Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Correspondence To Governor Tomblin (Signed Scan) - 20110810-JAP
Correspondence To Governor Tomblin (Signed Scan) - 20110810-JAP
VIA
FACSIMILE AND
REGULAR MAIL
Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor State Capitol 1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East Charleston, West Virginia 25305
Re:
Redistricting
My client:
Dear Governor
Tomblin:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Monroe County Commission who have retained me to respectfully request that you veto House
Bill 106 which changes the apportionment of the members of the The basis for this request is that the House of Delegates. provisions of this Bill are unconstitutional as applied to Monroe
County.
It is the understanding of the Commission that this Bill, as passed by the Legislature and sent to your office, will carve Monroe County into three separate delegate districts which will be shared with Mercer County, Summers County and Greenbrier County,
respectively.1 Under the prior apportionment scheme Monroe County had been kept completely intact as part of the 26th District (along
with part of Summers County). However, Monroe County citizens will now have a substantially lower population total in each of the
xThe northern end of Monroe County will be included with Greenbrier County as part of the 42nd District where there will
be a population disparity of 33,589 to 5,294 in favor of
Greenbrier County. The southern end of our county will now go with Mercer County as part of the 27th District where it will be outnumbered by a total of 55,513 to 2,826. The middle part of our county will now be aligned with the entirety of Summers
Jeffry A. Pritt
Attorney at Law
three new districts that have been created, and our county is not
guaranteed a delegate from any one of these Districts.
Furthermore,
my review
of
the
Constitution
of
West
Virginia
levels are
It is certainly
true that this requirement may not be accomplished in a manner which violates the equal protection requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See generally, Goines v. Rockefeller. 338 F.Supp. 1189 (S.D.W.Va. 1972). However, it is equally clear that these objectives may be achieved in a manner
which violates neither the United States or West Virginia Constitutions. See generally, Goines v. Heiskell. 362 F.Supp. 313
(S.D.W.Va. 1973).
boundary lines as applied to Monroe County. Most importantly, it fails to include any residency requirement by which Monroe County
will be guaranteed a delegate from at least one of the three new
This is clearly in
set forth in the
Moreover,
and
perhaps
most
disturbing,
is
that
there
was
absolutely no reason for Monroe County to have been affected by the reapportionment of delegates this time around. The population of
Jeffry a. Pritt
Attorney at Law
Governor
the previous 26th District was absolutely stable, having lost only a total of 49 persons since the 2000 census.3 The 2010 population
of the District was 18,021, which is well within the tolerance
levels required to satisfy equal protection concerns (and much closer to the preferred number than many of the new districts which
have been proposed) . And, the 26th District kept the boundary lines of Monroe County completely intact thereby respecting important
political, historical and natural boundaries which have now been
ignored.4
the 26th District demonstrates that the creation of a district in our area which meets all constitutional requirements - both of the United States and West Virginia Constitutions is not a
difficult task.
The Monroe County Commission sincerely regrets requesting that this Bill be vetoed, but if it is enacted then our county will have no voice in our Legislature for the first time in the history of
change in the population for the entire district which encompasses the federal prison grounds in both counties.
To my knowledge, the
which were included in the 26th District along with Monroe County have not opposed the continuation of that district.
Jeffry A. Pritt
Attorney at Law
Governor
our state.5 Obviously, it would be much easier to correct this deficiency now. This is a grave injustice to Monroe County, and one which is constitutionally deficient. Consequently, since the Legislature has chosen to ignore the rights of our citizens, it is the Commission's sincere hope that you will act to veto this Bill and send it back to the Legislature
with instructions to reinstate the 26''' District as it was, and to reapportion delegates in those areas of the state where there has
been
an
actual
population
change.6
Thank
you
for
your
consideration of this matter. I would also welcome the opportunity to further discuss the issues involving Monroe County with your
legal counsel.
Very truly you-rs,
cc:
J.
Crosier
B. Boggs M. Caputo
R. Canterbury
J. Frazier
R. M.
Moye Staggers
counties who dominate the population, and our proposed new senatorial district will be controlled by Fayette and Greenbrier counties. Since we have virtually no hope of having an elected senator from our county it makes our single seat in the House all that more important so we at least have one voice in Charleston.
assigned responsibility for our area, so that they will be advised of the position of the Monroe County Commission with
regard to this important matter.