Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philosophical Psychological Ethical Foundations of Education Assessment of Learning Classroom Management
Philosophical Psychological Ethical Foundations of Education Assessment of Learning Classroom Management
Philosophical Psychological Ethical Foundations of Education Assessment of Learning Classroom Management
1. Behaviorism
stimulus-response 2. Cognitivism
John Watson (father of behaviorism) thought-processing
a. Ivan Pavlov Jean Piaget (father of cognitivism)
Classical/Respondent Conditioning
Automatic response (hi, hello) Stages of Development
Experiment: Dog & Bell a. Sensorimotor (0-2 y/o)
Senses and movement
b. B.F Skinner Sucking reflex
Operant Conditioning Object Permanence – belief that
Reinforcement and Punishment something exists even w/o seeing it
Reinforcement: increases response Object permanence is present at 6Th
Punishment: weakens the response month (peek a boo)
Experiment: Rat & Maze
b. Pre-operational (2-6 y/o)
c. Albert Bandura Before it operates
Social Learning Theory (gaya-gaya) Egocentrism – limited to his own
OMI (Observation, Modeling, POV
Imitation) Centration – focused on one aspect
Experiment: Bobo doll of things only
Inactive Teachers
At least 5 years of no practice
Refresher course (DepEd)
Ethical Foundations of Education II
Level II – Conventional
Stage 3: Good boy-Nice Girl
Orientation
Social acceptance
Stage 4: Law and Order
Peace and order
Assessment of Learning
Based on standards; criteria; specific
Assessment FOR Learning (teacher) target; objectives
Before and during instruction Norm-referenced testing
FOR the students learning (para sa Based on performance of others;
kaalaman) classmates; batch mates
Can still help students
Assessment/instruction is not yet done Difficulty Index
Enhance/improve students Easiness of the test/question
Diagnostic Test: testing students 0-0.20: Very Difficult; reject
strengths/weaknesses 0.21-0.40: Difficult: revise
Formative Test: teacher is conducting 0.41-0.60: Moderate; retain
a quiz while teaching 0.61-0.80: Easy; revise
0.81-1.00: Very Easy; reject
Assessment OF learning (teacher) Discrimination Index
After instruction Differentiates upper group from lower
Cannot help students anymore group
Assessment/instruction is already Positive Discrimination Index (+) –
done More from upper group
Midterms/Finals Negative Discrimination Index (-) –
LET examination More from lower group
Zero Discrimination Index – cannot
Assessment AS Learning (student) discriminate; useless
Self-evaluation; Self-awareness
Metacognition – thinking about your Traditional Assessment
thinking; assessing your own answer pen and paper test
focus is cognitive aspect of learning
Validity only
The instrument measures what it 3 Domains of Learning
intends/supposed to measure o Cognitive
Reliability o Psychomotor
Consistency o Affective
“reliable” source Authentic Assessment
Note: Not all reliable tests are valid tests, Real-life situation; holistic
but valid tests are always reliable