People vs. Fortuno (73 Phil 407)

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

People vs.

Fortuno (73 Phil 407)

● Doctrine
Estafa on issuance of check under Art. 315 par. 2 (d), as amended by R.A. no. 4885

● Facts
Defendant Fortunato issued a check from his bank to pay for his rent that is already due. The check was
then dishonored for the lack of funds and the defendant was presented guilty of estafa and sentenced with
two months and one day of arresto mayor and was charged to pay the indemnification of PHP 60.00

● Issue
W/n the defendant was guilty of estafa

● Ruling
No, the defendant is not guilty of estafa. According to Art. 315 par. 2 (d), as amended by R.A. no. 4885,
there is no estafa if it is without the knowledge of the payee that the drawer has insufficient amount to pay
his pre-existing obligation. In this case, provided that the defendant has nothing in his bank to be issued
with a check would not constitute estafa.

You might also like