Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exposure To Air Pollution and Incidence of Atopic Dermatitis in The General Population: A National Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Exposure To Air Pollution and Incidence of Atopic Dermatitis in The General Population: A National Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Exposure To Air Pollution and Incidence of Atopic Dermatitis in The General Population: A National Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Background: To date, little evidence is available to determine whether atopic dermatitis (AD) can be
caused by exposure to air pollutants, including gases and particulate matter.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between air pollutants and incidence of AD using the
National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database.
Methods: We included 209,168 subjects from the general population previously not diagnosed with AD
between 2008 and 2013. Long-term average concentration of air pollutants before diagnosis was calculated
for each subject.
Results: For 1,030,324 person-years, incident cases of AD were observed in 3203 subjects. There was a
significant positive association between incidence of AD and long-term average concentration of
particulate matter smaller than 2.5 m in diameter (hazard ratio [HR], 1.420; 95% CI, 1.392-1.448; for
1 g/m3), particulate matter smaller than 10 m in diameter (HR, 1.333, 95% CI, 1.325-1.341; for 1 g/m3),
sulfur dioxide (HR, 1.626; 95% CI, 1.559-1.695; for 1 parts per billion), nitrogen dioxide (HR, 1.200; 95% CI,
1.187-1.212; for 1 parts per billion), and carbon monoxide (HR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.004-1.005; for 1 parts per
billion) after adjusting for age, sex, income, comorbid diseases, and meteorologic variables.
Limitations: The National Health Insurance Service database lacks detailed information on individual
subjects.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that long-term exposure to air pollutants, including gases and
particulate matter, is an independent risk factor for developing AD. ( J Am Acad Dermatol https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jaad.2021.05.061.)
Key words: air pollutants; allergic comorbidities; atopic dermatitis; disease; fine particulate matter; national
health program.
From the Department of Dermatology, Hanyang University Guri Reprints not available from the authors.
Hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University. Correspondence to: Hyun-Min Seo, MD, PhD, Department of
Funding sources: Supported by the research fund of Hanyang Dermatology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153,
University (HY-2020). Gyeongchun-ro, Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do 11923, Republic of
IRB approval status: Approved by the Ethics Committee of Korea. E-mail: blackshm@hanyang.ac.kr.
Hanyang University Guri Hospital (GURI 2020-02-010) and Published online July 24, 2021.
conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration 0190-9622/$36.00
of Helsinki. Ó 2021 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
Accepted for publication May 25, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.05.061
1
2 Park, Kim, and Seo J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2021
organic carbon are important detrimental compo- It contains a large volume of representative informa-
nents of PM2.5.6 tion that does not require privacy regulation.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory Subjects who had been treated for AD or comorbid
skin disease that primarily occurs in early childhood. diseases during the screening period (2002-2007)
Exposure to air pollutants can exacerbate atopic were excluded. Age, sex, location, income, and
diseases or influence their prevalence in young diagnostic codes based on the International
children.4,7 Air pollutants are likely to aggravate AD Classification of Diseases, tenth revision, (ICD-10)
by damaging the skin barrier were retrieved. This study
or immune responses. was approved by the Ethics
Indoor and outdoor air pol- CAPSULE SUMMARY Committee of Hanyang
lutants have been considered University Guri Hospital
potential risk factors for d
Long-term exposure to air pollutants, (GURI 2020-02-010) and
exacerbating AD.8 Among including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen was conducted in accor-
these pollutants, particulate dioxide, carbon monoxide, particulate dance with the principles of
matter smaller than 10 m in matter \2.5 m in diameter (PM2.5), and the Declaration of Helsinki.
diameter (PM10) and PM2.5 particulate matter \10 m in diameter
have become a great concern (PM10), is independently associated with Study subjects and
for public health, particularly increased risk of developing atopic definition of clinical
in Asia, due to the large dermatitis (AD). outcomes
amount of anthropogenic d A 1 g/m increase in long-term PM2.5
3 Patients who had an ICD-
emissions from East Asia, and PM10 average concentration was 10 code of L20 (AD) were
including China.9 associated with a 42.0% and 33.3% identified from the NHIS-
Despite various studies re- increase in the development of AD, NSC. Comorbidities were
porting a significant associa- respectively. defined as allergic rhinitis
tion between air pollutants (ICD-10 codes J30), asthma
and AD, most previous cross- (ICD-10 codes J45), or
sectional studies have had a selection bias caused by allergic conjunctivitis (ICD-10 codes H10.1, H10.45,
misclassification because the diagnosis of AD was and H10.40). To improve the accuracy of the
based simply on reports from patients or parents.10-12 analysis, only the subjects who had at least 2
Our retrospective cohort study reported here used principal diagnostic codes for each disease were
survival models to investigate how the risk of included. The diagnosis date of a disease was used as
developing AD changes over time for covariates, the entry date for patients with disease.
including particulate and gaseous air pollution. The
aim of this study was to evaluate the association Measurements of air pollutants
between outdoor air pollutants and AD using the Ambient particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10), gaseous
National Health Insurance Service-National Sample air pollution (sulfur dioxide [SO2], nitrogen dioxide
Cohort (NHIS-NSC) database. [NO2], carbon monoxide [CO], and ozone [O3]),
temperature, and humidity were measured hourly
MATERIALS AND METHODS at the sites of the Korean Nationwide Meteorological
Study design and database Observatory by the Korean Department of
This retrospective cohort study examined approx- Environmental Protection. To assess the long-term
imately 1 million representative samples from the health effects of air pollution, the monitor nearest the
NHIS-NSC. One hundred percent of the Korean residence of each study subject was used to assess
population is covered by the NHIS, with health average pollutant concentrations for that individual.
coverage divided into 3 categories: the National To exclude the effect of exposure to air pollutants
Health Insurance program for employees, for self- after AD diagnosis, the long-term average concen-
employed, and for the medical aid system. In 2013, tration of air pollutants before diagnosis was calcu-
97.2% (n = 49,989,620) of the population was lated for each subject. For subjects who were not
covered by the National Health Insurance and 2.8% diagnosed with AD, the average concentration of
(n = 1,458,871) of the population was covered by the exposure was calculated from the entry date to the
medical aid system. end of follow-up.
Due to the large volume and lack of confidenti- A geographically based average concentration of
ality with regard to personal information in the each air pollutant was measured hourly at the 313
National Health Insurance database, the NHIS-NSC monitoring facilities The 256 residential zip codes
was constructed as a representative sample database. were matched with the nearest monitoring facilities.
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Park, Kim, and Seo 3
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j
Table II. Ambient particulate and gaseous air pollution and incidence of atopic dermatitis in the overall
general population (n = 209,168)
HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Adjusted Adjusted
Air pollutant Unadjusted P value Model 1* P value Model 2y P value
Long-term average concentration
PM2.5z 1.713 (1.693-1.734) \.001 1.458 (1.431-1.486) \.001 1.420 (1.392-1.448) \.001
PM10z 1.395 (1.388-1.403) \.001 1.333 (1.325-1.341) \.001 1.319 (1.311-1.327) \.001
SO2x 2.171 (2.072-2.276) \.001 1.698 (1.627-1.772) \.001 1.626 (1.559-1.695) \.001
NO2x 1.296 (1.283-1.310) \.001 1.208 (1.196-1.221) \.001 1.200 (1.187-1.212) \.001
O3x 0.807 (0.792-0.822) \.001 0.822 (0.808-0.837) \.001 0.814 (0.800-0.829) \.001
COx 1.007 (1.007-1.008) \.001 1.005 (1.005-1.006) \.001 1.005 (1.004-1.005) \.001
Sensitivity analysis 1 (long-term average concentration 1 month prior to AD diagnosis)
PM2.5z 2.021 (1.985-2.057) \.001 1.457 (1.428-1.485) \.001 1.430 (1.400-1.461) \.001
PM10z 1.413 (1.406-1.421) \.001 1.346 (1.337-1.354) \.001 1.325 (1.316-1.333) \.001
SO2x 2.209 (2.116-2.305) \.001 1.774 (1.701-1.850) \.001 1.705 (1.637-1.776) \.001
NO2x 1.308 (1.294-1.322) \.001 1.216 (1.203-1.229) \.001 1.203 (1.190-1.216) \.001
O3x 0.802 (0.787-0.817) \.001 0.816 (0.802-0.831) \.001 0.807 (0.793-0.822) \.001
COx 1.008 (1.007-1.008) \.001 1.005 (1.005-1.006) \.001 1.005 (1.005-1.006) \.001
Sensitivity analysis 2 (long-term average concentration 2 month prior to AD diagnosis)
PM2.5z 1.991 (1.956-2.026) \.001 1.440 (1.412-1.468) \.001 1.387 (1.359-1.416) \.001
PM10z 1.363 (1.356-1.371) \.001 1.292 (1.285-1.299) \.001 1.298 (1.291-1.306) \.001
SO2x 2.252 (2.155-2.354) \.001 1.782 (1.708-1.859) \.001 1.677 (1.609-1.749) \.001
NO2x 1.316 (1.301-1.331) \.001 1.217 (1.204-1.230) \.001 1.200 (1.188-1.213) \.001
O3x 0.808 (0.793-0.824) \.001 0.821 (0.807-0.836) \.001 0.818 (0.803-0.832) \.001
COy 1.008 (1.007-1.008) \.001 1.005 (1.005-1.006) \.001 1.005 (1.005-1.006) \.001
Sensitivity analysis 3 (long-term average concentration 6 month prior to AD diagnosis)
PM2.5z 1.854 (1.831-1.878) \.001 1.462 (1.434-1.491) \.001 1.367 (1.339-1.395) \.001
PM10z 1.263 (1.259-1.266) \.001 1.228 (1.224-1.233) \.001 1.191 (1.186-1.196) \.001
SO2x 2.434 (2.339-2.533) \.001 1.864 (1.788-1.944) \.001 1.680 (1.614-1.749) \.001
NO2x 1.344 (1.330-1.358) \.001 1.241 (1.227-1.255) \.001 1.224 (1.211-1.238) \.001
O3x 0.853 (0.836-0.870) \.001 0.853 (0.837-0.869) \.001 0.837 (0.822-0.853) \.001
COx 1.008 (1.007-1.008) \.001 1.005 (1.005-1.006) \.001 1.005 (1.004-1.005) \.001
AD, Atopic dermatitis; CO, carbon monoxide; HR, hazard ratio; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; O3, ozone; PM2.5, particulate matter \2.5 m in
diameter; PM10, particulate matter \10 m in diameter; ppb, parts per billion; SO2, sulfur dioxide.
*Adjusted for meteorologic variables.
y
Adjusted for age, sex, income, comorbid diseases and meteorological variables.
z
By 1 g/m3 increase.
x
By 1 ppb increase.
0.814; 95% CI 0.800-0.829; for 1 ppb). The results AD risk significantly increased or decreased were
were consistent in the sensitivity analysis. The effects 24.78 g/m3 for PM2.5, 48.93 g/m3 for PM10,
of covariates other than air pollutants on the inci- 0.005138 parts per million (ppm) for SO2,
dence of AD are presented in Supplemental Tables I 0.03436 ppm for NO2, 0.02054 ppm for O3, and
to VI (available via Mendeley at https://data. 0.5436 ppm for CO.
mendeley.com/datasets/w4rx3j7vmf/1.) Among the
covariates, age under 1 year, female sex, allergic DISCUSSION
rhinitis, high average temperature, and low average We conducted a retrospective cohort study of
relative humidity independently showed an 209,168 subjects to investigate the causal relationship
increased risk of an incidence of AD. between air pollutants and incidence of AD. The
We fit a Cox proportional hazards model that results of the analysis demonstrated 2 important
included spline terms for covariates and climate findings.
variables. The relationship between long-term First, long-term exposure to air pollutants was
average concentration of each air pollutant and the significantly associated with an increased risk for
incidence of AD was plotted (Fig 1, A to F ). For the developing AD in the general population. A 1 g/m3
long-term average concentration of each air increase in the long-term average concentration of
pollutant, thresholds at which the HR for incident PM2.5 and PM10 increased the incidence of AD by
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Park, Kim, and Seo 5
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j
42.0% and 33.3%, respectively. We also demon- corneum, disrupting the skin barrier and aggravating
strated that long-term exposure to gaseous air AD. A recent in vitro and in vivo study using cultured
pollutants, including SO2, NO2, and CO, was associ- keratinocytes and tape-stripped BALB/c mice
ated with increased risk for developing AD. Second, showed PM-induced skin barrier-disruption and
the relationship between PM2.5/PM10 concentration inflammation by increased mRNA expression of
and the risk of developing AD was significant above interleukin 8 and matrix metalloproteinase-1. In
24.78 and 48.93 g/m3, respectively. addition, an in vivo study showed intercellular
Air pollution has been considered a potential risk penetration of PM in the barrier-disrupted skin.14
factor for developing AD, although the exact bio- Another in vivo study using the Brown Norway rat
logic mechanism remains unclear. Air pollutants showed that the antioxidant desferrioxamine could
induce oxidative stress in the skin, leading to skin modulate chemically induced helper T cell type 2-
barrier dysfunction or immune dysregulation.8 In mediated autoimmunity by suppressing interleukin 4
2003, Niwa et al13 showed that increased oxidative cytokine.15 The results of these animal studies sug-
stress generated from environmental pollution can gest that oxidative stress and redox imbalances
induce oxidative protein damage in the stratum produce or exacerbate AD by disrupting the skin
6 Park, Kim, and Seo J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2021
barrier or enhancing helper T cell type 2 concentration (47.09 g/m3), which indicates that
polarization.8 PM2.5 is far more harmful to humans than is PM10.
Based on previous studies, air pollutants On the other hand, ultrafine particles, which are
including NO2, O3, and PM influence the prevalence smaller than PM2.5 and have a diameter of less than
of AD.10,16-18 In a study of 4907 French children 0.1 m, have recently been identified as a cause for
(9-11 years of age) residing at their current address concern for human health. A previous study of 41 AD
for 3 years or longer, lifetime eczema was signifi- patients aged 8 to 12 years showed that itching score
cantly associated with average 3-year concentrations was significantly associated with the concentration
of PM10 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.13; 95% CI, of ambient PM smaller than 0.1 m in diameter but
1.01-1.24), NO2 (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.42), NOx not of larger particles.25 The potential for PM smaller
(aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.18), and CO (aOR, 1.08; than 0.1 m in diameter to cause harm to human
95% CI, 1.00-1.21).10 A previous case-control study health, including skin diseases, is great, but the
comprising 198 cases with persistent allergic symp- precise role is unknown, and more research is
toms and 202 control subjects aged 3 to 8 years, needed. Collectively, these results suggest that
observed a higher median concentration of butyl PM2.5 is the factor most responsible for the occur-
benzyl phthalate in dust was among cases (0.15 mg/g rence and exacerbation of AD among outdoor air
dust) than among controls (0.15 mg/g dust).12 A pollutants.
previous birth cohort study by Morgenstern et al19 The prevalence of atopic diseases has been
showed that during the first 6 years of life, there was rapidly increasing worldwide. In 2008, Yu et al26
a strong positive association between distance to the reported that the prevalence of AD in the 48,606,787
nearest main road and eczema. The authors also Korean population was 2.2% at all ages. In children
found that NO2 exposure was positively associated aged less than 24 months, the prevalence of AD has
with eczema. increased from 19.8% to 23.8% between the years
The results of these studies suggest that both 2003 and 2008. In a recent systemic review about the
indoor and outdoor air pollutants are potent risk prevalence and incidence of AD, the authors showed
factors for developing AD. However, the studies that the incidence of AD ranged from 10.2 to 95.6 per
were limited by design and exposure assessment. 1000 person-years in children. In adults, the inci-
Ambient O3 is generally regarded as a toxic compo- dence of AD was 7.41 per 1000 person-years in
nent of the photochemical air pollution mixture. A 1968.27 To date, there is no study on the incidence of
previous study found a positive relationship be- AD in the Korean population.
tween ambient O3 concentration and hospital ad- Our study showed an incidence of 310.9 per
missions for asthma and AD in children.20 On the 100,000 person-years in the general population.
other hand, O3 has been widely applied in clinics in The difference between the current and previous
mechanisms of antimicrobial effect, immunoregula- studies in other countries is thought to be due mainly
tion, epigenetic modification, biosynthesis, and to a difference in the study methods. For example, in
vasodilation.21 Zeng et al22 showed that topical our study, only subjects with at least 2 major
ozone therapy may improve AD by restoring the diagnostic codes for AD were included and subjects
microbiome diversity in AD. Further research is treated for AD during the screening period were
needed on the conflicting results for O3. The results excluded from 2002 to 2007.
of our study confirmed that there is an association This study had several limitations. First, the effects
between air pollution and the development of AD in of air pollutants on AD were not entirely clear
a large retrospective cohort study. because there could have been other confounding
The effects of PM on AD were investigated in factors that we could not analyze, such as exposure to
several studies. A previous study revealed that fine indoor volatile organic compounds (eg, benzene,
particulates exacerbate AD symptoms more than do toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and formaldehyde)
coarse particulates.23 PM2.5, with its small size and as well as allergens and biologic materials (eg, pollen,
large number of component metals, can easily house dust mites, bacteria, and various fungal
penetrate deep into skin cells and can pose a higher spores). Second, it was difficult to confirm the
risk of AD. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, diagnosis of disease because it was identified based
Ngoc et al24 suggested that exposure to PM2.5 slightly on the NHIS claims database without reviewing
increases the incidence of skin disease compared to clinical charts. However, to our knowledge, this is
exposure to PM10. They also reported that humans the first study to investigate the association between
were at greater risk of diseases at lower PM2.5 outdoor air pollutants, particularly PM2.5 and PM10,
concentration (26.04 g/m3) than at PM10 and the occurrence of AD in a large cohort database.
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Park, Kim, and Seo 7
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j