Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Behaviour and Calculations of CFST
Behaviour and Calculations of CFST
*
Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
**
College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China
Abstract
This paper briefly summarises some recent research outcomes of concrete-filled double skin steel tubes (CFDST). The
design approach and behaviour of CFDST members presented by the authors and their collaborators are briefly
introduced. The topics covered in this paper include members subjected to static and dynamic loading, effects of long-
term loading, fire performance and residual strength after exposure to fire. Future research needs are identified.
Keywords: Concrete-filled double skin steel tubes (CFDST), behaviour, design, static, long-term, cyclic, fire
1. Introduction
CFDST (Concrete-filled double skin steel tube) is a new Outer steel
Outer steel tube Inner steel tube
type of composite construction, which consists of two Sandwiched tube
concentric steel tubes with concrete sandwiched between concrete
them. CFDST members combine the advantages of the to
ti to
Di
ti
Di
well-known concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) and the
conventional hollow reinforced concrete (RC) columns.
Inner steel
Thus, CFDST columns have a series of advantages, such tube Do Sandwiched Bo
as high strength and bending stiffness, good seismic and concrete
fire performance, and favorable construction ability. (a) Circular (b) Square
Figure 1 (a), (b) and (c) shows three typical profiles of
the CFDST sections (designated as circular, square and Outer steel Inner steel
rectangular CFDST respectively in this paper), where Bo tube tube
is the width of outer square or rectangular steel tube, Bi is
the width of inner rectangular steel tube, Do is the
diameter of outer circular steel tube or the depth of outer to ti
Do
Di
axial load (N) versus axial strain (ε) relations for typical
(χ=0), except for that the member with a hollow ratio (χ)
changing trend as that of the conventional CFST column
0.75 or smaller.
2000
χ=0.28 χ=0.51
(a) Circular (b) Square (c) Rectangular 1500
N (kN)
Aso ⋅ f yo
are defined in Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively. 0 10000 20000 30000
ξ= ε (με)
Ac, nominal ⋅ f ck
(1)
in which Aso is the cross-sectional area of the outer steel Figure 4. Effect of hollow ratio (χ) on N-ε relations
tube, Ac,nominal is the nominal cross-sectional area of the
concrete, and is equal to the hollow area inside the outer Apart from the experimental investigations, theoretical
steel tube, fyo is the yield strength of the outer steel tube,
models were also established to investigate the behaviour
of CFDSTs (Tao et al., 2004; Han et al., 2004; Tao and (2) Flexural strength
Yu, 2006). The flexural strength of CFDST (Mu) can be expressed as
N u,cr = ϕ ⋅ N u
predicted by the fibre-based model. However, more reduction factor (Tao and Yu, 2006), i.e.,
accurate predictions can be achieved using the FE (7)
modelling when the section slenderness ratio or the where φ is the stability reduction factor and can be
hollow ratio is relatively large. This is due to the fact that determined by Eq. (8).
⎧1.0 (λ ≤ λo )
⎪
the FE model could simulate the tube local buckling, and
give better predictions of the interaction between the ϕ = ⎨aλ2 + bλ + c (λo < λ ≤ λp ) (8)
⎪d (−0.23χ 2 + 1) /(λ + 35) 2 (λ > λ )
⎩
steel tubes and the sandwiched concrete.
1 + (35 + 2λp − λo )e
(1) Sectional capacity CFDST cross-section;
a=
It assumed that the section capacity (Nu) of an CFDST
(λp − λo ) 2
stub column is the sum of the inner tube capacity (Ni,u) ;
b = e − 2 aλp ;
and the strength (Nosu,u) contributed by the outer tube
N u = N osc,u + N i,u
together with the concrete (Tao and Yu, 2006), i.e.:
c = 1 − aλo 2 − bλo ;
(3)
25 0.3 α n 0.05
d = [13000 + 4657 ln(
in which Ni,u=Asi·fyi, Asi and fyi are the cross-sectional area
235
f ck + 5
and yield strength of the inner steel tube respectively, )]( ) ( ) (circular),
f yo 0.1
25 0.3 α n 0.05
and Nosc,u is determined similarly to that of fully concrete
d = [13500 + 4810 ln(
filled steel tubular sections (Han, 2007):
N osc,u = f scy Asco
235
f ck + 5
)]( ) ( ) (square);
(4) f yo 0 .1
−d
e=
(λp + 35) 3
in which, Asco=Aso+Ac, Aso and Ac are cross-sectional .
areas of the outer steel tube and sandwiched concrete,
respectively.
in which, λp and λo can be given as follows:
⎧⎪1743 / f yo
For circular CFDST:
f scy = C1 χ 2 f yo + C2 (1.14 + 1.02ξ ) f ck (5a) λp=⎨
circular)
⎪⎩ 1811/ f yo
;
For square CFDST: square
f scy = C1 χ 2 f yo + C2 (1.18 + 0.85ξ ) f ck ⎧⎪π / (420ξ + 550) / f scy
λ o =⎨
(5b)
where C1=α/(1+α), C2=(1+αn)/(1+α), α (=Aso/Ac) is steel
circular)
⎪⎩ π / (220ξ + 450) / f scy
ratio and αn (=Aso/Ac,nominal) is nominal steel ratio,
square)
when N/N u ≥ 2ϕ 3η o :
2006): two circular CFDSTs [shown in Figure 1 (a)], two square
CFDSTs [as shown in Figure 1 (b)], and two
+ ) =1
conventional CFSTs, were carried out under axial
ϕN u
N a M
( (9a) sustained long-term loading. These specimens were
d Mu
when N/N u < 2ϕ 3η o :
tested under two stages, including the long-term service
testing and ultimate load testing. In addition, ten CFDST
− b( ) − c( )+ ( ) =1
N 2 N 1 M and CFST specimens without experiencing long-term
(9b) loading were also tested to measure their ultimate loads
Nu Nu d Mu
where a = 1 − 2ϕ 2η o ;
for comparison purposes.
1− ζ 2(ζ o − 1) ;
b = 3 o2 , c =
ϕ ηo ηo 1500
d = 1 − 0.4(
π
NE =
2
Escelastic Asc 600
λ
elastic Measured
2
; Esc is elastic modulus of
300 Predicted
E ( A + Asi ) + Ec Ac
CFDST column and can be presented as: 0
Escelastic = s so 0 300 600 900 1200
Asc Time, t (day)
For circular CFDST:
ζ o = 1 + 0.18ξ −1.15
(a) Circular CFDST
1200
For square CFDST:
ζ o = 1 + 0.14ξ −1.3
900
N (kN)
0.75 3000
βL
0.5 2000
0.25 With long-term effects
1000
0 Without long-term effects
0
Circular Square CFST
CFDST CFDST 0 30 60 90 120 150
k χ = 0.65χ 2 − 0.45χ + 1
deformations and the measured results for typical
CFDSTs. A good agreement was achieved between the (10)
predicted and tested results.
An FE model, using ABAQUS soft package, was also 4. Beam columns subjected to cyclic loading
established by Han et al. (2009d) to investigate the Han et al. (2006) reported a series of cyclic tests on
influence of the long-term loading on the behaviour of CFDST columns. The test parameters included the
CFDSTs. In the FE model, a material subroutine program
(χ=0-0.77), and the axial load level (n=0-0.65). Twenty-
section types (circular and square), the hollow ratio
(UMAT) based on a visco-elasticity constitutive model
was adopted for simulating the concrete material with the eight CFDST column specimens (including 16 circular
time effect considered, and then the damage plasticity CFDSTs and 12 square CFDSTs) and five hollow steel
model provided in ABAQUS 6.5 was used to define the tubes were tested under constant axial loading and
concrete material to predict the ultimate strength of the cyclically increasing flexural loading.
CFDST columns. Figure 8 presents the typical failure mode of a square
Figure 7 compares the axial load (N) versus lateral CFDST column. As the specimen attained its ultimate
deflection (um) at mid-height curves with long-term strength, an outward bulge of the outer steel tube formed
effect considered or not (Han et al., 2009d). The curves a complete ring on each side of the rigid loading stub,
were calculated by finite element analysis for a typical whilst an inward buckling for the inner steel tube and
circular CFDST column. It was found that, long-term crushing of the sandwiched concrete were also observed
loading tends to decrease the ultimate strength of the at the same time. It seems that the failure features of the
CFDST column whilst increase the corresponding CFDST specimens under cyclic loading were very
deflection, shown in Figure 6. This is mainly owing to similar to those of CFST columns (Han et al., 2006).
the fact that, the increasing deformation caused by
concrete creep during the long-term loading tends to
80
Outward buckling 40
P (kN)
0
(a) Specimen after testing
-40
Measured
Predicted
-80
Crushed concrete -60 -30 0 30 60
Δ (mm)
(c) Inner steel tube From the test results, it was also found that, under a
same axial load level, the shape and the changing trend
of the hysteretic curves of the CFDSTs are generally
Figure 8. Failure mode of CFDST beam columns
of the hollow ratio (χ) for the CFDST columns.
similar to those of the CFSTs, regardless of the influence
χ=0.54
18 1
χ=0
0.8
9
P /P ue
χ=0.30
M (kN·m)
0.6
0 Hollow
0.4 steel tube
-9 0.2
Measured
Predicted 0
-18
0 25 50 75 100
φ (1/m)
-0.12 -0.06 0 0.06 0.12
Δ (mm)
Figure 9. Typical M-φ hysteretic curve Figure 11. Effect of hollow ratio (χ) on
P-Δ envelope curves
ratio of inner steel tube (Di/ti) and hollow ratio (χ) on the
tube (fyi), strength of concrete (fcu), width to thickness
φB φ
in this figure are described as follows:
(1) The stiffness in the elastic stage (Ke) is given by Han O
-0.2My
2
K e = Es I so + 0.6 Ec I c + Es I si
et al. (2006) and EC4 (2005): 4
D′
(11)
C′ 3′ B′
1′
in which Iso, Isi, and Ic are the moment of inertia for the
outer steel tube, the inner steel tube and the core concrete, A′
respectively.
(2) Yielding moment (My) corresponding to point B. My
A1c + B1
can be calculated by
Figure 12. M-φ hysteretic models
(b) Square CFDST
My = f ( χ , n) M yu
( A1 + B1 )( pn + q)
(12)
where Myu is the ultimate moment of the composite beam Figure 12 (b) shows the M-φ hysteretic model for
columns under constant axial load level (n), and can be square columns (Han et al., 2009). Parameters used in
this model are as follows:
determined by using Eq. (9), the expressions of A1, B1, p,
(1) The stiffness in the elastic stage (Ke) is given by Han
q, c and f ( χ , n) are given by Han et al. (2009a).
K e = Es I so + 0.2 Ec I c + Es I si
et al. (2006) and AIJ (1997):
(16)
(3) The bending moment (Ms) corresponding to point A (2) The yielding moment (My) corresponding to point A
M s = 0.6 M y
in Figure 12(a) can be calculated by
M y = M yu f1 ( χ , n)
can be calculated by:
(13)
(4) The curvature (φy) corresponding to yielding moment
(17)
(3) Bending moment (MB) and curvature (φB)
φ y = 0.0135( f cu / 60 + 1)(1.51 − n) (14)
(My) can be calculated by corresponding to point B.
M B = M y (1 − n ) ko f 2 ( χ , n ) (18)
φB = 20φe (2 − n)(1 − 0.217 χ )
(5) The stiffness in the descending stage (Kp) can be
(19)
K p = α d0 K e where k o = (ξ + 0.4) −2
, φe = 0.544 f yo /( Es Bo ) , and the
calculated by
(15)
expressions of f1 ( χ , n) and f 2 ( χ , n) are provided in Han
where α d0 = α d / 1000 and α d = An 2 + Bn + C ,
et al. (2009a).
the expressions of A, B and C are presented in Han et al. Based on theoretical analysis, influence of the
(2009a). changing axial load level (n), nominal steel ratio (an),
strength of outer steel tube (fyo), strength of inner steel
ratio of inner steel tube (Di/ti) and hollow ratio (χ) on the
M tube (fyi), strength of concrete (fcu), width to thickness
Δp ks =
N u (t )
Ka (20)
Δu
Nu
Δ
O
where Nu(t) is the ultimate strength of the column at the
2
A′
5 fire duration time (t), Nu is the ultimate strength of the
column at ambient temperature and can be determined by
C′ D′
4′ 3′
using the formulae presented in Section 2 of this paper.
1′
B′
Obviously, ks decreases with an increase in fire duration
time. By using regression analysis, the following
expression was obtained:
ks = ( Ato2 + Bto + 1)k t
lateral deflection (Δ) relationship
Figure 13. A schematic view of a lateral load (P) versus
(21)
⎪1 + at o
tube can undertake more redistributed internal force 2.5
⎪ 1
during the fire exposure (Yang and Han, 2008).
kt = ⎨ t1 < t o ≤ t 2
⎪ bt o + c
Figure 14 shows the appearances of a circular CFDST (22a)
column before and after subjected to ISO-834 standard
⎪kt o + d to > t2
⎪
fire (Lu et al., 2007). It was found that the failure mode
⎩
of the CFDST is generally similar to that of a CFST (Han
et al., 2009b).
kt = ⎨ 2 t1 < t o ≤ t 2
⎪ bt o + c
(22b)
⎪kt + d to > t 2
⎪ o
⎩
N (kN)
(23b) 1000
in which R is in hour, kho and kLR can be expressed as: 500 Without fire exposure
k ho = exp[(αλ2o + βλ o + γ ) χ 2 ] ;
With fire exposure
0
ε (με)
0 10000 20000 30000 40000
⎧(nf − k s ) /(0.77 − k s ) (k s < nf < 0.77)
⎪ (k s < 0.77)
= ⎨1 /(3.695 − 3.5nf ) (nf ≥ 0.77)
⎪⎩ω (nf − k s ) /(1 − k s ) (k s ≥ 0.77)
k LR (a) Circular CFDST
2000
where ks is the strength index of the CFDST columns
1500
subjected to fire on all sides [Eq. (20)] and is equal to
N (kN)
zero when it is less than zero; nf is the fire load level, α,
β, γ and ω are the coefficients related to the fire
1000
ε (με)
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
6. Behaviour after exposure to fire
If a CFDST column was damaged by fire, it would be
necessary to evaluate its residual strength and find the (b) Square CFDST
Figure 16. Effect of fire exposure on N-ε relations
best solution for post-fire repair. In this regard, Yu et al.
(2009) carried out a series of tests to investigate the post-
fire behaviour of CFDST stub columns.
7. Concluding remarks
Figure 15 compares two typical CFDST stub columns
This paper briefly summarises some recent research
with fire exposure or not. It was found that the fire
outcomes of CFDST members presented by the authors
exposure had no apparent influence on the failure modes
and their collaborators.
(Yu et al., 2009).
concluded that, when the hollow ratio (χ) of a CFDST is
From the experimental and numerical results, it can be