EXHIBIT 2 IFAS Table for World Wildlife Fund for Nature, 2015

Weighted
Internal Factors Weight Rating Score Comments

Strengths
 Quality WWF’S nurtured
culture 0.15 5.0 0.75
 Global Partnership 0.20 4.0 0.8
 Financial Position 0.10 4.5 0.45
 Advertisements 0.05 3.0 0.15
 Global Goal on
Adaptation 0.10 3.6 0.36
Weaknesses
 Process-oriented R&D 0.02 3.0 0.06
 Global positioning 0.08 3.5 0.24
 Manufacturing facilities 0.10 2.0 0.2
 Company culture
differentiation 0.15 5.0 0.75
 Limited human
resources 0.05 4.0 0.2
1.00 3.96

EXHIBIT 3 SFAS Table for World Wildlife Fund for Nature, 2015
 I
N
T
E
R
M
E
S D
H I L
O A O
Weighted R T N
Strategic Factors Weight Rating Score T E G Comments
 Quality WWF’s
nurtured culture Quality key to
(S) 0.16 3.3 x success
0.53
 Financial
position (S) 0.04 4.5 x x Average to high debt
0.18
 Company culture
differentiation
(W) 0.14 3.1 x x WWF quality
0.43
 Global
positioning (W) 0.23 4.6 x x Over 100 countries
1.06
 Global
awareness of
wildlife welfare
(O) 0.11 5.0 x Will take time
0.55
 Green economy May take lot of time
development (O) 0.18 3.5 x x and effort
0.63
 Deterioration of
wildlife Possibility of specie
population (T) 0.09 4.3 x extiction
0.39
 Contributors
concentrated
into a specific WWF weak in other
region (T) 0.05 3.0 x x regions
0.15
1.00 3.92