Micro-Teaching Evaluation Aslı Kasabalı

Name&Surname: __________________________________ Date:___________________

Number: ________________

Criteria Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement

All Has missing aspects Needs to be

appropriately rearranged/revised
done almost totally

1) Are the content and delivery appropriate for

the level of ss?

2) Have the materials been designed/chosen

appropriately for the objectives and level of
the lesson?

3) Are the objectives of the lesson well-

communicated (integrated into) in the
lesson?

4) Is there a pre-stage where the preparation

activity is done?

5) Is the while-skills stage organised in a way to

introduce the new language? / to enable ss to
do the main task?

6) Is there post-skills stage where the activity

supports the aim and activities previously
done?

7) Is there a time-filler activity that is in

accordance with what has been covered in
the plan?

8) Are the instructions clear and supported by

examples/demos?

9) Does the student-teacher show enthusiasm in

his/her teaching?

10) Clear and correct use of language

Mark: /10

Comments: