1 SICK LEAVE

pg 458
Months No. of sick leaves
Jul 75 n 6
Aug 108
Sep 75
Oct 85
Nov 82
Dec 97

Whether sick leaves are uniformly distributed

Do Goodness-of-Fit test by Chi-Square

Step 1 Null hypothH0 Sick leaves are uniformly distributed

Alternate H1 Sick leaves are not uniformly distributed

Step 2 Level of si a 0.05

Step 3 Critical values

Chi-SquareZ2 0.05,5 11.0705

Step 4 Calculated Chi-Square 9.862069

Observed fExpected f (fo-fe)^2 (fo-fe)^2/fe

75 87 144 1.655172
108 87 441 5.068966
75 87 144 1.655172
85 87 4 0.045977 p-value
82 87 25 0.287356 0.079239
97 87 100 1.149425

Step 5 Calculated Chi-Square value falls in the acceptance region

Also, p-value not less than a
Sick leaves are uniformly distributed
 1 MILKY
pg 458
MONTHS NO.OF BOTTLES SOLD
MONDAY 110 n 7
TUEDAY 108
WED 135
THU 175
FRI 182
SAT 178
SUN 183
Whether sick leaves are uniformly distributed
Do Goodness-of-Fit test by Chi-Square

Step 1 Null hypothH0 bottles are uniformly distributed

Alternate H1 bottles are not uniformly distributed

Step 2 Level of si a 0.01

Step 3 Critical values

Chi-SquareZ2 0.01,(n-1)6 16.81189

Step 4 Calculated Chi-Square valu 40.18301

Observed fExpected frequ (fo-fe)^2 (fo-fe)^2/fe

110 153 1849 12.08497
108 153 2025 13.23529
135 153 324 2.117647
175 153 484 3.163399 p-value
182 153 841 5.496732 2.873161E-08
178 153 625 4.084967
183 153 900 5.882353
Step 5 Calculated Chi-Square value falls in the rejection region
Also, p-value not less than a
sale of mineral water bottles are not uniformly distributed
 3 NATIONAL HIGHTWAYS LTD.
pg 458
Months NO.OF ACCIDENTS
JAN 49 n 6
FEB 58
MAR 63
APR 48
MAY 65
JUNE 59

Whether sick leaves are uniformly distributed

Do Goodness-of-Fit test by Chi-Square

Step 1 Null hypothH0 Sick leaves are uniformly distributed

Alternate H1 Sick leaves are not uniformly distributed

Step 2 Level of si a 0.05

Step 3 Critical values

Chi-SquareZ2 0.05,5 11.0705

Step 4 Calculated Chi-Square 4.385965

Observed fExpected f (fo-fe)^2 (fo-fe)^2/fe

49 57 64 1.122807
58 57 1 0.017544
63 57 36 0.631579
48 57 81 1.421053 p-value
65 57 64 1.122807 0.495284
59 57 4 0.070175

Step 5 Calculated Chi-Square value falls in the acceptance region

Also, p-value not less than a
Sick leaves are uniformly distributed
 4 PRINTING PAPER COMPANY
pg 458
Whether atleast 15% of the products are defective
Do Goodness-of-Fit test by Chi-Square

Step 1 Null hypothH0 Atleast 15% of the products are defective

Alternate H1 Atleast 15% of the products are not defective

Step 2 Level of si a 0.05

Step 3 Critical values

Chi-SquareZ2 0.05,1 3.841459

Step 4 Calculated Chi-Square 1.960784

f0 f1
Defective 20 15 1.666667 p-value
Good 80 85 0.294118 0.161429

Step 5 Calculated Chi-Square value falls in the acceptance region

Also, p-value not less than a
Atlesat 15% of the products are defective
 5 FLAT TV
pg 458
Income gr Middle-incUpper-midd
Upper-inc Row total r 3
Consumer opinion c 3
Preferred 55 65 45 165 df (r-1)(c-1 4
Did not pr 65 25 55 145
Indifferent 65 45 75 185
Column tot 185 135 175 495

Whether the consumer opinion is independent of income group

Do Test of Independence by Chi-Square

Step 1 Null hypothH0 Consumer opinion is independent of income group

Alternate H1 Consumer opinion is dependent of income group

Step 2 Level of si a 0.05

Step 3 Critical values

Chi-SquareZ2 0.05,4 9.487729

Step 4 Calculated Chi-Square 22.68098

Observed frequency
Middle in Upper middUpper income
Prefer wit 55 65 45 165
Did not pre 65 25 55 145
Indifferent 65 45 75 185
185 135 175 495 N

Expected frequency
Middle in Upper middUpper income
Prefer wit 61.66667 45 58.33333
Did not pre 54.19192 39.54545 51.26263
Indifferent 69.14141 50.45455 65.40404

Chi-Square value
Middle in Upper middUpper income
Prefer wit 0.720721 8.888889 3.047619
Did not pre 2.155573 5.350052 0.272478 p-value
Indifferent 0.248061 0.589681 1.407901 0.000147

Step 5 Calculated Chi-Square value falls in the rejection region

Also, p-value less than a
Null hypothesis is rejected
Alternate hypothesis is accepted
Consumer opinion is dependent of income group
 6 SCIENTIFIC CALCULATOR
pg 458
AGE GROUABOVE 15 ABOVE 20 ABOVE 25 ROW TOTAL r 3
CONUSMER OPINION c 3
LIKED NEW 95 85 70 250 df 4
Did not pr 35 55 72 162
Indifferent 30 34 35 99
Column tot 160 174 177 511

Whether the consumer opinion is independent of income group

Do Test of Independence by Chi-Square

Step 1 Null hypothH0 Consumer opinion is independent of income group

Alternate H1 Consumer opinion is dependent of income group

Step 2 Level of si a 0.1

Step 3 Critical values

Chi-SquareZ2 0.1,4 7.77944

Step 4 Calculated Chi-Square 16.17443

Observed frequency
Middle in Upper middUpper income
Prefer wit 95 85 70 250
Did not pre 35 55 72 162
Indifferent 30 34 35 99
160 174 177 511 N

Expected frequency
Middle in Upper middUpper income
Prefer wit 78.27789 85.1272 86.59491
Did not pre 50.72407 55.16243 56.1135
Indifferent 30.99804 33.71037 34.29159

Chi-Square value
Middle in Upper middUpper income
Prefer wit 3.572261 0.00019 3.180223
Did not pre 4.874341 0.000478 4.497684 p-value
Indifferent 0.032134 0.002488 0.014635 0.002794

Step 5 Calculated Chi-Square value falls in the rejection region

Also, p-value less than a
Null hypothesis is rejected
Alternate hypothesis is accepted
Consumer opinion is dependent of income group