OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
BASIC KRA 1: ● Performed instructional MOVs
EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL monitoring to teachers to -Instructional Monitoring Plan
SERVICES LEADERSHIP increase their competence - Instructional Monitoring Report with
in the delivery of distance Analysis
(35%) learning modalities with a - SLMs Monitoring Report
monthly target of at least - LDM summary feedback report
10 teachers. - LDM analysis Report

September All indicators are evident monitored at least 10 teachers per

5 month
2021 ro 15%
June 2022 3 indicators are evident monitored at least 8 of the teachers
4 per month
2 indicators are evident monitored at least 6 teachers per
3 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
month
1 indicators are evident monitored at least 4 teachers per
2
month
no indicator is evident monitored at least 2 of the teachers
1 per month
● Provided Technical MOVs:
Assistance to teachers in -Accomplished LDM Feedback
the implementation of Report
Distance Learning Modality -Approved TA Plan LDM
(LDM) -Approved TA Plan SLM
-TA Report for LDM
-TA Report for SLM

All indicators were evident Submitted report on the due

September 5 date
2021 ro 15% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 Submitted report 3 days after
4 4 indicators were evident
due date

Submitted report 6 days after

3 3 indicators were evident
due date
Submitted report on the 7th day
2 2 indicators were evident
onward after the due date
Submitted report on the 8th day
1 1 indicators were evident
onward after the due date
● conducted Research on MOVs:
Curriculum and instruction -Approved Research Proposal
-SDS approved the conduct of the
study
-Certificate of Completion
- Evidence of implementation

Completed resesearches (3- 90-100% completed research were Completed within 5.5 months
5 Big,2Medium and 1 Small) implemented

September
2021 ro 5% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: ● conducted Research on Date of Review:
Curriculum and instruction
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Completed resesearches (2-Big,1 80-89% completed research were Completed within 5.7 months.
September
2021 ro 5% 4 Medium and 2 approved proposals) implemented 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
Completed resesearches (1-Big,1 70-79% completed research were Completed within 6 months.
3 Medium and 1 approved proposal implemented
Small)
Approved research proposal (3-big, 60-69% completed research were Completed within 7-8 months.
2 2 medium, 1 approved proposal implemented

Approved research proposal (2-big, 59% and below completed Completed within 9 months to 1
1 medium, submitted letter of ntent research were implemented year
1
small)

● Promoted, managed and MOVs:

maintained the health of -localized policy (if any)
school children and reduce -accomplishment reports
morbidity among them -terminal reports
-documentation
Mandated Porgrams
1. National Drug Education Program
2. Deworming and Immunization
3. School Based Feeding Program
4. Mental Health Awareness Program

4 out 4 programs were implemented

September
2021 ro 3% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 90-100% of the
learners/beneficiaries were Implemented on the specified
5 captured schedule
KRA 2: 3 out 4 programs were implemented 80-89% of the Implemented one (1) week after
LEARNING 4
learners/beneficiaries were specfiied scheduled date
ENVIRONMENT 2 out 4 programs were implemented capturedof the
70-79% Implemented two(2) weeks after
3 learners/beneficiaries were specified scheduled
(10%)
captured
1 out 4 programs were implemented 60-69% of the Implemented three (3) weeks
2
learners/beneficiaries were after specified scheduled
captured
59% and belowof the Implemented one (1) month
1 0 out 4 programs were implemented learners/beneficiaries were after specified scheduled
● Managed and implemented MOVs: captured
the School’s AIP in the 1. Approved WFP and AIP reflecting
conduct of regular and School Maintenance
yearly School Facilities and 2. Documentation before and after
Maintenance. 3. Scope of implementation
4. Updated School Facilities
Inventory

1. School Gate & Fence

2. Maintenance of School Grounds
3. Maintenance of school facilities
4. Functional WASH Facilities
5. Proper/updated classroom
structuring
September
2021 ro 3% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
90-100% projects implemented 5 out 5 were implemnted om
5 5 of 5 indicators were evident. were sustained/maintained scheduled date

4 of 5 indicators were evident. 80-89% projects implemented were 4 out 5 were implemented on
4 sustained/maintained shceduled date
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
September
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 2021 ro 3% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
3 of 5 indicators were evident. 70-79% projects implemented were 3 out 5 were implemented on
3 sustained/maintained scheduled date

2 of 5 indicators were evident. 60-69% projects implemented were 2 out 5 were implemented on
2 sustained/maintained scheduled date

1 of 5 indicators were evident. 59% and below projects 1 out 5 were implemented on
1 implemented were scheduled date
sustained/maintained
● Established/reconstituted MOVs:
their School Disaster Risk -school policy
Reduction and -reports
Management (SDRRM) -information materials
Committee -Action Plan

Mandated Porgrams:
- Earthquake Drill
- Fire Drill
- Tsunami Drill
- School DRRM Contingency Plan
- COVID Protocols
- Mental Health Psychosocial
- First Aid Activity
- Climate Change Adaptation
September Activity
2021 ro 2% -Armed Conflict Awareness 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
9 out 9 were implemented

90-100% safety signages were

5 maintained Submitted report on time
80-90% safety signages were submitted report one (1) week
4 8 out 9 were implemented after the time
maintained
70-79% saftey signages were submitted report two (2) weeks
3 7 out 9 were implemented after the time
maintained
60-69% safety signages were submitted report three (3) weeks
2 6 out 9 were implemented after the time
maintained
59% and below safety signages submitted report one (1) month
1 5 out 9 were implemented
were maintained after the time
● Implemented the DepEd MOVs:
mandated PPA’s on YFD -Memorandum
within the school year -Accomplishment Report
-YFD Plan

Managed all mandated DepEd:

•Elections on SPG/SSG
•SPG & SSG Action Plan
•Drugs Awareness & Campaign
•Establish Gulayan Sa Paaralan
•YES-O and Action Plan
•SIGA-Ornamental and Flowering
Plants, Endemic Plants & Trees
•Child Protection
September
2021 ro 2% 7 out 7 were conducted
June 2022

90-100% projects implemented Conducted on the specified

5 were sustained scheduled
80-89% projects implemented were Conducted one (1) week late on
4 6 out of 7 were conducted sustained the specified scheduled
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
September
2021 ro 2%
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
June 2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
5 out of 7 were conducted 70-79% projects implemented were Conducted two (2) weeks late on
3 sustained the specified scheduled
60-69% projects implemented were Conducted three (3) weeks late
2 4 out of 7were conducted sustained on the specified scheduled
59% and below projects Conducted one (1) month late
1 3 out 7 were conducted
implemented were sustained on the specified scheduled
● Conducted at least one (1)
INSET and ten (10) LAC MOVs:
sessions to enhance -Approved INSET Proposal
teachers’ pedagogical -Proposal based on teacher’s needs
content knowledge (PCK) (Needs based on e-SAT result,
skills DepEd PDP dev plan, school
development need)
-Attendance Sheet
-Accomplishment Report
-INSET evaluation
-Documentation/IMS/Pictures
September
2021 ro 4% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 5 out 5 indicators were evident Conducted at least one (1) INSET Conducted sessions on the
5 and 10 LAC sessions specified scheduled
KRA 3: 4 out 5 indicators were evident Conducted 1 INSET and 8-9 LAC Conducted one (1) week late on
HUMAN RESOURCE 4 sessions the specified scheduled
MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT 3 out 5 indicators were evident Conducted 1 INSET and 6-7 LAC Conducted two (2) weeks late on
3 sessions the specified scheduled
(10%) 2 out 5 indicators were evident Conducted 1 INSET and 4-5 LAC Conducted three (3) weeks late
2 sessions on the specified scheduled

Conducted 1 INSET and 2-3 LAC Conducted one (1) month late
1 1 out 5 indicators were evident sessions on the specified scheduled
● Provided technical MOVs:
assistance on HRD to - Technical Assistance
teachers and non-teaching - Agreement duly signed
personnel pertaining to - Personnel Pictorial Reports
personal and professional - TA Plan
development every month -Summary report

5out 5 indicators were evident

September
5 at least 50% were provided TA TA were provided on time
2021 ro 4% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 4 out 5 indicators were evident at least 40% were provided TA TA were provided one (1) week
4 late
3 out 5 indicators were evident at least 30% were provided TA TA were provided two(2) weeks
3 late
at least 20% were provided TA TA were provided three (3)
2 2 out 5 indicators were evident weeks late

at least 10% were provided TA TA were provided one (1) month

1 1 out 5 indicators were evident late
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
● Participated to relevant MOVs
Leadership Management -Certificate of Participation
training/seminars in the -Itinerary of Travel
district, division and - documentation on re-echoed
regional level to improve conducted
managerial skills.
Trainings/Seminars
Face-to-face/Virtual 1- National
- 1 National -1 regional
- 1 Regional -5 divisions
- 5 Division -3 district
- 3 District
September attended 1 national, 1 region, 5
2021 ro 2% division and 3 district 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022  
conducted roll-out one (1) week
5 90-100% attended were roll-out after training/seminar
attended 1 region, 4 division and 2 80-89% attended were roll-out conducted roll-out two (2) weeks
4 district after training/seminar
attended 3 division and 1 district 70-79% attended were roll-out conducted roll-out three (3)
3 weeks after training/seminar
attended 2 division and 1 district 60-69% attended were roll-out conducted roll-out one (1) month
2 after training/seminar
attended 1 division and 1 district 59% and below attended were roll- conducted roll-out two (2)
1 out months after training/seminar
KRA 4: ● Engaged parents and MOVs:
PARENT'S others stakeholders in the - Duly signed and notarized
INVOLVEMENT AND 2021 Brigada Eskwela with MOA/MOU
COMMUNITY 85% participation and -Deed of Donation
PARTNERSHIPS accomplishment in -Deed of Acceptance
(5%) response to the CIVID 19 -Donations and Cost Report
situation. -BE Accomplishment Report
-Pictures of Donations
Sizes
Urban
•Small Schools- (20
Big-50,000 & above
teachers below)
Medium- 40,000
•Medium Schools (21-50 5 out 5 indicators were evident
Small- 39,000 & below
teachers)
•Big Schools (51-Above)
island/Hinterland
Big- 30,000 & above
Location
Medium- 10,001-29,999 Submitted copy of MOA/DOA
Island Schools/Hinterland
5 Small- 10,000 & below one (1) week after donations
Uban Schools
Urban Submitted copy of MOA/DOA
Big- 40,000 to 50,000 two (2) weeks after donations
Medium- 30,000
Small- 20,000
4 out 5 indicators were evident Island/Hinterland
4
Big- 20,000
Medium -15,000
Small- 10,000
September
2021 ro 2.5% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 Urban
Big- 35,000
Medium- 25,000
Small- 15,000
Island/Hinterland Submitted copy of MOA/DOA
3 3 out 5 indicators were evident
Big- 15,000 three (3) weeks after donations
Medium -10,000
Small- ,5,000
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: September Position:
2021 ro 2.5% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
Review Period: Date of Review:
June 2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Urban
Big- 30,000
Medium- 20,000
Small- 10,000 Submitted copy of MOA/DOA
2 2 out 5 indicators were evident Island/Hinterland one (1) month after donations
Big- 10,000
Medium -5,000
Small- 3,000
Urban
Big- 25,000
Medium- 20,000
Small- 10,000 Submitted copy of MOA/DOA
1 1 out 5 indicators were evident Island/Hinterland two (2) months after donations
Big- 5,000
Medium -3,000
Small- 2,000
● Supervised Home Room MOVs:
PTA/ GPTA convergence -Memorandum
and strictly adheres to -Letters to Parents/Stakeholders
D.O. 54 s. 2009.(face-to- -Minutes of the meeting
face/virtual) -Copy of GPTA/HPTA Officers
-Attendance
 
5 out 5 indicators were evident
September Conducted two (2) GPTA and (4)
2021 ro 1.5% 5 HPTA 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
4 out 5 indicators were evident Conducted one (1) GPTA and (4)
4
HPTA
3 out 5 indicators were evident Conducted one (1) GPTA and
3 HPTA twice a years

2 2 out 5 indicators were evident conducted three (3) HPTA

1 2 out 5 indicators were evident conducted one (1) HPTA
● Implemented Project MOVs:
W.A.T.C.H. in the school -Project W.A.T.C.H. Action Plan
-Organization of WATCH Club
'-Project WATCH Activities
a. Launching of Project WATCH
c. Project WATCH innovative
activities
c. Community Services on Project
WATCH  

September 3 out 4 activiies implemented

2021 ro 1% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
3 out 4 activiies implemented with
5 terminal report
2 out 4 activiies implemented 2 out 4 activiies implemented with
4 terminal report
1 out 4 activiies implemented 1 out 4 activiies implemented with
3 terminal report
0 out 4 activiies implemented 0 out 4activiies implemented with
2 terminal report
1 No activity implemented No report
KRA 5: ● Improved School 5 0% drop out rate
SCHOOL Performance Indicators on 4 .1-.5% drop out rate
September
LEADERSHIP, Drop-out rate 3 .6-1% drop out rate
2021 ro 3% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
MANAGEMENT AND
June 2022 2 1.1-1.5 % drop out rate
OPERATIONS
(35%) 1 1.6-2% drop out rate
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

KRA 5:
SCHOOL TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
LEADERSHIP,
MANAGEMENT AND

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's
OPERATIONS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
(35%) QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
● Improved School 3% and above increase in
Performance Indicators on 5
enrolment
enrolment rate
4 increase by 2.5-2.99%
September
2021 ro 2% 3 increase by 2-2.4% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
2 increase by 1-1.99%

1 increase by 0.5-0.9%
● SIP/Annual Implementation MOVs:
Plan (AIP) Implementation -Approved AIP
Compliance (Ref. ISO Doc- -Evaluated AIP
SGD-SME CIP) -result of evaluation

95-100% pressing issues were

captured
5 100% activities were implemented Approved AIP on December
September
90-94% pressing issues were 90- 99% activities were
2021 ro 5% 4 captured 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
implemented Approved AIP on January
June 2022
85-89%pressing issues were 80-89% activities were implemented
3 captured
Approved AIP on February
80-84% pressing issues were 70-79% activities were implemented Approved AIP on March
2 captured

75-79% pressing issues were 69% and below activities were Approved AIP on April
1 captured implemented
● SBM Level of Practice and 90-100% SBM indicators were Level II SBM rating (2.75-3.0)
Performance Improvement 5 implemented

80-89% SBM indicators were Level II SBM Assessment rating

4 implemented (2.50-2.74)
'September
2021 ro 5% 70-79% SBM indicators were Level II SBM Rating (1.75-2.49) 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
3 implemented
June 2022
60-69% SBM indicators were Level II SBM Rating (1.50- 1.74)
2 implemented

59% and below indicators were Level II SBM rating (0.50-1.49)

1 implemented

● Managed and properly Elem & Non-IUs

liquidated the School 100% complete and correct of the
MOOE, SBFP other liquidation report
government advances and
submit liquidation 5 Implementing Unit
documents on time within 100% complete and correct of the
the fiscal year Monthly report
Elem & Non-IUs
90-99% complete and correct of the
liquidation report
4 Implementing Unit
90-99% complete and correct of the
Monthly report
12 out 12 funds were utlized
Submitted liquidation report on
the 1st-5th day of the following
month or earlier
100% BUR were utulized
10 -11 out 12 funds were utlized
Submitted liquidation report on
the 6th-15th day of the following
month
90-99% BUR were utulized

September
2021 ro 20% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022
 ● Managed and properly
liquidated the School
MOOE, SBFP other
government advances and OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
submit liquidation
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
documents on time within
Position: the fiscal year Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Elem & Non-IUs
80-89% complete and correct of the
liquidation report 8-9 out 12 funds were utlized
September Submitted liquidation report on
2021 ro 20% 3 the 16th-31st day of the 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 Implementing Unit following month
80-89% complete and correct of the
Monthly report
80-89% BUR were utilized

Elem & Non-IUs 6-7 out 12 funds were utlized

70-79% complete and correct of the
Submitted liquidation report 2
2 liquidation report
months after
Implementing Unit
70-79% complete and correct of the
Monthly report 70-79% BUR were tulized

Elem & Non-IUs 5 out 12 funds were utlized

69% complete and correct of the
Submitted liquidation report 3
1 liquidation report
months after
Implementing Unit
69% complete and correct of the
Monthly report 69% BUR were tulized
Plus Factor ● Performed other functions MOVs:
such as Division TWG or -Certificate of Recognition
Coordinatorship and -certificate of
received recognition both attendance/participation
curricular and co-curricular - Memorandum from CO approved
activities within the year. September by the SDS
2021 ro 5% 5 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
June 2022 National Recognition
4 Regional Recognition
3 Division Recognition
2 Quadrant Recognition
1 District Recognition

100% 0.00

LEGEND:
Ratee: Rater: 4.5 - 5.0 - O
0 .5 - 4.499 - VS
0 .5 - 3.499 - S
.5 - 2.499 - US
Approving Authority:

Page 6 of 6
 CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF

WEIGHT
KRA's OBJECTIVES / MOVs REMARKS / SUGGESTIONS
PER KRA
● Performed instructional monitoring to teachers to increase
1. Instructional Monitoring Plan
their competence in the delivery of distance learning
modalities with a monthly target of at least 10 teachers. 2. Instructional Monitoring Report with Analysis
15% 3.-SLMs Monitoring Report
4. LDM summary feedback Report
5. LDM Analysis Report
KRA 1: ● Provided Technical Assistance to teachers in the 1. Accomplished LDM Feedback Report
INSTRUCTIONAL implementation of Distance Learning Modality (LDM) 2. Approved TA Plan LDM
LEADERSHIP 15% 3. Approved TA Plan SLM
(35%) 4. -TA Report for LDM
5. TA Report for SLM
● Conducted Research on Curriculum and instruction 1. Approved Research Proposal
2. Appproved endorsement letter
5% 3. Certificate of completion
4. completed research paper
5. Evidence of Implementation
● Promoted, managed and maintained the health of school 1. National Drug Education Program Report
children and reduce morbidity among them 2. Deworming and Immunization Report
3% 3. School Based Feeding Program Report
4. Mental Health Awareness Program Report
5. OK sa DepEd Report
● Managed and implemented the School’s AIP in the conduct
1. Approved WFP and AIP reflecting School
of regular and yearly School Facilities and Maintenance. Maintenance
2. Documentation before and after
3%
3. Scope of implementation
4. Updated School Facilities Inventory
● Established/reconstituted their School Disaster Risk 1. Earthquake Drill report
Reduction and Management (SDRRM) Committee 2. Fire Drill report
KRA 2: 3. School DRRM Contingency Plan
SCHOOL 4. COVID Protocols
RESOURCE 2% Psychosocial report
MANAGEMENT 6. First Aid Activity report
(10%) 7. Climate Change Adaptation Activity report
8. Armed Conflict Awareness report
9. Action Plan
Implemented the DepEd mandated PPA’s on YFD 1. Elections on SPG/SSG report
within the school year 2. SPG & SSG Action Plan
3. Drugs Awareness & Campaign report
4. Establish Gulayan Sa Paaralan report
2%
5. YES-O and Action Plan
6. SIGA report
7. Child Protection report
8. YFD Plan
● Conducted at least one (1) INSET and ten (10) LAC 1. Approved INSET Proposal
KRA 3: sessions to enhance teachers’ pedagogical content 2. Proposal based on teacher’s Need
HUMAN RESOURCE knowledge (PCK) skills 4% 3. Attendance Sheet
MANAGEMENT AND 4. INSET evaluation
DEVELOPMENT
(10%)
5. Documentation/IMS/Pictures
● Provided technical assistance on HRD to teachers and 1. Technical Assistance
non-teaching personnel pertaining to personal and 2. Agreement duly signed
professional development every month 4% 3. Personnel Pictorial Reports
4. TA Plan
5. Summary report
● Participated to relevant Leadership Management 1. Certificate of Participation
training/seminars in the district, division and regional level 2. Itinerary of Travel
to improve managerial skills.- 1 National, 1 Regional, 5 2%
3. documentation on re-echoed
Division &3 District
4. Memorandum
● Engaged parents and others stakeholders in the 2021 1. Duly signed and notarized MOA/MOU
KRA 4: Brigada Eskwela with 85% participation and 2. Deed of Donation
PARENT'S accomplishment in response to the CIVID 19 situation. 3. Deed of Acceptance
INVOLVEMENT AND 2.5%
4. Donations and Cost Report
COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIPS
5. -BE Accomplishment Report
6. Pictures of Donations
● Supervised Home Room PTA/ GPTA convergence and 1. Memorandum
strictly adheres to D.O. 54 s. 2009.(face-to-face/virtual) 2. Letters to Parents/Stakeholders
1.5% 3. Minutes of the meeting
4. Copy of GPTA/HPTA Officers
5. Attendance
● Implemented Project W.A.T.C.H. in the school 1. Project W.A.T.C.H. Action Plan
2. Organization of WATCH Club
1%
3. Project WATCH Activities
4. Community Services on Project
WATCH  Report
● Improved School Performance Indicators on Drop-out rate 3% 1. Drop-out rate
● Improved School Performance Indicators on enrolment rate
2% 1. Enrolment Report
● SIP/Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) Implementation 1. Approved AIP for 2021-202
Compliance (Ref. ISO Doc- SGD-SME CIP) 5%

KRA 5:
SCHOOL
 CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF

WEIGHT
KRA's OBJECTIVES / MOVs REMARKS / SUGGESTIONS
● SIP/Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) Implementation PER KRA
Compliance (Ref. ISO Doc- SGD-SME CIP) 5% 2. Evaluated AIP for 2020-21
3. result of evaluation of 2020-21
● SBM Level of Practice and Performance Improvement 1. Result of the SBM Evaluation
KRA 5: 2. Documents for SBM
5%
SCHOOL 3. Pictures of the Implementation
LEADERSHIP, 4. Terminla Report
MANAGEMENT AND ● Managed and properly liquidated the School MOOE, SBFP
1. Certificate of Timely Submission of
OPERATIONS other government advances and submit liquidation Liquidation Report
2. Liquidation Report
documents on time within the fiscal year 3. Certificate on the utilization rate from the
20%
accounting
4. Certification from the Accounting on the
liquidation/Monthly Report
● Performed other functions such as Division TWG or 1. Certificate of Recognition
Coordinatorship and received recognition both curricular 2. certificate of attendance/participation
and co-curricular activities within the year. 5%
3. Memorandum from CO approved by the SDS

Total 100%

Ratee: ______________________________

Rater: _______________________________

Approving : _________________________________
Name: ________________________________
School: _______________________________

KRA 1 Objectives MOVs Performance Indicators RATING

Performed MOVs QUALITY
instructional -Instructional Monitoring 5 All indicators are evident
monitoring to Plan 4 3 indicators are evident
teachers to increase - Instructional Monitoring
3 2 indicators are evident
their competence in Report with Analysis
the delivery of - SLMs Monitoring Report 2 1 indicators are evident

distance learning - LDM summary feedback 1 no indicator is evident

modalities with a report EFFICIENCY
monthly target of at - LDM analysis Report 5 monitored at least 10 teachers per month
least 10 teachers. 4 monitored at least 8 of the teachers per month
3 monitored at least 6 teachers per month
2 monitored at least 4 teachers per month
1 monitored at least 2 of the teachers per month
Provided Technical MOVs: QUALITY
Assistance to -Approved Research 5 All indicators are evident
teachers in the Proposal 4 4 indicators were evident
implementation of -SDS approved the
Distance Learning conduct of the study 3 3 indicators were evident
Modality (LDM) -Certificate of Completion 2 2 indicators were evident
- Evidence of 1 1 indicators were evident
implementation TIMELINESS
5 Submitted report on the due date
4 Submitted report 3 days after due date
3 Submitted report 6 days after
due date
2 Submitted report on the 7th day onward after the
due date
1 Submitted report on the 8th day onward after the
due date
Conducted MOVs: QUALITY
Research on -Approved Research 5 Completed resesearches (3-Big,2Medium and 1
Curriculum and Proposal Small)
instruction -SDS approved the 4 Completed resesearches (2-Big,1 Medium and 2
conduct of the study approved proposals)
-Certificate of Completion 3 Completed resesearches (1-Big,1 Medium and 1
- Evidence of approved proposal Small)
implementation 2 Approved research proposal (3-big, 2 medium, 1
approved proposal
1 Approved research proposal (2-big, 1 medium,
submitted letter of ntent small)
EFFICIENCY
5 90-100% completed research were implemented
4 80-89% completed research were implemented
3 70-79% completed research were implemented
2 60-69% completed research were implemented
1 59% and below completed research were
implemented
TIMELINESS
5 Completed within 5.5 months
4 Completed within 5.7 months.
3 Completed within 6 months.
2 Completed within 7-8 months.
1 Completed within 9 months to 1 year
Evaluated by:
___________________________________