Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our products.

This functionality is provided solely for your

convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS
AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY,
ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale Academic OneFile Terms and Conditions and by using the machine
generated PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the
machine generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.

Greens senator attacks Voice referendum as waste of money.

Date: Sept. 1, 2022
From: The Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney, Australia)
Publisher: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited
Document Type: Article
Length: 704 words

Full Text:
Byline: Lisa Visentin

Greens senator Lidia Thorpe has called the Voice to parliament referendum a "waste of money", saying the funds could be better
spent in Indigenous communities, prompting party leader Adam Bandt to stress the party was committed to "good faith" negotiations.

In a significant hardening of her position, the Greens spokeswoman on First Nations issues said she had not decided whether she
would personally support or oppose the Voice, but believed it would be a "wasted exercise".

"The costs involved in a referendum are better spent on what is needed in our communities," Thorpe said. "I think it's a waste of
money. It's a wasted exercise. You don't need a referendum to have a treaty."

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who has committed to a referendum in this term, this week ruled out taking the referendum to a
vote in the first half of next year.

Thorpe's views underscore the challenge confronting the government as it attempts to seek broad support for constitutional
recognition, amid an emerging "no" case advanced by conservative voices such as Coalition senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and
former Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

In order for the referendum to be held, the government will need the Greens support to pass a bill authorising a national vote in the
event the Coalition does not support it. There is significant unease within Coalition ranks about how the Voice would work. Opposition
Leader Peter Dutton has said he has "an open mind" on the proposal, but has also flagged concerns the constitutional change would
give rise to High Court interpretations.

Thorpe and Bandt have been appointed by the party to lead their negotiations with the government on the Voice. The Greens formal
position is to negotiate with Labor to progress all three elements of the Uluru Statement from the Heart - a truth-telling commission, a
treaty with Indigenous people, and the Voice to Parliament, preferring it to happen in that order.

Thorpe, however, did not rule out the Greens ultimately opposing the referendum, saying "we'll have to see". She said Labor would
need to commit to implementing all the recommendations from the 31-year-old Royal Commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody
and the 1997 Bringing them Home inquiry into the Stolen Generations.

"Given we don't even know what this [Voice] looks like or what the [referendum] question is going to be or any of the detail, it's pretty
hard to say whether you can support something you know nothing about," she said.

She also kept open the door to her personally opposing the Voice.

"At the moment it's not looking good, but if they start putting in place recommendations that are going to save our people's lives, then
that could get us over the line," Thorpe said.

A spokesman for Bandt said: "The federal government can make substantial improvements to the lives of First Nations peoples
immediately, as we work to progress all elements of the Uluru Statement."

Thorpe's remarks come ahead of a planned meeting with Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney next week, which Thorpe said
she had initiated and intended to use to talk about deaths in custody.

"This meeting is not about the Voice. The Labor government has never reached out to me to talk to me about the Voice," she said.

Thorpe criticised the lack of detail around the Voice model and Labor's efforts at consultation, saying people she spoke to in
Indigenous communities did not know what the proposal involved.

"I think there's so much mixed messaging coming out here and I honestly don't think Labor know what they're doing and they're just
making it up as they go along."

Burney said the Voice was a "once in a generation opportunity" to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the
Constitution

"I am encouraged by assurances from Greens leader Adam Bandt that the Greens won't stand in the way of progress on a First
Nations Voice to Parliament," she said.

Burney reiterated that the government was seeking the broadest possible consensus for the reform, and she had met with Greens
Indigenous senator Dorinda Cox, Shadow Attorney-General Julian Leeser, Coalition Indigenous senator Kerrynne Liddle and Liberal
backbencher Andrew Bragg. She said she had spoken to Thorpe on the phone.

Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2022 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited

http://www.smh.com.au/
Source Citation (MLA 9th Edition)
"Greens senator attacks Voice referendum as waste of money." Sydney Morning Herald [Sydney, Australia], 1 Sept. 2022, p. 4. Gale
Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A715605763/AONE?u=unimelb&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=909f91e1. Accessed 19
Jan. 2023.
Gale Document Number: GALE|A715605763