Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pharmaceutical Technology Oct 2021 Api
Pharmaceutical Technology Oct 2021 Api
October 2021
October 2021
J
ust in time (JIT) manufacturing aims to reduce flow times within manufacturing systems while cutting response times from suppliers
and thence to customers. Under favorable circumstances, it’s a helpful tool for a manufacturer’s overarching strategy. With the emergence
of additive manufacturing alongside rising software sophistication, JIT’s dominance of supply chain management appeared assured.
And then COVID-19 hit.
MJH Life Sciences sees CPhI’s global event in Milan, Italy as an ideal meeting place to rethink, recalibrate, and retool for the next decade
of pharmaceutical manufacturing expansion. The ability to congregate face-to-face is a clear opportunity to build on that sense of community,
which is so strong in the pharmaceutical industry. Among the many trends accelerated by the pandemic, the urgent requirement to build multiple
additional supply partners into any future proofed supply and distribution chain has become clear. An anticipated vial shortage never became
a critical bottleneck, partly because the raw materials themselves failed to arrive. Large companies had leveraged their outsized influence over
suppliers—sometimes at the expense of customers, sometimes countries, and sometimes patients. This reinforces the necessity for face-to-face
meetings, to rebuild trust, and to reduce hoarding and the threatening implicit bias of regionalism.
Rejoin the pharmaceutical community in Milan to engage with new partners, and to energize a supply chain infrastructure strategy with
inherent adaptability and parallel inputs. Celebrate the obvious successes the industry had in meeting the COVID-19 challenge, and re-tool
with a new understanding of how best to face common goals—together. PT
Send your thoughts and story ideas to:
cspivey@mjhlifesciences.com.
© 2021 MultiMedia Pharma Sciences LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including by photocopy, recording, or information storage
and retrieval without permission in writing from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal/educational or personal use, or the internal/educational or personal use of specific clients is granted by MultiMedia Pharma Sciences
LLC for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Dr. Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400 fax 978-646-8700 or visit http://www.copyright.com online. For uses beyond those listed above, please
direct your written request to PTpress@mmhgroup.com with “Permissions” in the subject line.
MultiMedia Pharma Sciences LLC provides certain customer contact data (such as customers name, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses) to third parties who wish to promote relevant products, services, and other opportunities
that may be of interest to you. If you do not want MultiMedia Pharma Sciences LLC to make your contact information available to third parties for marketing purposes, simply email mmhinfo@mmhgroup.com and a customer service represent-
ative will assist you in removing your name from MultiMedia Pharma Sciences LLC lists.
Pharmaceutical Technology does not verify any claims or other information appearing in any of the advertisements contained in the publication, and cannot take responsibility for any losses or other damages incurred by readers in reliance of
such content. Pharmaceutical Technology welcomes unsolicited articles, manuscripts, photographs, illustrations, and other materials but cannot be held responsible for their safekeeping or return.
Reprints: Contact Mike Tracey, mtracey@mjhlifesciences.com. Display, Web, Classified, and Recruitment Advertising: Contact, tel. 732.346.3027. Permissions: Submit a request to PTpress@mmhgroup.com with “Permissions” in the subject line.
To subscribe: mmhinfo@mmhgroup.com
APIs, Excipients, and Manufacturing 2021
APIs
EXCIPIENTS
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT
QUALITY
68 Ad Index
Cover image: Syda Productions - stock.adobe.com; Cover design, Maria Reyes
CHOOSE FROM
4 CART
STYLES
Custom Built Carts also available.
MOVE PRODUCTS
NOT CONTAMINATION
SEPARATING ROOM CLASSIFICATIONS
LINE OF DEMARCATION ELIMINATE CART WHEEL DISINFECTION
A
Between dosage form pproximately 58% of drug products in development are
versatility, product stability, small molecules, according to a Thermo Fisher article
lack of storage restrictions or
(1). Moreover, a 2021 report by Market Research Future
need to refrigerate, and an
easier means of purification, estimates that the small-molecule API market will reach
small-molecule APIs present US$279,697.1 million by 2027 (2). This includes both in-house manufac-
an appealing market niche. turing and contract manufacturing. Some of the drivers of this growth,
according to the same report, include a “growing demand for newly de-
veloped small molecule drugs” and “the changing nature of drugs” (2).
But that isn’t the only upward prediction for the small-molecule API
market. In a report by Data Bridge Market Research, an 8.05% com-
pound annual growth rate market growth is predicted from 2021 to
2028, and technological advancement and innovations may lead to prof-
itable opportunities for players in the small molecule API market (3).
Seeking Economies
of Scale for Biocatalysis
Mark Muldowney and Greg Holgate
T
New enzymes and protein he advantages that enzymes have as biocatalysts are well
engineering have advanced known within the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry,
biocatalysis processing not least that they can give excellent specificity and yields,
toward commercial
acceptance. Technology and even facilitate reactions that are difficult with chemi-
and economic roadblocks cal catalysts. Their credentials towards improving sustainability are also
must be overcome for the increasing the levels of interest for process development, as biocatalytic
process to be widely reactions can be more efficient in terms of solvent and material use.
embraced by pharma.
The efficacy of some enzymes can be very high. For example, the en-
zyme carbonic anhydrase has been shown to catalyze the hydration of 4
million molecules of carbon dioxide per second, which is near the limit
of turnover dictated by diffusion. While this is an extreme case, a well-
chosen enzyme should be able to give a high yield in a short time.
Humans have long benefitted from biocatalytic reactions—despite not
understanding the scientific processes—with yeasts reportedly being
used in brewing about 8000 years ago. It was not until the 1830s, however,
that the source of the reaction was determined by chemists in a French
sugar factory, when they isolated the enzyme diastase. It was another 60
years before the German chemist, Eduard Buchner, showed that enzymes
could be used as chemical catalysts without cells, and it was for this work
that he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1907.
SERGEY YAROCHKIN - STOCK.ADOBE.COM
P
Navigating a complex global rior to the commercialization phase for API manufacturing,
regulatory landscape there is a lot to juggle as well as a tricky global regulatory
involves upfront research
landscape to navigate. API manufacturers must meet the
into the expectations of the
different regulatory bodies, standards for the country where the drug will be distrib-
thorough documentation of uted, and every country has their own regulations as well as their own
every step of the API interpretation of those regulations.
manufacturing process, and
“Ahead of commercialization, regulators expect pharmaceutical
good communication.
companies to document a robust manufacturing process. The pro-
cess must be validated prior to commercialization, and the data and a
succinct discussion must be available for regulatory assessment,” says
Jakob Bonde, head of regulatory affairs, small molecules (DS and DP)/
associated regulatory affairs director, Lonza. “The validated process
should implicitly reflect the required process knowledge for control
of materials, impurities, and physical properties, as well as stability of
the API. A good manufacturing and development partner can help
speed this process by ensuring that the right data are provided in ap-
plications, and the relevant details on materials are included.”
According to Steven Lynn, RCA executive VP, pharmaceuticals, and
Susan Schniepp, RCA distinguished fellow, Regulatory Compliance
MAGELE-PICTURE - STOCK.ADOBE.COM
Building Robust
Specifications Using
Powder Testing
Jamie Clayton
T
Advanced powder
testing is a useful tool to he COVID-19 pandemic has drawn attention to
differentiate materials and pharmaceutical supply chains, notably increasing public
optimize the supply chain. awareness of how and where drugs and vaccines are
made. While the United States and European Union
(EU) retain the two top spots in terms of number of FDA-registered
manufacturing plants, China and India, together, now account for
31% of these facilities. India alone supplies 40% of the world’s
generic drugs but relies on China for 70% of the raw materials
and APIs used to make them (1). This complex supply network
has flexed rapidly and successfully to answer to the demands of
the pandemic, with manufacturing plants switched to the produc-
tion of hand sanitizer, manufacture of materials in short supply
due to regional outbreaks, or, for the longer term, making respi-
ratory drugs and vaccines. However, changes in supply chain or
plant use are challenging for this heavily regulated industry,
particularly given the criticality of product quality and safety.
Reliable specifications, for products and raw materials, pro-
vide a secure foundation for those navigating the global phar-
maceutical supply network and are increasingly important as the
industry regroups, drawing on lessons learned. Powders are par-
PAYLESSIMAGES - STOCK.ADOBE.COM
there is some understanding of the influence of Dynamic powder properties, measured using
particle properties, such as size, shape, surface a powder rheometer, are routinely identified as a
roughness, and density, on bulk powder properties, critical element of specifications developed in this
such as flowability, the relationships are complex, way. Such properties are highly reproducible and
with system variables, such as degree of aeration sensitive and have a proven track record of process
and moisture content, also having a significant in- relevance (4). Given that a powder rheometer speci-
fluence. Predicting bulk powder properties is not fied for dynamic powder testing also offers shear
feasible; measurement is essential. and bulk property measurements, such instrumen-
The question of which properties to measure is tation can be a good place to start when building a
crucial. An approach gaining traction (2,3) is to bulk powder property database to support supply
measure a broad range of properties, thereby devel- chain optimization (5).
FIGURES COURTESY OF THE AUTHOR
oping a material property database for the powder, Case study 1: Evaluating pharmaceutical excipients.
and to then identify relevant properties through Flowability testing was performed on six com-
correlation with process performance. This ap- mercial samples of lactose intended for oral solid
proach pinpoints the properties that capture the dosage formulation. Three were milled products
majority of variability in a given unit operation and from DFE Pharma (Goch, Germany): Pharmatose
that can be used to develop a robust specification. 200M EU, Pharmatose 200M NZ, and Lactochem
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 25
Excipients
Figure 2. Inter-batch variability is significant for certain lactose products indicating that they could exhibit variable
process performance. RSD is relative standard deviation, and LCFP is Lactochem Fine Powder.
Fine Powder (LCFP); the others were competitor Figure 2 shows data comparing inter-batch vari-
products. Dynamic f low properties were mea- ability (the %RSD associated with measurements
sured in triplicate (FT4 Powder Rheometer, Free- on three different batches of each product). These
man Technology) for each of three batches of each results highlight significant differences, which, be-
product. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of cause of the repeatability of the instrument already
basic flowability energy (BFE), a baseline dynamic demonstrated by the low intra-batch variability, can
property that quantifies flowability under forced- securely be associated with batch-to-batch variabil-
flow conditions, was used to assess consistency. ity. While three of the products exhibit relatively low
Figure 1 shows data comparing intra-batch vari- RSDs of ~6% or less, that of Competitor 3 is around
ability (the %RSD associated with the triplicate 15%. BFE has been securely correlated with perfor-
measurements of each batch). These results show mance in processes such as die-filling and blend-
no evidence of variability within an individual ing (4), so variability in this parameter could be sig-
batch, for any of the products. They also highlight nificant from the perspective of process efficiency.
the repeatability of the measurement technique. More generally, the study demonstrates the ability
Many powder testing techniques exhibit poor re- of dynamic testing to reliably differentiate the con-
peatability, compromising their ability to detect sistency of supplies and support supplier selection.
variability between samples, so this is an impor- Case study 2: Focusing on flow additives. In a second
tant observation. study, dynamic, shear, and bulk powder proper-
26 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
Excipients
powder property that, like BFE, quantifies the
Figure 3. Specific energy (SE), compressibility, and
permeability values for five commercial untreated flowability of powders in a low stress state. How-
fumed silica supplies show clear differences between
ever, in contrast to BFE, SE is measured with an
the materials.
upward traverse of the powder rheometer blade
that subjects the powder to a gentle, lifting action.
Therefore, SE quantifies how a powder will be-
have in an unconfined state, when flowing under
gravity, rather than under the forcing conditions
applied in BFE measurement. Higher SE values
are typically associated with a greater degree of
mechanical interlocking and friction between
particles in the powder, as a result of particle
morphology—particle size, shape, and/or surface
roughness.
Sample 1 generates the highest SE value, which
is almost double that of the lowest, Sample 4. This
suggests that Sample 1 may be significantly more
difficult to mix and disperse through a bulk sub-
strate, which is an important characteristic for a
flow aid. SE values provide a useful ranking of
the supplies, in terms of this behavior.
Compressibility is quantified in terms of per-
centage change in volume (or density) as a func-
tion of applied normal stress. The results show
that Sample 5 is the most compressible material
ties were measured for five different commercial tested, while Samples 1, 2, and 3 have similar,
samples of untreated fumed silica, which is a flow much lower compressibility. Powders that are
aid used routinely in the pharmaceutical industry. more cohesive typically exhibit high compress-
Each of the samples was purchased from a different ibility because of their ability to entrain air
supplier but all had a similar D50 (median particle within an inefficiently packed powder bulk. As
size) and particle size distribution. All properties normal stress is increased, this air is forced out,
were measured using standard test protocols for significantly reducing volume. From a practi-
the instrument (FT4 Powder Rheometer, Freeman cal perspective, powders that exhibit high com-
Technology) (6). pressibility are more susceptible to consolidation.
Figure 3 highlights differences between the five These results indicate that Samples 1, 2, and 3 are
supplies with respect to specific energy (SE), com- less likely than Sample 4 and most of all Sample 5
pressibility, and permeability. SE is a dynamic to exhibit substantial consolidation during long-
28 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
term storage under stress, for example, under likelihood of detecting differences, thereby maxi-
their own weight in a hopper or storage vessel. mizing a manufacturer’s ability to judge whether
Such compressibility can also indicate a potential supplies are equally acceptable.
for difficulty in feeding or tableting operations.
Permeability values quantify a powder’s ability Looking ahead
to transmit air and are determined from measure- New pressures on supply chain management in-
ments of pressure drop across a powder bed at a tensify requirements for robust specifications for
constant, defined air flow rate. Sample 5 gener- products and raw materials. Identifying the prop-
ates the highest pressure drop, indicating that it is erties that define the in-process performance of
the least permeable sample. Like compressibility, raw ingredients and feedstocks, and their com-
permeability is often linked with cohesion in the patibility with different equipment, is critical
powder bed, with more cohesive powders exert- for manufacturers. Powders can be particularly
ing greater resistance to air flow. Powders with challenging in this regard, with specifications
low permeability do not release air easily and this routinely failing to detect a material that goes on
can be problematic in processes such as die fill- to exhibit poor performance.
ing and tableting. Complete, uniform die-filling The data presented here illustrate how advanced
relies on the powder settling to form a uniform, powder testing based on the measurement of dy-
efficiently packed dose; tablets containing air are namic, shear, and bulk properties, can sensitively
more likely to be physically unstable and prone differentiate materials that are notionally com-
to capping. More generally, low permeability can parable, helping manufacturers to make a smart,
also adversely impact gravitational flow (4). informed choice of supplier. Armed with a clear
Shear stress, a shear property, was also mea- understanding of exactly what constitutes an ac-
sured in this study, but the results provided no ceptable supply, manufacturers are in a better
differentiation, exhibiting a %RSD of ~6% across position to build a supply network that answers
all five materials. Shear cell analysis is a valu- to economic constraints while simultaneously
able technique for assessing the ease with which meeting evolving needs. Such understanding also
a powder transitions from the static to dynamic provides a secure foundation for the adaptation
state following consolidation, and the data sug- of existing processes to deliver new drugs, in
gest that in such circumstances, the powders may response to disrupted supply chains or grow-
behave comparably. Set against this result are the ing demand.
dynamic and bulk property data that suggest the
powders may behave differently. In reality, the rel- References
1. R. Mullin, Chem. Eng. News, 98 (16) 30 (2020).
evance of different properties varies from process 2. B. Van Snick, et al., Int. J. Pharm., 549 (1–2) 415–435 (2018).
3. M.S. Escotet-Espinoza, et al., Powder Technol., 339, 659–676
to process, highlighting the importance of testing (2018).
powders under relevant conditions and identify- 4. J. Clayton, Org. Process Res. Dev., 19 (1) 102–109 (2015).
5. J. Clayton and T. Mollner, “Integrating Powder Characteriza-
ing which properties are most applicable. Sensi- tion into Raw Material Selection and Process Optimization,”
PharmTech.com, Article (Oct. 1, 2019).
tive, multi-faceted powder testing maximizes the 6. R. Freeman, Powder Technology, 174 (1) 25-33 (2007). PT
M
A multilayered processing icronization is an important tool for developing new
approach ensures safe drugs, its primary advantage being that it is scalable
handling and content
from the early stages of development through to com-
uniformity of highly
potent APIs. mercial volumes. The micronization process is both
well-understood and cost-effective.
With the increased number of potent drugs in development, having
the capabilities to handle and process them is becoming imperative. De-
velopment partners with the specialized expertise and infrastructure
required to handle potent APIs play a key role in the supply chain of next
generation medicines.
Particle-size reduction leads to an increase in the surface area of drug
molecules, enabling a faster dissolution rate while potentially improv-
ing the bioavailability of poorly soluble compounds. By controlling the
particle size, better content uniformity is achievable, as well as reduced
segregation/sedimentation of formulation blends.
For high potency APIs (HPAPIs), micronization is a cost-effective
method of helping to ensure content uniformity. For HPAPIs, where
batch volumes are often smaller and of higher value, ensuring dose uni-
formity and reducing process waste is crucial. Beyond HPAPIs, microni-
zation is useful for the development of inhaled powders, oral suspensions,
and ocular formulations, as these approaches require a specific particle
KWANCHAIFT - STOCK.ADOBE.COM
210-476-8100 | DPTLabs.com
Manufacturing
Table I, is used as a formulation development tool to Co-micronization consists of two steps: blending
help assess the best formulation for an API. The DCS the API with an appropriate surfactant and subjecting
categorizes APIs according to their dose solubility the mixture to the standard micronization process.
ratio and permeability. Those APIs that are amenable The surfactant enables more of the drug to dissolve
to simple tableting or powder-in-capsule delivery are and is more commonly used to overcome develop-
likely to fall into Class I, as molecules that are both ment challenges with drugs that are both highly po-
soluble at their administered dose and fully permeable, tent but poorly soluble. Along with improving solu-
whereas those that are neither soluble at a given dose bility, co-micronization can improve flowability of
nor permeable, fall into Class IV. Many drugs now in micronized powders, reduce re-agglomeration, and
development fall into Class II, having low solubility improve the wettability of micronized particles.
at the given dose but high permeability. Drugs that
have poor permeability properties but readily dissolve Jet milling process
represent DCS Class III compounds. Of the micronization options available to devel-
The DCS gives greater insight into the solubility opers, jet milling is one of the most common, as
behavior of molecules in Class II, by splitting it into it allows material with an average particle size of
two sub-classifications. This split is made based on the 1–10 microns to be produced. A jet mill has no
concept of a solubility-limited absorbable dose (SLAD), moving parts, does not heat up, and is relatively
which represents the dose above which absorption of simple to operate.
a compound is limited by its solubility. At doses below Jet mills use high-pressure nitrogen gas to force
the SLAD, designated DCS IIa compounds, a drug’s the API into the mill, where the API particles collide
absorption is limited by its dissolution rate, whereas with each other and the sides of the mill, reducing
at doses above the SLAD, the absorption is limited particle size. The flexibility and scalability of the
by the drug’s intrinsic solubility. These are designated process allows quantities from just a few grams of
DCS IIb compounds. API, right through to metric ton quantities, to be
Micronization is effective at improving the dissolu- micronized as the size of the mill is increased.
tion rate for DCS Class IIa compounds and making
them easier to dissolve. It is not typically the primary Handling HPAPIs
tool to address the challenges of DCS IIb molecules, As with handling HPAPIs at any stage of process-
but for those that are close to the border between ing, when looking to micronize potentially potent
DCS IIa and IIb, co-micronization can be an effec- and harmful compounds, there are many consid-
tive method to improve solubility. erations to weigh. Depending on the drug develop-
5 advanced technologies | parallel screening | prototypes in 12 weeks | pbpk modelling | dedicated science advisor
WHERE SCIENCE
MEETS ART.™
us + 1 888 SOLUTION (765-8846) EUR 00800 8855 6178 catalent.com/ofss © 2021 Catalent, Inc. All rights reserved.
Manufacturing
ment stage, adequate toxicity information could be flags in the molecule and comparator molecules.
lacking, and therefore it is common to use default For preclinical programs, in-vitro genotoxicity data
classifications (both potent and toxic) to ensure may be available, as well as information on the
worker safety during manufacturing. Matching the mechanism of action and cytotoxicity. Through
compound to the micronization capabilities, and the clinical phases, information on animal stud-
securing appropriate containment equipment, are ies, expected dosage levels and human data will be
the next steps of program onboarding. generated, and as the data package increases with
A materials categorization group, perhaps sup- information, assessment on necessary handling
ported by expert opinion, reviews API data to and containment may need re-evaluating.
decide whether a company’s facilities and equip- When working with full commercial products, a
ment are capable of undertaking the manufactur- full data package is required as a safety data sheet
ing process. Typically, the information required at (SDS) is unlikely to be enough, and a permitted
this stage includes matching the API characteris- daily exposure (PDE) limit or an occupational ex-
tics to facility capabilities; identifying the needs for posure band (OEB)/occupational exposure limit
equipment containment and the equipment scale re- (OEL) report from a toxicologist is important.
quired; specifying the cleaning of multi-use equip-
ment; the desired yield; and whatever containment Onion skin approach
monitoring may be necessary. Other information The onion skin model (Figure 1) illustrates a design
to be considered may cover restricted drug classes, philosophy that allows containment activities to
controlled drugs, and environmental issues. be built out from a core to ensure all controls and
Once the material categorization has been assessed measures are in place for effective handling and
alongside the necessary control measures, options operator safety.
can range from processing of non-potent APIs in an At the center is “control at source,” which involves
open bay, the use of flexible containers, or processing the appropriate equipment to be installed within a
in hard-wall isolators for HPAPIs. facility to carry out the micronization, at the ap-
The priority is to ensure operator safety and hav- propriate scale, and with the correct seals to handle
ing the appropriate containment measures and equip- potentially hazardous materials. Beyond that are
ment cleaning processes in place to reduce risk of ex- the engineering controls that cover the contain-
posure. Investment in equipment, operator training ment and isolation requirements. The third layer is
in current good manufacturing practices, process the transfer ports and interface into the isolators,
safety, and cleaning procedures are paramount. which are crucial to ensure containment integrity.
The development phase of a drug will influence The final, “physical” layer is the design of the facility,
what data should be available; and a more conser- with its extraction system, and access controls for
vative approach may be required if data are miss- staff into the area handling the materials.
ing. For a drug at a very early development stage, Above the physical installation are the processes
clues to its potency may need to be taken from that dictate the safe handling, the establishment
the targeted therapeutic area, alongside structural of standard operating procedures and paperwork,
34 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
Figure 1. The “onion skin” design philosophy.
is highly efficient at protecting
operators, and is designed to give
maximum external environmen-
tal protection from the HPAPI.
Other benefits include accurate
control of temperature and rela-
tive humidity, and the capability
to operate under controlled light-
ing conditions when processing
light-sensitive compounds.
and the cleaning and maintenance of the facility. Assessing outsourcing needs
Staff must be trained and educated on safe work- For developers looking to choose an outsourcing
ing practices along with ongoing monitoring of the partner for HPAPI drug development, it is crucial
facility to ensure its continued compliance with to assess the needs of the project in terms of end
regulations and design protocols. result, but where safety is paramount, the invest-
ment and operating practices of a company are a
Hardwall containment top priority. Finding a partner that has the expe-
For maximum containment when processing rience, infrastructure, and capabilities to handle
HPAPIs, a hardwall approach is the most effective, projects as development progresses can help re-
and can enable facilities to handle OELs as low as duce the risk of projects being delayed and im-
tens of nanograms per cubic meter. pacting the success of a commercial launch.
In these scenarios, micronizers can be installed With the growing number of drugs that are being
within isolators purged with nitrogen for enhanced developed considered potent or highly potent, the
manufacturing safety, eliminating the risk of dust outsourcing industry has adapted, and there has
explosion for compounds with low minimum ig- been large-scale investment among service compa-
nition energy values. The size of the facility can nies to accommodate the need for manufacturing
be up to commercial scale, and can provide better with HPAPIs. What is also known is that HPAPIs
efficiency by utilizing continuous milling opera- have formulation challenges in terms of solubility
tion, eliminating the need to stop and change out and dose uniformity, and micronization can play a
raw material or micronized drums. An automated key part in ensuring these new drugs can be deliv-
FIGURE COURTESY OF THE AUTHORS.
washing system can be included to reduce operator ered effectively to patients. Its applicability to HPA-
intervention, as well as options to accommodate PIs in terms of yield efficiency, scale up capabilities,
flexible sampling schemes without the need for cost-effectiveness, and regulatory understanding
external equipment. means micronization is a solution that can assist at
Such a system requires significant capital expen- early stage development and continue throughout a
diture, but gives a very high degree of automation, drug’s journey towards commercialization. PT
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 35
Manufacturing
I
Experts share best practices n inhalation drug delivery, various milling and micronization
in designing, manufacturing, processes have been used to manufacture particles for dry pow-
and scaling up dry powder der inhaler (DPI) and metered dose inhaler (MDI) drug–device
inhaler and metered dose
inhaler drug–device combination products. The trend today, however, is an increas-
combination products for ing use of engineered particles, such as those made by spray drying
inhalation drug delivery. for DPI applications. Pharmaceutical Techology spoke with Carolyn
Berg, vice-president, Inhalation and Carla Vozone, vice-president, In-
halation Strategy, Innovation, and Partnerships, at Catalent; Robin
Heath, head of new product innovation and commercial management,
and Peter Hirst, commercial vice-president, at Recipharm; and Sandy
Munro, senior vice-president, pharmaceutical development, at Vec-
tura. These contract development and manufacturing organization
(CDMO) experts shared their perspective on trends and consider-
ations for choosing and designing a drug delivery device.
[where] the molecules are potent and, most importantly, to meet the target
product profile of the products in development. Achieving an exact par-
ticle size and characteristic that will translate into a clinical benefit is key.
Inhaled particle engineering has paved the way for drugs to be devel-
oped to tackle more complex diseases, such as lung cancers and infec-
36 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
Model 0.1
Model 100
Model 001
Model 004
Model 050
Model 032
POWDER PROCESSING • ENGINEERING SERVICES • RETROFITS – FLUID AIR & NON-FLUID AIR
SERVICES
I
A modular toolbox n continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing, real-time
enables residence time assurance of critical quality attributes (CQAs) is highly desired.
distribution-based control for
Among CQAs, control and assurance of tablet potency has
continuous pharmaceutical
manufacturing. been challenging due to lack of real-time measurement sensors
tied to optimization programs. A modular self-contained toolbox
developed using Python programming has been demonstrated to
predict tablet potency based on a residence time distribution (RTD)
model and apply a diversion strategy to divert out-of-specification
tablets. The modular toolbox can be integrated with any commer-
cially availabe tools to control tablet potency, can automatically
calibrate the RTD model for different formulations and processes,
and can be used to predict outlet concentrations, assuming accu-
rately quantified inputs.
Calculated
Pulse response Convolution
outlet concentration
components outside of the preset limits. Addition- and real-time inlet concentration. The toolbox
ally, the toolbox can fit the RTD model to a series will compute the convolution of the RTD model
of experimental data to calculate RTD parameters. with the inlet concentration and provide real-
The current version of the RTD based toolbox time predictions of the outlet concentrations of
has two modules. For prediction of the outlet con- the product. Figure 1 shows the general workflow
centration, the inputs are RTD model parameters of this module.
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 45
Manufacturing
The toolbox can be integrated with sensor de- point per second. Higher frequency is supported, but
vices and real-time monitoring software to col- modification of the code is needed. Once the direc-
lect data from the plant. The prediction and the tion and filename are selected, the RTD-based control
diverge signal can be sent to control platforms to toolbox will monitor the .csv file and read new inlet
communicate with the reject gate or a direct com- concentration data points from the file.
munication with the plant can be established. For Similar to the inlet concentration, the RTD model
RTD model fitting, a measured pulse or step re- parameters should be stored in a .csv file. Parameters
sponse of certain inlet concentrations is needed as fitted in an RTD model fmodule can be read as well
inputs. Fitting will be done by the program auto- as other parameters generated from different sources.
matically with RTD model parameters as outputs. After reading all inputs, the RTD-based control
toolbox convolutes the data point with the RTD
Real-time prediction of model. According to the properties of convolution,
tablet content uniformity adding the convolution results of each input data
An RTD model is used to predict the outlet con- point in time series will lead to the convolution of the
&'()*+)
centration of the tablets from a continuous phar- whole input signal. Each time the prediction of outlet
&'()*+) maceutical manufacturing plant
!!"# "#$ % & !$% "#$ ' ("#$!! !
based Equation 1: concentrations will be compared with the preset upper
!"#$%&'%
and lower limits, before running the program. If the
!!"# "#$ % & !$% "#$ ' ("#$!! ! !"#$%&'%
&'(),+) prediction falls within the limitation, the reject signal
[Eq. 1] of tablets will be 0, meaning that the tablets produced
&'(),+) '#(#! )"#$ '
#"&'('! )
)
where E(t) ("#
is the)pulse
#& $ %response%of" an * RTD% model, are qualified. Otherwise, the reject signal will be 1,
&! !"#$%('%
'%*+),- .
Cin is the real time input concentration,
'#(#! )"#$ ' and
"
) out is
#"&'('! ) C and the rejection gate will reject the produced tablets.
("# ) #& $ % % " * % &! !"#$%('%
the outlet concentration. This RTD-based
'%*+),- . control
" !"#$%&'()*+)
toolbox keeps computing convolution of the inlet RTD modeling and experimental data
concentration with the pre-fitted RTD !"#$%&'()*+)
model. !!"# "#$ %
The tank-in-series modeling ' ("#$!! has! been
& !$% "#$ approach !"#$%&'%
used
to develop! this"#$
toolbox.
% & !$%The
"#$ module
' ("#$!!is used
! to!"#$%&'%
fit an
The toolbox can output !"#$%&'(),+)
!"#
RTD-model based on Equation 2:
a diversion signal for the
!"#$%&'(),+) '#(#! )"#$
#"&'('! )
' )
("# ) #& $ % "* &! !"#$%('%
rejection gate, to divert tablets %
'%*+),- .
"
%
#"&'('! )
'#(#! )"#$
containing components ("# ) #& $ % % "
'%*+),- .
*'
&! !"#$%('%
%
)
) " [Eq. 2]
outside of the preset limits. Here, E(t+td) is the response signal, n is the number
)
The inlet concentration should be a real-time of tanks that need to be determined, τ and td are fur-
updated .csv file, which can be generated by a real- ther parameters which need to be determined. Among
time prediction tool (e.g., Process Pulse II [CAMO]). them, τ is the mean residence time and td stands for the
The real-time prediction tool should receive inlet delay time. To determine RTD parameters, an experi-
raw data (spectra) from near infrared sensors and ment was performed to generate the outlet concentra-
update the input file frequently, less than one data tion response of a pulse or step input concentration.
46 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
Figure 3. The verification of the tool. Measured concentration and fitted model.
The parameters, n, τand td are Figure 4. Pulse response of residence time distribution (RTD) model.
obtained through parameter esti-
mation, which minimizes the dif-
ference between the experimental
and predicted outlet concentration
E(t+td). This optimization is based
on Nelder-Mead method, which is
integrated into the Python library
scipy.optimize and with the help of
open-source tool fminsearchbnd.py.
Figure 3 shows verification of the
toolbox. Note that, the experimen-
tal data points are measured from
a different unit operation (feeder)
and are not the RTD data needed
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 47
Manufacturing
Figure 5. Prediction of outlet concentration and reject signal. 1: accept, 0: reject.
Shining a Light on
Photochemistry in Flow
Andrew Mansfield
C
The ever-increasing interest hemists in academia and industry have been performing
in photochemistry has reactions that are initiated by heat or a chemical reagent
inspired the development of for many centuries. Advancements in technology com-
innovative, modular flow
photochemistry reactors. bined with the rediscovery of new ‘reagentless’ activa-
tion methods—such as using light in photochemistry and electrons
in electrochemistry—have changed the way researchers devise syn-
thesis routes toward novel molecules and set up their experiments.
Photochemistry has gained much recognition over the past 20 years,
and this growing trend has led to the development of innovative,
modular flow photochemistry systems that allow users to efficiently
switch between chemistries—saving time and money.
Historical background
Photochemistry is a branch of science concerned with the chemical
effects of light, and, in nature, it is the basis of photosynthesis. In
chemistry, the fundamental aim is the selective activation of mol-
ecules to promote novel chemical transformations that are cleaner
and greener under mild conditions. Traditionally, natural light from
the sun and mercury or xenon lamps were used to perform photo-
SERGEY YAROCHKIN - STOCK.ADOBE.COM
distekinc.com • info@distekinc.com
Figure 1. Photooxgenation set-up in flow to make a key cannabidiol intermediate from (R)-limonene. TPP is
tetraphenylporphyrin. BPR is back pressure regulator. GPR is gas pressure regulator. LED is light-emitting diode.
e ue h er e ce ur e che
our
Brochure Here
u o er er ce ee e our
r ue
References
1. D. Cambié, et al., Chem. Rev. 116 (17) 10276–10341 (2016). 7. N.J.W. Straathof, et al., ChemSusChem 7 (6) 1612–1617 (2014).
2. J.H. Rigby, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (28) 6624–6628 (2000). 8. N.J.W. Straathof, et al., J. Flow Chem. 4 (1) 12–17 (2014).
3. C. Sambiagio, et al., Trends Chem. 2 (2) 92–106 (2020). 9. A.R. Aguillón, et al., Org. Process Res. Dev. 24 (10) 2017–2024
(2020).
4. M.B. Plutschack, et al., Chem. Rev. 117 (18) 11796–11893 (2017). 10. I. Abdiaj, et al., J. Org. Chem. 84 (8) 4748–4753 (2019).
5. N. Hoffman, Chemical Photocatalysis, B. König, Ed., pp. 111–138 11. D.A. DiRocco, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (19) 4802–4806
(De Gruyter, Berlin, 2013). (2014).
6. M. Waterford, et al., Aust. J. Chem. 74, 569–573 (2021). 12. D. Chandrasekhar, et al., Org. Lett. 18 (12) 2974–2977 (2016). PT
CALL
ER
and large molecules) and finished drug-products (solid dosage, semisolid, FOR
PAPE
liquids, parenteral drugs and topical drugs), drug-delivery technologies, RS
C AL
R P
APERS
quality control, validation and advances in pharmaceutical equipment,
machinery, instrumentation, facility design and plant operations.
We are currently seeking novel research articles for our peer-
reviewed journal as well as manuscripts for our special issues. For
peer-reviewed papers, members of the Editorial Advisory Board of
Pharmaceutical Technology and Pharmaceutical Technology Europe
and other industry experts review manuscripts on technical and
regulatory topics. The review process is double-blind. Manuscripts
are reviewed on a rolling basis.
Our single-themed issues, which include literature reviews and
tutorials, address excipients and ingredients, analytical testing,
outsourcing, solid dosage and more.
Pharmaceutical Knowledge
Management: Experiences
in Drug Development
and Manufacturing
Marco Adami and Alessandro Regola
K
Knowledge management nowledge management has always been a key factor for the
has gained increasing successful development and manufacture of pharmaceu-
importance in the tical products. Understanding the chemical and physical
pharmaceutical industry
over the past 10–15 years processes underlying material interactions in dosage forms
formulation, production processes, and product storage along its shelf-life
is fundamental in assuring quality, efficacy, and safety of medicinal prod-
ucts. Knowledge has always directed the design of dosage forms (e.g., in
terms of selection of excipients and primary packaging materials) and the
development of production processes (e.g., in terms of process technology
applied and process controls implemented).
Knowledge is normally assumed to be a combination of education and
experience. Advanced education on chemistry, physics, microbiology, biol-
ogy, analytics, materials properties, process technology, pharmacokinetics,
pharmacology, toxicology, and physiology must be available in the phar-
Alessandro Regola,*
a.regola@libero.it, is the AFI maceutical industry. Nowadays this ‘traditional’ form of education has to
vice president in Milan and
be integrated with a decent knowledge of information technology, data
coordinator of the AFI Quality
Section, and Marco Adami is management, and processing. In addition, highly innovative and special-
an AFI member in Milan and
ized areas, like biotech or advanced therapy, require specific knowledge
coordinator of the Validation
WRIGHTSTUDIO - STOCK.ADOBE.COM
Group within the AFI Quality of biochemistry, genomics, and cell engineering.
Section. They both serve as
To be successful in the pharmaceutical industry, scientific knowledge
pharmaceutical consultants in
quality systems and research must be supported by skills in other areas such as project management,
and development, respectively.
risk analysis, budgeting and cost controlling, and regulatory affairs.
*To whom all correspondence Given the large and different number of fields of knowledge required
should be addressed.
to develop and manufacture medicinal products, it goes without say-
58 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
Sign up for our
eNewsletters
Get the latest news, research, and trends in the pharmaceutical
industry delivered straight to your inbox by signing up.
ePT
Critical information on industry trends, new technologies, the
regulatory arena, recent contract awards, company mergers and
acquisitions, and news of interest to a highly desired community
of pharmaceutical development and manufacturing professionals.
First Look
Previews the latest issue of Pharmaceutical Technology with
links to online content and the digital edition of the magazine.
In the Lab
Articles and timely insights on the vital research and quality
functions performed in bio/pharmaceutical laboratories.
Subscribe at PharmTech.com
Quality
ing that these activities are mostly team based, and Figure 1. The scale of knowledge.
the necessary knowledge must be efficiently made
available and shared between the different people
within the team to ensure success.
All the above-mentioned considerations are in-
cluded in the International Council for Harmonisa-
tion (ICH) Q10 guideline on Pharmaceutical Quality
System (1). In chapter 1.6.1, knowledge management
is described as follows:
“Product and process knowledge should be man- As an example, when the ICH Q10 guideline
aged from development through the commercial
life of the product up to and including product dis- defines the goal of technology transfer activities,
continuation. For example, development activities the term knowledge rather than information is ap-
using scientific approaches provide knowledge for
product and process understanding. Knowledge propriately used:
management is a systematic approach to acquiring, “[…] the goal of technology transfer activities is
analysing, storing and disseminating information to transfer product and process knowledge between
related to products, manufacturing processes and development and manufacturing, and within or
components. Sources of knowledge include, but are between manufacturing sites to achieve product
not limited to prior knowledge (public domain or realization” (1).
internally documented); pharmaceutical develop-
ment studies; technology transfer activities; process
validation studies over the product lifecycle; manu-
facturing experience; innovation; continual im- Types of knowledge in
provement; and change management activities” (1). the pharmaceutical industry
Several types of knowledge can be identified in the
Types of knowledge pharmaceutical industry.
To be efficient, any organization should not only Product/process and quality system knowledge. Knowl-
process information but also create information edge related to product/process is of a scientific–tech-
and knowledge. Though often used interchangeably, nical nature, is typically developed and gained during
knowledge and information are not the same thing. product and process development, and is captured and
Knowledge is neither data nor information, though maintained in technical documentation such as quality
it is related to both (2). All organizations need data, specifications, manufacturing methods, qualification,
but data give only a partial description of a situation, and validation reports. This type of knowledge is typi-
though it is important because it is the ‘raw material’ cally transferred from development functions to man-
which, after contextualization, creates information. ufacturing departments during scale-up and indus-
FIGURES COURTESY OF THE AUTHORS
In the same way, information is a flow of messages trialization steps of product lifecycle. It might also be
that, after using logical deductions and consolida- transferred from one manufacturing site to the other
tion, becomes knowledge. Knowledge develops over during technology transfers in the marketing phase of
time, through experience. At last, expertise is the the product. Product/process knowledge typically in-
efficient use of knowledge. The hierarchy is graphi- creases rapidly during development to reach a plateau
cally expressed in Figure 1. in the commercial phase; however, during the lifecycle
60 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
of product ‘quantum leap’ increases of knowledge may This is quite evident in development activities where,
occur typically originating by changes in technology by definition, knowledge about products and processes
or by trouble-shooting activities due to manufactur- builds up by following standard company develop-
ing problems. It is of utmost importance that these ment procedures. The quality-by-design (QbD) ap-
increases in product/process knowledge are captured proach in development activities facilitates and further
and consolidated in company documentation. strengthens knowledge build up and capture in this
Quality system-related knowledge is more in line crucial phase of product lifecycle.
with good practice (GxP) guidelines—regulatory in The importance of the knowledge gained during
nature and typically developed through adaptation pharmaceutical development activities is empha-
to changing laws and guidelines, self-assessments, au- sized in ICH’s Q8 guideline (3). It is in pharma-
thority inspections, and deficiency letters. This type of ceutical development that the knowledge is created
knowledge is usually kept and maintained in policies, leading to product and process understanding and
procedures, and manuals, and is less impacted by the product realization after transfer to the manufactur-
type of products manufactured and the field of activ- ing site. A pharmaceutical development department
ity of the company than the product/process related plays a central role in the development phase of a
knowledge. Several quality system elements (e.g., how product, not only from the technical point of view
to manage complaints or changes) are independent but also due to collaborative interactions with most
of the technology in place for manufacturing. Being of the company functions, as illustrated in Figure 2.
related to regulatory aspects, this type of know-how This is a unique opportunity for people to gain
is usually impacted by the regulatory classification knowledge and grow professionally. In view of the
of products (prescription vs. over-the-counter [OTC], inherent complexity of product development, it is
generic vs. proprietary, biotech vs. small molecule vs. evident that empiricism or personal initiative would
advanced medicinal therapy product [ATMP]), and by never allow these goals to be achieved. There must
the reference market (worldwide vs. local). be an integrated knowledge management system.
Internal vs. external knowledge. Another way to classify One example of internally developed knowledge
knowledge is its origin. We can distinguish between during manufacturing is process validation. By per-
knowledge internally developed in the company from forming this exercise, companies develop significant
the one gained by means of external contacts and re- information about the impact of material attributes
lationships. The classification is not of minor impor- and process parameters on product quality. This is
tance as it impacts significantly on the methods neces- the case in both prospective validation and ongoing
sary to capture and consolidate the know-how. process verification. The knowledge gathered is usually
Internally developed knowledge originates from captured in process validation reports.
routine activities performed according to company Another opportunity to internally develop knowl-
procedures. Despite being standard processes, these edge on products and processes is the management
activities always generate new information on pro- of nonconformities. Deviations in the manufactur-
cesses and products. In this case, knowledge develops ing process or in the stability profile of some batches
and increases in the frame of standardized process. trigger investigations, which result in an increased
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 61
Quality
Figure 2. Collaboration is at the heart of pharmaceutical development. Blue and yellow circles outline intra-
Figure 2. Collaboration is at the heart of pharmaceutical development. Blue and yellow circles outline intra-pharmaceutical development
pharmaceutical development interactions and inter functions interactions, respectively. ADME is absorption,
interactions and inter functions interactions, respectively. ADME is absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion; QA is quality
distribution, metabolism,
assurance; andand
R&D is research excretion; QA is quality assurance; R&D is research and development.
development.
QA
Corporate
ADME Operations
Toxicology
Marketing
QA
Pre-
formulation R&D
Discovery Formulation
development
Clinical
supply
Analytical
development
Stability
Clinical
team
Regulatory
affairs Documentation
knowledge about the interaction between material at- or from low-shear mixing to high-shear homogeniza-
tributes and process parameters with product quality tion in creams manufacturing. All these cases, while
attributes. For instance, unexpected results might be potentially negatively affecting product quality or sta-
observed when changes in raw material quality are bility, lead to an increased understanding of products
implemented, even within the approved specifica- and related processes and are typically captured in the
tions. For example, slight changes in the particle size adaptation of materials specifications or manufactur-
of excipients may impact the compression behavior of ing methods, in other words, in the revision of critical
a dry mix for direct compression or slightly increased materials attributes and critical process parameters.
amounts of peroxides in raw materials may lead to Knowledge is frequently acquired externally. This
significant variations in the degradation rate of the is the case, for instance, of attendance to courses,
active ingredient in the formulation. Also, changes in meetings, and symposia organized by academic,
production technology, usually made to improve not professional, industry, or health authorities, orga-
only productivity but quality reproducibility as well, nizations, or associations. Other opportunities to
can lead to an unexpected adverse impact on product gain new information and understanding of prod-
quality. This may happen, for example, when moving ucts and processes are the interaction with materials,
from conventional granulation to high-speed or fluid- equipment, or instrument suppliers, with providers
bed granulation in solid oral dosage forms production of special good manufacturing practice (GMP) ser-
62 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
vices (e.g., in the area of qualification and validation for regulators in the manufacture of medicinal prod-
or analytical testing) and with external subject matter ucts. For example, this topic was not mentioned at all
experts and consultants. Self-training on scientific in the 2001 version of the European Union (EU) GMP
and technological literature and on new or revised Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation), while the
guidelines issued by professional/industry asso- term ‘knowledge’ is reported several times in the 2015
ciations or by authorities may also be regarded as a current version (8), which also includes a definition of
source of external acquisition of knowledge. Partici- knowledge management in its glossary section. Other
pation in interest or discussion groups in professional guidelines, such as ICH Q8 (Pharmaceutical Develop-
and industry associations on specific topics is another ment) and ICH Q9 (Quality Risk Management) (3,9)
route to gain externally acquired knowledge. emphasize the concept of scientific knowledge. This
Externally acquired knowledge is typically more alignment between knowledge and science is referred
difficult to capture in the company quality system to the explicit knowledge, while the concept of tacit
because it needs to be stored/retrieved/changed dif- knowledge is a bit lacking. Also, there are no doubts
ferently from the knowledge acquired over the years that the highly regulated environment of the pharma-
by a company formulation scientist or a manufactur- ceutical industry has traditionally given higher value
ing engineer. However, quantum leaps in company to the explicit knowledge (in its standard operating
know-how are often obtained through external ex- procedures [SOPs], reports, specifications, best prac-
perience and competence. tices, training, etc.). From this perspective, ICH Q10
Categorization of knowledge. Many authors have dealt is the turning point as it not only refers to the ‘infor-
with the process of knowledge creation. Knowledge mation’, which is explicit knowledge-related, but also
has been classified into various categories; for exam- emphasizes concepts such as ‘product and process un-
ple it has been categorized as explicit, implicit, or tacit, derstanding’, ‘manufacturing experience’, ‘innovation’,
while other authors refer to implicit, explicit, proce- ‘continual improvement’, and ‘change management ac-
dural, declarative, or strategic knowledge. However, tivities’, which are clearly tacit knowledge-related.
this is not the goal of this paper and the reader is re- Both types of knowledge, explicit and tacit, are
ferred to the literature on the subject (2,4–7). Distinc- required for a project to be successful. However, ac-
tion between tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge is cording to the so-called 80/20 rule of knowledge (7),
commonly found in many publications. Although sim- the majority (approximately 80%) of knowledge is
plistic, this classification is very useful for the purpose tacit, and therefore linked to experience and exper-
of this paper. In simple terms, ‘explicit’ is transmittable tise, while only 20% is explicit, and therefore easily
knowledge while ‘tacit’ is what is in everyone’s head. documented. It is recognized that the latter usually
Explicit knowledge is easily documented and captured solves approximately 80% of the problems, while the
for example in protocols, reports, procedures, and so former typically solves about 20% of the higher-grade
on. Tacit knowledge is person-related and, therefore, is problems. Knowledge management is key to ensure
hard to formalize and transfer. knowledge flow within organizations.
There are no doubts that between 2001 and 2015 For example, let us assume that we are dealing with
knowledge management became an important topic the formulation of a low-dose direct compression tab-
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 63
Quality
let. Typically, a pre-blending of the active ingredient quite easy to update a raw material quality specifica-
with an excipient is used to ensure good uniformity tion, justify it, and make the information available to
of the final mixture. In this case, technical discus- all involved personnel, it might be more difficult to
sions with manufacturers/suppliers of excipients can record and trace all the steps and the processes that
be extremely useful, not only for the selection of the led the company to the change. Additionally, that
most appropriate grade of a given excipient but also for change would likely be treated individually with-
process optimization. Aspects such as previous experi- out any correlation with other similar or connected
ence and thorough practical knowledge of the material changes implemented on the same or other materi-
characteristics usually play a key role in making the als. For instance, the change in specification for per-
best decision. But this type of knowledge is something oxide content of a raw material could originate from
that is not easily retrievable in textbooks and can be a deviation or non-conformity experienced in batch
considered as a typical example of tacit knowledge, manufacturing, be the outcome of lengthy and com-
which can be converted to explicit thanks to interac- plex investigations, and be applicable to some for-
tions between people. Also, it is believed that this ex- mulations and not to others. It is difficult to assure
ample clarifies the difference between information and that the traceability of the development of this type
knowledge and highlights a key aspect of knowledge of knowledge increases for all products managed by
that it is related to human actions. a company and all over a long period of time. Prod-
uct quality reviews/annual product reviews partially
Knowledge documentation fulfill these requirements. They include all changes,
The easiest way to capture knowledge and to make it deviations, complaints, and quality events impact-
available to all potential beneficiaries is its incorpo- ing a product; however, they do normally cover a
ration into the quality system documentation imple- 12-month period and are limited to one product
mented in the company. New information, data, and only. In addition, their contents are strictly defined
results can be included, as applicable and appropri- by correspondent regulations (EU GMP or US 21
ate, in procedures, working instructions, methods, Code of Federal Regulations) and not always suitable
specifications, reports, and so on. The advantage of to capture all knowledge collected on the product
this system is that knowledge is consolidated in the and process during the period covered.
company and that the necessary information and The ideal document to collect and update the
training of all appropriate personnel is already or- knowledge gained must be designed to cover the
ganized according to company procedures and pro- entire lifecycle of a product and related processes,
cesses. Good examples would be a new analytical from the early formulation studies until the termi-
method or a new tool for risk analysis, which would nation of commercial manufacturing. The docu-
be respectively included in new versions of analytical ment could be defined as the ‘product lifecycle file’
methods or risk management procedures. and could be organized by topics (e.g., raw ma-
Unfortunately, this system is not applicable to and terials, packaging materials, production process,
not suitable for all types of new knowledge made analytical methods, analytical specifications).
available at the company. For instance, while it is Each topic (and subtopic) could describe all the
64 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
change history, with interconnection with other incremental innovation. This innovation testifies
topics for the same or other products. Of course, to increases of knowledge typically associated with
reference to quality system documentation could the concept of continual improvement throughout
be used to avoid unnecessary repetitions. For in- the life cycle of a product. Whereas, continuous
stance, using the above-mentioned example of the manufacturing or process analytical technology
change in specification for the peroxide content belong to the category of radical innovation.
of an excipient, this change could be traced in the Based on the authors’ experience, knowledge
section dedicated to raw materials and referenced management can promote innovation according to
to both the deviation report, which includes all the following drivers:
the investigations bringing to the change, and the • Knowledge management creates an open and
file managing the corresponding supplier change. transparent system favoring relationship build-
Reference could also be made to all other impacted ing and people interactions. This means acquir-
products and processes, if any. ing knowledge through collaboration which, in
turn, is a way to innovation.
Knowledge management and innovation • In current market scenario of intense competi-
In today’s complex pharmaceutical business world, tion, the industry is being forced to innovate
quality and innovation are the drivers for profit- to maintain this success. Innovation is strictly
able revenue growth and long-term sustainability. dependent on the availability of knowledge
Now more than ever, partnership and collabora- and has become increasingly complex. There-
tion are essential to advance drug delivery innova- fore, this complexity can be managed by
tion. There are several definitions of innovation in knowledge management.
the literature, but the ones that best clarify the role • Knowledge management favors the integration of
of knowledge management in innovation are those internal and external knowledge, thus making it
that look at innovation as a process of knowledge. more easily accessible and helping the conversion
Simply stated, innovation is the creation of new from tacit to explicit knowledge.
knowledge, and this could in turn result in changes • Knowledge management favors collaboration,
in the organization’s knowledge system (5,10–11). which means that knowledge can be shared and
Interestingly, in some of these papers, a distinction enriched. The skills acquired through collabora-
is made between radical and incremental innova- tion make innovative solutions more easily avail-
tion. The former is a sort of line extension of an ex- able, and this is particularly important in the de-
isting product, while the latter involves the applica- velopment of a new product and in fields where
tion of new technologies. Incremental innovation there is relatively little explicit knowledge, such as
is more tactical while radical innovation is key to gene therapy or cell therapy.
long-term success. Thinking of the pharmaceutical
world, the improvements that typically occur in Knowledge dissemination
technology transfer activities and/or in the man- An effective dissemination system has to be imple-
ufacturing phase of a product are an example of mented in the company to avoid knowledge loss
Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 65
Quality
and dispersion. One simple way to disseminate nated to all potentially interested people in the
knowledge is through a training program, which company (e.g., by means of emails, newsletters,
each company must have in place to be GxP com- and/or regular update meetings).
pliant. It is essential that the training program Oral dissemination is also important; short
does not only reiterate the information currently briefings on new technologies, frequently associ-
available at the company or current regulatory or ated with new development projects running at the
GxP requirements but is continuously updated by company, could be organized to inform and trans-
subject matter experts. Regarding GxP require- fer knowledge to people not directly involved. Reg-
ments, it seems useful to have a regular review on ular information exchange sessions could involve
news and trends, even if not strictly related to the the attendance of different company functions and
operations ongoing at the company. For instance, departments, where each participant could pres-
a company operating in the field of non-sterile ent on ongoing projects and share experiences and
products would definitely benefit by a general knowledge gained through day-to-day activities.
training on requirements for sterile production. A The same approach could be used to disseminate
company manufacturing small molecules could information gained at external events, such as con-
get good ideas for improvement in knowing what gresses, meetings, or courses.
the requirements to produce biotech products are.
In respect of GxP regulations, it is important to Knowledge loss
establish a systematic monitoring program to be There are many situations where scientific, tech-
continually updated on new regulations and re- nological, and GxP/regulatory knowledge may
quirements, even in draft form, at least for the area be lost. Typical examples in the pharma industry
of operations. The most important organizations are subject matter experts leaving the company,
publishing norms and guidelines (e.g., European product transfer from development to commercial
Medicines Agency, US Food and Drug Adminis- production, product transfer to contract manufac-
tration, ICH, Pharmaceutical Inspection Conven- turing organizations (CMOs) or other manufac-
tion and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation turing sites, and product discontinuation. Another
Scheme, World Health Organization, European critical situation may be a company acquisition or
Pharmacopoeia, United States Pharmacopeia) as change of ownership.
well as professional and industry organizations The key issue is almost always the change in
(e.g., Parenteral Drug Association, International product/process ownership; knowledge is not al-
Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering, Associa- ways and completely transferred when responsi-
tions for Professionals in Infection Control and bility for the product/process is transferred. This
Epidemiology, International Pharmaceutical Ex- issue is common when knowledge is documented
cipients Council, International Organization for in a very fragmented way; some pieces of the
Standardization) must be continuously monitored puzzle can be lost. The puzzle’s integrity must be
for new publications. The information about new maintained during transfer. Therefore, it is recom-
requirements or trends must be timely dissemi- mended that the scientific and technological know-
66 Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, EXCIPIENTS, AND MANUFACTURING eBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m
how is consolidated as much as possible into one or product quality must be under control), or between
a few documents. One document is easier to transfer manufacturing sites to achieve product realization.
without any loss of information, compared with many However, without the implementation of a skillful
different documents belonging to different company efficient knowledge management system, allowing
areas and functions. It is of utmost importance that people to interact directly, all these aspects would
these few documents collecting the vital information bring inefficiencies which, in turn, would lead to
for our products and processes are kept updated dur- missed business opportunities.
ing the ownership change. Very often the ownership People should perceive knowledge management
change itself generates new knowledge (e.g., in tech- as a routine part of their daily work. This is a cul-
nology transfer projects); this new knowledge must tural change and cultural changes are not easy to
be included in the documentation in a timely fashion. implement, they take time. Thus, knowledge man-
Loss of knowledge due to people leaving the com- agement requires strong sponsorship first from se-
pany or retiring can be prevented with a well-orga- nior management.
nized succession planning or back-up program. These Only a small part of the huge amount of infor-
programs identify persons that can substitute in the mation created by the pharmaceutical industry is
short-, medium-, or long-term persons in charge of utilized effectively. Knowledge management helps
key positions in the company; it is important that this generate an integrated source of information. The
program not only covers hierarchical positions, as it requirement is not to convert all the tacit knowl-
is often the case, but also key subject matter experts, edge into explicit knowledge, but rather to cre-
even if not positioned high in the hierarchy. In other ate a knowledge-driven culture, which promotes
words, a ‘knowledge back-up or succession plan’ must innovation. This is vital to provide competitive
be in place and continuously updated. Successors and advantage.
back-ups should not only be trained by the subject
matter experts but should also receive organized and References
1. ICH, Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System, Current Step 4 Ver-
planned scientific and/or GxP training. sion (ICH, 2008).
2. T.H. Davenport and L. Prusak, “Working Knowledge: How
Organizations Manage What they Know,” Ubiquity, Research
Article, Aug. 1, 2000.
Conclusion 3. ICH, Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development, Current Step 4
Version (ICH, 2009).
The increased complexity of the pharmaceutical 4. I. Nonaka, Organ. Sci. 5 (1) 14-37 (1994).
5. P.V. Søberg and A. Chaudhuri, Knowl. Process Manag. 25 (2)
environment makes knowledge management an 88-96 (2018).
6. ISPE, “Knowledge Management,” a Supplement to Pharma-
essential requirement. Mergers and acquisitions ceutical Engineering (May 2014)
undoubtedly bring opportunities, but they also 7. N. Calnan, “The 80/20 Rule of Knowledge,” in Supplement to
Pharmaceutical Engineering, pp. 54–58 (May 2014).
raise challenges. Troubleshooting across a prod- 8. EC, EudraLex Volume 4, Annex 15: Qualification and Valida-
tion (Brussels, March 2015).
uct lifecycle also provides the opportunity for con- 9. ICH, Q9 Quality Risk Management, Current Step 4 Version
(2005).
tinual improvement. ICH Q10 recognizes the key 10. M. Du Plessis, J. Knowl. Manag. 11 (4) 20-29 (2007).
11. M. Gloet and M. Terziovski, J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 15 (5)
role played by the technology transfer process for 402-409 (2004). PT
Aizon.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Alfa Sigma................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49
Coating Place............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17
DPT Labs................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31
Distek..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................51
Fluid Air..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Mikart........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23
Natoli..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................11
NovaSep.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
PTI.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27
University of Iowa..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55
Veltek........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5