Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Virus
Virus
net/publication/342171206
CITATIONS READS
3 209
3 authors, including:
Fahim Shaltout
Benha University
412 PUBLICATIONS 326 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Detection and typing of Clostridium perfringens in some retail chicken meat products View project
Microbiological status of meat and chicken received to University student hostel View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Fahim Shaltout on 15 June 2020.
Table (1) The results of Aerobic Plate Count(cfu/g) in the examined samples of ready to eat meat products
(n=30)
Products Min. Max. Mean± SEM*
Beef burger 0.7×104 12.0×104 3.6×104 ± 0.2×104
Kofta 0.1×105 12.0×104 1.3×105 ± 0.1×105
Sausage 0.5×105 17.0×105 3.4×105 ± 0.2×105
5 5
liver 0.8×10 28.0×10 7.8×105 ± 0.6×105
The results in Table (2) showed that, the 50%, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebriella ozaenae &
incidences of enteric bacteria isolated from the Providencia rettgeri 40% of each, Citrobacter
examined samples were Proteus vulgaris 50% was diversus & Proteus mirabilis 30% of each,
isolated at highest level from beef burger followed Citrobacter freundii & Enterobacter cloacae 20% of
by Enterobacter aerogenes 40%, Klebriella ozaenae each and Enterobacter agglomerans 10%. from liver
30%, Citrobacter freundii & Proteus mirabilis 20% samples Enterobacter aerogenes was isolated at the
of each and Citrobacter diversus, Enterobacter highest level 70%, followed by Citrobacter freundii,
cloacae, Klebriella pneumonia & Providencia Proteus mirabilis & Providencia rettgeri 50% of
rettgeri 10% of each from beef burger. Moreover, each, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebriella pneumonia
Proteus mirabilis 60%, Klebriella ozaenae 50%, & Proteus vulgaris 40% of each, Serratia
Providencia rettgeri 40%, Citrobacter freundii, liquefaciens 30%, Citrobacter diversus &
Enterobacter aerogenes & Proteus vulgaris 30% of Enterobacter agglomerans 20% of each and
each, Enterobacter cloacae & Klebriella pneumonia Klebriella ozaenae 10%. Such organisms were
20% 0f each and Citrobacter diversus 10% were previously isolated from fast food by [11,21,12]
isolated from kofta samples. Consequently, Proteus who isolated these members of Enterobacteriaceae
vulgaris 70%, was isolated at highest level from from the examined samples of ready-to-eat kofta.
sausage samples followed by Klebriella pneumonia
Table (2) Incidence of Enteric bacteria isolated from the examined samples of ready to eat meat products (n=30)
Beef burger Kofta Sausage Liver
Identified Bacteria
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Citrobacter diversus 1 10 1 10 3 30 2 20
Citrobacter freundii 2 20 3 30 2 20 5 50
Enterobacter aerogenes 4 40 3 30 4 40 7 70
Enterobacter agglomerans - - - - 1 10 2 20
Enterobacter cloacae 1 10 2 20 2 20 4 40
Enterobacter hafniae - - 1 10 - - - -
Klebriella ozaenae 3 30 5 50 4 40 1 10
Klebriella pneumoniae 1 10 2 20 5 50 4 40
Proteus mirabilis 2 20 6 60 3 30 4 50
Proteus vulgaris 5 50 3 30 7 70 3 40
Providencia rettgeri 1 10 4 40 4 40 5 50
Serratia liquefaciens - - - - 1 10 3 30
Data presented in Table (3) showed that, the sausage & liver samples have the same incidence of
mean values of coliform count in the examined occurrence 16.7%, 33.3%, respectively. These
cooked burger, kofta, sausage, liver were 1.6 ×103 ± results came in accordance with those obtained by
0.1×103, 3.0×103 ± 0.2×103, 4.1×103 ± 0.3×103, [4], but higher than [41,34], and lower than
7.0×103 ± 0.5×103 respectively. The current results [47,13,18,27,2]. In general, heat treated foods must
agree with those recorded by [12,1]. However, be free from E. coli [19]. The detection or even low
higher findings were obtained by [17,38]. number of E. coli in foods constitutes a public
Results in Table (4) revealed that the incidences health hazard [23].
of E. coli in beef burger & kofta samples and
Table (3) The results of total Coliform counts (cfu/g) in the examined samples of ready to eat meat products
(n=30)
Products Min. Max. Mean± SEM*
Beef burger 0.7×10 12.0×10 3.6×104 ± 0.2×104
4 4
Table (5) indicated that the mean values of of kofta were nearly similar to those obtained by
Staphylococcal count in the examined cooked [34] 1.13 x103 cfu/g. Meanwhile, they were lower
burger, kofta, sausage, liver were 9.0×102 ± than those obtained by [13] 6.91x103 cfu/g and [48]
0.8×102, 2.3×103 ± 0.2×103, 4.3×103 ± 0.4×103, 5.41×103 cfu/g.
5.9×103 ± 0.4×103 respectively. The current results
Table (5) The results of Staphylococci counts (cfu/g) in the examined samples of ready to eat meat products
(n=30)
Products Min. Max. Mean± SEM*
Kofta 0.3×103 8.0×103 2.3×103 ± 0.2×103
Sausage 0.9×103 9.0×103 4.3×103 ± 0.4×103
3 3
liver 1.0×10 20.0×10 5.9×103 ± 0.4×103
Furthermore, the results obtained in Table (6) The obtained results in Table (7), showed that
revealed that Staph. aureus were isolated from beef the incidences of Staph. Aureus enterotoxins sea,
burger, kofta, sausage and liver sandwiches with an sab, sec and sed in the examined samples were
incidence of 14.3% with a mean value of 4.8×102 ± 33.3%, 16.6%, 16.6%, 8.3%, respectively. The
0.3×102 ,19% with a mean value of 6.4×102 ± current results nearly similar to those recorded by
0.8×102, 28.6% with a mean value of 1.6×103 ± [46,20]. Time and temperature abuse of a food
0.1×103 and 38.1% with a mean value of 2.2×103 ± product contaminated with enterotoxigenic
0.1×103, respectively. Nearly similar results were Staphylococci can result in formation of
recorded by [31,22]. These results were disagreed enterotoxin, which produce foodborne illness. [9].
with those of [28,35,26] who found that all This enterotoxin is heat stable. Even if the food is
examined kofta, sausage samples were free from S. heated before eating, the poison in the food will
aureus. The problem of Staph. aureus as cause illness although the heat has killed the
contaminants in the food supply remains significant bacterial cells [14].
on a global level as it is an important causative Finally, the present study proved that ready to
agent of food poisoning outbreaks worldwide [10]. eat meat products are considered public health
Although food handlers are usually the main source hazard, due to the presence of aerobic bacteria,
of food contamination in food poisoning outbreaks, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, E. coli,
equipment and environmental surfaces can also be Staphylococci, Staph. aureus enterotoxins.
sources of contamination with Staph. aureus [42].
Table (6) Statistical analytical results of Staph. aureus count (cfu/g) in the examined samples of ready to eat
meat products (n=30)
Products +ve Samples Min. Max. Mean± SEM*
N0. %
Beef burger 3 14.3 1.0×102 9.0×102 4.8×102 ± 0.3×102
2 2
Kofta 4 19.0 2.0×10 10.0×10 6.4×102 ± 0.8×102
3 3
Sausage 6 28.6 0.5×10 4.0×10 1.6×103 ± 0.1×103
liver 8 38.1 0.6×103 7.0×103 2.2×103 ± 0.1×103