Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS Koch
ANALYSIS Koch
mistakes to enable them rectify. However, when they are sentenced to death penalty, they are
denied a chance to ever correct their mistakes or ever realize where they did wrong. According to
Death and justice from the famous U.S politician who house for representatives for the New
York City Edward Koch, capital punishments are morally wrong (Koch pg. 489). Koch argues
that death penalty is never used in democratic countries and therefore America should restrain
from death penalties as a means of punishment for lawbreakers. In addition, several innocent
people who are executed by mistakes and this take away their precious life as a mistake.
Koch approach is that death penalty is barbaric, any form of death inflicted penalty is
designed to be painful and a horrible experience for the criminal. Initially, death penalty used
cruel means like hanging, electrocution and suffocation. However, the change introduced uses
lethal indication and it is the most used form of death penalty. This is an attempt to make death
more human to uphold the value of human life. Death is death no matter the way it is brought by,
the best option can be granting criminals a chance to rectify their mistakes (Koch, pg. 483).
From a Rogerian approach, death penalty should never be used as a way of punishing
criminals. This is because the method provides no chance for the criminals to rectify their
mistakes neither does it improve the situation. It is true that life is precious on both sides and the
criminal who has taken the life of an innocent ought to repay with her own life. However, ending
life for another neither does it provide nor solution. The best alternative is allowing the criminal
an individual. Despite that it is perceived to be the best interest of justice, capital punishments
are de humanizing irrespective of the nature of the crime committed. This is explained by the
high number of death row convicts who appeal for their sentences. Koch compares death penalty
to the state sanctioned murder. It can be perceived as the misuse of the powers given to the state
by its citizens and abuses of the rights of individuals especially considering innocent ones
In an overall perspective, the state should consider other alternatives like life in prison to
punish capital crime offenders. This gives their life more value while allowing them time to
changes and integrate back with the society. By giving these criminals a chance to change and
leave with regret of their actions. In this way, justice can be served to both the victim and the
offender. In addition, there is no proven statistics that death penalty results in reduction in crime
rates. Eliminating the death penalty in the society, will give the value of individual the right to
live irrespective of the crimes, which he/she will be given a chance can correct and integrate
Work cited: