Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KIAZ18006ENN en
KIAZ18006ENN en
KIAZ18006ENN en
Sparking
firesmart
policies
in the EU
Innovation
Research & Innovation
Projects for Policy
Research and
Innovation
FOREST FIRES — Sparking firesmart policies in the EU
European Commission
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
Directorate I — Climate Action and Resource Efficiency
Unit I.3 — Sustainable Management of Natural Resources
European Commission
B-1049 Brussels
BELGIUM
This publication by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific
output and recommendations expressed do not imply a policy position on the part of the European
Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission
is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.
For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright,
permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
FOREST FIRES
Sparking firesmart
policies in the EU
We would like to thank in particular the following persons for their contribution to this publication: Christofer Anders
Ahlgren, Arya-Marie Ba Trung, Marc Castellnou, Sander Happaerts, Doru-Léonard Irimie, Rose Kelleher, Peter Loffler,
Daniel Nuijten, Denis Peter, Philippe Quevauviller, Eric Rigolot, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Laura Schmidt, Ignacio Seoane,
Monica Sonia and Tamas Szedlak.
FOREWORD
Dear policymakers, practitioners and scientists,
Last year in Portugal and just a couple of months ago Making the wealth of knowledge and the implications
in Greece, we learned at great cost that wildfire risk is of such knowledge available for developing forest fires
an ever present and increasing threat in Europe. Extraor- risk mitigation strategies is a pre-requisite to imple-
dinary in their size, intensity, and severity, 'megafires' menting adequate policies and to better protect the
are challenging the capacities of national wildfire pro- European citizens, the economy and the environment
tection programmes and represent a major concern for against megafires.
the Union. EU solidarity and support are active at all
stages in fire prevention, during the crisis management I hope the recommendations of this report will serve
and in the post-disaster reconstruction. as a call to action and will reinforce the exchange of
information and collaboration within the EU forest fire
Since 1989, the EU has been funding research on forest community.
fires. The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
clearly recognises the strong role that science can play I would like to thank all EU staff and experts who con-
in improving our understanding of wildfire risk and com- tributed to the report with their hard work, dedication
municating on new knowledge and innovation. and enthusiasm.
FOREWORD 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
INTRODUCTION 9
1. Recent forest fire trends in Europe 10
2. Europe in a new wildfire context 11
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 31
1. Support cross-sectoral and multilevel governance to leverage the impact
of public policies on wildfire risk management 32
2. Reinforcing the European Union’s disaster-response capacity 33
3. Supporting proactive prevention operations adapted to local socioeconomic
and environmental contexts 34
4. Integrate fire ecology principles into fire management strategies and policies
to support sustainable forest management 35
5. Improve preparedness through FireSmart governance systems empowered
by local communities 37
ANNEXES 39
Annex I Barriers, incentives and research needs 40
Annex II Future research and innovation programming 46
Annex III List of projects mentioned 46
Policy challenges
Policy recommendations
Linking challenges & recommendations
to wildfire risk-management aspects
Shiing the focus from suppression
to prevention and increasing the
awareness and preparedness of PRE
populations at risk PAR
N ED Promoting effective science-based
TIO NE
forest fire management and risk-
VEN SS
Supporting proactive E informed decision-making
PR
prevention operations HUMAN
adapted to local socioeconomic BEHAVIOUR Integrate fire ecology
and environmental contexts principles into fire
RESEARCH
BIOMASS management strategies
&
MANAGEMENT and policies to support
Developing synergies between EU INNOVATION
sustainable forest
and national policies to improve INTEGRATED management
wildfire risk management FIRE
MANAGEMENT
R E S TO R
SE
ECOSYSTEMS
ON
ON
SP
&
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
RE
AD
TA CLIMATE
TI the rescue capacities of first
ON
Promoting resilient landscapes and responders in crisis management
communities through integrated fire I M PA C T S
management Reinforce the European Union’s
disaster response capacity to better
Improve preparedness through FireSmart governance protect EU citizens
systems empowered by local communities
Innovation
1. RECENT FOREST FIRE TRENDS IN EUROPE
Forest fires (the term used in Europe to designate the the number of fires and in the total burned area has been
unwanted fires burning forests and wild lands; also reported in the countries affected most, except for Portu-
referred to as ‘wildfires’ in this report) are a major hazard gal, since the 1980s (see Figure 1). However, these aver-
throughout Europe, producing large environmental and age values vary greatly from year to year; it has been
economic losses and having an impact on human lives. observed for a given year that the average area burned
Over 40 000 fires per year were reported between 2010 was double or triple that which was burned in the preced-
and 2016 in Greece, Spain, France, Italy and Portugal, ing years. Due inter alia to climate change, analyses of
where most of the burned area is located (approximately European forest fires occurring in the last 30 years show
85 % of the total burned area in Europe). The surface an increase in the length of the fire season, with extreme
affected by fire every year between 2010 and 2017 fire events also occurring in June and October, at the
amounts to 350 000 hectares. A noticeable decrease in edge of the traditional fire season.
FIGURE 1. Average area burned (ha) per year by forest fires over the last several decades
in the five largest countries in southern Europe.
250 000
1980-1989
225 000
1990-1999
200 000
2000-2009
175 000
2010-2016
150 000
125 000
100 000
75 000
50 000
25 000
0
Portugal Spain France Italy Greece
Source: EFFIS.
> Environmental losses: 8.5 million ha burned, approximately 480 000 ha/year.
> Human losses: 611 firefighters and civilians killed, nearly 34 people/year.
> Economic losses: over EUR 54 billion, approximately EUR 3 billion/year. Under rapid economic growth and
increased greenhouse gas emissions, the economic impact for Greece, Spain, France, Italy and Portugal may
increase to over EUR 5 billion/year by 2070-2100.
Sources: European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), EC PESETA II project report.
A long history of human land use, climate variations and ing sizable portions of a whole territory or country. In
associated disturbances such as fire have shaped most Greece, 2018 was the last year in which a series of
European landscapes, in particular the current mosaic- tragic events occurred, starting in the Spanish Levante
like vegetation patterns of Mediterranean ecosystems. in 1994, and then occurring in Portugal (2003, 2005 and
Fire is a natural component driving the evolution and 2017), Spain (2006 and 2017) and Greece (2000 and
adaptation of native plant species in many fire prone 2007), to name some of the worst cases.
ecosystems across Europe. The problem lies in the
changes in fire frequency, size and intensity, to which This new wildfire context is defined by extreme fire
neither ecosystems nor communities are adapted. behaviour characterised by rapid fire spread, intense
Large-scale and more intense wildfires are becoming an burning, long-range fire spotting and unpredictable
increasing concern 1. The occurrence of such extreme shifts. In addition to their serious ecological impact,
wildfire events is determined by two fundamental fac- extreme wildfire events have an extraordinary socio-
tors: the weather conditions and the fire proneness of economic impact in terms of both loss of human life
forested landscapes. In unfavourable meteorological and economic damage. Most damage caused by fires is
conditions such as heatwaves, these extreme wildfire due to extreme wildfire events, which only account for
events, or megafires, may occur in the course of a few about 2 % of the total number of fires.
days, with multiple very large fires simultaneously burn-
1 Tedim, F. et al. (2018), ‘Defining extreme wildfire events: difficulties, challenges, and impacts’, Fire, Vol. 1, No 1, p. 9.
The trend in recurring and tragic fire seasons in Europe which account for the socioeconomic, climate and envi-
reflects the limits of conventional wildfire and forest ronmental roots of wildfires. This also means shifting
management strategies and programmes in efficiently the focus from suppression to prevention within the
addressing the phenomenon. Progress has been made framework of integrated fire management and increas-
to date at different levels, including the revision of ing the awareness and preparedness of popula-
national forest programmes, the development of criteria tions at risk. Addressing the new context of wildfires in
and indicators of sustainable forest management and Europe will therefore imply strengthening European
voluntary codes of best practice. However, the growing cooperation on forest fire risk management through
number of extreme wildfire events indicates that con- effective synergies between EU and national policy
temporary land-management strategies need to objectives and territorial governance. As a result,
account for the disturbance regimes and ecosystem more balanced and sustainable forest management 2
types that define fire prone landscapes. This new con- strategies that integrate prevention, climate adaptation,
text calls for more effective science-based forest fire education, preparedness, suppression and restoration
management and risk-informed decision-making aspects could be implemented.
2 Sustainable forest management is ‘the stewardship and use of forest lands in a way, and at a rate, that maintains their biodiversity, productivity,
regeneration capacity, vitality and their potential to fulfil, now and in the future, relevant ecological, economic and social functions, at local, national
and global levels, and that does not cause damage to other ecosystems’. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. Resolution
H1 of Helsinki (1993).
Innovation
EU Research & Innovation (R & I) has played and con- A recent scientific review of EU R & I projects contrib-
tinues to play a key role in identifying and addressing uted to identifying some of the main policy challenges
these policy challenges by opening avenues for sustain- related to forest fire risk management and governance,
able change, harnessing misconceptions of the what, which can further be addressed by the relevant EU and
how and why, in favour of evidence-based decision- national policies.
making and management of forest fires in Europe.
Shiing focus from suppression to prevention EU Forest strategy, Common Agricultural Policy
and increasing the awareness and preparedness EU Climate Adaptation Strategy
of population at risk EU Habitats Directive, EU Biodiversity Strategy
Civil Protection
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (rescEU)
Improving firefighting and rescue capacities of
EU Space Policy (Copernicus - EFFIS)
first responders in crisis management
> Land, aerial and space detection. In extreme level are needed for enhancing international fire-
weather conditions a fire start can rapidly develop into fighting assistance.
a large and intense wildfire with catastrophic effects. > Fire safety. Safety is a key issue for all involved in
Timely and accurate detection requires the integration fire management. Research has been dedicated to
of fire behaviour and forest knowledge at strategic the selection of appropriate firefighting protective
and tactical levels. Rapid wildfire detection is there- equipment, but also to the promotion of safety con-
fore fundamental to coordinating and performing cerns for current and potential vulnerable areas (e.g.
a quicker and stronger initial attack. in the WUI) and groups such as tourists. Awareness
> Firefighting techniques and technological tools. campaigns focusing on fire safety, but also on the
The increasing intensity of wildfires, together with the optimisation of operations — such as firefighters’
increased concern about fire safety and costs, requires equipment and the use of forest roads for evacua-
better strategies and tactics for firefighting. There is tion and for safe firefighting — are all part of the fire
a strong need for professional development in fire- safety issue. The major challenges for dealing with
fighting and the promotion of safety practices for this aspect of fire suppression lie in the risk associ-
firefighters in order to face extreme wildfire events in ated with wrong decisions that can expose lives to
Europe. Successful professional development in fire- unnecessary danger. As decision-making relating to
fighting depends on the integration of training and safety concerns is delicate and complex, strong
education, which are aligned with the principles cooperation and the exchange of experiences and
of integrated fire management. Common Incident lessons learned in Europe and worldwide are neces-
Command Systems and common standards on sary in order to be in a position to recommend new
capacity building for emergency training at European options in this area.
Fire regimes are changing almost everywhere as issue in wildfire management. Therefore, the involve-
a result of climate change, and land-cover and land-use ment of multiple organisations in fire management,
change. Although most of the annual burned area is from national to local level, requires the clear defini-
concentrated in the southern countries, northern areas tion of authority, functions, tasks and responsibilities,
such as Scandinavia have also suffered from unprece- together with the effective coordination of their
dented forest fires in the last decade. Challenges of this activities.
magnitude can hardly be managed by individual coun- > Significant shortcomings can be identified in relation
tries. However, national wildfire legislation and policies to the adoption of research results by policies
differ among EU Member States according to varying and operational forest fire management, which
risk exposure and management strategies, political reflects resistance due to vested interests, deeply
leadership and stakeholders’ involvement, but also rooted opinions, fears and traditions, inadequate
because of the different government agencies respon- information dissemination, administration con-
sible for fire risk management. straints and, sometimes, simply resistance to
change. Governance is a key aspect of sustainable
> According to the subsidiarity principle at EU level, the forest fire management. Adequate governance
formulation of forest policies is the responsibility mechanisms can facilitate the integration of science
of the Member States within a clearly defined into operations. Similarly, transparency and openness
framework of established ownership rights and in these governance mechanisms can increase citi-
national and regional laws and regulations for long- zens’ participation and politicians’ accountability,
term planning 3. The EU complements the efforts of opening the way for traditional and local knowledge
its Member States by identifying policy priorities integration.
relating to forest fires in the context of sustainable > Another important policy element relates to the post-
and climate-resilient forest management, providing fire management of burned areas. Whereas in all
financial assistance to forest fire-related activities EU Member States burned areas are protected from
and creating a common European Forest Fire Informa- land-use changes for a number of years after a fire,
tion System (EFFIS) 4. Nevertheless, the coherence immediate and compulsory reforestation is no longer
between EU policies’ objectives with respect to wild- a self-evident requirement. The traditional approach
fire risk management should be improved. It is also for the management of burned areas in the Mediter-
necessary to assess the level of complementarity or ranean region has been based on reforestation with
coincidence between those policies and the national conifers since the 19th century. Nowadays the range
legislative frameworks defining the structural meas- of alternatives is much wider (e.g. natural regenera-
ures and operational activities regarding forests’ and tion or passive restoration; assisted restoration
communities’ protection from fire. through appropriate silvicultural techniques to support
> At the national and subnational levels, territorial poli- natural regeneration; active restoration through active
cies have a role to play in solving the wildfire problem seeding or plantation; and finally conversion to other
at the prevention and propagation stages, but also in non-forest uses). Yet the post-fire restoration methods
raising risk awareness, notably in metropolitan, rural currently implemented in Europe do not always take
and wildland-urban interface areas. Significant differ- into account the fire ecology of affected forest and
ences exist between Member States in regard to the vegetation types.
degree of centralisation of forest fire management > The ecological role of fire and its controlled use
and the type of agency to which the various fire man- to achieve management objectives (e.g. ecological
agement responsibilities are assigned. The influence succession, wildlife and livestock pasture improve-
of the multilevel governance structure is a key ment, fuel reduction and wildfire suppression) is only
3 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/fpolicies.htm
4 EFFIS complements national databases and aims to provide EU level assessments of situations before and after fires, to support fire prevention
through risk mapping, and to promote preparedness, firefighting and post-fire evaluations. http://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Integrated fire management builds upon a combination > Holistic approach. Wildfires primarily affect the for-
of prevention and suppression strategies stemming estry and ecosystem service sectors, but agricultural
from social, economic, cultural and ecological evalua- and energy production, public health and tourism may
tions. Beyond the sole consideration of fire prevention also be impacted, causing damage to property and
and fire suppression, integrated fire management links loss of life. The challenge is to develop integrated
5 Carreiras, M. et al. (2014), ‘Comparative analysis of policies to deal with wildfire risk’, Land Degradation & Development, Vol. 25, No 1, pp. 92-103.
6 Montiel-Molina, C. (2013), ‘Comparative assessment of wildland fire legislation and policies in the EU: towards a fire framework directive’. Forest
Policy and Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 1-6.
N PR
IO EP
ENT AR
EV E
DN
PR
HUMAN
ES
BEHAVIOUR
S
RESEARCH
BIOMASS
&
MANAGEMENT
INNOVATION
FIGURE 3. The approach of integrated fire
INTEGRATED
management considers each step of the
R E S T O R AT I O
FIRE
MANAGEMENT management cycle and brings together the
URBAN & LAND EMERGENCY human, physical and ecological elements with
PLANNING MANAGEMENT an impact on the risk management process.
N&
SE
ECOSYSTEMS
ON
AD
SP
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
AP
RE
TA
O CLIMATE
TI
I M PA C T S
Innovation
21
This chapter focuses on the project portfolio analysis of the
R & I projects dealing with forest fire risk management or
governance.
The section highlights the trends, major achievements and
added value of EU-funded forest fire research. In addition,
the barriers, incentives and future research needs are further
described. The section is a summary of a more comprehensive
review report produced by a group of scientific experts. All
projects mentioned in this report are listed in Annex III.
1. EU RESEARCH EFFORTS
The number of projects focusing on forest fires and Triggered by a sharp increase in the number and scale
associated funding has been increasing since the begin- of forest fires, associated with socioeconomic changes,
ning of the EU Research Framework Programmes. Inter- climate change and the difficulties of forest- and fire
est in investigations into forest fires in the southern management policies of addressing this new context,
Member States of the EU has been steadily building the research efforts concentrated on the driving factors
and has been continuously supported by national fund- of fire risk, fire behaviour and its effects and fire sup-
ing sources and the various EU funding schemes at pression methods. Through the results of this research,
multiple levels (large or small research projects, individ- it soon became evident that forest fires constitute
ual fellowships, science and technology networks, etc.). a significant management challenge because they are
influenced by many complex and interacting ecological,
European forest fire research started slowly in the social, economic and political factors. As illustrated by
1960s and 1970s, concentrating on the ecological role the wealth of information on forest fire-related science
of fire, with the first research projects on forest fires produced in the last few decades, i.e. 400 scientific
associated with programmes relating to environmental publications produced each year by Greece, Spain,
protection and forests. Its significant development was France, Italy and Portugal, European research has
only made possible by the creation of the EU research greatly contributed to advancing our scientific under-
FPs, the main funding instruments for science and tech- standing of the fire phenomenon. The EU has become
nology policies. The first multinational programmes, the second-largest producer of forest fire publications
STEP 7 and EPOCH 8, were instrumental in starting worldwide, with the United States being at the forefront
pan-European forest fire research, with an initial focus of forest fire research and innovation.
on technologies such as fire modelling and automatic
fire detection. More work followed under the Fourth
Framework Programme (1994-1998), with projects
addressing the impact of wildfires and the ecological
role of fire.
EU-funded projects relating to forest fires were Regarding the participating institutions, a greater partic-
reviewed, most of them funded by the ongoing Horizon ipation of higher-education and research institutions was
2020 and the last two Framework Programmes (i.e. FP6 observed with a balanced representation among
and FP7). In total, 56 projects were reviewed. The type EU Member States. Several projects involved small
of project varied from large-scale integrated projects and medium-sized enterprises (e.g. FIRELI, SCODEV) to
(e.g. FIREPARADOX, FUME) to smaller projects and indi- bring innovative forest fire equipment and technologies
vidual Marie Skłodowska-Curie grants (e.g. FIRESCAPE, to the market. EU funding also targeted coordination
GRADIENT). Other research projects which emphasised actions between research institutions (e.g. PHOENIX,
the demonstration of effective forest fire management FORESTERRA) and cooperation actions among neighbour-
were funded under the LIFE programme (e.g. ENERBIO- ing countries (e.g. HOLISTIC) (see Annex I for a complete
SCRUB, MONTSERRAT) or under the Civil Protection list of projects). The total EU contribution to the projects
Mechanism (e.g. PREDICATE, WUIWATCH). reviewed amounted to EUR 103.2 million (see Table 1).
TABLE 1. Sources of EU funding and corresponding investments for the 56 forest fire research
projects under review.
Total 56 103.2
In general, most projects concentrated on research in eral; historical fire spatial and temporal patterns; social
Europe, particularly around the Mediterranean Basin, aspects; and climate change. ‘Fire prevention’ projects
including other non-EU countries from this area, but investigated issues relating to fire meteorology and fire
research was also carried out in other parts of the world. danger rating; fuel management and adaptation meas-
The involvement of other non-EU researchers made it ures, including prescribed burning, and use of biomass;
possible to benefit from views from elsewhere in preparedness, including risk assessment to support
a cross-fertilisation experience. early warning, public communication and emergency
response; risk management within interface areas
The projects were divided into six thematic areas corre- (e.g. wildland-urban interface). ‘Fire detection’ projects
sponding to the sequence of forest fire risk-manage- relating to ‘land, aerial and space detection’ focused on
ment activities (see Table 2). ‘Fire science’ projects the rapid location of fire ignition points and rapid fire-
investigated issues relating to fire behaviour modelling, fighting response. ‘Fire suppression’ projects investi-
fuel characterisation and mapping; fire ecology in gen- gated firefighting techniques, from aerial firefighting to
TABLE 2. The six thematic areas considered for assessing the contribution of research projects
to forest fire risk management. Thematic areas are further subdivided into specific topic areas.
Fire meteorology
& fire danger rating
Fire suppression
Firefighting techniques
Preparedness
EU R & I has stimulated advances in fire knowledge, oper- the combined risks of changes in fire regimes and cli-
ational management and decision-support mechanisms mate have great potential to alter plant charac-
while enhancing cooperation between the key actors. teristics (e.g. increase in flammability) as well as
ecosystem dynamics (e.g. shifts in the dominant veg-
Advancing our scientific understanding etation), through altering the balance of species and
reducing post-fire regeneration. Such shifts in vegeta-
European countries have made a significant effort to tion dominance (e.g. from Pinus to Quercus species)
reduce forest fire risk. Investing in research has resulted in may occur as a result of one or consecutive fires
significant advances towards understanding the social, owing to past management practices. Moreover,
ecological and technical aspects relating to forest fire severe droughts can impair the balance of species
detection, response and suppression, prevention and post- and reduce the recovery of the vegetation after fire.
fire restoration. Scientific progress in the field of forest fire These results are readily usable by forest managers to
risk has contributed to the facilitation and stimulation of have an a priori vulnerability assessment of how the
innovations, new management and the adoption of meas- ecosystem will respond after a fire occurs and to
ures, as well as a better understanding of the risk itself. develop a climate-adaptation plan to enhance their
forests’ resilience to climate change.
> For instance, our understanding of how ecosystems > Management actions and deployment of resources to
respond to fire is deemed essential for managing deter fires are planned based on where and how fires
landscapes in a context where fires are prevalent. As occur. It is therefore essential to know how forest
highlighted in the FUME, FIRESCAPE and FILE projects, fires are changing in time and space in order to
The practice of fire management in southern Europe FIGURE 5. Pre-fire analysis of fire spread
does not always make full use of the innovations deliv- in the National Park of Vesuvio, Campania
ered by scientific projects. Specific efforts should be Region (Italy) on 20 July 2016.
devoted to improving knowledge transfer to practition-
ers and decision-makers. Nonetheless, several exam-
ples from applied research projects demonstrate the
effective uptake of EU R & I findings.
Network building and establishing a cooperation Fostering mutual learning and harmonisation
framework
Comparing trends between similar EU Member States
The network of research institutions established through has made it possible to identify differences in how they
the PHOENIX Project Centre, created within the frame- are being affected by fires nowadays and calls for
work of the European Forest Institute and the COST a deeper understanding of the underlying causes of
action FP0701 ‘Post-fire management in southern such differing tendencies. The ARCFUEL project
Europe’, was instrumental in bringing together research designed a methodology to produce harmonised and
efforts while providing an updated scientific baseline for standardised fuel-classification maps for the whole
developing post-fire management strategies and tech- Mediterranean region, using ‘readily available’ spatial
nical recommendations to forest managers in southern data sets for the Mediterranean region (JRC forest-type
Europe. The funding provided by COST actions helps and fuel-type maps, multi-temporal Landsat Thematic
thousands of European scientists to cooperate in com- Mapper (TM) images). The methodology was first
mon research projects and to amplify the impact of applied in Greece and Portugal at national level and
research carried out within and beyond the EU Member further used in Spain and Italy at regional level.
States.
Transferability of fire management tools
Increased excellence and capacity building and approaches
A significant proportion of the investment in EU forest In spite of the recognised differences in conditions in the
fire research is for the collective public good and has different countries and regions and because of the fruit-
resulted, for instance, in enhancing the European knowl- ful exchanges between partners, most of the products
edge base, or in marketing technologies, which would and knowledge delivered by research projects can be
not have been financed by the private sector alone. For transferable and applicable to other fire prone areas.
example, the AF3 project received EUR 12.9 million to For instance, the SPITFIRE project has contributed
develop, as part of its emergency-response system, to improving information exchange on meteorology
a Low Power Wireless Ground Sensor Network that pro- and forest fire risk in the border area between Spain
vides early detection and near-real-time monitoring and Portugal through the identification, design and
capabilities of forest fires.
The review identified significant shortcomings in the The practice of fire management in Europe is therefore
uptake of research findings by related policies and man- not making full use of the knowledge and innovation
agement approaches. A comprehensive overview of the delivered by scientific projects. Specific efforts should
barriers, incentives and associated research needs by be devoted to improving the transfer of knowledge to
thematic area is presented in Annex I. According to practitioners and decision-makers, while avoiding
experts in the field, this lack of dissemination and a purely reactive approach to decision-making when
exchange between the key stakeholders involved in for- planning investments and communication activities. In
est fire management resulted in: addition, greater emphasis should be placed on funding
R & I actions which encompass the full forest fire man-
> relatively little change in the emphasis put on fire sup- agement cycle. A set of recommendations for future
pression versus fire prevention in territorial policies; R & I programming is detailed in Annex II.
> a low level of adoption by practitioners of the concept
of integrated fire management through the recogni-
tion of fire ecology principles as a key component of
the management of ecosystems;
> a relatively low level of adoption of innovative fire
suppression technologies and fire prevention
approaches in some countries;
> very limited integration and application, in training and
in practice, of the knowledge on preventive forest fire
management in the context of land use and climate
change.
Innovation
This section proposes concrete recommendations for
addressing identified current policy challenges based
on the conclusions from recent R & I projects funded
under various EU Framework Programmes. More
information on the evidence and concrete results behind
the recommendations can be found on the project websites.
Policy challenge
Developing synergies between EU and national policies
to improve wildfire risk management
There are often multiple and complex interactions > Increase the level of coherence between public
between public policies influencing wildfire occurrence policy objectives with an impact on wildfire man-
and propagation due to the great interdependency agement. HOLISTIC showed that a cross-sectoral
between forest and/or civil-protection policies with land- approach can bring together spatial planning, rural
use planning, agricultural and rural development, envi- and peri-urban development, forestry, civil-protection,
ronmental, climate and energy policies. These policies energy, climate, environmental and tourism/recrea-
may have important positive or negative effects, which tional policies. It should provide the opportunity
might support or impede the development of forest to do an in-depth study of the structural causes
and/or civil-protection policy programmes. An integral affecting wildfires (rural abandonment, climate
approach to wildfire risk management therefore change, land-management practices, new policy par-
requires the following. adigms and new urban demands), and it also should
give the opportunity to identify the possibilities for
intervention in relation to these (e.g. promotion of
forest ecosystem services’ added value, reduction in
fuel accumulation, forest adaptation to climate
change, etc.). In countries where the responsibility for
wildfire management is shared between the forest
and civil-protection services, a cross-sectoral
‘We can design smart landscapes but we don’t approach is even more necessary in order to guar-
have the governance structures and economic antee an effective collaboration.
engines to make them happen.’ > Improve coordination among EU policies and
national policies on disaster prevention, prepar-
Inazio Martínez de Arano edness and response to different risks. This
European Forest Institute includes the EU forest strategy 9, the Union Civil Pro-
tection Mechanism 10, the EU strategy for adaptation
Policy challenge
Improving the firefighting and rescue capacities
of first responders in crisis management
Wildfire policies adopted by most European countries > Promote the use of new firefighting products or
over the last century have been based on fire exclusion. fire suppression techniques. Innovative ICT solu-
Forest firefighting represents a yearly budget of EUR tions using different ground and aerial detection sys-
2.2 billion for EU governments and public agencies tems based on cameras and sensors can be very
(SMART FIRE BARRIER). In all Euro-Mediterranean coun- useful in detecting fires at an early stage and incor-
tries, the principal aim of wildfire suppression pro- porate that information into networks and systems to
grammes is to ensure a systematic, rapid, hard-hitting assist early deployment and initial attack (FORFIRE,
initial attack on all fire ignitions. National firefighting FIRESENSE). Despite the potential such technologies
capacities rely to a large extent on aerial resources and and methodologies have to reduce costs and increase
can therefore be insufficient in the event that adequate safety and firefighting efficiency, adequate legislation
aerial resources are unavailable or if it is not possible to and regulation are required to allow for their imple-
operate due to extreme weather conditions. The follow- mentation and integration into the Union Civil Protec-
ing recommendations aim at improving the firefighting tion Mechanism and firefighting activities, including
and rescue capacities: training. Solving the issues relating to the standardi-
sation and compatibility of existing forest fire equip-
ment should also be addressed at pan-European level
within a coordinated response scheme.
9 https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/forest/strategy_fr
10 http://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/civil-protection/mechanism_en
11 https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/adaptation/what_en
12 http://fireintuition.efi.int/products/legislation-and-policies.fire
Policy challenge
Shifting the focus from suppression to prevention and increasing
the awareness and preparedness of populations
According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the strategic decision-making is a necessary step for fire ser-
United Nations 14, forest fire prevention may be ‘the most vices and should be supported through an incident com-
cost-effective and efficient mitigation programme an mand system where the operations for civil protection,
agency or community can implement’. Despite such crit- landscape planning and restoration are coordinated. Such
ical importance, prevention programmes suffer limited proactive prevention operations would involve:
budget allocation compared with fire suppression, and
often lack an adaptive legislative framework able to reg- > Developing a centralised, general planning and gov-
ulate fuel management activities, institutionalise ernance framework for fire risk management aimed
pre-season preparedness activities, establish an ear- at ensuring the balance between prevention and
ly-warning system and prohibit potentially dangerous suppression resources, and encourage operations
activities during certain fire seasons. Changing the focus adapted to the local socioeconomic and environ-
from firefighting operations to long-term planning and mental characteristics of each region or locality.
13 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions, Strengthening EU disaster
management: rescEU solidarity with responsibility (COM(2017) 773 final).
14 Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, (2006), ‘Fire management: voluntary guidelines — Principles and strategic actions’,
Fire Management Working Paper, No 17, Rome (also available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/pdf/009/j9255e/j9255e00.pdf)
Policy challenges
Promoting resilient landscapes and communities
through integrated fire management in the EU
Developing synergies between EU and national policies
to improve wildfire risk management
Promoting effective science-based forest fire management
and risk-informed decision-making
The EU Forest Strategy 16, adopted in 2013, establishes Agricultural Policy are the main EU funding instrument
a framework for forest-related actions in support of the for forest-related actions and the implementation of the
protection and sustainable management of forests. Rural Forest Strategy. The rural development policy supports
Development Programmes (RDPs) under the Common sustainable forest management through specific forest
15 Catry, F. X. et al. (2007), ‘Spatial distribution patterns of wildfire ignitions in Portugal’, Wildfire 2007 conference, Seville (Spain).
16 https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/forest/strategy_en
17 San-Miguel-Ayanz J. et al. (2012) Forest Fire Damage in Natura 2000 sites 2000-2012. Executive Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
DOI: 10.2788/77848.
Policy challenges
Shifting the focus from suppression to prevention and
increasing the awareness and preparedness of populations
Promoting effective science-based forest fire management
and risk-informed decision-making
Fire management programmes must be supported by > Make governance mechanisms transparent to
governance mechanisms based on broad social partici- diminish long-standing suspicion about the objectives
pation and diffusion processes, such as learning and and associated impacts of fire-related policies. Peo-
exchange of good practices, in order to be effective. The ple’s risk perception depends on the familiarity of and
interaction of all stakeholders (i.e. local communities, exposure to a threat and strongly influences the
forest owners, fire technicians and local and regional acceptance of the implementation of fire manage-
administrations) in fire networks is therefore essential ment programmes (FIREPARADOX). Increased dia-
for increasing accountability, social awareness and logue between the key stakeholders can increase
understanding of wildfire risk. The following recommen- citizens’ participation and politicians’ accountability.
dations would contribute to address these challenges: Several indications for policymakers were suggested,
Innovation
ANNEX I BARRIERS, INCENTIVES AND RESEARCH NEEDS
A significant number of barriers to the uptake of forest such as fuel maps, which minimise the time, effort and
fire R & I results in EU and national policies and in oper- cost needed to invest in new approaches (e.g. fire behav-
ational fire management have been identified for each iour modelling, fire prevention planning), better training of
of the main topics. In short, these barriers relate to the personnel, availability of funding for investment in new
inadequacies, incompleteness and uncertainties of some tools and technologies, and financial support to those
of the results, which lack maturity and are therefore not participating in initiatives for fire mitigation through mod-
ready for immediate application. They also relate to an ern approaches (e.g. to forest landowners to carry out fuel
existing disconnection between science, policy and man- management).
agement. Country regulations, bureaucratic issues and
organisational culture further add to that. Based on the review of the projects, the following bar-
riers and incentives for each thematic area were identi-
In spite of the obstacles that were identified above, there fied along with their associated future research needs
are some important incentives that have led to the incor- (see hereafter). This information should contribute to
poration of R & I results in practice so far, and are likely the production of strategy documents (e.g. EU Forest
to lead to more uptake in the future. Incentives include Strategy, EU Bioeconomy Strategy and Union Civil Pro-
the existence of significant problems that can benefit tection Mechanism) and to the identification of research
directly from specific knowledge and/or technological priorities in the development of future Framework Pro-
tools, easy availability at usable detail/scale of results, grammes at the EU and national levels.
resources needs better fuel characterisation for all fire prone at operational level requires high-resolution
forecasting and modelling EU regions spatial and temporal data
of fire behaviour at the > Increase the accuracy of wildfire simulations
Wildland-Urban Interface by integrating data on fuel characteristics
and fire ignition
> Improve fire model prediction capacity
in a changing context
> Develop innovative approaches (e.g. LiDAR)
for fuel modelling and mapping
> Limited knowledge on future > Incorporate ecology principles into > Assessment of the variability of species’
ecosystems’ responses to landscape planning and fire regeneration niche across the distribution range
changing climate, fire and management plans more actively, > Need to understand ecosystems’ vulnerability
Fire ecology
land-use conditions within distinguishing between fire dependent and potential to adapt to changes in climate
and beyond fire prone areas and fire sensitive ecosystems and fire regime
prevents efficient ecosystem- > Develop a shared view of priorities > Identify thresholds of change and tipping points
based management for natural stakes (e.g. map of soil in ecosystem regeneration, taking into account
erosion risk) climate trends and past land-use/management
history
> The lack of central databases > Incorporate knowledge on how spatial > Analysis of historical spatio-temporal
with harmonised information and temporal fire patterns shape characteristics of fires is needed to understand
temporal patterns
on single fire events (e.g. data ecosystem resilience in landscape the trends in fire regimes and associated risk
Fire spatial and
population responses to management policy in different regions > Assessing how policies and management
particular fire policies > Educational and awareness campaigns decisions impact fire activity, especially in
> Perceptions of fire risk and explaining the social, environmental the WUI
fire use are often in conflict and economic benefits of a specific > Identification of adaptation and development
among social groups, which management approach (and its pathways which favour fire resilient landscapes
prevents successful associated risks) can foster its > Understanding how social values and attitudes
community-based integrated successful implementation of vulnerable groups in highly hazardous areas
fire management can be addressed by policies
> Applicability of fire models is > Projections of future changes in > Fire risk models based on climate scenarios
Climate change
limited due to uncertainties in fire danger can be used to design need to incorporate other factors such as
climate projections and spatial adaptation plans to mitigate the impact landscape fragmentation, spatial distribution
and temporal resolution issues of climate change on forest fires of ignition and suppression capacities to make
> Adaptation needs can already be them more realistic.
assessed for the next few decades > Ecosystem response to fire under extreme
meteorological conditions is not well known.
climate influence on future to anticipate seasonal fire severity urgent need for new knowledge on how they
Fire meteorology
fire regimes and guide strategic fire prevention are generated, what their consequences and
activities costs (financial, social and environmental)
> Fire danger forecasting should are and what the required mix of firefighting
consider ecosystem functioning to approaches is
design adaptation strategies
> Limited uptake of scientific > Create financial incentives to > Fire risk indices need to be harmonised and
knowledge by policy and encourage ‘fire safe’ development take into account the specificities of EU regions
management actors to in WUI/RUI areas at risk > New approaches for long-term biomass
address fuel management > Promotion of residual forestry biomass management should be developed, taking into
under future climate/land-use exploitation through policy incentives account historical land uses and fire regimes
Fuel management
scenarios targeted at private owners (e.g. > More research is needed on the effects of
> Lack of guidance for fuel- markets for forest biomass residues prescribed burning on forest ecosystems in
management protocols at and other low-value forest products) order to improve operational effectiveness
the EU level, including the use > Foster public support for proactive > New tools based on cost–benefit analyses
of prescribed burning use of prescribed fires to optimise should be developed for the evaluation of fire
> Use of fire as a management biomass reduction prevention practices, including the use of
tool is limited because of biomass for energy.
liability and casualty risks > Develop 3D fire models to test improved design
and little tolerance for of vegetation treatments on fuel breaks
management errors
> Lack of involvement of local > Strengthening the European dimension > Need to improve methods for informing the
stakeholders in prevention of cooperative solutions between general public about the causes and impacts
activities management agencies at the national (financial, social and environmental) of extreme
> Limited awareness of forest level and between regions and wildfire events and which prevention and
Preparedness
local agencies and acceptance communities respect to land-use fragmentation and climate
by the general public of new > Better communication on science- change
fire management approaches based recommendations for disaster- > Develop guidance on the use of fire resistant
> Lack of adequate regulations risk management in the WUI to materials for housing construction in the WUI
on urban development support management actions > Develop innovative firefighting and safety
planning in interface areas > Foster the involvement of local techniques at the WUI
communities in the design and > Provide guidance for best prevention and
planning of prevention actions emergency management
> Adapt safety rules regarding building > Need to assess the effects of improved buffer
materials zone design on mitigating fire impact on assets
> The rate of false alarms in the > Develop multi-agency investigation > Improve the reliability of networks of
detection of fire ignition is high teams to improve knowledge of fire detection systems
> Space detection does not ignition causes > Define standards for the operational
currently meet the requirements of fire detection systems
requirements for the rapid (e.g. minimum size of the fire detected,
detection of fires; in addition delay time, false alarm rate)
the use of drones has
limitations
Post-Fire
Recovery
post-fire management > Promote testing/validation of new vulnerability to various fire recurrences and
Damage and
management actions to avoid would help the adoption of available and climate change
secondary damage in the scientific innovations > Incorporate the landscape dimension into
short term > Stimulate the incorporation of new post-fire restoration projects with a view to
> Guidance for efficient and restoration treatments into improving biodiversity and producing more fire
context-specific restoration management protocols resilient landscapes
planning and design in fire
prone areas
integration of new methods resources and decision-making drone navigation and aeronautic legislation
and tools varies between capacities using reliable estimates of
civil-protection stakeholders firefighting effectiveness
> The market for firefighting > Generalise post-fire reviews to feed
products and associated a lessons-learned information system
training is underdeveloped
and not easily accessible
> Safety laws do not
systematically consider new
firefighting products and
techniques due to liability
issues, for example
> Low degree of acceptance of > Monitor the progress and evaluate > Research should address the long-lasting social
new proposals for evacuation the efficiency of safety measures and health impacts of forest fires to better
strategies or safety measures > Encourage the exchange of good educate vulnerable groups, including firefighters
in general practices on fire prevention, fire safety > Need for updated guidelines or procedures on
> Negative perception of forest and training how citizens should equip themselves for
Fire safety
fires and public objections to > Make substantial efforts to educate emergencies involving extreme fire events
particular land-management the public about the inevitability of
practices (e.g. prescribed fire and its ecological benefits
burning)
> Outdated protocols for fire
safety in relation to risks
emerging from extreme
wildfire events
> Lack of involvement of local > Demonstrate the added value and > Improve predictions of wildfire propagation
stakeholders in prevention applicability of the tools, e.g. simulation and real-time risk analysis by considering the
activities tools for training fire managers variability of wind speed and direction, humidity
Technological tools
> Limited awareness of forest > Promote planning and decision-making and fuel moisture influencing weather forecasts
fire risk among vulnerable tools that are tailored to particular > Improve accuracy in fire detection systems
groups safety, prevention and firefighting and usability of the tools by crisis managers
> Cooperative solutions to needs by using multispectral images with multiple
improve preparedness are > Improve the transferability and uptake time series
hindered by cultural, of tools to ensure up-to-date and > Demonstrate the applicability and multiple
institutional and legislative harmonised guidance for operations benefits of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)
issues > Support the efforts of first-responder
teams in the management of multi-
casualty incidents
> Lack of social and political value chains > Develop and implement adequate and cost-
involvement in the design and > Promote wildfire protection strategies effective detection, prediction and response
implementation of effective that deal effectively with both tools and procedures to respond to extreme
risk governance beneficial fires and detrimental fires wildfire events
> Limited social acceptance > Empower local communities with the > Develop flexible fire management plans and
of new fire and land incentives, tools, information and skills policies that account for the differences in
management practices calls to recognise the benefits of integrated regional contexts across the EU
for better education about fire fire management and to apply it
behaviour and fire ecology > Promote incentive programmes for
> Low profitability of wood- sustainable fuel management such
based products and as payment for ecological services
fragmented ownership prevent > Foster a multi-risk approach in forest
sustainable forest management to account for other
management by private biotic and abiotic disturbances (e.g.
owners insects, wind storms, droughts)
Under Horizon 2020, the ‘programmatic’ responsibilities expansion of the fire prone area towards forested areas
on ‘forest fires’ are shared between SC2 (Section 2.1.4 which have not previously been known to be susceptible
in the specific programme) and SC5 (Section 5.2.3), with to forest fires. This will become one of the major chal-
the latter more from a monitoring and risk-manage- lenges of sustainable forest management in future dec-
ment perspective and the former more from an ecosys- ades, especially in light of efforts to mitigate green-
tem-resilience and restoration perspective. house-gas emissions through forests’ sequestration of
carbon. Implications for forest-adaptation practices will
For the last programming cycle under Horizon 2020, be instrumental in reducing fire proneness.
both SC2 and SC5 have earmarked funding for 2020 for
relevant topics, as follows: With this background in mind, it can be seen that tack-
ling forest fires effectively will require a joint effort at
> SC2: LC-RUR-11-2019-2020: Sustainable wood value regional, national and EU levels, and by employing
chains, B. [2020] resilient forest systems, a variety of policies and funding sources, going well
> SC5: LC-CLA-15-2020: Forest fire risk reduction: beyond R & I policy. Future R & I will contribute to gen-
towards an integrated fire management approach in erating the knowledge, tools, capacity and guidance
the E.U. required to underpin an integrated fire management
strategy that promotes holistic landscape and forest
A sharp gradient exists from southern Europe to northern management and considers interaction among all
Europe, in terms of contributing and causing factors, fire phases of the wildfire management process. The pro-
frequency and area burned, and fire behaviour. Neverthe- motion of the concept of integrated fire management
less, there is growing evidence to suggest that changes and its applications by Member States may be the way
in species’ niche dynamics, due to climate change and forward with a view to tackling the global EU wildfire
anthropogenic intervention, have implications for the problem.
EU PUBLICATIONS
You can download or order free and priced EU publications from EU Bookshop at:
http://bookshop.europa.eu. Multiple copies of free publications may be obtained by
contacting Europe Direct or your local information centre (see https://europa.eu/european-
union/contact_en).