Volume II - 05 - E - Hydro Logical Investigation

HYDROLOGIC INVESTIGATION
PERMANENTE QUARRY RECLAMATION PLAN UPDATE SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
REPORT
Submitted To: Lehigh Southwest Cement Company 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California 95014
Submitted By: Golder Associates Inc. 425 Lakeside Drive Sunnyvale, California 94085 Golder Associates Inc. 18300 NE Union Hill Road, Suite 200 Redmond, Washington 98052
May 2010
Project No. 063-7109
May 2010
ES-1
063-7109
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) prepared this report for Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (Lehigh) in support of permitting and reclamation efforts related to development and reclamation of the proposed South Quarry, and concurrent reclamation of the existing North Quarry, located at the Lehigh Permanente Quarry (the Site) in Santa Clara County, California. The objective of this report is to provide an overall characterization of the hydrologic conditions of the Site such that (1) the current conditions are documented and (2) potential changes to the hydrologic systems associated with future mining and reclamation efforts are evaluated. The hydrologic investigations, starting in 2008 continuing through January 2010, comprised a series of tasks directed toward an evaluation of surface water and groundwater occurrence, flow, and chemistry. The tasks included historical research, hydraulic testing (pumping and packer tests), collecting and analyzing groundwater elevation and stream flow data, and collecting and analyzing of surface water, groundwater, mine water, rock core, and wall washing samples. The results from the hydrologic investigations were used to further our understanding in developing a site conceptual model, and as the foundation of a groundwater numerical model (MODFLOW). The numerical model was developed to evaluate potential hydrogeologic changes associated with future mining and reclamation activities.
Hydrology Discussion
The following current hydrologic conditions were determined by Golder: Two separate stream drainages are present: Monte Bello Creek located approximately 700 feet from the South Quarry perimeter; and Permanente Creek situated between the existing North Quarry and South Quarry. Permanente Creek tends to be dry adjacent to the North Quarry in dry months, while surface water flows occur both upstream of and downstream from the North Quarry throughout the year. Groundwater flow is preferentially within the more permeable limestone units compared to the greenstone and graywacke. However, because the limestone units occur as large blocks, and are of limited extent, the limestone units behave as a compartmentalized, isolated hydrogeologic system and the overall groundwater system is controlled by the less permeable greenstone and graywacke units. Locally, groundwater flow is primarily to the north and northeast from a groundwater divide located beneath the ridge separating Permanente Creek from Monte Bello Creek. The average annual baseflow for water year 2009 was estimated to be 0.30 cubic feet per second (cfs) along the upper section of Permanente Creek south of the West Materials Storage Area and approximately 1 cfs approximately 500 feet downstream of the North Quarry dewatering discharge point. The average annual baseflow for Monte Bello Creek for water year 2009 was estimated to be 0.08 cfs upstream of the South Quarry and 0.14 cfs downstream of the South Quarry. The North Quarry acts as a sump and is subject to groundwater seepage into the quarry excavation. During the dry season it is estimated that the ambient groundwater seepage into the North Quarry is about 200 gpm.
hydrologic report_ final
May 2010
ES-2
063-7109
During future mining activities, the following changes are estimated based on the modeling results: The average annual groundwater inflow into the North Quarry will initially increase by approximately 60 gpm as the North Quarry is deepened to 440 ft amsl. The groundwater inflow rate in the North Quarry will subsequently decrease as the North Quarry is reclaimed (backfilled) from 440 to 990 ft amsl and the South Quarry is excavated. Since the South Quarry will be shallower, sustained groundwater inflow into the South Quarry will be up to an estimated 90 gpm, and will not occur until the base of the South Quarry is at its lowest elevation. Similar to the North Quarry, the groundwater inflow rate will decrease as the South Quarry is reclaimed (backfilled) to a minimum elevation of 1,110 ft amsl. The simultaneous development of the South Quarry, and the reclamation of the North Quarry, will have no measurable impact on groundwater discharge to Monte Bello Creek and to the upper reaches of Permanente Creek. A decrease in groundwater discharge to the middle reach of Permanente Creek (i.e., adjacent to the quarry) of 0.1 cfs (40 gpm) is estimated to occur with the deepening of the North Quarry. However, once the North Quarry is reclaimed and fully backfilled, then the middle reach of Permanente Creek will receive 0.46 cfs (206 gpm) more groundwater discharge than under current conditions. The predicted annual average post-mining water elevation in the South Quarry is below the minimum backfill elevation for the South Quarry; therefore, the development of a pit lake is not anticipated based on the available data. The estimated average annual inflow from all sources (groundwater, surface water, and precipitation) to the South Quarry at equilibrium is 26 gpm. The post-mining water level in the North Quarry will reach a maximum elevation equal to the backfill elevation of 990 ft amsl (which is the low-point surface water overflow to Permanente Creek). At equilibrium, the estimated total annual average inflow (groundwater, surface water, and precipitation) into the North Quarry is 169 gpm. These quantities are expected to discharge to Permanente Creek primarily as groundwater depending on the permeability of the materials separating the quarry from the creek. During periods of intense rainfall, and during seasonal high groundwater conditions, there is a potential that discharge from the reclaimed North Quarry to Permanente Creek may occur as surface water if appropriate water management techniques are not employed. The planned quarry expansion will have no significant impact to groundwater levels in supply wells located along Monte Bello Ridge, approximately between and one mile from the center of the South Quarry. Therefore, operation of these wells, or any other nearby wells, will not be adversely affected by the planned quarry expansion and subsequent reclamation.
Current Geochemistry Conditions

The objective of the geochemical evaluation was to establish and document current conditions for surface water and groundwater quality. Water quality conditions were characterized over a one-year period. The program entailed sampling of five groundwater wells within the proposed South Quarry, three surface water locations (two at Permanente Creek and one at Monte Bello Creek), and mine water quality from the North Quarry. Furthermore, to evaluate the environmental behavior of geologic materials present at the proposed quarry, geochemical characterization of overburden (rock and soil) and ore materials was conducted. Both laboratory and field-scale testing (wall wash sampling) were conducted to evaluate the potential for metal leaching. A separate report discusses the analysis of collected data and projected water quality.
May 2010
063-7109
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION
HYDROLOGIC INVESTIGATION PERMANENTE QUARRY RECLAMATION PLAN UPDATE SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MAY 2010
Submitted To: Lehigh Southwest Cement Company 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California 95014
Prepared By: Golder Associates Inc. 425 Lakeside Drive Sunnyvale, California 94085 Golder Associates Inc. 18300 NE Union Hill Road, Suite 200 Redmond, Washington 98052
This report has been reviewed and approved by:
William L. Fowler, P.G., C.E.G. Associate/Senior Consultant
David Banton Principal/Practice Leader
May 2010
063-7109
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 1.1 1.2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 Objective ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Operations ............................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Project ................................................................................................................... 2
1.1.1 1.1.2 1.3 1.4 2.0 2.1 2.2
Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................... 3 Project Team ................................................................................................................................. 4 REGIONAL SETTING ....................................................................................................................... 6 Topography ................................................................................................................................... 6 Geologic Setting ............................................................................................................................ 6 Franciscan Terrane ............................................................................................................... 7 Santa Clara Formation .......................................................................................................... 7 Surficial Deposits................................................................................................................... 8 Alluvium ............................................................................................................................. 8 Colluvium........................................................................................................................... 8 Landslide Deposits ............................................................................................................ 8
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3
2.2.3.1 2.2.3.2 2.2.3.3 2.3 2.4 3.0 3.1
Structural Setting ........................................................................................................................... 9 Hydrogeologic Setting ................................................................................................................... 9 DATA COLLECTION ....................................................................................................................... 10 Hydrologic data ........................................................................................................................... 10 Precipitation......................................................................................................................... 10 Stream Monitoring ............................................................................................................... 10 Well and Piezometer Installation ......................................................................................... 10 Airlift Testing........................................................................................................................ 11 Packer Tests ....................................................................................................................... 12 Pumping Tests .................................................................................................................... 12 Groundwater Level Monitoring ............................................................................................ 12 Groundwater Quality Sampling ........................................................................................... 13 Surface Water Quality Sampling ......................................................................................... 14 Wall Washing and North Quarry Sampling ......................................................................... 14 Quality Control..................................................................................................................... 15
3.1.1 3.1.2 3.2 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 4.0 4.1
Hydrogeologic Data ..................................................................................................................... 10
Geochemical Data ....................................................................................................................... 12
CURRENT HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS.............................................................................. 16 Site Setting .................................................................................................................................. 16 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 16 Surface Water Flow ............................................................................................................. 16 4.1.1 4.1.2
May 2010 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.3 4.4
ii
063-7109
Seeps and Springs .............................................................................................................. 17 Geologic Units ..................................................................................................................... 17 Geologic Structure .............................................................................................................. 17 Limestone ............................................................................................................................ 18 Greenstone.......................................................................................................................... 19 Graywacke .......................................................................................................................... 19
Hydrogeologic Units .................................................................................................................... 18
Water Level Response ................................................................................................................ 19 Hydraulic Properties .................................................................................................................... 21 Packer Test Results ............................................................................................................ 21 Constant-Rate Pumping Test .............................................................................................. 21 Pumped Well Response and Interpretation .................................................................... 22 Observation Well Responses and Interpretation ............................................................ 22 Analysis Results and Interpretation................................................................................. 22
4.4.1 4.4.2
4.4.2.1 4.4.2.2 4.4.2.3 4.5 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.6 4.6.1 4.6.2
Groundwater Flow Conditions ..................................................................................................... 24 Groundwater Levels and Flow ............................................................................................ 24 Hydraulic Gradients ............................................................................................................. 24 Approach ............................................................................................................................. 25 Hydrologic Data ................................................................................................................... 25 Precipitation..................................................................................................................... 25 Permanente Creek Flow ................................................................................................. 26 Monte Bello Creek Flow .................................................................................................. 26 North Quarry Pumping .................................................................................................... 27 Permanente Creek .......................................................................................................... 28 Monte Bello Creek ........................................................................................................... 28 North Quarry.................................................................................................................... 28
Water Balance ............................................................................................................................. 25
4.6.2.1 4.6.2.2 4.6.2.3 4.6.2.4 4.6.3 4.6.3.1 4.6.3.2 4.6.3.3 4.7 5.0 5.1 5.2
Water Balance Estimates .................................................................................................... 28
Groundwater Recharge ............................................................................................................... 29 HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODELING ............................................................................................... 30 Modeling Objectives .................................................................................................................... 30 Conceptual Model Description .................................................................................................... 30
5.2.1 Groundwater Flow ...................................................................................................................... 31 5.2.2 Recharge and Discharge ........................................................................................................... 31 5.3 Numerical Groundwater Flow Model ........................................................................................... 31 Model Code ......................................................................................................................... 31 Model Geometry .................................................................................................................. 32 Layering and Hydrostratigraphy .......................................................................................... 32 Hydraulic Properties ............................................................................................................ 32 Boundary Conditions ........................................................................................................... 32 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 5.3.4 5.3.5
May 2010 5.3.6
iii
063-7109
Model Calibration ................................................................................................................ 33 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 33 Calibration Results (Current Conditions)......................................................................... 33 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 36 Simulation Results........................................................................................................... 37
5.3.6.1 5.3.6.2 5.3.7 5.3.7.1 5.3.7.2 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 6.0 6.1 6.2
Simulation of Quarry Development and Reclamation ......................................................... 36
Post-Mining Quarry Water Balance............................................................................................. 39 Approach ............................................................................................................................. 39 Results ................................................................................................................................ 40
GEOCHEMICAL DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW ................................................................... 41 Objectives.................................................................................................................................... 41 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................ 41 Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring .......................................................... 41 North Quarry Mine Water Quality Monitoring Data ............................................................. 42 North Quarry Storm Water Monitoring ................................................................................ 42 Published Data - Regional Water Quality Data Compilation ............................................... 42 Geochemical Laboratory Testing ........................................................................................ 43 Geochemical Field Testing Pit Wall Washing .................................................................. 44 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program ....................................................................... 45 Water Quality Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 45 Groundwater Quality ....................................................................................................... 45 Surface Water Quality ..................................................................................................... 46
6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.3 6.3.1
Monitoring Results ...................................................................................................................... 45 6.3.1.1 6.3.1.2
6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5
North Quarry Mine Water Quality Monitoring Data ............................................................. 47 North Quarry Storm Water Monitoring ................................................................................ 48 Regional Water Quality Data Compilation .......................................................................... 48 Geochemical Laboratory Testing ........................................................................................ 49 Acid Generation Potential ............................................................................................... 49 Sulfide Occurrence Sample Representativeness ........................................................ 49 Elemental Concentration and Metal Leaching Potential ................................................. 50
6.3.5.1 6.3.5.2 6.3.5.3 6.3.6 6.3.7 7.0
Geochemical Field Testing Pit Wall Washing .................................................................. 51 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ...................................................................................... 52
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 53
List of Tables
Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Table 3.3 Table 4.1 Table 4.2 Table 4.3 Stream Monitoring Station Summary Borehole Completion Summary Analytical Parameter Summary Distribution of Rock Types within Geologic Model Rock Masses Summary of Groundwater Level Responses (October 2009 Rainstorm Event) Summary of Hydraulic Properties from Packer Testing
May 2010 Table 4.4 Table 4.5 Table 4.6 Table 4.7 Table 5.1 Table 5.2 Table 5.3 Table 5.4 Table 5.5 Table 5.6 Table 5.7 Table 6.1 Table 6.2 Table 6.3 Table 6.4 Table 6.5 Table 6.6 Table 6.7 Table 6.8 Table 6.9 Table 6.10 Table 6.11 Table 6.12
iv
063-7109
Summary of Hydraulic Properties from Constant-Rate Pumping Test Los Altos Hills Station (LSA) Water Balance Summary North Quarry Water Balance 2009 Modeled Annual Groundwater Budget (Current Conditions) Observed and Modeled Groundwater Discharge to Creeks Modeled Hydraulic Conductivity Values Summary of Quarry Development and Reclamation Phasing Summary of Predicted Changes in Groundwater Discharge Compared to Current Conditions Summary of Inflows in North Quarry Summary of Inflows in South Quarry Groundwater Wells Completion Details and Sulfide Occurrence Permanente Creek Storm Water Monitoring Locations Overburden and Ore Composite Samples Summary of Geochemical Analyses Wall Washing Sampling Locations Groundwater and Surface Water Quality Data Summary - Select Parameters Summary of Selected PER070 Water Quality Results Acid Base Accounting Results Overburden and Ore Composite Samples - Drill Log Descriptions Geologic Logs Summary of Pyrite Occurrence Overburden and Ore - TTLC and STLC Results Wall Washing Results
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2 Figure 1.3 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5 Figure 2.6 Figure 3.1 Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 Figure 4.3 Figure 4.4 Figure 4.5 Figure 4.6 Figure 4.7 Figure 4.8 Figure 4.9 Figure 4.10 Figure 4.11 Figure 4.12 Figure 4.13 Figure 4.14 Figure 4.15 Figure 4.16 Figure 4.17 Figure 4.18 Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 Figure 5.3 Regional Location Map Project Overview Final Reclamation Plan Regional Topographic Setting Local Topographic Setting Regional Geologic Map Geologic Compilation Map Geological Cross Sections Regional Geotectonic Map Monitoring Locations Groundwater Levels Relative Groundwater Changes HG-10S Drawdown and Recovery Semi-Log Plot HG-10S Drawdown and Recovery Derivative Log-Log Plot Corrected Drawdown Hydrographs for Observation Wells Theis Partial Penetration Analysis Results from AQTESOLV Theis Partial Penetration Analysis Results from AQTESOLV Distance vs. Drawdown Semi-Log Plot Groundwater Elevation Contour Map North Quarry Water Level - February to October 2010 Groundwater Elevation vs. Well Completion Elevation MS-1 Baseflow Separation Hydrograph MS-2 Baseflow Separation Hydrograph MS-3 Baseflow Separation Hydrograph MS-4 Baseflow Separation Hydrograph North Quarry Water Level and Daily Precipitation North Quarry Water Level and Pumping Rate North Quarry Inflow - Existing Condition Model Domain and Boundary Conditions Model Grid and Boundary Conditions - Quarry Area Section North-South Through North Quarry
May 2010 Figure 5.4 Figure 5.5 Figure 5.6 Figure 5.7 Figure 5.8 Figure 5.9 Figure 5.10 Figure 5.11 Figure 5.12 Figure 5.13 Figure 5.14 Figure 5.15 Figure 5.16 Figure 6.1 Figure 6.2 Figure 6.3 Figure 6.4 Figure 6.5 Figure 6.6 Figure 6.7 Figure 6.8 Figure 6.9 Figure 6.10 Figure 6.11 Figure 6.12 Figure 6.13 Figure 6.14 Figure 6.15 Figure 6.16 Figure 6.17 Figure 6.18 Figure 6.19 Figure 6.20 Figure 6.21 Figure 6.22 Figure 6.23 Figure 6.24 Figure 6.25 Figure 6.26 Figure 6.27 Figure 6.28 Figure 6.29 Figure 6.30 Figure 6.31 Figure 6.32
v Section West-East Through North Quarry Model Top Surface - Current Conditions Simulated Current Piezometric Heads Simulated Current Piezometric Heads Quarry Area Calibrated versus Observed heads October 2009 North-South Section Current Conditions North-South Section Phase 1 North-South Section Phase 2 North-South Section Phase 3 North-South Section Phase 4 North-South Section Phase 5 Simulated Piezometric Heads Phase 1 Simulated Piezometric Heads Phase 5 Quarry Precipitation vs. Surface Water and Wall Washing Sampling Events Storm Water Sample Locations Permanente Creek Monitoring Location PER070 (SFBRWQCB, 2007) North Quarry - Wall Washing (November 2009) Wall Washing - Graywacke (GW-01) Wall Washing - Chert Sample (CT-01) Wall Washing - Greenstone (GS-01) Wall Washing - Limestone - Medium to High Grade (MG-01) Wall Washing - Limestone - High Grade (HG-01) Wall Washing - Limestone - High and Medium/Low Grade (HMG-01) Current Water Quality - pH, TDS and Alkalinity Current Water Quality - SO4, NO3 and Cl Current Water Quality - Sb, As and Se Current Water Quality - Mn, Ni and Mo Current Water Quality - V, Zn and Fe Current Water Quality - Ca, Mg and Na Current Water Quality - Hg Groundwater and Surface Water Piper Plot Permanente Creek Storm Water Monitoring Data (January 18, 2006) Permanente Creek Storm Water Monitoring Data (February 27, 2006) Limestone Ore Sulfide-Sulfur Data Overburden (Rock) and Ore - TTLC and STLC Results Overburden (Rock and Soil) and Ore Elemental Concentrations by Rock Type Overburden (Rock and Soil) and Ore - TTLC vs. STLC Wall Washing Samples Water Quality Comparison Ca and Mg Water Quality Comparison Na and SO4 Water Quality Comparison Alkalinity and pH Water Quality Comparison Sb and As Water Quality Comparison Fe and Mm Water Quality Comparison Mo and Ni Water Quality Comparison Se and V
063-7109
List of Appendices
Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Table D-1 Table D-2 Appendix E Boring Logs Hydrographs Packer Test Results Groundwater and Surface Water Quality Results Water Quality Monitoring Results PER070 Water Quality Data Quality Assurance/Quality Control
May 2010
063-7109
1.0 1.1
INTRODUCTION Objective
Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) has prepared this report for Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (Lehigh) in support of permitting and reclamation efforts related to development and reclamation of the proposed South Quarry, and concurrent reclamation of the existing North Quarry, located at the Lehigh Permanente Quarry (the Quarry) in Santa Clara County, California. The objective of this work effort was to provide an overall characterization of the hydrologic and hydrogeologic conditions of the Quarry such that (1) the current conditions are documented and (2) potential changes to the hydrologic systems associated with future proposed mining and reclamation efforts can be evaluated. The hydrologic investigations were initiated in the fall of 2008 with field work continuing through January, 2010. The hydrologic investigations are comprised of a series of tasks directed toward an evaluation of both surface water occurrence, flow and chemistry, and hydrogeologic investigations of the occurrence, flow and chemistry of groundwater. The scope of work completed for the project is discussed in detail in Section 1.3. The background for the overall reclamation project is discussed in Section 1.2.
1.2
1.1.1
Project Background
Existing Operations
The Quarry is a limestone and aggregate mining operation in the unincorporated foothills of western Santa Clara County, approximately two miles west of the City of Cupertino (Figure 1.1). The Quarry occupies a portion of a 3,510-acre property owned by Hanson Permanente Cement, Inc., and is operated by Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (collectively, Lehigh) (Figure 1.2). The Quarry currently comprises approximately 570 acres of operational areas, which consist of surface mining excavations, overburden stockpiling, crushing and processing facilities, access roads, administrative offices and equipment storage. The Quarry also includes other predominantly undisturbed areas, either held in reserve for future mining or which buffer operations from adjacent land uses. The main operational areas of the Quarry are currently as follows: North Quarry: The North Quarry is where mineral extraction currently occurs and has historically taken place. The North Quarry features a large mining pit with elevations that currently range from approximately 750 feet to 1,750 feet above mean sea level (amsl). Limestone and greenstone mined from the North Quarry are crushed and either processed into aggregate products at Lehighs on-site Rock plant or for used for cement manufacture at Lehighs adjacent cement plant.
May 2010
063-7109
East Materials Storage Area (EMSA): The EMSA is located to the east of the North Quarry and is currently the primary storage site for overburden and waste rock. Elevations at the EMSA range from approximately 550 feet to 920 feet amsl. West Materials Storage Area (WMSA): The WMSA is a second overburden and waste rock storage site, located west of the North Quarry. Elevations in the WMSA range from 1,500 to 1,950 feet amsl. The WMSA is approaching the final elevation and contours described in the Quarrys existing reclamation plan. Rock Plant: The Rock Plant is located in the southeast portion of the Quarry, and processes mined material into aggregate products. The Rock Plant occupies gentle slopes from approximately 580 feet to 770 feet amsl. Mining operations take place subject to Californias Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). SMARA mandates that surface mining operations have an approved reclamation plan that describes how mined lands will be prepared for alternative post-mining uses, and how residual hazards will be addressed. Santa Clara County acts as lead agency under SMARA. The County approved the Quarrys current reclamation plan in March 1985, covering 330 acres. A cement manufacturing plant lies adjacent to the Quarry on the east. The cement plant also is owned and operated by Lehigh. The cement plant is a separately- permitted industrial use which is not considered part of the Quarry and is not subject to SMARAs requirements.
1.1.2
Proposed Project
The proposed project is the approval of an amendment to the Quarrys reclamation plan. The proposed amendment would broaden the reclamation plan, and associated reclamation requirements, to include all areas that are currently disturbed by mining activities, and lands scheduled to be disturbed by mining over approximately the next 20 years (Figure 1.3). The amendment would incorporate 1,105 acres of Lehighs 3,510-acre ownership, and address the reclamation of mining activities over approximately the next 20 years. Under the amendment, areas disturbed by mining would be reclaimed for open space uses. The project also is the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for certain mining operations at the Quarry. The CUP would authorize the continuation of mineral extraction in a portion of the planned extraction area south of Permanente Creek known as the South Quarry. Rock mined at the South Quarry would be transported to existing facilities for processing. The South Quarry is included in the proposed reclamation plan amendment and would be reclaimed according to the requirements therein. The proposed reclamation plan amendment and CUP would result in the following conditions and changes at the Quarry: South Quarry: The project would approve a CUP and amend the reclamation plan to provide for concurrent mining and reclamation at the South Quarry. Operations would occur over a period of approximately 20 years, depending on market demands. The South Quarry will be mined in five phases with reclamation following mining within each
May 2010
063-7109
phase. Mined limestone and greenstone would be transported to existing Quarry facilities for crushing and processing. Topsoil Storage Area: The project would amend the reclamation plan to provide for the reclamation of the Topsoil Storage Area, an area located to the south of the Rock Plant. The Topsoil Storage Area would serve to temporarily store topsoil material removed from the South Quarry until such material is needed for reclamation. North Quarry: The project would amend the current reclamation plan for the North Quarry to reflect the use of the North Quarry as a permanent storage site for overburden and waste rock extracted from the South Quarry. Reclamation activities would establish final slopes and vegetation in the North Quarry consistent with the surrounding topography. Central Materials Storage Area (CMSA): The project would amend the reclamation plan to include all planned storage phases for the CMSA, located directly west of EMSA and east of the North Quarry. The proposed reclamation plan amendment would provide final grading contours and revegetation for this area. EMSA: The EMSA is expected to be built out and closed to storage prior to project approval, and reclamation would at that time be in progress. WMSA: The project would amend the current reclamation plan for the WMSA to reflect the transition of the adjacent North Quarry reclaimed fill slopes and tie in these slopes to the WMSAs east side. The project also would update the current WMSA revegetation design. Rock Plant: The project would amend the reclamation plan to provide a reclamation design for the Rock Plant.
1.3
Scope of Work
Golder conducted a detailed hydrologic and hydrogeologic investigation directed toward characterization of surface water and ground water conditions in support of the reclamation project. The general tasks conducted for the investigations are described below, more specific details on each task are provided as necessary, in the following chapters of this report: Research and compilation of published and unpublished literature pertaining to surface water and groundwater in the vicinity of the Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek watersheds Compilation and evaluation of site-specific geologic data from resource-related coreholes in the South Quarry for planning of subsurface investigations Compilation and evaluation of available historical information regarding pumping rates, duration, and corresponding pit water elevation measurements for the active North Quarry Installation and monitoring of streamflow monitoring stations in Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek Sampling and chemical analysis of surface water samples from Permanente Creek, Monte Bello Creek, and North Quarry pit water Implementation of pit wall wash samples and chemical analyses of resulting data Drilling, logging and instrumentation of nine hydrogeologic exploratory boreholes in the South Quarry area Drilling, logging and instrumentation of two exploratory boreholes in the Main Slide area in the North Quarry
May 2010
063-7109
Drilling, logging and instrumentation of four exploratory boreholes in the south wall of the North Quarry to evaluate groundwater conditions between Permanente Creek and the North Quarry pit Installation of fourteen vibrating wire transducers and data loggers for long term measurement of water levels/pore pressure conditions Installation and development of four groundwater wells in the South Quarry for water level measurements and water quality sampling Air lift testing of completed coreholes to provide a preliminary estimate of sustained groundwater yield Downhole hydraulic injection tests (packer tests) of borehole intervals to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of various bedrock lithologies Installation of one deep pumping well and one monitoring well for a long-term pumping test to evaluate bulk hydraulic properties near the base of the proposed South Quarry Review and analysis of the geochemistry of representative overburden materials (provided by Geocon Consultants, Inc.) as it pertains to potential influences on surface and groundwater geochemistry Data analysis of hydraulic test results Data analysis of streamflow data and preparation of rating curves for Monte Bello and Permanente Creeks Development of a conceptual hydrogeological model and related MODFLOW groundwater numerical model using available site-specific geologic and hydrogeologic data to model existing conditions and to evaluate future mining and reclamation activities Compilation of current geochemistry data for surface water and groundwater Preparation of this hydrologic report summarizing the findings, conclusions and recommendations of our investigation
1.4
Project Team
The team for the Permanente Quarry hydrology project is comprised of geologists and engineers from Golders Sunnyvale, California and Redmond, Washington offices. The primary professionals associated with this project included: William L. Fowler, P.G., C.E.G. (California) Project Manager and Lead Engineering Geologist David Banton, P.G. (Licensed Geologist/Hydrogeologist, Washington) Principal-InCharge/Lead Hydrogeologist Stephen Thomas, P.G., C.HG. (California) Senior Hydrologist/Lead Groundwater Modeler Rens Verburg, Ph.D. Lead Geochemist Cheryl Ross (Licensed Hydrogeologist, Washington) Project Geochemist George Wegmann Project Hydrogeologist Derek Holom Staff Hydrogeologist The above individuals were supported by numerous staff geologists and engineers from several Golder offices for assistance with various office tasks (e.g., data compilation and analysis, cross sections, map preparations, etc.) and field tasks (e.g., stream monitoring and sampling, well sampling, drilling and well
May 2010
063-7109
installations, borehole logging, data collection, etc.) performed in support of the hydrologic characterization and evaluations.
May 2010
063-7109
2.0 2.1
REGIONAL SETTING Topography
The Quarry is situated in the foothills of the rugged, northwest-trending Santa Cruz Mountains segment of the California Coast Ranges (Figure 2.1). The Quarry is bisected by the east-flowing Permanente Creek. Historic mining has primarily occurred north of Permanente Creek, although historic exploration work has occurred across a large portion of the property including areas south of Permanente Creek. Topography in the area consists of moderately to steeply-sloped terrain with rounded ridges and drainages (Figure 2.2). Relief at the Quarry ranges from about 2,000 feet along the higher ridge crests to less than 500 feet amsl along the eastern portions of Permanente Creek. Average overall slope angles are typically around 25. The steepest natural slopes are on the order of 40 over smaller slope heights (100 to 200 feet) and generally correspond to limestone outcrops.
2.2
Geologic Setting
The majority of the Quarry addressed by this report is underlain by complexly deformed and faulted rocks of the Franciscan Assemblage (Figure 2.3). The eastern portion of the Quarry, including portions of the Plant and the EMSA, are underlain by Plio-Pleistocene rocks of the Santa Clara Formation. Overlying the bedrock are modern alluvial deposits associated with Permanente Creek (restricted to the eastern portion of the property), and relatively shallow surficial deposits comprised of soil and colluvium. Several large, ancient landslide deposits have been mapped by various investigators along the slopes flanking Permanente Creek. The geology of the area has been mapped in various levels of detail for published maps by the following: Rogers and Armstrong (1973) Sorg and McLaughlin (1975) Vanderhurst (1981) Brabb, Graymer, and Jones (2000) In addition, site-specific mapping at various scales, and utilizing both surface outcrop and subsurface drill core data, has also been completed by various geologists including: E. Mathieson (unpublished internal mapping,1982) J. Foruria (unpublished internal mapping, 2004) R. Fousek (unpublished internal mapping, 2009) Mine Reserves Associates (Surpac 3-D Model, 2007) TerraSource Software (Surpac 3-D Model, 2009) For the purposes of this report, all the available sources in addition to supplemental mapping by Golder have been utilized to create a compilation geologic map for the Quarry (Figure 2.4). Cross sections of the South Quarry derived from the TerraSource model are included as Figure 2.5. The following provides an
May 2010
063-7109
overview of the primary geologic units at the Quarry. More detailed descriptions of hydraulic properties of geologic units are presented in Section 4.
2.2.1
Franciscan Terrane
The following information regarding the Franciscan rocks as exposed in the North Quarry has been excerpted from Foruria (2004) who performed detailed geologic mapping for the Quarry. Cement-grade limestone and aggregate are extracted from the intricately folded and faulted limestones and metabasalts (greenstones) in the North Quarry. These rocks are part of the Permanente Terrane of the Jurassic-Cretaceous age Franciscan Assemblage. The Franciscan Assemblage represents a This limestonesubduction zone assemblage of highly deformed, variably metamorphosed, marine sedimentary rocks with oceanic crust-related submarine basalt (greenstone), chert, and limestone. southeast. All major stratigraphic horizons within the Franciscan rocks of the North Quarry are separated by lowangle faults forming a structurally imbricated thrust stack of layered and folded rock units (Figure 2.4). The Franciscan rocks are tectonically juxtaposed against an overlying section of undated, continentallyderived graywackes, shales, and argillites. The deformed thrust stack is a gently folded, northeasttrending, southeast dipping sequence in the eastern area of the North Quarry pit and transitions southwestward to a series of en-echelon, northwest-trending, southeast-plunging, anticlinal and synclinal folds in the western area of the North Quarry. High angle, brittle faults crosscut the Franciscan rocks, dissecting the rocks along prominent north-south and northwest-southeast orientations. A major throughgoing regional fault, the northwest strand of the Berrocal fault, crosses through the western end of the quarry. Figure 2.6 shows the major faults in the Quarry vicinity. A more detailed description of the geology within the South Quarry is presented in Section 4.2. metabasalt assemblage reaches a minimum total thickness of approximately 1,100 feet and dips to the
2.2.2
Santa Clara Formation
The Santa Clara Formation overlies a portion of the Franciscan Complex rocks in the north-central portion of the property (Figure 2.4). The Santa Clara Formation is a continental fluvial and alluvial deposit that is composed of unconsolidated to slightly consolidated conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and claystone (Vanderhurst, 1981). The age of the Santa Clara Formation ranges from late Tertiary to Pleistocene. Uplift of the Coast Ranges during this time resulted in increased erosion of the mountains and deposition of the Santa Clara Formation. The contact between the Franciscan rocks and Santa Clara Formation is considered to be unconformable, with the Santa Clara Formation deposited on an eroded Franciscan terrain (Rogers and Armstrong, 1973). Subsequent uplift of the nearby foothills along the Monte Vista fault, which lies along the margin of the valley floor to the east of the Quarry, has resulted in deformation of the Santa Clara Formation. In
May 2010
063-7109
addition, faulting within the uplifted geologic terrane between the Monte Vista and Berrocal faults has juxtaposed the Santa Clara formation in fault contact with older Franciscan rocks in the western portion of the EMSA (Figures 2.3 and 2.4). To the east of the unnamed fault, the deformed Santa Clara formation overlies the Franciscan with south-southwest trending dips of up to 50 degrees (Rogers and Armstrong, 1973). As mapped by Golder, a large erosional window east of the unnamed fault in the EMSA exposes greenstone, graywacke and limestone of the Franciscan Assemblage.
2.2.3
Surficial Deposits
2.2.3.1 Alluvium
This includes modern unconsolidated alluvial deposits along the active stream channel of Permanente Creek. These deposits are comprised of a poorly-sorted mixture of cobbles, gravels, sand, silt and clay. Deposits range from a few inches thick in the upper reaches of the watershed where erosion has cut the channel down into bedrock, to tens of feet thick where the channel widens and deepens as it approaches the flatter terrain of the Santa Clara Valley.
2.2.3.2 Colluvium
Colluvial deposits exist throughout the Quarry on natural slopes including areas underlying existing older overburden fills (i.e. WMSA), in areas of proposed overburden fills (i.e., CMSA, EMSA and Topsoil Storage Area), and in the proposed South Quarry area. The natural slopes in general are overlain with approximately one to two feet of soil and colluvial materials, which thickens to several feet to perhaps tens of feet thick in the larger natural swales in the region. Where colluvial materials were encountered in exploratory activities they were described as predominantly clayey sand with gravel to clayey gravel, with some gravelly clay. Gravel size was up to 3inches. In general, at the time of the investigations, the colluvium was dry and ranged from loose to very stiff or dense. During winter rainfall months, the colluvium likely becomes saturated from ephemeral runoff and infiltration.
2.2.3.3 Landslide Deposits

Several large, ancient landslides have been mapped by various investigators in various areas of the 3,510-acre Lehigh property, and throughout the broader foothills region. These landslides are generally described as possible old landslides, generally considered to be early Holocene or possibly latePleistocene features, and are identified on the basis of geomorphic features such as eroded scarps and irregular topography. Boundaries are generally subtle and poorly defined and there is no evidence of modern activity. Along the south flank of Permanente Creek, on the hillside east of the proposed South Quarry, two large landslides are identified by Sorg and McLaughlin (1975) while Rogers and Armstrong (1973) map only one of the landslide features. The possible presence of these landslides does not affect development of the South Quarry.
May 2010
063-7109
2.3
Structural Setting
The San Andreas Fault zone is located approximately two miles southwest of the quarry (Figure 2.6). The Sargent-Berrocal Fault Zone (SBFZ), part of the Santa Cruz Mountains front-range thrust fault system, parallels the San Andreas to the east and forms the eastern-most structural boundary to the Permanente Terrain. Near the North and South Quarry areas, the SBFZ consists of two northwest-trending, sub-parallel faults, namely the northeastern-most Monta Vista Fault Zone and the southwestern-most Berrocal Fault Zone (Sorg and McLaughlin, 1975) (Figure 2.6). The Monta Vista Fault Zone is located approximately one mile to the northeast of the North Quarry. A strand of the Berrocal Fault Zone lies beneath the adjacent cement plant area to the south of the EMSA, and extends west to other portions of the Quarry (Mathieson, 1982; Sorg and McLaughlin, 1975).
2.4
Hydrogeologic Setting
For the purposes of this hydrologic investigation, the Quarry lies entirely within the Franciscan Terrane. As described previously, the Franciscan Terrane is a highly-chaotic assemblage of rocks, or mlange, comprised primarily of altered meta-volcanic rocks (i.e., greenstone), graywacke and meta-graywacke units separated by zones of highly sheared matrix oftentimes comprised of mudstone or shale (Blake and Jones, 1981). In the area of the Quarry, the blocks in the matrix are primarily comprised of limestone (with chert interbeds) and graywacke which are floating in the highly sheared greenstone matrix. Most major structural boundaries in the Franciscan are fault boundaries as contrasted with depositional geologic contacts. Within major blocks, i.e., a limestone block, geologic contacts can be discerned. This structure makes for complex hydrogeologic conditions with numerous boundaries and variable flow paths. The occurrence of groundwater in the Franciscan is almost exclusively within secondary openings such as joints, fractures, shear zones and faults. In general, groundwater occurs under unconfined conditions; however, the structural complexity also locally creates perched and semi-confined conditions. The hydraulic properties of the Franciscan are highly variable. Most published values for hydraulic conductivity
-5 -6 of the Franciscan are in the range of 1 x 10 to 1 x 10 cm/sec. Well yields are typically low, in the range
of a few gallons per minute (gpm) to tens of gpm and are restricted to domestic use. Specific yields are very low on the order of less than 3% (DWR Bulletin, 1975).
May 2010
10
063-7109
3.0 3.1
3.1.1
DATA COLLECTION Hydrologic data

Precipitation
Precipitation data for the past ten years was compiled from the Los Altos Hills Station of the California Department of Water Resources California Data Exchange Center. The station is located approximately 3.3 miles from the Quarry at a comparable elevation of 2,001 feet amsl.
3.1.2
Stream Monitoring
As depicted on Figure 3.1 and noted on Table 3.1, Golder installed four monitoring stations, MS-1, MS-2, MS-3 and MS-4 in January 2009 in the two stream drainage areas present within the South Quarry boundaries. Two stations are located along Monte Bello Creek and two are located in Permanente Creek. The locations of the stations were selected after a site reconnaissance by Golder in December 2008.
TABLE 3.1 Stream Monitoring Station Summary

Site ID
MS-1 MS-2 MS-3 MS-4
Stream Location
Upstream Permanente Creek Downstream Permanente Creek Upstream Monte Bello Creek Downstream Monte Bello Creek
Station Elevation (ft amsl)

1,330 650 1,160 993
Watershed Area (acres)
662 1,707 419 688
Each monitoring station consists of a staff gauge and a stilling well equipped with a pressure transducer programmed to record stream height (or stage) at a frequency of every half hour. In addition, cross sectional velocity measurements were made at designated areas by the stilling wells to determine discharge of the creeks and establish a relationship between gage height and discharge rate.
3.2
3.2.1
Hydrogeologic Data
Well and Piezometer Installation
A total of 11 boreholes (HG-1 through HG-11) were drilled in 2008 and 2009 as part of the hydrogeologic investigation of the South Quarry as shown on Figure 3.1. The boreholes were drilled by using either direct or duel-tube air rotary methods. The boreholes ranged in depth from 94 to 600 feet below ground surface (bgs), or 970 to 1,628 feet amsl. Five of the boreholes were completed as two-inch diameter
May 2010
11
063-7109
monitoring wells. Borehole HG-11 was completed as a six-inch diameter monitoring well. Vibrating wire transducers (VWT) were installed in the remaining boreholes except for boring HG-1, which could not be instrumented because of borehole instability. Borehole HG-1 was abandoned by filling with grout. The VWT installations involved attaching the VWTs and their cables to a string of PVC pipe as it was inserted into the borehole; and then fully-grouting the hole, using the PVC string as a tremie pipe. The boring completion details are summarized in Table 3.2 and shown graphically in Appendix A. Additionally, Golder installed four VWTs in boreholes GT2-7, GT4-25, GT1-4, and GEO3-34, which were previously completed as part of the geologic/geotechnical investigation of the South Quarry area.
TABLE 3.2 Borehole Completion Summary

Boring ID
GT1-4 GT2-7 GT3-4 GT4-25a HG-1a HG-2 HG-3 HG-4 HG-5 HG-6 HG-7 HG-8 HG-9 HG-10s HG-10int HG-10d HG-11
Total Depth (bgs)

268 477 513 392 590 560 460 300 400 400 300 200 200 580 580 580 600
Ground Elevation (ft amsl)

1,119 1,281 1,739 1,671 1,585 1,613 1,548 1,857 1,615 1,822 1,254 1,148 1245 1,585 1,585 1,585 1,585
Completion Type
VWT VWT VWT VWT -VWT VWT 2" MW VWT 2" MW 2" MW VWT 2" MW 2" MW VWT VWT 6" MW
Screen Depth or Interval (ft amsl)

951 1,010 1,469 1,394 -1,256 1,178 1,562-1,582 1,377 1,549-1,569 116-136 1,002 1,136-1,156 1,431-1,451 1,290 1,090 985-1,085
Lithology at Screen Location

Greenstone Limestone/Graywacke Limestone Limestone -Limestone/Graywacke Limestone/Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone/Graywacke Greenstone Weathered Graywacke Limestone Limestone Limestone Limestone
3.2.2
Airlift Testing
Airlift testing was usually performed after each borehole was completed as part of the development process, and to provide a preliminary estimate of well yield. The airlift test consisted of using compressed air from the air rotary rig to lift groundwater to the surface with an estimate of sustained flow over a period of 15 to 30 minutes.
May 2010
12
063-7109
3.2.3
Packer Tests
In November 2008, Golder completed a series of packer tests in several boreholes to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of the rock units. Fourteen (14) tests were completed in boreholes HG-2, HG-3, HG-4, HG-5, HG-8, and HG-9. Tests were conducted in boreholes HG-6 and HG-7; however, the tests could not be analyzed due to packer failure (poor borehole conditions prevented an adequate packer seal) or downhole transducer failure. Packer tests were not completed at HG-1 due to borehole instability. The packer tests consisted of a water level stabilization period after packer inflation followed by a constant rate injection test and a recovery phase. The results of the packer tests are discussed in Section 4.4.
3.2.4
Pumping Tests
In September 2009, a step-rate pumping test was conducted in borehole HG-10S followed by a 72-hour constant-rate pumping test (Figure 3.1). The pumping rate for the constant-rate test was chosen based on the results of the step-rate pumping test. The constant-rate pumping test in HG-10S began on September 28, 2009 at 9:00 AM and continued until October 1, 2009 at 9:01 AM. Borehole HG-10S was pumped at an average rate of 48 gallons per minute (gpm) for three days. The pumping rate was determined from the totalized discharge readings using an in-line flow meter. Groundwater levels were recorded in the monitoring wells using submerged INW PT2X pressure transducer dataloggers as well as manual depth to water level measurements. The water levels at monitoring points GT4-25, GT3-4, HG-2, HG-10INT, and HG-10D were recorded using grouted-in GeoSlope VWTs. Figure 3.1 depicts the monitoring locations.The results of the pumping tests are discussed in Section 4.4.
3.2.5
Groundwater Level Monitoring
Groundwater levels were measured throughout 2009 to establish current groundwater elevations and record changes in potentiometric surface over time. Water levels were measured with pressure transducer dataloggers and electric water level tapes in the monitoring wells and with Geo-Slope Miniloggers or VWT Recorders for the VWTs.
3.3
Geochemical Data
To characterize groundwater and surface water quality within the vicinity of the proposed South Quarry, sampling of surface water, groundwater, and wall washing sampling was conducted. Groundwater and surface water monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3.1. parameter list. Results are discussed in Section 6. Table 3.3 summarizes the analytical
May 2010
13
063-7109
TABLE 3.3 Analytical Parameter Summary

Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling 1st Round February 2009
x x
Parameter
VOCs Metals (total and dissolved) Additional Metals Vanadium Boron Low Level Mercury Hexavalent Chromium
1
2nd Round April 2009

x x
3rd Round October 2009
4th Round January 2010
Wall Washing November 2009
North Quarry January 2010
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x
x x x
x x x x
General Chemistry Oil and Grease SVOCs Pesticides PCBs Dioxin Asbestos
Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity ( 96-hr (% survival)) Cyanide 1) 2) 3)
Metals = aluminium, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, boron, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, zinc General chemistry = calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, Silicon as SO2, bicarbonate, carbonate, alkalinity, chloride, fluoride, sulfate, hardness, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, residual chlorine, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, phosphorous, sulfide, odor, turbidity, pH, electrical conductivity Select general chemistry parameters analyzed due to limited sample volume
3.3.1
Groundwater Quality Sampling
Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the monitoring wells were developed to remove residual drilling fluid and to ensure proper hydraulic connection to the surrounding aquifer. Monitoring well HG-4 produced little water during development and subsequent sampling events. A total of four rounds of samples were collected from monitoring wells HG-4, -6, -7, and -9 over the past year in accordance with Golders standard operating procedures (SOPs). The wells were sampled at different times of the year to account for potential seasonal variations in water quality and water levels. In addition, a groundwater sample was collected from the discharge of the pump test from well HG-10s during the 72-hour pump test in September. HG-10s was also sampled as part of the fourth round of groundwater sampling.
May 2010
14
063-7109
For the first round sampling event, each monitoring well was purged of at least three well casing volumes, except for well HG-4 which was purged less because of limited recharge. After the first round, Golder collected the groundwater samples using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) low-flow recommended procedure. Field parameters were recorded with an YSI 556 water-quality meter and a LaMotte turbidity meter and included temperature, electrical conductivity, pH, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential, and turbidity. Field instruments were calibrated daily before starting sampling. Samples for dissolved metals analysis were either filtered (0.45 m filter) in the field or upon receipt by the laboratory. All samples, including field quality control samples, were labeled and packed with ice in a cooler at a temperature of 4 C or lower and sent to a California-certified laboratory for analysis.
3.3.2
Surface Water Quality Sampling
Surface water samples, SW-1, SW-2, and SW-3, were collected from three locations as shown on Figure 3-1. Sample locations SW-1 and SW-2 are from upstream and downstream Permanente Creek, respectively. Sample location SW-3 is from Monte Bello Creek. Four rounds of samples were collected throughout the year to establish current water quality conditions, and account for seasonal variations in flow and quality. Samples of the North Quarry sump, and runoff from the North Quarry western haul road were collected in January 2010 as well. The samples were collected in accordance with Golders SOPs. In addition, the EPA recommended clean hands/dirty hands sampling protocol was followed for the collection of the sample to be analyzed by EPA method 1631 (low level mercury). Field parameters (as described above) were recorded with an YSI 556 water-quality meter and a LaMotte turbidity meter. Samples for dissolved metals analysis were either filtered (0.45 m filter) in the field or upon receipt by the laboratory All samples, including field quality control samples, were labeled and packed with ice in a cooler at a temperature of 4 C or lower and sent for laboratory analysis.
3.3.3
Wall Washing and North Quarry Sampling
To evaluate metal leaching potential under field scale conditions, wall washing was performed on exposed faces within the North Quarry in November 2009. A total of six samples were collected following the standard procedure outlined in Draft Guidelines and Recommended Methods for the Prediction of Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage at Mine Sites in British Columbia (Price, 1997) from different rock types and/or different exposure times. The test involved washing an approximately one-meter square area of rock face with a known volume of water. The wall washing rinsate was collected and submitted for chemical analysis. Samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. Samples for dissolved metals analysis were filtered (0.45 m filter) upon receipt by the laboratory. Field parameters were recorded with an YSI 556 water-quality meter and a LaMotte turbidity meter.
May 2010
15
063-7109
3.3.4
Quality Control
As part of the sampling program, Golder collected field quality control (QC) samples. One duplicate sample was collected per sampling event to verify the precision of laboratory analysis and field sampling procedures. If VOCs were being analyzed, trip blanks provided by the laboratory were submitted for VOC analysis to determine whether samples may have been compromised as a result of sample container handling or transport. Equipment blanks were collected on any non-dedicated equipment used during sampling to ensure decontamination procedures were adequate. Field blanks were collected to ensure that ambient air was not influencing the samples. All equipment and field blanks were prepared with laboratory-supplied deionized water.
May 2010
16
063-7109
4.0 4.1
4.1.1
CURRENT HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Site Setting

Climate
The regional climate is Mediterranean with the majority of precipitation occurring between November and April. Average annual precipitation is about 22 inches, consistent with the intermediate altitudes of the Santa Clara Valley, and more than 50 inches in the surrounding mountains (Hanson, 2004). The climate is also yearly variable with dryer and wetter seasons from year to year. Recently, there was significantly less precipitation in 2007 and 2008 compared to the preceding and subsequent years. Section 4.6 discusses precipitation and storm water runoff in further detail.
4.1.2
Surface Water Flow
Two separate stream drainages are present within the project area, which include Permanente Creek to the north and Monte Bello Creek to the south. The drainages are divided by a northwest-southeast trending ridge with approximately 75% of the drainage of proposed South Quarry is to Permanente Creek and 25% to Monte Bello Creek. Current elevations range from 1,990 feet amsl along the ridge in the southwest corner of the South Quarry to 1,110 feet amsl in the northeast corner near Permanente Creek. Average overall slope angles are typically around 25 degrees with steeper slopes over limited sections. Monte Bello Creek is located south of the proposed South Quarry and is entrenched mainly in greenstone. Monitoring station MS-3 is located at elevation 1,160 ft and is just downstream of the North Fork of Monte Bello Creek, which is dry under baseflow conditions (Figure 3.1). Monitoring station MS-4 is located at elevation 993 feet amsl and downstream of the proposed South Quarry. Permanente Creek is situated between the existing North Quarry and proposed South Quarry and is mainly entrenched in limestone. Monitoring station MS-1 is located at elevation 1,330 feet amsl and upstream of the proposed South Quarry and existing North Quarry (Figure 3.1). Monitoring station MS-2 is located at elevation 650 ft amsl and downstream of the proposed South Quarry and existing North Quarry. MS-2 is also located downstream of the North Quarry dewatering discharge point. Permanente Creek is generally dry adjacent to the North Quarry during the dry season and flows typically year-round both upstream of and downstream from the North Quarry.
May 2010
17
063-7109
4.1.3
Seeps and Springs
Seepage in the existing North Quarry has been observed along the Main (1987) Failure headscarp between elevations 1,400 and 1,600 feet and from the reclaimed slope between the Main (1987) Failure and the West Materials Storage Area, above elevation 1,350 feet, during field mapping in June 2007. Golder observed an additional seep at approximately elevation 1,050 feet along the southwest portion of the existing North Quarry pit wall.
4.1.4
Geologic Units
The major lithologic units that occur in the South Quarry area include limestone, greenstone, graywacke, fault breccia, and metabasalt. These are described briefly as follows: Metabasalt is medium to dark gray and fine-grained, and commonly contains abundant milky calcite veins and scattered pyrite crystals. Vesicles are present locally and occasionally filled with calcite. Chlorite content is variable but generally low. Greenstone developed from the same parent lithologies as metabasalt but has higher chlorite content. It is greenish-gray and contains scattered pyrite crystals and opaque minerals. Vesicles, calcite-filled vesicles, and milky calcite veins occur locally. Graywacke ranges from yellowish brown to black, and is generally very fine grained to fine grained, although local conglomeratic intervals exist. Slickensides are common, and may be coated with graphite. Scattered milky calcite veins and pyrite occur locally. Limestone is light gray to medium dark gray, and fine to medium grained. Stylolites (contacts marked by irregular interlocking penetrations of the two sides) are common, and black chert nodules are usually present in concentrations of 15% or less. The limestone is locally dolomitic. Fault breccia is dark gray to black and may be clast- or matrix-supported. The matrix consists of soft, very fine fault gouge. Clasts are limestone, greenstone, graywacke, or metabasalt, or some combination thereof. This unit may be highly sheared and deformed, and well-developed slickensides are common. Milky calcite veins and scattered pyrite occur locally. The occurrence of these rock types is complex and consistent with a mlange sequence.
4.1.5
Geologic Structure
As noted in Section 2.2.1 and similar to the North Quarry, the rocks appear to occur as an imbricate thrust stack of layered, folded and faulted limestones, greenstones, and metabasalts. Contacts between these units are typically thrust faults (Figure 2.5). This thrust stack is tectonically overlain by continentallyderived graywacke. Two major structures within the South Quarry area consist of a segment of the Northwest Berrocal Fault Strand that strikes west-northwest, just north of Permanente Creek, through the south wall of the North Quarry and a west-northwest offset of the Northwest Berrocal Fault Strand further to the south, which is located along the southern South Quarry boundary and separates the limestone unit from the footwall greenstone/breccia unit. Other large scale structures across the South Quarry area include a series of steeply-dipping faults striking to the north-northeast (Figure 2.5).
May 2010
18
063-7109
A geological model developed by TerraSource for the Quarry grouped the five general rock types in South Quarry coreholes into the following three groups: Hanging Wall Graywacke (includes Greenstone and Conglomerate) Footwall Fault Breccia (predominately Greenstone) Limestone (all grades) Lehigh geological logging indicates the breakdown of rock types within the model rock masses listed in Table 4.1.
TABLE 4.1 Distribution of Rock Types within Geologic Model Rock Masses
Lithology Footwall Fault Breccia (Greenstone) Footage
Metabasalt Fault Breccia Graywacke Limestone Greenstone 14 1,188 24 318 1,364
Hanging Wall Graywacke
Limestone
% of Total
0.5% 40.5% 1% 11% 47%
Footage
11 572 472 25 183
% of Total
1% 45% 37% 2% 15%
Footage
0 66 56 2,927 69
% of Total
0% 2% 2% 94% 2%
The dominant thrust contact in the TerraSource model is the hanging wall contact of the footwall fault breccia (greenstone). The model indicates an overall dip to the northeast for this contact, with sections that dip about 20 in the north and south parts of the South Quarry, separated by a steeper section. From the steeper section toward the north, limestone overlies the footwall fault breccia (greenstone).
4.2
Hydrogeologic Units
The occurrence of groundwater is almost exclusively within secondary openings such as joints, fractures, shear zones and faults within the bedrock. The three main hydrogeologic units in the bedrock within the proposed South Quarry area are grouped into limestone, greenstone, and graywacke units.
4.2.1
Limestone
Three different grades of limestone are differentiated within the limestone unit. As noted on Figure 2.5, limestone occurs in blocks that range in thickness from less than 50 feet along the western portion to
May 2010
19
063-7109
approximately 600 feet at the center of the proposed South Quarry. Generally, the limestone unit dips gently (approximately 20 degrees) to the northeast and extends under Permanente Creek to the north where it appears continuous with limestone exposed in the south wall of the North Quarry. To the south, the limestone unit is truncated by the greenstone footwall unit, which is likely an offset of the Northwest Berrocal Fault Strand and is the dominant thrust contact identified in the TerraSource Model. The limestone is moderately fractured with a moderate permeability. Several north-northeast striking thrust faults are present throughout the limestone unit (Figure 2.5). The faults may act as boundaries which will cause the limestone unit to behave as separate, compartmentalized units. discusses the hydraulic properties in more detail. Section 4.4
4.2.2
Greenstone
The second major hydrogeologic unit at the Quarry is greenstone, including metabasalt. Based on the geological coreholes (Table 4.1), fault breccia comprises up to 40% of the greenstone unit. The fault breccia usually is highly sheered and deformed with a matrix of soft and very fine fault gouge. As noted previously, the greenstone is likely the footwall of the main thrust fault structure and is predominately present along the southern portion of the proposed South Quarry and extends south to and under Monte Bello Creek. Greenstone also underlies the limestone unit located within the proposed South Quarry and intermittently between the limestone blocks. The greenstone is highly weathered in areas and has a lower permeability compared to the limestone. Section 4.4 discusses the hydraulic properties in more detail.
4.2.3
Graywacke
Graywacke is predominately present along the eastern portion of the proposed South Quarry as part of the hanging wall associated with the Northwest Berrocal Fault Strand. Based on the geological coreholes (Table 4.1), fault breccia and greenstone comprise 60% of the graywacke unit. The graywacke is highly weathered in areas and has similar hydrogeologic properties as the greenstone unit.
4.3
Water Level Response

Groundwater levels and precipitation for the individual
Figure 4.1 is a hydrograph showing groundwater elevations in monitoring wells and piezometers from early September through October 2009. monitoring locations are included in Appendix B. Precipitation is plotted against the secondary y-axis and represents cumulative precipitation from October 1, 2008 through the end of October 2009. Precipitation data were obtained from the Los Altos Hills climate station (ID: LSA), available from the California Department of Water Resources Data Exchange Center (http://cdec.water.ca.gov/). The Los Altos Hills climate station is located approximately 3.3 miles northwest of the North Quarry at an elevation of 2,001 ft amsl.
May 2010
20
063-7109
A significant rainstorm event occurred between October 12, 2009 and October 14, 2009, 11 days after the pumping test ended (discussed in Section 4.4.2). A total of 4.2 inches of precipitation occurred during this 36-hour period, Table 4.2 summarizes the groundwater level responses from the rainstorm event.
TABLE 4.2 Summary of Groundwater Level Responses (October 2009 Rainstorm Event)
Well ID Lithology Completion Depth (feet bgs) 270 277 Peak Groundwater Level Rise (feet) 0.53 0.69 Elapsed Time After Beginning of Storm When Response First Observed (hours) 7.0 11.0
GT3-4 GT4-25A
Limestone Limestone
The peak groundwater level responses to the rainstorm event in these two wells occurred on October 12th. No measurable response was observed in HG-10INT or HG-10D, which are wells completed in limestone at a depth of 295 and 495 feet bgs, respectively. Response to this storm in the remaining monitoring wells (HG-4, HG-6, HG-7, HG-9, and HG-10S) cannot be verified because they were not continuously monitored during the rainstorm event. The water level responses in the two piezometers in the limestone indicate that groundwater recharge occurred as a result of the rainstorm. Assuming a storativity ranging from 3 x 10-3 to 1 x 10-2 (Section 4.4.2.4), the recharge from the rainstorm is approximately 0.02 to 0.08 inches. Relative groundwater changes recorded in the monitoring wells and vibrating-wire piezometers are plotted on Figure 4.2. The significant water level change in GT3-4 and GT4-25A between late September and early October was due to the constant-rate pumping test conducted in HG-10S on September 30 through October 1, 2009. The relative natural (antecedent) groundwater changes (i.e. seasonal groundwater level decline) before and after the pumping test are notably different for monitoring wells/piezometers completed in limestone versus graywacke and greenstone. The average rate of water level decline in the wells/piezometers completed in graywacke or greenstone (HG-4, HG-6, HG-7, and HG-9) was 0.006 feet per day, whereas the average water level decline in wells/piezometers completed in limestone or dolomitic limestone (HG-10S, GT3-4, and GT4-25A) was 0.08 feet per day. This suggests a higher diffusivity (that is, transmissivity divided by storativity) for the limestone units compared to the graywacke and greenstone. The individual hydrographs included in Appendix B show an overall water level decline. The limestone monitoring wells show a net decrease in water levels of 25 feet during the 2009 water year (OctoberSeptember), with a total decline of 40 feet from late March 2008 through October 2009. The general trend in declining water levels is likely due to the drier than average years in 2007 and 2008. Furthermore, the December 2008 Water Condition Report by the Santa Clara Valley Water District
May 2010
21
063-7109
reported that groundwater elevations were about 17 feet lower on average than the five year average from 2004 through 2008 (SCVWD, 2008).
4.4
Hydraulic Properties
The hydraulic properties of the hydrogeologic units at the Quarry were estimated from the packer tests conducted in several boreholes and from a constant-rate pumping test conducted in HG-10S. Tables 4.3 and 4.4 summarize the hydraulic properties estimated from the packer tests and constant-rate pumping test, respectively.
4.4.1
Packer Test Results
Table 4.3 is a summary of the hydraulic properties from the packer testing. Packer tests were carried out in the more fractured sections of the boreholes. The data collected for the packer testing is included in Appendix C. The hydrogeologic units tested included the greenstone, limestone, and graywacke. The estimated hydraulic conductivity of the greenstone ranges from 0.11 to 3.26 ft/d with a geometric mean of 0.41 ft/d. The estimated hydraulic conductivity of the limestone ranges from 0.06 to 6.30 ft/d, with a geometric mean of 0.60 ft/d. Two zones of graywacke were tested, resulting in hydraulic conductivities of 2.51 and 29.8 ft/d (weathered graywacke), with a mean of 8.64 ft/d. Overall, the hydraulic conductivities estimated for the greenstone from the packer tests are biased towards the high-end for the entire unit because the zones tested in each borehole tended to be the more fractured (and therefore, more permeable) zones. Therefore, the overall bulk hydraulic conductivity of the greenstone (fractured and unfractured sections) is expected to be lower than those indicated by these localized tests. The hydraulic conductivity of the limestone estimated from the packer testing are considered to be biased toward the low-end of the bulk hydraulic conductivity, because the more competent zones were tested due to a poor seal in the more fractured and permeable zones.
4.4.2
Constant-Rate Pumping Test
Figure 4.3 is a semi-log plot of the corrected drawdown and recovery observed in the pumping well (HG10S) during the constant-rate pumping test. Drawdown data were corrected (and plotted as corrected drawdown) taking into account the antecedent groundwater level decline, which was observed in all monitored wells/piezometers. The total drawdown in the pumping well at the end of the test was about 32 feet. Drawdown for the first 5 minutes of pumping was affected by well casing storage. The data between 5 and 200 minutes of pumping appears to be more representative of the aquifer, because the rate of drawdown stabilized (i.e. plots as a straight-line on semi-log chart). After 200 minutes, the rate of drawdown increased. The increasing rate of drawdown is interpreted to be the result of the cone of depression encountering a boundary between the limestone and lower permeability greenstone and graywacke.
May 2010
22
063-7109
4.4.2.1 Pumped Well Response and Interpretation

Figure 4.4 is a plot of the derivative of drawdown and recovery in the pumped well. The purpose of the derivative drawdown plot was to confirm the responses identified from the semi-log plot in Figure 4.3 and to identify any other conditions affecting the drawdown. The derivative drawdown plot validates the assertion that the response of the pumping test in the first 5 minutes of pumping was affected by storage in the well casing. From 5 to 200 minutes, the derivative of drawdown indicates that the response to pumping is affected by partial penetration, which has a negative half-slope. conditions. The water levels recovered after pumping stopped. After 6.5 days of recovery, the water level in the pumped well had recovered to within 2.5 feet of the pre-test water level. The incomplete recovery indicates that the tested limestone unit is of limited extent and receives limited recharge. In effect, the well resulted in a partial dewatering of the limestone unit of 2.5 feet after three days of pumping. After 200 minutes, the drawdown derivative sharply increases, indicating the flow is dominated by lower-permeability boundary
4.4.2.2 Observation Well Responses and Interpretation

Figure 4.5 presents semi-log plots of the drawdown observed in wells HG-10INT, GT4-25A, and GT3-4 that are all completed in the same limestone unit as test well HG-10S. The total drawdown response to pumping in the closest well (HG-10INT, located 7 feet from HG-10S) was 10.5 feet at the end of the test. HG-10INT is a vibrating wire piezometer completed in limestone at a depth of 295 feet bgs, which is almost 150 feet lower in elevation than HG-10S (see Table 3.2). GT4-25A (625 feet southeast of HG10S) and GT3-4 (850 feet west of HG-10S) are completed at similar elevations as HG-10S and had maximum drawdown during the test of 2.82 feet and 1.61 feet, respectively.
4.4.2.3 Analysis Results and Interpretation

Table 4.4 summarizes the interpreted hydraulic properties based on the results of the constant-rate pumping test. The drawdown and recovery data collected in the pumping well were first analyzed using the Cooper-Jacob (1946) straight-line method (Figure 4.3). The transmissivity (T) was estimated from the drawdown and recovery data to be 2,400 and 2,600 ft2/d, respectively. However, the derivative plot (see Figure 4.4) indicates that the drawdown was affected by partial penetration effects and no-flow boundary conditions that are not accounted for using the Cooper-Jacob method Therefore, the pumping test data were analyzed using the Theis unconfined partial penetration solution (Theis, 1935) with no-flow boundary conditions (Figures 4.6 and 4.7). The type curves for each observation well are plotted as solid red lines, where the position and shape of the type curves are based on hydraulic properties (transmissivity and storativity), the radial distance from the pumping well to each observation well, and the distances to the inferred boundary conditions. An iterative process was employed with the best fit obtained using four no-flow boundaries (at distances of 100 to 2,000 feet) to represent a block of limestone bounded by either faults or lithologic changes.
May 2010
23
063-7109
Based on the two analyses presented on Figures 4.6 and 4.7, the results indicate the limestone is of limited extent (i.e. analogous to a compartmentalized hydrogeologic system) with a transmissivity of 2,224 ft2/d, and an estimated storativity (S) of 2.610-3 to 9.310-3. For both analyses, the limestone block was assumed to be elongated in the northwest southeast direction (parallel to the main structural fabric). The Theis type curve match for GT3-4 (Figure 4.7) resulted in a higher estimate of storativity and more distant interpreted boundary conditions, but smaller in size than the compartment estimated for GT4-25A (about 60% smaller). No unique combination of hydraulic properties coupled with compartment geometry was found to match the Theis type curve to all three observation points, indicating a degree of heterogeneity in the hydraulic system within the limestone compartment. Figure 4.8 is a distance versus drawdown plot of the observed drawdown in HG-10INT, GT4-25A, and GT3-4 after 12 hours of pumping (i.e. before drawdown in these wells was affected by the lateral boundaries). Ideally, the drawdowns observed at various distances should plot on a straight-line if the observation wells are completed in the same hydraulic system as the pumped well.
2
The distance
drawdown plot presented in Figure 4.8 is based on a transmissivity of 2,224 ft /d and a range of storativity values from 110-4 to 110-3. The results of the distance versus drawdown plot show that the observed drawdown in GT4-25A and GT3-4 after 12 hours of pumping are consistent with the predicted drawdown using the estimated storativity from the Theis partial penetration solution (Figure 4.6 and Figure 4.7). The estimated storativity at HG-10INT (Table 4.4 and Figure 4.5) is 0.9. This value is not representative of the storativity of the limestone aquifer which would be expected to be in the range of 0.0001 to 0.001. The high storativity value appears to be related to the analysis method (Cooper Jacob, 1946) which assumes that the pumping well and the observation well are fully screened within the limestone when in fact the well partially penetrates the limestone and the observation well HG-10INT is screened in the lower part of the limestone aquifer. Figure 4.8 shows that both horizontal and vertical hydraulic connections exist between the shallow and intermediate depths within the limestone. Observation well HG-10INT responded to the pumping of the well within a drawdown range predicted by the overall hydraulic properties (transmissivity and storativity) estimated for the limestone unit. The predicted drawdown in pumping well HG-10S after 12 hours ranges from 5.23 to 6.25 feet based on
-4 -3 different storativity values of 110 to 110 (Figure 4.8); the actual observed drawdown in the pumping
well was 26.03 feet.
Therefore, the total well losses in the pumping well after 12 hours were
approximately 19.8 to 20.8 feet. Well losses are primarily caused by turbulent flow inside or immediately adjacent to the well screen. Well losses are also greater in partially penetrating than in fully penetrating wells because pumping induces vertical flow from below the screened or open interval in the well.
May 2010
24
063-7109
4.5
4.5.1
Groundwater Flow Conditions

Groundwater Levels and Flow
The elevations represent conditions measured in
Figure 4.9 presents the recorded groundwater elevations and interpreted groundwater level contours and flow directions near the proposed South Quarry. October 2009. The highest groundwater elevations were observed in HG-4 and HG-6 which are located on the northwest-southeast trending ridge that separates the Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek watersheds. In October 2009, the groundwater elevations at HG-4 and HG-6 were approximately 1,752 and 1,658 ft amsl, respectively. The lowest groundwater elevations at that time were observed in HG-8 and GT1-4 (both located near Permanente Creek), with elevations ranging from 1,038 to 1,066 ft amsl, respectively. These elevations are 90 and 50 feet higher than the nearby creek elevations, respectively. The regional-scale direction of groundwater flow is interpreted to be from west to east, flowing from the topographic high at Black Mountain toward the Santa Clara Valley. Locally, groundwater discharges to Permanente Creek, Monte Bello Creek and an unnamed creek in the eastern half of the Quarry. Groundwater also discharges to the North Quarry. Figure 4.10 shows the recent pit water level in the North Quarry, ranging between 738 and 776 ft amsl, which is between 300 and 400 feet lower than Permanente Creek. Groundwater flow through the limestone and graywacke/greenstone locally is primarily to the north and northeast from a groundwater divide located beneath the ridge separating Permanente Creek from Monte Bello Creek. Based on the pumping test evaluation, groundwater flow is preferentially within the more permeable limestone units. However because the limestone units are of limited extent (truncated by greenstone and graywacke), the overall groundwater flow system is controlled by the lower permeability of the greenstone/graywacke units.
4.5.2
Hydraulic Gradients
Figure 4.11 shows the groundwater elevation versus well completion elevation for observation wells completed in the limestone and greenstone/graywacke units. The groundwater levels in HG-10 (i.e. HG10S, HG-10INT, and HG-10D) show a steep downward vertical component of hydraulic gradient among the shallow, intermediate, and deep monitoring wells/piezometers. The vertical hydraulic gradient is the difference in water level (head) versus the difference in elevation of the two monitoring wells/piezometers. A negative vertical component of hydraulic gradient indicates an area of discharge, or upward groundwater flow; whereas a positive vertical component of hydraulic gradient indicates an area of recharge, or downward groundwater flow. The vertical component of hydraulic gradient between HG-10S and HG-10INT is about 0.45, indicating downward groundwater flow. The vertical component of hydraulic gradient between HG-10INT and HG-10D is about 1.6, indicating that the shallow and intermediate depth wells and piezometers are completed in a shallow aquifer which is hydraulically separated (perched) from a deeper aquifer.
May 2010
25
063-7109
The horizontal component of the hydraulic gradient ranges from 0.25 to 0.77, where the steeper hydraulic gradients are near the groundwater divide separating Monte Bello Creek from Permanente Creek. The horizontal component of the hydraulic gradient in the greenstone is steeper than the gradient observed in the limestone because the greenstone has lower hydraulic conductivity (Figure 4.11).
4.6
4.6.1
Water Balance
Approach
Water balances were developed for WY 2009 for the existing North Quarry, and Permanente and Monte Bello Creeks using a combination of field monitoring data and data obtained from public records. As well as forming part of the hydrogeologic conceptual model, these water balances were developed to act as inputs and calibration data for the numerical groundwater flow model in order to predict the future inflows to the North and proposed South Quarry and the impacts to the streamflows in Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek. Pit water elevations in the North Quarry were measured daily over a period from early-February 2009 to mid-October 2009. The total volume of water in the pit was calculated by the sum of the water level elevation multiplied by the surface area of the pit water on ten-foot increments, to account for the change in volume versus height. Pumping was recorded daily and was based on the total amount of time the pump was operated at full capacity (1,150 gpm). Therefore, the total daily amount of water pumped from the North Quarry was determined by the pumping rate multiplied by the operating duration. Streamflow data for Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek were collected from four stations, two on each stream. The stations are identified as MS-1 through MS-4, where MS-1 and MS-2 are the upstream and downstream gauges on Permanente Creek, respectively, and MS-3 and MS-4 are the upstream and downstream gauges on Monte Bello Creek, respectively. Each station had a pressure transducer and datalogger installed to measure the change in water depth in the stream. The water level, or pressure, was then converted to streamflow based on a rating-curve developed from a series of manual flow measurements collected throughout the season.
4.6.2
Hydrologic Data
4.6.2.1 Precipitation
The closest precipitation station to the Quarry is Los Altos Hills, located approximately 3.3 miles northwest of the North Quarry at an elevation of 2,001 ft amsl. Table 4.5 is a summary of the monthly average rainfall at the Los Altos station from 1999 through 2009 (water years1). The annual average rainfall over this period of time was 22.2 inches. For Water Year (WY) 2009, the precipitation was 21.9 inches. The annual variability for this station is relatively low, with minimum and maximum of 17.4 and 26.4 inches. Although the Los Altos station is not physically located within the Permanente and Monte
1
A water year is from October 1 through September 30.
May 2010
26
063-7109
Bello watershed, the data can be considered reasonably representative for the purpose of this water budget. Within the basins, higher elevation areas would be expected to receive more precipitation than lower-lying areas.
4.6.2.2 Permanente Creek Flow

Figures 4.12 and 4.13 are hydrographs of the streamflow in MS-1 and MS-2, respectively, from February to October 2009. MS-1 is the upstream gauge and has a drainage area of 662 acres, and MS-2 is the downstream gauge and has a total drainage area of 1,706 acres. Therefore, the watershed area for the reach between the two gauges is 1,045 acres. From February to July, the streamflow at MS-1 ranged from approximately 30 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the wet part of the season (February and March) to less than 0.1 cfs from July to October. At MS-2, the streamflow ranged from 13 cfs in February to about 2 cfs in July. The streamflow observed from mid-March to July are mostly affected by pumping from the North Quarry into Permanente Creek. The large spike and subsequent elevated streamflows observed from March 18, 2009 correlates to pumping at the North Quarry, where the average pumping rate from March to July was 2 cfs. Figures 4.12 and 4.13 also show the baseflow estimates separated from the streamflow observed in Permanente Creek at MS-1 and MS-2. Based on these hydrographs, the average annual baseflow for WY 2009 at MS-1 and MS-2 was estimated to be 0.30 cfs and 1.02 cfs, respectively. The average annual baseflow contribution to Permanente Creek between the two stations (representing a catchment area of 1,045 acres) was 0.73 cfs. Therefore, the total annual groundwater discharge to these reaches of Permanente Creek is 215 and 740 acre-feet.
4.6.2.3 Monte Bello Creek Flow

Figures 4.14 and 4.15 are hydrographs of the streamflow in MS-3 and MS-4, respectively, from February to October 2009. MS-3 is the upstream gauge and has a drainage area of 419 acres, and MS-4 is the downstream gauge with a total drainage area of 688 acres. Therefore, the watershed area for the reach between the two stream gauges is 269 acres. From February to July, the streamflow at MS-3 and MS-4 ranged from over 100 cfs to approximately 0.1 cfs. The high streamflows were observed in early February and March, after the area received over 15 inches of rainfall. Figures 4.14 and 4.15 also show the baseflow estimates separated from the streamflow observed in Monte Bello Creek at MS-3 and MS-4. Based on these hydrographs, the average annual baseflow for WY 2009 at MS-3 and MS-4 was estimated to be 0.08 cfs and 0.14 cfs, respectively. The average annual baseflow to Monte Bello Creek between the two stations (representing a watershed area of 269 acres) was 0.06 cfs. Therefore, the total annual groundwater discharge to these reaches of Monte Bello Creek is 61.5 and 104 acre-feet.
May 2010
27
063-7109
4.6.2.4 North Quarry Pumping

Figure 4.16 is a plot of the water level elevation in the North Quarry with the total daily precipitation measured at the Los Altos Hills climate station. Surface water runoff to the North Quarry occurs from precipitation within the watershed of the pit and varies with storm intensity. For intense storm events, runoff from precipitation will be greater, because there is less recharge and evaporation. From mid-February to mid-March 2009, nearly 13 inches of precipitation occurred, which resulted in a water level increase in the North Quarry of 39 feet (increase in water elevation from 737 feet amsl to 776 feet amsl). From mid-March to early-August, the total precipitation measured at Los Altos Hills was about 1.2 inches. During this same period of time, the average daily pumping rate from the North Quarry was about 1,100 gallons per minute (gpm), or approximately 2.45 cfs (Figure 4.17). As a result, the water level in the North Quarry declined back to an elevation of 737 feet amsl by early-August. Another significant rainstorm event occurred in mid-October 2009, with a total precipitation of 4.2 inches over a two-day period. As a result, the water level in the North Quarry increased from an elevation of 738 feet amsl to 745 feet amsl, with a total change in the volume of water of 1,738,000 cubic feet (40 acre-ft). To determine the amount of surface runoff that entered the North Quarry, a storm water coefficient was estimated based on the following formula:
Where:
RO is the surface runoff into the North Quarry [ft3/d]
2 A is the surface area of the watershed area contributing to the North Quarry [ft ]
P is the daily precipitation [ft/d] C is the storm water coefficient [dimensionless]

3 s is the change in storage, or the change in volume of the water in the North Quarry [ft /d] 3 Q is the pumping rate of water out of the North Quarry [ft /d]
It was assumed that there was no groundwater inflow to the pit during this short-term event. Based on this equation, the storm water coefficient of runoff to the North Quarry for this October rain event was estimated to be 0.3 based on a total watershed area of 375.25 acres (16,345,890 ft2), precipitation of 4.2 inches (0.35 ft), and a total change in water storage of 1,738,000 ft3 (including pumping) over a 4 day period. The total change in storage of water in the North Quarry included the sum of the change in volume of water in the pit, as well as the total amount pumped out from October 12th through October 16th to account for the lag time for surface water to runoff into the North Quarry.
May 2010
28
063-7109
4.6.3
Water Balance Estimates

Evapotranspiration was estimated by taking the difference between annual
The 2009 water year annual water balance summaries for Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek are provided in Table 4.6. precipitation and the annual total streamflow for each station. The water balance for the North Quarry from February 2009 to mid-October 2009 is provided in Table 4.7. The results of the estimated water balance for each are described below.
4.6.3.1 Permanente Creek

The annual water balance for Permanente Creek for WY 2009 is presented on Table 4.6. The total annual streamflow observed at MS-1 was 8.1 inches, of which 3.9 inches is estimated to be from baseflow and 4.2 inches is estimated to be surface runoff. At MS-2, the total annual streamflow was 6.8 inches, with 5.2 inches coming from baseflow and 1.6 inches coming from surface runoff.
4.6.3.2 Monte Bello Creek

The annual water balance for Monte Bello Creek for WY 2009 is presented on Table 4.6. The total annual streamflow observed at MS-3 and MS-4 for was 13.4 and 8.8 inches, respectively. Baseflow is estimated to be 1.8 inches at both locations; therefore, the annual surface water runoff at MS-3 and MS-4 is estimated to be 11.6 and 7.0 inches, respectively.
4.6.3.3 North Quarry

Table 4.7 is a summary of the water balance for the North Quarry from February 2009 to mid-October 2009. The primary goal of estimating the water balance for the North Quarry was to provide a calibration point for the numerical groundwater flow model in order to estimate the impacts of proposed mining of the South Quarry on Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek (discussed in Section 5). Using the data provided by Lehigh, the groundwater inflow into the North Quarry was estimated from the following formula:
Where: VGW is the total volume of groundwater entering the pit VPIT is the change in volume of the water in the pit VPUMPED is the volume of water pumped out of the pit VPRECIP is the volume of water from direct precipitation into the pit VEVAP is the volume of water lost to evaporation based on the surface area of the pit water VRUNOFF is the volume of water from runoff using the catchment area of the North Quarry and a runoff coefficient of 0.3
Figure 4.18 is a semi-log plot of the various components of inflow calculated from the water balance estimated for the North Quarry. Over the available period of record, the total amount of inflow into the North Quarry was 37,395,000 ft3 (858 acre-ft), with a range of flow from 210 gpm to 5,700 gpm. The total
May 2010
29
063-7109
surface water runoff that entered the North Quarry from February 2009 to mid-October 2009 was estimated to be 7,729,000 ft3 (177 acre-ft), with a range of inflows from 0 to over 8,800 gpm. The total estimated amount of groundwater that entered the North Quarry was 29,412,000 ft3 (675 acre-ft), with a range of inflows from about 210 gpm (5th-percentile) to 1,480 gpm (95th-percentile), and a geometric mean of 687 gpm. From early September to mid-October, the North Quarry water level remained constant at 738 feet amsl while the daily pumping rate remained steady at 211 gpm; therefore, suggesting that the ambient groundwater seepage into the North Quarry is about 0.47 cfs (211 gpm) during the dry season.
4.7
Groundwater Recharge
Groundwater recharge is estimated to range from about 2 to 4 inches based on the water balance summaries presented on Table 4.6. Recharge is expected to be greater in the limestone units rather than the greenstone/graywacke units, because the limestone is more permeable than the greenstone/graywacke. The greater recharge in the limestone is demonstrated by the observed response to recharge in piezometers completed in the limestone while those in the greenstone/graywacke did not respond (Section 4.3).
May 2010
30
063-7109
5.0 5.1
HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODELING Modeling Objectives
Groundwater modeling was performed to evaluate the following issues concerning the development of the South Quarry and continued mining and subsequent reclamation of the North Quarry: 1. Groundwater inflows into the North Quarry as mining in the North Quarry continues to its ultimate depth (at about 440 ft amsl); 2. Groundwater inflows into the South Quarry from Phases 1 through 5; 3. The effect that development and reclamation of the South Quarry and reclamation of the North Quarry will have on the local surface hydrology, in particular, Permanente and Monte Bello Creeks; 4. The effect of development and reclamation of the South Quarry and reclamation of the North Quarry will have on local groundwater supply wells; and 5. The distribution of pore pressures in the pit slopes of the South Quarry to verify geotechnical assumptions relative to slope stability. The numerical flow model used the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) code MODFLOW-2000 (Harbaugh et al, 2000). A cross-section flow model (orientated north-south) through the two quarries was developed using the code SEEP/W (Geo-Slope, 2001) to evaluate the pore pressure distribution within the pit slopes. The two numerical models were developed using the hydrogeologic data described in the previous sections. The key elements of this conceptual model are as follows: Hydrostratigraphy the distribution of the principal lithologies (greenstone/graywacke and limestone) both vertically and laterally. in the area
Hydraulic properties the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, storativity and porosity of the hydrostratigraphic units. Groundwater levels and flow the piezometric heads, flow directions and hydraulic gradients (lateral and vertical). Water balance groundwater sources (infiltration of precipitation) and sinks (discharge to the local creeks, the Santa Clara Valley and the existing North Quarry) The conceptual hydrogeologic model for the Quarry is described in further detail in the following sections.
5.2
Conceptual Model Description

The groundwater flow at the Quarry generally mimics
The hydrostratigraphy of the Quarry consists of a complex heterogeneous groundwater system within greenstone, limestone and graywacke units. surface topography, with recharge occurring at higher elevations and prominent ridges, and discharge occurring at low-lying areas, several creeks and the North Quarry.
May 2010
31
063-7109
5.2.1 Groundwater Flow

Figure 4.9 shows the interpreted piezometric contours in the planned South Quarry area based on measured groundwater levels in monitoring wells and piezometers during October 2009. These wells and piezometers are completed in either limestone or greenstone units. The highest heads were recorded in the three wells located along the ridgeline (between 1,560 and 1,750 ft amsl) and the lowest levels were recorded in the wells located near Permanente Creek (between 1,030 and 1,060 ft amsl). Groundwater flow is preferentially within the more permeable limestone blocks. However, because the limestone blocks are limited in extent, the overall groundwater flow system is controlled by the less permeable greenstone unit. Additionally, because of the higher permeability within the limestone blocks, the horizontal hydraulic gradient is flatter within the limestone than the greenstone. The groundwater encountered in most of the monitoring wells and geotechnical boreholes completed in the greenstone and limestone is perched over a much deeper regional groundwater system. The perched groundwater is interpreted to be separated from the deeper system by low permeability greenstone. Evidence for this deeper groundwater system was observed during the drilling of HG-11, when lost circulation of the drilling fluid occurred at an elevation of approximately 1,015 feet amsl.
5.2.2 Recharge and Discharge

Recharge to the groundwater system is by the infiltration of precipitation. The areas with flatter slopes or areas in topographic lows receive more recharge, because runoff of the rainfall is less than the runoff generated from the steeper slopes. Runoff from the steeper slopes accumulates in topographically low spots, thereby increasing infiltration. Discharge of groundwater is to surface water bodies, such as Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek and their tributaries where the groundwater table intersects ground surface. The areas of discharge are in the southeast and northeast area of the Quarry, where the groundwater intercepts Permanente Creek and Monte Bello Creek in the topographically low areas. The private vineyards located on the southern crest of Monte Bello ridge are believed to be irrigated using groundwater pumped from several supply wells. The exact locations, depths and water column height in these wells are unknown at this time. Figure 5-1 shows the location of the vineyards.
5.3
5.3.1
Numerical Groundwater Flow Model

Model Code
The numerical groundwater flow model uses the USGS finite-difference code MODFLOW-2000 (Harbaugh et al, 2000) to simulate flow, and is implemented using the commercial graphical user interface program GMS (version 7.0).
May 2010
32
063-7109
5.3.2
Model Geometry
Figure 5.1 shows the lateral extent (domain) of the MODFLOW model. The model domain coincides with the surface watershed for Permanente and Monte Bello Creeks to the west and south, and for an unnamed creek to the north. The models eastern limit coincides with the western edge of the Santa Clara Valley/Monta Vista Fault). The model occupies an area of approximately nine square miles, and is roughly centered on the North Quarry and the planned South Quarry. The model contains 370 rows and 500 columns (although not all cells are active). All model cells have dimensions of 50 feet by 50 feet in plan view (Figure 5.2).
5.3.3
Layering and Hydrostratigraphy
The model employs six layers to represent the hydrostratigraphy (Figures 5.3 and 5.4). The top surface of the model was developed based on the digital elevation model (DEM) data at a 10-meter resolution (Figure 5.5). The models base was developed as sloping from about 900 feet amsl at the western boundary to 200 feet below msl at the east. Apart from in the area of the quarries where limestone occurs, the model represents greenstone. The layering near the quarries was developed to enable the detailed lithologic interpretation of the limestone and greenstone units to be represented. For example, the north-south section through the North Quarry (Figure 5.3) illustrates how the limestone unit in that area extends to a depth of about 400 feet amsl, through layers 1 through 5, inclusive. On the same figures, the base of the limestone block at the planned South Quarry is notably shallower, and is contained solely within model layer 1.
5.3.4
Hydraulic Properties
The initial hydraulic properties assigned to the modeled units were based on the results and interpretation from the aquifer pumping test and other single-well (packer) tests reported in Section 4.4.2.3. These values were adjusted as part of the calibration task (see Section 5.3.6).
5.3.5
Boundary Conditions
Discrete boundary conditions were assigned to the model to enable groundwater to enter or leave the model in agreement with the general and local water budget described in Section 4.6. These boundary conditions are: Constant heads assigned along the up-gradient (western) and down-gradient (eastern) limits to represent groundwater inflow and outflow, respectively (Figure 5.1). Rivers head-dependent conditions simulating the movement of groundwater into or out of the main creek reaches. The creek bed elevation was set based on the top surface elevation of the model, and the creek stage (water level) was set at 2 feet above the bed elevation. Drains head-dependent conditions simulating the extraction of groundwater in the North Quarry as a seepage face along the slopes and in the base of the pit. The drain elevation was set at 2 feet below the land surface.
May 2010
33
063-7109
Recharge applied at the uppermost model layer, ranging from 2 inches/year in the lowlying east to 8 inches/year on the north-facing upland areas. The other lateral boundaries and the base of the model were assigned as no-flow conditions.
5.3.6
Model Calibration
5.3.6.1 Approach
The model was initially run to steady-state conditions, and an initial piezometric head result obtained. From there, the model calibration approach involved manually adjusting the key model parameters principally the hydraulic properties, and to a lesser extent, the boundary conditions and layering until the model results reasonably represented the observed data. following during 2009: Piezometric levels measured in wells and vibrating-wire piezometers completed in the limestone and greenstone units (HG-2, etc.) Estimated groundwater discharge at the North Quarry (based on the water budget) Estimated groundwater discharge (baseflow) to the monitored reaches of Permanente and Monte Bello Creeks The calibration targets consisted of the
5.3.6.2 Calibration Results (Current Conditions) 5.3.6.2.1 Piezometric Heads
Figures 5.6 and 5.7 show the simulated groundwater levels in the topmost model layer in the entire model and in the quarry areas, respectively. In general, the modeled groundwater flow is from west to east, with local discharge at the creeks and the North Quarry. Figure 5.8 plots the observed and modeled piezometric heads for the ten key monitoring wells and piezometers. In the area of the planned South Quarry, the simulated groundwater flow direction is towards the northeast (that is, discharging to Permanente Creek). The simulated heads near the planned South Quarry are generally lower than those measured in October 2009. The largest differences (or residuals) occur for the three wells near the ridge crest to the south (HG-4, HG-5 and HG-6), and the smallest differences are for the wells located near Permanente Creek. The effect of this apparent discrepancy is that the model underpredicts the groundwater elevations and local hydraulic gradient near the groundwater divide between Permanente and Monte Bello Creeks. Numerous variations of hydraulic properties and layering within a reasonable range were tested to improve the head match in this area, but the results were relatively insensitive to these changes. Also, features such as barrier faults and fault gouge layers were tested to improve the head match, but were also relatively insensitive to these variations. It is likely that complex geological structure of the greenstone and limestone units results in the groundwater in the area being more compartmentalized and heterogeneous than the model is able to simulate without suffering mathematical instability.
May 2010
34
063-7109
Although the largest head residuals occur in the three wells near the ridgeline, the maximum development of the southern wall of the South Quarry will not extend deep enough to intercept the measured water table in this area. Therefore, although the modeled heads are lower than measured, the model is expected to reasonably predict the groundwater seepage rate into the south wall of the South Quarry during mining, as well as predicting effects of discharge to Monte Bello Creek and Permanente Creek.
5.3.6.2.2
Water Budget
Table 5.1 summarizes the overall steady-state (annual average) water budget for the calibrated model. The largest inflow is precipitation-derived recharge (accounting for 90 percent of the total inflows), and the largest outflows are to the creeks (totaling more than 60 percent of the outflows).
May 2010
35
063-7109
Table 5.1 - Modeled Annual Groundwater Budget (Current Conditions)

Feature
Constant Heads Recharge North Quarry Permanente Creek upper Permanente Creek middle Permanente Creek lower Monte Bello Creek upper Monte Bello Creek middle Monte Bello Creek lower Other creeks Totals
INFLOWS
121 1,955 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 30 2,166
OUTFLOWS
305 0 500 293 290 66 63 102 156 396 2,171
NET
-184 1,955 -500 -293 -230 -63 -63 -102 -154 -366 -
Comments
-0.3 2.7 -0.7 -0.40 -0.32 -0.09 -0.09 -0.14 -0.21 -0.51 Ranging from 2 to 6 in/yr Using Drain Boundary
afy
0.20 2.7 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 0.04 3.0
cfs
afy
0.40 0 0.70 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.22 0.55 3.0
cfs
afy
cfs
condition Upstream from MS-1 Between MS-1 and MS-2 Downstream from MS-2 Upstream from MS-3 Between MS-3 and MS-4 Downstream from MS-4
The simulated current groundwater discharge to the North Quarry (500 AFY or 310 gpm) is within the average annual range of 200 to 600 gpm estimated based on the field measurements and water balance (Section 4.6). The simulated and observed groundwater discharge rates to the monitored Permanente and Monte Bello Creek reaches are as shown in Table 5.2. The middle reach of Permanente Creek is affected by the current North Quarry, with the creek bed (1,000 to 1,100 ft amsl) more than 250 feet higher than the base of the nearby North Quarry (750 ft amsl). The North Quarrys groundwater influence area includes part of Permanente Creek.
Table 5.2 - Observed and Modeled Groundwater Discharge to Creeks

Creek Reach
Permanente Creek upper Permanente Creek middle Monte Bello Creek upper Monte Bello Creek middle
Observed (cfs)
0.31 0.73 0.08 0.06
Simulated (cfs)
0.40 0.32 0.09 0.14
Location
Upstream from MS-1 Between MS-1 and MS-2 Upstream from MS-3 Between MS-3 and MS-4
The hydraulic properties and layering are summarized in Table 5.3.
May 2010
36
063-7109
Table 5.3 - Modeled Hydraulic Conductivity Values

Model Layer Limestone Kh (ft/d)
1 2 3 4 5 6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 NA
Greenstone Kh (ft/d)
0.075 0.075 0.0375 0.0375 0.025 0.01
Comments
Kz (ft/d)
0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 NA
Kz (ft/d)
0.0015 0.0015 0.00075 0.00075 0.0005 0.0004 Limestone only in N Quarry area Limestone only in N Quarry area Limestone only in N Quarry area
5.3.7
Simulation of Quarry Development and Reclamation
5.3.7.1 Approach
The calibrated (current conditions) model was used to simulate the discrete phases of the future Quarry development and reclamation. These phases consist of a series of conditions defined by the different topography at and near the Quarry area. These are shown in Figures 5.9 through 5.14. The current base of the North Quarry is at approximately 750 ft amsl (Figure 5.9). Under Phase 1, the base of the North Quarry will be deepened a further 310 feet (to elevation 440 ft amsl) while the South Quarry development starts (Figure 5.10). During subsequent phases, the South Quarry will be expanded as the North Quarry is backfilled. The North Quarry will be backfilled to an elevation of 990 ft amsl. The South Quarry will be at its deepest (elevation 925 ft amsl) in Phase 5, at which time the backfilling of the North Quarry will be essentially completed (Figure 5.14). At the conclusion of Phase 5, the South Quarry will be backfilled to a minimum elevation of 1,110 ft amsl. Table 5.4 presents the lowest pit elevation and approximate affected area for the North and South Quarries for each phase that were used to develop each discrete simulation case.
May 2010
37
063-7109
Table 5.4 - Summary of Quarry Development and Reclamation Phasing

Phase No. Lowest Pit Elevation (ft amsl) North
750
Approx. Model Footprint Area (acres) North

346
Comments
Current Conditions 1
South
-
South
-
Current Conditions Parts Quarry of layers 1-4 were
440
1,250
346
31
inactivated at the center of North 2 3 4 5 - Pre-SQ Backfill 5 - Post-SQ backfill 990 1,110 346 179 840 990 990 990 1,250 1,200 1,150 925 346 346 346 346 87 139 160 179
The MODFLOW model simulated the hydrologic effects of these phases by a combination of (a) revising the upper model surface at the quarry areas to equal the planned topographic surfaces, and (2) the addition of Drain boundary conditions at both the base of the pit and along the sloping areas to enable groundwater intercepting the land surface to discharge. The elevations of the Drain conditions were set at one foot below groundwater in each cell. Only for Phase 1 were the model cells at the center the North Quarry made inactive. North-south sections through the model (B-B; see Figures 5.10 5.14) illustrate the layering for each phase. For backfill, a high hydraulic conductivity (1,000 ft/day for Kh and Kv) was assigned to the new material in place of the extracted limestone. was run to steady-state, thereby representing average annual conditions. Drain conditions were set with elevations of one foot below land surface to extract groundwater that intercepts land surface. Each case
5.3.7.2 Simulation Results

Figures 5.15 and 5.16 show the simulated piezometric heads in the uppermost model layer for Phases 1 and 5. Under Phase 1, the North Quarry will continue to act as a major groundwater inflow feature whereas the South Quarry will not have been sufficiently developed to intercept groundwater beyond localized perched water. Groundwater discharge to Permanente Creek in this area will continue to be mostly from the south. By Phase 5, the North Quarry will have been fully reclaimed, and the highly-permeable pit backfill material (extending from 990 to 440 ft amsl) will continue to act as a groundwater sink (i.e., groundwater will flow
May 2010
38
063-7109
into the pit). The South Quarry will be at its full development depth (925 ft amsl) and will intercept some groundwater that would otherwise discharge to Permanente Creek. Table 5.5 presents the average annual changes in groundwater discharge for the North and South Quarries and the four monitored reaches of Permanente and Monte Bello Creeks.
Table 5.5 - Summary of Predicted Changes in Groundwater Discharge Compared to Current Conditions
Phase No. North Quarry South Quarry Permanente Creek upper(1)
cfs 0.40 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Permanente Creek middle(2)

cfs 0.32 -0.09 -0.11 +0.46 +0.46 +0.18 +0.47
Monte Bello Creek upper(3)

cfs 0.09 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Monte Bello Creek middle(4)

cfs 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 -0.01 <0.01 <0.01
gpm Current Conditions 1 2 3 4 5 - Pre-SQ Backfill 5 - Post-SQ +61 +60 +58 +62 -236 -230 310
gpm 0 <10 <10 +11 <10 +90 +10
Backfill Notes: (1) upstream from MS-1; (2) between MS-2 and MS-1; (3) upstream from MS-3; (4) between MS-3 and MS-4. Positive changes indicate a net increase in annual average groundwater discharge to feature.
The results indicate the following: The average annual groundwater inflow into the North Quarry will increase during Phase 1 compared to current conditions by an additional 61 gpm. The inflow rate will decrease during Phases 2 through 5 as the North Quarry is reclaimed (backfilled) from 440 to 990 ft amsl. Sustained groundwater inflow will not occur into the South Quarry until Phase 5 (up to 90 gpm), when the base of the South Quarry will be at its lowest elevation. Because of the heterogeneous conditions in the quarry area, short-term (seasonal) groundwater inflow will occur as perched zones with isolated groundwater are mined out. The simultaneous development of the South Quarry and the reclamation of the North Quarry will have no measurable impact on groundwater discharge to Monte Bello Creek, and to the upper reach (above station MS-1) of Permanente Creek. The simultaneous development of the South Quarry and the reclamation of the North Quarry will result in a decrease in groundwater discharge to the middle reach (between MS-1 and MS-2) of Permanente Creek of 0.09 cfs (40 gpm) during Phase 1. This reflects
May 2010
39
063-7109
the effect of substantially deepening of the North Quarry. During Phase 2, this decrease in groundwater flow to this reach will be 0.11 cfs. If no groundwater inflow into the North Quarry is removed for Phases 3 and 4 (when the quarry is essentially fully backfilled), then the middle reach of Permanente Creek will receive 0.46 cfs more groundwater discharge than under current conditions. The predicted annual average post-mining water elevation in the South Quarry is approximately 1,105 ft amsl. This is approximately 5 feet below the backfill elevation and the low-point surface water overflow elevation of approximately 1,110 ft amsl. Therefore, there will be no direct surface water runoff from the post-mining South Quarry to Permanente Creek. However, there will be groundwater discharge from the South Quarry to Permanente Creek. The average annual groundwater discharge from the flooded South Quarry is estimated to be approximately 10 gpm. The post-mining water balance is discussed in Section 5.4. Groundwater will continue to flow into the North Quarry under post-mining conditions, albeit at a lower rate than under current conditions. The water level in the North Quarry will reach a maximum elevation equal to the backfill elevation of 990 ft amsl. The postmining water balance is discussed further in Section 5.4. The modeling results also predict that the planned Quarry expansion will have no significant impact on groundwater levels in the supply wells located along Monte Bello Ridge, located approximately between and one mile from the center of the South Quarry. Therefore, operation of these wells will not be adversely affected by the planned expansion and reclamation.
5.4
5.4.1
Post-Mining Quarry Water Balance

Approach
The results of the groundwater (MODFLOW) modeling and analytical water budget were used to determine the water budget for the two quarries under post-mining (reclaimed) conditions. The main assumptions for this are described below. The total amount of backfill placed in and water flowing into each quarry was calculated on monthly increments. For the North Quarry, it was assumed that 4 years was required to backfill the quarry to an elevation of 990 ft amsl. For the South Quarry, it was assumed that one year was required to backfill the quarry to an elevation of 1,110 ft amsl. During filling, the water table elevation within each quarry was calculated based on the total cumulative amount of water in the quarry compared to the total cumulative backfill volume, assuming a backfill porosity of 30 percent. The net total water entering each quarry was calculated based on the monthly precipitation, surface water runoff, and groundwater inflow. The assumptions used for the water balance are as follows: Precipitation - Water entering each quarry from direct precipitation was equal to the 1999-2009 monthly average precipitation observed at the Los Altos Hills station. The monthly precipitation inflow rate was equal to the product of the monthly precipitation and the surface area of the backfill or flooded portion of the quarry from the previous month. Surface Water - Water entering each quarry as surface water runoff was based on the surface capture area, monthly precipitation and a surface water runoff coefficient of 0.1. The runoff coefficient was provided by Chang Consultants (Chang, 2010), and is based
May 2010
40
063-7109
on soil type B for shrub land. The monthly surface capture area of the pit decreased as the surface area of the flooded quarry/backfill area increased. North Quarry 90% of the runoff within the surface water capture area will be diverted to a sedimentation basin and routed to Permanente Creek before it reaches the backfill of the North Quarry. South Quarry - most of the surface runoff within the footprint of the South Quarry will be diverted away from the South Quarry. Therefore, surface runoff will occur from only the very interior 26.4 acres of the South Quarry. Groundwater Inflow - Groundwater entering each quarry was based on the results of the MODFLOW model. The groundwater inflow to the North Quarry ranged from 371 gpm (end of Phase 1) to 80 gpm (Phase 5, post-backfill). Groundwater inflow to the South Quarry ranged from 90 gpm (end of Phase 5, pre-backfill) to less than 10 gpm (Phase 5, post-backfill). The water balance assumed that groundwater inflow declined over time as the quarries backfill filled with water. The groundwater inflow to the North Quarry decreased from 371 gpm at the start of reclamation to 80 gpm when the height of the water table reached elevation of 990 ft amsl. For the South Quarry, the groundwater inflow decreased from 90 to 10 gpm over the filling period. Evaporation - Evaporation was not accounted for as the water elevations in the reclaimed North and South Quarries are equal to or below the elevations of the backfill.
5.4.2
Results
Tables 5.6 and 5.7 summarize the results of the estimated post-mining monthly water balance when the water levels have reached equilibrium for the North and South Quarry, respectively. The estimated time to flood the North Quarry backfill is approximately 14 years; for the South Quarry, the estimated time is approximately 6 years. For the South Quarry, the estimated total average annual inflow at equilibrium is 26 gpm. For the North Quarry, the estimated total average annual inflow at equilibrium is 169 gpm. At equilibrium, these quantities are expected to discharge to Permanente Creek primarily as groundwater depending on the permeability of the materials separating the quarry from the creek. During periods of intense rainfall, and during seasonal high groundwater conditions, there is a potential that discharge from the reclaimed North Quarry to Permanente Creek may occur as surface water if appropriate water management techniques are not employed.
May 2010
41
063-7109
6.0 6.1
GEOCHEMICAL DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW Objectives
The objective of the geochemical evaluation was to establish and document current conditions for surface water and groundwater quality. A separate report will provide the analysis of projected water quality after implementation of the project and recommendations for water-quality management. Water quality conditions of the Quarry were characterized over a one-year period. To evaluate the environmental behavior of geologic materials present at the proposed South Quarry, geochemical characterization of overburden (rock and soil) and ore materials was conducted. Both laboratory and field-scale testing was conducted to evaluate the potential for metal leaching. sampling was also conducted at the North Quarry. Mine water quality
6.2
6.2.1
Data Collection
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring
As discussed in Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2, to characterize current groundwater and surface water quality within the vicinity of the proposed South Quarry, surface water and groundwater sampling was conducted. Groundwater and surface water monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3.1. Surface water samples were collected from two locations on Permanente Creek (SW-1 and SW-2) and one location on Monte Bello Creek (SW-3). SW-1 is located upstream of the North Quarry; however, this monitoring location is downstream of the West Material Storage Area (WMSA) created during development of the North Quarry and therefore subject to potential influences associated with this operation. downgradient of the North Quarry sump discharge location. Groundwater sampling was conducted at five monitoring wells located within the footprint of the proposed South Quarry: HG-4, HG-6, HG-7, HG-9 and HG-10S. Monitoring well details, including observations on sulfide occurrence, are provided in Table 6.1. Four of the five wells are completed within the greenstone or graywacke/greenstone units. Well HG-10S is completed in the limestone unit. Four rounds of water quality monitoring were conducted: February 2009; April 2009; September/October 2009 and January 2010. Storm water from the North Quarry was being discharged to Permanente Creek during the first three sampling events. During the final sampling event in January 2010, there was no storm water discharge to Permanente Creek. Climatic conditions affect surface water quality. During dry periods, stream baseflow is maintained by groundwater discharge. During wet periods, streamflow represents a combination of surface runoff and groundwater discharge. Precipitation data for the Los Altos Hills station over the period of water quality monitoring are shown in Figure 6.1. The September 2009 sampling event occurred following an extended dry period. Surface water sampling in January 2010 was conducted on three separate days. Stations SW-2 is located
May 2010
42
063-7109
SW-3, SW-1 and SW-2 were sampled on January 14th, 19th, and 20th, respectively. On January 19th and 20th, greater than 2 inches of precipitation was recorded at the Los Altos Hills station on each day.
6.2.2
North Quarry Mine Water Quality Monitoring Data
The following North Quarry samples were collected on January 13, 2010: North Quarry (NQ) - A water sample collected from the southern portion of the North Quarry. The estimated depth of water in the North Quarry at the time of sampling was approximately 10 feet. Storage Area Runoff (SP) A runoff sample collected from the haul road located downgradient of the WMSA. This water ultimately discharges into the North Quarry. This sample is assumed to be representative of WMSA runoff.
6.2.3
North Quarry Storm Water Monitoring
Storm water monitoring is an operational requirement for the North Quarry. Considerable rainfall (more than 0.5 inches) is required to generate runoff at the Quarry (URS, 2008). The storm water monitoring program includes collection of a number of samples along Permanente Creek, both upstream and adjacent to the North Quarry. Storm water monitoring locations are shown in Figure 6.2. Creek monitoring locations are identified by CR in the name. Descriptions for selected monitoring stations are listed in Table 6.2. The background Permanente Creek storm water monitoring station (SL-BG-CR) is located approximately 1,400 feet upstream of SW-1. Station SL-14-CR is located approximately 270 feet downstream of SW-2. Storm water monitoring samples are analyzed for pH, temperature and conductivity in the field. Laboratory analysis includes total suspended solids (TSS), oil and grease, chemical oxygen demand, pH and conductivity. An estimate of stream flow rate (assumed to be a visual estimation reported in cubic feet/sec) is also recorded. Data from two monitored storm events in 2006 (January 18, 2006 and February 27, 2006) are presented in this report.
6.2.4
Published Data - Regional Water Quality Data Compilation
Additional water quality data for Permanente Creek were obtained from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB, 2007). Between 2000 and 2003, watershed monitoring was conducted in nine watersheds, including the Stevens Creek/Permanente Creek watershed, over a range of climatic conditions. The goals of this monitoring included documentation of ambient water quality conditions in potentially clean and polluted areas and identification of specific water quality problems preventing the realization of beneficial uses of water in targeted watersheds. Watershed data were compared with water quality thresholds for assigned beneficial uses and analyzed for spatial and temporal trends and linkages with land use (SFBRWQCB, 2007). As part of this study, station PER070 (location shown in Figure 6.3) was sampled in June 2002, April 2002 and January 2003. PER070 is located about one mile downstream of the Permanente Facility on
May 2010 Permanente Creek. conditions: Dry June 2002 Spring April 2002 Wet January 2003
43
063-7109
Sample collection was intended to be representative of the following climatic
Sampling did not occur during storm events. Samples were collected in well-mixed stream sections by uncapping, filling and recapping the container just below the water surface. Samples collected for dissolved metals analyses were collected into a clean syringe and syringe-filtered into the sample container. Sample analysis included organics, total and dissolved organic carbon (TOC and DOC), total and dissolved metals, nutrients and conventional parameters (SFBRWQCB, 2007).
6.2.5
Geochemical Laboratory Testing
The Quarry stratigraphy consists of alternating series of limestone and metabasalt (greenstone) units separated by low-angle faults. These units are overlain by continentally-derived graywackes, shales, and argillites (Foruria, 2004). Geologic conditions within the vicinity of the proposed South Quarry were characterized by Geocon Consultants, Inc. (Geocon) for the purposes of geochemical testing of representative geologic rock units. Geocons evaluation of both the surficial and subsurface geologic conditions included the following: a literature review; geologic reconnaissance of the North Quarry; review of boring logs and core sample photographs for 48 borings drilled within and adjacent to the proposed South Quarry; review of select core samples from 13 of the 48 borings; and, outcrop reconnaissance within the vicinity of the South Quarry. Geocon identified the following major rock types within the South Quarry exploration area (Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2009a): Graywacke: Generally medium to dark grey quartzose graywacke comprising grains of quartz, chert, feldspar, and feldsapthic lithic fragments. Crystalline calcite appears to be present as secondary fillings. Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone: Very light grey to medium dark grey with common white to very light grey veining. The limestone has a fine crystalline texture. Geocons report (2009) made no mention of the occurrence of sulfides within the limestone; however, weathered faces and the faces of open fractures were described as grayish yellow to pale yellowish orange. Foruria (2004) noted that the black limestones, deposited in an anoxic environment, often possess trace amounts of diagenetic pyrite, locally ranging up to 2%. Pyrite also occurs in trace amounts within the light grey micritic limestone units. Fault Breccia Highly fractured and sheared rock that includes a mixture of the following identifiable lithologies: graywacke, limestone, dolomitic limestone, greenstone, metabasalt and chert. Greenstone Generally dark greenish grey to dusky yellow green chloritic meta-basalt. Metabasalt Generally medium to dark grey fine crystalline rock. Dominant minerals include feldspars, hornblende and quartz.
May 2010
44
063-7109
Chert White to very light grey to grayish pink very fine crystalline rock. The chert is typically interbedded with or occurs as inclusions in the limestone and dolomitic limestone. For the purposes of overburden characterization, Geocon noted that the metabasalt and greenstone could be combined into a single rock type and that the chert could be combined with the limestone (Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2009). Geocon prepared six composite rock samples, representative of each of the six major rock types listed above, for geochemical characterization (Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2009b). The number of samples collected for each composite sample was based on the observed variability within a rock type (i.e., more samples were collected for the rock types with the most variability) (Table 6.3). An overburden soil sample was also submitted for analysis (sample ID CS-01). Geochemical analysis included the following (Table 6.4): Acid base accounting Elemental analysis Static leach testing Samples were submitted to a California-certified laboratory for analysis. The California modified Waste Extraction Test (WET) was used to characterize the metal leaching potential of the rock and soil samples. The WET test is a 48-hour leach test conducted on a crushed rock sample (minus 2 mm) using a 10 to 1 liquid to solid ratio. The test lixiviant was deionized water. For nonacid generating material, defined as having a ratio of neutralization potential (NP) to acid generation potential (AGP) of greater than 3:1, deionized water may be used in place of the standard sodium citrate lixiviant.
6.2.6
Geochemical Field Testing Pit Wall Washing
To evaluate metal leaching potential under field scale conditions, wall washing was performed on exposed faces within the North Quarry (Figure 6.4). At six sampling locations, field scale leach tests (wall washing) were conducted following the standard procedure outlined in Draft Guidelines and Recommended Methods for the Prediction of Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage at Minesites in British Columbia (Price, 1997). Sample location selection targeted the major rock types and a range of weathering conditions (i.e., fresh faces versus faces following an extended period of exposure). Sample locations are listed in Table 6.5 (site photographs of sample locations shown in Figures 6.5 to 6.10). The test involves washing an approximately one-meter square area of rock face with a known volume of water. The wall washing rinsate is collected and submitted for chemical analysis. Metal leaching rates are calculated on an area basis by multiplying the leachate concentration (mg/L) by the wash volume (L). At each location, between three and five liters of water was applied to an area of 0.6 to 0.8 m2. Due to
May 2010
45
063-7109
loss of water to the wall face (adsorption), approximately 1.5 liters of rinsate was collected at each site. Samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. Samples for dissolved metals analysis were filtered (0.45 m filter) upon receipt by the laboratory. Field measurement of pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxidation reduction potential (ORP) was conducted. Wall washing was performed on November 24, 2009. Four days prior to testing, 0.2 inches of rainfall was recorded in the area (Los Altos Hills precipitation record for November 20, 2009). This event was too small to generate sufficient runoff for collection of water samples. Prior to the November 20, 2009 rainfall event, the area had experienced a five-week period without rainfall (Figure 6.1). The most recent prior event recorded 3.9 inches in this area on October 13, 2009 (Los Altos Hills precipitation records). The results of the wall washing tests are therefore representative of conditions that reflect approximately a one-month period of weathering. .
6.2.7
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program
The QA/QC program for sample collection included the following: (1) collection and analysis of field duplicate water samples; (2) collection and analysis of equipment blank and field blank samples; and, (3) calculation of charge balance errors. Components of the QA/QC program are described in Appendix E.
6.3
6.3.1
Monitoring Results
Water Quality Monitoring
A complete summary of water quality results is presented in Appendix D (Table D-1). For comparison, this table includes the following water quality criteria: Basin Plan Water Quality Criteria (California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region, 2007) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) (EPA Region IX, 2007) Water quality results for selected parameters are shown in Figures 6.11 to 6.17. A Piper plot of surface water and groundwater quality results from the first three rounds of monitoring is shown in Figure 6.18. Compositional diagrams, such as Piper plots, facilitate the identification of water types. (chloride, sulfate and bicarbonate) in milliequivalents per liter (meq/L). Piper plots present the relative concentrations of major cations (calcium, magnesium and sodium) and anions
6.3.1.1 Groundwater Quality

Groundwater quality results for selected parameters are presented in Table 6.6 (see Table D-1 for comprehensive results). Major ion chemistry at most groundwater wells (i.e., HG-6, HG-7, HG-9 and HG10S) is similar and classified as Ca-Mg-HCO3 or Mg-Ca-HCO3 type (Figure 6.18). The pH values for samples from these four wells ranged from 7.3 to 8.5 s.u. Total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations ranged from 340 to 550 mg/L (Figure 6.11).
May 2010
46
063-7109
Groundwater quality at well HG-4 is distinct from the other wells. This well consistently reported the highest groundwater pH values, ranging from 8.0 to 8.6 (Figure 6.11). Unlike the other groundwater wells, sodium and sulfate are the dominant cation and anion at this well, respectively. The TDS concentration at this well, which ranged from 880 to 1,500 mg/L, was elevated relative to the other groundwater wells (Figure 6.11). Groundwater quality at this well exhibited greater temporal variability than the other wells. For example, between February 2009 and January 2010, chloride concentrations decreased by a factor of two (from 51 to 25 mg/L) (Figure 6.12). Groundwater quality at HG-4 may be indicative of older groundwater at this location relative to the other wells. The observed differences in groundwater quality may also be attributed to contamination from drilling fluids or grout that is still being flushed from the well. The latter would explain the elevated pH and decline in TDS and chloride. Groundwater quality results for selected parameters are summarized below: Dissolved Metals - The following dissolved metals were consistently below detectable limits in groundwater samples, or when detected, were present at low concentrations ( 1 g/L): antimony (Sb), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), silver (Ag) and thallium (Tl). With the exception of well HG-10S, dissolved arsenic was detected in all groundwater samples, ranging from less than a microgram per liter (< 1 g/L) to nine micrograms per liter (9 g/L) (Figure 6.13). Dissolved molybdenum, nickel and zinc groundwater concentrations ranged from less than a microgram per liter (< 1 g/L) to tens of micrograms per liter (10s g/L) (Figures 6.14 and 6.15). Maximum dissolved molybdenum (45 g/L) and nickel (24 g/L) were both measured at well HG-4. With the exception of HG-4, dissolved selenium concentrations were less than a microgram per liter (< 1 g/L). HG-4 selenium concentrations ranged from less than a microgram per liter to 4 g/L. Dissolved Iron and Manganese Dissolved manganese concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from less than a microgram per liter to 0.3 mg/L. Well HG-7 reported the highest dissolved manganese concentrations (up to 0.33 mg/L) (Figure 6.14). Peak dissolved iron concentrations were also measured at this well (up to 0.33 mg/L) (Figure 6.15). Nutrients Nutrient concentrations in groundwater samples were generally low. Ammonia and phosphorus concentrations ranged from below detectable limits to 0.3 mg/L-N and 0.6 mg/L, respectively. With the exception of well HG-9, nitrate concentrations were below 0.1 mg/L-N. Nitrate concentrations at HG-9 range from 0.7 to 1.3 mg/L-N (Figure 6.12).
6.3.1.2 Surface Water Quality

Surface water quality results for selected parameters are presented in Table 6.6 (see Table D-1 for comprehensive results). The major ion chemical signature of the Monte Bello Creek (SW-3) surface water sample is similar to groundwater (i.e., Ca-Mg-HCO3). For the Permanente Creek samples (SW-1 and SW-2), similar to SW-3, calcium is the dominant cation; however, sulfate is the dominant anion (Figure 6.18). Between SW-1 and SW-2, the concentration of calcium, relative to magnesium, increases.
May 2010
47
063-7109
The pHs of all surface water samples ranged from 7.1 to 8.4 (Figure 6.11). The TDS concentration of Monte Bello Creek was relatively stable, ranging from 340 mg/L to 360 mg/L during the four sampling events. TDS concentrations were higher in Permanente Creek, ranging from 350 to 1,800 mg/L. Monitoring stations SW-1 and SW-2 reported a significant decline in TDS in January 2010. During the monitoring period, TDS at the upstream Permanente Creek monitoring location (SW-1) exhibited greater variability than TDS at the downstream monitoring location (SW-2) (Figure 6.11). The observed TDS concentration trends are primarily attributed to sulfate (Figure 6.12). Sulfate concentrations at SW-1 ranged from 110 to 1,100 mg/L. Sulfate concentrations at SW-2 were relatively stable during the first three monitoring events, ranging from 550 to 600 mg/L. In January 2010, sulfate at SW-2 declined to 160 mg/L. Sulfate concentrations in Monte Bello Creek remained below 30 mg/L. Surface water quality results for selected parameters are summarized below: Dissolved Metals - The following dissolved metals were consistently below detectable limits in surface water samples, or when detected, were present at low concentrations ( 2 g/L): Be, Cd, chromium (Cr), Pb, Hg, Ag and Tl. Dissolved arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb) concentrations were also below detectable limits or low ( 1 g/L) at SW-1 and SW3. These constituents were detected at part per billion levels (up to 6 g/L) at SW-2 (Figure 6.13). For both constituents, peak concentrations were measured at SW-2 in February 2009 and the lowest concentrations were measured in January 2010. Dissolved selenium (Se), nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), manganese (Mn) and vanadium (V) concentrations are lower at SW-1 and SW-3 than SW-2 (Figures 6.13 to 6.15). Dissolved manganese concentrations are lower in surface water than groundwater (maximum measured concentration of 4 g/L at SW-2). Permanente Creek Dissolved Metal Trends - The following metals (dissolved phase) consistently demonstrate an increasing trend between SW-1 and SW-2: Sb, As, Mn, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, and V. Nutrients Nitrate concentrations are low in Monte Bello Creek (<0.1 mg/L-N). Nitrate concentrations at SW-1 ranged from 0.8 to 5.6 mg/L. Nitrate concentrations typically decreased between SW-1 and SW-2 (Figure 6.12). Ammonia (<0.2 mg/L-N) and phosphorus (<0.6 mg/L) concentrations were low in all surface water samples.
6.3.2
North Quarry Mine Water Quality Monitoring Data
Water quality results for the North Quarry and WMSA runoff are presented in Appendix D (Table D-1). Water quality results for selected parameters are shown in Figures 6.11 to 6.17. Inflows to the North Quarry include direct precipitation, groundwater, and surface runoff. Surface runoff to the North Quarry includes both runoff from undisturbed areas and runoff from disturbed areas and mine facilities (e.g., WMSA runoff, runoff that contacts the quarry walls and quarry road runoff). The North Quarry was sampled on January 13, 2010. The Los Altos Hills station recorded 0.24 inches of precipitation on this date and 0.43 inches of precipitation on the previous day. Based on results for a single sampling event during a rainfall event, North Quarry water quality is characterized as follows: Water Type - The major ion signature of the North Quarry sample was similar to SW-2. Sulfate and calcium were the dominant major ions, reporting concentrations of 550 mg/L
May 2010
48
063-7109
and 210 mg/L, respectively. The pH and TDS of the North Quarry sample were 7.9 and 790 mg/L, respectively. Dissolved Metals The following metals were below detectable limits in the North Quarry sample: Al, Be, Cr, Fe, Pb and Ag. Many metals reported concentrations similar to those measured at SW-2 during the first three sampling events. Metals that were detected in the North Quarry sample include: Sb (8.2 g/L); As (4.5 g/L); Cu (1.5 g/L); Mn (21 g/L), Hg (0.01 g/L), Mo (540 g/L), Ni (160 g/L), Se (82 g/L) and V (400 g/L). Nutrients - The nitrate concentration of the North Quarry sample was 0.7 mg/L-N. Total phosphorus and ammonia concentrations were below detectable limits. The WMSA runoff sample, also collected on January 13, 2010, provides water quality data on one of the inflows to the North Quarry. The TDS of this sample (900 mg/L) was slightly higher than the TDS of the North Quarry sample. The sulfate concentration (550 mg/L) was equivalent to the North Quarry sample. The runoff sample reported 7.6 mg/L-N. The trace metals detected in the North Quarry sample were also typically present in the runoff sample. Metal concentrations in the runoff sample were typically lower than those measured in the North Quarry sample.
6.3.3
North Quarry Storm Water Monitoring
Permanente Creek storm water monitoring data from 2006 are shown in Figures 6.19 and 6.20. The storm water monitoring program includes measurement of conductivity in both the field and the laboratory. Data from the two storm events indicate a general increasing trend in Permanente Creek conductivity from upstream to downstream across the Quarry. Permanente Creek conductivity (lab measured) increases from approximately 400 S/cm (SL-BG-CR) to approximately 900 S/cm (SL-14-CR). The data indicate an increase in conductivity within the reach of Permanente Creek adjacent to the WMSA. The January 2006 field conductivity data also suggest an increase in conductivity along the reach of Permanente Creek adjacent to the North Quarry.
6.3.4
Regional Water Quality Data Compilation

Results for selected constituents are presented in
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board data for Station PER070 are provided in Appendix D (Table D-2) (SFBRWQCB, 2007). Table 6.7. Water quality results for PER070 show temporal variability. Dissolved selenium concentrations ranged from approximately 6 to 19 g/L, with the wet season sample reporting the highest concentration. Seasonal water quality trends for PER070 were different than the other monitored watersheds. The SFBRWQCB report noted that In general, ambient concentrations of contaminants were highest during the dry season, which may be due to dilution during wet weather. (SFBRWQCB, 2007). For site PER070, specific conductance and TDS were highest during the wet sampling event. Many metals (i.e., Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, Hg and Se) reported the highest concentrations in the wet season sample. Sulfate and
May 2010
49
063-7109
nitrate concentrations were also highest in the wet season sample. The wet season pH value (7.5) was slightly lower than the other two sampling events (~8.2).
6.3.5
Geochemical Laboratory Testing
6.3.5.1 Acid Generation Potential

Acid base accounting (ABA) analysis is performed to assess the acid rock drainage (ARD) potential of a material (Table 6.4). ABA analysis results are presented in Table 6.8. Based on the ABA analysis results, all samples are classified as having no acid generation potential (Price, 2009). The paste pH values of all rock samples were alkaline, ranging from 8.0 to 8.6. The overburden soil sample yielded a paste pH value of 7.3. Neutralization potential (NP) values ranged from 62 to 867 kg CaCO3/t for the rock samples. The metabasalt sample reported a higher NP than the limestone sample (644 kg CaCO3/t). The overburden soil sample yielded the lowest NP value of 23 kg CaCO3/t. The sulfide contents of the rock samples ranged from below detectable limits (<0.01 wt. %) for the greenstone and metabasalt samples to 0.92 wt. % for the fault breccia sample. The sulfide concentration of the graywacke, limestone and chert samples were similar (approximately 0.10 wt. %). Acid potential, calculated from sulfide sulfur for the rock samples, ranged from <0.3 to 29 kg CaCO3/t. The total sulfur content of the overburden soil sample was low (0.01 wt. %). Sulfur speciation was not performed on this sample. A common approach for assigning an ARD potential to a material, using ABA results, is to apply the neutralization potential ratio (NPR = NP/AP where AP is acid potential). The actual threshold value for a particular solid is material specific and depends on many factors. An NPR value greater than two (2) is an accepted guideline for a determination of no ARD potential (Price, 2009). California has adopted a threshold NPR guideline value of three (3) for a determination of low ARD potential (RWQCB, 2008). All samples reported NPR values of three or greater potential. and are therefore classified as having no ARD
6.3.5.2 Sulfide Occurrence Sample Representativeness

One composite limestone sample was submitted for ABA analysis. data. The limestone sample, which reported a sulfide content of 0.10 wt. %, appears to be representative of average conditions. Sulfide data for 850 ore samples from the South Quarry are shown in Figure 6.21. Sulfide concentrations range from below detectable limits to 4.7 wt. %, with an average concentration of 0.09 wt. %. Samples with sulfide concentrations greater than 1 wt. % are generally restricted to depths of approximately 400 to 700 feet below ground surface (bgs). The borehole logs suggest that pyrite may not be visually identifiable, even when present at concentrations greater than 1 wt. %. For example, the To evaluate if this sample is representative of typical sulfide occurrence, the ABA analysis result was compared to additional sulfide
May 2010
50
063-7109
sample that reported the highest sulfide concentration of 4.7 wt. % was collected from borehole Geo 431A-08 between 534 and 547 feet. The borehole log did not identify pyrite across this interval (borehole descriptions provided below): FAULT BRECCIA: 534.0 - 540.8 feet; medium light gray; matrix supported; dolomitic limestone. DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE: 540.8 - 558.0 feet; medium light gray; finely- to mediumcrystalline; scattered milky calcite; no visible pyrite; weak reaction to 10% HCl; scattered clasts of greenstone; poor recovery, core broken. Borehole log geologic descriptions for the intervals corresponding to geochemical sample selection are presented in Table 6.9. With the exception of the chert sample, pyrite is present in association with all rock types. Although sulfide was below detectable limits in the greenstone and graywacke samples, the geologic logs indicate that pyrite is present in these units. The apparent discrepancy between the geologic logs and the sulfide analysis results is likely attributed to sample heterogeneity and the size of the sample used for sulfide analysis (i.e., a few grams). Many of the logs describe pyrite occurrence as scattered. Therefore, a single sample cannot adequately represent the range of sulfur conditions throughout the geologic unit. References to pyrite in the geologic logs are summarized in Table 6.10. With the exception of chert, pyrite occurs in association with all rock types. Pyrite is observed near surface (i.e., at depths of less than 50 feet in a number of borehole logs) and at depth. Pyrite occurrence is most often described as scattered. In boreholes GEO 4-24A-08 (173 to 197 feet bgs) and GEO 4-28A-08 (281.3 to 289.8 feet bgs), pyrite cubes up to approximately 5 mm across were observed in the fault breccia and metabasalt, respectively. Framboidal pyrite was observed in borehole GEO 4-26A-08 (680.1 to 698.0 feet) at the limestone/fault breccia contact.
6.3.5.3 Elemental Concentration and Metal Leaching Potential

Elemental analysis (CAM 17 TTLC) results are presented in Table 6.11. For comparison, this table includes average crustal abundance concentrations and regulatory limits for hazardous waste classification. The trace-metal content of each rock type was evaluated to identify potential metals of concern, although an elevated concentration of a particular element does not necessary imply that this element will be mobilized in concentrations that may lead to environmental impacts. The antimony, arsenic, selenium and nickel concentrations of the rock samples are elevated in comparison to average crustal abundance concentrations (Figure 6.22). occur at similar concentrations in most rock types. WET test leach test results are also shown in Table 6.11. The results of leach tests tend to be sensitive to the methodology used (e.g., solid to solution ratio, nature of the lixiviant, grain size reduction). Therefore, although leach tests provide an estimation of which metals are most likely to leach from a Nickel, chromium and antimony concentrations are elevated in the greenstone in comparison to the other rock types (Figure 6.23). Arsenic and selenium
May 2010
51
063-7109
particular material, leachate metal concentrations will exhibit variability related to the specific test methodology used and may not be representative of field scale conditions. Actual surface water runoff and seepage quality will be affected by site-specific conditions (e.g. climate, hydrology and degree of exposure). Therefore, although the WET test results provide an indication of potential constituents of concern, they may not be indicative of future site concentrations. Static leach test methods (e.g., the WET test) do not simulate kinetic processes, such as sulfide oxidation, that can enhance metal leaching. The WET test leachate pHs ranged from 7.6 to 8.4. Leach test results are therefore representative of metal leaching under moderately alkaline conditions. Constituents that are typically mobile under neutral to alkaline pH conditions were detected in the leachates (e.g., Sb, As, Mo and Ni). Leachate antimony, arsenic and nickel concentrations ranged from microgram per liter levels (g/L) to almost 10 g/L (Table 6.11 and Figure 6.24). Antimony and arsenic leachate concentrations did not demonstrate a positive correlation with solid phase concentration. For these constituents, leachate concentrations generally declined as solid phase concentration increased (Figure 6.24). Molybdenum leachate concentrations ranged from a few micrograms per liter to tens of micrograms per liter. Nickel and molybdenum leaching generally increased as solid phase concentration increased (Figure 6.24). The greenstone sample reported the highest leachate nickel concentration. Selenium was only detected in the limestone sample leachate (6 g/L). Mercury was only detected in the limestone and overburden soil sample leachates (0.21 g/L and 0.19 g/L, respectively). Leachate sulfate concentrations ranged from 1.3 to 29 mg/L. Figures 6.26 through 6.32 compare the results of site water quality sampling (i.e., groundwater, surface water, mine water) with laboratory and field scale leach test results for selected constituents.
6.3.6
Geochemical Field Testing Pit Wall Washing
Wall washing results are presented in Table 6.12. The wall washing samples were turbid and often colored (Figure 6.25). Leachate total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations ranged from 530 mg/L to 68,000 mg/L. Total dissolved solids concentrations ranged from 61 to 110 mg/L. Leachate field measured pH values ranged from 6.9 to 9.0. Wall washing test results are therefore representative of metal leaching under circum-neutral to moderately alkaline conditions. Dissolved antimony (up to 0.6 g/L) and selenium (up to 49 g/L) were detected in all limestone leachate samples. These constituents were below detectable limits in the graywacke, chert and greenstone leachate samples. Total recoverable selenium concentrations in the limestone leachates ranged from 60 to 230 g/L. Using the TSS data for these three samples, the solid phase selenium concentration is calculated to range from approximately 2 mg/kg to 430 mg/kg (high grade limestone sample). Dissolved nickel (0.9 to 10 g/L) and molybdenum (0.4 to 98 g/L) were detected in all leachates. Similar to selenium, the high grade limestone sample reported the highest dissolved nickel and molybdenum concentrations. Dissolved arsenic was detected in all leachates, at concentrations ranging from 12 g/L to 33 g/L. Dissolved arsenic concentrations in the limestone leachates were relatively consistent at approximately
May 2010
52
063-7109
20 g/L. Dissolved aluminum (0.06 to 1.8 mg/), iron (0.01 to 1.4 mg/L) and manganese (1.2 to 19 g/L) were present in all wall washing leachates. Sulfate concentrations in the limestone leachates (15 to 100 mg/L) were elevated relative to sulfate concentrations in the graywacke, chert and greenstone leachates (3 to 5 mg/L). limestone sample reported the highest sulfate concentration (100 mg/L). Leachate nitrate concentrations ranged from 0.3 to 12 mg/L-N. The three locations that reported nitrate concentrations greater than 1 mg/L were sites that have been exposed for one year or less. The two oldest sites (exposed for greater than 5 years), reported low nitrate concentrations (0.3 mg/L-N). Ammonia concentrations were less than 0.2 mg/L in four of the six samples. The chert (CT-01) and greenstone (GS-01) leachates reported ammonia concentrations of 0.8 and 4.9 mg/L-N, respectively. Both these locations have been exposed for less than one month. The Quarry uses ammonium nitrate /fuel oil (ANFO) as a blasting agent. Leaching of blasting residuals is a likely source of nitrate and ammonia in wall wash leachates. The high grade
6.3.7
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Results of the QA/QC program are presented in Appendix E. Results of this analysis indicated that the data are of acceptable quality for their intended purpose.
May 2010
53
063-7109
7.0
REFERENCES
Brabb, E.E., Graymer, R.W. and Jones D.L.. 2000. Geologic Map and Map Database of the Palo Alto 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2332 ,U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Blake, M.C., Jr. and Jones, D.L.. 1981. The Franciscan Assemblage and Related Rocks in Northern California: A Reinterpretation. In The Geotectonic Development of California, W.G. Ernst, Editor. California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region, 2007. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). Cooper Jacob, 1946. A Generalized Graphical Method for Evaluating Formation Constants and Summarizing Well-field History. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 27:526-34, 1946. Department of Water Resources, 1975. Bulletin No. 118-1, Evaluation of Ground Water Resources: South San Francisco Bay, Volume III: Northern Santa Clara County Area, December 1975. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), see U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EnviroMINE, Inc., 2007. Hanson Permanente Cement, Permanente Quarry, California, Mine ID # 91-430004, Application for Reclamation Plan Amendment, March 2007. Foruria, J., 2004. Geology of the Permanente Limestone and Aggregate Quarry, Santa Clara County, California: Report prepared for Hanson Permanente Cement, September 24, 2004. Geo-Slope, 2001. Seep/W Software Ver. 4.24 Users Guide. Geo-Slope International Ltd.,Calgary, Canada. Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2009a. Draft - Permanente Quarry - Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California Pit 4 Quarry Exploration Project Rock-Type Categorization, September 14, 2009. Geocon Consultants, Inc., 2009b. Draft - Permanente Quarry - Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California Pit 4 Quarry Exploration Project Representative Rock-Type Sample Collection, October 2, 2009. Golder Associates Inc., 2007. Geotechnical Recommendations for Updated Mine Reclamation Plan Amendment, Hanson Permanente Quarry, Cupertino, California: Report prepared for EnviroMine Inc., January 4, 2007. Golder Associates Inc., 2008. Slope Stability Evaluation for Compliance with SMARA, West Materials Storage Area, Permanente Quarry, Santa Clara County, California, Report prepared for Hanson Aggregates, November 2008. Golder Associates Inc., 2009. Slope Stability Evaluation for Compliance with SMARA, East Materials Storage Area, Permanente Quarry, California, April 2009. Golder Associates Inc., 2009. Keyway Construction Drawing (Letter Transmittal and attached Drawing), East Materials Storage Area, Permanente Quarry, California. July 27, 2009. Golder Associates Inc., 2010. Slope Stability Evaluation for Compliance with SMARA, Revised Grading Plan Update, East Materials Storage Area, Permanente Quarry, California, February 2010. Golder Associates, 2010 (in progress). Geotechnical evaluations and Design Recommendations, Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Update, Santa Clara County, California.
May 2010
54
063-7109
Hanson, R.T., Li, Zhen, and Faunt, C.C., 2004, Documentation of the Santa Clara Valley regional groundwater/surface-water flow model, Santa Clara County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2004-5231. Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., and McDonald, M.G., 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model -- User guide to modularization concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92, 121 p. Mathieson, E. L., 1982. Geology of the Permanente Property, Kaiser Corporation, Permanente, California, unpublished Kaiser Permanente Cement Company report, 34 p. Parkhurst, D.L., and C.A.J. Appelo, 1999. Users Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) - A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4259, Denver, CO, 1999. Price, W.A., 2009. Prediction Manual for Drainage Chemistry from Sulphidic Geologic Materials. MEND Report 1.20.1, December 2009. Price, W.A., 1997. Draft Guidelines and Recommended Methods for the Prediction of Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage at Minesites in British Columbia, 1997. Reclamation Section, Energy and Minerals Division, April 1997. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), 2008, Tech Note: Mine Waste Characterization, Characterization of Solid Mining Waste, June, 2008. Rogers, T.H. and Armstrong, C.F., 1973. Environmental Geologic Analysis of the Monte Bello Ridge Mountain Study Area, Santa Clara County, California, California Division of Mines and Geology Preliminary Report 17. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB), 2007. Water quality monitoring and bioassessment in nine San Francisco Bay Region watersheds: Walker Creek, Lagunitas Creek, San Leandro Creek, Wildcat Creek/San Pablo Creek, Suisun Creek, Arroyo Las Positas, Pescadero Creek/Butano Creek, San Gregorio Creek, and Stevens Creek/Permanente Creek. Oakland, CA: Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), 2008. Groundwater Management December 2008 Groundwater Condition Report, December 2008. Smith, Kathleen S., 1999. Metal Sorption on Mineral Surfaces: An Overview with Examples Relating to Mineral Deposits. In G.S. Plumlee and M.J. Logsdon (Eds.), The Environmental Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits, Reviews in Economic Geology Volume 6A, pp. 161-182. Sorg, D.H., and McLaughlin, R.J., 1975. Geologic Map of the Sargent-Berrocal Fault Zone between Los Gatos and Los Altos Hills, Santa Clara County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-643, scale 1:24,000. Theis, C.V., 1935. The lowering of the piezometer surface and the rate and discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 16:519-24. URS, 2008. Final Report Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and 2008 Annual Storm Water Report. Prepared for Hanson Permanente Cement Company, Inc., June 2008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2004. US EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review Final. EPA 540-R-04-004, October 2004.
May 2010
55
063-7109
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region IX, 2007. Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories Table. June 2007. Vanderhurst, W., 1981. The Santa Clara Formation and Orogenesis of Monte Bello Ridge, 114 p. Wakabayashi, J., 1999. The Franciscan Complex, San Francisco Bay Area: a record of subduction complex processes, in Geologic field trips in northern California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication, vol. 119, p 1-21.
TABLES
May 2010
063-7109-500.4
TABLE 4.3 Summary of Hydraulic Properties from Packer Testing

Top (ft bgs) 121.7 0.7 Bottom (ft bgs) Interval Length (ft) Lithology Test Interval Transmissivity (ft2/d) Transmissivity (ft2/d) Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/d) Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/d)
Point ID
HG-2 312.1 2.0
HG-3 7.6 9.4 103.8 834.7 0.08 1.1 29.8 0.09
32.6 15.6 1.6 71.9 128.1 3.4 180.6
HG-4
HG-5
HG-8 66 94 28 834.7
505.35 463.9 421.9 379.9 400 358.9 295.89 274 211.89 337.9 253.9 149 86 7.6 6.1 3.3 9.4 94.4 29.81
554 492.6 450.6 408.6 453 387.6 324.56 296.6 240.56 366.5 283.6 178 115
48.65 28.7 28.7 28.7 53 28.7 28.67 22.6 28.67 28.6 29.7 29 29
0.67 0.54 0.06 2.51 2.42 0.12 6.30 <0.2 0.27 0.21 0.11 0.33 3.26
HG-9
Limestone Limestone Limestone Graywacke Greenstone Greenstone Limestone Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone Weathered Graywacke
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Phase 6\Redmond 111609\Hydrogeologic Report\Tables\Tables - Section 4_021910.xlsx
May 2010
063-7109-500.4
TABLE 4.4 Summary of Hydraulic Properties from Constant-Rate Pumping Test

Point ID Radius from Center of Pumping Well (feet) 0.1 0.1 0.1 7.0 625 625 850 850 Transmissivity (feet2/day) 2392 2584 2224 1,847 2,074 2224 2,059 2224 Storativity (dimensionless) ------0.887 0.0010 0.0026 0.0028 0.0093 Hydraulic Conductivity* (feet/day) 6.0 6.5 5.6 4.6 5.2 5.6 5.1 5.6 Analytical Solution
HG-10S HG-10INT GT4-25A GT3-4

Note:
Cooper-Jacob Straight Line (Drawdown) Cooper-Jacob Straight Line (Recovery) Theis Partial Penetration (AQTESOLV) Cooper-Jacob Straight Line (Drawdown) Cooper-Jacob Straight Line (Drawdown) Theis Partial Penetration (AQTESOLV) Cooper-Jacob Straight Line (Drawdown) Theis Partial Penetration (AQTESOLV)
* Hydraulic conductivity based on aquifer thickness of 400 feet from AQTESOLV analysis
May 2010
063-7109-500.4
TABLE 4.5 Los Altos Hills Station (LSA)

Nov 3.98 2.26 0.76 9.15 3.83 2.28 1.14 0.41 2.43 2.92 Dec 1.04 0.32 0.28 6.7 9.84 6.33 6.96 4.48 2.27 4.25 Jan 4.56 6.84 5.17 1.24 0.55 2.29 4.88 3.65 1.12 3.37 Precipitation in INCHES Feb Mar 5.65 3.11 10.54 1.99 7 2.01 1.59 1.84 2.75 1.28 5.83 0.53 4 3.24 2.51 7.77 10.4 4.32 5.59 2.90 Apr 0.7 1.26 0.73 0.43 5.49 0.03 2 4.18 0.28 1.68 May 0.02 0.54 0 0.85 0.58 0.08 1.26 0.59 0.25 0.46 Jun 0.16 0.18 0 0 0 0 0.32 0 0.04 0.08 Jul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0.00 Aug 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.01 Sep 0.19 0.06 0.12 0 0 0 0.05 0 0.12 0.06 Annual 20.02 24.23 19.78 22.01 24.32 17.42 26.4 23.71 21.88 22.20
WY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2009 Average
Oct 0.61 0.23 3.71 0.21 0 0.05 2.55 0.09 0.55 0.89
May 2010
063-7109-500.4
TABLE 4.6 Water Year 2009 Annual Water Balance Summary

Drainage Area Precipitation Evapotranspiration Runoff Baseflow Total Streamflow* Annual Average Runoff Annual Average Baseflow Units sq ft inches inches inches inches inches cfs gpm cfs gpm cfs gpm Permanente Creek MS-1 MS-2 28,845,896 74,349,225 21.9 13.8 4.2 3.9 8.1 0.32 143 0.30 133 0.62 276 21.9 15.0 1.6 5.2 6.8 0.32 144 1.02 459 1.34 603 Monte Bello Creek MS-3 MS-4 18,243,154 29,957,284 21.9 8.5 11.6 1.8 13.4 0.56 251 0.08 38 0.64 289 21.9 13.1 7.0 1.8 8.8 0.55 247 0.14 64 0.69 312
Annual Average Total Streamflow Note: * Total streamflow is the sum of runoff and baseflow.
May 2010
063-7109-500.4
TABLE 4.7 North Quarry Water Balance 2009
North Quarry
Precipitation
February 120,782 2.8 39.2 24,632 0.6 8.0 78,143 1.8 13.1 99,301 2.3 17.2 109,417 2.5 18.3 109,702 2.5 19.0 68,139 1.6 11.4 5,640 0.1 5.9 18,151 0.4 5.0 18,077 0.4 4.7 531,201 12.2 13.0
March 97,727 2.2 16.4
April 6,815 0.2 1.2
May 6,085 0.1 1.0
June 894 0.0 0.2
July 0 0.0 0.0
August 0 0.0 0.0
September 215 0.0 0.1
October 33,867 0.8 8.8
Total 266,384 6.1 6.5
Evaporation
Surface Runoff
Groundwater Inflow 1,003 863 950 709 566 714 236
1,298 Notes: gpm is the average flow rate in gallons per minute.
Units cu ft acre-ft gpm (ave) cu ft acre-ft gpm (ave) cu ft acre-ft gpm (ave) cu ft acre-ft gpm (ave) 1,787,546 41.0 300 5,983,579 137.4 585 115,859 2.7 20 4,983,218 114.4 103,446 2.4 17 5,670,036 130.2 16,551 0.4 3 4,095,389 94.0 0 0.0 0 3,374,523 77.5 0 0.0 0 686,736 15.8 12,414 0.3 3 863,506 19.8 1,862,027 42.7 484 2,251,850 51.7 7,729,481 177.4 189 31,906,266 732.5 778
3,831,638 88.0 1,244 3,997,430 91.8
February includes 16 days data; August includes 5 days of data; September includes 19 days of data; and October includes 20 days of data.
TABLE 5.6 (pg 1 of 4) Summary of Inflows in North Quarry

Month 1/1/2023 2/1/2023 3/1/2023 4/1/2023 5/1/2023 6/1/2023 7/1/2023 8/1/2023 9/1/2023 10/1/2023 11/1/2023 12/1/2023 1/1/2024 2/1/2024 3/1/2024 4/1/2024 5/1/2024 6/1/2024 7/1/2024 8/1/2024 9/1/2024 10/1/2024 11/1/2024 12/1/2024 1/1/2025 2/1/2025 3/1/2025 4/1/2025 5/1/2025 6/1/2025 7/1/2025 8/1/2025 9/1/2025 10/1/2025 11/1/2025 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 2/1/2026 3/1/2026 4/1/2026 5/1/2026 6/1/2026 7/1/2026 8/1/2026 9/1/2026 10/1/2026 11/1/2026 12/1/2026 1/1/2027 2/1/2027 3/1/2027 4/1/2027 5/1/2027 6/1/2027 7/1/2027 Precipitation (gpm) 8 18 11 7 3 1 0 0 0 7 25 38 31 60 36 21 6 1 0 0 1 12 41 60 48 81 42 25 7 1 0 0 1 16 53 78 63 105 55 32 9 2 0 0 1 18 60 87 71 120 64 37 10 2 0 Surface Runoff (gpm) 5 8 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 6 4 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 4 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 4 7 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 5 4 7 3 2 1 0 0 Groundwater Inflow (gpm) 371 352 337 323 315 310 302 297 292 286 281 276 270 268 263 260 257 255 249 247 244 241 239 236 233 231 228 226 223 220 218 215 215 212 210 210 207 204 202 199 199 196 194 194 191 191 188 188 186 183 181 181 178 178 175 Total Pit Inflow (gpm) 384 378 351 333 319 311 302 297 292 295 310 319 306 335 302 283 264 256 249 247 245 255 283 301 286 318 274 252 230 221 218 215 216 229 266 292 274 316 260 233 209 198 194 194 192 210 252 281 261 310 248 219 189 180 175



Month 10/1/2036 11/1/2036 12/1/2036 1/1/2037 2/1/2037 3/1/2037 4/1/2037 5/1/2037 6/1/2037 7/1/2037 8/1/2037 9/1/2037 10/1/2037 11/1/2037 12/1/2037 1/1/2038 2/1/2038 3/1/2038 4/1/2038 5/1/2038 6/1/2038 7/1/2038 8/1/2038 9/1/2038 10/1/2038 11/1/2038 12/1/2038 1/1/2039 2/1/2039 3/1/2039 4/1/2039 5/1/2039 6/1/2039 7/1/2039 8/1/2039 9/1/2039 Precipitation (gpm) 40 133 193 158 263 136 79 22 4 0 1 3 42 137 200 158 263 136 79 22 4 0 1 3 42 137 200 158 263 136 79 22 4 0 1 3 Surface Runoff (gpm) 1 3 4 3 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 Groundwater Inflow (gpm) 83 83 83 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Total Pit Inflow (gpm) 124 218 280 241 348 219 160 102 84 80 81 83 123 220 284 241 348 219 160 102 84 80 81 83 123 220 284 241 348 219 160 102 84 80 81 83 169 gpm
Annual Average Total Steady-State Inflow to North Quarry:
TABLE 5.7 (pg 1 of 2) Summary of Inflows in South Quarry

Month 1/1/2035 2/1/2035 3/1/2035 4/1/2035 5/1/2035 6/1/2035 7/1/2035 8/1/2035 9/1/2035 10/1/2035 11/1/2035 12/1/2035 1/1/2036 2/1/2036 3/1/2036 4/1/2036 5/1/2036 6/1/2036 7/1/2036 8/1/2036 9/1/2036 10/1/2036 11/1/2036 12/1/2036 1/1/2037 2/1/2037 3/1/2037 4/1/2037 5/1/2037 6/1/2037 7/1/2037 8/1/2037 9/1/2037 10/1/2037 11/1/2037 12/1/2037 1/1/2038 2/1/2038 3/1/2038 4/1/2038 5/1/2038 6/1/2038 7/1/2038 8/1/2038 9/1/2038 10/1/2038 11/1/2038 12/1/2038 1/1/2039 2/1/2039 3/1/2039 4/1/2039 5/1/2039 6/1/2039 7/1/2039 8/1/2039 9/1/2039 10/1/2039 11/1/2039 12/1/2039 1/1/2040 2/1/2040 3/1/2040 4/1/2040 5/1/2040 6/1/2040 Precipitation (gpm) 3 7 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 3 11 17 14 24 13 8 2 0 0 0 0 5 17 25 20 34 18 11 3 1 0 0 0 6 19 28 22 38 20 12 3 1 0 0 0 6 21 30 24 41 21 12 4 1 0 0 0 7 22 32 25 42 22 13 4 1 Surface Runoff (gpm) 5 8 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 5 4 6 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 5 2 1 0 0 Groundwater Inflow (gpm) 90 79 72 67 63 58 56 53 51 49 49 47 44 42 40 37 37 35 35 35 33 33 33 31 31 28 28 26 26 24 24 24 24 24 21 21 21 19 19 17 17 17 17 17 17 15 15 15 15 12 12 12 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Total Pit Inflow (gpm) 98 94 81 73 64 58 56 53 51 53 64 69 62 73 56 47 40 36 35 35 33 39 52 60 54 68 49 38 29 24 24 24 24 30 43 53 47 62 41 30 20 17 17 17 17 22 38 49 42 58 36 26 14 11 10 10 11 17 34 46 38 57 34 24 14 11
TABLE 5.7 (pg 2 of 2) Summary of Inflows in South Quarry

Month 7/1/2040 8/1/2040 9/1/2040 10/1/2040 11/1/2040 12/1/2040 1/1/2041 2/1/2041 3/1/2041 4/1/2041 5/1/2041 6/1/2041 7/1/2041 8/1/2041 9/1/2041 10/1/2041 11/1/2041 12/1/2041 1/1/2042 2/1/2042 3/1/2042 4/1/2042 5/1/2042 6/1/2042 7/1/2042 8/1/2042 9/1/2042 Precipitation (gpm) 0 0 0 7 22 32 25 42 22 13 4 1 0 0 0 7 22 32 25 42 22 13 4 1 0 0 0 Surface Runoff (gpm) 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Groundwater Inflow (gpm) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Total Pit Inflow (gpm) 10 10 11 17 34 46 38 57 34 24 14 11 10 10 11 17 34 46 38 57 34 24 14 11 10 10 11 26 gpm
Annual Average Total Steady-State Inflow to South Quarry:
May 2010
063-7109.500
TABLE 6.1 Groundwater Wells Completion Details and Sulfide Occurrence
Well
1,857 1,822 1,254 1,245 1,585 89 - 109 134 - 154 1,136 1,156 1,431 - 1,451 Weathered Graywacke Limestone 1,140 1,495 116 - 136 116 - 136 1,174 275 - 295 253 - 273 1,562 - 1,582 1,549 1,569 Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone /Graywacke 1,600 not noted on log
Ground Elevation (ft amsl) Screen Interval Geologic Unit

scattered pyrite (50 - 80 ft bgs) not noted on log not noted on log
Screen Interval (ft bgs)
Screen Interval (ft amsl)
Groundwater Elevation (ft amsl)
Sulfide Occurrence
HG-4 HG-6
HG-7
HG-9 HG-10S
(some) scattered pyrite (20 to 200 ft bgs) not noted on log
Geochem Tables
May 2010
063-7109.500
TABLE 6.2 Permanente Creek Stormwater Monitoring Locations
Station Name
SL-BG-CR SL-1-CR SL-4-CR SL-5-CR SL-5A-CR SL-11-CR Upstream of Ore Feeder and the Primary Crusher Downstream of Ponds 4A & 4B Inlet to Pond 13 Background - Upstream Permanente Creek Adjacent to West Material Stockpile Area (WMSA) Downstream of WMSA before concrete footing
Description
Geochem Tables
May2010 0637109.500
TABLE 6.3 Overburden (Waste Rock) and Ore Composite Samples
Sample ID
Sample Number
Boring Number
Approximate Sample Depth (feet)
General Rock Type
Composite 5
Metabasalt
4-20A-08-49 4-23B-08-322 GT1-4-08-80 4-20A-08-343 4-20A-08-348 4-24A-08-76
4-20A-08 4-23B-08 GT1-4-08 4-20A-08 4-20A-08 4-24A-08
49 322 80 343 348 76
Metabasalt Metabasalt Metabasalt Metabasalt Metabasalt Metabasalt
Composite 3
Fault Breccia
GT1-2-08-224 4-20A-08-345 4-28A-08-115
GT1-2-08 4-20A-08 4-28A-08
224 345 115
Undifferentiated Fault Breccia Undifferentiated Fault Breccia Undifferentiated Fault Breccia
Composite 4
Greenstone
4-27A-08-153 4-24A-08-74 4-20A-08-429
4-27A-08 4-24A-08 4-20A-08
153 74 429
Greenstone Greenstone Greenstone
Composite 1
Graywacke
4-23B-08-245 4-20A-08-94
4-23B-08 4-20A-08
245 94
Graywacke Graywacke
Composite 2
Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone
4-20A-08-437 4-27B-08-420 4-34A-08-153 GT3-4-08-353 GT1-2-08-213
4-20A-08 4-27B-08 4-34A-08 GT3-4-08 GT1-2-08
437 420 153 353 213
Limestone Limestone Limestone Limestone Chert
GT1-2-08-213
Chert
Source: Geocon Consultants, Inc.
May 2010
063-7109.500
TABLE 6.4 Summary of Geochemical Analyses
Analysis
Method
Analytes
Acid Base Accounting
Static Leach Test
Elemental Analysis
paste pH sulfur speciation - total, sulfate, pyritic and non-extractable EPA 600/2-78-054 neutralization potential (NP) metals - Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Se, Ag, Tl, V, Zn major ions - Ca, Mg, K, Na, Cl, SO 4 pH Modified WET alkalinity electrical conductivity Test (STLC) Total Concentrations (TTLC) metals - Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Ag, Tl, V, Zn
G:\Projects\063-7109 (Permanente Quarry)\hydrogeology\Report\Tables\ Geochem Tables
May 2010
063-7109.500
TABLE 6.5 Wall Washing Sampling Locations
Sample ID Lithology
> 5 years < 1 month fresh face 3.0 5.0 < 1 month fresh face 2 months south wall, bench 900 4.1 southwest corner of bench 900 southwest corner of bench 900 1.5 1.5 access road by office 3.5 1.7
Approximate Exposure Time Age of Face Location
Water Applied (L)
Water Collected (L)
Sample Area (m2)

0.69 0.79 0.80
GW-01
CT-01
GS-01
MG-01
1.5
0.77
HG-01
> 5 years
east wall, bench 850
3.5
1.5
0.76
HMG-01 -
1 year
south Wall, bench 950 -
3.7 -
1.5 -
0.69 -
FB-01
GRAYWACKE - light brown, highly weathered, fine-grained, no sulfides visible CHERT - reddish brown, some greenstone present, gouge zone, no sulfides visible GREENSTONE - dark greenish gray, very soft, slickenslides evident, gouge zone, no sulfides visible LIMESTONE - medium to high grade, light to dark gray, some oxidation present, no sulfides visible LIMESTONE - high grade, dark gray, interlayered with chert (gray), no sulfides visible, no evidence of oxidation LIMESTONE - light to dark gray, mixture of high and medium/low grade, oxidation present and silt/dust covering Equipment blank collected in field of spray bottle
G:\Projects\063-7109 (Permanente Quarry)\hydrogeology\Report\Tables\Geochem Tables
May2010 0637109.500
TABLE 6.6 Groundwater and Surface Water Quality Data Summary - Select Parameters
Average Concentrations Water Type TDS (mg/L)

1,220 470 537 470 370 1,110 903 353 23 <0.1 468 1.2 2.6 <0.7 578 3.6 0.7 0.9 3 0.6 13 30 36 30 <0.1 <0.1 0.9 <0.1 1 3 1 <0.5 45 323 7 43 605 <0.1 6 85 38 3 1 3 11 4 441 10
(a)
Monitor Location SO4 As (D) (g/L) (g/L) (g/L) Mn (D) Mo (D) (mg/L) (mg/L-N) NO3 Fall 2009
Na-SO4-HCO3 8.0 - 8.6 7.9 - 8.0 7.3 - 7.4 7.4 - 8.0 7.5 - 8.5 7.1 - 8.1 7.5 - 8.3 8.2 - 8.4 Mg-Ca-HCO3 Mg-Ca-HCO3 Ca-Mg-HCO3 Ca-Mg-HCO3 Ca-Mg-SO4 Ca-Mg-SO4-HCO3 Ca-Mg-HCO3
No. of Sampling Events pH (s.u.)

9 1 3 2 6 3 63 1
Ni (D) (g/L)
Se (D) (g/L)
1.4 <0.4 <0.4 0.6 1.6 7 62 0.4
Groundwater
HG-4
HG-6 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10S
4 3 4 2
Surface Water
SW-1
SW-2
SW-3
(a)
Average concentrations presented. Non-detect concentrations assumed equal to the detection limit in calculation of average.
(D) - dissolved phase
May 2010
063-7109.500
TABLE 6.7 Summary of Selected PER070 Water Quality Results

TDS (mg/L)
720 724 850
Date
Jun-02 Apr-02 Jan-03
Season
Dry Spring Wet
pH (s.u.)
8.2 8.3 7.5
SO4 (mg/L)
336 326 379
NO3 (mg/L-N)
1.5 2.1
Se (D) (g/L)
5.8 5.1 18.8
Ni (D) (g/L)
1.6 7.9 30.9
Source: SFBRWQCB, 2007
[File]
May2010 0637109.500
TABLE 6.8 Acid Base Accounting Results
CS-01
Composite # 1
Composite # 2
Sample Identification GT1-2-08-213 Composite # 3 Composite # 4
Composite # 5
Parameter
s.u. wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % kg CaCO3/t kg CaCO3/t kg CaCO3/t 7.34 0.01 23 <0.3 23 >77 8.00 0.32 0.08 0.12 0.12 62 3.8 58 17 8.39 0.18 <0.01 0.10 0.13 644 3.1 641 206 8.17 0.51 0.35 0.07 0.07 94 2.2 92 43 8.14 1.41 0.07 0.92 0.42 112 29 83 4 8.63 0.02 0.01 <0.01 0.01 205 <0.3 205 >656
Unit
Overburden Soil Graywacke Chert Fault Breccia Greenstone
Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone
Metabasalt
8.55 0.12 0.01 <0.01 0.17 867 <0.3 867 >2,774
Paste pH Sulfur - Total Sulfur - Sulfate Sulfur - Sulfide Sulfur - Non-Extractable Neutralization Potential (NP) Acid Potential (AP) NNP (NP - AP) NPR (NP/AP)
G:\Projects\063-7109 (Permanente Quarry)\hydrogeology\Report\Tables\ Geochem Tables
May 2010
063-7109.500
TABLE 6.9 Overburden (Waste Rock) and Ore Composite Samples - Drill Log Descriptions
Sample ID Drill Log Description
Sample Number
Boring Number
Approximate Sample Depth (Feet) General Rock Type Total S Sulfide S (%) (%)
49 Metabasalt
METABASALT: 35.6-55.0 feet; medium dark gray to dark gray to greenish gray; very fine-grained; scattered layers of greenstone up to 0.5 feet thick, abundant milky quartz veins with some calcite; core is highly fractured; some poorly-developed slickensides.
4-20A-08-49
4-20A-08
4-23B-08-322 Metabasalt
4-23B-08
322
METABASALT: 257.5-384.0 feet; medium dark gray to dark gray to greenish gray; bands of greenstone to 1.0 feet thick; bands of vesicular metabasalt with milky calcite-filled vesicles up to 2.0 feet thick; abundant milky calcite; scattered pyrite; some poorly-developed slickensides; scattered bands of brownish gray limestone to 0.3 feet thick; bands of soft fault gouge up to 3.0 feet thick; some heavily sheared bands up to 3.0 feet thick; a few scattered bands of iron-rich metabasalt to 0.4 feet thick.
Composite 5 GT1-4-08-80 Metabasalt GT1-4-08 80
Metabasalt
METABASALT: 71.2-127.4 feet; medium dark gray to dark gray with thin bands of grayish green greenstone; very fine-grained; abundant calcite veins and calcite filled vugs (vesicles?); numerous zones of fault breccia up to 1.0 foot thick - fault breccia consists of soft, clayey, very fine-grained fault gouge with clasts of metabasalt and some greenstone up to 2.0 inches across; some white to light gray chert.
0.12
<0.01
4-20A-08-343 Metabasalt Metabasalt Metabasalt 4-20A-08-348 4-24A-08-76 4-24A-08 76 4-20A-08 348
4-20A-08
343
FAULT BRECCIA: 325.4-345.6 feet; brownish gray to reddish brown to greenish gray; generally matrix supported with clasts up to 2.0 feet of hematite-rich metabasalt and greenstone; some well-developed slickensides; numerous milky calcite veins; some pyrite. METABASALT: 345.6-354.4 feet; medium dark gray to dark gray; highly sheared; thin bands of fault gouge up to 0.3 feet thick; some sheared greenstone. METABASALT: 75.1-88.6 feet; medium dark gray to pale reddish brown; reddish brown intervals are hematite-rich metabasalt; abundant milky calcite veins; thin (up to 4 inches) bands of fault gouge; some slickensides, trace pyrite.
GT1-2-08-224 4-20A-08-345 4-20A-08 345
GT1-2-08
224
Undifferentiated Fault FAULT BRECCIA: 221.4-225.8 feet; dark gray with grayish yellow greenstone. Breccia
FAULT BRECCIA: 325.4-345.6 feet; brownish gray to reddish brown to greenish gray; generally matrix
Composite 3 4-28A-08-115 4-28A-08 115
Fault Breccia
Undifferentiated Fault supported with clasts up to 2.0 feet of hematite-rich metabasalt and greenstone; some well-developed Breccia slickensides; numerous milky calcite veins; some pyrite.
1.41
0.92
Undifferentiated Fault composed of soft, clayey, very fine-grained fault gouge with clasts up to 1.0 inches across of metabasalt, Breccia greenstone, and some greywacke.
FAULT BRECCIA: 101.0-136.8 feet; medium gray to medium dark gray; matrix supported, matrix
4-27A-08-153 Greenstone
4-27A-08
153
Composite 4 4-24A-08-74 Greenstone 4-24A-08 74
Greenstone
0.02
<0.01
4-20A-08-429 Greenstone
4-20A-08
429
FAULT BRECCIA: 146.2-199.0 feet; medium dark gray to dark gray; matrix supported, matrix composed of soft, clayey fault gouge, clasts up to 1.0 inches across of metabasalt, some hematite-rich metabasalt, and some greenstone; some clasts of milky calcite. FAULT BRECCIA: 30.0-75.1 feet; dark yellowish orange to pale yellowish brown to medium gray to moderate greenish yellow; matrix supported, matrix composed of soft, clayey fault gouge with clasts up to 4 inches across of metabasalt, greywacke and greenstone with greenstone dominate from 73.4-75.1 feet; some very scattered milky calcite veins; some poorly- to well-developed slickensides; trace amounts of pyrite. GREENSTONE: 414.0-433.6 feet; greenish gray; highly fractured; numerous milky calcite veins; highly fractured; bands of fault gouge up to 1.0 feet thick; well-developed slickensides; some pyrite; highly fractured.
4-23B-08-245 Graywacke
4-23B-08
245
GRAYWACKE: 216.3-250.8 feet; medium gray to medium dark gray; very fine-grained; greenstone and metabasalt rock fragments to 2.0 mm; scattered pyrite; some milky calcite; a few bands of brownish gray limestone to 1.0 feet thick; a few poorly developed slickensides; core broken below 244.0 feet.
Composite 1 4-20A-08-94 4-20A-08 94
Graywacke Graywacke
GRAYWACKE: 79.0-104.0 feet; medium dark gray to dark gray with thin bands of greenish gray greenstone to 0.4 feet thick; numerous well developed slickensides coated with graphite; some milky calcite with minor quartz veining; highly fractured and sheared; core very broken; many fractures coated with moderate yellowish brown clay.
0.32
0.12
4-20A-08-437
4-20A-08
437
Limestone
LIMESTONE: 433.6-443.2 feet; medium gray; micritic; some forams and microfossils; scattered black chert, chert content estimated at 1-3%; calcite veins, a few slickensides.
4-27B-08-420
4-27B-08
420
Limestone
Composite 2
Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone 4-34A-08-153 GT3-4-08-353 Chert GT1-2-08-213 4-34A-08 GT3-4-08 GT1-2-08
LIMESTONE: 406.1-466.9 feet; light gray to medium gray; micritic; numerous stylolites; numerous thin bands of black limestone; a few forams and other microfossils; no visible pyrite; very scattered milky calcite; scattered black chert nodules, chert content estimated at 3-5%; a few thin (<6 inches) bands of fault gouge; a few brecciated bands; strong reaction to 10% HCl.
0.18
0.10
153 353 213
Limestone Limestone Chert
LIMESTONE: 153.7-174.2 feet; light gray; micritic; very abundant stylolites; some forams; no visible pyrite; bands of soft, clayey fault gouge to 0.3 feet thick; some thin fractures lined with light gray clay; some milky calcite veining; some dark gray to black chert nodules, chert content estimated at 5-8%; strong reaction to 10% HCl. LIMESTONE: 340.1-355.9 feet; brecciated and broken. CHERT: 212.8-221.4 feet; white, brecciated; some dolomitic limestone and medium gray chert clasts.
GT1-2-08-213
0.51
0.07
May2010
0637109.500
TABLE 6.10 Geologic Logs - Summary of Pyrite Occurrence
Log
GEO 2-1A-08 GEO 2-4A-07 GEO 2-4AA-07 GEO 2-6A-07 GEO 2-6B-07 GEO 2-10A-08 GEO 4-16A-08 GEO 4-18A-08
Pyrite Occurrence in Log Notes

None None None None None None LIMESTONE (256.0-361.7 feet) - scattered pyrite in fractures LIMESTONE (457.0 - 494.2 feet) - very scattered pyrite None METABASALT (281.6 - 303.0 feet) - some scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (303.0 - 325.4 feet) - some scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (325.4 - 345.6 feet) - some pyrite METABASALT (364.0 - 376.0 feet) - some pyrite GREENSTONE (414.0 - 433.6) - some pyrite GREENSTONE (142.9 - 198.2 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (50.0-105.5 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (105.5-116.2 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (116.2-163.9 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (163.9-184.5 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (184.5-198.4 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (198.4-238.4) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (238.4-263.7 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (263.7-285.6 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (296.4-317.5 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (317.5-323.4 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (330.1-342.2 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (353.5-384.5 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (384.5-393.4 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (393.4-479.3 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (479.3-496.0) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (77.0-119.0 feet) - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE (119.0-140.0 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (140.0-146.8 feet) - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE ( 146.8-216.3 feet) - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE (216.3-250.8 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (257.5-384.0 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (384.0-392.1 feet) - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE (392.1-432.2 feet) - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE (440.3-499.0 feet) - scattered pyrite. FAULT BRECCIA (30.0-75.1) - trace amounts of pyrite METABASALT (75.1-88.6 feet) - trace pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (92.3-115.3 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (115.3-137.4 feet) - some pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (137.4-151.7 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (151.7-172.9 feet) - some scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (172.9-197.2 feet) - scattered pyrite cubes to 5 mm across METABASALT (197.2-304.0 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (312.0-320.2 feet) - scattered milky calcite veining and pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (320.0-362.2 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (362.2-397.9 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (397.9-406.6 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (412.8-468.1 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (468.1-481.7 feet) - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE (486.7-500.2 feet) - scattered pyrite.
GEO 4-20A-08 GEO 4-22A-08
GEO 4-23A-08
GEO 4-23B-08
GEO 4-24A-08
February2010
0637109.500
GEO 4-26A-08 GEO 4-27A-08
GEO 4-27B-08 GEO 4-28A-08
GEO 4-31A-08
GEO 4-31B-08
GEO 4-34A-08
GEO 4-35A-08
GEO 4-38A-08
FAULT BRECCIA (148.3-177.8 feet) - some pyrite GREENSTONE (177.8-186.8 feet) - some pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (186.8-214.4 feet) - some pyrite METABASALT (214.4-269.0 feet) - some pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (269.0-288.2 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (288.2-308.7 feet) - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (315.3-340.4 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (340.4-352.3 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (360.7-387.0 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (393.2-418.8 feet) - scattered pyrite METABASALT (418.8-434.1 feet) - some pyrite GREENSTONE (434.1-459.8 feet) - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE (459.8-468.6 feet) - some pyrite FAULT BRECCIA (680.1-698.0 feet) - framboidal pyrite at limestone/fault breccia contact, scattered pyrite elsewhere. METABASALT: 232.8-248.0 feet - trace pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 248.0-308.9 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 84.0-155.3 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 167.4-191.6 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 195.0-230.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 230.0-261.5 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 261.5-306.5 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 316.0-329.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 349.8-368.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 368.0-406.1 - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 281.3-289.8 feet - some pyrite cubes to 1/4 inch GREENSTONE: 20.0-159.0 feet - scattered FAULT BRECCIA: 159.0-175.0 feet - scattered GREENSTONE: 175.0-199.6 feet - scattered FAULT BRECCIA: 199.6-246.7 feet - scattered GREENSTONE: 256.2-268.0 feet - scattered FAULT BRECCIA: 558.0-593.5 feet - some scattered METABASALT: 36.0-120.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 120.0-174.4 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 174.4-183.1 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 183.1-222.0 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 222.0-266.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 266.4-284.2 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 284.2-293.1 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 293.1-338.6 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 338.6-350.0 feet - scattered pyrite WEATHERED FAULT BRECCIA: 14.0-39.4 feet - some oxidized pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 80.0-111.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 111.0-133.4 feet - some scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 133.4-153.7 feet - scattered pyrite WEATHERED METABASALT: 19.0-62.0 feet - scattered pyrite and oxidized pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 62.0-172.2 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 172.2-247.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 247.0-286.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 286.6-463.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 40.0-119.8 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 119.8-224.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 224.0-241.5 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 241.5-338.5 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 343.8-444.7 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 456.0-535.3 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 535.3-543.8 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 543.8-581.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 581.0-651.0 feet - some scattered pyrite
February2010
GRAYWACKE: 80.0-91.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 155.7-186.5 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 186.5-210.9 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 210.9-394.4 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 394.4-424.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 424.0-440.6 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 440.6-554.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 554.4-619.0 feet - scattered pyrite None FAULT BRECCIA: 50.0-86.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 534.8-572.0 feet - scattered pyrite None None None None FAULT BRECCIA: 112.5-123.0 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 129.0-146.8 feet - some scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 146.8-207.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 223.6-235.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 235.6-269.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 273.3-348.5 feet - scattered pyrite None None None DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE: 357.6-367.8 feet - scattered METABASALT: 375.4-427.0 feet some pyrite filled fractures GRAYWACKE: 435.4-449.0 feet - abundant pyrite GRAYWACKE: 456.0-463.0 feet - pyrite GREENSTONE: 520.8-527.2 feet - some pyrite LIMESTONE: 534.0-549.0 feet - some scattered pyrite None None GRAYWACKE: 300.9-310.6 feet - pyrite None FAULT BRECCIA: 128.5-166.3 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 166.3-217.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 217.6-252.7 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 252.7-276.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 276.4-293.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 293.0-356.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 356.4-374.4 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 374.4-421.4 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 425.9-441.4 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 457.7-498.0 feet - scattered pyrite WEATHERED GREENSTONE: 116.3-144.5 feet - scattered pyrite WEATHERED GREENSTONE: 151.0-190.4 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 195.2-221.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 221.4-247.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 247.6-304.5 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 304.5-320.5 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 320.5-374.5 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 374.5-383.9 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 395.8-426.9 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 429.4-500.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 198.7-286.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 286.0-363.0 feet- some scattered pyrite METABASALT: 363.0-384.8 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 384.8-401.8 feet - scattered pyrite LIMESTONE: 401.8-454.4 feet - some scattered pyrite LIMESTONE: 569.4-593.0 feet - scattered pyrite DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE: 598.7-622.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 622.0-640.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 673.2-713.0 feet - scattered pyrite
0637109.500
GEO 4-38B-08 GEO 4-40A-08 GEO 4-41B-08 GT 1-1-08 GT 1-2-08 GT 1-3-08 GT 1-4-08
GT 2-1A-08 GT 2-7-07 GT 3-2A-08 GT 3-3A-08
GT 3-3B-08 GT 3-4-08 GT 3-4A-08 GT 4-25A-08 GT 4-25B-08
GT 4-29A-08
GT 4-29B-08
GT 4-30A-08
February2010
0637109.500
FAULT BRECCIA: 128.3-174.9 feet - some scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 174.9-186.5 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 186.5-223.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 228.5-299.4 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 299.4-337.7 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 337.5-363.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 363.0-461.8 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 461.8-487.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 487.0-526.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 530.9-569.5 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 569.5-584.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 584.6-613.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 613.0-623.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 623.0-639.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 639.0-683.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 73.0-161.8 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 161.8-178.8 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 178.8-253.5 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 253.5-269.3 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 269.3-392.5 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 392.5-495.3 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 495.3-516.5 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 559.0-577.0 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 577.0-599.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 599.4-614.4 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 621.8-654.3 feet - scattered pyrite METABASALT: 654.4-700.0 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 95.0-133.0 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 133.0-138.6 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 138.6-217.5 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 217.5-236.8 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 236.8-260.5 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 260.5-302.8 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 302.8-323.2 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 323.2-435.3 feet - scattered pyrite FAULT BRECCIA: 435.3-469.3 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 476.0-698.0 feet - scattered pyrite GRAYWACKE: 360.0-420.0 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 50.0-300.0 feet - scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 30.0-400.0 feet - scattered pyrite WEATHERED GRAYWACKE: 20.0-120.0 feet - some scattered pyrite GREENSTONE: 120.0-200.0 feet - scattered pyrite None None LIMESTONE: 161.4-208.6 feet - scattered wide pyrite veins up to 1/2 inch in width, pyrite estimated at <1.0% LIMESTONE: 385.0-542.0 feet - scattered pyrite LIMESTONE: 180.3-304.7 feet - a few scattered grains of pyrite are present but pyrite total is <0.1% LIMESTONE: 304.7-366.0 feet - some scattered pyrite, pyrite <0.1% many fractures and joint surfaces coated with grayish orange clay LIMESTONE: 395.4-625.0 feet - very scattered grains of pyrite, pyrite content <0.1% None None
GT 4-30B-08
GT 4-33A-08
GT 4-33B-08 HG 2 HG 4 HG 5 HG 9 P2-03-07 P2-7-07 P2-11-07 P2-11A-07
P2-11B-07 RH 1-1-08 RH 1-2-08
May2010 0637109.500
TABLE 6.11 Overburden and Ore - TTLC and STLC Results
CS-01
Composite 1
Composite 2
GT1-2-08-213
Composite 3
Composite 4
Composite 5
Top Soil Detection Limit

B,H
Graywacke Result Q
(b)
Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone Chert Result Q

(b)
Fault Breccia Result Q

(b)
Greenstone Result Q
(b)
Metabasalt Result Q
(b)
Parameter
Unit
PQL
Result Result Q
Q (b)
(b)
J J J J
B J J B J J J J B J B J J B J B,J J J J
B J
J J J J J J
J J J
pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 oC) Total Alkalinity Antimony Aluminum Arsenic Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chloride Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Sulfate Thallium Vanadium Zinc Dissolved Non-Volatile Organic Carbon J B J J
(a) (a)
Sb Al As Ba Be B Cd Ca Cl Cr Co Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Hg Mo Ni K Se Ag Na SO4 Tl V Zn
s.u. umhos/cm mg/L as CaCO3 mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L J
0.05 1 4.1 0.00017 0.038 0.00052 0.00012 0.00018 0.0097 0.00013 0.016 0.059 0.00055 0.000033 0.00068 0.0093 0.000054 0.029 0.00011/0.0025 (c) 0.000016 0.00013 0.00015 0.074 0.00038 0.000065 0.12 0.21 0.00011 0.0012 0.0019 0.31
0.05 1 4.1 0.002 1 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.1 0.001 0.1 0.5 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.5 0.001 0.05 0.001/0.1 (c) 0.01 0.001 0.002 1 0.002 0.001 0.5 1 0.001 0.003 0.005 5
7.63 140 70 0.00029 0.1 <0.00052 0.012 <0.00018 0.049 <0.00013 17 2.3 0.00098 0.00012 0.0025 0.16 0.000071 5.5 0.0034 0.00019 0.00085 0.002 5.5 <0.00038 <0.000065 2.6 1.3 <0.00011 0.0019 0.0093 8
8.11 160 37 0.0072 0.003 0.059 <0.00018 <0.00013 18 1.6 <0.00055 0.00029 0.0013 0.0012 4.3 0.0052 <0.000016 0.011 0.0017 3.7 <0.00038 <0.000065 8.8 22 <0.00011 0.0015 0.022 -
8.16 130 42 0.0015 0.0013 0.22 <0.00018 <0.00013 16 1.1 <0.00055 0.00015 <0.00068 0.00011 4.2 0.0025 0.00021 0.027 0.0017 2.8 0.006 <0.000065 4 12 <0.00011 <0.0012 0.0081 -
8.27 190 49 0.0032 0.0012 0.17 <0.00018 <0.00013 14 1.4 <0.00055 0.00025 0.0012 0.00012 14 0.0012 <0.000016 0.012 0.0032 2 <0.00038 <0.000065 2.7 29 <0.00011 <0.0012 0.037 -
8.24 160 56 0.0058 0.0062 0.12 <0.00018 <0.00013 13 1.3 <0.00055 0.00013 <0.00068 <0.000054 6.8 0.0075 <0.000016 0.0073 0.002 3.9 <0.00038 <0.000065 7.9 16 <0.00011 0.012 0.011 -
8.29 160 76 0.00098 0.0027 0.037 <0.00018 <0.00013 17 2 0.0019 0.00034 <0.00068 <0.000054 8.3 0.003 <0.000016 0.0023 0.0081 0.96 <0.00038 <0.000065 5.9 3 <0.00011 0.018 0.011 -
8.36 130 46 0.0085 0.0073 0.12 <0.00018 <0.00013 11 1.3 <0.00055 0.0001 <0.00068 0.000092 5.4 0.0031 <0.000016 0.028 0.00089 4.1 0.00058 <0.000065 6.6 8.8 <0.00011 0.0049 0.01 -
J J
J B,J
J B,J
J B,J
J B
J J J J
J B
J J
Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc 3.7 <0.71 77 0.068 0.12 120 29 63 3.4 0.078 <0.18 73 3.3 <0.086 <0.94 120 51 B B B <1.7 5.1 60 0.17 0.071 95 20 50 9.7 0.033 0.22 120 10 <0.086 <0.94 64 250 6.5 8.4 800 0.3 0.068 29 21 56 6.8 0.15 2.3 120 8.5 0.63 <0.94 15 67
Sb As Ba Be Cd Cr Co Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Ag Tl V Zn
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1.7 0.71 (a) 0.13 (a) 0.026 (a) 0.033 (a) 0.045 (a) 0.18 (a) 0.13 (a) 0.59 (a) 0.014 0.18 (a) 0.12 (a) 0.76 (a) 0.086 (a) 0.94 (a) 0.062 (a) 0.25 (a) 5 1 (a) 0.5 (a) 0.5 (a) 0.5 (a) 0.5 (a) 2.5 (a) 1 (a) 2.5 (a) 0.16 2.5 (a) 0.5 (a) 1 (a) 0.5 (a) 5 (a) 0.5 (a) 2.5 (a)
5.3 5.7 560 0.11 0.15 6.6 8.4 27 2 <0.014 0.74 220 2.4 <0.086 <0.94 5.9 150
J J B B
4.2 2.4 180 <0.026 <0.033 260 34 56 8.3 0.053 <0.18 250 15 0.13 0.97 75 75
<17 <7.1 46 <0.26 <0.33 400 93 45 <5.9 <0.014 <1.8 1200 15 <0.86 <9.4 53 64
<1.7 4.8 110 0.032 <0.033 110 26 62 11 <0.014 1 100 13 0.16 <0.94 70 71
Notes: PQL - practical quantitation limit (a) Composite 4 sample detection limit or PQL is 10x higher (raised due to matrix interference). (b) Laboratory qualifiers: B - constituent detected in method blank J - estimated value H - holding time exceeded (c) Higher MDL and PQL for CS-01 sample.
May2010 0637109.500
TABLE 6.12 Wall Washing Results
Age
s.u. S/cm C mg/L 7.87 137 16.43 7.42 -32.7 6.94 283 18.6 6.57 70.0 7.53 42 13.78 7.95 11.4 7.53 78 17.35 8.03 92.8 7.32 46 11.91 16.5 25.1
Limestone High Grade HG-01 11/24/2009 > 5 years Q Graywacke GW-01 11/24/2009 > 5 years Q Q Q Q Q
8.95 94 18.36 7.4 73.7
Limestone med to high MG-01 11/24/2009 2 months Chert CT-01 11/24/2009 < 1 month Greenstone GS-01 11/24/2009 < 1 month
Limestone high and med/low HMG-01 11/24/2009 1 year
FB-01 11/24/2009 Q
Field Parameters
pH Specific Conductance Temperature Dissolved Oxygen ORP
Lab Parameters
J+
B J J
Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Hexavalent Chromium Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Chromium Copper Iron Lead Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silicon as SiO 2 Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Total Recoverable Aluminum Total Recoverable Antimony Total Recoverable Arsenic Total Recoverable Barium Total Recoverable Beryllium Total Recoverable Boron Total Recoverable Cadmium Total Recoverable Chromium Total Recoverable Copper
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L 220 0.56 J 20 0.75 J 79 <0.18 19 J 0.2 J 0.81 J 2.1 130 0.063 J 19 98 9.9 49 1900 <0.065 <0.11 44 23 46 1.7 1.6 0.43 J, J+ 40000 7.7 J 88 7900 B <4.0 36 J 45 490 420 1800 0.43 J 33 <0.70 150 <0.18 28 J <0.13 <0.55 2.1 720 0.29 J 8.6 2.6 1.7 J, J+ <0.38 10000 <0.065 0.22 J 2.9 J 7.5 J+ 7.8 6.1 4.2 1.2 77000 <4.0 80 2800 B 6.7 J 33 J 14 J 120 160 59 <0.17 21 <0.70 83 <0.18 14 J <0.13 <0.55 <0.68 11 J <0.054 2.6 6.7 0.91 J, J+ 14 810 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 3.6 J, J+ 31 2.2 1.2 0.21 J, J+ 28000 6.8 J 81 B 13000 <4.0 86 J 6.6 J 63 370 1400 <0.17 16 0.9 520 <0.18 52 <0.13 3.6 <0.68 1400 <0.054 7.9 1.4 5.9 <0.38 12000 <0.065 <0.11 7.3 6.6 17 6.6 6.1 1.8 960000 <4.0 <22 12000 36 160 5.7 7000 2000
220 0.18 J 22 <0.70 180 <0.18 24 J <0.13 <0.55 0.86 J 160 0.065 J 1.2 14 4.9 0.7 J 3700 <0.065 <0.11 6.3 16 J+ 34 2.6 2.3 0.85 J, J+ 1800000 <20 290 140000 B 92 J 650 J 680 4500 17000
650 <0.17 12 <0.70 660 <0.18 52 J <0.13 2.6 J 1.1 J 970 <0.054 11 0.37 J 3.5 <0.38 8000 <0.065 <0.11 39 5.8 J+ 21 3.1 7.3 0.86 J, J+ 990000 <4.0 <22 23000 B 30 230 5.1 J 7100 3100
<38 <0.17 <0.52 <0.70 1.2 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 <0.55 <0.68 <9.3 <0.054 <0.11 <0.13 0.18 <0.38 <65 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 2 0.14 <0.029 <0.12 0.099 <38 <0.20 <1.1 0.69 <0.20 <12 <0.11 <0.64 <0.66
B,J
May2010 0637109.500
TABLE 6.12 Wall Washing Results
Age
B B B B J B J J J J
Limestone High Grade HG-01 11/24/2009 > 5 years Q Graywacke GW-01 11/24/2009 > 5 years Q Q Q Q Q
J B
Limestone med to high MG-01 11/24/2009 2 months Chert CT-01 11/24/2009 < 1 month Greenstone GS-01 11/24/2009 < 1 month
Limestone high and med/low HMG-01 11/24/2009 1 year
FB-01 11/24/2009 Q
B,J
J J J
Total Recoverable Iron Total Recoverable Lead Total Recoverable Manganese Total Recoverable Mercury Total Recoverable Molybdenum Total Recoverable Nickel Total Recoverable Selenium Total Recoverable Silver Total Recoverable Thallium Total Recoverable Vanadium Total Recoverable Zinc Total Recoverable Calcium Total Recoverable Magnesium Total Recoverable Sodium Total Recoverable Potassium J J
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 83000 25 2000 <0.016 320 1300 230 5.4 4.3 960 3300 1000 67 3.6 4.1 100000 130 3000 0.032 16 210 <11 2 <2.2 230 460 180 44 4.2 13 69000 43 7200 <0.016 23 1100 60 3.4 <2.2 220 700 3100 68 3.9 4 1100000 27 22000 <0.016 <4.6 9300 <11 <1.8 <2.2 <100 2800 2300 1600 5.4 14 2400000 1300 56000 0.032 <23 150000 160 <8.8 57 2100 390000 33000 1700 8.5 64
940000 15 44000 <0.016 <4.6 5800 <11 <1.8 <2.2 <52 2100 1500 1700 5.6 4.2
<30 <0.19 0.63 <0.016 <0.23 0.84 <0.54 <0.088 <0.11 <2.6 4.6 0.18 <0.038 <0.070 <0.092
Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO 3) Chloride Fluoride Nitrate as N Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO 3) 25 <2.5 20 0.95 0.34 0.28 100 120 H H H 50 <2.5 41 1.3 1.3 0.31 4.9 45 24 <2.5 20 0.97 0.46 1.4 61 86
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
68 <2.5 56 1.3 2.4 0.49 2.6 69 H
41 <2.5 33 1.4 0.86 12 15 96 H
57 <2.5 47 0.44 1.2 6.7 3.3 64
<5.0 <2.5 <4.1 <0.059 <0.010 <0.026 <0.21 0.43 H
J H
pH Electrical Conductivity @ 25 C Total Dissolved Solids @ 180 C Total Suspended Solids (Glass Fiber) Turbidity Residual Chlorine Ammonia as N Nitrite as N Total Phosphorus H J J H J
H J
H J
pH Units umhos/cm mg/L mg/L NT Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
8.06 259 110 540 850 <0.10 0.038 0.012 4.1
7.89 101 61 3400 1600 <0.20 0.22 0.015 2.2
7.95 199 65 4800 2500 <0.10 0.025 <0.0081 3.7
8.16 135 67 35000 28000 <0.50 0.84 0.049 91
8.09 222 91 68000 44000 <0.10 0.16 <0.0081 140
8.24 160 100 50000 23000 <0.50 4.9 0.12 100
5.81 2.2 <6.7 <4.0 0.31 <0.10 <0.025 <0.0081 <0.016
Notes: Q - Laboratory qualifiers B - constituent detected in method blank J - estimated value H - holding time exceeded J+ - qualitifed as biased high due to detection in field blank.
FIGURES

SAN FRANCISCO BAY
LEHIGH PROPERTY BOUNDARY
C
San Jose
A L IF O R N
SITE
IA
PA C I F I C OCEAN
0 50 100
G:\GIS\Sites\Lehigh_Permanente_Quarry\mxd\SiteLocationMap.mxd
Los Angeles
Miles
REFERENCES
PROJECT
2.5
5 Miles
10
15
Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 StatePlane California III FIPS 0403 feet Aerial background: http://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/services 1) ESRI_ShadedRelief_World_2D 2) 13_Imagery_Prime_World_2D
TITLE
REGIONAL LOCATION MAP

PROJECT No. DESIGN GIS CHECK REVIEW DLM DLM GW BF 063-7109 1/28/2010 1/28/2010 1/28/2010 1/28/2010 FILE No. SCALE: AS SHOWN REV. 0
FIGURE 1.1
RECLAM ATIO
NDARY N PLAN BO U
WEST MATERIALS STORAGE AREA (WMSA) NORTH QUARRY CENTRAL MATERIALS STORAGE AREA (CMSA) EAST MATERIALS STORAGE AREA (EMSA) ALUMINUM PLANT CEMENT PLANT
R PE M EN AN TE C E RE K
CITY OF CUPERTINO
SOUTH QUARRY
AGG PLANT TOPSOIL STORAGE AREA
M O NT EB EL LO
CR E
EK
PROJECT
LEGEND
0 600 1,200 Feet 2,400
TITLE
Disturbance Area Boundary
REFERENCES
PROJECT OVERVIEW
PROJECT No. DESIGN GIS CHECK REVIEW DLM DLM GW WLF 063-7109 2/1/2012 2/1/2012 2/1/2012 2/1/2012 FILE No. SCALE: AS SHOWN REV. 0
G:\GIS\Sites\Lehigh_Permanente_Quarry\mxd\RP_Project_Overview.mxd
Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 StatePlane California III FIPS 0403 feet Aerial background: http://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/services (13_Imagery_Prime_World_2D)
FIGURE 1.2
WEST MATERIALS STORAGE AREA (WMSA)
NORTH QUARRY CENTRAL MATERIALS STORAGE AREA (CMSA) EAST MATERIALS STORAGE AREA (EMSA)
SOUTH QUARRY TOPSOIL STORAGE AREA
LEGEND
PROJECT
Reclamation Plan Boundary Lehigh Property Boundary 0 500 1,000 Feet 1,500 2,000
TITLE
REFERENCES
FINAL RECLAMATION PLAN

G:\GIS\Sites\Lehigh_Permanente_Quarry\mxd\RP_WC_ultimate
From Enviromine (2010). Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 StatePlane California III FIPS 0403 Feet
FIGURE 1.3
( !
( !
El Granada
ALAMEDACOUNTY SANTACLARACOUNTY
( ! ( !
Atherton
SAN FRANCISCO B AY
Half Moon Bay
( !
Woodside
( !
West Menlo Park
( ! ( ! ( !
Ladera Los Altos Hills
SAN MATEO COUNTY

Portola Valley
Sky Londa
( !
SAN TA CLARA VAL L E Y

San Jose
( !
Los Trancos Woods
San Gregorio Monta Vista

( ! ( ! ( !
( !
PA C I F I C OCEAN
Cupertino
Redwood Terrace
( !
La Honda
( !
S A N T A
( !
Loma Mar
( !
Pescadero
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Boulder Creek
R U Z M
( !
Monte Sereno
O U N T A IN S
( !
Lexington Hills
( !
LEGEND
( !
PROJECT
Facility boundary
TITLE
REFERENCES
5 Miles
( ! ( !
10
REGIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SETTING

G:\GIS\Sites\Lehigh_Permanente_Quarry\mxd\RP_regional_relief
ESRI:World_Shaded_Relief (http://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/services) Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 StatePlane California III FIPS 0403 Feet
FIGURE 2.1
( !
15 00
00 16
00 12
15 00
10 00
16 00
1000
1000
00 11
1200
0 110
0 110
00 10
0 120
00 11
160 0
120 0
160 0
1100
120 0
150 0
1300
11 00
0 110
100 0
11 00
150 0
14 00
12 00
0 110
1400
11 00
10 00
1500
00 14
1000
100 0
1500
170 0
130 0
110 0
120 0
110 0 0 110
10 00
17 00
16 00
140 0
00 14
18 00
13 00
130 0 130 0
15 00
1200
0 100
1300
1200
140 0
150 0
1400
00 13
00 12
150 0
130 0
11 00
AN
1600
1500
EN
TE
160 0
14 00
1600
170 0
17 00
150 0
15 00
150 0
12 00
1400
140 0
00 13
10 00
18 00
18 00
160 0
15 00
1600
EE
160 0
1100
11 00
19 00
1400
1200
19 00
17 00
170 0
20 00
180 0
0 170
18 00
0 170
1500
12 00
120 0
20 00
0 180
100 0
210 0
20 00
170 0
180 0
180 0
11 00
00 21
170 0
150 0
19 00
0 180
180 0
160 0
1000
18 00
210 0
200 0
1100
120 0
00 13
2100
0 170
21 00
0 140
220 0
22 00
230 0
19 00
150 0
160 0
2300
00 21
150 0
0 160
20 00
M160 O0 NT
00 17
17 00
180 0
16 00
130 0
100 0
00 19
120 0
15 00
1400
00 13
00 11
110 0
00 13
110 0
00 14
100 0
140 0
00 14
0 110
130 0
00 20
R PE
00 10
C R
240 0
210 0
00 25
150 0
180 0
K
130 0
150 0
14 00
150 0
150 0
0 200
190 0
1500
150 0
15 00
14 00
130 0
1200
130 0
16 00
1300
1300
Miles
170 0
16 00
170 0
1300
LEGEND
180 0
REFERENCES
Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 StatePlane California III FIPS 0403 Feet
110 0
14 00
PROJECT
Facility boundary South Quarry 0
TITLE
500 Feet
1,000
1,500
LOCAL TOPOGRAPHIC SETTING

110 0
1200
130 0
G:\GIS\Sites\Lehigh_Permanente_Quarry\mxd\H_well_map
0 200
00 13
00 16
00 19
00 14
00 18
00 17
E BE LL O CR
160 0
100 0
00 18
2400
0 150
140 0
120 0
1300
110 0
230 0
22 00
20 00
EE
00 14
00 16
0 190
Area of Large Map

130 0
00 16
1400
0 240
150 0
140 0
130 0
100 0
00 15
00 15
120 0
110 0
00 16
0 140
15 00
00 14
13 00
00 12
120 0
00 11
100 0
0 100
13 00
120 0
00 14
1400
00 15
150 0
160 0
15 00
150 0
0 110 00 10
00 13
00 14
0.5
12 00
110 0
1500
00 14
00 14
00 11
00 14
FIGURE 2.2
LEHIGH PROPERTY BOUNDARY
G:\GIS\Sites\Lehigh_Permanente_Quarry\mxd\RP_RegionalLocationMap.mxd
SAN FRANCISCO BAY

0 0.5 Miles
PROJECT
REFERENCES
US Geological Survey, Geologic Map and Map Database of the Palo Alto 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California; Brabb, E.E., R.W.Graymer, and D.L., Jones, 2000. MF Studies Map MF2332. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/2000/mf-2332/mf2332m.pdf)
HYDROLOGIC INVESTIGATION PERMANENTE QUARRY RECLAMATION PLAN UPDATA SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TITLE
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP

FIGURE 2.3
Kvfs Kg sz sz QTsc
QTsc sz QTsc
Ks
Kg ls Kls Kls ls Kg Kg Kls Kv QTsc Ks QTsc Kls Ks sz sz Kg
Ks/Kg
Kls Kls Ks Ks/Kg
Kg Kls sz sz/Kv
QTsc
sz
INDEX MAP SHOWING SOURCES OF DATA
sz
Ks/Kg
1 3
Kv
QTsc
INSERT OVERSIZE 1 of 1
sz sz
0 Feet
250 500
1,000
sz Kls sz
See Notes for the key to data sources.
PROJECT
LEGEND
NOTES
Ks REFERENCES
Topography (2007, 2008, 2009 composite; Chang Consultants (2010). Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 StatePlane California III FIPS 0403 Feet
TITLE
Rock Type (Surpac Model):
Geologic contact, certain Geologic contact, approximate Geologic contact, concealed Landslide
GEOLOGIC COMPILATION MAP

PROJECT No. DESIGN GIS CHECK REVIEW DLM DLM WLF XXX 063-7109 10/27/2008 10/27/2008 10/27/2008 10/27/2008 FILE No. SCALE: AS SHOWN REV. 0
Map Document: 00_Hanson_BASEMAP_SEPT2009.mxd / Modified 9/18/2009 2:49:53 PM / Plotted 11/11/2009 11:39:31 AM by DMason
Fault breccia/metabasalt (sz/Kv) Graywacke (Ks) Graywacke/greenstone (Ks/Kg) Greenstone (Kg) Greenstone/metabasalt (Kg) Limestone (Kls)
Rock Type (Fouria, simplified): Landslide (ls) Greenstone; all types Limestone; all types Metabasalts Alteration
1) Modified after Rogers, T.H. and Armstrong, C.F., CDMG Preliminary Report 17 (1973) and Fouria, J. Geology of the Pemanente Limestone and Agrregate Quarry (2004). 2) Fouria, J. Geology of the Pemanente Limestone and Agrregate Quarry (2004). 3) Modified after Rogers, T.H. and Armstrong, C.F (1973). 4) Gemcom SURPAC results of geologic model. 5) Modified after Rogers, T.H. and Armstrong, C.F (1973).
FIGURE 2.4
A'
SECTION A-A'
B'
SECTION LOCATIONS
LEGEND
NOTES
SECTION B-B'
B'
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTIONS A-A' AND B-B'
FIGURE 2.5
Palo Alto
S A N TA C L A R A S A N TA C L A R A COUNTY COUNTY
Mountain View
Be
Sunnyvale
rro ca l fau lt
Sa
An dr ea s
SITE
fa ul tz
M on
ta
Cupertino
Vi s ta -S
on e
ha nn on
fa
Be rro
S A N M AT E O S A N M AT E O COUNTY COUNTY
G:\Projects\063-7109 (Hanson Permanente Quarry\GIS\Hanson_geotectonic_map_20Mar2009.mxd
ul t
zo ne
l ca fa ul t
0
Legend
Stream Fault (surface expression): Certain Concealed Inferred Thrust (teeth in dip direction) Dashed where approx., querried where uncertain; dotted where concealed.
TITLE REV. DATE DES PROJECT
1
Sa n
2 Miles
REVISION DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED RECLAMATION PLAN EAST MATERIALS STORAGE AREA HANSON PERMANENTE CEMENT, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL GEOTECTONIC SETTING
PROJECT No. DESIGN DLM DLM WLF WLF 063-7109 3/13/2009 3/13/2009 3/25/2009 3/25/2009 FILE No. SCALE: AS SHOWN REV. 0
s ea dr An
GIS
CHK
RVW
ul fa
tz
e on
Fault source: Brabb, et. al. (2000) Faults discussed in text have heavier line weight.
GIS CHECK
Sunnyvale, CA
REVIEW
FIGURE 3
1599.8
114 0 .4 113 7 .8 114 8 .7 119 6 .5 10 94 .5 1116 .4 110 5 .6 114 2 .8 118 2 .7 118 3 .9 117 7 .5 116 4 .0 118 4 .6 12 03 .7 12 10 .9 12 13 .6 12 32 .7 90 3 .4 88 4 .8 73 9 .2 75 0 .8 71 2.8 75 2 .5 69 3 .4 64 2 .2 68 7 .8 64 9 .6 60 5 .7 58 4 .1 53 5 .1 53 4 .8 53 4 .5 55 6 .2 52 1.0 53 4 .3 55 6 .2 55 7 .9 65 3 .7 60 9 .2 60 8 .5 64 5 .7 59 5 .0 63 5 .9 57 4 .0 59 1.6 63 8 .7 57 5 .8 57 3 .0 56 8 .0 56 4 .4 56 6 .8 55 7 .4 CB 57 0 .9 55 9 .5 56 2 .1 56 9 .4 55 6 .7 57 1.0 57 0 .1 57 3 .9 57 1.3 56 8 .6 55 6 .1 56 5 .7 55 7 .0 53 4 .7 55 6 .3 55 5 .9 51 4.9 69 3 .3 64 6 .0 68 4 .1 68 4 .7 55 5 .3 51 2.7 69 0 .8 67 6 .3 WL 70 6 .8 10 57 .6 68 7 .7 73 3 .7 68 5 .9 55 5 .5 12 05 .5 68 5 .9 69 2 .9 68 5 .0 70 1.3 113 5 .2 12 24 .3 10 91 .5 113 8 .2 118 0 .2 12 35 .0 113 5 .2
12 96 .3
15
60
1589.1
90
15 26 .3
13 93 .1
12 86 .7 71 2.8
119 3 .8
11
90
10 64 .4 76 7 .2 64 2 .7
10 46 .3 69 5 .0
69 1.8 69 8 .9
70 5 .5
11
15 20
114 2 .0 118 6 .8
15 90
114
15 65 .2
15 55 .9
15 44 .4 118 3 .3 12 13 .2 112 5 .8 113 5 .7 10 97 .6 10 96 .9 10 97 .9 10 61 .5 10 42 .2 10 53 .2 10 34 .0 10 17 .8 10 37 .3
15 51 .2
90
13 92 .3
114 2 .0
10
15 40
10 54 .4 76 4 .2 73 1.8 72 9 .3 71 5.3 69 6 .0 64 2 .0 57 3 .1 57 3 .1 59 68 6 .9 65 6 .8 72 3 .7 69 4 .1 71 6.1 69 4 .3 57 5 .7 66 1.8 68 5 .9 68 7 .0 66 2 .2 85 0 .2 70 5 .8 65 9 .0 69 5 .8 65 6 .9 66 0 .8 66 6 .8 57 6 .7 57 3 .8 56 9 .4 57 8 .6 57 9 .4 59 2 .3 59 9 .3 59 9 .7 60 3 .5 60 3 .9 58 6 .8 58 5 .1 58 5 .0 57 4 .3 57 3 .4 57 3 .4 57 3 .9 59 7 .8 57 3 .8 56 5 .3 57 0 .3 66 8 .1 65 8 .5 66 7 .8 68 4 .5 67 8 .6 10 43 .3 77 3 .6 98 1.5 81 4.4 66 5 .9 66 6 .0 77 2 .3 69 5 .4 69 6 .2 68 8 .6 60 3 .0 60 1.9 60 1.0 67 3 .9 66 9 .1 66 8 .6 59 1.5 72 9 .3 69 1.6 59 9 .6 88 0 .4 97 2 .8 96 0 .2 72 6 .3 87 6 .0 77 2 .4 81 2.3 59 8 .4 66 6 .6 59 8 .5 66 5 .7 66 1.7 66 7 .7 65 7 .7 66 0 .8 65 9 .6 64 0 .0 66 2 .1 65 9 .7 66 4 .6 57 3 .2 71 5.4 69 4 .6
15 29 .8
15 26 .1
13 23 .3
12 94 .0
119 3 .3
12 96 .5 117 6 .6 116 6 .6 114 5 .7
# *
64 0
84
113 4 .0 115 6 .1
14 80
0
15 79 .2
14 84 .5
15
14
90
113 6 .9 113 8 .0 1113 .0 10 78 .6 10 66 .8 10 83 .6 10 01 .2 110 2 .8 10 91 .1 10 93 .5 110 6 .3 110 3 .7 10 45 .2 10 28 .8 10 18 .810 36 .9 10 60 .8 10 54 .5 94 8 .6 85 2 .7 95 2 .8 10 76 .5 10 35 .6 99 9 .1 10 42 .410 40 10 41 .7 10 38 .9 99 7 .8 99 4 .6 10 33 .9 10 39 .8 10 02 .3 10 32 .5 10 38 .1 10 85 .2 10 00 .2 99 9 .8 10 84 .0 10 84 .1 10 79 .0
10 40
40
1118 .5 10 77 .5 10 68 .9 10 43 .4 10 53 .5 10 44 .2 93 5 .6 10 93 .7
69
14
114 0
10
10 84 .9 10 63 .6 10 66 .1 110 3 .4 94 9 .9 92 7 .5 10 86 .8 10 24 .7 96 6 .8 10 55 .9 96 3 .4 96 7 .8
0
SW-1
10
10 95 .5
20
110 8 .0 10 89 .3 10 13 .3 92 3 .3 75 5 .0 73 5 .7 55 6 .6 72 6 .8 72 5 .3 71 7.8
14
40
Dense Trees
10 40
114 6 .7 10 61 .3 116 7 .8 10 99 .4 10 68 .3 10 64 .9 10 32 .5
14 60
79
10 91 .6
00
14 40
15 88 .6
15 86 .7
15 16 .3
14 87 .3
12 94 .8
12 84 .4
119 7 .9 114 0 .9 112 5 .2 116 4 .4
118 7 .3 10 94 .7 10 57 .3 91 4.4 74 7 .5 76 5 .0 72 5 .7
99
89
72 8 .8
15 00
114 2 .4 118 3 .4 10 96 .0 10 60 .6
10 95 .8 10 33 .0
14 07 .2
12 92 .1 118 9 .5
113 8 .8
94
90 6 .0
13
10 90
0
72 7 .8 72 7 .0
80
14
00
51 8.9
51 7.2
90
13
18 80
119 5 .6 11
9 0
19 00
118 1.6 113 9 .1 10 30 .1 10 33 .1 10 30 .4 10 71 .2 10 45 .4 99 4 .2 98 6 .9 119 7 .0 114 8 .1 99 7 .8
10 90
15 00
113 7 .1 113 7 .6 10 40 .8 10 63 .9 114 9 .1
14 60 14 80
11 40
113 8 .2 10 77 .4 10 56 .1 10 81 .3 113 5 .2 10 61 .3 10 94 .0
" )
74 0
54
10 90
10 74 .0 10 78 .1
13
40
14 20
15 88 .5
15 87 .7
15 16 .6
14 89 .5
13 01 .5
13 07 .8
12 75 .5
51 9.3 51 9.3 52 2 .9 52 3 .4 52 2 .0
51 7.2
19 20
10 90
110 5 .0 93 .2 10 10 99 .4
90
19
60
15 60
119 3 .7 12 52 .2 10 39 .3 10 40
40
15
19
80
15 80
MS-1
55 6 .1 55 5 .6 55 5 .3 55 3 .7 12 15 .0 12 04 .1 115 5 .2 114 5 .7
15
60
15 89 .9
15
15 17 .7
14 92 .7
14 90
19 40
15 40
1009 1587. 83
245 1587. 80
15 89 .9
13 17 .2
12 90 .7
12 65 .1
15 88 .6
Dense Trees
13
Ro
90
20
20
16 20
16 00
14 40
20 00
15 94 .6
Un
pa
ve
15 22 .9
12 99 .1
12 93 .2 12 90 .5 12 92 .8
12 55 .7
53 1.0 52 5 .6 52 7 .2 52 6 .0 52 7 .9 52 4 .1
40
20
90
12
15 20
16 60
20
94 0
10 65 .7 93 9 .4 10 29 .1 10 23 .1 10 29 .4 10 25 .6 10 45 .2 10 39 .0 10 39 .7 84 8 .9 98 7 .2 10 45 .6 10 55 .1 10 05 .3 10 03 .2
15 26 .7
15 26 .2
14 97 .1
13
40
16 40
ad
14 95 .0
12 92 .9
13 02 .5
13 03 .1
12 92 .7
12 63 .4
53 1.9 55 6 .2 52 9 .5 52 7 .6 55 4 .4 53 3 .1
15 00
60
5-6
17 00
168 0
15 04 .8
99 0
10 40
110 5 .9
20
17
80
17
20
15 05 .3
GROUN D O B S CU RE D B Y DEN S E TR EE S
17 60
40
53 0 .4 55 7 .5 53 4 .7 53 2 .6
21
00
17
80
! /
89 0
55 8 .8 WL 85 1.8 81 9.0 84 8 .4 86 0 .5 72 1.1 96 1.9 87 2 .3 89 5 .1 10 06 .4 72 3 .3 96 0 .8 82 3 .0
53 7 .0
3-5
13
14
12 20
00
80
14 80
14 60
14
60
14
40
14
20
14
00
0 124 12 60 12 80
13
13
80
13 00 0 132
60
40
20
00
20
60
20
99 0
20
00
40
40
20
80
60
14 40
13
60
Dense Trees
GT1-4
Dense Trees
12 20
11 20
80 3 .7 80 8 .6
12 00
55 6 .5
55 4 .5
53 8 .4 53 4 .0 53 3 .7
55 5 .2 PILE 57 2 .5 58 4 .4 PILE 55 2 .8 55 4 .3 55 0 .7 53 5 .3 53 8 .8 55 6 .9 55 4 .4 55 3 .7
13
11 80
40
80
80
17
16
17
17
13 40 60 13
16
16
20
16
15
80
40
16
60
17
80
19
00
60
19
14 00
14
14
14
14 40 14 60 14 80
40
18
13 00
80
12 80
12 00
Dense Trees
12 60
94 0
12 40
13 80
690
64 0
73 7 .0
14
14
19
13
00
20
00
0
15
15
15
142 0
40
40
15
20
60
13
59
40
66 8 .9 66 9 .1
14 20
13
13
00
12
20
13
12
60
12
80
13
00
13
20
20
1400
13
40
13
60
80
13 40
18
20
18
13 20
60
114 0
114 0
80 3 .0 80 6 .4 80 4 .0 80 5 .9 80 0 .9 80 2 .3 79 7 .8 80 9 .9
84 0
13
00
13 60
15
15
18
21 40
00
18
17
13 20
80
13 20
1537.9
13 40
118 0
130 0
80 8 .9 80 5 .4 80 2 .2 99 0 .2 99 6 .4 WL 74 4 .6 96 3 .7 73 3 .6 73 6 .0 87 3 .4
116 0
80 4 .4
89 0
96 2 .6 68 3 .0
13 00
12
13 60
80
12 00
Dense Trees
72 0
116 0
86 1.9
62 0
! /
79 0
61 5.1
59 8 .7
550.5 552.7
55 0
551.2
55 0
13 40
20
00
59 4 .5
64 0
66 0
13 80
1220
118
00
132 0
12 80
! /
14 00
14 20
10
10
Dense Trees
10
ER
13 60
60
14 80
13 40
20
13
00
HG-7 ! P
12 40
12
78 5 .1
HG-8
C onvey or Water L evel 733.9' 745.2
66 0
74 0
706.6 C onvey or 651.0
652.0
Pipe
62
550.8 Pile
0 64 0
14 40 14 60
12 60
20
13
40
14 80
14 00
12
15 20
15 00
14 20
13 00
114 0
40
15 00
92 0
15 40
13 20
0
HG-2
40
Dense Trees
90 0
90
86 0 88 0
Dense Trees
82 0
0 80
78 0
76 0
74 0
Pipe
70 0
71 1.2 Pipe 68 0 71 1.5
652.9 C onvey or Pipes 633.1
552.2 555.5 552.3 567.0 Pile 568.6 Dense Trees 556.9 709.4
56
60
13
14 40
15 60
15 20
14 60
15 80
AN
15 40
14 80
16 20
15 00
Dense Trees
16 40
13
60
16 00
13 40
12
116 0
84 0
92 0
94 0
13 60
80
13
15 60
00
15 20
16 60
13 80
! /
13 80
12 80
11 80
96 0
90 0
C onvey or 738.4 71 0.9
C onvey or
14 00
14 20
14 40
13
13 20
00
10 00
88 0
98 0
15 40
14 20
15 80
15 60
12
Dense Trees
10 20
0
82 0
0
0 86
16 80
86
14 00
78
00
84 0
80 0
14
14 60
80
66
TE N E
10 40
60
16
0
58
60
170 0
60
17
17
40
15
80
19 20
17
17
0
1600
72
GT3-4
15
80 0
15
80
HG-11
15 20
74
0 156
70
10
70
110 0
82
00
18
19 60
19 80
EE
18
20
18
16
18
20
20
20
20
80
60
40
18
60
40
20
18
18
19
00
80
18
40
164 0
16 20
78 0
16 40
14 00
HG-1
0
16 00
12 00
11 40
118 0
820
11 20
80 0
76 0
74 0
72
70 0
20
116 0
00
15
40
00
!! PP !! /P
0
15 80
13 80
00
114 0
11
Dense Trees
798.7
78 0
74
40
60
80
0
16
Dense Trees
68
112 0
Dense Trees
84
798.3
76 0
00
15 80
HG-10M
76
15
60
15
40
10 80
74
80
798.4
80 0
78 0
673.8
205 807. 52
693.3 807.8
0
Dense Trees 665.7

68 0
66 0
! /
HG-10S
16 60
14 20
84 0
20
12 60
10 60
82
17
0
15 60
40
808.4
80
Pile
78
00
16 80
60
10
621.8
17
15 40
13
76 0
80
20
800.8
58
16
15
740
16 60
60
12 40
709.6
693.9
72 0
60
14
15 20
00
15 00
70
15
68
40
16 40
16
40
00
71 0.3
66
14
15
80
0 0
68
64
1480
0
78
62
20
14
0 122
561.6
0
Pile
0
64
Dense Trees
60
16 20
16
20
88
14 80
84 0
82
Dense Trees
70
16 00
14
14
805.8
694.6
62
13 40
16 00
15 80
144 0
558.6
0
60
801.8
55 0
55
13 80
HG-3
00
10
12 80
12
2
84 0
11
20
11 0
10 80
79 7 .8
82 0
80 0
76 0
580.4
550.7 571.0
571.7
71 7.7
94 0
667.1
21
00
18
60
18
21
20
80
16
16 80
17 00
16
74
72 0
20
12 20
00
19
16
19
20
16
0 168
60
40
16 60
70
14 40
257 10053 679. 93 680. 03
16 20
76
0
0
0
720
70 0
625.4
68 0
16 40
14 60
C onvey or
68 0
578.3
594.8
19
17 20
40
17
80
00
16 60
14 80
116 0
68 0
15 00
15 20
631.5
66 0
19
17 40
506 1858. 86
60
17 00
17
17 60
19
80
17
20
17
17 80
18 00
40
Dense Trees
17 20
16 11 80
80
12 40
17
00
! /
639.2
GT4-25A
! HG-9 P
12 60
60
17
12 00
78
76
20
72
20
18
17 80
ad
! P HG-4
Dense Trees
12
15 60
17
40
00
17
60
17 40
15 40
Dense Trees Dense Trees

20
74
20
20
19
19
80
13
Un pa ve d Ro
20
20
40
20
40
20
00
19
40
20
17 60
18
20
00
17
80
18 20
80
Dense Trees
13
Dense Trees
20
18
18
40
18
00
18 40
13
18 60
17 80
15 80
12
SW-2
80
0
0
70
0
66
66
640
620
60
82
0
66 0
#" *)
MS-2
Dense Trees
68 0
Dense Trees
60 0
62
Dense Trees 61 8.6 670.1 671.6

68 0 Piles
84 0
72
20 6 0
80
20 6 0
19
14
18 00
17 80
20 8
00
21 00
0
14
17
40
20 8 0
19
00
Dense Trees
18 20
16 40
19
20
12 00
118 0
92
90
60
10
80
21
20
21
16 60
15 60
60
40
17 60
00
20
80
2040
20
10 80
17 60
112 0
20
0
80
16
0
178 0
18
17 00
18 00
60
15 40
10 60
182 0
10
ve d
Ro a d
17
40
15 20
11
11
20
512 1870. 98
20
Un pa
17
2
10
17 40 17 20
10
21 40
10
18
17
20
15 00
40
60
17 00
20
18 40
80
00
21
19
116 0
98
21 20
00
40
60
18 60
14
! HG-6 P
16 00
16 60
20
14
18 40
114 0
168 0
14 60
96 0
98 0 10 00
94 0
673.9 Dense Trees C onvey or

72 0
74 0
643.4
70
634.9 652.7
0
628.7 636.3 644.8 659.2 C onvey or

76
80 0
78 0
66
68
18
13
652.9
80
86 0 88 0
20 4
18
60
18
20
18
13
18
40
40
Dense Trees
60
656.4
61 4.3
621.5
62 0
61 8.6 61 8.1
20
18 00
16 20
Dense Trees
70
74
76
78
80
82
64 0
84
86
0
10 20
66 0
642.8
0 78 0
658.7 C onvey or 672.4 675.6 Piles

68 0
658.2
66 0 68 0
1816.7 1785.6
10 60
110 0
10 40
22
20 2 0
19
00
18
40
17
68 0
12 60
86 0
80
21 00
78
Dense Trees
20
20
21 60
Dense Trees
00
17
13 20
21 20
21 00
00
17
15 20
60
1821 .5
13
12 20
12 40
12 60
70
683.2
86 0
90 0
72 0
13
70
21 80
00
14 60
14 80
15 00
21 80
226
80
22
22
16 60
22
16 40
0
15 20
40
20
15 40
00
15 60
80
23
00
21 40
19
23
16
16 80
40
60
17 20
23
20
21
20
20
19
60
M O
13
80
Dense Trees
16
17 40
13 60
17
17 80
94
80
00
16
80
17 60
686.6
96
78
21
22 8 0
20
19
40
16
15
16 00
00
60
13 20
19
20
16 20
76 0
21
21
40
22 4 0
22 6 0
00
21
60
19
00
18
80
18
60
16
40
16 40
20
17
20
18 00
80
Dense Trees
13 00
Dense Trees
92
74 0
21
20
22 2 0
Ro a d
21 66.9
00
14
Un pa ve
16 60
d Ro a d
Un pa ve d
16
14
16 60
16 40
16
20
16
00
80
12 80
Dense Trees
692.3
72
21
22 0 0
16 80
40
17
15
15
60
60
21 40
40
154 0
664.9
78
98
10
10 00
0
70
Pylon
0
0
807.6
22 8 0
23
Dense Trees
16
16
15 80
74
18
78
20
14 00
80
00
60
10 11 00 80
30057 1330. 86
23 2 0
00
17
10
777.3
0
79
80
13 80
80
40
23
0 166
40
83 0
820
10
81
20
23 0 0
60
21
00
15 00
16
40
801.9
20
76
20
23 4 0
24 0 0
24 0 0
24
15
14 20
6
Ro a d
14 80
0
16 40
16 60
EL
15
16 80
16 60
15 20
00
1683.7
ve d
Un pa
12
12
12
60
20
12
00
74
23 8 0
112 0 114 0 116 0 11 80
770.3
40
! /
14 40
72 0
30043 781.39
Dense Trees 782.9

74
75
24
23 6 0
24 2
2086.6
60 15 40
76
NT EB
HG-5
16 20
77
Piles
73
1314.3
72
40
779.9
78
78 0
24 2 0
21
14
16
20
16 00
14 60
2021.7 Dense Trees

16 40
20
60
24 4 0
21
60
24 8 0
15
25 2 0
15 40
15 20
80
40
19
14 20
20
Dense Trees
15 20
15
40 15
3-8
80 14 00
3-7
15 00
25
21
60
20
40
80
40
00
23
23
20
00
14
15 80
Un pa
3-6
23
40
22
80
18
15 60
40
15 40
22
00
80
156 0
! /
12
21
15 80
16 00
60
24 6 0
21
40
60
20
40
LO CR EE
60
Dense Trees
13 00
76 0
74 0
783.6
78 0
80 0
76
74
ve d
25 00
2503.4
22
22
20
20
82 0
84 0
Ro a
22
80
20
20
19
00
12 80
GT2-7
12
13 00
12 90
1268.6
80 0
782.8
74 0
12
60
86 0
46 843. 53
76 0 78 0
18
60
Un
80
21 40
80
88
Piles
0
0
0
689.9
0
76 0
pa
21 20
20 8 0
Dense Trees
17
12
12 00
87 0
ve
17
118 0
86
68
659.2
76 0
Dense Trees
82
18 40
20
20
20
24 80
90
25 2 0
25
00
Dense Trees
13 80
14
60
15 40
19
60
18 20
K
15 00
80
12
12 60 70
12
50
12
50
88 0
1489.6
98
96
25 4 0
10
20
15 20
24 6 0
14 80
3-9
2545.2
13 40
24 4 0
15 00
13 20
1940
14 60
18 00
13
Dense Trees
13 10
17 80
13 20
13 30
00
10
3-1 0
40
10
10 80
10
10
0
20
60
94 0
92 0 90 0
80 0
82 0
00
72
84
110 0
24 2 0
19 20
17 60
14
15
0 152
0 86
112 0
68
20
00
19 00
17 40
Dense Trees
134 0
11 40
13 00
18 80
15
15 00
15 00
15
15 20
40
88
11 60
3-1 1 4-2
18 60
17 20
00
12 80
13
20
1292.9
13
13
118 0
92
90
14 80
14 80
15 00
1527.6
14
94
12 00
80
12 20
0
60
13
Dense Trees
00
64
00
13 40
16
20
20
96 0
14 00
80 14
14 40
14 20
15
16
00
14 20
Dense Trees
14
15
1304.1
60
98 0
13 00
Dense Trees
14 60
12 60
14 40
14
60
14
2-8
1300.9
14 20
12 40
1299.9
40
13
1306.1
00
12 80
12 60
Pylon
62
12 80
1118.8
40
13 20
80
82 0
15
15 60
94 0
80
13 80
78
76
0
74
0
14
60
14
15 00
80
60
13 20
14 00
40
80
15
15
20
13 00
60
1297.9
80
15
1110
15 20
13 40
13 60
15
15
40
Dense Trees
14
15
80
00
1285.5
14
60
14
20
40
14
14
14
15
20
00
40
80
15
60
14
14
40
80
13
15
16
13
20
12 80
40
15
60
40
12 40
14 20
13
13
13
13 00
13 20
12 00
13 40
12 20
15
60
1620.1
15
00
15 60
12 60
12 60
14
80
00
12 80
13
20
14
12
40
15
13 80
60
13 40
13 00
16
00
40
15 60
12 80
15
1105.7
12
80
00
11
0
10 80
1587.8
12 60
12 40
11
80 11 60
10 40
10
10 60
118 0
13 20 13 00 12 80
14
00
12 20
98
10
20
00
! (
13 60
15 40
15 60
20
11
Ro a
Dense Trees
14 60
15 00
11
10
00 80
14
ve d
# * ) "
14 40
14 80
12 00
80
13 00 12 80 12 60 12 40 12 20
14 80
10
60
96
Un pa
94
118 0
150 0
Dense Trees
14 60
14
60
10
40
10
20
92
10
00
98
92
90
154 0
15 20
14 40
86
15 20
30143 2170. 09
30145 2162. 70
15 60
15 80
15 40
Dense Trees
13
14
20
60
12 20
00
12
80
11
11 60
40 11
112 0
84
116 0 114 0
14
15 00
20 14
14 80
88
40
828.2
83
91 6.2
0
110 0
142 0
880.8 827.7
14
00 14
900.1 989.1
82
78
66 0
76
00
74
827.4
13
14 60
80
0
16 00
14 40
13
164 0
15
13
! P
14
60
# * ) "
00
80
40 80
15
40
! / ! ! ! ! / / P/ ! ! P P ! !! / // ! P
13
12
! P
00
14 60
11
11
80
80
826.4 Dense Trees

13 80
13 60
13 40
14
30056 990. 81
86
0
84
72
70
68 0
16 20
13 00
16 80
20
10
12 20
14
13 20
80
12 40
16
16 40
00
12 60
16
15
12 80
16 60
80
80
15 60
15
20
00
40
14
40
14
11
14 80
60
11
40
14 20
11
112 0
C onvey ors 903.3

90 0
990.4 900.6 899.6

98 0
96 0 94 0 92 0
897.6
98
96
0
94
92
! /
17 00
17 20
13 00
902.1
60
900.4
14
0 128
! /
16 60
16 80
17 00
13
00
113 0
14
898.9
80
60
12 40
13
Pylon
17 40
17 60
17 80
12 60
60
134 0
897.4 894.9
13 20
1220
118 0
14 40
1140
0 112
10 80
10 60
72
70
94 0
68
15
11
20
94
20
Dense Trees
0
66
14 20
13
40
00
" )
14 40
14
64
13
60
13
20
80
11
00
14 00
14
13
15
20
1202.4
15
11
62
13 80
MS-3
15 40
12
20
0 120
0
98
18 00
17 20
20
114 0
110
108 0 10 60
10 40
114 0
110 0
) "
18 20
18 40
18
1200
116 0
112 0
14
892.9
14
13
0
00
13
893.9
10 40
74
87
892.2
80
11
0
50
0
100 0
) "
17 40
60
13
60
10 20
Dense Trees
40
1149.6
806.1
86 0
98 0
892.4 890.7
13
10 20
13
76
18 80
94
# *
19 00
17 60
19 20
14 40
Dense Trees
96
20
00
14 20
92
803.6
90
80
14 00
88 0 86 0 84 0
82
12
85 0
C onvey or
78
888.2
0
80 0
Dense Trees
12
82
13 80
0 178
14 60
14 80
15 00
12
12
96
40
20
13 60
84 0
13 40
88 0
MS-4
10
20
18 20
20
00
20
15 40 15 60
15 20
12
00
13 00
18 40
" )
10
11
12 80
20 40
12 60
797.7
12 40 12 20
82
833.4
0
833.4 832.4
11
10
00
94
19
86 0
886.2 830.4
13 20
60
92 0
0
84 0
18 00
800.4
83 0
84 0
Pylon
88 0
86 0
88 0
830.9
6
20
830.9
0
11
40
92
86
12 00
118 0
81 0
18 60
0
20 60
0.5
15 80
20 80
16 00
16 20
1
21 00
92 0
90 0
Un pa ve d
80
20
20 6 0
80
Dense Trees
82
Dense Trees
80
84
84 0
60
Ro
67 0
74 0
78
0
72 0
23 80
20 8 0
66 0
76
20 4 0
00
116 0
84
82
0
659.2
ad
23 60
657.1
0
72 0
70 0
68 0
23 40
18
20 6 0
20 2 0
74
84
23 20
17 80
20
114 0
82
72 0
40
86 0
C onvey ors
704.7 72
0
70 0
68 0
66 0
23 00
22
80
20 4 0
20 0 0
80 0
687.3
70
60
19 80
66 0
22
40
20
20
17
668.7 669.2 C onvey or
685.8
60
19
40
18
702.9
54
68 0
15 20
13 04 .3
40
52 9 .1
13
80
60
12
15
80
15
40
14
80
14
60
14
40
19
19
20
20
20
60
80
00
21
13
00
17 40 17 60
80 0
12 60
10
60
78 0
124 0
96
10
10 80
86
17 20
12 20
823.0
82 0
78 0
Miles
17 00
80 16
16 60
10
80
81 4.8
0
84 0
21
14
80
14
20
00
20
14
14
60
80
13
13
20
60
13
80
15
20
88
86
0
0
14
80
17
72 0
20
17
40
19
15
20
17
80
LEGEND
20
17
15
60
Pylon
00
15
80
16
00
18
80
19
00
19
60
19
80
13
14
80
17
20
00
20
17
20
17
17
17
60
80
18
00
18
40
20
24
24
24
40
23
20
23
00
14 20
14
6
13 20
0
13
13
70 0
66 0
50
72 0
70
84 0
86 0
88 0
0
68 0
66 0
90 0
92 0
64 0
94 0
10 20
10 00
0
96
96 0
12
13
12
14
20
60
40
90 0
88 0
0 90
20
00
10
70 0
88 0
86 0
84 0
82 0
Dense Trees
98 0
19 40
16 40
60
19 80
Ro a d
10
40
10 60
116
84
80
114
11 0 0
2 0 11
12 00
11
80
11
11
60
0
40
11
11
80
84
20
82 0
112 0
92
00
110 0
79 0
81 4.8 81 3.8
98
82 0
90
21 20
18
80 0
88 0
40
10 60
1280
13 00
13 20
10
20
10 40
77 0
81 2.6
94 0
10 00
10 20
78 0
30111 2186. 39
18 80
18 60
18 40
20
1780
18 00
18 20
SW-3
13 40
13 60
980 Dense Trees
10 00
96 0
77
98 0
84 0
0
96 0
94 0
92 0
76 0
760
86
0
84 0
82 0
80 0
80 0
19 40
19 20
18 40
19 00
Dense Trees
# *
94 0
REFERENCES
PROJECT
92 0
82 0
78
Dense Trees
0
78
! P
Groundwater monitor well
! Hydrogeology borehole (
0
TITLE
! / Borehole with transducer

500 1,000 Feet 1,500
# *
MONITORING LOCATIONS
Surface water sample location " Surface water station ) Facility boundary
FIGURE 3.1
1800
1700
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000 9/10
Pumping Test End GT4-25A HG-7 MW
8/31
9/20
9/30
10/10
10/20
10/30
Pumping Test Start HG-10 D VWT HG-6 MW
Date
HG-10 S PW GT3-4 HG-9 MW
HG-10 INT VWT HG-4 MW
Title Project Name Client Name
Groundwater Levels
Hydrologic Investigation Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Update
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.1
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Phase 6\Redmond 111609\Hydrogeologic Report\Figures\Supporting Files\Section 4 - ALL FIGURES_040710dh.xlsx
-1
Relative Water Level Change (feet)
7 9/26 10/1 10/6 10/11 10/16 10/21 10/26
9/16
9/21
Date
HG-10 S PW
HG-10 INT VWT
HG-10 D VWT
GT4-25A
GT3-4
HG-4 MW
HG-6 MW
HG-7 MW
HG-9 MW Drawn
DH
Relative Groundwater Changes

Project No. Date
Checked
SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.2
Recovery
10 Pumping Rate (Q) = 48 gpm Drawdown per log cycle: 0.7 ft Transmissivity (T) = 2600 ft^2/day
Cooper-Jacob Straight-Line Method Analysis Period: 10 to 100 t/t'
15
Drawdown (feet)
20
25
Drawdown
Cooper-Jacob Straight-Line Method
Analysis Period: 100 to 200 minutes
30
Pumping Rate (Q) = 48 gpm
Drawdown per log cycle: 0.7 ft
Transmissivity (T) = 2400 ft^2/day
35 1 10 100 1,000 10,000
t (minutes) and t/t' (dimensionless)

HG-10S Drawdown and Recovery Semi-Log Plot

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH
MPK
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.3
Section 4 - ALL FIGURES_040710dh.xlsx
100
Pumping rate adjustment
10
Boundary Dominated Flow
Wellbore Storage
1 1
2
Break in slope at approximately 5 minutes of pumping Partial Penetration
Drawdown (feet)
0.1
HG-10s PW - Corrected Drawdown
HG-10s PW - Derivative Drawdown
HG-10s PW - Derivative Recovery
0.01 0 1 10 100 1,000 10,000
Elapsed pumping time (minutes)

HG-10S Drawdown and Recovery Derivative Log-Log Plot

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH
MPK
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.4
0 0.0
Drawdown corrected for groundwater level trend
2 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

Uncorrected drawdown Drawdown corrected for groundwater level trend
8
Uncorrected drawdown
Drawdown (feet)
Drawdown (feet) 2.5
10
12
14
3.5 100 1000 Elapsed Time (minutes)
Legend
HG-10int VWT 7 feet from HG-10S PW
3.0
GT4-25a 625 feet from HG-10S PW
10
10000
10
100
1000
10000
Elapsed Time (minutes)
0.0
0.5
Drawdown corrected for groundwater level trend Uncorrected drawdown
Cooper-Jacob Straight-Line Analysis HG-10INT VWT GT3-4 GT4-25A

Cooper-Jacob Straight-Line Analysis Results HG-10INT VWT T = 1,847 ft2/d S = 0.9 GT3-4 T = 2,059 ft2/d S = 3 x10-3
Drawdown (feet)
1.0
1.5
GT3-4 850 feet from HG-10S PW
2.0 100 1000 Elapsed Time (minutes)

10
10000
GT4-25A T = 2,074 ft2/d S = 1 x10-3 Drawn Checked

DH
Corrected Drawdown Hydrographs for Observation Wells

Project No. Date
MPK
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.5
100
10
Drawdown (feet)
0.1
Parameters Solution: Theis (partial penetration) T = 2,224 feet2/day S = 2.6 x 10-3 b = 400 feet
625 feet from HG-10s PW
HG-10s PW
GT4-25a - Observed Drawdown
GT3-4 - Observed Drawdwon
Type Curve
1 10 100 1,000 10,000
0.01

Theis Partial Penetration Analysis Results from AQTESOLV

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH
MPK
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.6
100
10
Drawdown (feet)
0.1
Parameters Solution: Theis (partial penetration) T = 2,224 feet2/day S = 9.3 x 10-3 b = 400 feet
HG-10s PW
GT4-25a - Observed Drawdown
GT3-4 - Observed Drawdwon
Type Curve
1 10 100 1,000 10,000
0.01

Theis Partial Penetration Analysis Results from AQTESOLV

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH
MPK
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.7
10 S = 1.0 E-4 S = 1.0 E-3 S = 5.0 E-3 HG-10INT GT4-25A

Predicted drawdown at the pumping well (HG-10S); actual drawdown = 26.03 feet after 12 hours.
8 GT3-4
Drawdown (feet)
Parameters: T = 2,224 ft2/d Q = 9,200 ft3/d (48 gpm) t = 0.5 days
0 1.0 10.0 100.0 1,000.0
0.1
Distance (feet)
Distance vs. Drawdown Semi-Log Plot

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH
MPK
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.8
Groundwater Elevation Contour Map

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
GW DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.9
790
780
770
760
750
Water Level Elevation (feet amsl)
740
730
720 4/1/2009 5/1/2009 6/1/2009 7/1/2009 Date Water Level

2/1/2009
3/1/2009
8/1/2009
9/1/2009
10/1/2009
11/1/2009
North Quarry Water Level - February to October 2010

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.10
2,000
1,800 HG-4
1,600 HG-10S GT3-4 GT4-25A HG-10INT
HG-6
1,400
HG-7
1,200 HG-9 HG-10D HG-8
Groundwater Elevation (feet amsl)
1,000
Greenstone/Graywacke Water Levels
Limestone Water levels
Static groundwater elevation measured on September 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900
800
1,700
1,600
Bottom Elevation of Completion Interval (feet amsl)

Groundwater Elevation vs. Well Completion Elevation

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.11
100
Measured Streamflow Predicted Streamflow Estimated Baseflow
10
Discharge (cfs)
0.1
0.01
0.001 Nov-08 Jan-09 Mar-09 May-09 Jul-09 Sep-09 Nov-09
Jul-08
Sep-08
MS-1 Baseflow Separation Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
JP/DH SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.12
100
Predicted Streamflow Modeled Baseflow
Measured Streamflow
10
Discharge (cfs)
0.1
0.01
Jul-08
Sep-08

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
JP/DH
SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed FIGURE
DB
4.13
10000
Measured Streamflow
1000
100
10
Discharge (cfs)
0.1
0.01
Jul-08
Sep-08

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
JP/DH
SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed FIGURE
DB
4.14
1000
Measured Streamflow
100
10
Discharge (cfs)
0.1
0.01
Jul-08
Sep-08

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
JP/DH
SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed FIGURE
DB
4.15
790
4.50
4.00
780 3.50
770 3.00
760
2.50
750
2.00
740 1.00
730 0.50
720
4/1/2009 5/1/2009 6/1/2009 7/1/2009 Date 8/1/2009 9/1/2009 10/1/2009
0.00
11/1/2009
2/1/2009
3/1/2009
Precipitation
Water Level
Drawn Checked
Project No. Date
North Quarry Water Level and Daily Precipitation

Hydrologic Investigation Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Update 063-7109-500 May 2010
SDT Reviewed DB
FIGURE
4.16
Daily Precipitation (inches) 1.50

DH
790
1,400
780
1,200
770
1,000
760
800
740
400
730
200
720 4/1/2009 5/1/2009 6/1/2009 7/1/2009 Date Pumping Rate

0 8/1/2009 9/1/2009 10/1/2009 11/1/2009
2/1/2009
3/1/2009
Water Level
Drawn DH
North Quarry Water Level and Pumping Rate

Project No. Date
Checked
SDT
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
4.17
Pumping Rate (gpm) 600
750
10,000
780
770
1,000 760
Groundwater inflow of approximately 1,000 gpm Groundwater inflow of approximately 210 gpm
750
100 740
Total North Quarry Inflow (gpm)
730
720
1 4/2/09 5/2/09 6/1/09 Date 7/1/09 7/31/09 8/30/09 9/29/09

North Quarry Water Elevation Surface Runoff (gpm) Precipitation (gpm) Pan Evaporation (gpm)
710 10/29/09
2/1/09
3/3/09
North Quarry Inflow - Existing Condition

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
FIGURE
4.18
North Quarry Water Elevation (ft amsl)

DH SDT DB
10
River condition
Constant Constant head Head
B A A A
Constant head Limestone Unit Drain condition
Section Line (see Figs 5.3 and 5.4)
Greenstone Unit River condition
Constant Head
Constant head
N
4000 feet
Approx location of private wells along Monte Bello ridge Model Domain and Boundary Conditions
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.1
Section 5_MODFLOW_plots_041210.xlsx
Greenstone Unit North Quarry (Drains at 750 ft amsl) Limestone Unit
2,000 feet
N
Model Grid and Boundary Conditions - Quarry Area
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.2
Monte Bello Cr.
Permanente Cr.
North Quarry
4,000 feet Vertical exaggeration = 2.5

Unnamed Creek
B South
B' North
Section North-South Through North Quarry

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.3
Permanente Cr.
North Quarry
A West A' East

Permanente Creek
Vertical exaggeration = 2.5
4,000 feet
Section West-East Through North Quarry

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.4
1,600 Topographic elevation (ft amsl) 4000 feet

N
Model Top Surface - Current Conditions
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
Project No. Date
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.5
North Quarry
1,200
Piezometric Level (ft amsl)
N
Simulated Current Piezometric Heads
Project No.
6,000 feet
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500
Date
Reviewed
DB
May 2010
FIGURE
5.6
North Quarry (Drains)
1,200 Piezometric Level (ft amsl)
1,600 feet
N
Simulated Current Piezometric Heads Quarry Area

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.7
1,800
1,600
Simulated Head (ft amsl)
1,400
1,200
1,000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
1000
Observed Head (ft amsl)

Calibrated versus Observed heads October 2009

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.8
South North
Permanente Cr.
Planned South Quarry
North Quarry

1,000 feet
North-South Section Current Conditions

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.9
South North
Permanente Cr. North Quarry
South Quarry

1,000 feet North-South Section Phase 1

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.10
South North
Permanente Cr. North Quarry (backfilled)
South Quarry


Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.11
South North
North Quarry (backfilled) Permanente Cr.
1,000 feet
South Quarry
Vertical exaggeration = 2.5 North-South Section Phase 3

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.12
South
North Permanente Cr. South Quarry North Quarry


Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.13
South
Permanente Cr. South Quarry
North North Quarry (backfilled)


Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.14
1,200
Piezometric Level (ft amsl) Dry cells
North Quarry
South Quarry
N
2,400 feet
Drawn
SDT
Simulated Piezometric Heads Phase 1

Project No. Date
Checked
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.15
1,200
North Quarry
Dry cells
Piezometric Level (ft amsl)
South Quarry
N
2,400 feet
Simulated Piezometric Heads Phase 5

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
SDT
DH
063-7109-500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
5.16
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 8-Oct-09 16-Jul-09 26-Feb-09 23-Apr-09 18-Jun-09 10-Sep-09 5-Nov-09 3-Dec-09 26-Mar-09 21-May-09 13-Aug-09 31-Dec-09 WW - Nov 09 Nov-09 Month Dec-09 Jan-10
Drawn Checked
Project No. Date
1-Jan-09
Cumulative Precipitation (inches)
29-Jan-09
Date SW - Feb-09 SW - Apr-09 SW - Sep-09 SW - Jan-10
Cumulative Annual Precipitation WW - Wall Washing
SW - Surface Water Monitoring
12
10
2 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09
Monthly Precipitation (inches)
Jan-09
Feb-09
Site Precipitation vs. Surface Water and Wall Washing Sampling Events
Hydrologic Investigation 063-7109.500 May 2010
CR FV Reviewed DB
Lehigh Southwest Cement Company
FIGURE
6.1
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Rainfall.xlsx
18 70 .7 12 47 .5
60
GR O UN D 13 33 .2 12 46 .3 11 4 5. 1 13 31 . 5 11 4 5. 4
79
18
O B S C U R ED 12 46 .0 11 4 4. 1 11 4 0 13 1 1. 8 11 9 0. 1 12 46 .1 13 1 0. 3
0
18 40
DEN S E T R EE S
BY
15
90
12 40
11 9 0
11 4 3. 7 11 4 3. 5 11 9 1. 7 13 82 .9 14 91 . 4 627 . 5 555 . 9 11 9 1. 3 DEN S E T R EE S 11 9 0. 4 11 9 1. 1 13 83 .8 GR O UN D O B S C U R ED BY
11 8 9. 3 12 46 .7
13 83 .7
14 89 .6
640
59
GR O UN D O B S C U R ED DEN S E T R EE S BY 443 . 0 DEN S E T R EE S
0
61 5. 4
441 . 5
18 40
18 90 .6
16
40
14
12 58 .8 11 9 5. 6
64
9
14 22 .9
0
89 0
11 11 4 3. 8 4 3. 4
690
74 0
18 40
18 45 .3
12 55 .5
0
40
10
18 49 .8 11 9 2. 8 10 39 .5 994 . 6 998 . 5 992 . 7 999 . 9 10 36 .4 990 . 6 12 41 . 5 14 00 .7 14 75 .5 GR O UN D O B S C U R ED DEN S E T R EE S BY 694 . 0 554 . 5 552 . 5 12 43 .6 GR O UN D O B S C U R ED DEN S E T R EE S BY
10 40
740
480
18 44 .1 11 9 7. 7 14 76 .0
18 43 .7
17 93 .7
18 48 .7
18 42 .8 18 44 .7
18 38 .7
18 40 .5
17 92 .9
17 91 . 5
17 41 . 9
13 40
840
696 . 8 758 . 5 748 . 5 696 . 1 757 . 3 698 . 3 701 . 0 DEN S E T R EE S 868 . 8 863 . 5 855 . 7 786 . 2 652 . 1 61 2. 9 556 . 9 560 . 7 558 . 2 559 . 5 863 . 7 855 . 1 821 . 7 841 . 2 845 . 0 842 . 2 571 . 4 593 . 6 559 . 6 557 . 4 640 . 4 PI LE 823 . 3 654 . 5 854 . 0
890
640
11 9 5. 2
790
71 6. 0
490
18 43 .8
17 94 .1
13 45 .7 553 . 9
990
552 . 7
470
18 43 .7
13 90
18 44 .0
18 44 .8 11 9 3. 0 993 . 0 554 . 8 DEN S E T R EE S
12 01 . 5 11 3 9. 7 DEN S E T R EE S BY
GR O UN D O B S C U R ED
447 .6
460
18 45 .1 14 05 .2 10 36 .8 BY O B S C U R ED 14 75 .0 GR O UN D
18 58 .7 13 63 .7 11 9 4. 7
18 46 .5 15 74 .8 15 76 .4
0
10 41 . 0
94
89 0
554 . 1
450
15 78 .3 13 60 .4 10 39 .1 10 32 .7
13 34 .1 11 9 6. 7
11 4 4. 8
690
59
18 47 .4 14 1 7. 7 71 8. 1 10 38 .5
11 4 1. 9 12 46 .0 71 8. 7
10 40
540
13 1 1. 5
990
18 46 .8 10 38 .2 10 35 .5
18 49 .2
16
90
490
14
13 68 .2 11 4 2. 8
40
14 24 .5 13 82 .3 11 4 4. 8
13 34 .3 11 9 5. 1
11 4 4. 5 11 4 5. 2
10 90
84 0
445 .9
483 .0
14 40
497 .3 462 .9 464 .8 Pylo n

480
18 47 .8
18 05 .6
18 42 .5
17 90 .4
17 42 .1
12 90
14 74 .9
18 38 .7
17 41 . 7 997 . 3 12 43 .3 13 91 . 5 14 73 .4 14 73 .5 14 74 .1 14 24 .9 13 87 .4 10 64 .2 885 . 8 10 39 .7 883 . 8 867 . 4 870 . 3 865 .7 823 . 2 870 . 8 10 36 .6 10 65 .0 10 23 .1 889 . 8 887 . 1 892 . 5 909 . 2 901 . 9 900 . 8 827 . 3 752 . 8 774 . 1 555 . 7 625 . 1 774 . 4 675 . 3
540
18 39 .3 14 32 .7 14 25 .6 14 26 .1 559 . 1 556 . 0 555 . 0 694 . 9 14 48 .8 14 29 .1 556 . 7 555 . 0 14 25 .3 11 2 7. 9 10 35 .8 12 37 .5 13 1 2. 9 14 41 . 2 13 46 .8 14 41 . 7

40
17 89 .2
17 40 .5 10 04 .7
16 90 .5 14 28 .3
10 36 .1 12 42 .3 14 33 .0
14 37 .7
13 90
13 40
12 90
551 . 7
11 90
695 . 3
11 4 0
690
10 90
SL-27-PD
) "
WL 465 .5
12 40
18
13 35 .1
40
17 99 .9
18 44 .4
18 1 6. 0 12 38 .0 14 74 .6 14 74 .8 14 77 .0
12
18 1 6. 6
17 98 .0 698 . 1 606 . 1 557 . 9
18
40
17 88 .5
16 90 .6
462 .8 467 .7 469 .9
465 .3 467 .5
463 .1
500
461.5 480
17 89 .3
17 38 .4
16 91 . 5
17 97 .6 10 1 6. 3 14 46 .2 874 . 6 874 . 7 872 . 1 845 . 5 784 . 3 867 . 5 821 . 9 785 . 1 675 . 8 680 . 8 554 . 3 10 68 .9 776 . 4 T OP O F T A NK 885 . 0 908 . 7
PER M A N EN T E
463 . 6 470 . 1
RD .
SL-26-PD
) "
475 . 6 478 . 2 51 1 .9
17 97 .3 13 1 3. 4
17 91 . 2
16 91 . 8
18 1 3. 5
17 92 .7
17 92 .7
17
90
16 95 .1
14 40
18 74 .8
13 90
10 26 .1
18 16.9
13 40
18 60
12 90
13 36 .2 12 38 .4 14 95 .8 15 00 .4 14 06 .7 13 35 .0 13 27 .2 13 33 .7 13 33 .0 13 02 .8 10 32 .4 883 . 9 874 . 9 885 . 9 874 . 6 897 . 1 904 . 6 889 . 3 820 . 9 81 5. 8 776 . 8
0 59
18 40
12
13 68 .6 12 90 .1 872 . 7 904 . 0 758 . 6 833 . 6 698 . 8 61 4. 4 PI LE 558 . 6 557 . 1 520 . 4 847 . 3 845 . 9 755 . 6 838 . 6 12 72 .9 10 42 .7 13 87 .0
18
20
16 62 .9 12 72 .4 10 34 .9 13 43 .8 13 87 .8 13 36 .5 869 . 6 12 80 .3
12
18
10 38 .5 12 38 .0 14 1 5. 0 14 77 .0
16
13 36 .4
90
40
14 88 .5
17 51 . 8 12 41 . 4
17 55 .2 12 37 .8 14 41 . 0 14 77 .4 13 87 .9
17
13 1 3. 9 14 77 .2 10 73 .7 14 74 .6
40
13 43 .9
16
40
12 37 .1 14 75 .1
16 84 .8
16 26 .1
472 . 5
510.6 511.8 510.9 511.9

51 1 .7 51 2. 5
90
40
18 00
18 40
17
13 44 .2 12 71 . 8 10 50 .5 12 38 .4 12 40 .4 13 42 .1 13 67 .2 14 04 .7 14 05 .8 13 87 .5 13 66 .0 12 36 .3 12 71 . 4 13 34 .6 12 71 . 2 12 72 .0 12 71 . 7 12 72 .0 12 71 . 9 12 72 .2 12 72 .0 12 72 .1 12 72 .0 13 08 .6 11 5 2. 9 11 5 3. 6 907 . 2 863 . 1 843 . 3
79 0
89 0
17
40
15 39 .8 12 1 4. 1 11 2 4. 4
14 35 .0
13 1 2. 8
12 38 .5
13 48 .1
17 80
13 88 .3 13 67 .9 12 73 .8 10 34 .2 13 65 .7 13 46 .5 12 70 .9 10 54 .5 11 2 4. 6 12 38 .2 10 65 .1 12 37 .4 11 2 7. 0 12 94 .2 895 . 6 908 . 9 883 . 5 14 05 .1
990
5-4
18 20
17
12 38 .8 13 88 .6 14 05 .2 884 . 0 892 . 3 908 . 3 899 . 1 821 . 3 81 8. 6 901 . 1 905 . 4 824 . 8 900 . 3 873 . 5
20
90
10 44 .8
14 84 .2 14 91 . 3
17 20
17 00
18 00
15 24 .0 12 78 .3 12 77 .8 12 24 .9 12 47 .9
13 43 .1
16
0
12 36 .8 891 . 0 885 . 4 81 7. 7 736 . 9 686 . 3 595 . 9 591 . 0 573 . 2 594 . 5 575 . 5 PI LE 577 . 4 559 . 1 559 . 0 561 . 7 557 . 4 773 . 5 851 . 0 740 . 3 807 . 8 805 . 3 724 . 4 691 . 5 723 . 2 692 . 1 690 . 6 625 . 1 675 . 2 561 . 5 691 . 0 690 . 4 81 4. 9 738 . 3 725 . 5 688 . 1 695 . 1 729 . 1 557 . 8 887 . 7 892 . 5 858 . 2 865 . 4 872 . 6 874 . 4 887 . 6 881 . 1 786 . 5 793 . 6 765 . 3 692 . 1 796 . 2 865 . 2 878 . 0 880 . 8 873 . 6 879 . 4 883 . 9
16
9 11
0
60
940
885 . 0 881 . 4 883 . 0 .7 880 . 2 892
16 60
10 76 .4 12 35 .6 13 39 .0 13 35 .7 11 2 9. 0 13 35 .2 13 1 9. 2 13 1 8. 1 12 71 . 9 12 72 .1 12 26 .0 12 26 .7
12
16 80
17 80
13 43 .2 13 87 .2
17 60
18
00
12
40
12 1 9. 7 884 . 8 883 . 9
620
5-5
12 74 .2
600
18 14.9
15 1 8. 6
51 1 .7 525 . 7 51 0. 8 484 . 6 51 0. 2 534 . 7 DEN S E T R EE S 488 . 1
580
17 40
15 24 .7
15 1 4. 7 15 09 .9
12 20 .4
10 40
51 8. 1
51 6. 1
51 1 .2
560
17 60
51 3. 4
540
15 1 0. 8
14 97 .4
11 2 3. 4
14 06 .2
SL-25-CR
DEN S E T R EE S
52
60
) " ) "
18 20
18
00
17
80
16 87 .9
15 90
15 42 .4
15 41 . 6
15 20 .9
15 09 .4
14
Den se Tree s
640
17
80
40
12 34 .9
11 4
17
16
11 2 8. 9 12 34 .1 10 97 .1 12 31 . 9 13 26 .0 13 1 7. 9 12 72 .6 12 72 .9 11 4 8. 7 12 71 . 1 12 72 .3 12 72 .1 12 71 . 6 71 . 9 12 12 71 . 6 12 71 . 7 12 71 . 5 12 71 . 8 91 1 .9 12 72 .4 11 6 0. 2 907 . 1 13 08 .9 12 71 . 2 13 00 .8 12 71 . 6 13 42 .8 13 32 .3 13 21 . 6 873 . 1 556 . 8 552 . 2 91 6. 0 879 . 6 13 25 .3 12 71 . 4 12 71 . 5 12 71 . 9 12 66 .7 904 . 3 91 1 .3 91 9. 9 91 7. 8 868 . 2
40
17 40
17
60
17 35 .0
15 24 .4
15 21 . 1
15 34 .2
15 1 3. 1
17
40
15 23 .9
15 1 1. 7
20
17
20
15 65 .1
15 64 .4
16 00
10 90
12 32 .9 12 33 .3 12 34 .8 11 0 1. 8
15 80
17
00
17 20
15 77 .8
15
60
15
40
16 80
17 00
17
20
15 58 .1
14
90
13 55 .4
14
40
13 44 .4
541 . 0
492 . 7 491 . 7 546 . 4 495 . 0 493 . 4
489 . 4
49
17 30
15 22 .1
15 1 0. 9
13 49 .3
13 55 .8
SL-24-PD
549 . 9 499 . 3 552 . 3 549 . 7 552 . 4 551 . 4 552 . 9 503 . 9 503 . 6 553 . 4 506 . 1 501 . 9
51 0. 1
40
16
16
14 80
16
10
40
17 03 .2
40
12 90
12 36 .3 11 0 1. 5
90
15 00
17
00
15
15 20
60
15 15 78 .7 82 .3
15 53 .9
13
90
13 64 .6
51 0. 7
13 42 .1
54
51 0. 2 509 . 6 495 . 9
16
80
13 98 .6 12 84 .1 13 34 .2 12 73 .0 12 71 . 6 12 71 . 7 11 5 2. 5 858 . 6 762 . 7 692 . 6 691 . 8 678 . 9 584 . 4 560 . 7 649 . 0 642 . 4 764 . 0
740
13 75 .7
13 34 .7
84
15
00
12 71 . 9 767 . 9
17
11 9 0
) "
69
11 0 2. 2 11 1 5. 9 882 . 7
14 80
11 4 2. 5 12 1 6. 0 11 2 6. 6 11 7 5. 5 12 56 .9 692 . 7 691 . 5 559 . 7 12 53 .7 12 48 .3 12 68 .1 794 . 2 10 1 0. 2 864 . 0 864 . 8 797 . 5 702 . 1 706 . 2
69 0
15 00
11 4 5. 7 12 52 .9 12 71 . 5 696 . 5 10 08 .7 10 28 .3 694 . 2 799 . 8 690 . 4 71 1 .2 642 . 7 643 . 5 701 . 3 642 . 7 687 . 1 685 . 0 685 . 9 684 . 1 684 . 7 642 . 2 687 . 8 649 . 6 605 . 7 584 . 1 535 . 1 534 . 3 534 . 8 534 . 5 574 . 0 591 . 6 638 . 7 575 . 8 573 . 0 571 . 0 571 . 3 570 . 1 566 . 8 568 . 6 557 . 0 568 . 0 564 . 4 565 . 7 556 . 7 556 . 1 534 . 7 556 . 2 521 . 0 556 . 2 557 . 9 653 . 7 609 . 2 608 . 5 645 . 7 595 . 0 635 . 9 575 . 7 661 . 8 685 . 9 664 . 6 662 . 2 687 . 0 850 . 2 705 . 8 852 . 7 695 . 8 662 . 1 660 . 8 666 . 8 667 . 8 573 . 8 578 . 6 597 . 8 665 . 7 598 . 5 665 . 9 599 . 6 599 . 3 599 . 7 603 . 5 603 . 9 603 . 0 601 . 9 586 . 8 585 . 1 574 . 3 555 . 2 585 . 0 PI LE 552 . 8 572 . 5 535 . 3 592 . 3 598 . 4 579 . 4 667 . 7 576 . 7 573 . 8 570 . 3 569 . 4 569 . 4 684 . 5 658 . 5 668 . 1 640 . 0 656 . 9 659 . 6 573 . 9 659 . 0 659 . 7 573 . 2 693 . 3 646 . 0 676 . 3 690 . 8 687 . 7 698 . 9 691 . 8 705 . 5 693 . 7 692 . 9 692 . 4 696 . 2 61 2. 0 559 . 9 856 . 6 850 . 3 12 53 .2 793 . 4 12 70 .8 12 71 . 6 12 70 .2 10 05 .4 12 65 .9 12 71 . 6 12 71 . 9 12 71 . 5 765 . 8 760 . 4
15 20
14
14
15
12 73 .0 12 72 .8
15
11 0 4. 5 11 5 2. 3 859 . 9 774 . 3 767 . 7 PI LE 13 37 .5 12 72 .5 71 . 2 12 12 71 . 9 768 . 1 11 4 5. 4 767 . 4 10 64 .1 793 . 7 790 765 . 8 885 . 7 692 . 1 581 . 5 676 . 1
80
00
20
16 60
16
40
16 20 .1
13 96 .7
11 0 7. 1
64
15
12 73 .2 12 12 71 . 3 71 . 9 865 . 6 11 4 5. 3 12 72 .4 842 . 2 692 . 0
40
16 80
16 1 1. 9 12 71 . 1 12 71 . 9
14 06 .8
11 4 0
12 72 .2
13 07 .0
788 . 0
60
887 . 6 798 . 2
12 78 .8
12 71 . 5 11 5 5. 3
14 60
0
15
80
00
15 1 4. 3
13 95 .9
13 84 .6
60
16
20
16
60
51 1 .1 498 . 1
51 3. 4 533 . 5 500 . 5 51 6. 0
660
15 40
60
16
20
SL-BG-CR
11 4 3. 7 10 87 .6 12 04 .6 12 55 .4 12 45 .3 10 52 .4 11 5 4. 1 10 48 .9 872 . 9 695 . 3 767 . 2 71 2. 8 733 . 7 750 . 8 71 2. 8 752 . 5 694 . 6 71 5. 3 696 . 0 642 . 0 573 . 1 686 . 9 656 . 8 693 . 4 WL 706 . 8 692 . 9 685 . 9 903 . 4 884 . 8 739 . 2 695 . 0 864 . 7 698 . 4 10 66 .2 10 64 .4 10 57 .6 10 46 .3 10 64 .6 10 62 .1 690 . 1 12 54 .3 12 63 .2 12 34 .5 12 35 .0 12 57 .7 12 53 .5 12 59 .6 12 54 .0 555 . 5 10 88 .5 11 4 2. 2 11 3 8. 2 11 8 0. 2 12 24 .3 12 03 .7 12 1 0. 9 12 1 3. 6 12 32 .7 12 05 .5 11 4 2. 8 11 4 8. 7 11 9 6. 5 11 1 6. 4 11 0 5. 6 11 8 2. 7 11 8 3. 9 11 6 4. 0 11 7 7. 5 11 8 4. 6 11 3 5. 2 11 3 2. 7 11 9 5. 7 11 3 3. 4 12 54 .9 12 54 .4 10 89 .0
15 60
16
00
15 78 .5
68
15
0
502 . 9 51 6. 7 505 . 1 555 . 0 554 . 5 508 . 0 508 . 0 51 8. 9 534 . 3 507 . 8 555 . 5 555 . 3 51 2. 7 556 . 3 555 . 9 51 4. 9 51 4. 7 51 8. 9 51 7. 2 51 2. 3 51 0. 4 509 . 9 521 . 1 GR O UN D O B S C U R ED DEN S E T R EE S BY 532 . 9 573 . 8
15 80
15 80
16
15 78 .6
90
20
15
16 20
12 40
11 90
12 40
16
13 91 . 2
00
16 40
15 98 .2
11 9 2. 9
11 4 6. 2
15
16 60
80
15 99 .8
12 96 .3
U n
12 96 .5
16 00
16
15 21 . 0
11 4 3. 1
14
40
5-9
16 05 .3
12 96 .4
70
14
15 80 .3
16 1 5. 3
90
15 23 .3
13 94 .0
12 42 .4
11 9 0. 8
40
16 80
90
15
60
15 89 .1
15 26 .3
13 93 .1
12 86 .7
11 9 3. 8
11 4 0. 4
11 3 5. 2
10 91 . 5
72
74
17 00
10
11
17 40
10 42 .2 10 61 . 5 10 53 .2 10 34 .0 764 . 2 11 8 9. 5 11 3 5. 7
11 4
15 90
17 60
0
10 97 .6
15 20
11 4 2. 0 10 96 .9 11 8 6. 8
15 65 .2
15 55 .9 11 8 3. 3 10 97 .9 10 95 .8
15 44 .4 12 1 3. 2 11 2 5. 8 10 1 7. 8 10 37 .3
15 51 . 2
90
17 20
10 54 .4 731 . 8 729 . 3
SW-1
64 0
15 40
15 29 .8
13 23 .3
15 26 .1
11 9 3. 3
11 3 7. 8
13 92 .3
12 94 .0
11 4 2. 0
10 94 .5
522 . 1
748 .1 741.5
523 . 7 597 . 7
750 .5 750 .3
Pylo n
12 96 .5
89
17 80
11 8 3. 4
15 00
11 4 2. 4
79
18 20
40
18 40
11 4 6. 7 11 6 7. 8
10
Den se Tree s
10
10 61 . 3 10 95 .5 11 0 8. 0 10 89 .3 10 1 3. 3 949 . 9 923 . 3 755 . 0 735 . 7 726 . 8 10 99 .4 10 68 .3 10 32 .5 694 . 1 71 6. 1 694 . 3 10 64 .9
14 60
15 88 .6
15 86 .7
90
12 94 .8 747 . 5
12 84 .4
11 9 7. 9
18 60
11 3 6. 9 11 3 8. 0 11 1 3. 0 10 78 .6 10 93 .7 10 86 .8 963 . 4 966 . 8 935 . 6 10 99 .4 11 0 2. 8 10 91 . 1 10 93 .5 10 54 .5 948 . 6 10 45 .2 10 28 .8 678 . 6 10 43 .3 661 . 7 666 . 6 666 . 0 772 . 3 695 . 4 726 . 3 696 . 2 688 . 6 601 . 0 673 . 9 669 . 1 876 . 0 723 . 3 721 . 1 668 . 9 669 . 1 772 . 4 668 . 6 591 . 5 729 . 3 691 . 6 657 . 7 660 . 8 952 . 8 10 24 .7 10 55 .9 967 . 8 927 . 5 10 66 .8 10 84 .1 10 79 .0 10 83 .6 10 01 . 2 10 76 .5 10 35 .6 999 . 1 10 42 .4 10 40 10 41 . 7 10 60 .8
10 40
14
11 3 5. 2 11 3 7. 1 11 3 7. 6 10 77 .5 10 77 .4 10 66 .1 11 0 3. 4 10 56 .1 10 81 . 3 10 61 . 3 10 94 .0
14
11 1 8. 5
11 4 0
14
10 84 .9 10 63 .6
40
20
14
00
14 40
15 1 6. 3
14 87 .3
10
10
0
11 4 0. 9
90
40
740
0
725 . 3 71 7. 8 727 . 8 727 . 0
11 2 5. 2 10 91 . 6 91 4. 4 723 . 7
11 8 7. 3
11 6 4. 4
10 94 .7
# *
94 0
906 . 0
14 80
84 0
10 57 .3 765 . 0 725 . 7 728 . 8 71 5. 4
18 00
11 5 6. 1
15 79 .2
14 84 .5 11 3 4. 0
11 7 6. 6
11 6 6. 6 11 4 5. 7
10 96 .0
10 60 .6 10 33 .0
80
14 07 .2
12 92 .1
11 3 8. 8
13
9
59 573 . 1
742 .3
14
00
51 7. 2 51 9. 3 51 9. 3
740
527 . 6 597 . 7
746 . 3
15
90
13
13
60
69
80
13
18 80
14
80
) "
11 4 9. 1
40
14 20
11
15 87 .7
19 20
15 40
10 40 .8 10 63 .9 10 84 .0
1 09 0
245
90
14 90
19 40
60
10 30 .1 10 39 .3 10 71 . 2 10 02 .3 10 33 .9 10 39 .8 10 38 .9 11 0 6. 3 11 0 3. 7 10 32 .5 10 38 .1 10 85 .2 10 00 .2 999 . 8 10 40
15 60
15
15
19
1 87.8 3 5
1 87.8 0 5
12 90 .7
12 65 .1
11 8 1. 6 10 74 .0
10 90
522 . 9 556 . 1 523 . 4 522 . 0
54
10 43 .4
54
13 04 .3 10 78 .1
556 . 6
15 20
10 90
11 0 5. 0 93 .2 10
40
10 68 .9
19 00
15 00
15 88 .5
15 1 6. 6
14 89 .5
13 01 . 5
13 07 .8
12 75 .5
12
11 9 5. 6 11
Pylo n
747 . 6 GR O UN D 529 . 1
11 3 8. 2
O B S C U R ED DEN S E T R EE S
BY
15
40
19
15
80
60
10 33 .1 10 30 .4 10 45 .4 994 . 2 997 . 8 994 . 6 11 0 5. 9 10 65 .7 939 . 4 10 29 .1 10 23 .1 10 25 .6 10 45 .2 10 39 .0 10 39 .7 972 . 8 960 . 2 81 2. 3 987 . 2 880 . 4 10 45 .6 81 4. 4 981 . 5 773 . 6 10 29 .4 10 55 .1 10 1 8. 8 10 36 .9
15 89 .9
15 89 .9
15 1 7. 7
14 92 .7
13 1 7. 2
11 3 9. 1
10 40
10 44 .2
10 53 .5
14 40
200
SL-1-CR
11 4 8. 1 986 . 9
990
15 80
15 88 .6
15 94 .6
20
0
10 90
16 00
Un
90
20
16 20
pa
Den se Tree s
ve
15 22 .9
12 99 .1
12 90 .5
12 92 .8
12 93 .2
12 55 .7
12 92 .9
11 9 3. 7
531 . 0 555 . 6 525 . 6 557 . 4 555 . 3 527 . 2 524 . 1
59
0
640
703 . 6
690
680
660
640
69
526 . 0 CB 570 .9 553 . 7 527 . 9 559 . 5 556 . 2 529 . 5 531 . 9 527 . 6 533 . 1
Ro
13
13
40
12 04 .1 11 5 5. 2 11 4 5. 7 997 . 8
40
20
16 40
ad
14 95 .0
13 02 .5
13 03 .1
12 92 .7
12 52 .2
11 9 7. 0
12 63 .4
DEN S E T R EE S
620
60 0
15
40
90
15 20
12
20
940
5-6
16 80
16 60
15 26 .7
15 26 .2
14 97 .1
20
890
17
17 00
15 04 .8
GR O UN D
80
17
20
15 05 .3
DEN S E T R EE S
O B S C U R ED
BY
12 1 5. 0
565 . 3
SL-23-CR
562 . 1 554 . 4 557 . 5 534 . 7 573 . 4 573 . 4 573 . 9 558 . 8 556 . 5 554 . 5 534 . 0 533 . 7
) "
530 . 4 532 . 6 538 . 4 537 . 0
15 00
740 . 7
71 3. 2
14
80
21
00
17
10 05 .3
17 60
40
SL-4A2-RD SL-4A1-RD
) "
10 03 .2 WL 851 .8 848 . 9 81 9. 0 10 06 .4 960 . 8
990
Den se Tree s
14
60
14
40
80
732 . 6 707 . 9 736 . 8
3-5
) " ) "
848 . 4 823 . 0 860 . 5 961 . 9 872 . 3 895 . 1
940
0
600
580
14
13
00
80
14 80
14
60
14 60
14
40
14
20
14
00
12 40
12 60 12 80
13
13
80
13
60
Den se Tree s
12
20
) " SL-5A-CR
11 2 0
590
19
19
13 00 13 20
80
60
13 40
00
20
40
40
20
40
20
13
60
14 40
40
640
20
20
20
60
13
80
00
60
20
80
17
17
16
17
17
21
12
16
16
16
16
15
40
Den se Tree s
11 8 0
12 20
80
60
19
20
19
40
14 00
15
14
15
14
15
40
14
60
14
14
18
80
Den se Tree s
808 . 6
14
13 80
14
14
19
13
80
00
20
00
15
14 20
40
12 00
00
60
13
40
14 20
13
20
13
00
13
20
14 00
12
12
80
13
13
20
660
71 3. 7
20
13
13
40
Den se Tree s
60
60
80
40
21
14
00
80
14
13
60
20
80
59
00
18
20
18
12 00
0
11 4 0
60
11 4
13
803 . 7
00
13 60
15
12
12
690
64 0
620
15
21
21 20
20
11 6 0
804 . 4 996 . 4 990 . 2 WL 744 . 6 963 . 7 733 . 6 683 . 0 962 . 6 736 . 0 737 . 0 808 . 9 873 . 4
890
00
13
13 20
00
80
60
12
40
584 . 4
00
20
PI LE
554 . 3
538 . 8 550 . 7 594 . 5 556 . 9 598 . 7 554 . 4 553 . 7
14
721 . 1
720
640
3-9
14
60
680
13
80
13
70
550
Den se Tree s 551.2 550 .5 615.1 552 .7

55 0
40
13
20
60
13
18
21 40
00
13 40
803 . 0
SL-5-CR
11 8 0
11 6 0
805 . 4 806 . 4 861 . 9 804 . 0 802 . 2 805 . 9 809 . 9
840
15
80
18
17
72 0
80
13 20
13 00
66
0
68
15 37 .9
12 00
70
740
72 0
20
13 00 800 . 9
13 20
12
80
Den se Tree s 12 20
11 8 0
13 40
) SL-4-CR "
Den se Tree s
10
10
12 60
760
66
640
62
60
13 60
802 . 3 797 . 8
13 80
780
74 0
13 20
12 80
14 00
12 40
790
14 20
10
13 60
13 40
13
12 80
00
14 40
20
12
00
00
20
11
14 60
10
20
13
40
12
14 20
15 00
15 40
Den se Tree s
9 2
13 20
0
900
0
90
82 0
0 80
78 0
Pi pe
711.2
70
Pi pe 680 711.5
40
13
60
14 40
15 60
15 20
13 40
14 60
15 80
12
11 6 0
84 0
Conveyor Conveyor
552 .2
62
Den se Tree s
76 0
652 .9
66
15 20
880
11 4 0
68
64
14 80
13 00
14 00
74
15 00
550
0
940
860
66
55
13 80
14 80
12
SL-13A-RD )) "" ) SL-13B-PD SL-11-CR " ) " SL-13-PD ) " SL-12-PD

11
0
840
745 .2
0 64 0
797 . 8
785 . 1
Conveyor Wate r Level 73 3.9'
706 .6
652 .0 Pi pe Conveyor 651.0

62
550 .8 580 .4 Pi le
800
766 .9 550 .7 571.0

298 47 807. 06 807. 60
760
571.7
809 .4
802 .9
Pylo n 76 787 .4
10
40
60
820
800
717.7
740
72
70
88
86
0
0
15 40
13 80
13 80
11 8 0
14 80
15 00
14 00
13
90
Den se Tree s
960
980
88 0
0
13
12
00
10 00
60
13 60
16 00
920
940
620
16 20
80
Conveyor 738 .4
Pi pes 710.9
633 .1
16 40
552 .3 567 .0 Pi le
555 .5 Den se Tree s 568 .6

78 0
62 0
640
80
R PE
15 60
15 20
14 00
13
16 60
770 .2 709 .4
56
660
15 80
12
14 40
15 60
10 20
Den se Tree s
00
14 20
15 40
16
80
14 20
556 .9
66
64
13
8 4 0
82 0
20
86 0
680
801.8
700
00
14
62
86
70
66
60
AN
74
800
80
58
17
17
40
15
760
00
72 0
15 80
720
15
74
15
10 80
40
0
780
840
17 00
20
12 60
10 60
82
17
15 60
0
40
808 .4
Pi le
78
16 80
17
00
15
15
10
621.8
0
60
15 40
20
760
80
13
800 .8
58
20
740
16
60
15
12 40
709 .6
693 .9
16 60
720
60
14
15 20
15 00
70
16
15
00
68
10 40
76
16 40
40
40
710.3
66
16
14
00
0
15
68
64
80
14 80
0
0
78
62
20
14
12 20
Pi le
0
64
16
Den se Tree s
88
60
82
16 20
20
14 80
16 00
14
14
840
Den se Tree s
80
805 .8
13 40
16 00
14 40
14 60
558 .6
0
60
15 80
800
68 0
694 .6
Den se Tree s 561.6
720
740
760
70
14
780
0
60
798 .4
852 .6
80 0
80
17
60
673 .8 798 .3
205 807. 52
800
17
19 20
80
17
10
16 00
70
15
820
40
80
17
6
80
15 60
11 0 0
70
82
18
21
16 20
00
60
13 80
11 6 0
11 2 0
11 8 0
0 0
18
15 80
15
18
18
16 00
TE EN
18
20
20
20
20
0
16 60
0
16 40
18
60
40
820
800
780
760
72
700
20
00
40
00
11 4 0
11
798 .7
74
Den se Tree s
0
68 0
16
11 2 0
Den se Tree s Den se Tree s
19
84
15
693 .3
Den se Tree s
780
) "
807 .8 665 .7
0
840
860
680
40
19
17
80
60
80
21
18
20
16
20
40
16 80
257 1 053 0 679. 93 680. 03
16 20
12 20
16 40
14 20
Conveyor
74
0
72
700
0
625 .4
76
578 .3
680
594 .8
90
00
19
19
17 80
80
17 60
17 20
17
17
40
60
17
20
17 40
17
80
17
40
506
15 20
12 60
11 8 0
1 58.8 6 8
20
EK RE C
18
00
17
60
18 00
17 40
78
15 40
Den se Tree s
76
12 00
74
Den se Tree s
12
15 60
19
20
19
19
40
13 20
18 40
18
80
13
20
17
80
18
00
Un
pa
ve
Ro
ad
18 20
17 60
00
15 80
12 20
0
Den se Tree s
82
80
72 0
70 0
68 0
860
915.5 917.4
66 0
880
640
620
60
911.6 Den se Tree s Den se Tree s

660
# *
Den se Tree s
) "
600
) " ) )) " ""

Den se Tree s 670 .1 656 .4
680
62
618.6 621.5 614.3 671.6

68 0
70
911.9 618.6
620
900
Den se Tree s
17
13
40
18
84
920
20
20
40
0
204
20
13 60
18 00
20
0
18 60
80
16 00
Den se Tree s Den se Tree s

880
90 0
13 8 0
18
68
206 0
19
72
206 0
208
208 0
14
18 60
19
16 60
00
18
00
20
17
80
18
0 98
Den se Tree s
00
18 20
12 00
16 40
14
92
0
652 .9 Pi les
0
21 00
14 40
00
18 40
21 20
20
21
00
40
19
920
19
17 00
60
40
14 80
40
10
17
16 80
60
14 6 0
11 6 0
0
80
10
11 8 0
94
643 .4 673 .9
634 .9 652 .7 636 .3 Den se Tree s

72 0
628 .7
66
900
70
18
16 20
60
18
20 86
18
18
40
80
924 .1 618.1 922 .6

920
74 0
76 0
80
18
20
SL-17-PD
78
80
82
84
86
88
Un pav e d
Ro ad
940
944 .4
Den se Tree s
920
960
980 10 00
6
20
10
0
18 20
21 40
10
0
18
SW-2 SL-14-CR
800
780
21
11
10
20
51 2
17 20
15 20
15 00
20
1 70.9 8 8
17 40 17 20
21
40
20
17 00
204 0
17 60
15 60
16
17 80
18
17
Un pav e d Ro ad
17 60
11
17 40
15 40
10 20
2
11 4
0
Conveyor
74 0
640
644 .8
80
00
80
659 .2 Conveyor
76
78
642 .8
0
0
658 .7
660
900
800
88
16
18 00
60
18 16.7
40
20
10 80
17 85 .6
10 60
10
10 60
672 .4
Conveyor
658 .2
660 680
880
860
840
86
840
820
22
00
860
720
17
680
12 60
860
78
pa
Den se Tree s
00
17 00
21 20
15 20
683 .2
0
740
20
13
17 60
12 20
21 60
21 00
18 21.5
13 20
13
70
Un
76
13
00
21
14 60
14 80
60
19
15 00
21 80
226
22
22
15 40
16
60
17 40
22
40
2
80
0
17 60
23
15 60
23
15
16
40
20
16 80
23
00
21 40
19
20
21
20
19
60
16 40
M O
60
16 60
Un pav ed
80
Den se Tree s
17
17 80
94
96
0
0
686 .6
78
21
15
80
228 0
19
40
16
20
16 00
00
20
16 20
13 20
760
21
40
18 00
224 0
226 0
21
60
19
00
18
80
18
60
16
40
17
20
80
Den se Tree s
13 00
Den se Tree s
92
74
20
2166 .9
00
14
16
16
16 60
40
692 .3
21
222 0
Ro ad
Un pav ed
Ro ad
16
16
20
12 80
16
00
Den se Tree s
0
72
21
80
16 80
220 0
17
15
60
12 60
0
9 0
21 40
40
40
15
13
860
72
70
21 80
15 40
664 .9
12 40
78
720
84
86
21 40
88
760
74
80
Pi les
0
689 .9
0
40
17
12 00
870
Den se Tree s
0
82
12
78
24
21 20
208 0
Den se Tree s
ve
0
20
84
242
Den se Tree s
17
11 8 0
86
68
659 .2
76 0
80
21 00
Den se Tree s
0
80
20
206 0
80
Den se Tree s
82
Den se Tree s
0
80
240
840
Ro
740
78
208 0
670
76
238
204 0
11 6 0
660
82
84
659 .2
ad
236
657 .1
0
18 00
206 0
0
232
23
84
202 0
18
74
234
20
17 80
11 4 0
82
00
22
80
60
70
40
204 0
200 0
19 80
660
22
17
20
11 0 0 11 2 0
17 60
800
668 .7 669 .2 Conveyor

0
685 .8
68 0
20
202 0
60
19
60
19
40
18
SL-15-CR
Pi les
675 .6
702 .9 Conveyor s 687 .3 704 .7 72

0
82 0
880
80
0
78
900
0
900
76
88
920
Den se Tree s
20
80
0
16 40
830
80
74
18
76
234 0
60
74
21
LO
15 20
16
21
16 20
) " ) " ) " ) "

15
14 20
40
Den se Tree s
16 40
244 0
40
20
20
14
40
740
Den se Tree s
60
13 00
783 .6
760
15
15 60
# * ) "
60
248 0
) "
16 00
15 80
252 0
14
80
00
23
23
20
15
00
Un pav
0
40
80
15 20
3-6
23
22
15
25
8
15
40
22
18
80
CR
14 60
15 60
16
40
ed
00
250 3.4
00
22
22
20
12 80
Ro ad
80
12
21
20
20
19
00
12 68 .6
780
800
820
840
46
782 .8
62
Den se Tree s
246 0
60
800
76
66
202 1.7
14
16 60
20
78
60
242 0
21
780
40
68
14
80
16
13 14.3
72
779 .9
0
70
240 0
16 83 .7
ed
Ro ad
12
12
40
782 .9
20
73
EB EL
15 00
16 20
72
24
00
60
Un pav
12
74
16
74
64
660
11 6 0 11 8 0 00
12
74
238 0
770 .3
76
68
720
80
75
24
781 .39
Den se Tree s
70
68
740
72
12
720
) "
14
60
843. 53
760
660
0
70
21
15 00
25
40
19
20
18
60
Den se Tree s
0
60
258
20
60
20
25
3-8
) " ) " ) )) " ""

15 20
Den se Tree s
14 0
40
80
40
3-7
860
12
12 90
12
780
12
640
68 0
) " ) " )) ""

15 60
0
18 40
EE
13
15
20
25
60
18 20
20
90
252 0
13 60
248
80
15 40
14
14 89 .6
13 00
254 0
15 20
10
20
254 5.2
13 40
244 0
17 80
15 00
13 20
14 60
15 20
3-1 0
84
10
13 30
242 0
) " )) "" )) "" ) "

14 80
3-9
14 80
94
15
00
12 00
Den se Tree s
14
12 20
Den se Tree s
14 60
14 40
14
0
14
2-8
13 00 .9
14 20
12 40
12 99 .9
40
13
16
20
14 20
00
13 40
960
20
15
16
14 00
00
80
Den se Tree s
80
14 40
14 20
14
15
13 04 .1
60
40
980
12 60
13 06 .1
00
12
80
12 60
Pylo n
62
12 80
0
2-9
60
13 20
62
14 80
15 27 .6
80
64
00
64
00
15
20
13
12 92 .9
13
13
11 8 0
4-3
18 60
17 20
00
12 80
15
20
11 6
92
90
66
18 80
15
15 00
15
40
20
20
00
19 00
17 40
40
13 00
40
13 40
11
11 2
Den se Tree s
15
88
3-1 1 4-2
68
) " # *
14
00
19 20
17 60
11 0
10 80
86
68
60
70
62
60
72
19 40
13 20
10
40
246 0
18 00
Den se Tree s
10
13 1 0
10
20
00
820
72
74
K
15 00
98
19
Den se Tree s
80
12 60 70
50
12
50
96
940
920
900
880
800
620
72
15
16
3004 3
236 0
0
40
11 4
1 30.8 6 3
242
208 6.6
76
15
3005 7
11 2
60
00
77
74
240 0
15
14 00
11
80
Pi les
0
78
40
20
80
10
760
20
80
0 0
60
232 0
16
13 80
10
777 .3
0
79
80
00
17
780
17
23
16 60
40
820
81
10
800
Den se Tree s
230 0
21
NT
17 20
13 60
20
820
23
60
00
10
10 00
840
228 0
14
80
16
16
60
Pylo n
98
70
807 .6
0
0
80
801.9
Den se Tree s
74
80
1118.8
13 20
78
76
82 0
0
600
72 0
0
0
84
580
7 0
13 60
13 40
15
15
15
15 20
80
14
60
40
Den se Tree s
15 00
14
860
660
60
60
14
13 20
40
0
14 00
15
15
13 00
60
12 97 .9
20
11 1 0
15
80
00
12 85 .5
14
940
15
13 80
620
0
68 0
560
0
14
80
15
40
13 00
12 80
15
0 6
40
14
2
20
14
40
14
00
13
60
80
14
14
920
15
12
00
40
15
80
12 60
15
14
14
40
15
80
15
13
16
12 80
40
20
00
13
60
12 40
12 20
16 20 .1
15
14 20
15
12 60
14
16
60
12
15 60
110 5.7
80
12 00
64
640
11
0
59
560
58
0
40
60
15
11
80
11
8
6
0
0
10
80
570
54
10 60
13
13
13
13 00
13 20
15 87 .8
14 00
12 60
10 40
12 40
66
94 0
12 00
13 40
10
11 8 0
12 80
13 20 13 00
12 20
98
10
0
20
00
600
620
68 0
56
580
13 60
15
40
15 60
12
15 40
20
60
12 00
0
10
10 20
14 00
13 60
80
13
15
20
11
12 02 .4
14
6
14
20
0 11
15
00
0
62
13 80
62
20
11
14 20
13 20
00 13
14 40
40
64
13
64
840
17
17
15 00
90
19
Den se Tree s
00
00
860
60
20
880
ad
70
Ro
14
pav
12 00
12 40 12 20
14 80
60
ed
80
80
0
Den se Tree s
14
14
12
72
0.5
60
80 12 60
15 00
1
11 8 0
15 00
11
0
92 0
68
15
11
94
66
Un
15 40
14 60
94
Den se Tree s
14
90
86
15 20
15 40
14
15 20
88
301 43
21 70.0 9
301 45
84
60
13
40
16 40
16 60
15 20
40
13
13 00
12 80
16 80
20
17 00
17 20
12 40
12 20
16
13 40
14
14
13 20
12 60
21
19
842 .4
0
40
80
842 .6
66
15
20
11 4 0
60
667 .1
Pylo n
740
00
720
88
15
18
19
00
80
80
18
16 20
12 00
40
14 00
21
18
60
720
0
) "
70 0
680
66 0
SL-20-RD
631.5
740
16
16
905 .2
760
Un pav
ed
Ro
ad
16
19
17 20
11 6
16 80
14 80
20
17 00
14 60
16
60
16 40
19
40
17
80
16 60
12 40
14 40
780
800
00
16 60
SL-22B-CR SL-22A-CR SL-19-PD SL-16B-RD SL-16A-RD ) "

639 .2
) "
820
910.6
840
17
16
80
18
80
19
00
19
20
90 0
19
80
14
20
40
17
20
00
17
20
17
40
17
60
80
18
18
00
20
24
24
24
23
20
23
00
70 0
68 0
66 0
64 0
70 0
14
14
13 80
66 0
50
60
13 60
21 62.7 0
15 60
13 6 0
12 20
Den se Tree s
12 00
0 8 11
13 40
58 0
13 00
880
900
58 0
56 0
54 0
14 40
00
00
98 0
96 0
20
Den se Tree s
54
66
74
60
58
56
94
00 80 10 60 10 40 10 20 10 00 10 0 98
40
0
96 0
828 .2
83
11 6 0
40
11
11 2 0
11 6 0 11 4 0
916.2
0
760
680
660
11 0 0
14
40
20 14
15 00
14 20
880 .8 827 .7
14 80
900 .1 989 .1
00 14
13
76
74
Den se Tree s
72 0
70 0
680
0
0
780
70
78 0
12
13
13
13
12
13
12
14
Miles
15 80
80
20
14
00
40
20
60
80
827 .4
8 0
80
82 0
3005 6
40
00
0
84
90
14 4
16 00
14
0
60
826 .4
14
11
990. 81
86
0
72
0
88 0
14
800
0
90
16 20
80
00
0
14 60
Den se Tree s
0
13 80
15
11
94
2 0
00
16 00
15 80
15 60
15
13 60
14
40
14
60
11
11
11
80
Conveyor s
10 80
14
11 2 0
903 .3
4
80
10
900 .6
900
897 .6 899 .6
0
14 2 0
990 .4
98
96
740
82
0
760
70 0
16 40
960 940 920
13 00
60
900 .4
14 0 0
902 .1
12 80
16
60
13
14 60
LEGEND
17 40
80
11 3 0
13
13
898 .9
60
13 40
Pylo n
980
780
800
REFERENCES
PROJECT
20
820
# Surface water sample location *
TITLE
) "
STORM WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS

0 500 1,000 Feet 1,500
(Golder, 2009) Storm water sample location (URS Corporation, June 2008) Facility boundary
FIGURE 6.2
Privileged and Confidential Attorney Client Work Product Prepared in Anticipation of Litigation
Title
Source: SFBRWQCB, 2007

Drawn Checked Reviewed
CR RV BF
Permanente Creek Monitoring Location - PER070 (SFBRWQCB)

Project Name
Hydrologic Investigation Permanente Quarry Rec Plan Update
Project No.
063-7109.500
Date
Client Name
FIGURE
May 2010
6.3
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\ Geochem Figs.xlsx
North Quarry - Wall Washing (November 2009)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.4
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Wall Washing.xlsx
Wall Washing - Graywacke (GW-01)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.5
Wall Washing - Chert Sample (CT-01)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.6
Wall Washing - Greenstone (GS-01)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.7
Wall Washing - Limestone - Medium to High Grade (MG-01)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.8
Wall Washing - Limestone - High Grade (HG-01)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.9
Wall Washing - Limestone - High and Medium/Low Grade (HMG-01)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.10
pH (s.u.)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009
pH (s.u.)
Sept.-Oct. 2009
6 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3
x x
NQ SP
Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
HG-4
HG-6
TDS (mg/L)
2000
NQ North Quarry
1500
1000
500
Concentration (mg/L)
0 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1
x
SW-2
x x
SW-3 NQ SP
SP West Material Storage Area Runoff
HG-4
HG-6
Alkalinity (mg/L)
500
250
0 HG-7 HG-9
x
HG-10
x x
SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 Non-detect values shown at the detection limit. NQ SP "x" - no sample collected.
Drawn Checked
Project No. Date
HG-4
HG-6
Current Water Quality - pH, TDS and Alkalinity

Hydrologic Investigation Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Update 063-7109.500 May 2010
CR FV Reviewed DB/RV
FIGURE
6.11
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Water Quality Eval (Feb 2010).xlsx
Sulfate (mg/L)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009
1,200
800
400
Sept.-Oct. 2009
0 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3
x x
NQ SP
Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
HG-4
HG-6
Nitrate (mg/L-N)
NQ North Quarry
Concentration (mg/L-N)
0 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1
x
SW-2
x x
SW-3 NQ SP
HG-4
HG-6
Chloride (mg/L)
60
40
20
0 HG-7 HG-9
x
HG-10
x x
Drawn CR Checked
Project No. Date
HG-4
HG-6
Current Water Quality - SO4, NO3 and Cl

FV Reviewed DB/RV
FIGURE
6.12
Antimony (g/L)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009 Sept.-Oct. 2009
Concentration (ug/L)
10 8 6 4 2 0
x
HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3
x x
NQ SP
Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
HG-4
HG-6
Arsenic (g/L)
NQ North Quarry SP West Material Storage Area Runoff
10 8 6 4 2 0
x
HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1 SW-2
x x
SW-3 NQ SP
HG-4
HG-6
Selenium (g/L)
100 80 60 40 20 0
x
HG-7 HG-9 HG-10
x x
Drawn CR Checked
Project No. Date
HG-4
HG-6
Current Water Quality - Sb, As and Se

FV Reviewed DB/RV
FIGURE
6.13
Manganese (g/L)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009
1000
100
10
x
x x
NQ SP
Sept.-Oct. 2009 Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
HG-4
HG-6
Molybdenum (g/L)
NQ North Quarry
1000
100
10
1 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1
x x
SW-2 SW-3 NQ SP
HG-4
HG-6
Nickel (g/L)
1000
100
10
1 HG-7 HG-9
x
HG-10
x x
Drawn CR Checked
Project No. Date
HG-4
HG-6
Current Water Quality - Mn, Ni and Mo

FV Reviewed DB/RV
FIGURE
6.14
Vanadium (g/L)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009
1000
100
10
1 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3
NA
NA
NA x NA NA NA
NQ SP
x x
NA
Sept.-Oct. 2009 Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
HG-4
HG-6
Zinc (g/L)
1000
NQ North Quarry
100
10
1 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1
x x
SW-2 SW-3 NQ SP
HG-4
HG-6
NA - sample not analyzed for this parameter
Iron (g/L)
400
300
200
100
x
HG-7 HG-9 HG-10
x x
Drawn CR Checked
Project No. Date
HG-4
HG-6
Current Water Quality - V, Zn and Fe

FV Reviewed DB/RV
FIGURE
6.15
Calcium (mg/L)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009 Sept.-Oct. 2009 Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
400
300
200
100
x
x x
NQ SP
HG-4
HG-6
Magnesium (mg/L)
NQ North Quarry
150
100
50
0 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 SW-1
x x
SW-2 SW-3 NQ SP
HG-4
HG-6
Sodium (mg/L)
1000
100
10
1 HG-7 HG-9
x
HG-10
x x
Drawn CR Checked
Project No. Date
HG-4
HG-6
Current Water Quality - Ca, Mg and Na

FV Reviewed DB/RV
FIGURE
6.16
Mercury (ug/L)
Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009 Sept.-Oct. 2009 Dec. 2009 Jan. 2010
0.1
0.01
NA x
0.001
x x
NQ SP
0.0001
HG-4
HG-6
NQ North Quarry SP West Material Storage Area Runoff NA - sample not analyzed for this parameter
Non-detect values shown at the detection limit.

"x" - no sample collected.
Current Water Quality - Hg

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.17
Water quality results for sampling rounds 1 to 3 included in Piper Plot.
Groundwater and Surface Water Piper Plot

Hydrologic Investigation Permanente Quarry Rec Plan Update
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR RV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
BF
FIGURE
6.18
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Geochem Figs.xlsx
West Material Storage Area North Quarry

10 Field Conductivity (uS/cm) Lab Conductivity (uS/cm) Field pH
1,200
1,000
800
Conductivity (uS/cm)
400
200
0 SL-1-CR Storm Water Monitor Location SL-4-CR SL-5-CR SL-5A-CR SL-11-CR SL-14-CR
SL-BG-CR

pH (s.u.)
600
Permanente Creek - Storm Water Monitoring Data (January 18, 2006)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.19
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Stormwater Data.xlsx
West Material Storage Area North Quarry

10 Field Conductivity (uS/cm) Lab Conductivity (uS/cm) Field pH
1,200
1,000
800
Conductivity (uS/cm)
400
200
0 SL-1-CR Storm Water Monitor Location SL-4-CR SL-5-CR SL-5A-CR SL-11-CR SL-14-CR
SL-BG-CR

pH (s.u.)
600
Permanente Creek - Storm Water Monitoring Data (February 27, 2006)

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.20
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Stormwater Data.xlsx
100
No. of Samples 850 Maximum 4.7% Minimum <0.01% Average 0.09%
200
300
400
500
Histogram
1000 100 10 1 100%
Depth (feet bgs)
600
700
80%
60% 40% 20% 0.1 Sulfide-Sulfur (%) Sulfide-Sulfur (%) 1 10 0%
800
1000
0.01
Frequency
900
Limestone Ore Sulfide-Sulfur Data

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.21
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Pyrite Occurance_.xlsx
10000 TTLC Result Crustal Abundance Standard Detection Limit Standard PQL
Maximum Average Minimum
1000
100
10
Concentration (mg/kg)
0.1
0.01 Ba Be Cd Cr Co Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Ag Tl V Zn STLC Result
Sb
As
0.1
Standard Detection Limit Standard PQL

Maximum Average Minimum
0.01
0.001
0.0001
0.00001 Ba Be B Cd Cr Co Cu Fe Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Ag Tl V Zn
Sb
Al
As
Non-detect for all samples
Non-detect values shown at the detection limit and assumed equal to the detection limit in average calculations. Standard detection limit and practical quantitation limit (PQL) raised for some analytes in one of the six samples analyzed (TTLC analysis).
Overburden (Rock) and Ore - TTLC and STLC Results

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.22
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Waste Rock Data.xlsx
Nickel (mg/kg)
600 0 500 250 0 20 10 0 20 10 0 20 10 0 Overburden - Top Soil Graywacke Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone Chert Fault Breccia Greenstone Metabasalt
1,200
Chromium (mg/kg)
Antimony (mg/kg)
Arsenic (mg/kg)
Selenium (mg/kg)

Overburden (Rock and Soil) and Ore - Elemental Composition

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.23
Antimony
10 8 3
Arsenic Molybdenum
20
16
12
4 1 2 0 0 STLC Concentration (mg/L) 0.005 0.01 0 0 0.01
TTLC Concentration (mg/kg)
0 0.01
0.005
0.02 STLC Concentration (mg/L) Graywacke Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone Chert Fault Breccia
0.03
STLC Concentration (mg/L)
Nickel
16 12 8 4 0 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
Selenium
1600
1200
800
400
Greenstone
Metabasalt Overburden - Soil
0.005
0.01
STLC Concentration (mg/L)
STLC Concentration (mg/L) Non-detect values shown at the detection limit.
Overburden (Rock and Soil) and Ore - TTLC vs. STLC

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.24
4 3 1 2
Wall Washing - Samples

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
DB/RV
FIGURE
6.25
Calcium (mg/L)
400
300
200
100
0 SW-3 SW-1 SW-2 North Quarry Storage Area Runoff Wall Wash - Wall Wash WET WET - Other Limestone Other Limestone
GW-All
Magnesium (mg/L)
160
120
80
40
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Ca and Mg

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.26
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\5_Final Revisions (May 21 2010)\Water Types.xlsx
Sodium (mg/L)
400
200
GW-All
Sulfate (mg/L)
10,000
1,000
100
10
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Na and SO4

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.27
Alkalinity (mg/L)
600
400
200
GW-All
pH (s.u.)
9.0
pH (s.u.)
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0 SW-3 SW-1 SW-2 North Quarry Storage Area Runoff Wall Wash - Wall Wash WET WET - Other Limestone Other Limestone
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Alkalinity and pH

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.28
Antimony (mg/L)
0.0090
0.0060
0.0030
GW-All
Arsenic (mg/L)
0.1
0.01
0.001
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Sb and As

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.29
Iron (mg/L)
10
0.1
0.01
GW-All
Manganese (mg/L)
0.1
0.01
0.001
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Fe and Mn

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.30
Molybdenum (mg/L)
0.1
0.01
0.001
GW-All
Nickel (mg/L)
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Mo and Ni

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
RV/DB
FIGURE
6.31
Selenium (mg/L)
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
SW-3 SW-1 SW-2 North Quarry Storage Area Runoff Wall Wash - Wall Wash WET WET - Other Limestone Other Limestone
0.00
GW-All
Vanadium (mg/L)
0.1
0.01
GW-All
Water Quality Comparison - Se and V

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
CR FV
063-7109.500 May 2010
Reviewed
FIGURE
6.32
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report (Feb 20 2010)\Water Types
APPENDIX A BORING LOGS
L o g o
L o g o
Golder Associates 425 Lakeside Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Telephone: (408) 220-9223 Fax: 0637109.300 phase 2 Lehigh Permanente Air Rotary 1585 ft. MSL DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED SCREEN TYPE/SLOT GRAVEL PACK TYPE GROUT TYPE/QUANTITY
BORING NUMBER HG-1A

PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME LOCATION DRILLING METHOD GROUND ELEVATION TOP OF CASING LOGGED BY REMARKS
10/26/08 10/27/08 -------------
Santa Clara, CA
CASING TYPE/DIAMETER
---Ian Thomsen
Air rotary drilling to 580 feet using a 6'' drill bit.
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
TEMPLATE HG1-11.GPJ LOG A EWNN01.GDT 5/20/10
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580
Clayey mud OVERBURDEN.
60.0 loose limestone/greenstone/chert GRAVEL. Water at 73.4 feet. 100.0 GREYWACKE.
220.0 GREYWACKE/GREENSTONE. GREYWACKE. 240.0
400.0 Brecciated greywacke GOUGE. Very muddy.
495.0 Fracture, cherty LIMESTONE with greywacke producing 200gpm of water.
580.0 Bottom of borehole at 580.0 feet.
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
L o g o
L o g o
Golder Associates 425 Lakeside Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Telephone: (408) 220-9223 Fax: 0637109.300 phase 2 Lehigh Permanente Air Rotary 1613 ft. MSL DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED SCREEN TYPE/SLOT GRAVEL PACK TYPE GROUT TYPE/QUANTITY 10/29/08
BORING NUMBER HG-2

PAGE 1 OF 1
11/6/08 -------------
Santa Clara, CA
---Jill Dekoekkoek
Air rotary drilling to 560 feet using a 6'' drill bit.
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560
OVERBURDEN. 25.0 Very Dark-Medium Brown Cherty LIMESTONE with reaction to HCl.
VWT Very Dark GREYWACKE with some light brown limestone.
365.0
490.0 LIMESTONE with chert.
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
L o g o
L o g o
BORING NUMBER HG-3

PAGE 1 OF 1
11/9/08 -------------
Santa Clara, CA
---Jill Dekoekkoek
Air rotary drilling to 460 feet using a 5.25'' drill bit.
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460
OVERBURDEN. 20.0 Medium-dark grey LIMESTONE with some chert and trace greenstone/greywacke
150.0 Brecciated FAULT GOUGE with calcite veining in the medium grey limestone.
200.0 Dark brown to dark grey LIMESTONE and greywacke. Very low sample recovery.
VWT
420.0 GREENSTONE with trace chert, limestone, and calcite.
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
L o g o
L o g o
Golder Associates 425 Lakeside Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Telephone: (408) 220-9223 Fax: 0637109.300 phase 2 Lehigh Permanente Air Rotary 1857 ft. MSL DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED SCREEN TYPE/SLOT GRAVEL PACK TYPE GROUT TYPE/QUANTITY 11/10/08 11/12/08
WELL NUMBER HG-4

PAGE 1 OF 1
Santa Clara, CA
Schedule 80 pvc / 2 inches
slotted screen / 0.020 #3 sand 5% bentonite
1859.5 ft. MSL Jill Dekoekkoek
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
WELL DIAGRAM
GRAB
OVERBURDEN. 10 20 30 40 50 55.0 GREENSTONE. Dark greenish brown BASALT. 24.0
GRAB
60 70 80 90 100
GRAB
110 120 130 140 150 5% bentonite grout 2'' sch. 80 pvc
GRAB
160 170 180 190 200
GRAB
210 220 230 240 Water at 240 feet.
GRAB
250 260 270 280 290 300 300.0 Bottom of borehole at 300.0 feet. Bentonite #3 sand filter pack 0.020'' slotted screen
L o g o
L o g o
BORING NUMBER HG-5

PAGE 1 OF 1
11/20/08 -------------
Santa Clara, CA
---Jill Dekoekkoek
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50
OVERBURDEN. 25.0 GREENSTONE producing ~1/16-1/32 gpm of water after a 1/2 hour air evacuation.
GRAB
60 70 80 90 100
GRAB
110 120 130 140 150
GRAB
160 170 180 190 200
GRAB
210 220 230 240 250 VWT
GRAB
260 270 280
290 300 GRAB 310 320 330 340 350 GRAB 360 370 380 390 400 Bottom of borehole at 400.0 feet. 400.0
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
L o g o
L o g o
WELL NUMBER HG-6

PAGE 1 OF 1
Santa Clara, CA
1825 ft. MSL Jill Dekoekkoek
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
WELL DIAGRAM
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50
OVERBURDEN. 25.0 Weathered BASALT. 45.0 GREENSTONE gouge with trace calcite.
GRAB
60 70 80 90 100
GRAB
110 120 130 140 150 5% bentonite grout 2'' sch. 80 pvc
GRAB
160 170 180 190 200
GRAB
210 220 230 240 250 Bentonite #3 sand filter pack 0.020'' slotted screen
GRAB
260 270 280 290 300
GRAB
310 320 330 340 350 collapse/slough
GRAB
360 370 380 390 400 Bottom of borehole at 400.0 feet. 400.0
L o g o
L o g o
WELL NUMBER HG-7

PAGE 1 OF 1
Santa Clara, CA
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
WELL DIAGRAM
GRAB
OVERBURDEN. 10 20 30 40 50 40.0 BASALT. 60.0 Purple GREENSTONE/GREYWACKE. Bentonite #3 sand filter pack 5% bentonite grout 2'' sch. 80 pvc
GRAB
60 70 80 90 100
Water at 80 feet.
GRAB
110 120 130 140 150 0.020'' slotted screen
GRAB
160 170 180 190 200 200.0 GREYWACKE with trace calcite. collapse/slough
GRAB
210 220 230 240 250
GRAB
260 270 280 290 300 300.0 Bottom of borehole at 300.0 feet.
L o g o
L o g o
BORING NUMBER HG-8

PAGE 1 OF 1
11/23/08 -------------
Santa Clara, CA
---Jill Dekoekkoek
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
OVERBURDEN. GRAB 10 20 30 40 50 GRAB 60 70 80 90 100 GRAB 110 120 130 140

40.0 GREENSTONE with greywacke and trace calcite. Producing 2-4gpm of water during evacuation immediately after drilling.
Water at 120 feet.
150 GRAB 160 170 180 190 200
VWT
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
L o g o
L o g o
WELL NUMBER HG-9

PAGE 1 OF 1
Santa Clara, CA
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
WELL DIAGRAM
OVERBURDEN. GRAB 10 20 30 40 50 GRAB 60 70 80 Bentonite 90 100 GRAB 110 120 130 140
25.0 Oxidized GREENSTONE, greywacke and trace calcite producing water at 200gpm. 5% bentonite grout 2'' sch. 80 pvc
Water at 100 feet.
#3 sand filter pack 0.020'' slotted screen
150 GRAB collapse/slough 160 170 180 190 200 200.0 Bottom of borehole at 200.0 feet.
L o g o
L o g o
WELL NUMBER HG-10S

PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME LOCATION DRILLING METHOD GROUND ELEVATION TOP OF CASING LOGGED BY REMARKS JL/GW
10/11/09 Schedule 80 pvc / 2 inches slotted screen / 0.020 #3 sand 5% bentonite
Santa Clara, CA
1587.5 ft. MSL
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
WELL DIAGRAM
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580
OVERBURDEN with limestone gravel fragments.
85.0 loose GRAVEL containing limestone and trace greenstone/greywacke. Produces 20gpm, very soft. 120.0 LIMESTONE with trace greenstone. 160.0 GREYWACKE with trace greenstone. Very soft, possibly collapsing in this interval.
5% bentonite/cement grout 2'' sch. 80 pvc Bentonite chips #3 sand filter pack 0.020'' slotted screen
220.0 GREENSTONE/GREYWACKE GOUGE. Soft, clayey fault gouge.
310.0 GREYWACKE with trace greenstone and limestone. Increased competence with depth.
slough/collapse
510.0 LIMESTONE. Well indurated, low-grade limestone with very little circulation.
L o g o
L o g o
Golder Associates 425 Lakeside Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Telephone: (408) 220-9223 Fax: 0637109.300 phase 2 Lehigh Permanente Air Rotary 1585 ft. MSL DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED SCREEN TYPE/SLOT GRAVEL PACK TYPE
BORING NUMBER HG-10M D

PAGE 1 OF 1
8/6/09 10/11/09 ---------5% bentonite
Santa Clara, CA
GROUT TYPE/QUANTITY
---JL/GW
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580
See Log for HG-10S
VWT 10int
VWT 10d
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
L o g o
L o g o
WELL NUMBER HG-11

PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME LOCATION DRILLING METHOD GROUND ELEVATION TOP OF CASING LOGGED BY REMARKS JL/GW
Santa Clara, CA
1587.5 ft. MSL
Air rotary drilling from 0-200 feet using 18'' drill bit, from 200-600 using a 14'' bit.
Water Level
SAMPLING METHOD
VWT Depth
CONTACT DEPTH
GRAPHIC LOG
DEPTH (ft. BGL)
WELL DIAGRAM
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
GRAB
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600
OVERBURDEN. Gravel with fractured pieces of limestone.
80.0 Grey LIMESTONE with trace greenstone.
5% bentonite/cement grout
160.0 GREYWACKE with trace greenstone. 190.0 GREENSTONE 220.0 GREYWACKE. Competence increases with depth.
Bentonite chips
6'' sch. 80 pvc
300.0 CHERT and QUARTZ gouge. Soft. GREYWACKE. Heavily fractured, 80% mud, 20% fine-grained gravel. 315.0
#6 sand filter pack
480.0 GREYWACKE, LIMESTONE, and GREENSTONE mixture of rock types. CHERTY LIMESTONE. Well indurated. 500.0
Loss of circulation. Fracture zone.
565.0
0.020'' slotted screen
APPENDIX B HYDROGRAPHS
1500
27.0
Start step-rate pumping test Start constant-rate pumping test
1490
Recovery from constant-rate pumping test
26.0
1480
25.0
Temporary pumping for water supply during drilling of HG-11 24.0
1470
1460
HG-10 S PW Groundwater Trend Cumulative Precipitation (inches)

Climate station ID: LSA near Los Altos Hill. Data obtained from http://cdec.water.ca.gov
23.0
1440 9/24 9/29 10/4
21.0
9/14
9/19
Date
10/9
10/14
10/19
10/24
10/29
HG-10 S PW Hydrograph
Hydrologic Investigation Lehigh Permanente
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.1
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Ext_500\Pumping Test\
Cumulative Precipitation from October 2008 (inches)

22.0
1450
1475 Lose circulation in HG-11 at approximately 1,015 feet amsl during drilling
26.5
1465
Continue development of HG-10 S PW by bailing and surging Begin airlifting HG-10 S PW Inject 2,000 gallons of water in HG-10 S PW for a falling-head test Start step-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW Start constant-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW Recovery from constant-rate pumping test
Natural water level decline
26.0
25.5 25.0 24.5 24.0 23.5
1455
1445
1435
1425
1415
1405
HG-10 INT VWT
23.0
22.5 22.0
Groundwater Trend
1385
1375 9/9 9/19 9/29 10/9 10/19 10/29
21.5
8/30
Date
HG-10 INT VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.2
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Ext_500\
1395
1550 HG-10 D VWT
26.5
1500
26
25.5 25 24.5 24 23.5
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
23
22.5 22 21.5 9/9 9/19 9/29 10/9 10/19 10/29
1100
1050
8/30
Date
HG-10 D VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.3
1150
Transducer elevation = 1,090 feet amsl
1435 Natural water level decline Start of step-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW End of step-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW Start of constant-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW
26.5
1434
26.0
25.5 25.0 24.5 24.0 23.5
1433
1432
1431
1430
1429
1428
End of constant-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW
23.0
22.5 22.0
GT4-25A
1426
1425 9/9 9/19
21.5 9/29 10/9 10/19 10/29
8/30
Date
GT4-25a VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.4
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Ext_500\Pumping Testt
1427
Groundwater Trend
1470
30
1465
25
1460
1455
20
1450 15
1445
1440
GT4-25A
1435
10
Groundwater Trend
1425 0 6/1/08 9/9/08 12/18/08 3/28/09 7/6/09 10/14/09 1/22/10
1420
2/22/08
Date
GT4-25a VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.5

5
1430
1481.5 Natural water level decline Start of step-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW End of step-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW Start of constant-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW 25.0 26.0
27.0
1480.5
1479.5
1478.5
1477.5 24.0 End of constant-rate pumping test in HG-10 S PW
1476.5
1475.5
GT3-4
23.0
1474.5
22.0
1473.5
1472.5 9/9 9/19
21.0 9/29 10/9 10/19 10/29
8/30
Date
GT3-4 VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.6
Groundwater Trend
1515
30
1510 25
1505
1500
20
1495 15
1490
1485
GT3-4
10
Groundwater Trend
1480
1475
1470 6/1/08 9/9/08 12/18/08
0 3/28/09 7/6/09 10/14/09 1/22/10
2/22/08
Date
GT3-4 VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.7

5
1738.0
27
1737.8
26
1737.6 25
1737.4 24
1737.2
23
1737.0
HG-4 MW
Groundwater Trend
1736.8
1736.6 9/14 9/24 10/4 10/14 10/24
21
9/4
Date
HG-4 MW Hydrograph
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.8

22
27
1659.1
1658.9
26
1658.7

25
1658.5 24
1658.3
1658.1
23
HG-6 MW
1657.9
Groundwater Trend
1657.7
1657.5 9/14 9/24 10/4 10/14 10/24
21
9/4
Date
HG-6 MW Hydrograph
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.10

22
1560.0
27
1555.0
26
1550.0
25
1545.0
24
1540.0
23
HG-5 VWT
1530.0 12/18 2/6 3/28 5/17 7/6 8/25 10/14
21 12/3
9/9
10/29
Date
HG-5 VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.9

22
1535.0
1204.6
27
1204.5
26
1204.4 Natural water level decline
1204.3
25
1204.2 24
1204.1
1204.0
HG-7 MW
1203.9
23
Groundwater Trend
1203.7
1203.6 9/14 9/24 10/4 10/14 10/24
21
9/4
Date
HG-7 MW Hydrograph
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.11

22
1203.8
1034.0
30.0
1033.5
25.0
20.0
1033.0 15.0
1032.5
10.0

1031.5 2/20/09 4/11/09 5/31/09 7/20/09 9/8/09 10/28/09
0.0
1/1/09
Date
HG-8 VWT Hydrograph

Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.12
Cumulative Precipitation since August 2008 (inches)

5.0
1032.0 HG-8 VWT
1176.8
27.0
1176.7
Natural water level decline 26.0
1176.6
1176.5
25.0
1176.4 24.0
1176.3
1176.2
1176.1
HG-9 MW
23.0
Groundwater Trend
1175.9 21.0 9/14 9/24 10/4 10/14 10/24
1175.8
9/4
Date
HG-9 MW Hydrograph
Project No. Date
Drawn Checked
DH GW
063-7109-500 March 2, 2010
Reviewed
DB
FIGURE
C.13
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Ext_500\Pumping Test

22.0
1176.0
APPENDIX C PACKER TEST RESULTS
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: 3/27/2009 To: Bill Fowler From: Rick Booth cc: George Wegmann RE: PACKER TEST RESULTS, LEHIGH HANSON PERMANENTE QUARRY, CUPERTINO, CA In October and November 2008, a total of nine (9) boreholes were drilled in order to characterize the geology and hydrogeology of the project area. The borings were drilled to depths ranging from Project No.: 0637109 Company: Golder Associates
approximately 200 to 500 feet below grade and the cuttings were logged by a Golder geologist. The hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock encountered in borehole was tested using a downhole straddle packer set up. After the completion of the packer tests, four (4) monitoring wells were constructed in four of the boreholes for long term groundwater level and water quality monitoring. Vibrating wire transducers (VWT) were installed in the remaining boreholes except for boring HG-1, which could not be instrumented because of borehole instability. Borehole HG-1 was abandoned by filling with grout. The VWT
installations involved attaching the VWTs and their cables to a string of PVC pipe as it was inserted into the borehole; and then fully-grouting the hole, using the PVC string as a tremmie pipe. A total of fourteen (14) tests were analyzed from boreholes HG-2, HG-3, HG-4, HG-5, HG-8, and HG-9. Tests were conducted in boreholes HG-6 and HG-7; however, the tests could not be analyzed due to packer failure (poor borehole conditions prevented an adequate packer seal) or downhole transducer failure when the tubing could not be filled to surface. Every test consisted of a stabilization period after packer inflation followed by a constant rate injection test and a recovery phase.
Interval transmissivity was estimated using HydroBench. HydroBench is a pressure transient interpretation package developed by Golder Associates using the methodology of the Bourdet derivative (Bourdet et al. 1983), coupled with a library of analytical and reservoir models. The software allows the simultaneous analysis of different hydrogeological test phases such as Constant Rate Injection Tests, Slug and Pulse Tests. The derivative of pressure (i.e., rate of pressure change) with respect to the natural logarithm of time that has shown to significantly improve the diagnostic and quantitative analysis of slug and constant-rate pumping tests (Spane and Wurstner, 1993).
Hydraulic conductivity was computed by dividing the simulated interval transmissivity by the interval length. This implies the entire test interval length contributes equally to the test transmissivity and does not account for the scenario of a highly conductive feature in a relatively low permeable matrix. This scenario can be interpreted from long duration interference tests, which was not part of this scope of work.
3/27/09 B. Fowler Ptest TM
Skin effect was encountered in most tests. Skin effect is due to a zone surrounding the borehole that has a lower permeability than the formation at large. This acts as a skin around the wellbore, causing a lower apparent transmissivity than the formation represents. This apparent lower transmissivity is The steady state
reflected in the steady state approximation derived from the Theim equation.
approximation, as shown on Table 1, is consistently up to -order of magnitude lower than the transmissivity simulated in HydroBench. HydroBench accounts for the skin effect and removes it from the simulation.
Hydraulic conductivity ranged from 1E-04 m/sec in borehole HG-9 from 66 to 94 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) to 2E-07 m/sec in borehole HG-2 from 421.9 to 450.6 ft bgs. The mean hydraulic conductivity of all tests is 1E-05 m/sec. The HydroBench pressure and derivative curve matches are attached as Figures 1-14. A summary of test results is presented in Table 1.
References Bourdet, D., Whittle, T.M. Douglas, A.A., Pirard, Y.M., 1983; A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis. World Oil, May 1983. Pp. 95 106 Spane, Wurstner, 1993. DERIV: A Computer Program for Calculating Pressure Derivatives for Use in Hydraulic Test Analysis. Ground Water, September, 1993. Attachments Table 1: Summary of Test Results Figures 1 14: HydroBench Pressure and Derivative Curves
3/27/09 B. Fowler Ptest TM
Table1 SummaryofTestResults LehighPermanente Quarry Cupertino,CA March2009
Test Number PackerSetup Test Type
Top (ftbgs)
Bottom (ftbgs)
Interval Length (ft)
Hydraulic Conductivity2 (m/sec)
TheimSteadyStateApprox.3 ConstantFlow Transmissivity Rate dP (gpm) (psi) (m2/sec)
HG1a
HG2
HG3
HG4
HG5
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 1 2
505.35 463.9 421.9 379.9 400 358.9 295.89 274 211.89 337.9 253.9
554 492.6 450.6 408.6 453 387.6 324.56 296.6 240.56 366.5 283.6
48.65 28.7 28.7 28.7 53 28.7 28.67 22.6 28.67 28.6 29.7
SinglePacker DoublePacker DoublePacker DoublePacker SinglePacker DoublePacker DoublePacker SinglePacker DoublePacker DoublePacker DoublePacker
CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI CRI
2.E06 2.E06 2.E07 9.E06 9.E06 4.E07 2.E05 <7.E07 9.E07 8.E07 4.E07
22.5 16.5 2.4 27.0 14.0 9.0 15.0 <2 1.8 2.5 0.8
76 243 215 82 8 197 17 75 48 60 52
2.E05 5.E06 8.E07 2.E05 1.E04 3.E06 6.E05 <2.E6 3.E06 3.E06 1.E06
HG6 HG7 178 115 94 29 29 28 DoublePacker DoublePacker DoublePacker CRI CRI CRI
HG8
HG9
1 2 1
149 86 66
Transmissivity Analysis 1 (m2/sec) Match NoTests Recovery 4.E05 Recovery 2.E05 Injection 2.E06 Recovery 8.E05 Injection 1.E04 Recovery 4.E06 Injection 2.E04 Injection <5.E06 Injection 8.E06 Injection 7.E06 Injection 4.E06 NoTests NoTests Injection 1.E05 Injection 1.E04 Injection 9.E04 1.E06 1.E05 1.E04 5.0 21.0 21.4 56 49 6
6.E06 3.E05 2.E04
ftbgs CRI gpm dP 1 2 3
feetbelowgroundsurface ConstantRateInjection GallonsPerMinute Changeinpressureinducedduringthetest. AnalysisMatchreferstotheportionofthepressurecurvethatwasusedtofittheHydroBenchsimulation. Conductivitycalculatedbymultiplyingthetransmissivitybytheintervallength TheimSteadyStateEquation:T=Q*ln(Ri/Rew)/2(PI)H,whereQ=flowrate,Ri=boreholeradius,Rew=radiusofinfluence(assumed10meters),H=dP
HG2 Test1(505.35to554feet)
Pressure psi 1.E+02 HG-2 / Run 1 / REC: LogLog Plot
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi
HG-2 / Run 1 / REC: SemiLog Plot
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0 1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:7.69psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 3.509e05m/s 1.041e05 m 2.5580 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 4.625e08m/Pa 9.8944 REC: 4.625e08m/Pa 9.8944
HG2 Test2(463.9to492.6feet)
Pressure psi 1.E+03 HG-2 / Test 2 / REC: LogLog Plot
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 1.E+03
HG-2 / Test 2 / REC: LogLog Plot
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
StaticPressure:14.17psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 1.680e05m/s 1e4 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 2.870e08m/Pa 9.7315 REC: 6.692e08m/Pa 9.7315
Pressure psi 1.E+03 HG-2 / Test 3 / CRI: LogLog Plot
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi
HG-2 / Test 3 / CRI: SemiLog Plot
225.0 200.0 175.0 150.0 125.0 100.0 75.0 50.0 25.0 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 1.E+02 HG-2 / Test 4 / REC: LogLog Plot
1.E+01
1.E+00 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 hrs Time
Pressure psi 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 1.E-03
HG-2 / Test 4 / REC: SemiLog Plot
1.E-02
Pressure psi 170.0 160.0 150.0 140.0 130.0 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.08
HG-2 / Test 4 / Test Pressures
1.E-01 hrs Time
0.10
0.13
0.15
0.18
0.20
0.23
0.25
hrs Time
HG2 Test4(379.9to408.6feet) ================================= StaticPressure:16.71psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 7.732e05m/s 1e4 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 2.214e8m/Pa 9.9976 REC: 7.159e08m/Pa 9.9976
HG3 Test1(400to453feet)
Pressure psi 1.E+02 HG-3 / Test 1 / CRI2: LogLog Plot
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 22.0
HG-3 / Test 1 / CRI2: SemiLog Plot
21.0
20.0
19.0
18.0
17.0
16.0
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:12.38psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 1.377e04m/s 1.000e04 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin CRI2: 4.406e07m/Pa 0.2314 REC2: 1.000e11m/Pa 0.2314
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 190.0 180.0 170.0 160.0 150.0 140.0 130.0 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:0.80psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 3.667e06m/s 1.000e05 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 5.117e08m/Pa 1.6058
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
StaticPressure:12.40psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 1.942e04m/s 1e4 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 2.726e06m/Pa 10.0000 REC: 2.798e07m/Pa 10.0000
HG4 Test1(274to296.6feet)
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 hrs Time
Pressure psi 210.0 200.0 190.0 180.0 170.0 160.0 150.0 140.0 130.0 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:82.67psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 4.861e06m/s 1e4 m 2.3435 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 1.760e07m/Pa 9.9931 REC: 3.370e09m/Pa 9.9931
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 170.0 165.0 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:102.81psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 8.195e06m/s 1.000e04 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 9.637e09m/Pa 7.1146 REC1: 4.313e08m/Pa 7.1146
Pressure psi 1.E+02 HG-5 / Test 1 / RI: LogLog Plot
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi
HG-5 / Test 1 / RI: SemiLog Plot
200.0
190.0
180.0
170.0
160.0
150.0
140.0 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:137.5psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 6.659e06m/s 8.914e04 m 2.3030 C(WBS) Skin RI: 2.848e08m/Pa 9.6946 REC: 9.309e07m/Pa 9.6946
Pressure psi 1.E+02 HG-5 / Test 2 / RI: LogLog Plot
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 170.0 165.0 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 1.E-03
HG-5 / Test 2 / RI: SemiLog Plot
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:107.28psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 3.543e06m/s 1.125e05 m 1.8516 C(WBS) Skin RI: 7.500e09m/Pa 10.0000 REC: 9.687e07m/Pa 10.0000
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 1.E+02 HG-8 / Test 2 / REC1: LogLog Plot
1.E+01
1.E+00 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 hrs Time
Pressure psi 65.0 62.5 60.0 57.5 55.0 52.5 50.0 47.5 45.0 42.5 40.0
HG-8 / Test 2 / REC1: SemiLog Plot
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:20.25psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 1.015e04m/s 9.372e05 m 2 C(WBS) Skin CRI: 1.570e07m/Pa 9.9999 REC1: 1.834e07m/Pa 9.9999 REC2: 9.974e07m/Pa 9.9999
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03
1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 hrs Time
Pressure psi 58.5 58.0 57.5 57.0 56.5 56.0 55.5 55.0 54.5 54.0
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00 hrs Time
================================= StaticPressure:52.57psi Transm. Storativ. Radius FlowDim. Shell1: 8.974e04m/s 1.813e04 m 2.0000 C(WBS) Skin REC: 8.512e11m/Pa 10.0000 CRI: 4.978e07m/Pa 10.0000
APPENDIX D GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY RESULTS
May 2010 Water Quality Monitoring Results
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 1 of 9
HG-4 9-Feb-09
HG-4 14-Apr-09
HG-4 26-Oct-09
HG-4 4-Jan-10
HG-6 9-Feb-09
HG-6 14-Apr-09
HG-6 29-Oct-09
HG-6 4-Jan-10
HG-7 15-Apr-09
HG-7 27-Oct-09
HG-7 DUP 27-Oct-09
HG-7 29-Dec-09
HG-9 9-Feb-09
HG-9 15-Apr-09
Dissolved Metals
Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) <38 <0.17 J B B J J+ J,J+ J <0.13 0.013 J <0.13 <0.13 J J <38 <0.23 <38 <0.23 <38 <0.17 <38 <0.17 <38 0.62 <38 <0.17 <38 <0.17 <38 0.27
g/L g/L
<38 0.43
<38 <0.23
<38 0.17
<38 0.47
J J,J+ J,J+ J
<38 0.67
J+ B
J B
Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) <0.13 0.014 J 0.017 J <0.13
g/L g/L g/L g/L 8.7 7.4 <0.18 260 2.6 120 0.052 2.0 130 <0.046 60 B,J,J+ 0.62 240 <0.18 46 0.62 250 <0.18 64 4.2 120 <0.046 27 B,J,J+ 2.2 120 <0.18 <9.7 2.4 120 <0.18 <9.7
2.8 39 0.064 -
J,J+
3.5 21 0.061 250
J B
9.4 14 <0.18 270
2 110 <0.18 21 <0.13
1.1 30 0.064 0.053
1.5 J 22 <0.046 21 B,J,J+ J 0.040 J
Cadmium (Cd)
g/L
0.2
0.052
<0.13
Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI)
g/L g/L B J J <0.55 <0.70 <0.64 <0.7 3.2 <0.7 <0.55 <0.70 <0.55 <0.70 0.94 <0.7 2.1 <0.70
<0.64 <0.7
4.0 <0.7
20 <0.70
1.4 <0.70
<0.55 <0.70
0.68 1.4
J J
1.9 <0.7
Copper (Cu) 16 J <7.2 21 J,J+ 46 J 34 J 330 310
g/L 0.8 J 0.58 J 0.93 J,J+ <0.68 <0.68 0.43 J,J+ <0.68
3.6
3.1
7.7
<0.68 310
<0.68 290
4.0 <7.2
0.67 <7.2
J,J+
Iron (Fe)
g/L
<7.2
33
J,J+
13
Lead (Pb) <0.054 19 46 58 33 41 320 <0.019 0.12 J,J+ <0.054 <0.054 0.038 B,J,J+
g/L
0.28
0.26
0.76
<0.054 330
<0.054 320
<0.054 320
<0.019 17
0.038 B,J,J+ 6.7
Manganese (Mn)
g/L
120
90
110
Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) B B,J B <0.23 <0.38 <0.38 2.1 0.54 J 0.47 J J+ J+ 1.3 3.9 <0.23 J 0.86
g/L g/L g/L 0.0106 33 <0.016 0.00631 3.6 <0.016 0.00234 2.5 0.00064 1.3 0.00068 2.5
<0.016 0.0126 31
<0.016 0.0226 43
0.0135 45
<0.016 0.0677 0.74 B,J,J+ 3.1 <0.23
0.0235 0.62 1.7 <0.38
J,J+ J
0.0221 0.54 1.7 <0.38 J J,J+
J,J+ J
0.0135 0.81 2.6 <0.38 J
J,J+
<0.016 0.0244 3.7 2.9 0.9 J
<0.016 0.00384 3.2 2.6 0.73
Nickel (Ni)
g/L
3.8
7.7
24
Selenium (Se)
g/L
0.27
B,J
0.32
1.1
Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 B J <0.028 0.1 B J <0.028 <0.054 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2
g/L g/L g/L
<0.028 0.088 -
B J
<0.028 0.20 -
J,J+
<0.065 0.23 11
<0.065 <0.11 <1.2
<0.028 0.17 -
0.81 <0.11 <1.2 B,J
0.42 <0.11 <1.2
<0.065 <0.11 <1.2 J
<0.028 <0.054 J+
<0.028 0.19 -
J,J+
g/L
B,J+
B B B
Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Metals
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
19 100 21 340 9.6 37
4.8 73 13 370 8.8 33
32 21 3.8 300 7.1 35
<1.9 14 2.4 260 6.3 33
3.2 B,J,J+ 37 70 B 18 B 2 59
5.2 38 75 17 1.7 61
2.4 39 77 17 1 67
<1.9 37 72 17 1.1 62
1.3 110 42 21 0.93 25
J,J+
<1.9 110 43 21 0.93 26
3 110 45 21 0.91 26
<1.9 100 41 20 0.94 23
19 88 29 31 3.2 18
8.7 100 31 21 2.4 22
J B
J B J J J B
J J J J J J J J J,J+
Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) 0.12 J 0.15 J
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L 3,500 <0.20 11 13 <0.20 270 2,900 0.3 2.5 180 <0.060 -
6,100 1.1 2.6 250 0.064 -
B J,J+
1,800 <0.23 3.7 27 <0.060 260
4,800 <0.20 8.4 21 <0.20 280
2,900 <0.23 2.6 140 <0.060 71 0.077
230 <0.20 <1.1 270 <0.20 60 J <0.11
75 <0.20 <1.1 250 <0.20 66 <0.11
39,000 0.56 15 490 1.0 220 0.75
36,000 0.47 9.7 330 0.81 12 J 0.28
47,000 0.44 11 350 0.94 17 J 0.35
17,000 0.48 5 250 0.36 28 J 0.16
1,500 0.76 1.1 59 0.1 J 0.17
750 <0.23 1.5 28 <0.060 110 J 0.075
J B B J
Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd)
g/L
0.49
0.077
0.17
Table D-1 - Report.xlsx
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 2 of 9
Q J+
Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr)
g/L
HG-4 9-Feb-09 45
HG-4 14-Apr-09 14
J+
HG-4 26-Oct-09 86
HG-4 4-Jan-10 30
HG-6 9-Feb-09 22
HG-6 14-Apr-09 14
HG-6 29-Oct-09 <0.64
HG-6 4-Jan-10 <0.64
HG-7 15-Apr-09 430
HG-7 27-Oct-09 320
HG-7 DUP 27-Oct-09 360
HG-7 29-Dec-09 130
HG-9 9-Feb-09 6.5
HG-9 15-Apr-09 <1.6
Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) 6,400 B 5,800 5,500 460 160 84,000 53,000 69,000 22,000
g/L 7.7 12 4.8 J+ 1.3 J <0.66 51 35 36 14
28
4.1
J+
19
12 3,200
4.1 1,900
J+
Total Recoverable Iron (Fe)
g/L
12,000
3,400
9,800
Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) 1.3 73 B B,J+ B J <0.54 <0.088 <0.11 <2.6 B,J B 0.26 0.14 J J 0.14 0.12 91 0.90 J <0.54 J J J,J+ <0.54 <0.088 <0.11 <2.6 J+ B,J+ J B 160 100 B 44 42 B 1,300 B 1,100 1,200 J B 0.96 J 0.18 J <0.19 0.72 B,J 13 8.3 9
g/L
0.26
1.2
3.2 620 J B
1.6 88 J
0.15 41
J B,J+
Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn)
g/L
290
94
180
Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) 1.3 <0.088 <0.11 11 B <0.064 <0.054 <0.064 <0.054 J <0.50 <0.50
g/L g/L g/L <0.016 57 26 <0.016 2.5 15 <0.016 1.8 10 <0.016 1.4 1.8 <0.016 1.7 1.2 <0.016 2.2 420 0.058 1.9 310
0.042 37 37
B,J
<0.016 58 14
B B
<0.016 59 67
0.092 2 350 <0.54 0.15 0.12 100
0.022 1.8 120 <0.54 J J <0.088 <0.11 38
0.018 3.9 7.8 1.1 <0.064 <0.054 -
<0.016 1.9 4.8 J <0.50 <0.064 <0.054 -
B,J+ J+
Total Recoverable Selenium (Se)
g/L
0.94
<0.50
<0.54
Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V)
g/L g/L g/L
0.5 0.15 -
J J
<0.064 <0.054 -
<0.088 <0.11 32
g/L
B,J+
Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) B ND ND ND ND ND ND
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
68 140 31 390 11
58 70 16 380 9.3
40 27 11 320 7.5
14 18 7.6 260 6.5
32 47 82 19 2.2
16 44 88 19 1.9
8.7 41 81 17 1.1
3.2 41 80 17 1.1
99 120 91 37 5.4
79 130 93 24 5.2 -
86 130 110 23 5.7 -
35 120 64 21 3.7 -
37 97 32 38 3.6 ND ND
19 120 35 23 2.8 ND ND
Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) <0.23 <0.23 0.48 J <0.24 -
ND ND
ND ND
Bromoform
g/L
<0.24
<0.24
<0.24 <0.23
1.1 0.94 J+
<0.24 0.24 J,J+
Chloroform
g/L
<0.23
<0.23
g/L g/L J 230 6.9 200 25 24 25 470 <2.5 380 460 <2.5 380 31 J+ 2.5 B,J,J+ 0.4 0.34 J J <0.23 0.24
<0.23 <0.12
<0.23 0.41
470 <2.5 380 25 B
460 <2.5 380 25
<0.23 0.30 <1.1 480 <2.5 390 47
J B
480 <2.5 400 46
480 <2.5 390 46
430 <2.5 350 45
2.6 <0.12 16 360 <2.5 290 46 J+
0.41 0.48 <1.1 410 <2.5 340 32
J J B
g/L
22
J+
4.1 B,J,J+
Dibromochloromethane Toluene SVOCs bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3)
mg/L mg/L mg/L
280 <5.0 230
250 <2.5 210
220 11 200
Chloride
mg/L
51
41
28
Fluoride 380 45
mg/L
0.32
0.39
0.55
0.58
0.073 11 380
0.080 15 400
<0.010 8.6 410
0.13 16 390
0.18 31 440
0.2 31 450
0.2 30 460
0.25 29 430
0.30 48 340
0.37 38 390
Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3)
mg/L mg/L
770 340
770 240
500 69
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 3 of 9
HG-4 9-Feb-09 880 70 J+ H J+ H J+ J J 490 81 470 91 460 3.3 460 2 550 1,100 530 840 580 1,000 530 400 480 88
HG-4 14-Apr-09
HG-4 26-Oct-09
HG-4 4-Jan-10
HG-6 9-Feb-09
HG-6 14-Apr-09
HG-6 29-Oct-09
HG-6 4-Jan-10
HG-7 15-Apr-09
HG-7 27-Oct-09
HG-7 DUP 27-Oct-09
HG-7 29-Dec-09
HG-9 9-Feb-09
HG-9 15-Apr-09 490 34
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
mg/L mg/L
1,500 190
1,500 290
1,000 840
H B J J J+
J J
H J J
J J J+
J,J+
Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide
mg/L mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L mg/L
<0.10 0.21 0.068 0.01 0.4 <0.050
<0.10 0.28 <0.026 <0.0081 0.37 0.13
<0.10 0.28 <0.026 0.014 0.45 0.24
<0.10 0.17 <0.026 <0.0081 0.49 1
<0.10 0.084 0.051 0.012 0.12 <0.050
<0.10 0.094 <0.026 <0.0081 0.077 <0.050
<0.10 H 0.064 <0.026 0.012 B,J,J+ <0.016 <0.050
<0.10 0.057 <0.026 0.031 <0.016 <0.050
<0.10 0.090 <0.026 <0.0081 0.64 0.15
<0.50 H 0.18 <0.026 0.0099 B,J,J+ 0.51 <0.25
<0.50 H 0.042 J <0.026 0.0094 B,J,J+ 0.63 <0.25
<0.10 0.035 0.026 <0.0081 0.21 <0.050
<0.10 0.037 1.3 0.0087 0.19 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 0.72 <0.0081 0.044 <0.050
pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C)
s.u. umhos/cm
8.04 1,900
8.12 1,900
8.55 1440
8.35 1300
8.00 740
7.88 725
7.92 736
7.87 708
7.38 839
7.37 870
7.4 871
7.3 880
7.99 747
7.64 753
Odor Turbidity Cyanide Dioxins Aquatic Toxicity B,J+ J ND ND 1.4 ND <1.2 -
odor units NTU mg/L pg/L
2 350 <0.0032 <1.2 pass
2 540 0.017 <0.78 pass
B,J+
2 140 <0.0028 -
4 43 <0.0028 -
1.0 120 <0.0032 <0.82 pass
2.0 56 0.021 <0.88 pass
none 3.4 <0.0028 -
1 2.4 <0.0028 -
none 810 <0.0028 <0.94 pass
none 210 <0.0028 -
none 320 <0.0028 -
none 160 <0.0028 -
1.0 210 <0.0032 <0.54 pass ND -
none 34 <0.0028 <0.80 pass ND <1.2
Asbestos (# of fibers) Oil and Grease
# of fibers mg/L
ND -
ND <1.2
Notes:
1 = Baseline criteria from SAN FRANCISCO BAY BASIN (REGION 2) WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (BASIN PLAN), Table 3.4 For Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, Ag, Zn are based on hardness values, baseline criteria listed use hardness of 100 mg/L. 2 = Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water, Region 9 SMCL - secondary maximum contaminant level bolded value and yellow shading identify California limits that differ from the national limits. TT - Treatment technique (a required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water) MRDL - maximum residual disinfectant level
Data Qualifiers (Q): J = estimated value below laboratory reporting limit - laboratory qualifier B = detected in blank sample - laboratory qualifier H = holding time exceeded - laboratory qualifier J+ = biased high due to detection in field blank or equipment blank
ND - below detectable limits
"-" - not analyzed
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 4 of 9
HG-9 27-Oct-09
HG-9 29-Dec-09
HG-10 28-Sep-09
HG-10 4-Jan-10
SW-1 4-Feb-09
SW-1 2-Apr-09
SW-1 22-Sep-09
SW-1 19-Jan-10
SW-2 4-Feb-09
SW-2 Dup 4-Feb-09
SW-2 2-Apr-09
SW-2 Dup 2-Apr-09
SW-2 22-Sep-09
Dissolved Metals <38 0.48 J ` B B J <0.013 0.022 B,J <0.13 <0.13 0.098 J 0.14 J 0.055 B,J B,J+ J J B J,J+ J <38 <0.23 <38 <0.23 <76 <0.17 <38 0.26 <38 6.3 <38 6.1 <38 3.8 <38 4.0 <38 2.4 J
Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb)
g/L g/L
<38 <0.17
<38 <0.17
<38 <0.17
Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) <0.13
g/L g/L g/L g/L <0.52 24 <0.18 15 0.79 34 <0.046 <0.67 91 <0.046 55 B,J,J+ <0.52 63 <0.18 200 0.74 58 <0.18 51 4.5 37 <0.046 4.8 35 <0.046 2.8 63 0.059 J,J+ 89 B,J,J+
1.2 19 <0.18 10
B,J
1 20 <0.18 33
<0.52 150 <0.18 33
B,J
3.4 66 <0.046 91 B,J,J+ 0.057 B,J
1.5 60 <0.18 100 <0.13
J+
Cadmium (Cd)
g/L
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) 15 1.9 J J J J, H <0.64 0.98 1.5 <0.7 J <0.55 <0.70 <0.55 1.2 B,J,J+ <0.64 0.95 <0.64 1.2
g/L g/L
1.5 <0.70
<0.55 <0.70
<0.55 <0.01
<0.64 0.83
<0.64 0.92
<0.55 <0.70
Copper (Cu) 2.3 <9.3 8.1 J <7.2 B <19 9.7 J <7.2 1.2 B,J,J+ 1.6 B,J,J+ 4.2 3.1 1.3 B,J,J+
g/L
0.86
<0.68
1.9
1.0 <7.2
J,J+
1.3 B,J,J+ 18 B,J
1.3 B,J,J+ <7.2 B
3.3 <9.3 B
Iron (Fe)
g/L
<9.3
<9.3
<9.3
Lead (Pb) <0.054 0.16 B J+ J+ 2.3 1.7 J J 0.33 J,J+ 0.58 J 0.79 J,J+ 1.9 2.2 <0.019 0.029 J <0.054 <0.054 0.023
g/L
<0.054
<0.054
0.13
<0.019 2.1
<0.019 3.0 B B
<0.019 3.0 B
<0.054 2.1 J+
Manganese (Mn)
g/L
2.5
0.19
85
Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) B,J+ 2.2 7.1 J,J+ 11 4.7 1.7 2.8 8.9 J 3.3
g/L g/L g/L 0.0631 16 <0.016 0.00078 5.7 <0.016 0.00101 3.9 0.00178 3.8 0.0547 1.8
0.00113 0.93
J+ J,J+
0.00105 2.2
<0.016 0.00141 750 70 80
<0.016 740 79
<0.016 0.00133 460 110 74
<0.016 0.00157 490 110 76
0.00182 470 44 81
J+
Nickel (Ni)
g/L
1.6
2.2
10
Selenium (Se)
g/L
<0.38
<0.38
<0.38
J B J B J+ B,J+
Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) <0.065 <0.11 1.7 J,J+ <0.028 <0.054 0.063 <0.054 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2
g/L g/L g/L
0.34 <0.11 <1.2
<0.065 <0.11 <1.2
<0.065 <0.11 <1.2
<0.065 0.17 1.8
J J B,J
<0.028 0.16 -
B,J
<0.028 0.085 J+
<0.028 <0.054 B,J+
<0.028 <0.054 B,J+
<0.065 <0.11 97 J,J+ B B
g/L
Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Metals <1.9 57 28 18 3.5 6 B,J+ 7.2 220 85 25 1.1 15 58 160 59 19 1.1 17 J B B
3.2 110 31 18 1.7 23
2.1 100 34 18 1.4 21
35 74 35 16 0.6 16
3.4 310 120 28 1.5 17
2.2 61 28 9.6 0.88 16
12 200 38 25 1.1 11
200 37 25 1.1 11
61 210 46 30 1.4 12
71 200 46 30 1.4 12
3.1 200 53 24 1.1 17
J B B B,J+ J
J J
Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) 38 <0.20 <1.1 200 <0.20 15 J <0.11 <0.051 <28 <0.23 <0.82 38 <0.060 -
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L
160 <0.20 <1.1 19 <0.20 16
160 <0.20 <1.1 23 <0.20 33
94 <0.20 <1.1 170 <0.20 26
85 J+ <0.23 <0.82 100 B <0.060 60 B,J,J+ <0.051
62 <0.40 <2.2 61 <0.40 290 <0.22
3,700 <0.20 <1.1 100 <0.20 70 <0.11
32 6.2 2.4 40 <0.060 0.14
39 6.1 1.9 40 <0.060 J 0.16
63 J+ 4.0 2.0 72 B <0.060 90 B,J,J+ J 0.086 J
110 J+ 4.0 2.1 76 B 0.10 J 85 B,J,J+ 0.099 J
<38 2.3 <1.1 60 <0.20 110 0.14
B,J+ J
g/L
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 5 of 9
Q J
Q J,J+
g/L
HG-9 27-Oct-09 <0.64
HG-9 29-Dec-09 <0.64
HG-10 28-Sep-09 3.5
HG-10 4-Jan-10 1.2
SW-1 4-Feb-09 <1.6
SW-1 2-Apr-09 <1.6
SW-1 22-Sep-09 <1.3
SW-1 19-Jan-10 40
SW-2 4-Feb-09 <1.6
SW-2 Dup 4-Feb-09 <1.6
SW-2 2-Apr-09 <1.6
SW-2 Dup 2-Apr-09 <1.6
SW-2 22-Sep-09 0.93
Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) 11 57 <16 46 J 99 6,600 87 J+ 100 J+ 75 120 1.6 J 1.6 B,J,J+ 3.2 J,J+ 15 1.4 J 1.3 J 1.7 B,J,J+ 4.2
g/L
1.2
0.92
4.8
2.5 58
J+
g/L
350
350
160
Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) 0.69 5.2 J B,J+ B 87 84 B J+ 9.2 7.6 9.2 2.3 <0.016 770 75 <0.016 750 77 B 0.92 J 3.3 J+ 3.2 130 B 4.8 4.9 5.5 J+ B,J <0.053 <0.053 <0.38 1.7 B,J+ <0.053 <0.053 <0.053
g/L
<0.19
<0.19
0.26
<0.053 7.2 <0.016 180 120 J+ B B
<0.19 4 0.02 470 44 J,J+
g/L
9.5
8.6
92
Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) 0.050 6.7 5.4 <0.54 <0.016 8.2 4.3 0.028 B,J,J+ 3.3 3.2 B <0.016 4.5 5.8 <0.016 2 27
g/L g/L g/L
0.05 1.2 2.1
<0.016 1.1 2.6
B,J+
<0.016 5.5 11
0.028 B,J,J+ 430 120 B 74
g/L
<0.54
<0.54
<0.54
75
71
Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) B J+ B,J+ J+
g/L g/L g/L <0.088 <0.11 <2.6 <0.064 <0.054 <0.064 <0.054 <0.18 <0.22 <5.2 <0.088 <0.11 23 <0.064 <0.054 -
<0.088 <0.11 <2.6
<0.088 <0.11 2.8
<0.088 <0.11 4.3
<0.064 <0.054 J+
<0.064 <0.054 B,J+
<0.064 <0.054 B,J+
<0.088 <0.11 93
g/L
Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) B B B J ND ND ND ND ND ND
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
9.9 120 33 20 1.9
5.5 100 34 19 1.5
40 87 41 18 0.62
B J
10 70 32 17 3.7
6.0 240 92 26 1.3
8.4 180 64 19 0.89
8.7 310 120 30 1.5
18 71 32 10 1.1
15 230 43 27 1.2
B B
16 230 43 43 1.2 ND ND
12 220 48 31 1.2 ND ND
15 200 44 30 1.1 ND ND
10 200 52 24 0.99 -
Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) 290 8.8 250 14 23 B 280 <5.0 230 270 <2.5 220 15 B 2 B,J,J+ 3.2 B,J,J+ <0.23 <0.12 <0.23 <0.12 290 <5.0 240 28 B <0.23 <0.23 <0.24 <0.24 170 <2.5 140 9.4
Bromoform
g/L
<0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 1.8 B,J,J+ 190 <5.0 150 B 14 B
<0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 150 14
<0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 2.1 B,J,J+ 180 <2.5 150 12 B
<0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 4.6 180 <2.5 150 12 B B,J+
240 <5.0 190 18 B
Chloroform
g/L
g/L g/L
g/L
mg/L mg/L mg/L
420 <2.5 350
440 <2.5 360
390 <2.5 320
Chloride
mg/L
26
27
14
Fluoride 29 260
mg/L
0.36
0.46
0.14
0.11
0.13 650 900 B
0.11 450 650
0.12 1,100 1,300
0.12 110 270 B
0.15 560 650 B
0.14 560 750
0.085 600 740
0.10 610 690
0.17 550 710
mg/L mg/L
31 400
26 390
30 330
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 6 of 9
HG-9 27-Oct-09
HG-9 29-Dec-09
HG-10 28-Sep-09
HG-10 4-Jan-10
SW-1 4-Feb-09
SW-1 2-Apr-09
SW-1 22-Sep-09
SW-1 19-Jan-10
SW-2 4-Feb-09
SW-2 Dup 4-Feb-09
SW-2 2-Apr-09
SW-2 Dup 2-Apr-09
SW-2 22-Sep-09
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) J H B
mg/L mg/L
450 6
J+
460 5.2
400 18
340 7
1,400 <2.5
890 0.75
1,800 5.2
350 340
1,100 <2.5
970 2.2
1,100 2.0
1,000 2.2
1,000 5.2 H
H B
J J,J+ J,J+
<0.10 H <0.025 0.91 0.0091 B,J,J+ 0.067 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 0.77 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 0.05 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050
<0.10 0.026 0.029 0.021 0.036 <0.050
H J J J J
<0.10 <0.025 4.9 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050
<0.10 <0.050 3.3 <0.0081 0.031 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 5.6 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050
<0.10 H 0.038 B,J,J+ 0.81 <0.0081 0.26 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 0.65 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 0.67 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 2.3 <0.0081 0.025 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 2.3 <0.0081 0.012 <0.050
J,J+
<0.10 <0.025 0.48 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050
s.u. umhos/cm
7.55 752
7.44 775
7.52 662
8.5 533
7.97 1,500
8.13 1,110
7.86 2040
7.07 515
8.30 1,240
8.29 1,210
8.15 1,210
8.28 1,210
8.24 1,270
J+
Odor Turbidity Cyanide Dioxins Aquatic Toxicity B ND <1.2 1 -
none 3.6 <0.0028 -
none 1.4 <0.0028 -
none 4.6 <0.0028 -
none 2.7 <0.0028 -
none 0.38 <0.0032 <0.64 pass
none 0.24 0.0034 B,J,J+ <0.29 pass
none 2.1 <0.0028 -
4 120 <0.0028 -
none 2.9 <0.0032 <0.64 pass
4 2.4 <0.0032 -
none 0.44 0.0036 B,J,J+ <1.0 pass <1.2
none 0.48 <0.0028 <0.72 pass
2 1.5 <0.0028 -
# of fibers mg/L
1.6 B,J,J+
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 7 of 9
SW-2 Dup 22-Sep-09 1,000 200 SMCL
SW-2 20-Jan-10
SW-2 Dup 20-Jan-10
SW-3 4-Feb-09
SW-3 1-Apr-09
SW-3 22-Sep-09
SW-3 14-Jan-10
North Quarry 13-Jan-10 Q Q Basin Plan 1 Criteria USEPA 2 DW MCL
West Material Storage Area Runoff 13-Jan-10
Dissolved Metals
Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb)
g/L g/L <38 <0.23 <38 <0.23 <38 <0.17 <38 <0.17 <38 8.2 <38 0.86
<38 3.0
<38 0.98
<38 0.99
J
6 150 (4-day) 340 (1 hr) 50 1,000 4
J,J+ B J,J+ <0.13 <0.13 0.53 J,J+
Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B)
g/L g/L g/L g/L <0.67 96 <0.046 <0.67 100 <0.046 39 <0.52 170 <0.18 67 <0.52 110 <0.18 40 J 4.5 41 <0.18 69
2.2 68 <0.18 100
J,J+
J+
J,J+
J+ 0.017 J <0.013
1.5 43 <0.18 36
1.5 42 <0.18 35
J J
<0.13 5 50 1.1 (H) (4-day) 3.9 (H) (1 hr) 11 (4-day) 16 (1 hr) Cr (VI)
1.3 24 <0.18 31
Cadmium (Cd)
g/L
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) J
g/L g/L <0.64 1.4 0.81 <0.7 J <0.55 <0.70 <0.55 2.0
0.58 <0.70
<0.55 1.2 B,J,J+
<0.55 1.2 B,J,J+
0.63 J 1.3 J,J+
J+ J
1.2 <9.3
<0.55 -
Copper (Cu) <7.2 <7.2 B <9.3 B <9.3 B <9.3
g/L 0.7 B,J,J+ 0.6 J,J+ 2.2 1.5
4.8
1.8
1.4 J
9 (H) (4-day) 13 (H) (1 hr)
Iron (Fe)
g/L
<9.3
<9.3
<9.3
Lead (Pb) 0.11 J,J+ 0.31 J 0.73 J,J+ 1.4 21 14
g/L <0.019 0.026 J <0.054 <0.054 <0.054 <0.054
<0.054
<0.054
0.22
2.5 (H) (4-day) 65 (H) (1 hr)
Manganese (Mn)
g/L
2.8
J+
3.9
4.2
TT 1,000 SMCL 300 SMCL TT Action Level = 15 50 SMCL 0.025 (4-day) 2.4 (1 hr) 0.025 (4-day) 120 3.4 29
Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) B,J+ J 0.7 J <0.38 0.45 J 82 1.0 J 1.3 J,J+ 0.87 J 160 J+ 1.4 <0.23
g/L g/L g/L <0.016 0.00072 24 <0.016 <0.00020 0.91 B,J,J+ 0.00069 10 0.00089 J+ 3.6 0.0107 540
0.00173 470
J+
0.070 83
0.0662 84
2 2
Nickel (Ni)
g/L
47
27
27
100 50 100 SMCL 3.4 (H) (1-hr)
Selenium (Se)
g/L
90
13
13
52 (H) (4-day) 470 (H) (1 hr) 5 (4-day) 20 (1-hour)
Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) <0.028 <0.054 B J J,J+ B J+ <0.028 0.1 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 <0.065 <0.11 1.9 J
g/L g/L g/L
<0.065 <0.11 110
<0.065 <0.11 66
<0.065 <0.11 66
<0.065 0.39 400
<0.065 <0.11 2.6
J
120 (H) (4-day) 120 (H) (1 hr) 5,000 SMCL
g/L
J,J+ B
B,J
B,J
Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Metals B J J,J+ J
4 210 55 24 0.89 17
4.1 84 28 13 2.2 13
4.4 79 26 12 2.1 12
4.7 55 37 18 0.55 18
67 58 34 14 0.63 22
<1.9 64 37 16 0.51 23
<1.9 61 B 36 16 0.63 J 19
120 210 36 22 0.85 12
28 160 42 24 2 7.4
1,000 200 SMCL
J B
B,J
Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) <28 <0.23 <0.82 110 <0.060 J,J+ <0.051 <0.051 <28 0.29 <0.82 110 <0.060 48
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L
<76 2.2 1.4 61 <0.20 350
6 50 1,000 4 B,J+ <0.11
B,J+
4,900 1.4 2.2 180 <0.20 52
5,200 1.1 2.3 170 <0.20 54
<76 <0.20 <1.1 160 <0.20 360
72 0.42 J <1.1 110 <0.20 39 J 0.7 B,J
720 7.9 3.7 59 <0.20 70 1.3
J B
87,000 1.6 21 4,200 1.1 52 5.8
J B
1.1 (H) (4-day) 3.9 (H) (1 hr) 5
g/L
0.11
0.49
0.44
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 8 of 9
Q J,J+
Basin Plan 1 Criteria
g/L
SW-2 Dup 22-Sep-09 <0.64
SW-2 20-Jan-10 25
SW-2 Dup 20-Jan-10 25
SW-3 4-Feb-09 <1.6
SW-3 1-Apr-09 <1.6
SW-3 22-Sep-09 1.1
SW-3 Q 14-Jan-10 1.3 J
North Quarry 13-Jan-10 6
West Material Storage Area Runoff 13-Jan-10 370
Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) 0.67 <16 30 J <60 150 1,200 160,000 J 0.78 J 1.3 J,J+ 3.3 170
g/L
2.2
J+
14
13
1.2 J
g/L
<60
8,300
9,000
Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) 0.37 J,J+ J,J+ <0.54 73 33 5 (4-day) 20 (1-hour) 0.025 (4-day) 2.4 (1 hr) 2 100 50 100 SMCL 2 J 0.75 J,J+ 1.1 4.5 B,J+ 38 3,000
g/L <0.053 0.064 J,J+ <0.19 17
<0.19
2.5
B,J+
2.3
B,J+
0.2 B,J,J+
0.5 B,J,J+
B B
g/L
3.7
170
150
USEPA 2 DW MCL 50 TT 1,000 SMCL 300 SMCL TT Action Level = 15 50 SMCL
Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) B J 0.52 J <0.54 <0.50
g/L g/L g/L <0.016 16 1.3 <0.016 1.3 1.0 B B,J+ J,J+ 0.018 1.1 1.5 <0.016 1.1 1.4 J,J+ <0.016 630 180 1.5 140 460
0.058 450 43
J,J+
0.032 92 77
J,J+
<0.016 94 73
g/L
69
13
13
Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) J
g/L g/L g/L <0.064 <0.054 <0.064 0.14 <0.088 <0.11 <2.6 <0.088 0.13 J <2.6 <0.088 0.24 430
<0.088 <0.11 86
<0.088 0.28 100
<0.088 0.14 96
0.89 0.79 350
J J
Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) B B J J J ND ND ND ND -
g/L J+ J+
5,000 SMCL
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
12 200 53 25 0.89
89 100 31 13 2.7
85 100 33 13 2.8
7.8 61 41 19 0.6
6.0 66 39 16 0.72
5.9 31 18 17 0.53
5.9 B 69 42 17 0.75 J 140 230 40 23 1.0 600 1000 160 25 8.2
Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) <0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 2.3 B,J,J+ 320 <2.5 260 28 B 16 320 13 270 310 7.1 260 23 B <1.1 <0.23 <0.12 330 <2.5 270 20 <0.23 <0.24 200 <5.0 170 13
Bromoform
g/L
71 <5.0 58 25
Chloroform
g/L
g/L g/L
80 80 TTHM 80 TTHM 80 TTHM 1,000
g/L
mg/L mg/L mg/L
230 <5.0 190
170 <2.5 140
170 <2.5 140
Chloride
mg/L
18
10
10
250 - 600 SMCL 1.4 - 2.4 0.12 0.099 0.14 0.22

(temp. dependent) SMCL
Fluoride 28 290 B
mg/L
0.17
0.13
0.13
0.18
0.14 18 290 J+
mg/L mg/L
560 750
160 320
160 300
22 310
23 300
550 673
550 580
250 - 600 SMCL
May 2010 Water QualityMonitoring Results
TABLE D-1
063-7109 Page 9 of 9
SW-2 Dup 22-Sep-09 340 <2.5 J H J J 6.5 to 8.5 within 0.5 of ambient 6.5 - 8.5 SMCL 3 SMCL TT 0.2 10 1 4.0 MRDL 360 0.86 350 <2.0 360 <3.3 790 18 900 3,600
SW-2 20-Jan-10
SW-2 Dup 20-Jan-10
SW-3 4-Feb-09
SW-3 1-Apr-09
SW-3 22-Sep-09
SW-3 14-Jan-10
North Quarry 13-Jan-10 Q Q Basin Plan 1 Criteria USEPA 2 DW MCL 500 SMCL
West Material Storage Area Runoff 13-Jan-10
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
mg/L mg/L
1,000 4
410 200
400 190
H B
H B,J+
H B,J+
H J+
<0.10 <0.025 0.51 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050
<0.10 0.15 1.4 <0.0081 0.29 <0.050
<0.10 0.07 1.4 <0.0081 0.59 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 <0.018 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 <0.026 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050
<0.10 <0.025 0.055 <0.0081 0.016 <0.050
<0.10 H 0.027 J,J+ <0.026 <0.0081 <0.016 B <0.050 <0.10 <0.025 0.73 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050 <0.10 0.095 7.6 <0.0081 1.8 -
s.u. umhos/cm
8.16 1250
7.49 602
7.55 605
8.18 577
8.39 541
8.39 589
8.27 H 596 7.94 1,130 7.90 1,090
Odor Turbidity Cyanide Dioxins Aquatic Toxicity J+ ND J,J+ 2.8 -
2 1.9 <0.0028 -
8 90 <0.0028 -
4 100 <0.0028 -
2 0.22 <0.0032 <0.64 pass
none 0.36 <0.0032 <0.31 pass
1 2.1 <0.0028 -
none 0.78 J+ -
<0.0028 -
# of fibers mg/L
7E+6 10 m fibers
May 2010
TABLE D-2 PER070 Water Quality Data Dry Jun-02 1.02 8.92 8.18 16.69 2.21 1.02 202 0.17 55.8 424 3.5 336 720 0.07 0.007 0.37 0.025 0.04 0.074 0.071 1.85 1.74 0.019 0.008 2.17 1.6 ND ND 1.88 1.25 0.92 0.86 0.87 0.46 0.0024 5.84 5.84 1.4 2 Spring Apr-02 1.01 11.21 8.33 13.52 1.4 1.94 189 0.06 49.7 498 1.5 326 724 0.07 1.54 0.007 0.37 0.012 0.04 0.38 0.37 1.69 1.55 ND 0.02 8.71 7.86 ND ND 1.42 1.11 1 1.04 2.72 2.31 0.00137 10.3 5.09 5.1 12.9 Wet Jan-03 1.14 10.78 7.50 14.01 4.90 185 0.18 42.3 533 9.74 379 850 ND 2.11 0.0207 0 0.014 0.056 0.95 1 2.26 1.68 0.108 0.00478 33.7 30.9 ND ND 5.27 2.64 1.95 1.94 8.12 6.8 0.0156 18.7 18.8 0.7 0.9
063-7109
Parameter Specific Conductance Dissolved Oxygen pH Temperature Turbidity Velocity Alkalinity Boron Chloride Hardness SSC Sulfate TDS Total Ammonia Nitrate Nitrite Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Orthophospate Total Phosphorus Cadmium (T) Cadmium (D) Copper (T) Copper (D) Lead (T) Lead (D) Nickel (T) Nickel (D) Silver (T) Silver (D) Zinc (T) Zinc (D) Arsenic (T) Arsenic (D) Chromium (T) Chromium (D) Mercury (T) Selenium (T) Selenium (D) Organic Carbon (D) Organic Carbon (T) (TOC)
Unit mS/cm mg/L s.u. C NTU ft/s mg/L as CaCO3 mg/L mg/L mg/L as CaCO3 mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L as N mg/L as N mg/L as N mg/L mg/L as P mg/L as P g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L
Notes: Yellow shading identifies peak concentration. SSC - suspended sediment concentration ND - concentration is below detectable limits Source: SFBRWQCB, 2007
APPENDIX E QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL
Date: March 1, 2010 Project No.: 063-7109 RE: BASELINE WATER QUALITY AND GEOCHEMICAL DATA QA/QC REPORT
1.0
INTRODUCTION
This Technical Memorandum presents the results of the quality
A primary objective of the baseline water quality data collection effort is to provide analytical data that are of known and defensible quality. assurance/quality control (QA/QC) evaluation of the baseline data set.
2.0
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM
The QA/QC program for baseline sample collection included the following: (1) collection and analysis of field duplicate water samples; (2) collection and analysis of equipment blank and field blank samples; and (3) calculation of charge balance errors.
2.1
Field Duplicate Sample Results
Field duplicate sample results were evaluated following guidelines presented in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Contract Laboratory Program Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review (USEPA, 2004). Although the USEPA provides no required review criteria for determining the comparability of field duplicate analyses, or laboratory duplicate analyses of water samples, a control limit of 20% for the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) is typically applied to original and duplicate sample values that are greater than or equal to five times the Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL). A control limit of 35% is applied for solid phase analysis results. For the current study, the CRQL was assumed equal to the practical quantitation limit (PQL). If the concentration in either the original or duplicate sample is less than five times the CRQL (PQL), a control limit of one times the CRQL is applied. These criteria were applied to assess duplicate results. The RPD of all duplicate samples greater than five times the CRQL was calculated as follows (Equation 1):
(%) =

+ 2
100
(Equation 1)
2.2
Field Blank Sample Results

Equipment blanks are used to verify the adequacy of sampling equipment
One field blank or equipment sample was collected and analyzed during each groundwater and surface water sampling event.
appendix e - data quality assurance quality control.docx
Golder Associates Inc. 18300 NE Union Hill Road, Suite 200 Redmond, WA 98052 USA Tel: (425) 883-0777 Fax: (425) 882-5498 www.golder.com Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America
March 2010 063-7109
decontamination procedures. All samples reporting values less than ten times the reporting limit for any constituent detected in a blank sample were qualified as estimated high (J+ qualifier) (USEPA, 2004).
2.3
Charge Balance Errors
Calculation of a charge balance error is a standard practice in assessing the accuracy of a water analysis. Solution electroneutrality means that the sum of cations in solution (expressed in meq/L) should be equal to the sum of anions. A charge balance error of less than 5% to 10% is generally regarded as indicative of a good analysis. Charge balance errors for water samples were calculated as follows:
% =
100
(Equation 2)
Charge balance errors were calculated for speciated solutions using PHREEQC (Version 2.12), an equilibrium speciation and mass-transfer code developed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) (Parkhurst and Appelo, 1999). Concentrations of constituents reported below detectable limits were assumed equal to the detection limit.
3.0 3.1
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
One field duplicate sample was collected during each sampling round. Duplicate analysis results are presented in Attachment A. Results are summarized in Table E-1. The results of field duplicate analysis were satisfactory. For each duplicate sample, greater than 94% percent of determinations met the project defined acceptable criteria. One field blank (FB) or equipment blank (EB) sample was collected during each surface water and groundwater sampling event, respectively. Complete blank sample results are provided in Attachment B. Summaries of only the blank sample detections that resulted in qualification of one or more sample results as biased high (J+ qualifier) are presented in Table E-2 (equipment blanks) and Table E-3 (field blanks). Constituents detected in the blank samples were typically present at concentrations below the PQL. Equipment and field blank samples collected in April 2009 yielded the highest number of detections. A number of constituents were detected in the laboratory blank sample (identified with a B qualifier), indicating that laboratory contamination may have been the source. Constituents detected in 4 or more blank samples are listed below:
Molybdenum Dissolved molybdenum was often detected in both field and equipment blanks. This result suggests that the filters may introduce low levels of molybdenum into the samples. The maximum concentration measured in a blank sample (11 g/L) is much lower than the range of concentrations measured at SW-2 (83 to 750 g/L).
March 2010 063-7109
Zinc Dissolved zinc was often detected in both field and equipment blanks. Nickel Total recoverable nickel was detected in five out of eight blank samples. Concentrations were consistently low (<1 g/L). Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate - Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected in all blank samples in which it was analyzed. This constituent was often detected in the laboratory blank, indicating that the laboratory is a possible source of contamination.
Charge balance error results are shown in Table E-4. All charge balance errors were acceptable. Thirtytwo (32) of the 34 water samples reported charge balance errors less than 5%. All samples reported charge balance errors less than 10%.
3.2
Mine Water Samples
Duplicate and blank samples were not collected during the mine water (i.e., North Quarry and storage area runoff) sampling event. Charge balance error results are shown in Table E-4. Charge balance errors were acceptable (<10%).
3.3
Laboratory Geochemical Testing
Charge balance error results for WET test leachates are shown in Table E-5. Charge balance errors were positive for all samples, indicative of a cation surplus or anion deficit. Charge balance errors ranged from 3% to 17%. The WET leach test is mainly intended to provide information on trace metal leaching. Because the charge balance errors are most likely attributable to inaccurate analysis of major ions, the errors are considered acceptable for the current evaluation.
3.4
Field Geochemical Testing Wall Washing
Wall washing field blank results are presented in Table E-6. Most constituents were below detectable limits in the single blank sample collected. Low level detections of the following constituents resulted in qualification of some sample results as biased high (i.e., assigned a J+ qualifier): dissolved zinc and dissolved potassium. Charge balance error results are shown in Table E-7. Charge balance errors were acceptable for the wall washing rinsates from the three limestone samples (less than 5%). The chert, greywacke and greenstone rinsate samples reported charge balance errors ranging from 15 to 20%. omission of an analyte. All errors were positive, indicative of a cation excess or anion deficit. It is possible that the poor charge balance results from Charge balance errors were calculated using only dissolved phase concentrations. Total phosphorus concentrations for these three samples ranged from 2 to 100 mg/L. Exclusion of dissolved phosphate in the calculation of charge balance errors may in part explain the anion deficit. dissolved nickel,
March 2010 063-7109
4.0
SUMMARY
A primary objective of the baseline water quality data collection is to provide analytical data that are of known and defensible quality. This Technical Memorandum presents the results of the QA/QC evaluation of the baseline water quality data set. Based on this evaluation, the data are of acceptable quality for their intended purpose.
4.1
References
Parkhurst, D.L., and C.A.J. Appelo, 1999. Users Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) - A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4259, Denver, CO. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2004. US EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review Final. EPA 540-R-04-004, October 2004.
List of Tables
Table E-1 Table E-2 Table E-3 Table E-4 Table E-5 Table E-6 Table E-7 Field Duplicate Result Summary Water Quality Monitoring Summary of Equipment Blank Sample Results Water Quality Monitoring Summary of Field Blank Sample Results Water Quality Monitoring Charge Balance Errors Water Quality Monitoring Charge Balance Errors WET Test Field Blank Sample Result Wall Washing Charge Balance Errors Wall Washing
List of Attachments
Attachment A Attachment B Field Duplicate Results Field and Equipment Blank Results
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-1 Field Duplicate Result Summary Water Quality Monitoring

No. of Determinations
66 77 69 70 69
Location
SW-2 SW-2 SW-2 HG-7 SW-2
Date
4-Feb-09 2-Apr-09 22-Sep-09 27-Oct-09 20-Jan-10
No. of Failures
2 3 2 4 2
% Failure
3% 4% 3% 6% 3%
Appendix E Tables.xlsx
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-2 Summary of Equipment Blank Sample Results Water Quality Monitoring
February
Q J J 14 0.24 8.9 0.019 0.24 0.058 3 0.13 0.099 J 0.06 1 J 0.071 1 B,J 0.28 5 J J 0.031 0.054 1 1 0.00052 0.21 J 0.0002 5E-04 0.13 1 0.21 J B,J J J J 4.9 0.045 7.2 0.019 100 2 50 1 0.13 0.67 0.046 2 1 MDL PQL
April
EB-1 15-Apr-09 Q MDL PQL EB-1 29-Oct-09 Q MDL PQL EB-1 29-Dec-09 Q MDL
October
December
PQL
Parameter
Unit
EB-1 9-Feb-09 1 0.058
Total EB
J B B B,J J B,J J 0.025 0.05 0.0089
0.56
B,J
0.25
5 6.5 0.025 0.025 0.0041 B,J J 0.012 0.05 0.003 0.01
0.23 1.5
0.5 5.5
4.4 1.4 5.4 1.6 0.99 3.5 2.9 2.2 12
1.6 0.045 0.092 0.031 0.065 1.3 0.23 1.1
3 2 1 1 2 5 0.5 4.8 20 B,J 0.0081 20 0.05
Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Thallium (Tl) Zinc (Zn) Potassium (K) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Chloroform bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Ammonia (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Cyanide
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L mg/L
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
Notes: MDL - method detection limit PQL - practical quantitation limit Laboratory Qualifiers (Q): J = estimated value below laboratory reporting limit B = detected in blank sample. H = holding time exceeded
detected in blank sample - one or more results bold qualified as estimated biased high (J+)
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-3 Summary of Field Blank Sample Results Water Quality Monitoring
February Unit
J FB-1 4-Feb-09 0.52 Q MDL PQL FB 3-Apr-09 Q MDL PQL FB-1 22-Sep-09 Q MDL PQL Q MDL FB 20-Jan-10 0.64 1 0.81 0.25 0.064 0.22 2 0.00023 J 1.9 5 0.13 0.15 1 2 J 0.0002 4.5 B 0.32 0.031 1 J 0.031 1 2.4 0.00080 11 0.22 18 B,J J 0.045 0.025 2 1 0.3 B,J 0.045 2 B,J 0.7
April
September
January
PQL 2 2
Parameter
Total FB
0.092 J 0.046 14 B,J 4.9 23 B 0.18
1 100
0.0005
4.8
0.28
0.044 J 0.028 68 B 0.28 0.14 B,J 0.071 36 J 28
1 5 1 50
0.33 B,J 0.045 17 J 16 50
190 B,J 1 J 0.81 J
24 0.64 0.66
200 3 2
0.03 0.43
J J
0.016 0.25
0.2 2
0.78 0.47 0.028 0.35
B,J B,J J B,J
0.19 0.11 0.016 0.25
1 1 0.2 2
1.2 1.7 3.7 J B,J 1.3 1.9 5 7
0.031
0.064 J 0.053 5.3 0.092 0.018 B,J 0.016 0.16 J 0.031 0.24 B,J 0.065 40 B 1.3 2.4 B,J 1.1 3.5 0.21 0.13 0.012 0.05
1 1 0.2 1 2 5 4 1
0.065 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.003 B,J 0.003 0.005 3.8 B,J 1.2 6.2 0.18
0.025 0.1
0.05 0.1
Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Silver (Ag) Zinc (Zn) Potassium (K) Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Sulfate Ammonia (as N) Total Phosphorus Turbidity Cyanide Oil and Grease
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L-N mg/L NTU mg/L mg/L
1 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1
Notes: MDL - method detection limit PQL - practical quantitation limit Laboratory Qualifiers (Q): J = estimated value below laboratory reporting limit B = detected in blank sample. H = holding time exceeded
detected in blank sample - one or more results qualified as estimated biased high bold (J+)
V:\PROJECTS\_2006 PROJECTS\063-7109_Permanente_Quarry\Geochemistry\Baseline Report (Nov 2009)\Report\2_Draft Appendices to GAI-CA (Mar 2 2010)\Appendix E\Appendix E Tables.xlsx
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-4 Charge Balance Errors Water Quality Monitoring

Groundwater Mine Water
Surface Water
Location
-0.1 -3.9 -4.3 0.1 0.8 -3.2 -1.6 -4.5 -5.7 -1.6 0.2 5.1 2.2 3.7 5.0 1.1 HG-4 HG-6 HG-9 HG-4 HG-6 HG-7 HG-9 HG-10 HG-4 HG-7 HG-7 DUP HG-9 HG-6 HG-7 HG-9 HG-4 HG-6 HG-10 9-Feb-09 9-Feb-09 9-Feb-09 14-Apr-09 14-Apr-09 15-Apr-09 15-Apr-09 28-Sep-09 26-Oct-09 27-Oct-09 27-Oct-09 27-Oct-09 29-Oct-09 29-Dec-09 29-Dec-09 4-Jan-10 4-Jan-10 4-Jan-10 -0.8 -0.4 0.1 -0.9 1.5 0.6 -0.2 -0.9 -2.2 0.2 2.2 2.6 3.5 2.3 0.2 -1.1 -0.6 0.2 Storage Area Runoff North Quarry
Date
Charge Balance Error (%) Location Date Location Date

13-Jan-10 13-Jan-10
Charge Balance Error (%)

-6.7 -3.7
SW-1 SW-2 SW-2 Dup SW-3 SW-3 SW-1 SW-2 SW-2 Dup SW-1 SW-2 SW-2 Dup SW-3 SW-3 SW-1 SW-2 SW-2 Dup
4-Feb-09 4-Feb-09 4-Feb-09 4-Feb-09 1-Apr-09 2-Apr-09 2-Apr-09 2-Apr-09 22-Sep-09 22-Sep-09 22-Sep-09 22-Sep-09 14-Jan-10 19-Jan-10 20-Jan-10 20-Jan-10
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-5 Charge Balance Errors WET Test

17 11 11 5.4 5.2 10 2.6
Sample
Composite 1 Composite 2 GT1-2-08-213 Composite 3 Composite 4 Composite 5 CS-01 Graywacke Limestone and Dolomitic Limestone Chert Fault Breccia Greenstone Metabasalt Overburden
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-6 Field Blank Sample Result Wall Washing

FB-01 24-Nov-09
<38 <0.17 <0.52 <0.70 1.2 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 <0.55 <0.68 <9.3 <0.054 <0.11 <0.13 0.18 <0.38 <65 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 2 0.14 <0.029 <0.12 0.099 <38 <0.20 <1.1 0.69 <0.20 <12 <0.11 <0.64 <0.66 <30 <0.19 0.63 <0.016 <0.23 0.84 <0.54 <0.088 <0.11 <2.6 4.6
Parameter
Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Hexavalent Chromium Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Chromium Copper Iron Lead Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silicon as SiO2 Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Total Recoverable Aluminum Total Recoverable Antimony Total Recoverable Arsenic Total Recoverable Barium Total Recoverable Beryllium Total Recoverable Boron Total Recoverable Cadmium Total Recoverable Chromium Total Recoverable Copper Total Recoverable Iron Total Recoverable Lead Total Recoverable Manganese Total Recoverable Mercury Total Recoverable Molybdenum Total Recoverable Nickel Total Recoverable Selenium Total Recoverable Silver Total Recoverable Thallium Total Recoverable Vanadium Total Recoverable Zinc
Unit
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L
B,J
B,J J
March 2010
063-7109
TABLE E-7 Charge Balance Errors Wall Washing

-0.1 15 -1 20 4 15
Sample
HG-01 GW-01 MG-01 CT-01 HMG-01 GS-01 Limestone - high grade Greywacke Limestone - med to high Chert Limestone - high and med/low Greenstone
March 2010
063-7109
Parameter
Total Recoverable Calcium Total Recoverable Magnesium Total Recoverable Sodium Total Recoverable Potassium Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Nitrate as N Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) pH Electrical Conductivity @ 25 C Total Dissolved Solids @ 180 C Total Suspended Solids (Glass Fiber) Turbidity Residual Chlorine Ammonia as N Nitrite as N Total Phosphorus Notes: Q - Laboratory qualifiers B - constituent detected in method blank J - estimated value H - holding time exceeded
Unit
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L pH Units umhos/cm mg/L mg/L NT Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
FB-01 24-Nov-09
0.18 <0.038 <0.070 <0.092 <5.0 <2.5 <4.1 <0.059 <0.010 <0.026 <0.21 0.43 5.81 2.2 <6.7 <4.0 0.31 <0.10 <0.025 <0.0081 <0.016
J H
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT A Duplicate Analysis Results

Parameter Metals Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) Units MDL PQL February 2009 SW-2 SW-2 Dup 4-Feb-09 4-Feb-09 50 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.2 0.0005 1 2 2 1 1 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 50 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1 1 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 <38 6.3 4.5 37 <0.046 0.098 <0.64 0.95 1.3 <7.2 0.023 2.2 <0.016 0.00141 750 70 80 <0.028 0.16 12 200 38 25 1.1 11 32 6.2 2.4 40 <0.060 0.14 <1.6 1.4 87 <0.053 4.8 <0.016 770 75 87 <0.064 <0.054 15 230 43 27 1.2 <38 6.1 4.8 35 <0.046 0.14 <0.64 1.2 1.0 <7.2 <0.019 2.1 <0.016 740 79 <0.028 0.085 200 37 25 1.1 11 39 6.1 1.9 40 <0.060 0.16 <1.6 1.3 100 <0.053 4.9 <0.016 750 77 84 <0.064 <0.054 16 230 43 43 1.2
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 6% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 1% 1% +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% 3% 0% +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 3% 3% 4% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% 0% 46% +/- PQL
Page 1 of 10
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
38 0.23 0.67 0.068 0.046 0.013 0.64 0.7 0.045 7.2 0.019 0.025 0.016 0.0002 0.031 0.04 0.23 0.028 0.054 0.28 0.019 0.021 0.049 0.071 0.038 28 0.23 0.82 0.072 0.06 0.051 1.6 0.045 16 0.053 0.092 0.016 0.031 0.065 0.5 0.064 0.054 1.3 0.021 0.019 0.053 0.12
Water Quality Eval (Mar 2010).xlsx

Parameter Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Bromoform Chloroform Dibromochloromethane Toluene SVOCs bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) Odor Turbidity g/L g/L g/L g/L 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 <0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL
Page 2 of 10
Units
MDL
PQL
February 2009 SW-2 SW-2 Dup 4-Feb-09 4-Feb-09 ND ND ND ND
g/L
1.1
1.8
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L mg/L s.u. umhos/cm odor units NTU
10 5 8.2 0.075 0.0083 0.26 0.1 50 2.5 0.1 0.025 0.018 0.0081 0.012 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1
10 5 8.2 0.5 0.05 2 0.5 50 2.5 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1
190 <5.0 150 14 0.15 560 650 1100 <2.5 <0.10 <0.025 0.65 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050 8.30 1240 none 2.9
150 14 0.14 560 750 970 2.2 <0.10 <0.025 0.67 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.050 8.29 1210 4.0 2.4
0% 0% +/- PQL 0% 14% 13% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 3% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% 2%
> +/- PQL

19%
Cyanide Dioxins Aquatic Toxicity Asbestos (# of fibers) Oil and Grease
mg/L pg/L # of fibers mg/L
0.0032
0.005
<0.0032 <0.64 pass 1 NA
<0.0032 -
+/- PQL -
Determinations Failures % Failure
66 2 3%

Parameter Metals Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) Units MDL PQL April 2009 SW-2 SW-2 Dup 2-Apr-09 2-Apr-09 <38 3.8 2.8 63 0.059 89 0.055 <0.64 0.83 1.3 18 <0.019 3.0 <0.016 0.00133 460 110 74 <0.028 <0.054 61 210 46 30 1.4 12 63 4.0 2.0 72 <0.060 90 0.086 <1.6 1.7 75 <0.053 5.5 0.028 430 120 74 <0.064 <0.054 12 220 48 31 1.2 <38 4.0 3.4 66 <0.046 91 0.057 <0.64 0.92 1.3 <7.2 <0.019 3.0 <0.016 0.00157 490 110 76 <0.028 <0.054 71 200 46 30 1.4 12 110 4.0 2.1 76 0.10 85 0.099 <1.6 4.2 120 <0.053 7.2 <0.016 180 120 75 <0.064 <0.054 15 200 44 30 1.1
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 5% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 6% 0% 3% +/- PQL +/- PQL 15% 5% 0% 0% +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 5% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL > +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 27% +/- PQL 82% 0% 1% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 10% 9% 3% +/- PQL
Page 3 of 10
38 0.23 0.67 0.068 0.046 4.9 0.013 0.64 0.7 0.045 7.2 0.019 0.025 0.016 0.0002 0.031 0.04 0.23 0.028 0.054 0.28 0.019 0.021 0.049 0.071 0.038 28 0.23 0.82 0.072 0.06 6.4 0.051 1.6 0.045 16 0.053 0.092 0.016 0.031 0.065 0.5 0.064 0.054 1.3 0.021 0.019 0.053 0.12
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.2 0.0005 1 2 2 1 1 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1 1 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1

Parameter Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Bromoform Chloroform Dibromochloromethane Toluene SVOCs bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) Odor Turbidity g/L g/L g/L g/L 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12 <0.24 <0.23 <0.23 <0.12
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL
Page 4 of 10
Units
MDL
PQL
April 2009 SW-2 SW-2 Dup 2-Apr-09 2-Apr-09 ND ND ND ND
g/L
1.1
2.1
4.6
+/- PQL
5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 10 0.5 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.012 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1
10 5 8.2 0.5 0.05 2 0.5 50 1.2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1
180 <2.5 150 12 0.085 600 740 1100 2.0 <0.10 <0.025 2.3 <0.0081 0.025 <0.050 8.15 1210 none 0.44
180 <2.5 150 12 0.10 610 690 1000 2.2 <0.10 <0.025 2.3 <0.0081 0.012 <0.050 8.28 1210 none 0.48
0% +/- PQL 0% 0% +/- PQL 2% 7% 10% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 2% 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL
0.0032 / 0.0028
0.005
0.0036 <1.0 pass <1.2
<0.0032 <0.72 pass 1.6
+/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL
1.2
77 3 4%

Parameter Metals Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) Units MDL PQL September 2009 SW-2 22-Sep-09 <38 2.4 1.5 60 <0.18 100 <0.13 <0.55 <0.70 3.3 <9.3 <0.054 2.1 470 44 81 <0.065 <0.11 97 3.1 200 53 24 1.1 17 <38 2.3 <1.1 60 <0.20 110 0.14 0.93 2.5 58 <0.19 4 0.02 470 44 71 <0.088 <0.11 93 10 200 52 24 0.99 SW-2 Dup 22-Sep-09 <38 3 2.2 68 <0.18 100 <0.13 0.58 <0.70 4.8 <9.3 <0.054 2.8 470 47 90 <0.065 <0.11 110 4 210 55 24 0.89 17 <76 2.2 1.4 61 <0.20 350 0.11 <0.64 2.2 <60 <0.19 3.7 0.058 450 43 69 <0.088 <0.11 86 12 200 53 25 0.89
Page 5 of 10
38 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.7 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.22 0.13 / 0.26 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 0.065 38 / 76 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 12 / 24 0.11 0.64 0.66 30 / 60 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088 0.11 2.6 3.2 0.036 / 0.072 0.038 / 0.076 0.07 / 0.14 0.092 / 0.18
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 2 1/2 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 50 / 100 2 2 1 1 100 / 200 1 3 2 50 / 100 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 / 0.2 0.05 / 0.1 0.5 / 1 1/2
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 13% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL
0% 7% 11% +/- PQL +/- PQL 13% +/- PQL 5% 4% 0% +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 2% +/- PQL > +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 4% 2% 3% +/- PQL +/- PQL 8% +/- PQL 0% 2% 4% +/- PQL

Parameter Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Bromoform Chloroform Dibromochloromethane Toluene SVOCs bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) Odor Turbidity g/L g/L g/L g/L Units MDL PQL September 2009 SW-2 22-Sep-09 SW-2 Dup 22-Sep-09 -
Page 6 of 10
g/L
10 5 8.2 0.059 0.01 0.42 0.1 50 2 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.016 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1
10 5 8.2 0.5 0.05 2 0.5 50 2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1
240 <5.0 190 18 0.17 550 710 1000 5.2 <0.10 <0.025 0.48 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050 8.24 1270 2 1.5
230 <5.0 190 18 0.17 560 750 1000 4 <0.10 <0.025 0.51 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050 8.16 1250 2 1.9
4% +/- PQL 0% 0% +/- PQL 2% 5% 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 1% 2% +/- PQL 24%
0.0028
0.005
<0.0028 -
<0.0028 -
+/- PQL
69 2 3%

Parameter Metals Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) Units MDL PQL October 2009 HG-7 27-Oct-09 <38 <0.17 2.2 120 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 2.1 <0.70 <0.68 310 <0.054 330 0.0235 0.62 1.7 <0.38 0.81 <0.11 <1.2 <1.9 110 43 21 0.93 26 36000 0.47 9.7 330 0.81 12 0.28 320 35 53000 8.3 1100 0.058 1.9 310 <0.54 0.14 0.12 91 79 130 93 24 5.2 HG-7 DUP 27-Oct-09 <38 <0.17 2.4 120 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 1.4 <0.70 <0.68 310 <0.054 320 0.0221 0.54 1.7 <0.38 0.42 <0.11 <1.2 3 110 45 21 0.91 26 47000 0.44 11 350 0.94 17 0.35 360 36 69000 9 1200 0.092 2 350 <0.54 0.15 0.12 100 86 130 110 23 5.7
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL 3%
Page 7 of 10
38 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.7 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.11 0.001 0.13 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 0.065 38 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 12 0.11 0.64 0.66 30 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088 0.11 2.6 3.2 0.036 0.038 0.07 0.092
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.0025 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1
6% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% 5% 0% +/- PQL 0% 27% +/- PQL +/- PQL 6% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 12% 3% 26% 8% 9% +/- PQL +/- PQL 12% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 9% 8% 0% 17% 4% 9%

Parameter Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Bromoform Chloroform Dibromochloromethane Toluene SVOCs bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) Odor Turbidity g/L g/L g/L g/L Units MDL PQL October 2009 HG-7 27-Oct-09 HG-7 DUP 27-Oct-09 -
Page 8 of 10
g/L
5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 33 20 0.5 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.04 0.25 0.05 1 1 1
5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 33 20 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.12 0.5 0.05 1 1 1
480 <2.5 400 46 0.2 31 450 530 840 <0.50 0.18 <0.026 0.0099 0.51 <0.25 7.37 870 none 210
480 <2.5 390 46 0.2 30 460 580 1000 <0.50 0.042 <0.026 0.0094 0.63 <0.25 7.4 871 none 320
0% +/- PQL 3% 0% +/- PQL 3% 2% 9% 17% +/- PQL > +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% 0% 0% 42%
0.0028
0.005
<0.0028 -
<0.0028 -
+/- PQL
70 4 6%

Parameter Metals Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) Units MDL January 2010 PQL SW-2 SW-2 Dup 20-Jan-10 20-Jan-10 50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 <38 0.98 1.5 43 <0.18 36 <0.13 <0.55 1.2 1.8 <9.3 <0.054 3.9 83 27 13 <0.065 <0.11 66 4.1 84 28 13 2.2 13 4900 1.4 2.2 180 <0.20 52 0.49 25 14 8300 2.5 170 0.032 92 77 13 <0.088 0.28 100 89 100 31 13 2.7 <38 0.99 1.5 42 <0.18 35 <0.13 <0.55 1.2 2 <9.3 0.22 4.2 84 27 13 <0.065 <0.11 66 4.4 79 26 12 2.1 12 5200 1.1 2.3 170 <0.20 54 0.44 25 13 9000 2.3 150 <0.016 94 73 13 <0.088 0.14 96 85 100 33 13 2.8
+/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 2% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL
Page 9 of 10
38 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.7 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 0.065 38 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 12 0.11 0.64 0.66 30 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088 0.11 2.6 3.2 0.036 0.038 0.07 0.092
1% 0% 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL 6% 7% 8% +/- PQL 8% 6% +/- PQL +/- PQL 6% +/- PQL +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% 7% 8% +/- PQL 13% +/- PQL 2% 5% 0% +/- PQL +/- PQL 4% 5% 0% 6% 0% +/- PQL

Parameter Pesticides PCBs VOCs Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Bromoform Chloroform Dibromochloromethane Toluene SVOCs bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) Odor Turbidity g/L g/L g/L g/L Units MDL January 2010 PQL SW-2 SW-2 Dup 20-Jan-10 20-Jan-10 -
Page 10 of 10
g/L
5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 20 6.2 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.016 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.5
5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 20 6.2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.5
170 <2.5 140 10 0.13 160 320 410 200 <0.10 0.15 1.4 <0.0081 0.29 <0.050 7.49 602 8 90
170 <2.5 140 10 0.13 160 300 400 190 <0.10 0.07 1.4 <0.0081 0.59 <0.050 7.55 605 4 100
0% +/- PQL 0% 0% +/- PQL 0% 6% 2% 5% +/- PQL +/- PQL 0% +/- PQL 68% +/- PQL 1% 0% >+/- PQL 11%
0.0028
0.005
<0.0028 -
<0.0028 -
+/- PQL
69 2 3%
ATTACHMENT B
ATTACHMENT B Blank Sample Results

February Q MDL PQL FB-1 4-Feb-09 PQL EB-1 15-Apr-09 MDL PQL February Q MDL April Q
Page 1 of 6
EB-1 9-Feb-09
Metals
<38 <0.23 1 0.11 0.058 J J J B,J B,J
38 0.23 0.67 0.068 0.046
50 2 2 1 1
<38 <0.23 <0.67 0.27 <0.046
38 0.23 0.67 0.068 0.046
50 2 2 1 1
B B,J J J J
<0.013 <0.64 <0.7 <0.045 <7.2 <0.019 <0.025 <0.016 J 0.21 <0.04 <0.23 <0.028 <0.054 B J B,J B B,J B,J B,J B B B 0.031 0.04 0.23 0.028 0.054 1 2 2 1 1 4.5 <0.04 <0.23 <0.028 <0.054 B 0.031 0.04 0.23 0.028 0.054 1 2 2 1 1 0.24 <0.04 <0.23 <0.028 0.058 J
0.013 0.64 0.7 0.045 7.2 0.019 0.025 0.016
1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.2
<0.013 <0.64 <0.7 0.25 <7.2 <0.019 0.064 <0.016
0.013 0.64 0.7 0.045 7.2 0.019 0.025 0.016
1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.2
<38 <0.23 <0.67 <0.068 <0.046 14 <0.013 <0.64 <0.7 0.24 8.9 0.019 <0.025 <0.016
38 0.23 0.67 0.068 0.046 4.9 0.013 0.64 0.7 0.045 7.2 0.019 0.025 0.016
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.2
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L J 0.031 0.04 0.23 0.028 0.054 1 2 2 1 1 mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 3 0.2 0.068 0.3 <0.071 <0.038 0.28 0.019 0.021 0.049 0.071 0.038 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 4.8 0.12 0.087 0.39 <0.071 <0.038 0.28 0.019 0.021 0.049 0.071 0.038 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 <0.28 0.092 0.025 0.66 0.13 0.075 J J J J 0.28 0.019 0.021 0.049 0.071 0.038 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2
Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2)
B B,J
B J J
<28 <0.23 <0.82 0.096 0.099 B,J J
28 0.23 0.82 0.072 0.06
50 2 2 1 1
<28 <0.23 <0.82 0.079 <0.06
28 0.23 0.82 0.072 0.06
50 2 2 1 1
J J
B B B B,J
Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag) <0.051 <1.6 0.09 <16 <0.053 0.12 <0.016 <0.031 <0.065 <0.5 <0.064 0.051 1.6 0.045 16 0.053 0.092 0.016 0.031 0.065 0.5 0.064 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L
<0.051 <1.6 0.05 17 <0.053 <0.092 <0.016 1.2 <0.065 <0.5 <0.064
0.051 1.6 0.045 16 0.053 0.092 0.016 0.031 0.065 0.5 0.064
1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
<28 <0.23 <0.82 0.11 <0.06 6.4 <0.051 4.4 1.4 <16 <0.053 5.4 <0.016 1.6 0.99 <0.5 <0.064
28 0.23 0.82 0.072 0.06 6.4 0.051 1.6 0.045 16 0.053 0.092 0.016 0.031 0.065 0.5 0.064
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
Page 2 of 6
g/L g/L g/L 1 J B B,J J J 1 0.054 1 J mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L <0.24 5 <0.23 <0.12 6.5 1.5 5.5 3.7 B,J 1.9 7 2.2 B,J 1.1 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.24 3.3 <0.23 <0.12 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.24 2.9 <0.23 <0.12 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.12 g/L 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4.8 2.4 <0.021 <0.019 <0.053 <0.12 1.3 0.021 0.019 0.053 0.12 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 1.7 <0.021 <0.019 0.12 <0.12 1.3 0.021 0.019 0.053 0.12 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 3.5 <0.021 <0.019 0.059 <0.12 1.3 0.021 0.019 0.053 0.12 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1
Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K)
February EB-1 Q MDL 9-Feb-09 <0.054 0.054 PQL PQL EB-1 15-Apr-09 <0.054 MDL PQL
February FB-1 Q MDL 4-Feb-09 <0.054 0.054
April Q
Bromoform Chloroform Dibromochloromethane Toluene
SVOCs
<5 <2.5 <4.1 <0.075 <0.0083 <0.13 0.67 <6.7
5 2.5 4.1 B 0.075 0.0083 B 0.13 0.1 6.7
5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 6.7
6.9 <2.5 5.6 0.44 <0.01 <0.21
5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21
5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1
J 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L mg/L s.u. umhos/cm odor units NTU mg/L mg/L <0.025 <0.018 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.05 5.66 2.8 No Obs Odor 0.1 <0.0032 B 0.025 0.018 0.0081 0.012 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.0032 5 <2.5 4.1 <0.059 <0.01 <0.21 0.79 <6.7 <5 <0.1 <0.025 <0.026 <0.0081 0.025 <0.05 5.86 2.25 No Obs Odor <0.1 <0.0032 5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 6.7 5 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 J 0.012 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.0032 5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 6.7 5 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005 10 1 <0.1 0.025 <0.026 <0.0081 <0.012 <0.05 5.95 3.77 No Obs Odor 0.11 0.0041 <1.2
Odor Turbidity Cyanide Oil and Grease
10 0.5 0.1 J 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.012 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1 B,J 0.0028 1.2
10 5 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005 7.6
Notes:
Laboratory Qualifiers (Q): J = estimated value below laboratory reporting limit B = detected in blank sample. H = holding time exceeded
bold bold
detected in blank sample detect in blank sample - one or more results qualified as J+

April Q MDL PQL FB-1 22-Sep-09 PQL EB-1 29-Oct-09 PQL September Q MDL October Q MDL
Page 3 of 6
FB 3-Apr-09
Metals
<38 <0.23 <0.67 0.46 J 0.092 J 14 B,J <0.013 B <0.64 <0.7 0.3 B,J <7.2 B <0.019 <0.025 <0.016 B B J J J
38 0.23 0.67 0.068 0.046 4.9 0.013 0.64 0.7 0.045 7.2 0.019 0.025 0.016
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1 0.2
<38 <0.17 <0.52 1.4 <0.18 23 <0.13 <0.55 <0.70 <0.68 <9.3 <0.054 2.4
38 0.17 0.52 0.7 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.22
50 2 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 2
<38 <0.17 <0.52 <0.12 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 <0.55 <0.70 <0.68 <9.3 <0.054 <0.11
38 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.7 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.11
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L 0.32 <0.04 <0.23 0.044 <0.054 J 0.031 0.04 0.23 0.028 0.054 1 2 2 1 1 J J
Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L J 68 B 0.23 0.086 0.12 J 0.14 B,J <0.038 0.28 0.019 0.021 0.049 0.071 0.038 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2 0.00080 11 0.22 <0.38 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 18 0.041 <0.029 0.2 <0.074 <0.065 0.13 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 65 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 200 0.00052 0.21 <0.15 <0.38 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 <1.9 <0.016 <0.029 0.14 <0.074 <0.065 J 0.0002 0.13 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 0.065 0.0005 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2
B B,J J B,J J B,J J B,J
B,J J J
J J J
Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag)
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L 36 <0.23 <0.82 1.2 <0.06 17 <0.051 1.6 0.33 <16 0.064 5.3 0.018 0.16 0.24 <0.5 <0.064 28 0.23 0.82 0.072 0.06 6.4 0.051 1.6 0.045 16 0.053 0.092 0.016 0.031 0.065 0.5 0.064 50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
<76 <0.20 <1.1 <0.21 <0.20 190 <0.11 1 0.81 <60 <0.19 0.11 0.03 <0.23 0.43 <0.54 <0.088
76 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 24 0.11 0.64 0.66 60 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088
100 2 2 1 1 200 1 3 2 100 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
<38 <0.20 <1.1 <0.21 <0.20 <12 <0.11 <0.64 <0.66 <30 <0.19 <0.11 <0.016 <0.23 <0.25 <0.54 <0.088
38 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 12 0.11 0.64 0.66 30 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
Page 4 of 6
g/L g/L g/L 1
April FB Q MDL 3-Apr-09 <0.054 0.054 PQL PQL PQL
October Q MDL
Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L J g/L g/L g/L g/L <0.24 4.9 <0.23 <0.12 2.4 B,J 1.1 4 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 g/L 40 B <0.021 <0.019 0.13 B,J <0.12 1.3 0.021 0.019 0.053 0.12 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1
September FB-1 Q MDL 22-Sep-09 <0.11 0.11 <2.6 2.6 <3.2 3.2 <0.072 0.072 <0.076 0.076 0.26 J 0.14 <0.18 0.18 1 3 5 0.2 0.1 1 2 EB-1 29-Oct-09 <0.11 <2.6 <3.2 <0.036 <0.038 0.24 <0.092 0.11 2.6 3.2 0.036 0.038 0.07 0.092 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1
SVOCs
B,J J
B,J
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L mg/L s.u. umhos/cm odor units NTU mg/L mg/L H 5 5 <2.5 2.5 4.1 4.1 0.19 B,J 0.059 <0.01 0.01 3.5 0.21 <0.1 0.1 10 10 <0.5 0.5 <0.1 0.1 <0.025 0.025 0.047 J 0.026 <0.0081 0.0081 0.13 0.012 <0.05 0.05 6.08 0.05 1.81 1 No Obs Odor 1 <0.1 0.1 0.003 B,J 0.0028 3.8 B,J 1.2 5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 6.7 1.2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005 6.2 5 <2.5 4.1 0.12 <0.010 0.25 <0.10 <6.7 <2.0 <0.10 <0.025 <0.026 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050 6.02 1.7 No Obs Odor <0.10 <0.0028 5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 6.7 2 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.016 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.0028 5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 6.7 2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005 5 <2.5 4.1 <0.059 <0.010 <0.21 <0.10 <6.7 12 <0.10 <0.025 <0.026 0.0089 <0.016 <0.050 5.72 2.39 No Obs Odor <0.10 <0.0028
5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 33 20 0.5 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.04 0.25 0.05 1 1 1 0.0028
5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 33 20 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.12 0.5 0.05 1 1 1 0.005
Notes:
bold bold

December Q MDL PQL FB 20-Jan-10 PQL January Q MDL
Page 5 of 6
EB-1 29-Dec-09
Metals
38 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.7 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.11 B,J J
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1
<38 <0.17 0.64 <0.12 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 <0.55 0.81 <0.68 <9.3 <0.054 <0.11
38 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.18 9.7 0.13 0.55 0.7 0.68 9.3 0.054 0.11
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 2 50 1 1
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L J mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L <38 <0.17 <0.52 <0.12 <0.18 <9.7 <0.13 <0.55 <0.70 <0.68 <9.3 <0.054 <0.11 <0.0002 0.21 <0.15 <0.38 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 <1.9 <0.016 <0.029 <0.12 <0.074 <65 0.0002 0.13 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 65 B 0.0005 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 200 0.00023 <0.13 <0.15 <0.38 <0.065 <0.11 <1.2 <1.9 <0.016 <0.029 <0.12 <0.074 <0.065 0.0002 0.13 0.15 0.38 0.065 0.11 1.2 1.9 0.016 0.029 0.12 0.074 0.065 0.0005 1 2 2 1 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.2
Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium (Be) Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Mercury (Hg) by 1631 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Sodium (Na) Potassium (K) Silicon (as SiO2)
B,J B,J J B,J B,J
Total Recoverable Aluminum (Al) Total Recoverable Antimony (Sb) Total Recoverable Arsenic (As) Total Recoverable Barium (Ba) Total Recoverable Beryllium (Be) Total Recoverable Boron (B) Total Recoverable Cadmium (Cd) Total Recoverable Chromium (Cr) Total Recoverable Copper (Cu) Total Recoverable Iron (Fe) Total Recoverable Lead (Pb) Total Recoverable Manganese (Mn) Total Recoverable Mercury (Hg) Total Recoverable Molybdenum (Mo) Total Recoverable Nickel (Ni) Total Recoverable Selenium (Se) Total Recoverable Silver (Ag)
g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L <38 <0.20 <1.1 <0.21 <0.20 <12 <0.11 <0.64 <0.66 <30 <0.19 <0.11 <0.016 <0.23 0.56 <0.54 <0.088 38 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 12 0.11 0.64 0.66 30 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088 50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1
<38 <0.20 <1.1 <0.21 <0.20 <12 <0.11 <0.64 <0.66 <30 0.78 0.47 0.028 <0.23 0.35 <0.54 <0.088
38 0.2 1.1 0.21 0.2 12 0.11 0.64 0.66 30 0.19 0.11 0.016 0.23 0.25 0.54 0.088
50 2 2 1 1 100 1 3 2 50 1 1 0.2 1 2 2 1

December Q MDL PQL 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 0.11 2.6 3.2 0.036 0.038 0.07 0.092 1 3 5 0.1 0.05 0.5 1 PQL 0.11 2.6 3.2 0.036 0.038 0.07 0.092 FB 20-Jan-10 <0.11 <2.6 <3.2 <0.036 <0.038 <0.070 <0.092 January Q MDL
Page 6 of 6
Total Recoverable Thallium (Tl) Total Recoverable Vanadium (V) Total Recoverable Zinc (Zn) Total Recoverable Calcium (Ca) Total Recoverable Magnesium (Mg) Total Recoverable Sodium (Na) Total Recoverable Potassium (K) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L g/L g/L g/L g/L g/L
g/L g/L g/L
EB-1 29-Dec-09 <0.11 <2.6 <3.2 <0.036 <0.038 <0.070 <0.092
SVOCs
J J B,J
B,J
H B
J H
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate General Chemistry Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Chloride Fluoride Sulfate Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Residual Chlorine Ammonia (as N) Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Total Phosphorus Total Sulfide pH Electrical Conductivity (@ 25 C) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L-N mg/L mg/L s.u. umhos/cm odor units NTU mg/L mg/L H <5.0 <2.5 <4.1 0.4 <0.010 0.36 <0.10 <6.7 <2.0 <0.10 <0.025 <0.026 <0.0081 <0.016 <0.050 5.63 2.33 No Obs Odor <0.10 <0.0028 5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 6.7 2 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.016 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.0028 5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 6.7 2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005 <5.0 <2.5 <4.1 0.25 <0.010 0.22 <0.10 <6.7 <2.0 <0.10 0.065 <0.026 <0.0081 0.018 <0.050 5.36 2.27 No Obs Odor 0.18 <0.0028 5 2.5 4.1 0.059 0.01 0.21 0.1 6.7 2 0.1 0.025 0.026 0.0081 0.016 0.05 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.0028 5 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.05 1 0.5 6.7 2 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 1 1 0.1 0.005
Notes:
bold bold

Volume II - 05 - E - Hydro Logical Investigation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Volume II - 05 - E - Hydro Logical Investigation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Volume II - 05 - E - Hydro Logical Investigation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HYDROLOGIC INVESTIGATION

PERMANENTE QUARRY RECLAMATION PLAN UPDATE SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Project No. 063-7109

hydrologic report_ final

Current Geochemistry Conditions

hydrologic report_ final

This report has been reviewed and approved by:

William L. Fowler, P.G., C.E.G. Associate/Senior Consultant

David Banton Principal/Practice Leader

hydrologic report_ final

1.1.1 1.1.2 1.3 1.4 2.0 2.1 2.2

2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3

2.2.3.1 2.2.3.2 2.2.3.3 2.3 2.4 3.0 3.1

Hydrogeologic Data ..................................................................................................................... 10

Geochemical Data ....................................................................................................................... 12

hydrologic report_ final

Hydrogeologic Units .................................................................................................................... 18

4.4.2.1 4.4.2.2 4.4.2.3 4.5 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.6 4.6.1 4.6.2

Water Balance ............................................................................................................................. 25

Water Balance Estimates .................................................................................................... 28

hydrologic report_ final

May 2010 5.3.6

Simulation of Quarry Development and Reclamation ......................................................... 36

6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.3 6.3.1

Monitoring Results ...................................................................................................................... 45 6.3.1.1 6.3.1.2

6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5

6.3.5.1 6.3.5.2 6.3.5.3 6.3.6 6.3.7 7.0

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

REGIONAL SETTING Topography

hydrologic report_ final

Santa Clara Formation

hydrologic report_ final

2.2.3.3 Landslide Deposits

hydrologic report_ final

hydrologic report_ final

DATA COLLECTION Hydrologic data

TABLE 3.1 Stream Monitoring Station Summary

Station Elevation (ft amsl)

Watershed Area (acres)

662 1,707 419 688

hydrologic report_ final

TABLE 3.2 Borehole Completion Summary

Total Depth (bgs)

Ground Elevation (ft amsl)

Screen Depth or Interval (ft amsl)

Lithology at Screen Location

hydrologic report_ final

Groundwater Level Monitoring

hydrologic report_ final

TABLE 3.3 Analytical Parameter Summary

2nd Round April 2009