Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agr9016m Final
Agr9016m Final
Agr9016m Final
benefits and costs of implementing each The use of digital technologies in warehouse
approach and to consider how well it will fit operations can help to reduce costs, improve
with the enterprise's existing systems and efficiency, and increase the overall
processes. performance of agri-food enterprises.
can track the location and condition of their technologies and systems, which can include
equipment and assets in real time. This can tasks such as installing sensors and IoT
used to schedule and track the tasks and employees on the new technology.
activities of warehouse staff, helping to The digital systems and applications should
optimize their time and improve be thoroughly tested before implementation.
productivity (Vern et al., 2022).
If you are upgrading or changing your
current systems, you will need to import
3
data from your existing systems into the new The process of digitizing a warehouse in the
systems agri-food sector is similar to digitizing a
warehouse in general, but with some
After testing and quality assurance, the new
additional considerations. In the first step, it
systems are deployed and go live, and the
is important to analyze the areas in terms of
old systems are phased out.
food safety, traceability, and perishability.
Once the warehouse has been digitized, it is
So let’s take an example of a warehouse of
important to monitor the performance of the
tomatoes. There are certain precautions that
new systems and make adjustments as
should be considered before implementing
necessary to ensure that they continue to
the use of digital technologies for
meet the warehouse's needs over time
streamlining warehouse operations.
(Esteso et al., 2022). This can include
regular software updates, hardware When digitizing a tomato warehouse, it's
maintenance, and monitoring of the data to important to consider the unique
improve the system. In planning, it is characteristics of tomatoes and how they
important to consider regulatory may impact the implementation of digital
compliance, specifically food safety technologies. Here are a few precautions
regulations, when choosing and that should be taken before digitizing a
implementing technologies and in the tomato warehouse.
implementation, it is necessary to make sure
Tomatoes can be easily damaged and are
that the implementation process does not
perishable, so it's important to ensure that
interfere with food safety or risk
digital technologies and systems do not
contamination.
interfere with food safety or risk
Overall, digitizing a warehouse is a complex contamination. This can be achieved by
process that requires a strategic approach using equipment and materials that are food-
and careful planning. It's important to have a grade and implementing proper sanitation
clear understanding of the goals and protocols.
objectives of the project, as well as the
Tomatoes are sensitive to temperature
specific digital technologies and systems
fluctuations, so it's important to ensure that
that will be used to achieve them (Elyasi &
digital technologies and systems are capable
Teimoury, 2023).
4
Tomatoes are delicate and can be easily picking, packing, and shipping. This reduces
damaged, so it's important to implement the need for manual labor and increases
digital technologies and systems that can efficiency. They integrated robotics to
automate and optimize handling procedures automate tasks such as palletizing and
in order to minimize damage and waste. packing, which helps to improve efficiency
and reduce labor costs. They are also using
It's important to ensure that digital
computer vision and sensors to monitor the
technologies and systems integrate
quality of bananas and identify any issues
seamlessly with existing systems and
such as spoilage or pests. Furthermore,
processes in the warehouse. This will help to
Chiquita has added digital traceability
minimize disruptions to warehouse
systems that can accurately track the
operations and ensure a smooth transition to
movement of bananas throughout the supply
digitization.
chain and quickly identify any issues that
By taking these precautions into account, may arise and has also implemented a lean
you can help ensure that the digitization of management system (Ramos et al., 2022).
your tomato warehouse is successful and
There are many benefits of streamlining
benefits operations and safety.
warehouse operations for digitizing the agri-
food sector. Through automating and
5
optimizing various tasks and processes, agri- employees may be resistant to change or
food enterprises can reduce the time and worried about their job security in the face
resources needed to complete them. This can of automation. This can lead to morale
lead to cost savings and improved issues and potentially impact productivity
productivity(Tian, 2017). Digital tools can (Roba et al., 2017).
help to reduce errors and improve the
Overall, the use of digital technologies in
accuracy of tasks such as inventory
warehouse operations can help to reduce
management and order fulfillment. This can
costs, improve efficiency, and increase the
lead to improved customer satisfaction and
overall performance of agri-food enterprises.
reduced costs associated with mistakes.
These tools can also provide real-time Cross-Industry technologies and
However, there are few potential drawbacks of their supply chain operations. Using data
systems can be expensive, particularly for efficiency, and improve yields by use of
small or medium-sized enterprises. such tools for example social media and
Managing and maintaining these digital online marketing, agri-food enterprises can
systems can be complex and require reach and engage with customers more
make agri-food enterprises vulnerable to digital tools such as blockchain and sensors
disruptions caused by technical issues or to track and monitor food safety and quality,
system failures and most importantly, some agri-food enterprises can reduce the risk of
6
recalls and improve customer confidence. There are several financial measures that can
By automating tasks and optimization of be used to analyze the success of digitization
processes, agri-food enterprises can reduce in the agri-food sector, including:
labor costs and improve efficiency, leading
Return on investment (ROI): This
to cost savings and increased profitability.
measure calculates the profit or loss
However, it is important to note that the
generated by an investment as a
value of digitization in agri-food enterprises
percentage of the initial investment.
will depend on a range of factors, including
It can be used to evaluate the
the specific needs and context of the
financial performance of a
enterprise, the cost and complexity of
digitization project and determine
implementing digital technologies, and the
whether it has been a good
potential risks and challenges involved (Xu
investment.
et al., 2022). It is important for agri-food
Cost-benefit analysis: This method
enterprises to carefully evaluate the potential
compares the costs of implementing
benefits and costs of digitization and to plan
a digitization project with the
for a smooth transition to digital systems.
benefits it is expected to generate. It
In terms of measuring the success of these can help agri-food enterprises to
technologies in the agri-food sector, some determine whether the benefits
key metrics to consider: justify the costs and to prioritize
investments.
Cost savings: One important measure
Net present value (NPV): This
of success is the extent to which the
measure calculates the present value
technology has helped to reduce
of a project's expected cash flows,
costs and increase efficiency.
taking into account the time value of
Improved productivity: Another key
money. It can help agri-food
metric is the extent to which the
enterprises to evaluate the long-term
technology has helped to improve
financial viability of a digitization
the productivity of the enterprise.
project.
Increased revenue: If the technology
Payback period: This measure
has helped to increase sales or
calculates the amount of time it will
market share
take for a project to pay back its
7
References
Ariza-Sentís, M., Vélez, S., & Valente, J. (2023). Dataset on UAV RGB videos acquired over a
vineyard including bunch labels for object detection and tracking. Data in Brief, 46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108848
Dal Mas, F., Massaro, M., Ndou, V., & Raguseo, E. (2023). Blockchain technologies for
sustainability in the agrifood sector: A literature review of academic research and business
perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122155
Elyasi, A., & Teimoury, E. (2023). Applying Critical Systems Practice meta-methodology to improve
sustainability in the rice supply chain of Iran. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35,
453–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.024
Esteso, A., Alemany, M. M. E., Ortiz, Á., & Iannacone, R. (2022). Crop planting and harvesting
planning: Conceptual framework and sustainable multi‐objective optimization for plants with
variable molecule concentrations and minimum time between harvests. Applied Mathematical
Modelling, 112, 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.07.023
Hajimirzajan, A., Vahdat, M., Sadegheih, A., Shadkam, E., & Bilali, H. el. (2021). An integrated
strategic framework for large-scale crop planning: sustainable climate-smart crop planning and
agri-food supply chain management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 709–732.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.12.016
Neri, A., Cagno, E., Lepri, M., & Trianni, A. (2021). A triple bottom line balanced set of key
performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of industrial supply chains.
Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 648–691.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.018
Ramos, E., Coles, P. S., Chavez, M., & Hazen, B. (2022). Measuring agri-food supply chain
performance: insights from the Peruvian kiwicha industry. Benchmarking, 29(5), 1484–1512.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0544
Roba, G. M., Lelea, M. A., & Kaufmann, B. (2017). Manoeuvring through difficult terrain: How local
traders link pastoralists to markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 85–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.016
Sabri, Y., Micheli, G. J. L., & Nuur, C. (2018). Exploring the impact of innovation implementation on
supply chain configuration. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 49,
60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENGTECMAN.2018.06.001
9
Tey, T. O., Chen, S., Cheong, Z. X., Choong, A. S. X., Ng, L. Y., & Chemmangattuvalappil, N. G.
(2021). Synthesis of a sustainable integrated biorefinery to produce value-added chemicals from
palm-based biomass via mathematical optimisation. Sustainable Production and Consumption,
26, 288–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.012
Tian, F. (2017). A supply chain traceability system for food safety based on HACCP, blockchain &
Internet of things. 14th International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management,
ICSSSM 2017 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2017.7996119
Vern, P., Miftah, N., & Panghal, A. (2022). Digital technology: implementation challenges and
strategies in agri-food supply chain. Advanced Series in Management, 27, 17–30.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120220000027002
Walaszczyk, A., & Galinska, B. (2020). Food origin traceability from a consumer’s perspective.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12051872
Wehrle, M., Lechler, S., von der Gracht, H. A., & Hartmann, E. (2020). Digitalization and its Impact
on the Future Role of SCM Executives in Talent Management – An International Cross-Industry
Delphi Study. Journal of Business Logistics, 41(4), 356–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/JBL.12259
Xu, J., Zhao, W., Wei, C., Hu, X., & Li, X. (2022). A model for recognizing farming behaviors of
plantation workers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107395