Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GS00320 Exam 200082314
GS00320 Exam 200082314
Learning Experience
Nuclear Weapons
India and Pakistan (which most likely have nuclear weapons) cannot
obtain the legitimate status of nuclear powers in terms of international
law. The fact is that to join the 'club' you need not the consent of its
current members, but a time machine. All countries that had time to
conduct nuclear tests before 1 January 1967 automatically became
Nuclear Powers. (UNI.LU, 2021) The chronology is this: the Americans -
in 1945, Russia - four years later, the British with the French - in 1952
and 1960, respectively. In the "last car" jumped China - 1964. (Early,
2016)
Wannabe Powers
Note that this state of affairs, in some part of the non-nuclear peoples,
has always caused and still causes a sense of indignation. Nevertheless,
185 countries around the world have adopted these rules of the game
and signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. (Durkalec, 2018). This
means that the door to the elite nuclear establishment is closed forever.
The situation is paradoxical: any country that does not recognize the
Treaty formally has all the rights to establish its nuclear charge. The
members of the Treaty are also free to withdraw from it at any moment -
they only need to warn the rest of us in 90 days. (UN, 2017). Of course,
the potential bomb holder will have to make serious material costs, carry
out all sorts of international sanctions and perhaps even survive a
military attack. Nevertheless, particularly stubborn countries can still
become owners of the coveted bomb. 40 nations of the world today,
figuratively speaking, are on the verge: that is, they can produce national
nuclear weapons (NTI, 2021). But only four dared to cross that
threshold. In addition to those mentioned; Israel, India and Pakistan,
North Korea. These countries consider themselves Nuclear Powers.
2
GS00320_Exam_200082314
Learning Experience
Number of Warheads
3
GS00320_Exam_200082314
Learning Experience
Many States, Scholars, political and public figures and, above all,
experts in weapons of mass destruction, believe that today the question
should be raised. The question is not only about preventing the
proliferation of nuclear weapons, but on the complete elimination of
nuclear arsenals. Although no one in theory objects, nuclear-weapon
states, such as Russia, oppose "rapid and simplistic measures". Both
Russia, France, Great Britain and the United States - not always
agreeing with each other, say with one voice that it is premature to talk
about the elimination of nuclear weapons today. “Even proposals for
multilateral nuclear disarmament are often rejected on the grounds that
other parties cannot be trusted and are likely to cheat, or that nuclear
weapons cannot be dis-invented.” (Dungen, 2016). This is due to the
unpredictable environment of the world, for example, if North Korea have
nuclear weapons, and the rest of the world were to abolish them, a
4
GS00320_Exam_200082314
Learning Experience
5
GS00320_Exam_200082314
Learning Experience
References
Babiarz, R., 2015. The People's Nuclear Weapon: Strategic Culture and
the Development of China's Nuclear Weapons Program. Comparative
Strategy, 34(5), pp.422-446.
CVCE.EU by UNI.LU. 2021. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear
Weapons (1 July 1968). [online] Available at:
<https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/treaty_on_the_non_proliferation_of_nucle
ar_weapons_1_july_1968-en-0c1e0636-a043-4982-a8b5-
0484c27a1747.html> [Accessed 9 May 2021].
Durkalec, J., 2018. NATO Review - The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty at
fifty: a midlife crisis. [online] NATO Review. Available at:
<https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2018/06/29/the-nuclear-non-
proliferation-treaty-at-fifty-a-midlife-crisis/index.html> [Accessed 9 May
2021].
Early, N., 2016. This Is When The World's Nations Got Their Nuclear
Weapons. [online] HuffPost UK. Available at:
<https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuclear-weapons-
timeline_n_6986204> [Accessed 9 May 2021].
Fetter, S., Garwin, R. and von Hippel, F., 2018. Nuclear weapons dangers
and policy options. Physics Today, 71(4), pp.32-39.
Kristensen, H. and Korda, M., 2021. Status of World Nuclear Forces.
[online] Federation Of American Scientists. Available at:
<https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/>
[Accessed 9 May 2021].
Mills, C., 2020. Nuclear weapons at a glance: Israel. Briefing paper, (9075).
Nti.org. 2021. More Than 40 Countries Could Have Nuclear Weapons
Know-How, IAEA Chief ElBaradei Warns | Analysis | NTI. [online]
Available at: <https://www.nti.org/gsn/article/more-than-40-countries-
could-have-nuclear-weapons-know-how-iaea-chief-elbaradei-warns/>
[Accessed 9 May 2021].
UN, 2017. [online] Un.org. Available at:
<https://www.un.org/disarmament/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/tpnw-
info-kit-v2.pdf> [Accessed 9 May 2021].
van den Dungen, P., 2016. Abolishing Nuclear Weapons through Anti–
Atomic Bomb Museums. Peace Review, 28(3), pp.326-333.
6
GS00320_Exam_200082314
Learning Experience