Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 56

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


(IPCRF) PART I-IV

This form is an Excel-based version of the Part I-IV of the Individual Performance Commitment and
Review Form (IPCRF) as prescribed in the DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015. It is intended to assist Teachers/Ratees in the
preparation of their IPCRF forms at different RPMS phases, e.g. Individual Performance Commitment and Review
Form (IPCRF) and Development Plan during Performance Planning and Commitment phase, accomplished IPCRF
with computed final rating during Performance Review and Evaluation phase. The data gathered using this tool will
help the Rater in identifying the needs of teachers and in providing appropriate interventions.

This tool shall be accomplished by each teacher. When all Parts I-IV are accomplished, the teacher
should print and submit this tool, with the Portfolio, to the Rater for final review and assessment.

OVERVIEW
Please open this Workbook with Microsoft Excel 2010 or later. The Excel Workbook has 11 viewable sheets:
• READ THIS
• Encoding Sheet-Proficient (green-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 1-Proficient (green-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 2-Proficient (green-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 3-Proficient (green-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 4-Proficient (green-colored sheet tab)
• Encoding Sheet-Highly Proficient (blue-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 1-Highly Proficient (blue-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 2-Highly Proficient (blue-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 3-Highly Proficient (blue-colored sheet tab)
• IPCRF-Part 4-Highly Proficient (blue-colored sheet tab)

READ THIS
This sheet contains information about the tool and how to use it.

Encoding Sheet-Proficient & Encoding Sheet-Highly Proficient


The sheet is partially locked and only certain parts (Information box on top, spaces for ratings, and name of Approving
Authority at the bottom) are unlocked for encoding. This is where you will encode the ratings that you have obtained in all
the Classroom Observation periods (COT 1-2) as reflected in the Classroom Observation Tool (COT) Rating Sheets, and/or
from the Supplementary Materials/TRFs you have provided in applicable Objectives. This is where you will also encode your
IPCRF rating (Quality/Q) for the other objectives. The sheet automatically computes for the average transmuted rating of
your ratings, which will be the rating for Quality for the classroom observable objectives in the RPMS. The final ratings are
automatically reflected in the IPCRF-Part 1 and IPCRF-Part 3.

IPCRF-Part 1-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 1-Highly Proficient


The sheet automatically generates after encoding in the Encoding Sheet. NO MORE EDITING IS ALLOWED ON THIS SHEET.

IPCRF-Part 2-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 2-Highly Proficient


This sheet contains the Core Behavioral Competencies, where you will encode the results of the assessment of your core
behavioral competencies. Indicate the total number of competency indicators that you have demonstrated during the
performance cycle in the space provided. The sheet is partially locked and only the spaces where will you encode the
number (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) of competencies for each category of Core Behavioral Competencies are unlocked for encoding.
There are six (6) categories of core behavioral competencies (e.g. Self-Management, Professionalism and Ethics).

IPCRF-Part 3-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 3-Highly Proficient


This sheet, the Individual Performance Commitment Review Form Summary Sheet, shows your IPCRF rating (Quality/Q) per
objective, your Average and Score per Objective, and your Final Rating for the performance cycle. Data in this sheet are
automatically generated from the encoded information and ratings in the IPCRF-Part 1 sheet. ONLY THE COLORED CELLS
(see note on the sheet) should be edited.

IPCRF-Part 4-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 4-Highly Proficient


This sheet will contain your IPCRF-Development Plan. This sheet is completely unlocked. Use this sheet to encode your
strengths and development needs, and the corresponding action plan, timeline, and resources needed based on the results
of your e-SAT prior to the RPMS Cycle. You may update your Development Plan based on the results of your performance
review and evaluation during RPMS Phase IV.

HOW TO USE

A. Opening the Workbook


1. Open the Excel Workbook with Microsoft Excel 2010 or later.

2. Click Enable editing when a prompt appears.

3. Click Enable Macros or Enable Content when a prompt appears.

4. Click Update when a prompt appears.

5. Read and understand all the contents of this 'READ THIS' Sheet, then click Begin at the bottom to start.

B. Encoding IPCRF Ratings (in the Encoding Sheet & IPCRF-Part 3)


1. Encode all required information at the uppermost portion of the sheet. Input the Name of Employee/Ratee,
Position, Bureau/Center/Service/Division, Rating Period, Name of Rater, Position of Rater, Date of Review. Type also the
name of the Approving Authority at the bottom of the sheet.

2. Input your all Ratings for the Classroom Observation period(s) you have been observed, and/or Ratings for
the Supplementary Materials/TRFs you have provided in applicable Objectives. The Sheet computes for the transmuted
RPMS Rating for Quality for the classroom-observable Objectives based on the ratings that you encoded (e.g., from at least
1 COT/Supp Material/TRF and up to at most 2). If you only have 1 COT/Supp Material/TRF, you just need to encode the
ratings under COT/Supp Material/TRF 1. Leave COT/Supp Material/TRF 2 blank. Input the Q ratings for the other objectives.
Note that only a certain number of cells are editable on this sheet and these cannot be blank.

3. Double check if all ratings in the necessary Q columns are filled in on both the Encoding Sheet, and IPCRF-
Part 3. Take NOTE of and follow the instructions found on the right side of some objectives. Ensure that Final Numerical and
Adjectival Ratings reflect on the space at the bottom of the sheet.

C. Accomplishing the Competencies Part of the IPCRF


1. Open the IPCRF-Part 2 sheet to begin encoding.

2. Input the number of competency indicators (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) for each of the 6 categories of Core
Behavioral Competencies that you have demonstrated during the performance cycle.

D. Preparing the Development Plans


1. Open the IPCRF-Part 4 sheet to begin encoding.

2. Encode your strengths and development needs for both the Functional Competencies (RPMS Objectives in
Part I) and the Core Behavioral Competencies (in Part II).

3. Input your corresponding action plan (including the Learning Objectives and Interventions), timeline, and
resources needed.

E. Submitting IPCRF Parts I-IV to your Rater


Print all 4 sheets: IPCRF-Parts 1-4 that you have accomplished, in the required number of copies. Submit these
to your Rater, together with your RPMS Portfolio. There will be a face-to-face validation of the IPCRF between the Ratee and
the Rater. T1-T3? MT1-MT4?
Begin. Begin.

Devel oped by:

ANGELO D. UY
School Principal II
Biñan City Science and Technology High School
Schools Division Office of Biñan City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) ENCODING SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: IVY MAY B. TORREON Name of Rater: NYMPHA P. DIEZ


Position: TEACHER I Position: ACADEMIC HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:DIVISION OF BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: July 11, 2022
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

Weight COT/Supp COT/Supp


per COT Indicator No. Material/TRF 1 Material/TRF 2 Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives
Objectiv (Set)
Score FOR OBJ 7-10:
COT RPMS 5-pt COT RPMS 5-pt Pls save as using this format
e Rating Scale Rating Scale Q E T Ave Accomplish ONLY example:
Objective 1 5% 1 7 5 7 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 the white
5 cells on Cuneta_Sharon_B_IPCR2021-2022
KRA 1 20% Objective 2 5% 5 5,000 0,250 (for auto page name/number)
Objective 3 5% 2 7 5 7 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 the SET5 (A or B)
Objective 4 5% 3 7 5 7 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 that you
5 used.
Objective 5 5% 4 6 4 7 5 5 5,000 0,250 4 5 4,5
Objective 6 5% 5 7 5 7 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 Leave5the other SET
SET A
5 4 5 5,000 0,250 5 4
blank.4,5Delete
Objective 7 5% 6 (Supp Material) IN PRINTING
KRA 2 20%
0,000 0,000
content of Column
SET B (COT) 7 5 7 5 5 5 5 0,5 0,8 HEADER
SET A K (Quality Rating),
5 0,000 0,000 0 5 5
Objective 8 5% 7 (Supp Material) Column N (Ave)
SET B (COT) 7 5 7 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 and Column
5 O 0,6 MARGIN 0,6
Objective 9 5% SET A (COT) 0 0 0,000 0,000 0 0 #DIV/0!
8
SET B (TRF) 5 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 (Score)5 0,5
SET A (COT) 0 0 0,000 0,000 0 0 corresponding
#DIV/0! 0,8 FOOTER
KRA 3 20% Objective 10 5% 9
SET B (TRF) 5 5 5 5,000 0,250 5 5 5
to ADJUST TO 95% NORMAL SIZE
Objective 11 5% 4 4,000 0,200 the Set that YOU
Objective 12 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 13 5% 4 4,000 0,200
DID NOT USE. PAPER SIZE:
Objective 14 5% 4 4,000 0,200 FINAL & FOLIO 8.5 X 13
Objective 15 5% 4 4,000 0,200
KRA 4 30%
Objective 16 5% 4 4,000 0,200
ADJECTIVAL
Objective 17 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 18 5% 4 4,000 0,200
KRA 5 10% Objective 19 10% 4 4,000 0,400
Final Rating 4,500
Adjectival Rating Outstanding

IVY MAY B. TORREON NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C. MADAMBA


Ratee Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS I-III

Name of Employee: IVY MAY B. TORREON Name of Rater: NYMPHA P. DIEZ


Position: TEACHER I Position: ACADEMIC HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DIVISION OF BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: July 11, 2022
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content 1. Applied SY 2021- 5% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 7
5
Knowledge and knowledge of 2022 Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective Level 3 in Objective in Objective 1 as
shown in the COT
Pedagogy content within 1 as shown in the 1 as shown in the 1 as shown in the 1 as shown in the 1 as shown in the rating sheets/inter-
and across COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating
20% observer agreement
curriculum sheets/inter- sheets/inter- sheets/inter- sheets/inter- sheets/inter- forms.
teaching areas. observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement
forms. forms. forms. forms. forms OR No
acceptable
Basic Education Services

evidence was
shown.

2. Used SY 2021- 5% Quality Used research- Used research- Used research- Use of research- No acceptable Used research-based
5
knowledge and/or
research-based 2022 based knowledge based knowledge based knowledge based knowledge evidence was
principles of teaching in
knowledge and and/or principles of and/or principles of and/or principles of and/or principle of shown all the components of
principles of teaching in all the teaching in two teaching in one teaching and instruction in the lesson
teaching and components of components of components of learning is plan to improve student
learning to instruction in the instruction in the instruction in the identified but was learning

enhance lesson plan to lesson plan to lesson plan to poorly used as


professional improve student improve student improve student basis for
practice. learning learning learning planning/designin
g the lesson

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 3 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content 3. Displayed SY 2021- 5% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 7
5
Knowledge and proficient use of 2022 Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective Level 3 in Objective in Objective 3 as
shown in COT rating
Pedagogy Mother Tongue, 3 as shown in COT 3 as shown in COT 3 as shown in COT 3 as shown in COT 3 as shown in COT sheets/inter-observer
Filipino and rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter-
20% agreement forms
English to observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement
facilitate teaching forms forms forms forms forms OR No
and learning. acceptable
evidence was
shown.

4. Used effective SY 2021- 5% Quality Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level 7 in 5
verbal and non- 2022 7 in Objective 4 as 6 in Objective 4 as 5 in Objective 4 as 4 in Objective 4 as 3 in Objective 4 as Objective 4 as shown
in COT rating
verbal classroom shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT sheets/inter-agreement
strategies to rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- forms
support learner agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
understanding, OR No acceptable
participation, evidence was
engagement and shown.
achievement.

2. Learning 5. Established SY 2021- 5% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demostrated Level Demonstrated Level 7 5
in Objective 5 as
Environment safe and secure 2022 Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective 3 in Objective 5 as
shown in COT rating
learning 5 as shown in COT 5 as shown in COT 5 as shown in COT 5 as shown in COT shown in COT
20% environments to rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter-
sheets/inter-observer
agreement forms
enhance learning observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement agreement forms
through the forms forms forms forms OR No acceptable
consistent evidence was
implementation shown.
of policies,
guidelines and
procedures.

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 4 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
2. Learning 6. Maintained SY 2021- 5% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demostrated Level Demonstrated Level 7 5
in Objective 6 as
Environment learning 2022 Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective 3 in Objective 6 as
shown in COT rating
20% environments 6 as shown in COT 6 as shown in COT 6 as shown in COT 6 as shown in COT shown in COT sheets/inter-observer
that promote rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- agreement forms
fairness, respect observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement agreement forms
and care to forms forms forms forms OR No acceptable
encourage evidence was
learning. shown.

7. Maintained SY 2021- 5,0% Quality Provided effective Provided effective Provided an Provided learning No acceptable Provided effective and
5
(SET A) and varying learning effective learning opportunity/ies varying learning
learning 2022 evidence was
opportunities that are
environments learning opportunities that opportunity that is that is/are partially shown well-aligned with the
that nurture and opportunities that are well-aligned well-aligned with aligned with the learning goals and
inspire learners are well-aligned with the learning the learning goals learning goals and feature all elements of
to participate, with the learning goals and engage and engage only somehow collaborative learning
as shown in the
cooperate and goals and feature learners to learners to engage/s learners
submitted learning
collaborate in all elements of participate, participate, to participate, material.
continued collaborative cooperate, and/or cooperate, and/or cooperate and/or
learning. learning as shown collaborate in collaborate in collaborate in
in the submitted continued continued continued
learning material. learning as shown learning as shown learning as shown
in the submitted in the submitted in the submitted
learning material. learning material. learning material.

2. Learning Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demostrated Level #N/A


0
Environment (SET B) Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective 3 in Objective 7 as
20% 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT shown in COT
rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter-
observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement agreement forms
forms forms forms forms OR No acceptable
evidence was
shown.

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 5 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
8. Applied a SY 2021- 5,0% Quality Applied effective Applied effective Applied an Applied teaching No acceptable #N/A
0
range of 2022 (SET A) teaching teaching effective teaching strategy/ies that evidence was
successful strategies that are strategies that are strategy that is well- is/are partially shown
strategies that well-aligned with well-aligned with aligned with the aligned with the
maintain learning the learning goals the learning goals learning goal/s and learning goal/s and
environments to and successfully and successfully successfully only somehow
motivate learners motivate learners motivate learners motivates learners motivate/s
to work to monitor and to work to work learners to work
productively by evaluate their own productively by productively by productively by
assuming learning as shown assuming assuming assuming
responsibility for in the submitted responsibility for responsibility for responsibility for
their own learning material. their own learning their own learning their own learning
learning. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
submitted learning submitted learning submitted learning
material. material. material.

2. Learning Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 7


5
Environment (SET B) Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective Level 3 in Objective in Objective 8 as
shown in COT rating
8 as shown in COT 8 as shown in COT 8 as shown in COT 8 as shown in COT 8 as shown in COT sheets/inter-observer
20% rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- agreement forms
observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement
forms forms forms forms forms OR No
acceptable
evidence was
shown

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 6 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
3. Diversity of 9. Designed, SY 2021- 5% Quality Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level #N/A
0
Learners, adapted and 2022 (SET A) 7 in Objective 9 as 6 in Objective 9 as 5 in Objective 9 as 4 in Objective 9 as 3 in Objective 9 as
Curriculum and implemented shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
Planning & teaching rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter-
Assessment and strategies that observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement
Reporting are responsive to forms forms forms forms forms OR No
20% learners with acceptable
disabilities, evidence was
giftednedness shown
and talents

Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 5


5
(SET B) Level 5 as shown in Level 4 as shown in Level 3 as shown in Level 2 as shown in Level 1 as shown in as shown in the TRFs
the TRFs the TRFs the TRFs the TRFs the TRFs OR No
acceptable
evidence was
shown

3. Diversity of 10. Adapted and SY 2021- 5% Quality Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level Demostrated Level #N/A
0
Learners, used culturally- 2022 (SET A) 7 in Objective 10 as 6 in Objective 10 as 5 in Objective 10 as 4 in Objective 10 as 3 in Objective 10 as
Curriculum and appropriate shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
Planning & teaching rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter- rating sheets/inter-
Assessment and strategies to observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement observer agreement
Reporting 20% address the forms forms forms forms forms OR No
needs of learners acceptable
from indigenous evidence was
groups shown

Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level 5


5
(SET B) Level 5 as shown in Level 4 as shown in Level 3 as shown in Level 2 as shown in Level 1 as shown in as shown in the TRFs
the TRFs the TRFs the TRFs the TRFs the TRFs OR No
acceptable
evidence was
shown

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 7 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
11. Adapted and SY 2021- 5% Quality Evaluated the Monitored Completed the Planned for the No acceptable Monitored progress of
4
the adapted/
implemented 2022 adapted/contextuali progress of the implementation of implementation of evidence was
contextualized learning
learning zed learning adapted/ the adapted/ the shown program while being
programs that program as contextualized contextualized adapted/contextuali implemented as
ensure relevance evidenced by MOV learning program learning program as zed existing evidence by MOV No.
and No.1 while being evidence by MOV learning program as 2

responsiveness implemented as No. 3 evidenced by MOV


to the needs of evidence by MOV No. 4
all learners No. 2
12. Utilized SY 2021- 5% Quality Implemented a Developed Planned for a Analyzed learners' No acceptable Developed materials
4
based on learners'
assessment data 2022 teaching and materials based on teaching and mastered skills evidence was
assessment data as
to inform the learning learners' learning strategy based on the shown evidenced by a list of
modification of strategy/program assessment data as and/or program frequency of errors identified least/most
teaching and using materials evidenced by a list based on learners' and correct mastered skills with
learning based on learners' of identified assessment data as responses as supporting MOV No.2

practices and assessment data as least/most mastered evidenced by a list evidenced by a list
programs evidenced by a list skills with of identified of identified
of identified supporting MOV least/most mastered least/most mastered
least/most mastered No.2 skills with skills
skills with supporting MOV
supporting MOV No.3
No. 1

4. Community 13. Maintained SY 2021- 5% Quality Collaborated with Planned with the Conducted a Communicated No acceptable Planned with the
4
the community community consultative with the community
Linkages and learning 2022 evidence was
stakeholders, a
Professional environments stakeholder in the stakeholders, a meeting with the community shown program, project,
Engagement & that are implementation/ program, project, community stakeholders and/or activity that
Personal responsive to completion of a and/or activity that stakeholders on a about a program, maintains a learning
community program/project, maintains a program, project, project, and/or environment
Growth and responsive to the
Professional contexts and/or activity that learning and/or activity that activity that
community contexts as
maintains a environment maintains a maintains a
Development evidenced y MOV No.2
learning responsive to the learning learning
30% environment community contexts environment environment
responsive to the as evidenced y responsive to the responsive to the
community contexts MOV No.2 community contexts community contexts
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
MOV No.1 MOV 3 MOV No. 4

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 8 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
4. Community 14. Reviewed SY 2021- 5% Quality Exhibited an Exhibited an Reviewed Prticipated in the No acceptable Exhibited an improved
4
Linkages and improved practice improved practice personal teaching review of personal evidence was practice through a
regularly 2022
teaching material as
Professional personal through one's through a practices using teaching practices shown impact of regularly
Engagement & teaching practice teaching as impact teaching material laws and using laws and reviewing one's
Personal Growth using existing of regularly as impact of regulations that regulations that teaching practice/s
and Professional laws and reviewing one's regularly reviewing apply to the apply to the using laws and
Development regulations that apply
regulations that teaching practice/s one's teaching profession and the profession and the
to the profession and
30% apply to the using laws and practice/s using responsibilities in responsibilities in the responsibilities in
teaching regulations that laws and the Code of Ethics the Code of Ethics the Code of Ethics for
profession and apply to the regulations that for Professional for Professional Professional Teachers
as evidenced by MOV
the profession and the apply to the Teachers in 4 Teachers in 4
No.2
responsibilities responsibilities in profession and the quarters with quarters as
specified in the the Code of Ethics responsibilities in reflection outputs evidenced by MOV
Code of Ethics for Professional the Code of Ethics as evidenced by No.4
for Professional Teachers as for Professional MOV No.3
Teachers evidenced by MOV Teachers as
No.1 evidenced by MOV
No.2

15. Complied SY 2021- 5% Quality Sustained Discussed with Communicated Implemented No acceptable Discussed with
4
engagement with learners, with learners, school policies learners,
with and 2022 evidence was
parents/guardians, and
implemented the learners, parents/guardians parents/guardians and procedures shown other stakeholders the
school policies parents/guardians , and other , and other without implemented school
and procedures and other stakeholders the stakeholders the communicating policies and
consistently to stakeholders implemented school implemented school and consulting the procedures as
evidenced by MOV
foster regarding school policies and policies and learners,
No.2
harmonious policies and procedures as procedures as parents/guardians
relationships with procedures evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV and other
learners, parents through school- No.2 No.3 stakeholders
and other community
stakeholders partnership/s as
evidenced by MOV
No.1

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 9 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
4. Community 16. Applied a SY 2021- 5% Quality Applied learner- Applied learner- Applied learner- Application of No acceptable Applied learner-
4
Linkages and centered teaching
personal 2022 centered teaching centered teaching centered teaching learner-centered evidence was
philosophy in the
Professional philosophy of philosophy in the philosophy in the philosophy in the teaching philosophy shown lesson plan in two
Engagement & teaching that is lesson plan in all lesson plan in two lesson plan in one is reflected but components of
Personal Growth learner-centered the components components of component of was poorly used instruction in the lesson
and Professional of instruction in instruction in the instruction in the as basis for plan to improve student
Development learning
the lesson plan to lesson plan to lesson plan to planning/designin
30% improve student improve student improve student g the lesson
learning learning learning

17. Adopted SY 2021- 5% Quality Exhibited dignity of Exhibited dignity of Adopted practices Adopted a No acceptable Exhibited dignity of
4
teaching as a
practices that 2022 teaching as a teaching as a that uphold the practice that evidence was
profession by exhibiting
uphold the profession by profession by dignity of teaching uphold the dignity of shown qualities such as caring
dignity of exhibiting qualities exhibiting qualities as a profession by teaching as a attitude, respect and
teaching as a such as caring such as caring exhibiting qualities profession by integrity with affirmation
profession by attitude, respect attitude, respect such as caring exhibiting qualities from any school
stakeholder as
exhibiting and integrity with and integrity with attitude, respect such as caring evidenced by one MOV
qualities such as affirmation from affirmation from and dignity as attitude, respect No.1
caring attitude, different school any school evidenced by at and dignity as
respect and stakeholders as stakeholder as least 2 MOV No.2 evidenced by one
integrity. evidenced by at evidenced by one MOV No.2
least two MOV No.1 MOV No.1

18. Set SY 2021- 5% Quality Updated Discussed Set professional Accomplished the No acceptable Discussed progress on
4
professional development professional
professional 2022 progress on e-SAT at the evidence was
development goals with
devleopment development professional goals based on e- beginning of the shown the rater during the Mid-
goals based on goals during Phase development goals SAT results as school year as year Review as
the Philippine II of the RPMS with the rater during evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
Professional Cycle as evidenced the Mid-year No.3 No.4 No.2

Standars for by MOV No.1 Review as


Teachers evidenced by MOV
No.2

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 10 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Rating
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS
OBJECTIVE (Quality)
5 4 3 2 1
5. Plus Factor 19. Performed SY 2021- 10% Quality Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 Performed at least 1 No acceptable Performed at least 1
4
related work/activity
various related 2022 related work/activity related work/activity related work/activity related work/activity evidence was
that contribute to the
works/activities that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to that contributed to shown teaching-lerning
that contribute to the teaching-lerning the teaching-lerning the teaching-lerning the teaching- process within the
the teaching- process beyond process within the process within the learning process school/Community
learning process the school/Communit learning within the class as Learning Center (CLC)
as evidenced by
school/Communit y Learning Center area/department evidenced by submitted MOV
y Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced as evidenced by submitted MOV
(CLC) as evidenced by submitted MOV submitted MOV
by submitted MOV

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Outstanding


ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

IVY MAY B. TORREON NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C. MADAMBA


Ratee Rater Approving Authority

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 11 of 56
T DURING EVALUATION

SCORE

0,250

0,250

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 12 of 56
SCORE

0,250

0,250

0,250

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 13 of 56
SCORE

0,250

0,250

0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 14 of 56
SCORE

0,000

0,250

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 15 of 56
SCORE

0,000

0,250

0,000

0,250

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 16 of 56
SCORE

0,200

0,200

0,200

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 17 of 56
SCORE

0,200

0,200

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 18 of 56
SCORE

0,200

0,200

0,200

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 19 of 56
SCORE

0,400

4,500

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 20 of 56
PART II: COMPETENCIES
Instructions: Please indicate the number of competency indicators that you demonstrated during the performance cycle.
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management

1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.


2. Undertakes personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes into account personal
goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
5
4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.

5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.

Professionalism and Ethics


1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical Standards for
Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her
actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good 4
grooming and communication.

4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.

5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve system and
help others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus

1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.

2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs
before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly
and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and
completeness with no supervision required.
5
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may
include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or improving quality, customer
satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
Note: The assessment in the demonstration of competencies shall not be reflected in the final rating. These competencies are monitored to inform professional development plans (DepEd Order No. 2, s.
ART II: COMPETENCIES
g the performance cycle.

Teamwork

1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.


2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
5
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organization goals and objectives.
Service Orientation

1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.

2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and concerns.

3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and
directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will further
enhance service delivery.
Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas, processes
and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal
productivity to create higher value and results.

3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions. 5
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.

5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to
succeed with minimal resources.

ating. These competencies are monitored to inform professional development plans (DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015, p. 9).
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: IVY MAY B. TORREON Name of Rater: NYMPHA P. DIEZ


Position: TEACHER I Position: ACADEMIC HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DIVISION OF BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: July 11, 2022
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 5% 5 5,000 0,250
Objective 2 5% 5 5,000 0,250
KRA 1 20%
Objective 3 5% 5 5,000 0,250
Objective 4 5% 5 5,000 0,250
Objective 5 5% 5 5,000 0,250
Objective 6 5% 5 5,000 0,250
KRA 2 20% FOR OBJ 7-10, Manually type in the
Objective 7 5% 4 4,000 0,200
colored cells the QUALITY ratings
Objective 8 5% 4 4,000 0,200 from the SET (A or B) used (see
Objective 9 5% 5 5,000 0,250 IPCRF-Part 1). Then unfill the cell
Objective 10 5% 5 5,000 0,250 color.
KRA 3 20%
Objective 11 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 12 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 13 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 14 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 15 5% 4 4,000 0,200
KRA 4 30%
Objective 16 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 17 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 18 5% 4 4,000 0,200
KRA 5 10% Objective 19 10% 4 4,000 0,400
Final Rating 4,400
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory

IVY MAY B. TORREON NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C. MADAMBA


Ratee Rater Approving Authority
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________

IVY MAY B. TORREON NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C. MADAMBA


RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) ENCODING SHEET
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: GLAIZA U. DURAIN Name of Rater: NYMPHA P. DIEZ


Position: TEACHER 1 Position: ACADEMIC HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: July 8, 2022
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

Weight COT/Supp COT/Supp


per COT Indicator No. Material/TRF 1 Material/TRF 2 Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives
Objectiv (Set)
Score FOR OBJ 9-10:
COT RPMS 5-pt COT RPMS 5-pt
e Rating Scale Rating Scale Q E T Ave Accomplish ONLY
Objective 1 5% 1 0 4 1 1 1,000 0,050 0 1 the white
1 cells on Pls save as using this format
Objective 2 5% 4 4 4,000 0,200 0 4 4 example:
KRA 1 20%
Objective 3 5% 2 0 4 1 1 1,000 0,050 0 1 the SET1 (A or B) Cuneta_Sharon_B_IPCR2021-2022
Objective 4 5% 3 0 4 1 1 1,000 0,050 0 1 that you
1 used.
(for auto page name/number)
Objective 5 5% 4 0 4 1 1 1,000 0,050 0 1 1
Objective 6 5% 5 0 4 1 1 1,000 0,050 0 1 Leave1the other SET
KRA 2 20%
Objective 7 5% 4 4 4,000 0,200 0 4 blank.4Delete
Objective 8 5% 4 4 4,000 0,200 0 4 4 IN PRINTING
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0
content of Column
#DIV/0! 0,5 0,8 HEADER
Objective 9 5% 6 SET A (COT) 0 0
SET B (TRF) 4 4 4,000 0,200 0 4 K (Quality
4 Rating),
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 #DIV/0! 0,6 MARGIN 0,6
7 SET A (COT) 0 0
4 Column 4 N (Ave)
KRA 3 20% Objective 10 5%
SET B (TRF) 4 4 4,000 0,200 0
Objective 11 5% 4% 0,000 0,000 and Column O 0,5
Objective 12 5% 0,000 0,000 0,8 FOOTER
Objective 13 5% 0,000 0,000 (Score) ADJUST TO 95% NORMAL SIZE
Objective 14 5% 0,000 0,000 corresponding to
Objective 15 5% 0,000 0,000
KRA 4 30%
Objective 16 5% 0,000 0,000 the Set that YOU PAPER SIZE:
Objective 17 5% 0,000 0,000 DID NOT USE. FOLIO 8.5 X 13
Objective 18 5% 0,000 0,000
KRA 5 10% Objective 19 10% 0,000 0,000 FINAL &
Final Rating #DIV/0! ADJECTIVAL
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!
RATINGS will
appear if you
GLAIZA U. DURAIN NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C, MADAMBA correctly followed
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
these instructions.
IN PRINTING sulatan og 0 ang column
0,5 0,8 HEADER K if not applicable; if ang
duha ka set ang naay
0,6 MARGIN 0,6 score e change og 0.000
ang column O therefore,
0,5
isa lang ka set kada
0,8 FOOTER
objective ang naay score
ADJUST TO 95% NORMAL SIZE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER

Name of Employee: GLAIZA U. DURAIN Name of Rater: NYMPHA P. DIEZ


Position: TEACHER 1 Position: ACADEMIC HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: July 8, 2022
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

1. Content 1. Modelled SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
Knowledge effective 2022 in Objective 1 as in Objective 1 as in Objective 1 as Objective 1 as in Objective 1 as
applications of shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
and Pedagogy
content knowledge rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
within and across sheets OR No
20% curriculum teaching acceptable
areas. evidence was
shown.
Basic Education Services

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 26 of 56
1. Content
Knowledge
and Pedagogy
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
MFO
20%
KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
Efficiency Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1
Basic Education Services

2. Evaluated with SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled and Modelled and Modelled and Modelled and evaluated
with colleagues effective
No acceptable
colleagues the 2022 evaluated with evaluated with evaluated with evidence was
colleagues effective colleagues effective colleagues effective strategy/ies that reflect/s
effectiveness of application of relevant shown
strategies that reflect strategies that reflect strategies that reflect
teaching strategies teaching practices that
adjustments or integration of well- consistent
that promote modifications in connected application of
promote critical literacy
learner and/or critical numeracy
teaching practices teaching practices relevant teaching
skills in some aspects
achievement in to enhance critical that promote critical practices that of the lesson as
literacy and literacy and/or critical literacy and/or promote critical evidenced by the
numeracy numeracy skills as critical numeracy literacy and/or submitted learning
evidenced by the skills as evidenced critical numeracy material
submitted learning by the submitted skills in all aspects
material learning material of the lesson as
evidenced by the
submitted learning
material

1. Content 3. Modelled and SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
supported colleagues 2022 in Objective 3 as in Objective 3 as in Objective 3 as Objective 3 as in Objective 3 as
Knowledge in the proficient use of shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
and Pedagogy Mother Tongue,
rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
Filipino and English to
sheets OR No
improve teaching and
20% learning, as well as to acceptable
develop learners’ evidence was
pride of their shown.
language, heritage
and culture.

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 27 of 56
Knowledge
and Pedagogy
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
20% Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

4. Displayed a wide SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
range of effective 2022 in Objective 4 as in Objective 4 as in Objective 4 as Objective 4 as in Objective 4 as
verbal and non-verbal shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
classroom
rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
communicatio n
sheets OR No
strategies to support
learner acceptable
understanding, evidence was
participation, shown.
engagement and
achievement

2. Learning 5. Exhibited SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
Environment effective strategies 2022 in Objective 5 as in Objective 5 as in Objective 5 as Objective 5 as in Objective 5 as
that ensure safe shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
and secure learning rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
20% environments to sheets OR No
enhance learning acceptable
through the evidence was
consistent shown.
implementation of
policies, guidelines
and procedures

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 28 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

2. Learning 6. Exhibited SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
Environment effective practices 2022 in Objective 6 as in Objective 6 as in Objective 6 as Objective 6 as in Objective 6 as
to foster learning shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
environments that rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
20% promote fairness, sheets OR No
respect and care to acceptable
encourage learning evidence was
shown.

7. Worked with SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled varying Modelled varying Modelled effective Modelled an No acceptable
colleagues to share 2022 strategies that strategies that strategies that effective strategy evidence was
successful sustain a sustain a promote a that promote a shown
strategies that supportive learning supporting supportive supportive learning
sustain supportive environment for learning learning environment and
learning learners to environment and environment and engage learners to
environments that recognize each feature all engage learners participate,
nurture and inspire other’s learning elements of to participate, cooperate, and/or
learners to strengths and collaborative cooperate, and/or collaborate in
participate, value the learning as shown collaborate in class discussions
cooperate and contribution of in the submitted continued as shown in the
collaborate in others as learning material learning as shown submitted learning
continued learning evidenced by the in the submitted materials
submitted learning learning materials
material

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 29 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

2. Learning 8. Modelled SY 2021- 5% QET Modelled and Modelled and Modelled and Modelled and No acceptable
Environment successful 2022 discussed with discussed with discussed with discussed with evidence was
strategies and colleagues colleagues colleagues varied colleagues a shown
supported effective consistent teaching teaching practice
20% colleagues in strategies that application of practices that that successfully
promoting learning reflect teaching successfully motivate learners
environments that modifications in practices that motivate learners to work
effectively motivate teaching successfully to work productively by
learners to work practices to motivate learners productively by assuming
productively by sustain learner to monitor and assuming responsibility for
assuming motivation in evaluate their responsibility for their own learning
responsibility for monitoring and own learning as their own learning as shown in the
their own learning evaluating their shown in the as shown in the submitted learning
own learning as submitted learning submitted learning material
shown in the material material
submitted learning
material

3. Diversity of 9. Assisted SY 2021- 5,0% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
Learners, colleagues to 2022 (SET A) in Objective 9 as in Objective 9 as in Objective 9 as Objective 9 as in Objective 9 as
design, adapt and shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
Curriculum
implement teaching rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
and Planning strategies that are sheets OR No
& Assessment responsive to acceptable
and Reporting learners with evidence was
disabilities, shown.
20% giftedness and
talents

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 30 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

3. Diversity of QET Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated


Learners, (SET B) Level 5 as shown Level 4 as shown Level 3 as shown 2 as shown in the Level 1 as shown
in the TRFs in the TRFs in the TRFs TRFs in the TRFs OR
Curriculum
No acceptable
and Planning evidence was
& Assessment shown
and Reporting

20%
10. Developed and SY 2021- 5,0% QET Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6 Modelled Level 5 in Modelled Level 4
applied teaching 2022 (SET A) in Objective 10 as in Objective 10 as in Objective 10 as Objective 10 as in Objective 10 as
strategies to shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the COT shown in the
address effectively rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets COT rating
the needs of sheets OR No
learners from acceptable
indigenous groups evidence was
shown.

QET Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Level Demonstrated


(SET B) Level 5 as shown Level 4 as shown Level 3 as shown 2 as shown in the Level 1 as shown
in the TRFs in the TRFs in the TRFs TRFs in the TRFs OR
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 31 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

3. Diversity of 11. Worked SY 2021- 5% QET Worked with Worked with Worked with Evaluated the No acceptable
Learners, collaboratively with 2022 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in design of learning evidence was
colleagues to redesigning listing detailed evaluating the programs that shown
Curriculum learning recommendation design of develop the
evaluate the design
and Planning of learning programs based s on improving learning knowledge and skills
& Assessment programs that on the list of the design of programs that of learners at
and Reporting develop the recommendations learning develop the different ability
knowledge and as evidenced by programs based knowledge and levels without the
skills of learners at MOV No. 1 on the results of skills of learners at help of colleagues
20%
different ability evaluation as different ability as evidenced by
levels evidenced by levels as MOV No. 4
MOV No. 2 evidenced by
MOV No. 3

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 32 of 56
and Reporting

20% PERFORMANCE INDICATORS


Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

12. Worked SY 2021- 5% QET Evaluated Implemented Explored Planned activities No acceptable
collaboratively with 2022 activities with activities with interventions with with colleagues to evidence was
colleagues to colleagues by colleagues to colleagues to address the use of shown
analyze and utilize looking for key address the use of address utilization assessment data to
assessment data to success indicators assessment data of assessment modify practices
modify practices (p. 14, DO 35, s. to modify practices data which could and/or programs as
and programs to 2016) as evidenced and/or programs be in the form of evidenced by the
further support by the submitted as evidenced by learning materials, submitted MOV
learner progress MOV the submitted instructional
and achievement MOV materials,
equipment,
strategies in
teaching, modality
in teaching,
program, etc. (p.
9, DO 35, s. 2016)
as evidenced by
the submitted
MOV

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 33 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

4. Community 13. Reflected on SY 2021- 5% QET Synthesized the Consulted Conducted FGD Conducted a No acceptable
Linkages and and evaluated 2022 evaluations from parents, with teachers on survey to gather evidence was
learning the wider school guardians, and/or programs, feedback on shown
Professional other external
environments that community of the projects, and/or programs, projects,
Engagement are responsive to programs, projects, stakeholders on activities that and/or activities that
& Personal community contexts and/or activities programs, maintain the are responsive to
Growth and that maintain the projects, and/or learning community contexts
Professional learning activities that environments as evidenced by
environment maintain the responsive to MOV No. 4
Dev't
responsive to learning community context
community context environments to reflect on and
30% as evidenced by responsive to evaluate them as
MOV No. 1 community context evidenced by
to reflect on and MOV No. 3
evaluate them as
evidenced by
MOV No. 2

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 34 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

4. Community 14. Discussed with SY 2021- 5% QET Discussed with Discussed with Discussed with Planned for a No acceptable
Linkages and colleagues teaching 2022 colleagues colleagues colleagues discussion of evidence was
and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
Professional learning practices learning practices learning practices
practices that apply learning practices
Engagement existing codes, laws that adhere to laws, that adhere to that adhere to that adhere to laws,
& Personal and regulations that regulations, and laws, regulations, laws, regulations, regulations, and
Growth and apply to the responsibilities and and responsibilities
Professional teaching specified in the responsibilities responsibilities specified in the
profession, and the Code of Ethics for specified in the specified in the Code of Ethics for
Dev't
responsibilities Professional Code of Ethics for Code of Ethics for Professional
specified in the Teachers and Professional Professional Teachers as
30% Code of Ethics for reviewed the Teachers and Teachers as evidenced by MOV
Professional annotated reviewed the evidenced by No. 4
Teachers evidence of personal MOV No. 3
practice of reflection notes
colleagues as of colleagues as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by
No. 1 MOV No. 2

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 35 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

15. Exhibited SY 2021- 5% QET Evaluated with Conducted Discussed with Implemented No acceptable
commitment to and 2022 teachers the discussions with teachers certain school policies and evidence was
supported teachers implementation of teachers on the school policies procedures as shown
in the certain school progress of and procedures evidenced by MOV
implementation of policies and implementation for uniform No. 4
school policies and procedures as of certain school implementation
procedures to foster evidenced by MOV policies and as evidenced by
harmonious No. 1 procedures as MOV No. 3
relationships with evidenced by
learners, parents MOV No. 2
and other
stakeholders

4. Community 16. Manifested a SY 2021- 5% QET Evaluated Implemented Planned for an Demonstrated a No acceptable
Linkages and learner- centered 2022 lesson plans of plan for an activity activity to support learner-centered evidence was
teaching philosophy colleagues to to support colleagues in teaching philosophy shown
Professional
in various aspects enhance their own colleagues in enhancing their in one aspect of
Engagement of practice and learner- centered enhancing their own learner- practice (i.e., lesson
& Personal support colleagues teaching practice own learner- centered teaching planning) as
Growth and in enhancing their as evidenced by centered teaching practice as evidenced by MOV
Professional own learner- MOV No. 1 practice as evidenced by No. 4
Dev't centered teaching evidenced by MOV No. 3
philosophy MOV No. 2

30%

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 36 of 56
& Personal
Growth and
Professional PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Dev't Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness
30%
5 4 3 2 1

17. Identified and SY 2021- 5% QET Identified and Identified and Identified and Identified personal No acceptable
utilized personal 2022 utilized personal utilized personal utilized personal professional evidence was
professional professional professional professional strengths that shown
strengths to uphold strengths to uphold strengths to strengths to uphold the dignity of
the dignity of the dignity of uphold the dignity uphold the dignity teaching as a
teaching as a teaching as a of teaching as a of teaching as a profession as
profession to help profession to help profession to help profession to help evidenced by MOV
build a positive build a positive build a positive build a positive No. 4
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning culture learning culture learning culture learning culture
within the school w/in the sch. by w/in the sch. by within the school
inspiring unity in initiating in responding to
responding 2 activities to avoid an issue or a
potential threats potential threats challenging
and risks to the & risks to the situation as
school school evidenced by
community as community as MOV No. 3
evidenced by MOV evidenced by
No. 1 MOV No. 2

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 37 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

18. Reflected on SY 2021- 5% QET Updated Conducted Planned for Accomplished the No acceptable
the Philippine 2022 professional mid-year review professional e-SAT at the evidence was
Professional development with colleagues as development beginning of the shown
Standards for goals during evidenced by based on e- SAT school year as
Teachers to plan Phase II of the MOV No. 2 or 3 results as evidenced by MOV
personal RPMS Cycle as evidenced by No.5
professional evidenced by MOV MOV No. 4
development goals No.1
and assist
colleagues in
planning and
achieving their own
goals

5. Plus Factor 19. Performed SY 2021- 10% QET Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least 1 No acceptable
various related 2022 1 related 1 related 1 related related work/activity evidence was
works/activities that work/activity that work/activity that work/activity that that contributed to shown
contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the the teaching-
teaching-learning teaching-lerning teaching-lerning teaching-lerning learning process
process process beyond process within process within within the class as
the the the learning evidenced by
school/Communit school/Communi area/department submitted MOV
y Learning Center ty Learning as evidenced by
(CLC) as Center (CLC) as submitted MOV
evidenced by evidenced by
submitted MOV submitted MOV

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 38 of 56
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
WEIGHT PER Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Efficiency
OBJECTIVE
Timeliness

5 4 3 2 1

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

GLAIZA U. DURAIN NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C, MADAMBA


Ratee Rater Approving Authority

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 39 of 56
TER TEACHERS I-IV

A P. DIEZ
MIC HEAD
022

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

Modelled Level 4 in 1 0,050


Objective 1 as shown in
the COT rating sheets OR
No acceptable evidence
was shown.

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 40 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

Modelled and evaluated


4 0,200
with colleagues effective
strategies that reflect
integration of well-
connected teaching
practices that promote
critical literacy and/or
critical numeracy skills as
evidenced by the
submitted learning
material

Modelled Level 4 in 1 0,050


Objective 3 as shown in
the COT rating sheets OR
No acceptable evidence
was shown.

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 41 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

Modelled Level 4 in
1 0,050
Objective 4 as shown in
the COT rating sheets OR
No acceptable evidence
was shown.

Modelled Level 4 in 1 0,050


Objective 5 as shown in
the COT rating sheets OR
No acceptable evidence
was shown.

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 42 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

Modelled Level 4 in
1 0,050
Objective 6 as shown in
the COT rating sheets OR
No acceptable evidence
was shown.

Modelled varying 4 0,200


strategies that sustain a
supporting learning
environment and feature
all elements of
collaborative learning as
shown in the submitted
learning material

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 43 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

Modelled and discussed


4 0,200
with colleagues
consistent application of
teaching practices that
successfully motivate
learners to monitor and
evaluate their own
learning as shown in the
submitted learning
material

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 44 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

Demonstrated Level 4 as
4 0,200
shown in the TRFs

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Demonstrated Level 4 as
4 0,200
shown in the TRFs

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 45 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 46 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 47 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 48 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 49 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

#N/A 0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 50 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 51 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#N/A
0 0,000

#N/A
0 0,000

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 52 of 56
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality) SCORE

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

ORAH C, MADAMBA
proving Authority

de47d162fc4445b72fa17e379bfe37cf 53 of 56
PART II: COMPETENCIES
Instructions: Please indicate the number of competency indicators that you demonstrated during the performance cycle.
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development. 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Undertakes personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes into account 2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.

4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. 4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
organization goals and objectives.
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation
1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical Standards for
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and concerns.
actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good
3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
grooming and communication.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
and directions.
5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve system and 5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will further
help others improve their effectiveness. enhance service delivery.
Results Focus Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas, processes
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs 2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal
before personal needs. productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly
and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
completeness with no supervision required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on 4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. organization.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or improving quality,
to succeed with minimal resources.
customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
Note: The assessment in the demonstration of competencies shall not be reflected in the final rating. These competencies are monitored to inform professional development plans (DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015, p. 9).
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: GLAIZA U. DURAIN Name of Rater: NYMPHA P. DIEZ


Position: TEACHER 1 Position: ACADEMIC HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BUTUAN CITY Date of Review: July 8, 2022
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 5% 1 1,000 0,050
Objective 2 5% 4 4,000 0,200
KRA 1 20%
Objective 3 5% 1 1,000 0,050
Objective 4 5% 1 1,000 0,050
Objective 5 5% 1 1,000 0,050
Objective 6 5% 1 1,000 0,050
KRA 2 20%
Objective 7 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 8 5% 4 4,000 0,200
Objective 9 5% 0,000 0,000 FOR OBJ 9-10, Manually type in the colored cells the QUALITY ratings from
Objective 10 5% 0,000 0,000 the SET (A or B) used (see IPCRF-Part 1). Then unfill the cell color.
KRA 3 20%
Objective 11 5% 0 0,000 0,000
Objective 12 5% 0 0,000 0,000
Objective 13 5% 0 0,000 0,000
Objective 14 5% 0 0,000 0,000
Objective 15 5% 0 0,000 0,000
KRA 4 30%
Objective 16 5% 0 0,000 0,000
Objective 17 5% 0 0,000 0,000
Objective 18 5% 0 0,000 0,000
KRA 5 10% Objective 19 10% 0 0,000 0,000
Final Rating 0,850
Adjectival Rating Poor

GLAIZA U. DURAIN NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C, MADAMBA


Ratee Rater Approving Authority
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________

GLAIZA U. DURAIN NYMPHA P. DIEZ DEBORAH C, MADAMBA


RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

You might also like