The document discusses international trade theory and concepts such as comparative advantage, economic nationalism, and their implications for less developed countries. It provides examples to illustrate the theory of comparative advantage showing how two countries or individuals can both benefit from trade even if one party is more productive. It also notes that while classical trade theory suggests all countries benefit, in practice less developed countries have not always seen gains and may need protectionist policies early in their development. Finally, it states that economic nationalism, which aims to control a nation's economy, is incompatible with free trade and globalization as it promotes limiting imports and exports for nationalistic reasons.
The document discusses international trade theory and concepts such as comparative advantage, economic nationalism, and their implications for less developed countries. It provides examples to illustrate the theory of comparative advantage showing how two countries or individuals can both benefit from trade even if one party is more productive. It also notes that while classical trade theory suggests all countries benefit, in practice less developed countries have not always seen gains and may need protectionist policies early in their development. Finally, it states that economic nationalism, which aims to control a nation's economy, is incompatible with free trade and globalization as it promotes limiting imports and exports for nationalistic reasons.
The document discusses international trade theory and concepts such as comparative advantage, economic nationalism, and their implications for less developed countries. It provides examples to illustrate the theory of comparative advantage showing how two countries or individuals can both benefit from trade even if one party is more productive. It also notes that while classical trade theory suggests all countries benefit, in practice less developed countries have not always seen gains and may need protectionist policies early in their development. Finally, it states that economic nationalism, which aims to control a nation's economy, is incompatible with free trade and globalization as it promotes limiting imports and exports for nationalistic reasons.
CHAN, ZARINA B. BSBA-3 NOVEMBER 17, 2022 ACTIVITY #6
1. What do you mean by classical theory of comparative
advantage? When used to describe international trade, comparative advantage refers to the products that a country can produce more cheaply or easily than other countries.
2. Explain your example of the theory of comparative advantage.
Give an example where two countries are both not benefited. As an example, consider a famous athlete like Michael Jordan. As a renowned basketball and baseball star, Michael Jordan is an exceptional athlete whose physical abilities surpass those of most other individuals. Michael Jordan would likely be able to, say, paint his house quickly, owing to his abilities as well as his impressive height.
Hypothetically, say that Michael Jordan could paint his
house in eight hours. In those same eight hours, though, he could also take part in the filming of a television commercial which would earn him $50,000. By contrast, Jordan's neighbor Joe could paint the house in 10 hours. In that same period of time, he could work at a fast food restaurant and earn $100.
In this example, Joe has a comparative advantage, even
though Michael Jordan could paint the house faster and better. The best trade would be for Michael Jordan to film a television commercial and pay Joe to paint his house. So long as Michael Jordan makes the expected $50,000 and Joe earns more than $100, the trade is a winner. Owing to their diversity of skills, Michael Jordan and Joe would likely find this to be the best arrangement for their mutual benefit.
It is not possible for a country to have a comparative
advantage in all goods.
3. Is free international trade favorable to the less developed
countries? Explain. The classical trade theory states that the gains from international trade accrue to the nationals of trading countries. In case of most of the less developed countries, this has not materialised. It is obvious that the classical principle of comparative cost advantage has little relevance to the conditions of less developed countries. It is important for these countries, at least in the early stage of their development, to pursue protectionist policies to develop and diversify the industries rather than to allow the unrestricted flow of cheap products to flood their markets and disorganise completely their whole structure of production.
4. What is economic nationalism?
The definition of economic nationalism states that it is a means to control the nation’s economy. Advocates of this concept are completely antagonistic towards globalization. The general belief is that globalization promotes excess international trade and investment policies, thus leading to diminished nationalism.
5. Is economic nationalism compatible with international trade?
Why? No, because mercantilism or economic nationalism, in spirit and practice, is the exact opposite to free trade. Indeed, mercantilism conveys that a country must accumulate wealth by limiting imports and increasing exports. In addition, mercantilism implies the colonialization of other countries so that raw materials are obtained cheaply, and manufactured items are exported to colonies at high prices. Mercantilists, indeed, had a dark view of international trade and were driven by raw nationalism.