbs – arrange, assemble, blow, build, carve, knit, embroider, forge(metal), hammer,roll, sculpt, compile
Prepare verbs – mix, blend, cook, bake, boil, brew, fix, toast, toss, grind, light, clear, fry, iron, poach,
pour, prepare, roast, scamble, wash
Get verbs – book, buy, cash, catch, fetch, find, gather, hire, lease, leave, order, phone, pick, pluck,
procure, pull, reach, rent, reserve, save, secure, slaughter, sreal, vote
Create verbs – design, dig, mint
Verbs of performance – dance, play, sing, spin, whistle,
LMA – 2nd YEAR
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: ROXANA-CRISTINA PETCU, PhD
THE PASSIVE
Complex linguistic phenomenon, which manifests itself at three levels of linguistic analysis:
a) the morphological level – the auxiliaries be and get and the past participle of the verb
b) the syntactic level – a change in position and status of the active Subject and Object
c)the semantic level – a change in the relation between the underlying role-structure of the sentence and its
organization. The agent(subject) no longer appears in the subject position in the sentence, while the patient (the
object) appears in subject position.
Stylistically speaking, the Passive makes the discourse more objective, what is important is not the agent
anymore, but the event denoted by the verb itself.
The Passive Morphology – be + the past participle. Passive verbs behave like unaccusative verbs. The
external theta role of the verb that undergoes passivization is absorbed by the passive morphology, namely
the past participle of the verb. The verb is generated from the Lexicon as passive, that is as an unaccusative
that only has an internal argument which has to move to the Subject position in order to be assigned case
and also to satisfy the Extended Projection Principle. Being an unaccusative verb it does not theta-mark an
external argument so it cannot assign Accusative case. The internal argument moves to the Subject
position and is assigned Nominative Case. The external argument of the original active verb can be
recovered in the passive sentence as a prepositional phrase headed by the preposition BY which assigns it
the theta role Agent as well as case or it can be implicit.
Conditions on the Passive – the adjacency constraint(the double object construction; the dative verbs)
(even with non-arguments of the verb)
Ditransitive verbs ( change of possession, the Indirect Object is a beneficiary; both objects may undergo
Passivization )
Eg. (1)He gave the flowers to Mary
The flowers were given to Mary.
Passivization of the Indirect Object – only after Dative movement (adjacency constraint)
(2) She gave a book to me. / A book was given to me. / *I was given a book to.
She gave me a book. / I was given a book. / *A book was given me.
Ditransitives (no change of possession, the Indirect Object is not a beneficiary, but an Experiencer, only
the IO can be passivised)
Eg. He gave me a push,
I was given a push.
*A push was given to me.
Idiomatic phrases
Eg. Take strong exception to smth; make an example of smth; foist all one’s problems on smth; pin one’s faith
on smth; make too much of smth; keep close tabs on smth; take advantage of smth,; etc
Eg. They made an example of his behaviour.
His behaviuour was made an example of.
NO Passive:
reciprocal verbs – resemble, marry
eg. Music resembles poetry.
*Poetry is resembles by music
state verbs (verbs of possession) – have, possess, own
eg. He owns a house.
*The house is owned by him.
(verbs of feelings) – love, hate, loathe, abhor
Eg. He loves Mary.
*Mary is loved by him.
Reflexives
Eg. Mary admired herself in the mirror.
*Herself was admired by Mary in the mirror.
no idiomatic IT ( This argument eats it. / *IT is eaten by this argument.
Middles
Eg. The poem reads easily./ Tennis balls sell best in summer./ The play reads better than it acts../ This fabric
washes easily./ Cotton shirts iron well./ These figures add easily.
they are one argument verb, the agent is not overt in the sentence.It may be understood as ‘one’ or ‘people in
general’,
Unaccusatives do not have an external argument, not even an implicit one, so they can co-occur with all by
itself, in the sense that something happens without external aid, agentlessly, unlike middles.
Eg. The boat sank all by itself.
*The play acts well all by itself.
The meaning contribution of the subject of a middle sentence is different from the meaning contribution of
the subject in a passive sentence, as the theta roles assigned to the subjects of a middle sentence are very
different.
Eg. The book reads easily. (It can be paraphrased as “the book has the necessary properties that allow
it to read easily.Somehow the subject is responsible for the action
denoted by the verb.)
The book was easily read.
In an unaccusative sentence the subject cannot be interpreted as responsible because it refers to a concrete entity.
So, the subject of a middle sentence is an entity, a non-Agent which is responsible for the action denoted by the
verb, in the sense that it has the necessary properties which make the situation denoted by the verb possible. In a
middle sentence, the Agent is semantically present, but syntactically absent.
Middles are generic sentences that do not describe particular events in time. They are seen as stative, atelic
predicates, like individual level predicates. They are compatible with always and incompatible with the
progressive. When they occur in the progressive they denote a change between successive stages. They do
not occur in the imperative.
Middle generally occur with obligatory modifications. It can be a Manner Adverbial, a Locative Adverbial, a
clausal modifier (non-purpose), a negative operator or an overt modal verb. The role of the modifier is to
stativize the predicate.
Middle Formation
Only transitive verbs that have an affected argument enter Middle Formation. Effected objects cannot
occur in a middle sentence
Only activities and accomplishments occur in middle sentences, stative verbs and aachievements do not
allow middle formation.
Only transitives that allow an Agent, an Instrument or a Cause in subject position enter Middle Formation.
I. Mention the most important properties of the English Middles and provide examples.
II. Explain why the sentences below are ungrammatical:
1. *Such deeds do not admit easily.2.*Such stories do not tell fast.3.Politicians praise a lot on TV. 4.*Exams forget
easily. 5.*This kind of bread buys easily. 6. *Innocent victims murder easily.7.*Clever people like instantly.8.*This
aim achieves with difficulty. 9.*Fish cooks obviously.
III. Can the following verbs occur in middle sentences?
FLOAT, ROLL, BLOW, KICK, PULL, PUSH, BOMBARD, SHOWER, STONE, WATER, BREAK.
IV. Translate into English using middles wherever possible:
1. Aparatura de uz caznic se vinde foarte bine de sărbători.2. Se cumpără case în draci primăvara şi toamna.3.Am
dat peste un text absolut oribil.Pur şi simplu nu se traduce orice ai face. 4.Am să-mi cumpăr materialul
acesta.Vânzătoarea spune că se spală şi se calcă foarte bine.5.M-am uitat la anunţurile din ziar după un
apartament mai mic de închiriat, căci, după cum se ştie apartamentele mici se închiriază mai repede deci sunt mai
greu de găsit. 6.Dă-mi nişte lipici, te rog. Timbrele acestea nu se lipesc de loc pe plic şi trebuie să dau scrisoarea
curierului care aşteaptă pe hol.7. Vilele sunt mai spaţioase decât casele obişnuite dar se vând mai greu deoarece
preţurile sunt foarte mari. 8.Chiar şi pentru mine care sunt o gospodină fără experienţă albuşul şi gălbenuşul se
pot separa uşor.9. Brânza se rade uşor aşa că nu ai de ce să te plăngi.Poţi să pui cât de multă la spaghete fără mare
efort.10. Problema se poate rezolve uşor, nu te mai complica atât.
VI. Mention the constraints on the Passive and provide examples.
VII. Explain the differences between the BE passive and the GET passive (Refer to sentences such as
Mary got fired, the fool! / Mary was fired last week)
VIII. Passivize the sentences below (if possible. If there is no passive counterpart explain why):
1.The newcomer solved the puzzle.2 He wrote the letter rapidly.3. Music resembles poetry.4. He owns a house.
5.He loves Mary. 6. Mary admired herself in the mirror.7. He gave the flowers to Mary. 8.He gave me a push,9. He
insisted upon the invitation.10.They talked about the movie.11. The two tickets cost $100.12. The book belongs to
me.13. The house stands by the hill.14. He availed himself of the opportunity. 15.They did away with that law.16.
They made an example of his behaviuor. 17.The minister took strong exception to the position put forth by the
opposition. 18. The teacher made too much of your attitude during the exam. 19. The secret police kept close tabs
on the members of that terrorist organisation. 20. Somebody has sat on the chair. 21. The manager heard her
talking to the stockbroker. 22. We saw him cross the street.23. The town was dancing with light and
shadow.24.The filled the freezer with fish. 25. They have decided on this chair. 26. It stormed up a flood last night.
27. I took a picture of Mary. 28. Your presence there surprised me. 29. The force of the blizzard took us by
surprise. 30. My family possess this flat. 31.His grandfather left him about $100,000.32.The hooligans set upon
the old man and beat him up.33.She doesn’t like it if people criticize her.34.They have done away with trams in
England.35.I don’t think the police are doing anything about it.36.They were giving a concert in the hall when a
large piece of plaster fell down from the ceiling. It injured about fifty people seriously enough for the ambulance
men to take them to hospital.37.I have him a cheque for the amount required.38.The magistrate let him off with a
severe reprimand.39.They had evacuated the Cathedral before the spire collapsed, so it did not hurt
anyone.40.They look after you very well in that hotel.41.The police eventually gave up the search for the missing
men.42.Some girls love it if men pay them compliments.43.Someone gave me this pen for Christmas.44.Everyone
was listening to the news bulletin with avid interest.45.They told him curtly to go away.46.They are now building a
new cinema there.47.I assure you that the authorities are investigating your complaint.48.Some people object if
others make them work hard.49.I hate it when people make fun of me, though I don’t mind it if they tease
me.50.My sister’s fiancé is cooking dinner tonight. It smells all right anyway.51.He left without anyone noticing
him.52.He is tired of other people sponging him on.53.People believe the authorities accused them of planning an
armed revolt. 54.They swamped the ordinary voters with information about the candidates.55.Provided we do not
press the terms to far, we can identify the Republicans as the American conservatives and the Democrats as the
liberals.56.The law fixes the dates of the American presidential elections and there is no margin for
discretion.57.The voters mandate each member of the electoral college in advance. 58. They expect the Congress
will appoint him leader of the party.59.Somebody broke the vase during the party.60.Some crazy kids destroyed
my neighbour’s car last night.
IX. Translate into English:1.Nu se păstrează nici o dovadă referitoare la vizita pe care spune că a făcut-o la
Paris în 1978.2.Cum îni expirase viza mi s-a interzis să mai intru în ţară.3.Va fi aşteptat la aeroport?4.Directorului
I s-a trimis o invitaţie din partea consilului administrativ să se prezinte pe data de 20 ale lunii şi să justifice
propunerile ce fuseseră făcute privind modificarea organigramei întreprinderii.5.Mare parte din ce s-a spus la
întrunire a fost notat în procesul verbal.6.Operaţia la care a fost supus a durat 6 ore.7.S-a auzit un strigăt la celălat
capăt al coridorului şi s-a văzut o umbră neagră prelingându-se pe perete.8.Hotărârea ei de a nu se căsători cu acel
domn a fost aprobată de întreaga familie.9.Foarte multe obiecte de artă deosebit de valoroase s-au distrus în
timpul cutremurului.10. Se ştie că nimeni nu putea să-l sufere când era preşedintele acelei fundaţii.11.S-a acceptat
în general idea că cele mai multe IMM-uri din domeniul transporturilor sunt localizate în zonele de sud, centru şi
sud vest.12.În ultimul an s-a înregistrat o scădere accentuată a realizărilor economice ale zonei.13.După un timp
am pierdut vaporul din vedere.14.Nu-mi vine să cred că aceste obiecte de îmbrăcăminte au fost purtate de Regina
Maria.15.Cum treceam pe lângă tejghea mi s-a dat un platou şi am fost rugată să-l aduc la masă.16.Situaţia a fost
prezentată în faţa membrilor adunării generale cărora li s-a cerut să ia o hotărâre urgentă pentru ca lucrurile să
poată fi remediate cât mai curând cu putinţă.17.Se pare că s-a descoperit un nou medicament pentru a lupta
contra cazurilor de astm la copii.18.Este posibil ca în următoarele câteva zile să fie eliberat un nou grup de
prizonieri politici.19.Aproape întreg programul conferinţei a fost alocat unui raport despre situaţia din Irak.20.Nu
ştiu cum , dar în cele din urmă am fost convinsă să-mi cumpăr o motocicletă.21.S-a căzut de accord să se amâne
întrunirea.22.Toată lumea se aştepta ca daunele să fie deosebit de mari.23.Se vede clar că preţurile au crescut
vertiginos în luna septembrie.24.S-a luat hotărârea să se construiască un nou drum comunal.25.Ni s-a comunicat
că minsitrul de finanţe şi-a dat demisia.26.Încă nu s-a admis official că situaţia dramatică a învăţământului
superior românesc este cauzată în mare parte se subfinanţarea cronică.27.Actualmente există opinia că
informaţiile sunt transmise la creier de către diverse substanţe chimice.28.Se crede că mai există încă multe
obstacole în calea procesului de pace din Orientul Apropiat.29.În 1981 se cunoştea doar existenţa a doi specialişti
în acea boală extrem de rară în toată lumea.30.S-a formulat acuzaţia că pârâtul ar fi fost implicat într-un jaf armat.