Comments: I tried to make the checklist as simple as I could. When I filled it, I realized that the analyzed digital media had many particularities, and I assumed most materials have. Hence, I added the sections of comments as an opportunity to specify exceptions of points of interest. This exercise showed me the relevance of analyzing the materials that I use from a critical view and not only focusing on the contents.
Descriptor YES NO Comments
Accuracy The source provides Is the information accurate? (Inaccurate X materials from different authors. It’s important to information may include content errors or omissions). doble check the resources before using them. Relevance Does the information address one or more of X the class objectives? Production Quality The source provides Is the information clear and understandable? X X materials from different authors. It’s important to Is the layout easy to navigate? filter the resources before using them. Accessibility The audios and videos are Is the resource available in different formats? X one of the strong points of this website. Are there transcriptions or subtitles for audios and videos? Interactivity Does the resource encourage active learning X and class participation? Licensing Does the license allow you to use it in the way X you need? Holistic evaluation I like the website and the Do you like the material? Do you feel that fits X way that the resources are organized, but due its’ your standards and style? nature of collecting sources and activities created by different teachers, the quality of them vary.