Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

PAPER NAME AUTHOR

18061- IX Semester (Project Report).doc Kartikey Varshney

x

WORD COUNT CHARACTER COUNT

8984 Words 46316 Characters

PAGE COUNT FILE SIZE

24 Pages 161.1KB

SUBMISSION DATE REPORT DATE

Nov 16, 2022 7:26 PM GMT+5:30 Nov 16, 2022 7:28 PM GMT+5:30

19% Overall Similarity

The combined total of all matches, including overlapping sources, for each database.
17% Internet database 6% Publications database
Crossref database Crossref Posted Content database
13% Submitted Works database

Excluded from Similarity Report

Bibliographic material Quoted material
Cited material Small Matches (Less then 10 words)
Manually excluded text blocks

Summary
despite the sellers can do sell their products/services ontheir own websites. This point to the fact
the due to its wide range access, these platforms have become a necessity, with wider
geographical range.

VII. CONCLUSION

One can see that the applicability of the Essential Facilities Doctrine in the Digital Economy
has been through a roller coaster ride as the essence of the doctrine has not been able to cope
up with the ever-changing dynamics of the digital world. As we have seen the latest application
76
of the Essential Facilities Doctrine has been in the infrastructure sector and not even in the
digital space. The answer to the question is yet under scrutiny as the importance has not been
felt. The already existing Competition abuses, like refusal to deal or denial of access, have
been sufficient to garb under them the possibilities o f s u c h n a t u r e .

The confusion which has stemmed into this arena is not fading away, it seems. The reluctance
is real. The problem lies in the rudimentary definition of Essential Facility which has been
provided. One cannot get away from the fact that the reliance has mostly been shied away
because of established tests which played greater emphasis on the physical infrastructure in the
past. The next problem which seems to arise in this setting is that the biggest hindrance in
applying this doctrine in the digital platform setup will hinder innovation. As was put
down in the Epic Games case, where Apple took the plea that if non-discriminatory access is
allowed to competitors, such practices in the idea to garner competition will hamper
competition, in the long run. As the motive behind the competition, is to foster competition in
all strata then to remove competition at all. This doctrine has been criticized by various
reviewers and authors of being rudimentary to the competition approach. That is the reason
while essential facility-like remedies are the go-to remedies for Competition watchdogs across
the globe by stretching the concepts of refusal to supply and denial of access and under
theories of harm. It is although not a problem to envisage the doctrine under the Digital
Economy if requisite definition for essential facility is provided.

24
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

19% Overall Similarity

Top sources found in the following databases:
17% Internet database 6% Publications database
Crossref database Crossref Posted Content database
13% Submitted Works database

TOP SOURCES
The sources with the highest number of matches within the submission. Overlapping sources will not be
displayed.

diva-portal.org
1 2%
Internet

regmedia.co.uk
2 <1%
Internet

mondaq.com
3 <1%
Internet

University of Birmingham on 2021-05-23

4 <1%
Submitted works

National Law University New Delhi on 2017-11-10

5 <1%
Submitted works

hausfeld.com
6 <1%
Internet

pure.uvt.nl
7 <1%
Internet

www-cdn.law.stanford.edu
8 <1%
Internet

Sources overview
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

University of Lancaster on 2020-12-14

9 <1%
Submitted works

laweconcenter.org
10 <1%
Internet

works.bepress.com
11 <1%
Internet

mafiadoc.com
12 <1%
Internet

one.oecd.org
13 <1%
Internet

techcrunch.com
14 <1%
Internet

gwlr.org
15 <1%
Internet

researchgate.net
16 <1%
Internet

Turun yliopisto on 2021-05-28

17 <1%
Submitted works

University of Warwick on 2019-09-04

18 <1%
Submitted works

City University on 2019-09-04

19 <1%
Submitted works

004319f.netsolhost.com
20 <1%
Internet

Sources overview
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University on 2020-12-12

21 <1%
Submitted works

Universiteit van Amsterdam on 2020-07-21

22 <1%
Submitted works

casemine.com
23 <1%
Internet

UC, Irvine on 2022-05-26

24 <1%
Submitted works

University of Maine on 2021-12-06

25 <1%
Submitted works

yetkin.com.tr
26 <1%
Internet

Macquarie University on 2020-05-16

27 <1%
Submitted works

City University on 2020-09-08

28 <1%
Submitted works

apps.americanbar.org
29 <1%
Internet

mededingingscongres.nl
30 <1%
Internet

O. P. Jindal Global University on 2021-12-04

31 <1%
Submitted works

York St John University on 2020-01-09

32 <1%
Submitted works

Sources overview
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

f.datasrvr.com
33 <1%
Internet

University of Sheffield on 2021-08-26

34 <1%
Submitted works

cand.uscourts.gov
35 <1%
Internet

ejls.eui.eu
36 <1%
Internet

lawecommons.luc.edu
37 <1%
Internet

Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University on 2021-06-15

38 <1%
Submitted works

Trinity College Dublin on 2020-07-24

39 <1%
Submitted works

University of Nottingham on 2011-05-06

40 <1%
Submitted works

boris.unibe.ch
41 <1%
Internet

kti.krtk.hu
42 <1%
Internet

Gujarat National Law University on 2014-06-13

43 <1%
Submitted works

La Trobe University on 2022-09-14

44 <1%
Submitted works

Sources overview
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

Trinity College Dublin on 2021-01-22

45 <1%
Submitted works

utrechtjournal.org
46 <1%
Internet

springerprofessional.de
47 <1%
Internet

Alina Wernick. "Mechanisms to Enable Follow-On Innovation", Springer ...

48 <1%
Crossref

Erasmus University of Rotterdam on 2019-08-15

49 <1%
Submitted works

University of Petroleum and Energy Studies on 2016-04-10

50 <1%
Submitted works

lawaudience.com
51 <1%
Internet

Turun yliopisto on 2017-11-02

52 <1%
Submitted works

University College London on 2021-04-12

53 <1%
Submitted works

University of Essex on 2008-05-28

54 <1%
Submitted works

business-standard.com
55 <1%
Internet

commerce.senate.gov
56 <1%
Internet

Sources overview
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

Andrea Renda. "Competition–regulation interface in telecommunication...

57 <1%
Crossref

Asia Pacific Instutute of Information Technology on 2022-03-06

58 <1%
Submitted works

Christ University on 2015-03-13

59 <1%
Submitted works

University of Glasgow on 2020-09-07

60 <1%
Submitted works

Vrije Universiteit Brussel on 2017-05-15

61 <1%
Submitted works

rsrr.in
62 <1%
Internet

ukessays.com
63 <1%
Internet

ussc.edu.au
64 <1%
Internet

Charles University on 2021-08-26

65 <1%
Submitted works

Christ University on 2015-03-13

66 <1%
Submitted works

Hatzopoulos, Vassilis. "The EU essential facilities doctrine. Research P...

67 <1%
Publication

The WB National University of Juridical Sciences on 2019-07-10

68 <1%
Submitted works

Sources overview
 Similarity Report ID: oid:28078:27038004

Trinity College Dublin on 2020-07-24

69 <1%
Submitted works

University of Lancaster on 2020-12-13

70 <1%
Submitted works

University of Macau on 2021-04-13

71 <1%
Submitted works

University of Warwick on 2021-04-18

72 <1%
Submitted works

University of Witwatersrand on 2014-10-31

73 <1%
Submitted works

depotuw.ceon.pl
74 <1%
Internet

dev.competitionpolicyinternational.com
75 <1%
Internet

link.springer.com
76 <1%
Internet

Sources overview