Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meridium RBI-580 Inspection Strategies - Q12016
Meridium RBI-580 Inspection Strategies - Q12016
Meridium RBI-580 Inspection Strategies - Q12016
Copyright Notice
This documentation contains proprietary information of Meridium, Inc. It is provided under a license agreement containing
restrictions on use and disclosure. All rights including reproduction by photographic or electronic process and translation
into other languages of this material are fully reserved under copyright laws. Reproduction or use of this material in whole
or in part in any manner without written permission from Meridium, Inc., is strictly prohibited.
Trademarks
Other product names that are mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective
companies and are hereby acknowledged.
Revision History
The Individual Inspection Confidence (IIC) represents the degree of confidence that an inspection for a particular damage
mechanism will indentify it and be able to accurately measure its rate. Likewise the Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC)
represents the sum total confidence of all the inspections performed for particular damage mechanism as to how effective
they were in finding the damage mechanism and measuring its rate. The Aggregate Number of Inspections is total number
of past inspections at an Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC).
The Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC) is based on historical evidence accumulated from a review of
past inspection documentation and/or information obtained from discussions with plant personnel. In
most cases the analyst will be considering multiple past inspection records. Per API-581 no more than 6 of
the most recent inspections are required to provide the best information.
For each Degradation Mechanism the Meridium RBI methodology requires the Aggregate Number of
Inspections along with the Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC) in order to perform the risk assessment.
In order to obtain an Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC) and an Aggregate Number of Inspections for
each damage mechanism, each individual inspection needs to be assigned an Individual Inspection
Confidence (IIC). This is accomplished by comparing the type and extent of inspection to that provided in
the Strategy Rule Sets in the appendices directly following. Appendices B – G provide these guidelines for
determining the confidence for individual inspection scopes per degradation mechanism.
Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC) can be ascertained in terms of the number of the highest Individual Inspection
Confidence (IIC) assigned to those past inspections. The table below outlines the inspection confidence equivalency.
This table is the primary tool that is used for performing this roll up.
For example, let’s consider that we have 3 internal inspections and they have already had their individual inspection
confidences assigned as follows:
1 VH
1H
1M
Following the rule of 3’s, the Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC) would be assigned as a Very High (VH) level since
the highest Individual Inspection Confidence (IIC) considered was a Very High (VH). Using the triangular figure below,
we would then equivocate the number of lower confidence inspections to the assigned Aggregate Inspection
Confidence (AIC) of VH as follows:
1VH
3H
9M
27 L
1 VH = 1VH
1 H = 1/3 VH
1 M = 1/9 VH
Therefore the equivalent number of VH inspections = 1 + 1/3 + 1/9 = 1 4/9 VH. Since the ar/t table from API-581 only
uses integers, the 1 4/9 should be rounded down to the nearest whole number and for this example that is 1.
Therefore the Aggregate Inspection Confidence (AIC) would be assigned VH and Aggregate Number of Inspections
would be calculated to be 1.
2 Internal Corrosion Strategy Rules for Vessels, Exchangers, and Tanks (Appendix B)
Internal Corrosion Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix given in Fig 1
of this document. Table 1 below provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and minimum confidences by
risk level (Inspection Priority). Table 2 provides a list of the Intrusive Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work per each
minimum Inspection confidence level. Table 2 will always be used to specify inspection method and extent unless the rules
are satisfied in Appendix C for the allowance of Non-Intrusive Inspection methods. Table 3 provides a list of those Non-
Intrusive Inspection Methods and Extents.
Table 2 – Intrusive Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence- Int. Corrosion
Inspection Method and Scope Options for General, Localized, or Pitting Corrosion
Confidence
Very – High 100% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal
visual examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or
API 653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or
API 653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
The inspection should return the following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
Medium 25% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of 25% of the nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or
API 653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life <
Half Life < 5 yrs
10yrs 10yrs 15yrs 15yrs 20yrs 20yrs
No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
No Yes No Yes No Yes
LC09 LC10 LC11 LC111 LC12 LC121 LC13 LC131 LC14 LC141 LC15 LC151 LC16 LC161
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing
60
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended to
find.
Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
100% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
Damage Extent
Was damage found?
o Good description of the damaged area and its location and dimensions
LC10
Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing with additional
1 Outlet nozzle).
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
UT for General Corrosion only.
Damage Extent
60
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing with additional UT
1 Outlet nozzle).
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
for General Corrosion only.
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
Damage Extent
LC11
120
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
100% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of all nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
1 Outlet nozzle).
Inspection Required with additional UT for General
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC112
120
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
1 Outlet nozzle).
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive
Inspection Required with additional UT for General
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC113
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
1 Outlet nozzle).
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Non
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTINGI
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
LC12
120
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Non Intrusive
1 Outlet nozzle).
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC121
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
50% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of 50% of the nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
Damage Rate
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC13
180
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
50% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC131
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
1 Outlet nozzle).
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
Inspection Required with additional UT for General
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC132
180
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection
Required with additional UT for General Corrosion only.
1 Outlet nozzle).
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Non Intrusive
1 Outlet nozzle).
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTINGI
o Corrosion Rate
LC14
180
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
4 UT readings per head, 8 readings per shell course/band, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and
1 Outlet nozzle).
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Non Intrusive
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC141
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
25% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
examination of the same percentage of the nozzles, man-ways, and supports/appurtenances.
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
Damage Rate
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC15
240
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
25% Visual Coverage of the entire internal surface area of the vessel. This includes the internal visual
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel or Tank Inspector according to API 510 or API
653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC151
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC152
240
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
2 UT readings per head, 4 UT readings per shell course/band,
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection
Required with additional UT for General Corrosion only.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
Strategy Management
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
Interval
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC16
240
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
2 UT readings per head, 4 UT readings per shell course/band,
1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1 Outlet nozzle).
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Non Intrusive
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC161
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
3 Substituting Non-Intrusive Inspections In-Lieu of Intrusive Inspection
In order to perform a non-intrusive inspection in lieu of an intrusive inspection for Internal Corrosion, the conditions listed
in the table below must be satisfied for the particular risk ranking of the RBI Component
As an example if a Risk Assessment results in a an Internal Corrosion Risk Ranking of Medium High, a Non Intrusive
Inspection can be performed In-Lieu of Intrusive Inspection if all the following conditions are met:
Internal Corrosion Probability Category is 4 or 5 (low likelihood of failure).
Equipment has more than 10 years of acceptable service
There has been no appreciable impact due to CPP (Critical Process Variable) Excursions.
Data collected from past Inspections have confirmed that the only degradation mechanism is general corrosion.
Localized and/or pitting corrosion does not qualify.
Corrosion rate is less than 0.005in/yr.
4 Internal Corrosion Strategy Rule Set for Air Cooled Heat Exchangers (Appendix D)
Internal Corrosion Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix
given in Fig 1 of this document. Table 1 below provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and
minimum confidences by risk level (Inspection Priority). Table 2 provides a list of the Intrusive Inspection
Methods and Scopes of Work per each minimum Inspection confidence level. Table 2 will always be used to
specify inspection method and extent unless the rules are satisfied in Appendix C for the allowance of Non-
Intrusive Inspection methods. Table 3 provides a list of those Non-Intrusive Inspection Methods and Extents.
Table 2 – Intrusive Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence- Int. Corrosion
Confidence Method and Scope Options for General, Localized, or Pitting Corrosion
Minimum of 100% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal for partial
internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with a tube examination by
EC, RFEC, and backed up by IRIS Inspection in the same percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that conform to
ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work as a
minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and Instrument be qualified to
work by demonstration examination on the user’s equipment.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that conform to
ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work as a
minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and Instrument be qualified to
work by demonstration examination.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that conform to
ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work as a
minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and Instrument be qualified to
work by demonstration examination.
Table 3 – Non-Intrusive Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence- Int. Corrosion
Confidence Method and Scope Options for General Corrosion Only with Header Box and Tube Material
Corrosion Characteristics the same. The tube corrosion rate will be inferred from the header
box UT.
Very – High N/A
High 8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1 Outlet nozzle).
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life <
Half Life < 5 yrs
10yrs 10yrs 15yrs 15yrs 20yrs 20yrs
No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
No Yes No Yes No Yes
LC17 LC171 LC18 LC181 LC19 LC191 LC20 LC201 LC21 LC211 LC22 LC221 LC23 LC231
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 100% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal
for partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with
a tube examination by EC, RFEC, and backed up by IRIS Inspection in the same
percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the
High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing
start of work as a minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and
Instrument be qualified to work by demonstration examination on the user’s
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
equipment.
60
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 100% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal
for partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with
a tube examination by EC, RFEC, and backed up by IRIS Inspection in the same
percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
equipment.
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing with additional
Outlet nozzle).
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
UT for General Corrosion only.
Damage Extent
60
Outlet nozzle).
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
for General Corrosion only.
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
INSPECTION INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 100% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required.
for partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with
a tube examination by EC, RFEC, and backed up by IRIS Inspection in the same
percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the
start of work as a minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and
Instrument be qualified to work by demonstration examination on the user’s
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
equipment.
120
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 100% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal
for partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required.
a tube examination by EC, RFEC, and backed up by IRIS Inspection in the same
percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
equipment.
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
Outlet nozzle).
Inspection Required with additional UT for General
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
only. TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC182
Corrosion
120
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
ULTRASONIC
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
only. TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC183
Corrosion
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
ULTRASONIC
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
Outlet nozzle).
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Non
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
LC19
120
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
Med High Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Non Intrusive
Outlet nozzle).
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC191
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
INSPECTION INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 70% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal for
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required.
partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with a
tube examination by EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS Inspection in the same percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the
start of work as a minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and
Instrument be qualified to work by demonstration examination.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
180
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 70% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal for
partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with a
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required.
tube examination by EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS Inspection in the same percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
Outlet nozzle).
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive
Inspection Required with additional UT for General
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
only. TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC202
Corrosion
180
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
ULTRASONIC
Outlet nozzle).
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
INSPECTION INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Non Intrusive
Outlet nozzle).
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC21
180
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
8 UT readings per header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. 1 Inlet and 1
Outlet nozzle).
Med Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Non Intrusive
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC211
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
INSPECTION INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 50% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal for
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required.
partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with a
tube examination by EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS Inspection in the same percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the
start of work as a minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
240
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 50% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal for
partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with a
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required.
tube examination by EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS Inspection in the same percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Minimum of 50% of the header plugs removed or complete end plate removal for
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Intrusive Inspection Required with
partial internal visual inspection of the header box followed immediately with a
tube examination by EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS Inspection in the same percentage.
The Technician must hold certifications for EC, RFEC, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the
additional UT for General Corrosion only.
start of work as a minimum with best practice dictating that the Technician and
Instrument be qualified to work by demonstration examination.
INTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION
240
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
4 UT readings on each header box, 1 reading on 50% of nozzles (Min. of 1 outlet
Low Int Cor Risk- Half Life Not Governing. Non Intrusive
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC23
240
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
INSPECTION INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
Task Type ID
DESRIPTION
LOGIC CASE
(months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT examination that conform to ASNT
SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
o Corrosion Rate
LC231
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area
including CML locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the
damage mechanism it was intended to find.
5 Internal Corrosion Strategy Rule Set for Piping (Appendix E)
Internal Corrosion Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix given in Fig 1
of this document. Table 1 below provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and minimum confidences by
risk level (Inspection Priority). Table 2 provides a list of the Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work for general or localized
internal corrosion with predictable locations for each minimum Inspection Confidence level. Table 3 provides a list of the
Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work for localized or pitting internal corrosion which is not predictable for each
minimum Inspection Confidence level.
Table 2 – Piping Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence- General or Localized Predictable Internal Corrosion
Inspection Method and Scope Options for General and Predictable Localized
Confidence
Very – High N/A
High Inspect a minimum of 50% of the assigned CML’s locations. Assigned CML’s are defined by a
combination of:
Inspection/Failure History – First assign to all locations with known corrosion problems and or
failures regardless of access requirements.
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 50% of all tees, elbows, changes of direction, and
straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow access, should be
avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping its diameter is 10”
or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT, then discount the “Confidence” one
(1) level.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT or UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Medium Inspect a minimum of 25% of the assigned CML’s locations. If CML’s have not been previously
defined then locations should be determined by a combination of:
Inspection/Failure History – First assign to all locations with known corrosion problems and or
failures regardless of access requirements.
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 25% of all tees, elbows, changes of direction, and
straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow access, should be
avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping its diameter is 10”
or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT, then discount the “Confidence” one
(1) level.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT or UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Low Inspect a minimum of 10% of the assigned CML’s locations. If CML’s have not been previously
defined then locations should be determined by a combination of:
Inspection/Failure History – First assign to all locations with known corrosion problems and or
failures regardless of access requirements.
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 10% of all tees, elbows, changes of direction, and
straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow access, should be
avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping its diameter is 10”
or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT, then discount the “Confidence” one
(1) level.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT or UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Table 3 – Piping Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence- Pitting or Localized Unpredictable Internal Corrosion
Confidence Method and Scope Options for Unpredictable Localized and Pitting Corrosion
Very – High N/A
High Inspect a minimum of 100% of the assigned CML’s locations. If CML’s have not been previously
defined then locations should be determined by a combination of:
Inspection/Failure History – First assign to all locations with known corrosion problems and or
failures regardless of access requirements.
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 100% of all tees, elbows, changes of direction, and
straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow access, should be
avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping its diameter is 10”
or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or Smart Pigging.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT or UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Inspection/Failure History – First assign to all locations with known corrosion problems and or
failures regardless of access requirements.
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 50% of all tees, elbows, changes of direction, and
straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow access, should be
avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping its diameter is 10”
or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or Smart Pigging.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT or UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Low Inspect a minimum of 25% of the assigned CML’s locations. If CML’s have not been previously
defined then locations should be determined by a combination of:
Inspection/Failure History – First assign to all locations with known corrosion problems and or
failures regardless of access requirements.
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 25% of all tees, elbows, changes of direction, and
straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow access, should be
avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping its diameter is 10”
or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or Smart Pigging.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT or UT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML
locations and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Internal Corrosion
for Piping
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
LC24
36
Smart Pigging.
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
problems or failures.
RADIOGRAPHIC TESTING
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
LC241
Smart Pigging.
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC25
60
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC251
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Turbulent Flow Areas – Then assign to 100% of all tees, elbows, changes
of direction, and straight run mid points.
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
RADIOGRAPHIC TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
LC26
60
Smart Pigging.
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
RADIOGRAPHIC TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
LC261
Smart Pigging.
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC27
84
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC271
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
problems or failures.
RADIOGRAPHIC TESTING
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
Smart Pigging.
LC28
84
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
Smart Pigging.
LC281
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
problems or failures.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC29
120
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
problems or failures.
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC291
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Every injection point CML shall be defined per API-570 and inspected.
Access requirements need to be considered as part of the assignment
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
problems or failures.
RADIOGRAPHIC TESTING
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
Smart Pigging.
LC30
120
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External Shear wave UT, Phased Array or
Smart Pigging.
LC301
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
process.
Locations that require external support, such as scaffolding to allow
access, should be avoided unless the location is one with known corrosion
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS TESTING
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC31
160
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
problems or failures.
Recommend using Profile RT as the primary method for monitoring when piping
its diameter is 10” or less, otherwise use External UT. If UT is used in place of RT,
then discount the “Confidence” one (1) level.
LC311
External Degradation and CUI Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix
given in Fig 1 of this document. External Degradation inspection is accomplished in two parts. One is for all equipment,
insulated or not, and that recommended technique is external visual inspection. The other part is only for insulated
equipment and the recommended techniques are stripping of insulation accompanied by external visual inspection and/or
using NDT such as RT to look at the surface. These two inspections/parts are separate events and this appendix provides
strategy rules for both. Table 1 below provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and minimum
confidences by risk level (Inspection Priority) for both external visual inspection and the CUI inspection. Table 2 provides a
list of the Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work for external visual inspection for both insulated and non-insulated
equipment. Table 3 provides a list of the Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work for CUI inspection for each minimum
Inspection Confidence level.
Table 2 – Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence- External Inspection Pressure Vessels, Tanks, & Piping
Inspection Method and Scope Options for insulated and non-insulated
Confidence
Very – High/ 100% External Visual of the entire outer surface noting any discontinuities. Per API 510, external
Medium inspections are performed to check the condition of:
The outside surface of the vessel,
Insulation systems,
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to attach
components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any signs of leakage
should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally, weep holes in reinforcing
plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage as well as to prevent pressure build-
up behind the reinforcing plate.
If the Pressure Vessel, Tank, or Piping is insulated, please make certain to note the number of:
barrier penetrations
termination of insulation
damaged insulation
insulation support rings
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API
510, 570, or 653. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API
510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to
ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API
510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to
ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API
510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to
ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Insulation
Half Life < 5yrs Half Life < 5yrs
10yrs 10yrs 10yrs 15yrs 15yrs Damage?
LC32 LC321 LC33 LC34 LC35 LC351 LC36 LC37 LC38 LC381 LC39 LC40 LC41 LC411 LC42 LC421
Page 74 of 161
Recommended Inspection Scope
100% External Visual of the entire outer surface noting any discontinuities. Per API 510,
external inspections are performed to check the condition of:
The outside surface of the vessel,
Insulation systems,
Painting and coating systems,
Supports and associated structure;
and to check for:
Leakage,
Hot spots,
Vibration,
The allowance for expansion and the general alignment of the vessel on
Strategy for High Risk – Non-Insulated – Half Life Not Governing
its supports.
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
EXTERNAL VISUAL - NON-INSULATED ASSET
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
as well as to prevent pressure build-up behind the reinforcing plate.
If the Pressure Vessel, Tank, or Piping is insulated, please make certain to note the
number of:
barrier penetrations
termination of insulation
damaged insulation
LC32
60
INSULATED
Calculated
Governing
EXTERNAL
– Half- Life
ASSET
data.
Insulation systems,
VISUAL
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
60
Governing
Insulated
barrier penetrations
LC331
60
termination of insulation,
damaged insulation,
insulation support rings,
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
If damage is found, continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no
further damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT
examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior
to the start of work.
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
CUI –
High Risk –
Calculated
Governing
remaining
from NDE
Half Life
half life
LC341
data.
barrier penetrations
termination of insulation,
damaged insulation,
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
If damage is found, continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no
further damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT
examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior
to the start of work.
The inspection should return the following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its
location and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a
percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage
mechanism it was intended to find.
its supports.
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
EXTERNAL VISUAL - NON-INSULATED ASSET
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
as well as to prevent pressure build-up behind the reinforcing plate.
If the Pressure Vessel, Tank, or Piping is insulated, please make certain to note the
number of:
barrier penetrations
termination of insulation
damaged insulation
LC35
120
half
life from NDE
Strategy for
INSULATED
Half Life
Insulated
– Non-
ASSET
remaining
data.
Insulation systems,
VISUAL
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
its supports.
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
120
barrier penetrations
LC361
120
termination of insulation,
damaged insulation,
insulation support rings,
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
If damage is found, continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no
further damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT
examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior
to the start of work.
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
remaining half
life from NDE
CUI –
Strategy for
barrier penetrations
LC371
data.
termination of insulation,
damaged insulation,
insulation support rings,
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
If damage is found, continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no
further damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT
examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior
to the start of work.
its supports.
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
EXTERNAL VISUAL - NON-INSULATED ASSET
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
as well as to prevent pressure build-up behind the reinforcing plate.
If the Pressure Vessel, Tank, or Piping is insulated, please make certain to note the
number of:
barrier penetrations
termination of insulation
damaged insulation
LC38
180
INSULATED
Calculated
Governing
EXTERNAL
– Half- Life
ASSET
data.
Insulation systems,
VISUAL
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
180
CUI –
Med Risk –
larger than 10” diameter and smaller penetrations that are not properly
180
sealed,
termination of insulation,
damaged insulation,
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
Possible – Half
Strategy for
CUI –
Med Risk –
No Entry
Half Life
Insulated
LC401
larger than 10” diameter and smaller penetrations that are not properly
sealed,
High
termination of insulation,
damaged insulation,
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
If damage is found continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no
further damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT
examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior
to the start of work.
its supports.
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
EXTERNAL VISUAL - NON-INSULATED ASSET
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
as well as to prevent pressure build-up behind the reinforcing plate.
If the Pressure Vessel, Tank, or Piping is insulated, please make certain to note the
number of:
barrier penetrations
termination of insulation
damaged insulation
LC41
240
INSULATED
ASSET
data.
Insulation systems,
VISUAL
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to
attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects. Any
signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally,
weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage
EXTERNAL VISUAL - INSULATED ASSET
240
Task Type ID
Description
Inspection
Logic Case
Interval
Recommended Inspection Scope
Profile RT may be used for piping 10” or less in diameter, otherwise strip and visually
As Required – If external visual inspection identifies a condition that indicates significant
piping only
If damage is found continue stripping likely locations by doubling the percentage until no
CUI is occurring on the vessel.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510, 570, or 653 for the visual inspection or must hold certifications for RT
LC421
examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior
CUI
Environmental Cracking Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix given in
Fig 1 of this document. This strategy covers both internal and external cracking degradation mechanisms. Table 1 below
provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and minimum confidences by risk level (Inspection Priority).
Table 2 provides a list of the Recommended Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work per each minimum Inspection
Confidence level when internal access is possible. Table 2 is also the preferred method and scope for all types of external
cracking. Table 3 provides a list of the Optional Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work per each minimum Inspection
Confidence level when access is not available to the internal surface.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 6,
in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT is
not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 6,
in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT is
not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML locations
and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
Low Use MT or PT to examine 10% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for examination
should include:
pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where
longitudinal welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
pipe supports that a attached by welding,
joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could
be lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 6,
in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 8,
in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT is
not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
Damage Rate
o Corrosion Rate
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML locations
and dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it
was intended to find.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section V,
Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-
1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section V,
Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-
1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section V,
Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-
1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
No No No
Yes
PT or MT PT or MT PT or MT Is Entry
No
No Access? No Access? No Access? Possible? Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < PT or MT
Half Life < 3yrs Half Life < 5yrs Half Life < 5yrs Half Life < 5yrs Half Life < 5yrs Half Life < 5yrs
10yrs 10yrs 10yrs 15yrs Access?
No Yes
No
No No Yes No No No No No
Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Half Life < Half Life <
15yrs 15yrs
LC44 LC441 LC45 LC451 LC46 LC461 LC49 LC491 LC50 LC501 LC51 LC511 LC54 LC541 LC55 LC551 LC56 LC561 LC60 LC601
Yes No Yes
No
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
High Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Not Governing
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC44
36
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
High Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Governing
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
LC441
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
High Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Not Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC45
36
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
High Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Governing
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
LC451
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
LC46
36
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
LC461
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
Med. High Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Not Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC49
60
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
Med. High Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Governing
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
LC491
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
Med. High Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Not Governing
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC50
60
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 100% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
Med. High Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Governing
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
LC501
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conforms to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
LC51
60
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
LC511
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT Shearwave to examine 50% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
Med. Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Not Governing
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC54
120
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT Shearwave to examine 50% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
Med Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Governing
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
LC541
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT Shearwave to examine 50% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
Med Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Not Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC55
120
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT Shearwave to examine 50% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
Med Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Governing
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
LC551
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use MT or PT to examine 25% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
Med Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – PT or MT Access - Half Life Not Governing
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
LC56
120
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
- Damage Rate
- Corrosion Rate
- Damage Extent
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML locations and
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended
to find.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use MT or PT to examine 25% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
Med Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – PT or MT Access - Half Life Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
LC561
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
- Damage Rate
- Corrosion Rate
- Damage Extent
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML locations and
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended
to find.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 25% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
Low Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Not Governing
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC60
180
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 25% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
Low Env Crack Risk- Internal – No Entry Possible – Half Life Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC601
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 25% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
Low Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Not Governing
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC61
180
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use UT shear wave to examine 25% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
Low Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – No PT or MT Access - Half Life Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE TESTING
UT shear wave shall be performed per a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME Section
V, Article V. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 12, in
accordance to the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
LC611
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must hold certifications for UT shear wave examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use MT or PT to examine 10% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
Low Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – PT or MT Access - Half Life Not Governing
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
LC62
180
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
- Damage Rate
- Corrosion Rate
- Damage Extent
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML locations and
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended
to find.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
INTERVAL (Months)
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
Use MT or PT to examine 10% of all potential cracking locations. Location categories for
examination should include:
- pressure-containing welds (category A, B, & D welds), especially tee sections where longitudinal
welds end at circumferential welds and circumferential shell to tubesheet welds,
- if access permits category C welds [weld categories defined by ASME Section VIII],
- where non-pressure components are attached by welding to pressure retaining components,
- tank critical zone welds especially the bottom to shell weld and
- any locations identified by the visual inspection, drawings or Degradation Mechanisms study,
- pipe supports that a attached by welding,
- joint welds on elbows, tees, and bends that have high external tension loading due to lack of
support or where the fluid flow may provide swirling and chloride disposition.
- pipe dead legs and normally closed bypasses where the normal operating temperature could be
Low Env Crack Risk- Internal – Entry Possible – PT or MT Access - Half Life Governing
lower than the process and fall into the correct temperature range for external SCC.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with
ASME Section V, Article 7 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to
be inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides
of all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
MAGNETIC PARTICLE OR PENETRANT TESTING
Appendix 6, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of
LC621
all joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII,
Appendix 8, in accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Method chosen for the inspection may be dictated by the material of construction, for instance MT
is not applicable for austenitic stainless steel materials.
The Inspector must hold certifications for MT or PT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work. The inspection should return the
following minimum information:
- Damage Rate
- Corrosion Rate
- Damage Extent
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area including CML locations and
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- The total number of the CML’s examined and their descriptions.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended
to find.
8 Corrosion and Cracking Strategy Rule Sets Exchanger Bundles / Tubes (Appendix H)
Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix given in Fig 1 of this document.
This strategy covers both internal corrosion and cracking degradation mechanisms. Table 1 below provides a list of the
recommended inspection frequencies and minimum confidences by risk level (Inspection Priority). Table 2 provides a list of
the Recommended Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work per each minimum Inspection Confidence level. Table 3
provides a list of the Optional Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work per each minimum Inspection Confidence level.
Table 3 will only be used for internal environmental cracking when access is not available to the internal surface.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 8, in
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
If damage is found continue inspecting likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API 510
for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT, ECT, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 8, in
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API 510
for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT, ECT, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further damage
is seen.
Low 100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified problem areas and
tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 25 % of the tubes with follow-up on any indications.
Penetrant Testing (PT) shall be performed to a written procedure that is in accordance with ASME
Section V, Article 6 along with internal visual inspection. Surface prep by cleaning the area to be
inspected in accordance with SSPC-6 at least 1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all
joints to be inspected. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 8, in
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector according to API 510
for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT, ECT, and/or IRIS examination that
conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further damage
is seen.
Table 3 – Inspection Method and Scope vs. Confidence for
Double Pipe Exchanger Inner Pipe
Confidence Method and Scope Options for General Corrosion and Cracking
Very – High N/A
High 100% Visual Examination of the inner tube sealing surface with testing (ECT, IRIS) performed
on the inner pipe straight runs followed by profile RT of the return bend/s and inlet nozzles
with calculated exposure time set to reveal the inner tube only.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for RT, ECT,
and IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be
verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for RT, ECT,
and IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need to be
verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A.
These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life < Half Life <
Half Life < 5yrs Half Life < 5yrs
7.5yrs 7.5yrs 10yrs 10yrs 15yrs 15yrs
LC65 LC651 LC66 LC661 LC67 LC671 LC68 LC681 LC69 LC691 L70 LC701 LC71 LC711 LC72 LC721
HEAT EXCHANGER BUNDLE AND AIR COOLED EXCHANGER TUBES STRATEGY DETAILS
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 100 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
LC65
60
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 100 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
LC651
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
0
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the inner tube sealing surface with testing (ECT, IRIS)
performed on the inner pipe straight runs followed by profile RT of the return bend/s
and inlet nozzles with calculated exposure time set to reveal the inner tube only.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
Med. High Cor. Risk- Bundle - Half Life Not Governing
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for RT,
ECT, and IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
60
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the inner tube sealing surface with testing (ECT, IRIS)
performed on the inner pipe straight runs followed by profile RT of the return bend/s
and inlet nozzles with calculated exposure time set to reveal the inner tube only.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for RT,
Med. High Cor. Risk- Bundle - Half Life Governing
ECT, and IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 50 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
1 inch beyond the heat affected zone on both sides of all joints to be inspected.
Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Appendix 8, in
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
LC67
90
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until
no further damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 50 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
LC671
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until
no further damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the inner tube sealing surface with testing (ECT, IRIS)
performed on the inner pipe straight runs followed by profile RT of the inlet nozzles
with calculated exposure time set to reveal the inner tube only.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
Med. Cor. Risk- Bundle - Half Life Not Governing
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for RT,
ECT, and IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
tube-sheet locations and dimensions, distance from the tube-sheet to the indication,
90
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the inner tube sealing surface with testing (ECT, IRIS)
performed on the inner pipe straight runs followed by profile RT of the inlet nozzles
with calculated exposure time set to reveal the inner tube only.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for RT,
Med. Cor. Risk- Bundle - Half Life Governing
ECT, and IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials need
to be verified prior to the start of work.
tube-sheet locations and dimensions, distance from the tube-sheet to the indication,
0
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 25 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
LC69
120
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until
no further damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 25 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
LC691
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until
no further damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
Profile RT on the inner pipe straight runs with calculated exposure time set to reveal
the inner tube only.
Low Cor. Risk- Bundle - Half Life Not Governing
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
120
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
Profile RT on the inner pipe straight runs with calculated exposure time set to reveal
the inner tube only.
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
Low Cor. Risk- Bundle - Half Life Governing
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
0
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 25 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
LC71
160
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until
no further damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
100% Visual Examination of the tube sheets with PT examination of the identified
problem areas and tube testing (ECT, IRIS) on 25 % of the tubes with follow-up on
any indications.
accordance with the applicable construction code, or in accordance with Owner User
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
specifications.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Pressure Vessel, Piping, or Tank Inspector
according to API 510 for the visual inspection and/or must hold certifications for PT,
ECT, and/or IRIS examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These credentials
need to be verified prior to the start of work.
LC711
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until
no further damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
Profile RT on the inner pipe straight runs with calculated exposure time set to reveal
the inner tube only.
High Risk for Tank Bottoms – Half Life Not Governing
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
160
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
Profile RT on the inner pipe straight runs with calculated exposure time set to reveal
the inner tube only.
High Risk for Tank Bottoms – Half Life Governing
The Inspector must hold certifications for RT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
EXCHANGER BUNDLE/TUBE INSPECTION
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
0
dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
9 Plate Corrosion and Weld Cracking Strategy Rule Sets for Storage Tank Bottoms (Appendix I)
The Combined Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix given in Fig 1 of
this document. Table 1 below provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and minimum confidences by risk
level (Inspection Priority). Table 2 provides a list of the Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work per each minimum
Inspection confidence level.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual
inspection and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual
inspection and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Medium 100% Floor Scan with 25% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The25% will include as a minimum
the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to be
obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual
inspection and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-
TC-1A. These credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
Low N/A
Plate Corrosion and Weld Cracking Strategy
Rule Sets for Storage Tank Bottoms
Half Life < 5 yrs Half Life < Half Life <
LC76
10yrs 15yrs
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Floor Scan with 100% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The 100% will include as a
minimum the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to
be obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
Med. High Risk for Tank Bottoms – Half Life Not Governing
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual inspection
and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC73
Damage Extent
60
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Floor Scan with 100% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The 100% will include as a
minimum the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to
be obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
Med. High Risk for Tank Bottoms – Half Life Governing
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual inspection
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC731
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Floor Scan with 50% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The 50% will include as a minimum
the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to be
obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
Med. Risk for Tank Bottoms – Half Life Not Governing
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual inspection
and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC74
120
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Floor Scan with 50% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The50% will include as a minimum
the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to be
obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
Med. Risk for Tank Bottoms – Half Life Governing
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual inspection
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
o Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC741
Damage Extent
o Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and
dimensions
Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
o Enough to repeat it.
Inspection Extent
o Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
Inspection Confidence
o A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism
it was intended to find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
100% Floor Scan with 25% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The25% will include as a minimum
Low Risk for Tank Bottoms – No Evidence of Cracking or Plate Corrosion
the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to be
obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual inspection
and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
- Damage Rate
- Corrosion/Pitting Rate
LC75
180
- Damage Extent
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended to
find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
INSPECTION
LOGIC CASE
INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
100% Floor Scan with 25% Vacuum Box Testing of all weld seams. The25% will include as a minimum
the entire shell to floor circumferential seam with the balance of the percentage specified to be
obtained from welds in the critical zone (12 to 18 inches from the shell) and any other weld
discontinuities visually observed.
Calculated remaining half life from NDE data.
The Inspector must be an API Authorized Tank Inspector according to API 653 for the visual inspection
and/or must hold certifications for MFL and LT examination that conform to ASNT SNT-TC-1A. These
credentials need to be verified prior to the start of work.
- Damage Rate
LC751
LC751
- Corrosion/Pitting Rate
- Damage Extent
- Was damage found? - Good description of the damaged area and its location and dimensions
- Proper documentation of the inspection technique used
- Enough to repeat it.
- Inspection Extent
- Good description of the total amount of the asset examined as a percentage.
- Inspection Confidence
- A gradation on how likely the inspection performed found the damage mechanism it was intended to
find.
If damage is found, continue testing likely locations by doubling the percentage until no further
damage is seen.
LC76
LC76
N/A
N/A
No Inspection Required
10 PRD Strategies
Internal Corrosion Inspection Priority Categories referenced in the Tables below are based on the Risk Matrix given in Fig 1
of this document. Table 1 below provides a list of the recommended inspection frequencies and minimum confidences by
risk level (Inspection Priority). Table 2 provides a list of the Inspection Methods and Scopes of Work for each minimum
Inspection Confidence level.
o
o
o
*
PRD Strategies
Internal Corrosion Internal Corrosion Internal Corrosion Internal Corrosion Internal Corrosion
Inspection Priority No Inspection Priority No Inspection Priority Inspection Priority No Inspection Priority
1 - 12 13 - 19 20 - 25 1 - 19 20 - 25
*
*
INSPECTION INTERVAL
RECOMMENDED
LOGIC CASE ID
DESCRIPTION
Task Type ID
LOGIC CASE
(Months)
RECOMMENDED INSPECTION SCOPE
A bench test should be performed on the PRV in the as received condition from the unit and the
POP TEST W/ VISUAL
initial leak pressure opening pressure and the reseat pressure Should be documented. The inlet
and outlet piping should be examined for signs of excessive plugging or fouling.
INSPECTION
PSV01
PSV01
A bench test should be performed, however, the PRD should cleaned or steamed out prior to the
POP TEST W/ VISUAL
bench test. Additionally, a visual inspection should be performed with detailed documentation of
the condition of the PRD internal components. An in-place test may be performed using the
INSPECTION
actual process fluid to pressurize the system where permitted by local jurisdiction.
PSV02
PSV02
A visual inspection may be performed without a pop test, with detailed documentation of the
condition of the PRD internal components. An in-place test may be performed where the actual
INSPECTION
VISUAL
process fluid was not used to pressurize the system where permitted by local jurisdiction.
PSV03
PSV03
The rupture disk is removed and visually inspected for damage or deformations.
INSPECTION
RD VISUAL
RD01
RD01
The space between the disk and the PRV is monitored for leakage in accordance with the ASME
Code and API RP 520 Part 2.
INSPECTION
RD VISUAL
RD02
RD02