Structcon Designs PVT LTD.: National Highways Authority of India

STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT LTD.
A-399, DXL House, Near Antony Motors, Mahape, Navi Mumbai - 400710
Owner NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
CONSTRUCTION OF DWARKA EXPRESSWAY BETWEEN DESIGN CH.

Project
KM5+300 TO 9+500 (PACKAGE -2) IN THE STATE OF DELHI.
DETAILED DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM FOR 12M TO 13.35M WIDE RCC

Title VOIDED SLAB SUPERSTRUCTURE FOR 78.007M - 3 SPAN
CONTINUOUS UNIT FROM P460 TO A14 AT MCE4 STRING
Contractor J.KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LTD.
Authority's Engineer STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Proof checking consultants Tandon Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Date Rev. Description Note No.

REVISED AS PER PROOF CONSULTANT'S
19-Apr-22 P1 COMMENTS RECEIVED VIDE LETTER NO. SC-960-S-B3-DN-5202A
EB-351-DWEXP-PKG02-PCRS-0342-R0

26-Apr-22 P2 COMMENTS RECEIVED VIDE LETTER NO. SC-960-S-B3-DN-5202A

17-May-22 P2 COMMENTS RECEIVED VIDE LETTER NO. SC-960-S-B3-DN-5202A
ISSUED FOR AUTHORITY'S ENGINEER
APPROVAL AFTER CLOSURE OF TCPL'S
23-Jun-22 R0 COMMENTS RECIEVED VIDE LETTER NO.
SC-960-S-B3-DN-5202A
EB-351-DWEXP-PKG02-PCRS-0342- R3-Closed
Date Prepared Reviewed Approved
Name Name Name Sign
21-Mar-22
SMB AAY ASK
Stamp:
Pages: 88 Approved:
This note is the property of STRUCTCON DESIGNS Pvt. Ltd. it should not be copied or
reproduced without their written permisssion.
Date Rev. Description
21-Mar-22 P0 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL
REVISED AS PER PROOF CONSULTANT'S COMMENTS

19-Apr-22 P1 RECEIVED VIDE LETTER NO. EB-351-DWEXP-PKG02-PCRS-0342-
R0
26-Apr-22 P2 RECEIVED VIDE LETTER NO. EB-351-DWEXP-PKG02-PCRS-0342-
R1
17-May-22 P3 RECEIVED VIDE LETTER NO. EB-351-DWEXP-PKG02-PCRS-0342-
R2
ISSUED FOR AUTHORITY'S ENGINEER APPROVAL AFTER
23-Jun-22 R0 CLOSURE OF TCPL'S COMMENTS RECIEVED VIDE LETTER NO.
EB-351-DWEXP-PKG02-PCRS-0342- R3-Closed
DETAILED DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM FOR 12M TO 13.35M WIDE SC-960-S-B3-DN-5202A
RCC VOIDED SLAB SUPERSTRUCTURE FOR 78.007M - 3 SPAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SEC. PAGE
TITLE
NO. NO.
1.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM AT EXPANSION JOINT LOCATION 4
2.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM AT P461 31
3.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM AT P462 56
4.0 DESIGN OF PROJECTION BELOW DIAPHRAGM 78
5.0 STABILITY CHECK FOR VOIDED SLAB SUPERSTRUCTURE 81
STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD.

1.0 SUMMARY OF FORCES FOR DESIGN OF END DIAPHRAGM AT P458
Voided slab diaphragm design is presented at pier locations P460 as indicated in elevation below.
1.1 LOADS
a) Service Condition:- Loads considered in this condition are Dead Loads, Super Imposed Loads Various possible
position & combinations of Live Load (or SV Load at appropriate position).
b) Jacking Up Condition:- Loads considered in this condition are Dead Loads of superstructure and
Super Imposed Dead Loads. The superstructure is supported on jacks.
c) Construction Stage:- Loads considered in this condition are self weight of superstructure and load from
middle support. The superstructure is considered to be supported on temporary supports at bearing locations.
The Diaphragm has been designed by following methodologies.

a) Deep Beam Method as given in IS 456:2000
b) Strut & Tie Method
The diaphragm is designed by all the above methodologies and critical requirements of reinforcement are
provided during detailing.
Deep Beam Method as per IS 456:2000

This method is mainly used for calculating tensile reinforcement and its distribution across the depth of
diaphragm
Strut & Tie Method

The Strut & Tie method is used for calculating the Tie Reinforcment at top and the Stresses in the Strut.
The Stresses are calculated at the most critical point for possible Load Combination and the Bearing Stresses
are checked as per IRC 112 - Equation : -16.13
1.2 DESIGN DATA
Single Span length (P460 to P461)= 27.04 m (Box C/C of pier)

Single Span length (P461 to P462)= 25.922 m (Box C/C of pier)
Single Span length (P462 to A14)= 25.045 m (Box C/C of pier)
Single Span length (bearing to bearing) (P460 to P461) 26.04 m (C/C of bearing)
Single Span length (bearing to bearing) (P461 to P462) 25.922 m (C/C of bearing)
Single Span length (bearing to bearing) (P462 to A14) 24.045 m (C/C of bearing)
Depth of girder= 1.7 m
Width of girder= 13.35 m
Bearing C/C in transverse direction= 5 m
Jack C/C in transverse direction= 3.3 m
Radius of curvature at Reference of box girder,R= 65.62 m 60.025 m
Design Speed of vehicle, V= 65 kmph
Design Speed of vehicle for SV, V= 5 kmph
Height of C.G. of vehicle above road = 1.2 m
Height of crash barrier= 1.2 m
Impact factor for Class A vehicle= 1.150 (Conservatively taken for smallest span)
Impact factor for Class 70R (W) vehicle= 1.150
Wearing Coat Thickness 0.05 m
Density of concrete = 25 kN/m3
Density of wearing coat= 22 kN/m3
2/3 eccentricity due to curvature 0.858 m 2/3 x (R x (1-Cos(L/(2R) x 180/π))
Max Height of bearing and Pedestal 0.5 m
Pedestal Size 1.2 x 1.2 m
Grade of Concrete of Superstructure M50
Grade of Concrete for Pedestal M50
Grade of Reinforcement Fe 500
Page 4
VARIES FROM 12000 TO 13350
Fig 13. Cross Section of End Diaphragm
1.3 SUMMARY OF FORCES
1.3.1 FORCES AT P460

The following reactions are extracted from MIDAS model "P460-A14-SS - DIAPHRAGM".
Values of Shear force and Torsional moment mentioned in table below are obtained from calculating the Support Reaction at
support node 2 and node 9.
Centrifugal Force = 0.50698
Sr. No. Load Case R9 R2 Fz Mx Load case in MIDAS

kN kN kN kNm
1 Self Weight 1369 2311 3680 2356
2 SIDL (CB) 93 140 233 118
3 SSIDL (WC) 70 105 175 89
4 3-CLASS A -456 1189 733 4113 MVmax3A-Fz2

5 1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R -546 1305 759 4629 MVmax1-A+1-70R-Fz2
6 1-CLASS70R -363 730 366 2732 MVmax1-70R-Fz2
7 2-CLASS A -524 1632 1108 5390 MVmax2-A-Fz2
8 1-CLASS 70R+1-CLASS A -382 1489 1107 4676 MVmax1-70R+1-A-Fz2
9 SV 1031 489.3 1520 1354 SV(all)
Impact factor- IRC 6 : 2017- Clause 208

1) Class A = 1.15
2) Class 70R (Wheeled) = 1.15
Congestion factor = 1.15 IRC 6 : 2017- Clause 204.4
Page 5
Reaction Calculation due to Live Load (including Impact Factor)

kN kN kN kNm
1 3-CLASS A x I.F. -482 1326 844 4518 MVmax3A-Fz24
2 1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R x I.F. -537 1813 1276 5876 MVmax1-A+1-70R-Fz24
3 1-CLASS70R x I.F. -583 1457 874 5101 MVmax1-70R-Fz24
4 2-CLASS A x I.F. -396 818 422 3036 MVmax2-A-Fz24
5 1-CLASS 70R+1-CLASS A x I.F. 34 222 257 469 MVmax1-70R+1-A-Fz24
Reaction Calculation due to Live Load (including Impact Factor and Congestion Factor)
Sr. No. Load Case Fz Mx Load case in MIDAS
kN kNm
1 3-CLASS A x I.F. x C.F. 970 0 MVmax3A-Fz24
2 1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R x I.F. x C.F. 1004 0 MVmax1-A+1-70R-Fz24
3 1-CLASS70R x I.F. x C.F. 484 0 MVmax1-70R-Fz24
4 2-CLASS A x I.F. x C.F. 1466 0 MVmax2-A-Fz24
5 1-CLASS 70R+1-CLASS A x I.F. x C.F. 1464 0 MVmax1-70R+1-A-Fz24
1.3.2 WIND LOAD
A) With Live Load-
Superstructure :
Basic wind speed For Live Load 36m/s Vb 36 m/s
Ht of structure above GL/bed/water level for Wind H 13.00 m
According to Table 05,IRC:06-2014 (Wind with Obstruction)
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
H (m) Vz (m/s) Pz( N/m2)
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 36 m/s
For Live Load
36m/s 20.596 254.678
For Pz Calculation Refer Cl.209.2,Note 04,IRC:06-2014

Lift coefficient CL 0.75
Gust Factor G 2
Wind Load Vertical at 36m/s

Force
2
Design Vertical Wind Pressure 0.382 kN/m
Upward force 13.35 x 0.3820
UDL of all Beams = 5.10 kN/m (Applied as UDL in Midas)
Page 6
Wind Load Transverse at 36m/s-

Lateral Wind CD 1.308 for b/d 5.8432
Exposed Elevational Area Span 1 78.007 m
Depth 4.7 m Girder + height of vehicle 1.7 + 3
Area 366.6 m2
Hence wind load on superstructure 244 kN
Lever Arm Break Up
Height
of mid
crash Thickness
Slab Wearing vehicle height
barrier of
depth Coart above of
ht Downstand
crash bearing
barrier
1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1
Lever Arm cg of wind load = 2.625 m

Break Up Calculation 0.1 + 0.15 + (1.7+0.05+1.2+1.8)/2
Wind Load Application in MIDAS-

This wind Load has been applied on Superstructure in Midas as UDL in = 3.13 kN/m
Local y as (Transverse Wind on Superstructure + wind on Live Load)/Span
This wind load acts on a point 0.65 m above the Box Girder = 0.65 m = (4.7)/2-1.7
B) Without Live Load-
Superstructure :
Basic wind speed Vb 47 m/s
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 47 m/s
For Live Load
47m/s 26.890 434.092

Gust Factor G 2

Force
2
Page 7

Area 366.6 m2
Lever Arm Break Up
Height
of
crash mid
Slab Wearing Thickness of vehicle
barrier height of
depth Coart Downstand above
ht bearing
crash
barrier
1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1


This wind load acts on a point 0.65 m above the Box Girder = 0.65 = (4.7)/2-1.7
Reaction due to Wind Loads-

kN kN kN kNm
1 Wind Load- Vertical (With Live Load) 23 35 58 29 WIND VERTICAL-with LL
2 Wind Load- Transverse (With Live Load) -25 24 -1 122 WIND TRANSVERSE-with LL
3 Wind Load- Vertical (Without Live Load) 39 59 99 50 WIND VERTICAL-without LL

4 Wind Load- Transverse (Without Live Load) -42 41 -1 208 WIND TRANSVERSE-without LL
1.3.3 SEISMIC LOAD
Horizontal Seismic Loads-

Zone Factor= Z = 0.24
Importance Factor= I = 1.2
Response reduction Factor = R = 1 (For superstructure)
Sa/g= 2.500 (Value taken from substructure design of A14)
Seismic Coefficient for horizontal motions=
Ah = 0.360
Vertical Seismic Loads-

Vertical Seismic
Response reduction Factor = R = 1
Sa/g= 2.5
Seismic Coefficient for vertical motions=

Av = 0.24
Page 8
Transverse Seismic Force

Reaction
Vertical Lever Arm
Loads (From V X Ah
about top of bearing
Midas)
kN kN m
Dead Load 22858 8229 1.243
SIDL - CB 1599 576 2.550
SIDL - WC 1204 434 1.975
Live Load (Max) 660 238 3.200
The Transverse Seismic Force is Applied as UDL in MIDAS File as Follows
(V X Ah )/ Vertical Lever Arm Moment about top

Loads
Span from Top of Box of Slab
kN m kN.m
Dead Load 105 -0.707 -74.60
SIDL - CB 7 0.600 4.43
SIDL - WC 6 0.025 0.14
Live Load 3 1.250 3.81
Sum 121 kN/m Sum -66.23 kN.m/m
Transverse
Seismic Force = 121 kN/m (Applied in Midas as UDL LY(Local)
with Live Load @ -0.55 m below top of girder
Vertical Upward Seismic Loads-
Loads Reaction V X Av
kN kN
Dead Load 22858 5486
SIDL - CB 1599 384 UDL applied = 83.1 kN/m
SIDL - WC 1204 289
Live Load 660 158
Horizontal Seismic Loads (Longitudinal)-

Sa/g= 1.580 (Value taken from substructure design of P461)
Ah = 0.2275
Page 9
Longitudinal Seismic Force

Loads Reaction V X Ah
kN kN
SIDL - CB 1599 364
SIDL - WC 1204 274
The Longitudinal Seismic Force is Applied as UDL in MIDAS File as Follows
Loads (V X Ah )/ C.G. from Top of Slab Moment about top

kN m kN.m
Dead Load 66.67 -0.707 -47.15
SIDL - CB 4.66 0.600 2.80
SIDL - WC 3.51 0.025 0.09

Longitudinal
Seismic Force = 75 kN/m (Applied in Midas as UDL LX(Local)
with Live Load @ -0.59 m below top of voided slab
Reaction due to Seismic Loads-
Sr. Load Case R9 R2 Fz Mx Load case in MIDAS

No. kN kN kN kNm
1 Vertical Seismic Load 339 591 930 630 EQv
2 Transverse Seismic Load -547 526 -20 2682 EQT
3 Londitudinal Seismic Load -75 -115 -190 101 EQL
1.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS
1.4.1 ULS Load Combinations during Service Condition
LC1 1.35 (SW) + 1.35 (CB) + 1.75 (WC) +1.5 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F x C.F)
LC2 1.35 (SW) + 1.35 (CB) + 1.75 (WC) +1.15 (Special Vehicle)
LC3 1.35 (SW) + 1.35 (CB) + 1.75 (WC) +1.5 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F) + 0.9 (Vertical WL with LL + Transverse with LL)
LC4 1.35 (SW) + 1.35 (CB) + 1.75 (WC) +1.5 (3 -Class A x I.F) + 0.9 (Vertical WL with LL + Transverse WL with LL)
LC5 1.35 SW + 1.35 CB + 1.75 WC + 0.2 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F ) + 1.5 Eqv + 0.45 EqT + 0.45 EqL
LC6 1.35 SW + 1.35 CB + 1.75 WC + 0.2 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F ) - 1.5 Eqv + 0.45 EqT + 0.45 EqL
LC8 1.35 SW + 1.35 CB + 1.75 WC + 0.2 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F )- 0.45 Eqv + 1.5 EqT + 0.45 EqL
1.4.2 ULS Load Combinations during Bearing Replacement Condition
LC101 1.35 SW + 1.35 CB + 1.75 WC Spacing of supports is 3.30 m
1.4.3 SLS Rare Load Combinations during Service Condition
SLS-R 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC) +1.0 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F) + 0.6 (Vertical WL with LL + Transverse WL with LL)
1.4.4 SLS Quasi Permanent Load Combinations during Service Condition

SLS-Q 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC) \
Page 10
2 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM P460

C/L of Bearing C/L of Bearing
250
535
6400
1175 1500
800
5000
2.1 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM BASED ON DEEP BEAM THEORY AS PER IS 456:2000
Fig 14. Loading Diagram for Self Weight of Diaphragm
Page 11
2.1.1 SELF WEIGHT & SIDL CALCULATION
i) Dead load of Diaphragm

a) thickness depth density
= 1.5 x 1.7 x 25
= 63.75 kN/m UDL
b) thickness depth density

= 1.5 x 0.535 x 25
= 20.06 kN/m UDL
ii) Dead load of Deck Slab

a) 1.5 x 0.25 x 25
= 9.375 kN/m UDL
iii) SIDL-CB
= 10.25 x 1.5
= 15.38 KN
Fig 15. Loading Diagram SIDL-CB
iv) SSIDL-WC
= 1.25 x 1.5
= 1.875 kN/m
Fig 16. Loading Diagram SIDL-WC
Page 12
2.1.2 LIVE LOAD CALCULATION

These will be calculated for various cases using the concept of effective width.
Loads will be placed to maximise a particular moment and for this effective widths will be calculated and loads
converted to load per metre width
Calculations for the effective width of slab
bef = Effective width of slab on which load acts

bef = α.a(1 - a / lo ) + b1
α = 2.6 Constant for continous slab for continous slab of b/l0 = 5.6
b1 = Breadth of concentration area of the load
a = Distance of c.g. of concentrated load from nearer support
b = Total Width Of Slab = 28 m
lo = effective span = 5.00 m
c = deck thickness = 0.25 m
Along traffic
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 0.25 = 0.36 m For Class A (Table 2 IRC 6)
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 0.23 = 0.34 m For Class 70R(W)
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 4.57 = 4.68 m For Class 70R(T)
Loaded length Perpendicular to Traffic

Class A = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.5
= 1.108 m
Class 70 RW = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.86
= 1.468 m
Class 70 RT = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.84
= 1.448 m
Clearance
Class A = 150 + 250
= 400 mm
Class 70 R(T) = 1200 + 430

= 1630 mm
Class 70 R(W) = 1200 + 420

= 1620 mm
Impact Factors
Reinforced concrete bridges IRC 6 cl 208.2 and 208.3
I.F = 4.5
6 + L
Class A Cantilever = 0.56
Class A beam = 0.41 Span C/C = 5.000 m
Class70 R(W) Cantilever = 0.25

beam = 0.25
Class70 R(T) Cantilever = 0.25

beam = 0.25
Page 13
Axle Load of one wheel

Class A
Axle Load of one wheel = 11.4 x 10 = 57 kN
2
Class70 R(W)
Axle Load of one wheel = 20 x 10 = 100 kN
2
Class70 R(T)
2
Vehicle Positions & Effective width calculations
2 Class A placed close to left crash barrier - For max cantilever BM
A) First wheel
bef1 = 1.2 x 1.78 + 0.36 W1 = 57 x 1.56
(Along traffic Direction) 1.84
= 2.5 m > 1.20
= 1.84 m For 1m wide = 48.3 kN/m
For 1.5 m wide Diaphragm = 72.4 kN/m
B) Second wheel
bef2 = 2.6 x 0.03 x ( 1 - 0.025 ) + 0.36 W2 = 57 x 1.41
(Along traffic Direction) 5.00 0.42
= 0.4 m < 1.20
= 0.42 m For 1m wide = 80 kN/m
C) Third wheel
bef3 = 2.6 x 1.73 x ( 1 - 1.73 ) + 0.36 W3 = 57 x 1.41
= 3.3 m > 1.20
D) Fourth wheel
bef4 = 2.6 x 3.53 x ( 1 - 3.53 ) + 0.36 W4 = 57 x 1.41
= 3.1 m > 1.20
Fig 17. Loading Diagram for Live lod Distribution (For design on Cantiliever)
Page 14
2.1.3 SUPERSTRUCTURE LIVE LOADS ON DIAPHRAGM
VED- VED- VED- VED-

OUTER- INNER- VED- INNER- OUTER-
LEFT LEFT CENTER RIGHT RIGHT
2300 2300
Load Cases and Corresponding Shear Force and Torsion at the Junction of Diaphragm
Loading Table
VED- VED- VED- VED-
Sr Shear VED-
Load Case Element Torsion OUTER- INNER- INNER- OUTER-
no Force CENTRE
LEFT LEFT RIGHT RIGHT
& Node Fz Mx
kN kN.m kN kN kN kN kN
1 Self Weight R[2]+R[9] 3680 2356 1052 722 722 722 462
2 SIDL -CB (Crash Parapet) R[2]+R[9] 233 118 63 46 46 46 33
3 SSIDL - WC (wearing Coat) R[2]+R[9] 175 89 47 34 34 34 25
4 WIND VERTICAL-without LL R[2]+R[9] 99 50 27 19 19 19 14
5 WIND TRANSVERSE-without LL R[2]+R[9] -1 208 26 0 0 0 -26
6 WIND VERTICAL-with LL R[2]+R[9] 58 29 16 11 11 11 8
7 WIND TRANSVERSE-with LL R[2]+R[9] -1 122 15 0 0 0 -15
8 Vertical Seismic Load EqV R[2]+R[9] 930 630 270 182 182 182 112
9 Transverse Seismic Load EqT R[2]+R[9] -20 2682 331 -4 -4 -4 -339
10 Londitudinal Seismic Load R[2]+R[9] -190 101 -26 -37 -37 -37 -52
Live Load Cases

11 3-CLASS A x I.F. R[2]+R[9] 844 4518 738 166 166 166 -391
12 1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R x I.F. R[2]+R[9] 1276 5876 997 250 250 250 -472
13 1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R x I.F. x C.F. R[2]+R[9] 1004 0 207 197 197 197 207
14 Special vehicle R[2]+R[9] 1520 1354 482 298 298 298 143
Page 15
Analysis Results (Shear Force) ( Refer the Attached STAAD FILE)

1 2 3 4 5
Fig 18.Locations at which results are extracted
( Refer the
FED 3 FED 4 FED FED 4 FED 3 FED 2 FED 1
Analysis Results (Shear Force) Attached FED 1 Left FED 2 Left
Left Left Middle 5 Right Right Right Right
STAAD FILE)
kN kN kN kN kN kN kN kN kN
Depth at the Section in metre 0.250 0.535 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 0.535 0.250
Node 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LC1 -38 -1971 -2019 2575 0 2049 1144 1096 38
LC2 -38 -2215 -2263 2762 0 2003 998 950 38
LC3 -38 -3184 -3232 3380 0 1512 119 71 38
LC4 -149 -2907 -3136 3291 0 1388 241 192 38
LC5 -38 -2402 -2450 2841 0 1810 731 683 38
LC6 -38 -1592 -1640 1880 0 1133 395 347 38
LC7 -38 -2466 -2515 2710 0 1355 257 209 38
LC8 -38 -2223 -2272 2421 0 1152 157 108 38
LC9 -38 -2091 -2140 2455 0 1506 559 511 38
LC10 -38 -1848 -1897 2166 0 1303 458 410 38
M
M2 M3 M4 M4 M3 M2 M1
Analysis Results (Bending Moment) M 1 Left Middl
Left Left Left Right Right Right Right
e5
( Refer the Attached STAAD FILE) kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m
Node 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LC1 29 109 1702 3138 -652 1824 1002 109 29
LC2 29 109 1897 3503 -676 1605 885 109 29
LC3 29 109 2672 4957 -695 287 182 109 29
LC4 59 307 2788 5005 -416 469 279 109 29
LC5 29 109 2047 3784 -657 1205 671 109 29
LC6 29 109 1399 2569 -397 701 403 109 29
LC7 29 109 2098 3880 -564 495 293 109 29
LC8 29 109 1904 3516 -486 344 212 109 29
LC9 29 109 1798 3318 -548 947 534 109 29
LC10 29 109 1604 2954 -470 796 453 109 29
2.1.4 DESIGN OF DEEP BEAM DURING SERVICE CONDITION

2.1.4.1 Horizontal Reinforcement (Main Steel)
D = 1.95 m
Span to Depth = 5.00 / 1.95 l = 5 m
= 2.56 NOT to be designed as a Deep beam b = 1.5 m
Page 16
Design as a flexure beam-
Maximum Bending moment M ED = 5005 kNm

Overall depth of beam h = 1700 mm
Clear cover C = 45 mm
Diameter of longitudinal rebar φ = 32 mm
Diameter of transverse rebar = 32 mm
Effective depth of section d = (h-C-φ/2) = 1595 mm
Width of the section bw = 1500 mm
2
For M50 concrete fck = 50 N/mm
fcd = 22.3 N/mm2
Depth of neutral axis X =
𝑑/2𝛽2 −[√((𝑑/2𝛽2)2−(𝑀𝐸𝐷/𝛽1𝛽2𝑏𝑤𝑓𝑐𝑑) )] X = 119.4 mm
….Refer section 8 of IRC-SP-105-2015
Check for neutral axis -
Xlim = (εcu*d) / (εcu + εyd )
Xlim = 983.89 Hence Ok >X
Lever arm z = (d-0.416x)
= 1545 mm
Area of steel required Ast=M ED /(0.87*fyk*z) = 7446 mm2
No. of bars of 32 mm φ reqd. = 9
No of bars provided in 1st layer =
Provided 32 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c + 10
reinforce 32 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c +
ment 0 mm bar @ 0 mm c/c + 0
Ast provided = 8042 mm2
Provided reinforcement is adequate
Minimum reinforcement as per Clause 16.5.1 of IRC 112-2011

Maximum of :
i] 0.0013 bt X d,
ii] 0.26 X fctm X bt X d / fyk
Astmin = 4354 mm2 < 8042 mm2
Hence Ok
2.1.4.2 Top Reinforcement Over Cantilever
Mu = 307 kN.m
2
Astreq = 1620.81 mm
Astprovided = 32 Y 4 Nos
2
= 3217 mm
Page 17
2.1.5 DESIGN OF DEEP BEAM DURING BEARING REPLACEMENT CONDITION
Analysis Results
FED
Sr
Load Case (Shear Force) FED 1 FED 2 FED 3 FED 4 Middl FED 4 FED 3 FED 2 FED 1
no
Left Left Left Left e5 Right Right Right Right
kN.m kN kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN kN.m
1) Bearing Replacement Condition -37.882 -1661 -1709 2131.3 0 896.11 833.33 785 37.882
M
Sr
Load Case (Bending Moment) M2 M3 M4 Middl M4 M3 M2 M1
no
M 1 Left Left Left Left e5 Right Right Right Right
kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m
1) Bearing Replacement Condition 28.707 109 1454 2671.9 -512.4 1358.7 753.35 109 28.707
2.1.5.1 Reinforcement Calculations
Horizontal Reinforcement (Main Steel)

D = 1.95
Span to Depth = 3.30 / 1.95 l = 3.3
= 1.69 Design as a Deep beam b = 1.5
As per IS 456 , cl. 29.2
z = 0.2 ( l+ 1.5 D) when 1 < l/D < 2
Case 1 for negative r/f zone
z = 1.245 m tension steel 2941 mm2
60 % 0.2D
a) Top Reinforcement Over Support 390 mm
0.3D
Ast = Mu tension steel 1992 mm2
0.87 fy Z 1950 mm 40 % 1170 mm
= 2671908000 0.3D
541575
0.2D
= 4934 mm2 390 mm
1.5 mm
Fig 19. Reinforcement Distribution For Deep
Beam (During Jacking Condition)
This reinforcement should be provided in 0.8 times the depth of beam

2
i) Top Reinforcement = 2941 mm 32 # 4 nos of bars
ii) Remaininng Side Horizontal Reinforcement
2
= 1992 mm 20 # 6 total nos of bars on both faces
Hence provide 20 φ @ 368.966 mm c/c on each face
b) Side Face Reinforcement
2
Surface Reinforcement 500 mm /m
Page 18
c) Vertical Reinforcement (Stirrups)
i) Vertical Stirrups required based on IRC 112 clause 16.7.1. (4)
2
Vertical Reinforcement = 0.5 x FED/fyd. mm
Area of vertical reinforcement 3885 near support at node 5
2
The Reinforcement shall be distributed upto mm /mm
Asv = 1.306
Hence provide 6 Legged 10 φ @ 360.86 mm c/c along the Span
ii) Shear Reinforcement required at location 4 as per IRC 112 Clause 10.3.2
(This reinforcement shall be extended between bearing supports.)
Depth Available 1.700 m
VEd = 3232 kN at distance approximately equal to effective depth 'd' support at node 4
K = 1 + 200 ≤ 2 where d is depth

d
bw = minimum breadth of the section over the depth
K = 1 + 200 ≤ 2 where d is depth in mm

d
= 1.35 b = 1500 mm
d = 1595 mm
ρ1 = Asw ≤ 0.02
b.d
= 2941
1500 x 1595
= 0.0012 ≤ 0.02
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement VRd.c is given by:
νmin = [ 0.12 K (80ρ1.fck)0.33 ] As per IRC 112-2011 Cl 10.3.2
= [ 0.12 x 1.35 ( 80 x 0.0012 x 50 )^0.33 ]
= 0.275
νmin = 0.031.K3/2fck1/2
= 0.031 x 1.35 ^3/2 x 50 ^1/2
= 0.345
VRd.c = [ νmin ] x bw.d

= 0.345 x 1500 x 1595
= 826 KN < 3232 KN Design for Shear
Page 19
Calculation of Shear Reinforcement

Design Shear
VNS = 3232 kN
vNS = VNS As per IRC 112-2011 Cl 10.3.3.1
bw x z
= 3232 x 1000
1500 x 1436
= 1.501
θ = 0.5 sin-1 vNS

0.134 fck [ 1 - fck / 310
θ = 0.5 sin-1 0.2671
θ = 7.65 < 21.8 take Cot θ as 2.5
Dia of Bar 10 mm No of Legs = 6

VRd.s = A sw z fywd cot θ As per IRC 112-2011 Cl 10.3.3.2
s
A sw = 3.14 x 10 x 10 x 6
4
= 471.24 mm2
s = 471.24 x 1435.5 x 435 x 2.5
3232.23 x 1000
= 228 mm
Minimum percentage of shear reinforcement

pmin = 0.072 x sqrt(fck)
fyk
= 0.072 x 7.07107
500
pmin = 0.00102
Minimum Area of shear reinforcement assume
requiredspacing = 1000 mm
Asw = pmin
bt x s
Asw = 0.00102 x 1500 x 1000
= 1527.4 mm²
Check for maximum shear force which can be sustained by the member
VRd max = αcw bw z ν1 fcd

(cot θ + tan θ)
αcw = 1
z = 0.9d = 1435.5 mm
ν1 = 0.6 x [1-fck /310] = 0.60
fcd = 22.3
VRd max = 5770.7 kN > VNS Hence OK
Provide 10 mm dia 6 legged stirrups @ 200 mm c/c spacing

SAFE
Page 20
2.2 DESIGN AS A STRUT AND TIE
2.2.1 STRUT AND TIE MODEL OF END DIAPHRAGM
2300 2300
Fig 20 . During Service Condition
2300 2300
Fig 21 . During Bearing Replacement Case
Model Showing Strut Lines Joining Point of Load Application to Jack Supports and Bearing Supports.
2.2.2 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM DURING SERVICE CONDITION

VED- VED-
VED- VED-
OUTER- VED- OUTER-
INNER- INNER-
LEFT CENTER RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT
2300 2300
Fig 22. Strut & Tie Schematic Model During Service Condition
Page 21
2.2.2.1 Load Cases and Corresponding Shear Force and Torsion at the Junction of Diaphragm
VED- VED- VED- VED-

Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[2]+R[9] 3680 2356 1052 722 722 722 462
7 WIND TRANSVERSE-with LL R[2]+R[9] -1 122 15 0 0 0 -15
8 Vertical Seismic Load EqV R[2]+R[9] 930 630 270 182 182 182 112
10 Londitudinal Seismic Load R[2]+R[9] -190 101 -26 -37 -37 -37 -52
Live Load Cases

10 3-Class A x 1.F. R[2]+R[9] 844 4518 738 166 166 166 -391
11 1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F R[2]+R[9] 1276 5876 997 250 250 250 -472
12 1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F x C.F R[2]+R[9] 1004 0 207 197 197 197 207
2.2.2.2 Load Combinations

ULS Load Combination
SLS Rare)
SLS-R 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC) +1.0 (1 -Class A + 1 Class 70R x I.F) + 0.6 (Vertical WL with LL + Transverse with LL)
SLS Quasi)
SLS-Q 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC)
Page 22
FT1 FT2
FC1
FC2
RA FC3 RB
T= Tension (-)
C= Compression (+)
Fig 23. Typical Strut & Tie STAAD output axial force diagram (For LC1)
ULS Load Combiation

Sr No. FT1 FT2 FC1 FC2 FC3 RA RB
kN kN kN kN kN kN kN
Node 15 Node 16
Beam
16 32 20 29 23
No.
LC1 -1825 -1418 2633 2641 286 4248 2848
LC2 -2059 -1626 2971 2852 414 4680 2655
LC3 -2991 -2477 4316 3547 1018 6267 1286
LC4 -2618 -2157 3777 3162 851 5536 1371
LC5 -2240 -1799 3231 2941 562 4946 2195
LC6 -1461 -1185 2107 1861 407 3175 1182
LC7 -2301 -1893 3320 2793 738 4879 1267
LC8 -2068 -1709 2983 2469 691 4347 963
LC9 -1941 -1567 2800 2507 517 4249 1720
LC10 -1707 -1383 2463 2183 470 3718 1416
SLS Rare & Quasi case

SLS-R -2103 -1737 3034 2517 699 4427 1005

SLS-Q -1126 -885 1625 1581 211 2579 1544
Page 23
2.2.2.3 Stress Check and Reinforcement Calculation
Limiting Compressive Stress in Strut Fig 6.5 - IRC 112
fcd = 0.67/1.5 x fck fctm = 3.52 N/mm2

= 22.33 N/mm2
a) Calculating Maximum Concrete stress in Strut
2
Maximum Stress= 4316 x 1000 = 4.43 N/mm2 < 22.33 N/mm
650 x 1500 Hence Safe
b) Design of Reinforcement in the Upper tie for ULS Case & SLS Rare care
For ULS Case Ast = FT / (0.87 x fyk) = 6876.4 mm2
For SLS Rare Case Ast = FT / (0.6 x fyk) = 7009.6 mm2
c) Design of Tensile Stress in Concrete Tie member in Quasi permanent load Case
For SLS Quasi σTensile = 1126 x 1000 = 1.16 N/mm2 < 3.515 N/mm2
650 x 1500 Hence Uncracked
Page 24
2.2.3 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM DURING BEARING REPLACEMENT CONDITION
VED- VED- VED- VED-

OUTER- VED- INNER-
INNER- OUTER-
LEFT CENTER RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT
2300 2300
Fig 24 . Strut & Tie Schematic Model During Jacking Condition
VED- VED- VED- VED-

Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[2]+R[9] 3680 2356 1052 722 722 722 462
FT1
FT2
FC1
FC2
T= Tension (-) FC3 RB
C= Compression (+) RA

LC101 -1526 -1199.2 2202.3 2143 286.219 3495 2094

fcd = 0.67/1.5 x fck
= 22.33 N/mm2
a) Calculating Maximum Concrte stress in Outer Strut

Maximum Stress= 2202 x 1000 = 2.25878 N/mm2 < 22.33 N/mm2
650 x 1500 Hence OK
b) Design of Reinforcement in the Upper tie
Ast = FT / (0.87 x fyk) = 3509.06 mm2
Page 25
2.2.3.3 Check for concentrated force above bearing
The Concrete Capacity FRdu is equal to as follows
Acl = 1065 x 1065 = 1134225 mm2

2
Aco = 700 x 700 = 490000 mm
fcd = 22.33 N/mm2
FRdu = 16650 kN > 6267 kN
Hence OK
2.2.3.4 Check against edge sliding IRC 112 16.11.2 & Eu 1992-2.2004 Eurocode 2 J.104
As per cl : 16.1.2 (3), in order to avoid edge sliding, uniformly distributed reinforcement
parallel to the loaded face should be provided to the point at which local compressive stresses
are dispersed.
Reinforcement Ar = F/(2 x fyd).
F 6267 kN
2
Ar = 7203.06 mm over a height of 1500mm
Ast provided = 20 Y 15 Nos 2 Legs

2
= 9425 mm
Page 26
2.2.3.5 Seismic Tie Back Reinforcement

Seismic Tie Back Reinforcement for Transverse Seismic
Total maximum unfactored transverse Seismic Force for one span 1642 kN [99 x [19.756/2+28.062/2]]
Transverse Seismic Force on a Single Bearing Location FT = 1.5 x 1642 kN = 2463 kN
Hence Tie Back Reinforcement to be provided at bottom location above bearing.
A Tie Back = FT /(0.87 x 500)

= 5323.3 mm2
Provide 32 mm dia 13 x 1 no
25 mm dia 0 x 1 no
Ast provided= 10455 mm2 HENCE OK
Seismic Tie Back Reinforcement for Longitudinal Seismic
Total unfactored Longitudinal Seismic Force 5838 kN

Force to be tied back 25% of Longitudinal Seismic Force on one bearing = 1460 kN
Longitudinal Seismic Force on a Single Bearing Location FT = 1.5 x 1460 kN = 2189 kN
A Tie Back = FT /(0.87 x 500)

= 4731.1 mm2
Provide 25 mm dia 25 (Refer Doc SC-960-S-B3-DN-5202)
20 mm dia 24
Ast provided= 19812 mm2
Page 27
2.3 SUMMARY OF REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED
Note:- The Distribution of Horizontal and vertical Steel has been carried out as per IRC 112 - 2011 , along with that Reference from ASSHTO
LRFD for Strut and Tie design has also been taken into account as below.
2.3.1 HORIZONTAL LINKS
The effective concrete area Ac = b 1500 mm thickness of diaphragm

D 1700 mm
Note:- Horizontal Reinforcement calculated from different Cases are provided below
Horizontal Reinforcement which will govern the design criteria will be provided
i) Horizontal Reinforcement Calculated as per Deep Beam Theory

Area of Horizontal Reinforcement in the tie Region (IRC 112 cl 16.7.1 )
= 0.25 x Vertical Main Reinforcement (Stirrups)
2
Ah = 0.25 x 3885 = 971 mm
ii) Horizontal Reinforcement Calculated as per Deep Beam Theory

Area of Horizontal Reinforcement ( From Deep Beam Theory)
2
Ah = 1992 mm
Hence Reinforcement provided is
Diameter of bar = 20 mm
no of legs provided in each stirrup = 2
Height over which Reinforcement is required = 1.56 m
No of Stirrups = 12.0 nos
Spacing of Stirrups Sh = 130
2
Ah = 7539.82 mm
As per AASHTO -LRFD cl (5.6.3.6-1) = Ah > 0.003
(Crack Contorl) b x Sh
Hence Ah = 0.0032 > 0.003

b x Sh Hence OK
Page 28
2.3.2 VERTICAL LINKS
Note:- Vertical Reinforcement calculated from different cases are provided below.
Vertical Reinforcement which shall govern the design criteria will be provided
i) Vertical Reinforcement Calculated as per Strut & Tie Theory

Area of Vertical Reinforcement = 0.5 x Main Reinforcement
2
in the tie Region Av = 3505 mm spanning over c/c distance
ii) Vertical Reinforcement Calculated as per Deep Beam Theory

Area of main Reinforcement due to Shear Calculated from Deep beam
Av = 6 Legged 10 φ @ 360.86 mm c/c

Length over which Reinforcement is required = 2.975
from centre towards cantilever
No of Stirrups = 15 nos.
Spacing of Stirrups Sv = 200mm
2
Av = 2336.56 mm
iii) Vertical Reinforcement Calculated as per IRC 112 clause 10.3.2
Area of main Reinforcement due to Shear Calculated at bearing centre

Av = 6 Legged 10 φ @ 200 mm c/c
2.3.3 TOP HORIZONTAL TIE REINFORCEMENT (MAIN REINFORCEMENT)
The main Horizontal Reinforcement is maximum of the following

a) Calculated from Strut & Tie During Service & Bearing Replacement Condition
b) Calculated from Deep Beam Theory Calculated During Service and Bearing Replacement Condition
2.3.3.1 Reinforcement Due to Strut & Tie Action

2
Tie Reinforcement Ast Main Tie = 7010 mm Service Condition
2
3509 mm Jacking Condition
Provide 32 mm dia 9 nos.

32 mm dia nos.
2
Ast provided= 7238.2 mm HENCE OK
2.3.3.2 Reinforcement Due to Deep Beam Theory
2
Tie Reinforcement Ast Main Tie = 2941 mm
Reinforcement Due to Flexure Design
2
Page 29


kN kN kN kNm
1 Self Weight 4159 4667 8826 1270 8826 -1270
2 SIDL (CB) 301 324 626 58 626 -58
3 SSIDL (WC) 227 244 471 43 471 -43
4 3-CLASS A -396 1415 1019 4529 MVmax3A-Fz55

6 1-CLASS70R -475 1432 957 4768 MVmax1-70R-Fz55
7 2-CLASS A -350 862 512 3032 MVmax2-A-Fz55
9 SV 1343 1699 3043 890 SV(all)

1) Class A = 1.15
Page 31

kN kN kN kNm
5 1-CLASS 70R+1-CLASS A x I.F. -252 1818 1567 5175 MVmax1-70R+1-A-Fz23
kN kNm
3.3.2 WIND LOAD
A) With Live Load-
Superstructure :
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 36 m/s
For Live Load
36m/s 20.596 254.678

Gust Factor G 2

Force
2
Page 32

Area 357.7 m2
Lever Arm Break Up
Height
of mid
crash Thickness
barrier of
ht Downstand
crash bearing
barrier
1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1


Superstructure :
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 47 m/s
For Live Load
47m/s 26.890 434.092

Gust Factor G 2

Force
2
Page 33

Area 357.7 m2
Lever Arm Break Up
Height
of
crash mid
barrier height of
ht bearing
crash
barrier
1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1



kN kN kN kNm
2 Wind Load- Transverse (With Live Load) 54 -52 1 264 WIND TRANSVERSE-with LL
4 Wind Load- Transverse (Without Live Load) 91 -89 2 450 WIND TRANSVERSE-without LL
3.3.3 SEISMIC LOAD

Ah = 0.360

Vertical Seismic

Av = 0.24
Page 34

Reaction
Vertical Lever Arm
Loads (From V X Ah
Midas)
kN kN m
Dead Load 22858 8229 1.243
SIDL - CB 1599 576 2.550
SIDL - WC 1204 434 1.975
Live Load (Max) 660 238 3.200

Loads
kN m kN.m
Dead Load 105 -0.707 -74.60
SIDL - CB 7 0.600 4.43
SIDL - WC 6 0.025 0.14
Live Load 3 1.250 3.81
Transverse
kN kN
SIDL - WC 1204 289
Live Load 660 158

Ah = 0.2275
Page 35

kN kN
SIDL - CB 1599 364
SIDL - WC 1204 274

kN m kN.m
Dead Load 66.67 -0.707 -47.15
SIDL - CB 4.66 0.600 2.80
SIDL - WC 3.51 0.025 0.09

Longitudinal

No. kN kN kN kNm
1 Vertical Seismic Load -1270 1309 39 6449 EQv
2 Transverse Seismic Load 2 -86 -84 221 EQT
3 Londitudinal Seismic Load 1114 1216 2330 254 EQL

SLS-Q 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC) \
Page 36

250
535
6400
1175 1500
800
5000
Page 37

= 1.5 x 1.7 x 25
= 63.75 kN/m UDL

= 1.5 x 0.535 x 25
= 20.06 kN/m UDL

a) 1.5 x 0.25 x 25
= 9.375 kN/m UDL
iii) SIDL-CB
= 10.25 x 1.5
= 15.38 KN
iv) SSIDL-WC
= 1.25 x 1.5
= 1.875 kN/m
Page 38


bef = α.a(1 - a / lo ) + b1
Along traffic
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 0.23 = 0.34 m For Class 70R(W)
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 4.57 = 4.68 m For Class 70R(T)

Class A = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.5
= 1.108 m
Class 70 RW = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.86
= 1.468 m
Class 70 RT = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.84
= 1.448 m
Clearance
Class A = 150 + 250
= 400 mm
Class 70 R(T) = 1200 + 430

= 1630 mm
Class 70 R(W) = 1200 + 420

= 1620 mm
Impact Factors
I.F = 4.5
6 + L

beam = 0.25

beam = 0.25
Page 39
Class A
2
Class70 R(W)
2
Class70 R(T)
2
A) First wheel
bef1 = 1.2 x 1.78 + 0.36 W1 = 57 x 1.56
= 2.5 m > 1.20
= 1.84 m For 1m wide = 48.3 kN/m
B) Second wheel
bef2 = 2.6 x 0.03 x ( 1 - 0.025 ) + 0.36 W2 = 57 x 1.41
= 0.4 m < 1.20
C) Third wheel
bef3 = 2.6 x 1.73 x ( 1 - 1.73 ) + 0.36 W3 = 57 x 1.41
= 3.3 m > 1.20
D) Fourth wheel
bef4 = 2.6 x 3.53 x ( 1 - 3.53 ) + 0.36 W4 = 57 x 1.41
= 3.1 m > 1.20
Page 40
VED- VED- VED- VED-

2300 2300
Loading Table
VED- VED- VED- VED-
Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[23]+R[28] 8826 1270 1975 1732 1732 1732 1657
5 WIND TRANSVERSE-without LL R[23]+R[28] 2 450 57 0 0 0 -56
7 WIND TRANSVERSE-with LL R[23]+R[28] 1 264 33 0 0 0 -33
8 Vertical Seismic Load EqV R[23]+R[28] 39 6449 814 8 8 8 -798
10 Londitudinal Seismic Load R[23]+R[28] 2330 254 511 457 457 457 448
Live Load Cases

11 3-CLASS A x I.F. R[23]+R[28] 1171 4947 859 230 230 230 -377
Page 41
1 2 3 4 5
Fig 30.Locations at which results are extracted
( Refer the
STAAD FILE)
Node 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LC1 -38 -3701 -3750 5219 0 4939 3283 3234 38
LC2 -38 -3949 -3997 5469 0 5035 3275 3227 38
LC3 -38 -4830 -4878 5854 0 4157 2050 2002 38
LC4 -149 -4559 -4788 5747 0 3976 2114 2066 38
LC5 -38 -4780 -4828 5611 0 3664 1583 1535 38
LC6 -38 -2338 -2386 4124 0 5078 3977 3929 38
LC7 -38 -3935 -3984 5082 0 4116 2374 2325 38
LC8 -38 -3203 -3251 4636 0 4541 3092 3044 38
LC9 -38 -4462 -4510 5830 0 4859 2891 2843 38
LC10 -38 -3729 -3777 5384 0 5283 3609 3561 38
M
M2 M3 M4 M4 M3 M2 M1
Analysis Results (Bending Moment) M 1 Left Middl
e5
Node 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LC1 29 109 3086 5733 -1533 5033 2713 109 29
LC2 29 109 3284 6105 -1589 5021 2707 109 29
LC3 29 109 3989 7426 -1511 3184 1727 109 29
LC4 59 307 4110 7483 -1218 3280 1778 109 29
LC5 29 109 3949 7351 -1394 2483 1353 109 29
LC6 29 109 1995 3688 -1381 6074 3268 109 29
LC7 29 109 3274 6084 -1383 3669 1986 109 29
LC8 29 109 2688 4985 -1379 4746 2560 109 29
LC9 29 109 3695 6873 -1618 4446 2400 109 29
LC10 29 109 3108 5774 -1614 5523 2974 109 29
SLS Rare 3.4.3 SLS Rare Load Combinations 21 80 2844 5293 -1533 2414 1309 80 21
SLS Quasi 21 80 1922 3564 -1533 3047 1646 80 21
Page 42

D = 1.95 m
Span to Depth = 5.00 / 1.95 l = 5 m

2
For M50 concrete fck = 50 N/mm
2
fcd = 22.3 N/mm
= 1519 mm
reinforce 32 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c + 6
Ec1 Short Term = 35000 N/mm2

Contribution of LL in moment = 0.327
Contribution of DL in moment = 0.673
Creep Long Term = 1.946 From Doc SC-960-S-B3-DN-5201
Ec2 Long Term = 15150 N/mm2
Es = 200000 N/mm2
Short Term Long Term

Depth of concrete in compression
2
dc =(-AsEs+Sqrt((AsEs) +2bEsEceffdeff)) = 349.5 mm 498.4 mm
Moment of inertia of cracked section in steel units
I=As(d-dc)2+Eceffdb3/(3Es) = 2.4E+10 mm4 2E+10 mm4
σc at the top of the section σ=(M/z)*(Eceff/Es) = 13.66 N/mm2 9.91 N/mm2
Permissible stress' = 24 Hence ok 24 Hence ok
σs=isMcalculated
Stress in R/F ed/Z as = 278.19 N/mm2 287.86 N/mm2
Permissibleσstress
sp in steel = 300 Hence ok 300 Hence ok
Page 43
Check For Sresses considering Quasipermenant combination

Check for stresses assuming short term creep elastic modulus
Maximum moment from quasistatic combination = 3564 kN.m
Depth of compression = 349 mm
Moment of inertia of cracked section = 2.4E+10 mm4
σc at the top of the section
Concrete stress = 9.20 N/mm2
Permissible stress (0.36fck) = 24 Hence ok
σs=isMcalculated
Stress in R/F Ed/Z as = 187.34 N/mm2
Permissibleσstress
s = 300 Hence ok
Check for stresses assuming creep has taken place

Effective modulus of elasticity of concrete = 15150 N/mm2
Concrete stress at the top fibre σc = 15.42 N/mm2
σs=isMcalculated
Permissibleσstress
s = 300 Hence ok
Check for crack width

Crack width as per clause 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011 in Quasistatic combination
Concrete stress at bottom fibre =
Crack widthWk = = Srmax (ξsm - ξcm)

(ξsm - ξcm) = [σsc - kt fct / ppeff (1+ αe ppeff)]/Es > (0.6 σsc)/Es
Stess in tension R/F in cracked sec σsc = 220.2 N/mm2

Factor for duration of load kt = 0.5
Tensile strength of concrete fct = 3.50 N/mm2
Modular ratio αe = 13.20
Thickness of tension zone shall be minimum of
i] 2.5 (h-d), ii] (h-x)/3, iii] h/2) = 263 mm
Net tension area = 393750 mm2
Area of steel provided = 12868 mm2
R/F to area ratio peff=As/Ac eff = 0.0327
Clear cover to R/F = 45 mm
Diameter of main reinforcement = 32.00 mm
Srmax [3.4 C] +[ 0.425 k1k2ɸ]/peff = 319.46 mm
(ξsm - ξcm) = 0.0007
[(0.6 σsc)/Es] = 0.000661
Crack widthWobtained
k = 0.22925
mm
Permissible crack width for RCC section = 0.3 Hence ok

Maximum of :
i] 0.0013 bt X d,
Astmin = 4354 mm2 < 12868 mm2
Hence Ok
Page 44
Mu = 307 kN.m
2
Astreq = 1620.83 mm
2
= 3217 mm
Analysis Results
FED
Sr
Load Case (Shear Force) FED 1 FED 2 FED 3 FED 4 Middl FED 4 FED 3 FED 2 FED 1
no
Left Left Left Left e5 Right Right Right Right
1) Bearing Replacement Condition -37.882 -3101 -3150 4362.2 0 2745.4 2682.6 2634 37.882
M
Sr
Load Case (Bending Moment) M2 M3 M4 Middl M4 M3 M2 M1
no
M 1 Left Left Left Left e5 Right Right Right Right
1) Bearing Replacement Condition 28.707 109 2606 4833.2 -1261 4132.6 2232.8 109 28.707

D = 1.95
Span to Depth = 3.30 / 1.95 l = 3.3
As per IS 456 , cl. 29.2
z = 0.2 ( l+ 1.5 D) when 1 < l/D < 2
60 % 0.2D
0.3D
0.87 fy Z 1950 mm 40 % 1170 mm
= 4833187000 0.3D
541575
0.2D
= 8924 mm2 390 mm
1.5 mm

2
2
Page 45
2
2
The Reinforcement shall be distributed upto mm2/mm

Asv = 2.262

d

d
= 1.35 b = 1500 mm
d = 1595 mm
ρ1 = Asw ≤ 0.02
b.d
= 5320
1500 x 1595
= 0.0022 ≤ 0.02
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement VRd.c is given by:
0.33
νmin = [ 0.12 K (80ρ1.fck) ] As per IRC 112-2011 Cl 10.3.2
= [ 0.12 x 1.35 ( 80 x 0.0022 x 50 )^0.33 ]
= 0.334
νmin = 0.031.K3/2fck1/2
= 0.031 x 1.35 ^3/2 x 50 ^1/2
= 0.345

= 0.345 x 1500 x 1595
Page 46

Design Shear
VNS = 4878 kN
bw x z
= 4878 x 1000
1500 x 1436
= 2.266
θ = 0.5 sin
-1 vNS
0.134 fck [ fck /
1 - 310
θ = 0.5 sin
-1 0.4032
θ = 11.55 < 21.8 take Cot θ as 2.5
(12 dia+16 dia)
s
A sw = 3.14 x 12 x 12 x 6
4
= 678.58 mm2
s = 678.58 x 1435.5 x 435 x 2.5
4878.28 x 1000
= 217 mm

fyk
= 0.072 x 7.07107
500
pmin = 0.00102
Minimum Area of shear reinforcement assume
Asw = pmin
bt x s
Asw = 0.00102 x 1500 x 1000
= 1527.4 mm²

(cot θ + tan θ)
αcw = 1
z = 0.9d = 1435.5 mm
ν1 = 0.6 x [1-fck /310] = 0.60
fcd = 22.3

SAFE
Page 47
2300 2300
2300 2300

VED- VED-
VED- VED-
OUTER- VED- OUTER-
INNER- INNER-
LEFT CENTER RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT
2300 2300
Page 48
VED- VED- VED- VED-

Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[23]+R[28] 8826 1270 1975 1732 1732 1732 1657
5 WIND TRANSVERSE-without LL R[23]+R[28] 2 450 57 0 0 0 -56
8 Vertical Seismic Load EqV R[23]+R[28] 39 6449 814 8 8 8 -798
Live Load Cases

10 3-Class A x 1.F. R[23]+R[28] 1171 4947 859 230 230 230 -377

SLS Rare)
SLS Quasi)
SLS-Q 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC)
Page 49
FT1
FT2
FC1
FC2
RA FC3 RB
T= Tension (-)
C= Compression (+)
ULS Load Combiation

Node 15 Node 16
Beam
16 32 20 29 23
No.
LC1 -3489 -2601 5034 5614 153 8624 7876
LC2 -3727 -2799 5377 5894 236 9120 7965
LC3 -4574 -3612 6599 6327 925 10387 5862
LC4 -4206 -3302 6069 5921 779 9643 5833
LC5 -4526 -3615 6529 6053 1061 10093 4901
LC6 -2178 -1452 3142 4382 -520 6164 8710
LC7 -3714 -2871 5358 5460 526 8720 6144
LC8 -3009 -2222 4342 4958 52 7542 7287
LC9 -4220 -3242 6088 6300 529 9994 7404
LC10 -3515 -2593 5072 5798 55 8815 8547

SLS-R -3256 -2563 4697 4548 627 7432 4362

SLS-Q -2148 -1607 3098 3429 113 5285 4733
Page 50
2
fcd = 0.67/1.5 x fck fctm = 3.52 N/mm
2
= 22.33 N/mm

For ULS Case Ast = FT / (0.87 x fyk) = 10515 mm2
For SLS Rare Case Ast = FT / (0.6 x fyk) = 10852 mm2
Page 51
VED- VED- VED- VED-

OUTER- VED- INNER-
INNER- OUTER-
LEFT CENTER RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT
2300 2300
VED- VED- VED- VED-

Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[23]+R[28] 8826 1270 1975 1732 1732 1732 1657
FT1
FT2
FC1
FC2

Beam
16 32 20 29 23 Node 15 Node 16
No.
LC101 -2912 -2178.22 4201.2 4650 152.682 7166 6419

fcd = 0.67/1.5 x fck
= 22.33 N/mm2

650 x 1500 Hence OK
Ast = FT / (0.87 x fyk) = 6693.97 mm2
Page 52
2
Acl = 1065 x 1065 = 1134225 mm
Aco = 700 x 700 = 490000 mm2
fcd = 22.33 N/mm2
FRdu = 16650 kN > 10387 kN
Hence OK
are dispersed.
F 10387 kN
2

2
= 14726 mm

Total maximum unfactored transverse Seismic Force for one span 2895 kN

A Tie Back = FT /(0.87 x 500)
= 9383.8 mm2
25 mm dia 0 x 1 no
Ast provided= 9651 mm2 HENCE OK
Page 53

D 1700 mm

2
Ah = 0.25 x 6729 = 1682 mm

2
Ah = 3604 mm
2
Ah = 10210.2 mm
Hence Ah = 0.0044 > 0.003

b x Sh Hence OK
Page 54

2

Av = 6 Legged 10 φ @ 208.33 mm c/c

No of Stirrups = 15nos.
2
Av = 2336.56 mm

Av = 6 Legged 12.000 φ @ 200 mm c/c


2
Tie Reinforcement Ast Main Tie = 10851.9 mm Service Condition
2

32 mm dia 4 nos.
2
Ast provided= 11259 mm HENCE OK
2
2
Page 55


kN kN kN kNm
1 Self Weight 4179 4286 8465 267
2 SIDL (CB) 278 277 555 2
3 SSIDL (WC) 209 209 418 1
4 3-CLASS A -396 1415 1019 4529 MVmax3A-Fz68

6 1-CLASS70R -475 1432 957 4768 MVmax1-70R-Fz68
7 2-CLASS A -350 862 512 3032 MVmax2-A-Fz68
9 SV 637 812 1449 439 SV(all)

1) Class A = 1.15
Page 56

kN kN kN kNm
5 1-CLASS 70R+1-CLASS A x I.F. -183 1812 1629 4988 MVmax1-70R+1-A-Fz68
kN kNm
5.3.2 WIND LOAD
A) With Live Load-
Superstructure :
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 36 m/s
For Live Load
36m/s 20.596 254.678

Gust Factor G 2

Force
2
Page 57

Area 357.7 m2
Lever Arm Break Up
Height
of mid
crash Thickness
barrier of
ht Downstand
crash bearing
barrier
1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1


Superstructure :
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 47 m/s
For Live Load
47m/s 26.890 434.092

Gust Factor G 2

Force
2
Page 58

Area 357.7 m2
Lever Arm Break Up
Height
of
crash mid
barrier height of
ht bearing
crash
barrier
1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1



kN kN kN kNm
2 Wind Load- Transverse (With Live Load) -51 50 0 253 WIND TRANSVERSE-with LL
4 Wind Load- Transverse (Without Live Load) -87 86 -1 432 WIND TRANSVERSE-without LL
5.3.3 SEISMIC LOAD

Sa/g= 2.500
Ah = 0.360

Vertical Seismic
Sa/g= 2.5

Av = 0.24
Page 59

Reaction
Vertical Lever Arm
Loads (From V X Ah
Midas)
kN kN m
Dead Load 22858 8229 1.243
SIDL - CB 1599 576 2.550
SIDL - WC 1204 434 1.975
Live Load (Max) 660 238 3.200

Loads
kN m kN.m
Dead Load 105 -0.707 -74.60
SIDL - CB 7 0.600 4.43
SIDL - WC 6 0.025 0.14
Live Load 3 1.250 3.81
Transverse
kN kN
SIDL - WC 1204 289
Live Load 660 158

Ah = 0.2275
Page 60

kN kN
SIDL - CB 1599 364
SIDL - WC 1204 274

kN m kN.m
Dead Load 66.67 -0.707 -47.15
SIDL - CB 4.66 0.600 2.80
SIDL - WC 3.51 0.025 0.09

Longitudinal

No. kN kN kN kNm
1 Vertical Seismic Load -1236 1228 -7 6159 EQv
2 Transverse Seismic Load 234 87 321 366 EQT
3 Londitudinal Seismic Load 1057 1122 2179 162 EQL

SLS-Q 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC) \
Page 61

250
535
6400
1175 1500
800
5000
Page 62

= 1.5 x 1.7 x 25 (Taking Conservatively width as 1.5m)
= 63.75 kN/m UDL

= 1.5 x 0.535 x 25
= 20.06 kN/m UDL

a) 1.5 x 0.25 x 25
= 9.375 kN/m UDL
iii) SIDL-CB
= 10.25 x 1.5
= 15.38 KN
iv) SSIDL-WC
= 1.25 x 1.5
= 1.875 kN/m


bef = α.a(1 - a / lo ) + b1
Along traffic
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 0.23 = 0.34 m For Class 70R(W)
b1 = 0.054 x 2 + 4.57 = 4.68 m For Class 70R(T)
Page 63

Class A = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.5
= 1.108 m
Class 70 RW = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.86
= 1.468 m
Class 70 RT = 2*(0.054+0.25)+0.84
= 1.448 m
Clearance
Class A = 150 + 250
= 400 mm
Class 70 R(T) = 1200 + 430

= 1630 mm
Class 70 R(W) = 1200 + 420

= 1620 mm
Impact Factors
I.F = 4.5
6 + L

beam = 0.25

beam = 0.25
Class A
2
Class70 R(W)
2
Class70 R(T)
2
A) First wheel
bef1 = 1.2 x 1.78 + 0.36 W1 = 57 x 1.56
= 2.5 m > 1.20
= 1.84 m For 1m wide = 48.3 kN/m
B) Second wheel
bef2 = 2.6 x 0.03 x ( 1 - 0.025 ) + 0.36 W2 = 57 x 1.41
= 0.4 m < 1.20
C) Third wheel
bef3 = 2.6 x 1.73 x ( 1 - 1.73 ) + 0.36 W3 = 57 x 1.41
= 3.3 m > 1.20
Page 64
D) Fourth wheel
bef4 = 2.6 x 3.53 x ( 1 - 3.53 ) + 0.36 W4 = 57 x 1.41
= 3.1 m > 1.20
VED- VED- VED- VED-

2300 2300
Loading Table
VED- VED- VED- VED-
Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[43]+R[48] 8465 267 1775 1661 1661 1661 1708
8 Vertical Seismic Load EqV R[43]+R[48] -7 6159 768 -1 -1 -1 -771
9 Transverse Seismic Load EqT R[43]+R[48] 321 366 112 63 63 63 20
Live Load Cases

11 3-CLASS A x I.F. R[43]+R[48] 1143 4884 846 224 224 224 -375
Page 65

1 2 3 4 5
Fig 42. Locations at which results are extracted
( Refer the
STAAD FILE)
Node 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LC1 -38 -3374 -3422 4908 0 4854 3332 3283 38
LC2 -38 -3180 -3228 4579 0 4449 3011 2963 38
LC3 -38 -4485 -4533 5525 0 4062 2095 2047 38
LC4 -149 -4208 -4437 5411 0 3882 2165 2117 38
LC5 -38 -4408 -4456 5279 0 3621 1692 1644 38
LC6 -38 -2104 -2152 3899 0 5010 4005 3957 38
LC7 -38 -3719 -3767 4924 0 4177 2523 2475 38
LC8 -38 -3028 -3076 4510 0 4594 3217 3168 38
LC9 -38 -4093 -4141 5481 0 4767 2951 2903 38
LC10 -38 -3402 -3450 5067 0 5184 3645 3597 38
M
M2 M3 M4 M4 M3 M2 M1
Analysis Results (Bending Moment) M 1 Left Midd
le 5
Node 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LC1 29 109 2824 5242 -1471 5106 2752 109 29
LC2 29 109 2669 4951 -1355 4625 2495 109 29
LC3 29 109 3713 6909 -1445 3251 1763 109 29
LC4 59 307 3829 6957 -1150 3357 1819 109 29
LC5 29 109 3651 6793 -1336 2647 1440 109 29
LC6 29 109 1808 3337 -1335 6117 3291 109 29
LC7 29 109 3100 5759 -1367 3893 2105 109 29
LC8 29 109 2547 4723 -1367 4934 2660 109 29
LC9 29 109 3399 6320 -1549 4535 2448 109 29
LC10 29 109 2847 5283 -1549 5576 3003 109 29
SLS Rare 3.4.3 SLS Rare Load Combinations 21 80 2642 4914 -1471 2465 1336 80 21
SLS Quasi 21 80 1729 3202 -1471 3102 1675 80 21

D = 1.95 m
Span to Depth = 5.00 / 1.95 l = 5 m
Page 66

For M50 concrete fck = 50 N/mm2
fcd = 22.3 N/mm2
= 1517 mm
reinforce 32 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c + 6
Ec1 Short Term = 35000 N/mm2

Contribution of LL in moment = 0.348
Contribution of DL in moment = 0.652
Creep Long Term = 1.946 From Doc SC-960-S-B3-DN-5201
Ec2 Long Term = 15432 N/mm2
Es = 200000 N/mm2
Short Term Long Term

Depth of concrete in compression
dc =(-AsEs+Sqrt((AsEs)2+2bEsEceffdeff)) = 365.9 mm 516.3 mm
Moment of inertia of cracked section in steel units
I=As(d-dc)2+Eceffdb3/(3Es) = 2.3E+10 mm4 2E+10 mm4
σc at the top of the section σ=(M/z)*(Eceff/Es) = 13.51 N/mm2 9.91 N/mm2
Permissible stress' = 24 Hence ok 24 Hence ok
σs=isMcalculated
Stress in R/F ed/Z as = 259.24 N/mm2 268.37 N/mm2
Permissibleσstress
sp in steel = 300 Hence ok 300 Hence ok
Check For Sresses considering Quasipermenant combination

Check for stresses assuming short term creep elastic modulus
Maximum moment from quasistatic combination = 3202 kN.m
Concrete stress at the top of the section σc = 8.80 N/mm2
σs=isMcalculated
Permissibleσstress
s = 300 Hence ok
Check for stresses assuming creep has taken place

Effective modulus of elasticity of concrete = 15432 N/mm2
Concrete stress at the top fibre = 14.65 N/mm2
Permissible stress (0.36fck) σc = 24 Hence ok
σs=isMcalculated
Permissibleσstress
s = 300 Hence ok
Check for crack width

Crack width as per clause 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011 in Quasistatic combination
Concrete stress at bottom fibre =
Crack widthWk = = Srmax (ξsm - ξcm)

(ξsm - ξcm) = [σsc - kt fct / ppeff (1+ αe ppeff)]/Es > (0.6 σsc)/Es
Page 67
Stess in tension R/F in cracked sec σsc = 199.3 N/mm2

Factor for duration of load kt = 0.5
Tensile strength of concrete fct = 3.50 N/mm2
Modular ratio αe = 12.96
Thickness of tension zone shall be minimum of
i] 2.5 (h-d), ii] (h-x)/3, iii] h/2) = 263 mm
Net tension area = 354375 mm2
Area of steel provided = 12868 mm2
R/F to area ratio peff=As/Ac eff = 0.0363
Clear cover to R/F = 45 mm
Diameter of main reinforcement = 32.00 mm
Srmax [3.4 C] +[ 0.425 k1k2ɸ]/peff = 302.81 mm
(ξsm - ξcm) = 0.0006
[(0.6 σsc)/Es] = 0.000598
Crack widthWobtained
k = 0.19441
mm
Permissible crack width for RCC section = 0.3 Hence ok

Maximum of :
i] 0.0013 bt X d,
Astmin = 3919 mm2 < 12868 mm2
Hence Ok
Mu = 307 kN.m
2
Astreq = 1625.44 mm
2
= 3217 mm
Analysis Results
FED
Sr
Load Case (Shear Force) FED 1 FED 2 FED 3 FED 4 Midd FED 4 FED 3 FED 2 FED 1
no
Left Left Left Left le 5 Right Right Right Right
1) Bearing Replacement Condition -37.882 -2774 -2822 4050.8 0 2794 2731.5 2683 37.88
M
Sr
Load Case (Bending Moment) M2 M3 M4 Midd M4 M3 M2 M1
no
M 1 Left Left Left Left le 5 Right Right Right Right
1) Bearing Replacement Condition 28.707 109 2344 4341.6 -1199 4206 2271.9 109 28.71
Page 68

D = 1.95
Span to Depth = 3.30 / 1.95 l = 3.3
As per IS 456 , cl. 29.2
z = 0.2 ( l+ 1.5 D) when 1 < l/D < 2
60 % 0.2D
0.3D
0.87 fy Z 1950 mm 40 % 1170 mm
= 4341636000 0.3D
541575
0.2D
= 8017 mm2 390 mm
1.4 mm

2
2
2
2
The Reinforcement shall be distributed upto mm2/mm

Asv = 2.135

d

d
= 1.35 b = 1350 mm
d = 1595 mm
ρ1 = Asw ≤ 0.02
b.d
= 4779
1350 x 1595
= 0.0022 ≤ 0.02
Page 69
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement V Rd.c is given by:
νmin = [ 0.12 K (80ρ1.fck)0.33 ] As per IRC 112-2011 Cl 10.3.2
= [ 0.12 x 1.35 ( 80 x 0.0022 x 50 )^0.33 ]
= 0.334
νmin = 0.031.K3/2fck1/2
= 0.031 x 1.35 ^3/2 x 50 ^1/2
= 0.345

= 0.345 x 1350 x 1595
Design Shear
VNS = 4533 kN
bw x z
= 4533 x 1000
1350 x 1436
= 2.339
θ = 0.5 sin-1 vNS

0.134 fck [ 1 - fck / 310
θ = 0.5 sin-1 0.4163
θ = 11.93 < 21.8 take Cot θ as 2.5

s
A sw = 3.14 x 12 x 12 x 6
4
= 678.58 mm2
s = 678.58 x 1435.5 x 435 x 2.5
4533.48 x 1000
= 234 mm

fyk
= 0.072 x 7.07107
500
pmin = 0.00102
Minimum Area of shear reinforcementassume
Asw = pmin
bt x s
Asw = 0.00102 x 1350 x 1000
= 1374.6 mm²

(cot θ + tan θ)
αcw = 1
z = 0.9d = 1435.5 mm
ν1 = 0.6 x [1-fck /310] = 0.60
fcd = 22.3

SAFE
Page 70
2300 2300
2300 2300

VED- VED-
VED- VED-
OUTER- VED- OUTER-
INNER- INNER-
LEFT CENTER RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT
2300 2300
VED- VED- VED- VED-

Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[43]+R[48] 8465 267 1775 1661 1661 1661 1708
8 Vertical Seismic Load EqV R[43]+R[48] -7 6159 768 -1 -1 -1 -771
9 Transverse Seismic Load EqT R[43]+R[48] 321 366 112 63 63 63 20
Page 71
Live Load Cases

10 3-Class A x 1.F. R[43]+R[48] 1143 4884 846 224 224 224 -375

SLS Rare)
SLS Quasi)
SLS-Q 1.0 (SW) + 1.0 (CB) + 1.2 (WC)
FT1
FT2
FC1
FC2
RA FC3 RB
T= Tension (-)
C= Compression (+)
ULS Load Combiation

Node 15 Node 16
Beam
16 32 20 29 23
No.
LC1 -3174 -2336 4579 5264 30 7985 7840
LC2 -2987 -2211 4310 4894 71 7461 7114
LC3 -4242 -3335 6121 5957 797 9713 5811
LC4 -3869 -3018 5582 5545 647 8957 5790
LC5 -4168 -3310 6013 5681 904 9390 4968
LC6 -1953 -1263 2817 4129 -606 5705 8670
LC7 -3506 -2685 5058 5282 407 8346 6355
LC8 -2841 -2071 4099 4816 -46 7240 7466
LC9 -3865 -2944 5576 5908 389 9276 7373
LC10 -3200 -2330 4618 5442 -64 8171 8484
Page 72

SLS-R -3013 -2359 4347 4277 534 6939 4327

SLS-Q -1916 -1411 2764 3172 22 4815 4708
fcd = 0.67/1.5 x fck fctm = 3.52 N/mm2

= 22.33 N/mm2

For ULS Case Ast = FT / (0.87 x fyk) = 9752.8 mm2
For SLS Rare Case Ast = FT / (0.6 x fyk) = 10042 mm2
Page 73
VED- VED- VED- VED-

OUTER- VED- INNER-
INNER- OUTER-
LEFT CENTER RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT
2300 2300
VED- VED- VED- VED-

Sr Shear VED-
no Force CENTRE
& Node Fz Mx
1 Self Weight R[43]+R[48] 8465 267 1775 1661 1661 1661 1708
FT1
FT2
FC1
FC2

Beam
16 32 20 29 23 Node 15 Node 16
No.
LC101 -2597 -1913.32 3746.6 4300 29.563 6527 6383

fcd = 0.67/1.5 x fck
= 22.33 N/mm2

650 x 1350 Hence OK

Ast = FT / (0.87 x fyk) = 5970 mm2
Page 74
Acl = 1065 x 1065 = 1134225 mm2

Aco = 700 x 700 = 490000 mm2
2
fcd = 22.33 N/mm
FRdu = 16650 kN > 9713 kN
Hence OK
are dispersed.
F 9713 kN
2

2
= 14726 mm

Total maximum unfactored transverse Seismic Force for one span 1521 kN [99 x [26.29/2]]
A Tie Back = FT /(0.87 x 500)

= 4930.5 mm2
25 mm dia 0 x 1 no
Ast provided= 7238.2 mm2 HENCE OK
Page 75

D 1700 mm

2
Ah = 0.25 x 6351 = 1588 mm

2
Ah = 3238 mm
2
Ah = 6534.51 mm
Hence Ah = 0.0031 > 0.003

b x Sh Hence OK

2

Av = 6 Legged 10 φ @ 220.75 mm c/c

No of Stirrups = 15nos.
2
Av = 2336.56 mm

Av = 6 Legged 12 φ @ 200 mm c/c

Page 76

2
Tie Reinforcement Ast Main Tie = 10042.3 mm Service Condition
2

32 mm dia 0 nos.
2
Ast provided= 7238.2 mm HENCE NOT OK
2
2
Page 77
7 DESIGN OF PROJECTION BELOW DIAPHRAGM At Pier P462

400 VARIES FROM 12000 TO 13350
Transverse Seismic Arrestor
Fig 49. Cross section of projection
7.1 DATA
Grade of concrete 50 MPa
Cylinder Strength of concrete 40 MPa
Yield strength of Rebar 500 MPa
Total Width of Seismic arrestor 1200 mm
Overlap during Load Action 1200 mm
Eccentricity from face of slab a= 354 mm
Depth of projection D= 400 mm
Effective cover to Main Rlf. C= 82.5 mm 45+25+25/2
Effective Depth d= 317.5 mm
Design Depth = 0.8 x d 254 mm
Width of projection b= 1200 mm
Page 78
Load due to transverse seismic

Seismic Zone Z 0.24
I 1.2
Sa/g 2.5 (Taking Connservatively)
R 3
Ah 0.12
Total unfactored transverse Seismic Force for one span= W= 1032 kN

P= W [(22858+1599+1204+660)/(Tot.Span-78.007)] 1032 kN
x [(span2:- 25.922/2+Span3:- 25.045/2)] x Ah
Vu = 1.5 x P 1548 kN
Seismic force transferred 1548 kN
7.2 CONCRETE STRESS CHECK

0.15*fc' 6 MPa
Vu 1548 kN
Max. Shear stress 5.08 MPa
Permissible Stress = 6 MPa
Hence Compressive stress < Hence OK
7.3 REINFORCEMENT CALCULATION

H 0 kN
2
Af= [Vu*a + Hu*(h-d')] = 4060 mm
0.85 * fsy *d
2
Avf= Vu = 2601 mm
0.85 * fsy *μ
2
At= Hu = 0 mm
0.85 * fsy
7.4 CALCULATION OF PRIMARY TENSILE REINFORCEMENT

Maximum of -
2
Af+At = 4060 mm
2
2/3Avf+At = 1734 mm
2
0.04*fc'/fsy*b*d' = 1219 mm
2
As (required) = 4060 mm
Provide 10.00 No.s 25 Dia.

2
As (provided) = 4909 mm
Page 79
7.5 CALCULATION OF HORIZONTAL STIRRUPS

Maximum of -
2
0.5Af = 2030 mm
2
0.333Avf = 866.2 mm
2
Ah = 2030 mm
These stirrups shall be provided within 2/3 rd of effective depth.
2/3 rd of effective depth = 211.7 mm

Provide 2 nos 25 dia @ 102.4 mm /c c
7.6 CALCULATION OF VERTICAL STIRRUPS
Vc= 10bd = 304.80 kN

Let pitch of the stirrups bw = 100 mm
2
Av= [0.5 * (Vu-Vc)* p /fsy*d] = 562.47 mm
Spacing p reqd. Av x fsy x d
=
0.5 x (Vu - Vc)
114.943 mm c/c
hence privide 20 mm dia stirrups with = 2 legged
2
Area of stirrups provided = 628 mm SAFE
Page 80
7 DESIGN OF PROJECTION BELOW DIAPHRAGM At Pier P461

400 VARIES FROM 12000 TO 13350
Longitudinal Seismic Arrestor
Fig 49. Cross section of projection
7.1 DATA
Grade of concrete 50 MPa
Cylinder Strength of concrete 40 MPa
Yield strength of Rebar 500 MPa
Total Width of Seismic arrestor 1200 mm
Overlap during Load Action 1200 mm
Eccentricity from face of slab a= 354 mm
Depth of projection D= 400 mm
Effective cover to Main Rlf. C= 82.5 mm 45+25+25/2
Effective Depth d= 317.5 mm
Design Depth = 0.8 x d 254 mm
Width of projection b= 1200 mm
Page 78
Load due to Longitudinal seismic

Seismic Zone Z 0.24
I 1.2
Sa/g 1.58 (Taking Connservatively)
R 3
Ah 0.0758
Total unfactored Longitudinal Seismic Force for one span= W= 1946 kN

P= W/2 973 kN
Vu = 1.5 x P 1460 kN
Seismic force transferred 1460 kN
7.2 CONCRETE STRESS CHECK

0.15*fc' 6 MPa
Vu 1460 kN
Max. Shear stress 4.79 MPa
Permissible Stress = 6 MPa
Hence Compressive stress < Hence OK
7.3 REINFORCEMENT CALCULATION

H 0 kN
2
Af= [Vu*a + Hu*(h-d')] = 3829 mm
0.85 * fsy *d
2
Avf= Vu = 2453 mm
0.85 * fsy *μ
2
At= Hu = 0 mm
0.85 * fsy
7.4 CALCULATION OF PRIMARY TENSILE REINFORCEMENT

Maximum of -
2
Af+At = 3829 mm
2
2/3Avf+At = 1635 mm
2
0.04*fc'/fsy*b*d' = 1219 mm
2
As (required) = 3829 mm
Provide 8.00 No.s 25 Dia.

2
As (provided) = 3927 mm
Page 79
7.5 CALCULATION OF HORIZONTAL STIRRUPS

Maximum of -
2
0.5Af = 1915 mm
2
0.333Avf = 816.9 mm
2
Ah = 1915 mm
These stirrups shall be provided within 2/3 rd of effective depth.
2/3 rd of effective depth = 211.7 mm

Provide 2 nos 25 dia @ 108.5 mm /c c
7.6 CALCULATION OF VERTICAL STIRRUPS
Vc= 10bd = 304.80 kN

Let pitch of the stirrups bw = 100 mm
2
Av= [0.5 * (Vu-Vc)* p /fsy*d] = 522.58 mm
Spacing p reqd. Av x fsy x d
=
0.5 x (Vu - Vc)
114.943 mm c/c
hence privide 20 mm dia stirrups with = 2 legged
2
Area of stirrups provided = 628 mm SAFE
Page 80
8 STABILITY CHECK FOR VOIDED SLAB SUPERSTRUCTURE
8.1 Design Data-

Span length= 76.007 m (At Reference Line of Alignment in m)
Span length= 78.007 m (At Centre of alignment in m)
Depth of voided slab= 1.7 m
Width of voided slab= 12 to 13.35 m
Bearing C/C in transverse direction= 5 m
Radius of curvature at centerline of box voided slab,R= 65.62 m
Design Speed of vehicle, V= 65 kmph
Design Speed of vehicle for SV, V= 5 kmph
Height of C.G. of vehicle above road = 1.2 m
Height of crash barrier= 1.1 m
Impact factor for Class A vehicle= 1.054 IRC 6 cl 208.2
Impact factor for Class 70R (W) vehicle= 1.054
Wearing Coat Thickness 0.05
m
3
Density of concrete = 25 kN/m
3
Density of wearing coat= 22 kN/m
2/3 eccentricity due to curvature 7.503 m 2/3 x (R x (1-Cos(L/(2R) x 180/π))
8.2 Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Equilibrium- IRC:6-2017 Table B.1
Left End Inner Reaction = R1L Outer Reaction = R2L

Right End Inner Reaction = R1R Outer Reaction = R2R
Case-1 DL+SIDL
Case-2 DL+SIDL+LL (Leading)+ WL @36m/s (Accompanying)
Case-3 DL+SIDL+LL (Accompanying)+ WL @36m/s (Leading)
Case-4 DL+SIDL+ SPV
Case-5(a) DL+SIDL+ LL+ (EQTrans +0.3 Eqv)
Case-5(b) DL+SIDL+LL + (0.3 EQTrans +1.0 Eqv)
Overturning and Restoring Moments shall be taken about outer bearing.
Page 81
Sr. No. Loads Overturning Effect IRC 6 Table B.1

Case-1 Case-2 Case-3 Case-4 Case-5
1 DL+SIDL (CB) 0 0 0 0 0
2 SIDL (WC) 0 0 0 0 0
Live Load: - 1.5 1.15 - 0.2
3
d) SPV - - - 1 -
4 Wind Load: - 0.9 1.5 - -
5 Seismic Load: - - - - 1.5
Sr. No. Loads Restoring Effect IRC 6 Table B.1

Case-1 Case-2 Case-3 Case-4 Case-5
1 DL+SIDL (CB) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
2 SIDL (WC) 1 1 1 1 1
Live Load: - - - - -
3
d) SPV - - - - -
Wind Load:
4
- - - - -
5 Seismic Load: - - - - -
8.3 Load Calculation-
3.1 Self Weight :
3
Self weight is calculated considering the concrete density of 25KN/m , command applied in midas civil.
Weight of Blisters has been added seperately
Total Dead load Comes out to be = 22858 kN
3.2 Superimposed loads:

The following assumptions is taken :
1 SIDL -CB (Crash Parapet) = 2 No's x 10.25 KN/m

= 20.5 kN/m
2
2 SSIDL - WC (Load Due to wearing Coat) = 12.35 m x 1.25 KN/m
= 15.4 kN/m
8.4 Live Load application in MIDAS
The Live Loads have been modelled in Midas Itself

The Span has been modelled in MIDAS and all loads have been applied.
Live Loads have been converted to equivalent static loads and for each nodal load corresponding transverse centrifugal
force along with its corresponding moment has been added.
Eccentricity for computing moment due to centrifugal force is evaluated in next section
Page 82
8.4.1 Centrifugal Force Calculation

The MCD Command file is extracted for Worst Overturning Condition (Total min Fz at support nodes on inner curve)
2
In these command files the horizontal force load due to centrifugal action has been added as W x V /(127 x R)
The Centrifugal Force acts at 1.254m from top of Box voided slab, this force has been added as equivalent Force
and moment as Ly (local) = -C.F kN (centrifugal force) and mx (local) = C.F x 1.25 at the respective points
received from MCT File. The Loads are then applied as stated below and the Values of Reactions Measured.
The Following Live Load cases extracted from MCT command shell are applied in MIDAS
a) Vertical Loads
LL(Vertical)1 Min1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R_I_My28
LL(Vertical)2 Max1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R_I_My43
b) Centrifugal Force
LL(CF)1 MCT For Load Case CF_Min1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R_I_My28
LL(CF)2 MCT For Load Case CF_Max1-CLASS A+1-CLASS 70R_I_My43
b) Combination
LL(Vertical)1 = Impact factor x LL(CF)1
LL(Vertical)2 = Impact factor x LL(CF)2
Break Up Calculation for Lever Arm.

+ 1.7 + 0.15 -0.707 0.050 1.20 0.1
Distance between mid
- C.G. at C.G of vehicle
Depth of bottom of voided Wearing height
support above wearing
voided slab slab and top of Coat thk of
from Top coat
bearing bearing
2
Centrifugal Force= WxV = W x 0.507 kN
(Excluding Impact) (127 x R x Impact Factor)
Eccentricity due to centrifugal force from + 3.2 m
Bearing Top
Eccentricity due to centrifugal force from Top + 1.25 m
of voided slab.
Note:- In Midas the voided slab has been modelled as line model and the cross sections assigned are such that
they have on center Top Offset. Thus, moment due to centrifugal force are evaluated using eccentricity of
vehicle from top of voided slab.
Page 83
8.5 Wind Load (WL) (Wind Load with LL has been considered since Wind Load without LL does not
govern for stability)
8.5.1 Superstructure :
Table 5.1
FOR 33 m/s
10 17.800 190
13.000 18.880 214.000
15 19.600 230
FOR 36 m/s
For Live Load 36m/s 20.596 254.678

Gust Factor G 2
8.5.2 Wind Load Vertical at 36m/s

Force Vertical Pressure
Design Vertical Wind Pressure 0.382 kN/m2
8.5.3 Wind Load Transverse at 36m/s

Lateral Wind CD 1.31533 for b/d 34.897/13.4 5.6934
Exposed Elevational AreaSpan 1 76.007 m
Depth 4.7 m voided slab + height of vehicle 2.5 + 3
Area 357.2 m2
Lever Arm Break Up
Height of mid
voided slab Wearing crash Thickness of
vehicle above height of
depth Coart barrier ht Downstand
crash barrier bearing
1.7 0.05 1.1 0.15 1.9 0.1

8.5.4 Wind Load Application in MIDAS
This wind Load has been applied on voided slab in Midas as UDL in Local y = 3.13 kN/m
as (Transverse Wind on Superstructure + wind on Live Load)/Span
This wind load acts on a point 0.25 m above the Box voided slab = 0.65 m = (5.5)/2-2.5.
Page 84
8.6 Seismic Load-

8.6.1 Horizontal Seismic Loads-
Ah = 0.36
8.6.2 Vertical Seismic Loads-

Vertical Seismic
Sa/g= 2.5

Av = 0.24
8.6.3 Transverse Seismic Force

Vertical
Reaction
Lever Arm
Loads (From V X Ah
about top of
Midas)
bearing
kN kN m
Dead Load 22858 8229 1.243
SIDL - CB 1599 576 2.500
SIDL - WC 1204 434 1.975
Live
Load 660 238 3.200
(Max)
The Transverse Seismic Force is Applied as UDL in MIDAL File as Follows
(V X Ah )/ Vertical Lever Arm Moment about top of

Loads
Span from Top of Box Box voided slab
kN m kN.m
Dead Load 105 -0.707 -74.60
SIDL - CB 7 0.600 4.43
SIDL - WC 6 0.025 0.14
Live Load 3 1.250 3.81
Transverse Seismic = 121 kN/m (Aplied in Midas as UDL LY(Local)

Force with Live Load @ -0.55 m below top of voided slab
8.6.4 Vertical Upward Seismic Loads-
kN kN
SIDL - CB 1599 384
SIDL - WC 1204 289
Live Load 196 47
Page 85
8.7 Results and Interpretation
Support Reaction at Support node no. 9, 28, 43, 63

ELL(min)
SSIDL- EQ
Node Self Weight SIDL-CB Wind Load EQ Trans LL(Vertic SPV
WC Upward
No al)2
Restoring Load kN Overturning Load kN
9 1369 93 70 -42 -547 -339 -348 490
28 3544 294 221 -89 -1270 -1114 -314 1349
43 4179 278 209 -87 -1236 -1057 -338 1312
63 1512 108 81 -39 -503 -403 -293 636.8
Restoring Overturning Factor Of Safety

Load Combination kN.m kN.m
moment Moment Against
Case 1 54102 - -
Case 2 54102 10854 4.98
Case 3 54102 9362 5.78
Case 4 54102 - -
Case 5(a) 54102 34517 1.567
Case 5(b) 54102 31142 1.74
Page 86

Structcon Designs PVT LTD.: National Highways Authority of India

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structcon Designs PVT LTD.: National Highways Authority of India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT LTD.

Owner NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

CONSTRUCTION OF DWARKA EXPRESSWAY BETWEEN DESIGN CH.

DETAILED DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM FOR 12M TO 13.35M WIDE RCC

Authority's Engineer STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Proof checking consultants Tandon Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Date Rev. Description Note No.

REVISED AS PER PROOF CONSULTANT'S

REVISED AS PER PROOF CONSULTANT'S

21-Mar-22 P0 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL

REVISED AS PER PROOF CONSULTANT'S COMMENTS

1.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM AT EXPANSION JOINT LOCATION 4

2.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM AT P461 31

3.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM AT P462 56

4.0 DESIGN OF PROJECTION BELOW DIAPHRAGM 78

5.0 STABILITY CHECK FOR VOIDED SLAB SUPERSTRUCTURE 81

STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD.

1.0 SUMMARY OF FORCES FOR DESIGN OF END DIAPHRAGM AT P458

The Diaphragm has been designed by following methodologies.

Deep Beam Method as per IS 456:2000

Strut & Tie Method

1.2 DESIGN DATA

Single Span length (P460 to P461)= 27.04 m (Box C/C of pier)

VARIES FROM 12000 TO 13350

Fig 13. Cross Section of End Diaphragm

1.3 SUMMARY OF FORCES

1.3.1 FORCES AT P460

Centrifugal Force = 0.50698

Sr. No. Load Case R9 R2 Fz Mx Load case in MIDAS

4 3-CLASS A -456 1189 733 4113 MVmax3A-Fz2

Impact factor- IRC 6 : 2017- Clause 208

Congestion factor = 1.15 IRC 6 : 2017- Clause 204.4

Reaction Calculation due to Live Load (including Impact Factor)

1.3.2 WIND LOAD

A) With Live Load-

For Pz Calculation Refer Cl.209.2,Note 04,IRC:06-2014

Wind Load Vertical at 36m/s

Wind Load Transverse at 36m/s-

1.7 0.05 1.2 0.15 1.8 0.1

Lever Arm cg of wind load = 2.625 m

Wind Load Application in MIDAS-

B) Without Live Load-

For Pz Calculation Refer Cl.209.2,Note 04,IRC:06-2014

Wind Load Vertical at 47m/s

Wind Load Transverse at 47m/s-

Lever Arm cg of wind load = 2.625 m

Wind Load Application in MIDAS-

Reaction due to Wind Loads-

Sr. No. Load Case R9 R2 Fz Mx Load case in MIDAS

3 Wind Load- Vertical (Without Live Load) 39 59 99 50 WIND VERTICAL-without LL

1.3.3 SEISMIC LOAD

Horizontal Seismic Loads-

Vertical Seismic Loads-

Seismic Coefficient for vertical motions=

Transverse Seismic Force

The Transverse Seismic Force is Applied as UDL in MIDAS File as Follows

(V X Ah )/ Vertical Lever Arm Moment about top

Vertical Upward Seismic Loads-

Horizontal Seismic Loads (Longitudinal)-

Longitudinal Seismic Force

The Longitudinal Seismic Force is Applied as UDL in MIDAS File as Follows

Loads (V X Ah )/ C.G. from Top of Slab Moment about top