Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Challenges
Challenges
Manufacturing was recorded to grow by 3.7% in the fourth quarter of 2019. The growth was
mainly attributed to the expansion of Food Manufactures (8%), Chemical and Chemical Products
(14.5%).
Challenges
First, manufacturing. The declining manufacturing share reflects the country’s trade
reforms, which lowered the incentives for the sector (and measured its value added
at closer to international prices). It also tells us something about the competitiveness
of tradable goods activities. A proxy indicator of international competitiveness in
manufactures is the country’s share of some key manufactures in global markets. To
illustrate, we choose electronics parts and components, final electronic products,
garments and footwear. These have been the backbone of the successful early-
stage East Asian export-oriented industrialization drives, on the basis of a
other words, the digital divide has exacerbated the country’s pre-existing socio-
economic and spatial inequalities. The Philippine digital economy is unrecognizable from
that of 30 years ago when
Singapore Prime Minister Lee acerbically quipped that “98% of Filipinos are waiting
for a telephone, and the other 2% are waiting for a dial tone.” As noted, the country
has been able to support one of the developing world’s most vibrant and innovative
BPO sectors. But it is underperforming on both efficiency and equity grounds. Table
7 provides some comparisons with other middle-income ASEAN countries. The
Philippines has the lowest internet penetration, well below all but Indonesia. Its fixed
broadband network has limited coverage, is costly and slow compared with all of its
neighbours, except Indonesia. Its mobile network performs better, but still lags
behind ASEAN middle-income best practice. Moreover, these figures do not draw
out the inequality of internet provision, both between households and within the
business sector and between the major corporates and small and medium-sized
enterprises. For instance, the 2019 survey of the Philippine Statistics Authority found
that internet access is 20 percentage points higher in urban than in rural areas. The
difference is even larger—roughly 40 percentage points—between the National
Capital Region (NCR) and the country’s poorest region, the Bangsamoro
Autonomous Region.
The demand for manufacturing products has shown a slight increase during the second half of
2021 in the Philippines, with new orders stabilizing following the continuous decline since the
start of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the country's supply chain has yet to recover at the
same pace as the manufacturing demand, resulting in material shortages that hinder the recent
productions. The Philippines' manufacturing production has currently stood in a declining
position since May 2021, causing industry players to become hesitant in the sector's outlook.
Since August, the orders reduction rate has fallen to a more modest pace due to the rise in
export sales compared to the previous period. In addition, businesses in the Philippines have
been able to hold employments and maintain production despite the freight delays and container
shortages happening in the global supply chain. Firms are now anticipating longer lead times and
purchasing stocks to secure supply as demands recover.
Even though risks and opportunities linger in the Philippines manufacturing sector,
manufacturing players are now emphasizing innovation and digitalization to enhance resiliency.
Technologies can improve supply chain visibility and reliability within the process, considering
the supply chain still stands as a significant pain point for the industry. However, while
digitalization and innovation are important, the Philippines still need to build a strong foundation
on investment regulatory framework to proceed with nationwide digitalization and improve the
investment climate.
An example of how digitalization can revolutionize the Philippines' manufacturing industry is the
Smart Industry Readiness Index (SIRI) program. The SIRI program can act as an effective tool in
catalyzing the digitalization of manufacturing companies by providing objective and
comprehensive evaluation on production facilities, eventually helping companies prioritize which
element to transform digitally. The SIRI program emphasizes the lengthy digital transformation
process that manufacturing companies have to go through. Therefore, a prioritization matrix
from a globally accepted standard can become the benchmark on a step-by-step approach for
companies seeking to shift their operations digitally gradually.
Experts see that the manufacturing industry will face the following key issues:
Embracing new business models may be necessary to adapt to the new normal. For
example, you can transition from being purely product-centric to service-centric using
an “Anything-as-a-Service” (XaaS) model. You may change your selling models from
indirect to direct using digital platforms — or a mix of these models, which nearly
60% of manufacturers have adopted.
Take pharmaceutical companies, for example. Some had develop products that can
help alleviate the impact of the pandemic, resulting in major changes in production
and supply chain operations. Moderna, for one, built new facilities and outsourced
the production of its COVID-19 vaccine. The upshot? Greater complexities.
Compliance complexity is just one of the many pain points of changing gears and
stretching the production and supply chain. You need to ensure that contract
manufacturers also comply with all regulatory requirements. Data management
issues will become more complex as you add more tiers to your value chain.
3. Fiercer competition
The supply war will be fiercer in the next normal due to scarce raw materials and
digital talents.
Recruitment issues
Barbara Morgan, Lubrizol Life Science Health General Manager and CDMO,
told Pharma Manufacturing that talent wars are going on as a result of the
“push for additional capacity.” A NAM survey revealed that almost 50% of
member manufacturers are having trouble hiring the right talent.
Sourcing and Procurement issues
The sudden surge of demand for medical and essential goods during the
pandemic resulted in stockouts and increased competition for raw materials.
In the cell and gene therapy landscape, for example, demand for raw
materials increases as development and trials approach late stages. But
Bryan Gillis, Rubius Therapeutics Vice President of Manufacturing and Head
of the Smithfield, RI site, said several new suppliers will emerge to compete.
Aside from regulatory requirements, the approaches that regulators use constantly
change as well.
When the pandemic ends, the production floor and backend units may not operate in
the same way they used to. Production may become fully automated or a mix of bot
and body to meet new-normal health protocols such as social distancing. Backend
units may be remotely managed by people working from the safety of their homes.
This new-normal arrangement requires a seamless information flow across the entire
value chain. Machine-to-machine, machine-to-human, and human-to-human
communications must be frictionless to ensure higher productivity, uptime, seamless
collaboration, and faster decision and execution. But according to McKinsey, most
companies still employ manual data collection. McKinsey suggests using digital
solutions that allow for automated data collection, which can help remote workers get
insights and manage factory performance in real-time.
This is the “constant normal”: Data will remain king. Dealing with new-normal issues
is easy if you have the right data infrastructure in place. Mareana’s Manufacturing
Data Hub can help you enable a truly data-driven factory that is not only smart but
also adaptive to changes. It enables your factory to automatically reboot, repurpose,
and reinvent operations based on immediate and actual needs. It helps build an
adaptive factory that is pandemic-proof and new-normal-ready.
Contact a data expert to learn how Mareana’s Manufacturing Data Hub can help you
prime your smart factory for the new normal.