Q: What section of the Florida Statutes applies to commercial landlord-

tenant relationships?
A: Florida landlord tenant law is found in Florida Statutes, Chapter 83, and
consists of three parts. Part I discusses nonresidential or commercial
tenancies. Part II discusses residential tenancies and Part III discusses self-
service storage space.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.001, et seq. (2012).

  Q: What is a term for years tenancy?

A: A term for years tenancy has a certain and definite duration, meaning a
fixed term. A term for years tenancy is created by a written lease that
expresses a term that is certain as to commencement and as to specific
maximum duration. If the language of the lease contract does not express
a certain term, a tenancy at will is created.
Source: Ehrlich v. Barbatsis Holding Co., 63 So. 2d 911, 913 (Fla. 1953).

  Q:  What is a tenancy at will?

A: A tenancy at will is a tenancy with durational insecurity, meaning for no
fixed term. The term of a tenancy at will is determined by the period of
payment, and the term is automatically renewed for successive periods.
Such tenancy shall be from year to year, or quarter to quarter, or month
to month, or week to week, to be determined by the periods at which the
rent is payable. If the rent is payable weekly, then the tenancy shall be
from week to week; if payable monthly, then from month to month; if
payable quarterly, then from quarter to quarter; if payable yearly, then
from year to year. The usual rights and duties of landlord and tenant exist,
but either party may terminate the lease at any time by giving proper
notice. A tenancy created by a written instrument with an unlimited term
is considered a tenancy at will.

Source: Fla. Stat. §§ 83.01, 83.02 (2012).

  Q: What is a tenancy at sufferance?

A: A tenancy at sufferance is created by a wrongful holdover tenant. A
tenancy at sufferance is only created when there is a written instrument, a
limited term that has expired, and a holdover of possession by the tenant
without a written renewal of the lease. The mere payment or acceptance
of rent shall not be construed to be a renewal of the term, but if the
landlord gives written consent to continue a holdover, the tenancy
becomes one at will. If the parties agree to a new oral lease, there is no
tenancy at sufferance. Pursuant to Section 83.06, Florida Statutes, a
landlord may charge double rent when a tenant refuses to relinquish
possession of the premises at expiration of the term. Further, a landlord
still has the right to bring an action against a holdover tenant for the use
and occupation of the premises.

Source: Fla. Stat. §§ 83.04, 83.06, and 83.07 (2012).

  Q: Under Florida law, is an oral lease enforceable?

A: Yes, as a tenancy at will. However, Florida’s Statute of Frauds law
provides that a lease for longer than one year must be in writing to be
enforceable. Nonetheless, an oral lease that is payable monthly is a
month-to-month tenancy at will, and, thus, does not violate the Statute of
Frauds if it continues in effect for more than a year.
Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.01 (2012), Mangum v. Susser, 764 So. 2d 653, 655
(Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

  Q: What should be included in a written commercial lease?

A: First of all, a commercial lease should be written in plain and simple
language, so all persons who are associated with the lease will understand
the rights and obligations created by the lease. As to what should be
included in a written commercial lease, it should include, at a minimum,
the names of the parties, a specific description of the property, the term
of the lease, a provision for rent payment, words of mutual agreement
indicating the intent of both parties to create a lease contract, and the
signatures of the parties. Further, a lease for more than one year should
be signed in the presence of two subscribing witnesses. These witnesses
do not need to be “disinterested,” meaning the witnesses may have some
interest in the lease. For an extensive list of other subjects that should be
considered when drafting a commercial lease see §8.02, Florida
Commercial Landlord Tenant Law (Nicholas C. Glover, supplemented by
Douglas MacGregor; LexisNexis Matthew Bender).
Source: Fla. Stat. § 689.01 (2012); Skyline Outdoor Communs., Inc. v.
James, 903 So.2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

  Q: How should a corporation “sign” a lease?

A: Section 692.01, Florida Statutes provides that a corporation may
execute lease agreements by affixing the corporate seal and having it
signed by its president or any vice president or chief executive officer.
Thus, a commercial lease is void and unenforceable against the corporate
tenant if it fails in this regard, except that it may be enforceable against a
corporation if it was signed by a person with apparent authority.
Further, commercial leases must comply with the two-witness
requirement of Section 689.01, Florida Statutes.
Source: Fla. Stat. § 692.01 (2012); Radison Props., Inc. v. Flamingo Groves,
Inc., 767 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Ocean Bank of Miami v. INV-UNI
Inv. Corp., 599 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1992), rev. denied 606 So. 2d 1165
(Fla. 1992); Skylake Ins. Agency, Inc. v. NMB Plaza, LLC, 23 So. 3d 175 (Fla.
3d DCA 2009).

  Q: What is apparent authority?

A: The Florida Supreme Court stated that the principle of apparent
authority embraces the following three elements: 1) a representation by
the principal, 2) reliance on that representation by a third person, and 3) a
change of position by the third person in reliance on the representation.
Clearly, the reliance of a third party on the “apparent authority” of a
principal’s agent must be reasonable and rest in the actions of or
appearances created by the principal, and “not by agents who often
ingeniously create an appearance of authority by their own acts.”

Source: Security Union Title Ins. Co. v. Citibank (Florida), N.A., 715 So. 2d
973, 974-75 (Fla. 1st DCA) rev. dismissed, 728 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1998).

  Q: What rules should be followed in construing or interpreting a lease?

A: The general rules of contract construction apply to the construction of a
Florida commercial lease contract. A lease agreement must be construed
to give effect to the parties’ intent. Every contract provision should be
given meaning and effect and the deliberate distribution of benefits and
burdens by the parties should not be disturbed by the court. The
individual terms of a lease contract should be considered as a whole and
in relation to one another, and not in isolation. When possible, provisions
that apparently conflict should be construed so they do not conflict.
However, when two clauses of a lease are adverse to each other and
cannot stand together the first remains and the latter fails. A lease
provision that specifically addresses a subject takes precedence over a
general provision concerning that subject. The intention of the parties is to
be obtained from the unambiguous terms of the contract, not from what
may have existed in the minds of the parties but was not reflected in the
written lease. Courts will not interpret contracts in a manner that extends
or enlarges the obligations of a contracting party beyond the plain
meaning of the language used in the contract itself.

Source: Stemmler v. Moon Jewelry Co., 139 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA
1962); Jerry’s, Inc. v. Miami, 591 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Meyer v.
Caribbean Interiors, 435 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Petrou v. Wilder,
557 So. 2d 617, 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Freundlich v. Lassiter, 666 So. 2d
164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Sisco v. Rotenberg, 104 So. 2d 365, 368 (Fla.
1958); Leesburg Cmty. Cancer Ctr. v. Leesburg Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc., 972 So.
2d 203, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

  Q: Is a tenant liable for breach of contract for “going dark?”

A: Yes, in some circumstances. A tenant will be liable to the landlord for
“going dark” if the lease expressly or impliedly includes a covenant of
continuous operation. Assuming there is no such express provision in
the lease, the court must determine, based on the entirety of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the lease, whether the parties intended it to
include an implied covenant of continuous operation. Possibly the most
important factor is whether the rental to be paid is based solely on a
percentage of the sales or profits generated by the business. If the court
finds that there was no such intent, the tenant’s “going dark” will not be
deemed a breach of the lease, provided it continues to timely pay rent.
Source: Lincoln Tower Corp. v. Richter’s Jewelry Co., 12 So. 2d 452 (Fla.
1943); Mayfair Operating Corp. v. Bessemer Properties, Inc., 150 Fla. 132,
136 (Fla. 1942); Diltz v. J & M Corp., 381 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA
1980); Stemmler v. Moon Jewelry Company, Inc., 139 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st
DCA 1962); Jerrico, Inc. v. Wash. Nat’l Ins. Co., 400 So. 2d 1316, 1318 (Fla.
5th DCA 1981).

  Q:  What is a covenant of continuous operation?

A: A covenant of continuous operation is an obligation on the part of the
tenant to continue to operate the business at the leased premises. This
obligation is especially important where the rent is tied in some way to the
tenant’s business, such as being based on tenant’s gross sales or profits.
This covenant is also important in the context of anchor tenants that
generate substantial traffic to the premises, thereby increasing the sales
of the other tenants. A covenant of continuous operation is breached
when the tenant discontinues operations (“goes dark”) at the leased
premises, even though it continues to pay rent.

Source: 15 Williston on Contracts § 48:4 (4th ed.)

  Q: Describe the landlord’s duty to deliver possession of the premises.

A: The landlord has an implied duty to give possession to the tenant at the
time stated in the lease contract. In other words, the landlord is bound to
permit the tenant to take possession at the commencement of the term
and to interpose no obstacle thereto. Delivery of a lease authorizes the
tenant to take possession according to the terms of the instrument.
During the term of the lease, the tenant in possession is for all practical
purposes the owner of the property, having the right of possession,
dominion, control, and use thereof, in the absence of a statute affecting or
limiting such rights. Where the lessor fails to give possession, the lessee
may maintain an appropriate action against the lessor, such as an action
for damages or an action for possession. In the context of new
construction, an implied warranty or covenant arises that the completed
structure will be suitable for the lessee’s intended use.

Source: 52A C.J.S. Landlord & Tenant §§ 724, 731 (2012); Levitz Furniture
Co. of E. Region v. Cont’l Equities, 411 So. 2d 221, 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

  Q: What is the landlord’s  covenant of quiet enjoyment?

A: A covenant of quiet enjoyment made by the landlord assures the tenant
that the landlord’s title is not defective and that the tenant’s possession
will not be disturbed. It protects the tenants against the acts or hindrances
of the landlord. As the name suggests, it assures that the tenant shall have
legal quiet and peaceable possession and enjoyment of the leased
premises. The landlord’s duty to provide quiet enjoyment also applies to a
subtenant. A covenant of quiet enjoyment is implied in the lease, whether
written or oral. However, the parties may expressly exclude the
implication of a covenant for quiet enjoyment.

Source: 52A C.J.S. Landlord & Tenant § 768 (2012); Blum v. Kohlmeyer &
Co., 363 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

  Q: What happens if the landlord breaches the  covenant of quiet

enjoyment?
A: A tenant may bring an action for breach of the covenant of quiet
enjoyment against the landlord for interference with the use and
enjoyment of the rented property. A breach of the covenant of quiet
enjoyment may entitle the tenant to be discharged from his obligations
under the lease; the tenant no longer has to pay rent. An express
covenant of quiet enjoyment may provide that the landlord shall pay
damages to the tenant if the beneficial enjoyment of the premises is
interrupted by a failure in the landlord’s title.

Source: 52A C.J.S. Landlord & Tenant §§ 777 (2012).

  Q: Is a landlord liable for injuries occurring on the leased premises?

A: Generally, a landlord is not liable for injuries occurring on the leased
premises. However, a landlord may be liable for injuries if the condition
causing the injury is:

1. a violation of
law;
2. a pre-
existing
defect;
3. an inherent
danger; or
4. the landlord
undertakes
a covenant
to repair.
When there has been a violation of law by the landlord, not even an
exculpatory clause will insulate the landlord from liability. See John’s Pass
Seafood Co. v. Weber,  369 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969) (finding that
landlord is not permitted to exculpate himself from liability to a tenant for
fire damage which occurred as a result of the landlord’s failure to provide
firefighting equipment on leased dock).
A pre-existing defect in a structure or premises will generally lead to a
landlord’s liability for injuries to strangers that are caused by that defect.
The landlord has a duty to warn any guests of a tenant against known
dangers the licensee is not likely to discover and to refrain from wanton
negligence or willful misconduct. However, when a tenant is in complete
control of the premises and a defect comes into existence during the term
of the lease, or a dangerous condition is the direct result of the tenant’s
use of the premises, a landlord will not normally be liable for injuries to an
invitee of the tenant. See Lich v. N.C.J. Inv. Co.,728 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA
1999) (landlord was not found liable when a window that broke and
injured tenant’s employee had operated properly for one year and was
installed prior to landlord’s purchase of the building.)
A landlord who assumes a duty to repair or to improve the rented
premises is held to a standard of reasonable care in making the repairs or
improvements. A landlord will be liable for injuries caused by the
negligence of his own unskillful work or the work of his servants or
employees in making the repairs or in leaving the premises in an unsafe
condition, even if the repairs are undertaken voluntarily.

  Q: Does a landlord have a duty to protect against foreseeable criminal

activity?
A: Yes, landlords may have a duty to protect against foreseeable criminal
activity. This duty may be limited to harm occurring on premises under
the direct control of the landlord. For instance, this duty extends to
common areas within the landlord’s control.

Source: McVicker v. Kolb, 839 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 4thDCA 2003)

  Q: Can a commercial landlord protect itself from liability for its own
negligence?
A: Yes. A commercial landlord may avoid liability for its own negligence by
inserting a specific exculpatory clause, with clear terms, in the lease
contract. Exculpatory clauses that limit or exempt liability for negligence
are disfavored, but are enforceable in Florida courts.

Source: University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. Stewart, 272 So. 2d 507,

511 (Fla. 1973)

  Q: In general, what are the duties and obligations of the tenant?

A: The tenant’s primary duty is the payment of rent. The tenant also has
the duty to surrender the premises at the termination of the lease
agreement. Additionally, the tenant has a duty not to commit waste.
When the lease term begins, the tenant has the right to occupy and to use
the premises described in the lease. However, in the absence of a specific
provision or in the absence of waste, the tenant has no obligation to
occupy or use, or to continue to use the demised premises for a particular
purpose, even if both parties expected and intended a particular purpose.

  Q:  What is waste?

A: Waste is the abusive or destructive use of property by someone who is
in rightful possession of the property. Waste implies neglect or
misconduct that results in material damage but does not include the
ordinary depreciation of property from time and normal use. Implicit in
the landlord-tenant relationship is the obligation on the part of the tenant
not to commit waste to the leased premises.

Source: Black’s Law Dictionary 1425 (5th ed. 1979); Stegeman v. Burger

Chef Sys., Inc., 374 So. 2d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

  Q: What are the landlord’s remedies when a tenant has

committed  waste  to the premises?
A: When a landlord is confronted with a tenant’s present act of waste, the
landlord may seek an injunction to restrain the tenant from committing
further waste. After waste has been committed by the tenant, a landlord
may bring an action in damages for waste committed by the tenant that
caused injury to the landlord’s future interest in the property.

Source: Rogers v. Martin, 87 Fla. 204, 208 (Fla. 1924); Stephenson v.

National Bank of Winter Haven, 92 Fla. 347, 353 (Fla. 1926).

  Q: What are the landlord’s remedies when the tenant has held over
after the expiration of the term of the lease?
A: When a tenant holds over beyond the term of his tenancy, the landlord
has the following legal remedies: (1) demanding double rent; (2)
demanding a specific amount of continuing rent; or (3) initiating a removal
action, i.e. suing for the possession of the property plus damages,
including special damages for loss of the property’s use.

Source: Lincoln Oldsmobile v. Branch, 574 So. 2d 1111, 1113 (Fla. 2nd DCA
1990); Fla. Stat. §§ 83.20-83.251 (2012).

  Q: May a landlord demand double rent from a tenant who holds over
after the end of the term?
A: Yes. The landlord has the statutory right to demand double rent at the
end of the month, or in the same proportion for a longer or shorter time
by distress, from a tenant who holds over willfully and without title after
the end of the term. However, a tenant is probably not liable for double
rent if he holds over with a reasonable good faith claim of a right to
possession. The statute should be construed in favor of tenant and
against the landlord. For this reason, the obligation to pay double rent has
been held to begin on the day of the demand and is not retroactive to the
date of the holdover. In order for a landlord to collect double rent as
authorized by Florida Statute Section 83.06, the landlord must first give
notice to the tenant of his intention to demand double rent. For example,
the term of a lease ended on March 31, but the tenant continued their
possession of the property. The landlord demanded double rent on April
30. Assuming the landlord gave the tenant notice of his intention to
demand double rent, the day that double rent is calculated is April 30, the
day of the demand.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.06 (2012); Greentree Amusement Arcade v.

Greenacres Dev. Corp., 401 So. 2d 915, 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Painter v.
Groveland, 79 So. 2d 765, 768 (Fla. 1955); Lincoln Oldsmobile v. Branch,
574 So. 2d 1111, 1113 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990).

  Q: Is “self-help” entry allowed by the landlord in an eviction action?

A: No, in most circumstances. In 1983, the Florida Legislature made
substantial changes to Florida Statutes Section 83.05, taking away the
landlord’s right to immediate re-entry and possession, following a tenant’s
rent default. Now, Section 83.05, Florida Statutes, only provides that the
landlord shall recover possession of the rented premises only (1) under
Section 83.20 (discussing holdover without permission; holdover after
default, and; holdover after failing to cure a material breach) or other civil
possessory action, (2) when the tenant surrenders possession of the
rented premises to the landlord, or (3) when the tenant abandons the
rented premises.

Source: Fla. Stat. §§ 83.05 and 83.20 (2012).

  Q: When may a tenant bring an action for wrongful eviction?

A: An action for wrongful eviction is proper when a landlord’s wrongful act
deprives a tenant of possession of the rented premises or disturbs a
tenant’s beneficial enjoyment so as to cause the tenant to abandon the
premises. A wrongful eviction may be either actual or constructive.
Generally, the tenant must abandon the premises in order to sue the
landlord for wrongful eviction.
Source: Richards v. Dodge, 150 So. 2d 477, 481 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1963).

  Q:  What is a constructive eviction?

A: A constructive eviction results from the intended disturbance by the
landlord or his agent that interferes with the tenant’s possession and
either renders the premises unfit for the purpose rented, or deprives the
tenant of his beneficial enjoyment of the premises. Eviction may occur
from a landlord’s direct act of interference, from an interference with the
tenant’s access to the rented premises, or from a third party’s
interference. A constructive eviction has the effect of essentially depriving
the tenant of the beneficial enjoyment of the leased premises as where
they are rendered unsafe, unfit, or unsuitable for occupancy in whole or in
substantial part for the purposes for which leased.

Source: Ralston, Inc. v. Miller, 357 So. 2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

  Q: Does a tenant have recourse against a landlord that removes the

tenant without legal process?
A: Possibly. If the landlord takes possession from the tenant without legal
process, the tenant may bring an action for unlawful entry and detainer. It
is irrelevant to such action that the tenant’s possession was wrongful. The
action is designed to compel the party claiming rightful possession to use
legal channels in lieu of self-help measures.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 82.01, et seq (2012).

  Q: What type of written notice is required to be served by the landlord

prior to bringing a removal action?
A: No notice is required where tenant holds over and continues in the
possession of the demised premises, or any part thereof, after the
expiration of the lease term, without the permission of the landlord. Three
days’ notice is required for a tenant that defaults in the payment of rent.
Fifteen days’ notice is required for a tenant that materially breaches the
lease or oral agreement, other than nonpayment of rent.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.20 (2012).

  Q: What is “summary procedure” in the context of a removal action?

A: A removal action is summary in nature. The purpose of a removal
action is to give the landlord fast relief when the tenant is in default under
the rent provisions of the contract. Florida landlord and tenant law entitles
the landlord to summary procedure under Florida Statutes Chapter 51. A
summary removal complaint must contain the matters required by the
removal statute: Florida Statutes, Section 51.011(1). The summary removal
complaint should be filed in the county court where the premises is
located. The tenant must answer the complaint within five days after
receiving service of process, excluding any intervening Saturdays or
Sundays, or legal holidays. Generally, default is improper when a party has
filed a responsive pleading or otherwise defended before entry of default.
All defenses of law or fact must be contained in the tenant’s answer. The
tenant may incorporate a counterclaim into his answer, thereby requiring
the landlord to serve an answer to the counterclaim within five days of
receiving service of the tenant’s answer. No other pleadings are permitted
in summary procedure.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.21 (2012); Fla. Stat. § 51.011(1) (2012); Fla. R. Civ. P.
1.090(a).

  Q: If a tenant is wrongfully evicted may he or she sue for damages, and,

if so, how are they measured?
A: Yes, for general damages and sometimes for lost profits, relocation
expenses, and punitive damages. General damages are usually
determined by finding the difference, if any, between the market value of
the remainder of the term and the rent value of the remainder of the
term. The tenant may also be entitled to lost profits and relocation
expenses if the tenant is unable to find a comparable location to rent
within the immediate area for the same rental amount. When a landlord’s
wrongful eviction ends a tenant’s business, the tenant may recover
damages that include compensation for injury to business, including a loss
of future profits if future profits can be ascertained within a reasonable
degree of certainty. Punitive damages may be claimed if the landlord’s
behavior that causes the eviction is malicious and wanton in nature, or
constitutes fraud, gross negligence or oppression.

Source: Ardell v. Milner, 166 So. 2d 714, 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Young v.

Cobbs, 83 So. 2d 417, 420 (Fla. 1955).

  Q: Is the tenant required to pay rent into the court registry in a removal
action?
A: Yes. Section 83.232, Florida Statutes, requires that in any removal
action, the tenant must pay into the court registry the amount alleged in
the complaint and any rent accrued during the pendency of the action,
unless the tenant has interposed a defense of payment or satisfaction of
the rent in the amount the complaint alleges as unpaid. The court, on its
own motion, shall notify the tenant of the requirement that rent be paid
into the court registry by order, which shall be issued immediately upon
filing of the tenant’s initial pleading, motion, or other paper. The filing of a
counterclaim for money damages does not relieve the tenant from
depositing rent due into the registry of the court. If the landlord is in
actual danger of loss of the premises or other hardship resulting from the
loss of rental income from the premises, the landlord may apply to the
court for disbursement of all or part of the funds so held in the court
registry.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.232 (2012).

  Q: What if the tenant contests the amount that is due to be paid into
the court registry?
A: If the tenant contests the amount that is due to be paid into the court
registry, the tenant must pay the amount determined by the court.
Generally, the landlord must prove the amount the amount that is due.
The court will issue an order for the defendant to pay a certain amount
due.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.232 (2012).

  Q: What if the tenant does not or cannot pay rent into the court registry
in a removal action?
A: A tenant’s failure to pay rent into the court registry is cause for
immediate default in favor of the landlord. Section 83.232, Florida
Statutes, provides that “failure of the tenant to pay the rent into the court
registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed an absolute waiver of
the tenant’s defenses. In such case, the landlord is entitled to an
immediate default for possession without further notice or hearing
thereon.” The clear language of the statute precludes any procedure in
which a trial court may excuse non-compliance with a prior order.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.232 (2012).

  Q:  What is the landlord’s lien for rent?

A: Section 83.08, Florida Statutes, provides that a landlord has a lien for
unpaid rent upon the tenant’s personal property. The lien is upon all
agricultural products raised on the rented property, upon all other
property of the tenant “usually kept on the premises,” and upon “all other
property” of the tenant. Certain property of the tenant is exempt from
distress and sale to enforce the landlord’s lien for rent. Exempt property
in the commercial setting includes “beds, bedclothes and wearing
apparel.”

Source: Fla. Stat. §§ 83.08 and 83.09 (2012).

  Q: How is the  landlord’s lien for rent  enforced?
A: Enforcing the landlord’s lien for rent begins with filing a distress for
rent complaint, which initiates a distress for rent proceeding. Distress
proceedings are summary in nature and informal. A distress writ shall be
issued by a judge of the court which has jurisdiction of the amount
claimed. The remedy of distress for rent only applies to commercial
tenancies, and is abolished with regard to residential tenancies.
Source: Fla. Stat. §§ 83.11, 83.12, and 713.691 (2012).

  Q:  What’s included in a distress for rent complaint, and where is it filed?
A: The distress for rent complaint must be verified, and it must state the
name of the tenant and his relation to the landlord, facts showing how the
rent obligation arose, the amount or quality and value of the rent due, and
whether the rent is payable in money, farm products or another form of
consideration. It must be filed in the court that has jurisdiction for the
amount claimed in the county where the leased premise is located.

Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.11 (2012).

  Q: What is a  distress bond?

A: Before a judge can issue a distress writ the landlord must file a bond
with surety to be approved by the court clerk, and payable to the tenant in
at least double the amount demanded; or, if property, in double the value
of the property sought to be levied on. The bond should be conditioned to
pay all costs and damages which the tenant sustains if the landlord
institutes an improper distress proceeding.
Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.12 (2012).

  Q: What is a  distress writ?

A: A distress writ is issued by the judge in a distress for rent proceeding,
once the landlord files its distress for rent complaint and distress bond.
The writ enjoins the tenant from damaging, disposing of, secreting or
removing from the leased premises any property subject to the distress
writ, from the time the distress writ is served to the tenant until the sheriff
levies on the property, the writ is vacated or the court orders otherwise. A
tenant may be punished with contempt of court if he violates the distress
writ. If the tenant does not file a motion for the dissolution of the distress
writ under Section 83.15, Florida Statutes, before the time for answering
the complaint has expired, the sheriff shall seize the property liable to
distress.
Source: Fla. Stat. § 83.12 (2012).

Information and Source reference for this webpage is courtesy of Florida

Commercial Landlord Tenant Law (Nicholas C. Glover, supplemented by
Douglas MacGregor; LexisNexis Matthew Bender) and Florida Statutes Chapter
83.