Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11-Ejemplo de Estabilidad de Presas de Tierra F y B

    Uploaded by

    Williams Gomez Garcia
    8 views7 pages
    This document presents two methods for calculating the factor of safety for a retaining wall: the Fellenius method and the Bishop method. Six trials are shown with calculations for each method. The Fellenius method results in a factor of safety of 2.04. The Bishop method calculates individual stability numbers and their product, resulting in a factor of safety of 2.218. The difference between the two methods is 0.718.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    11-Ejemplo de Estabilidad de Presas de Tierra f y b (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document presents two methods for calculating the factor of safety for a retaining wall: the Fellenius method and the Bishop method. Six trials are shown with calculations for each method. The Fellenius method results in a factor of safety of 2.04. The Bishop method calculates individual stability numbers and their product, resulting in a factor of safety of 2.218. The difference between the two methods is 0.718.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    8 views7 pages

    11-Ejemplo de Estabilidad de Presas de Tierra F y B

    Uploaded by

    Williams Gomez Garcia
    This document presents two methods for calculating the factor of safety for a retaining wall: the Fellenius method and the Bishop method. Six trials are shown with calculations for each method. The Fellenius method results in a factor of safety of 2.04. The Bishop method calculates individual stability numbers and their product, resulting in a factor of safety of 2.218. The difference between the two methods is 0.718.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    METODO DE FELLENIUS

    DATOS :
    b
    Gamma =
    PHI´ =
    20 KN/m3
    32 ° L=b sec α = cos α
    c´ = 20 KN/m2
    ru = 0.4

    Reb b (m) h (m) alpha(°) l=L (m) W (KN) Wsen(a)


    1 2 1.30 -14 2.061 52.000 -12.580
    2 2 2.50 -4 2.005 100.000 -6.976
    3 2 3.60 8 2.020 144.000 20.041
    4 2 4.60 18 2.103 184.000 56.859
    5 2 4.40 36 2.472 176.000 103.450
    6 2 2.20 58 3.774 88.000 74.628
    14.435 235.423

    c ´ . La +tan φ ´ . Σ (W cosα−ul)
    FS=
    Σ Wsen α
    FS= 2.04
    Esf min

    Esf min
    b
    cos α W =γ bh
    Wcos(a) u (KN/m2) Wcos(a)-u*l
    50.455 10.40 29.019
    99.756 20.00 59.659
    142.599 28.80 84.433
    174.994 36.80 97.607
    142.387 35.20 55.368
    46.633 17.60 -19.792
    306.292

    u u ruW
    ru= = =U =
    γh W /b b
    Esf max

    Esf max
    METODO DE BISHOP
    DATOS:
    Gamma = 20 KN/m3
    PHI´ = 32 °
    c´ = 20 KN/m2
    ru = 0.4
    FS(asum) = 1.500

    Reb b (m) h (m) alpha(°) W (KN) Wsen(a) (I) (II)


    1 2 1.30 -14 52 -12.580 59.496 1.150
    2 2 2.50 -4 100 -6.976 77.492 1.033
    3 2 3.60 8 144 20.041 93.989 0.954
    4 2 4.60 18 184 56.859 108.986 0.926
    5 2 4.40 36 176 103.450 105.986 0.949
    6 2 2.20 58 88 74.628 72.993 1.132
    235.423

    { }
    1 sec α
    FS= Σ [ c' b+W (1−r u )tan φ ' ]
    Σ Wsenα tan α tan φ '
    1+
    FS
    (I) (II)
    FS = 2.218
    DIFER = 0.718
    (I) * (II)
    68.424
    80.012
    89.663
    100.933
    100.568
    82.646
    522.246

    You might also like