COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE HUMRIET-HUMAN

Bautista, Sean G. HOLY ANGEL EDUCATION & FORENSICS (CCJEF) RIGHTS AND
FS-301 UNIVERSITY ETHICS-5074
BACHELOR OF FORENSIC SCIENCE
Contrast and compare “Writ of Habeas Corpus” with that of “Writ of
Amparo”

The writ of habeas corpus states that the judge must deliver the person charged with a
crime into the courtroom to face the allegations. In other words, the accused is being re-called to
court, as well as a document authorized by a court ordering a private individual or government
official to present the body of a prisoner or detainee at an indicated time or place to verify
whether the arrest or imprisonment was legal. in order for the reasons for their detainment and
the process that led to their incarceration could be evaluated and arguably contested It is one of
the most fundamental rights a citizen has to control or distinguish abuses of governmental
authority, and it is thus one of the most intently protected civil processes. While the writ of
Amparo is defined as a solution obtainable to anyone whose right to life, liberty, and security has
been infringed or is threatened by an unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee,
or of a private individual or entity.

The difference between the two is that the writ of habeas corpus is intended to enact the
right to liberty of the individual, and it is an authorization from a higher court directing a lower
court or government official to take a specific response in accordance with the law. The primary
goal of the writ of habeas corpus is to avoid and limit detention without trial. The basic notion of
habeas corpus is the demand to bring the person to court to evaluate if the detention is justified,
not to hold the detainee indefinitely without cause or charge, and to correctly resolve the matter.
Writ of Amparo, on the other hand, is intended to protect those other fundamental human rights
enacted in the Constitution but not protected by the writ of habeas corpus. The writ of Amparo
restricts respondents from using the defense of simple denial, and evidence or documents are
required to support claims that they did not violate the offended party's rights to life, liberty, or
security. The likeness of writ of habeas corpus and writ of Amparo is that both are protecting the
human rights of every individual in such civil and criminal cases. They aims to protect the right
to life, liberty, and security.

Page 1 of 1