Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environment Law
Environment Law
Answers.
Environment: The term environment connotes surroundings. It comes
from the French word Environner which means to surround. Dictionary
meaning is two fold:-
External conditions or surroundings esp those in which people live
work
In ecological sense it is external surroundings in which plants animals
live, and which tends to influence its development and behavious
Ecology: Derived from Greek Oikos and Logos. Oikos refers to “household”
or place to live or habitation. Logos refers to study. Therefore Ecology refers
to study of Eco-system, ie to determine how livings things are organized,
how they interact with each other and with the organic and inorganic
environment; and how the whole system functions. It is the study of
organisms in relation to their environment. (Warming a Danish Botanist in
1895).
TYPES OF ENVIRONMENT:
Natural environment: Environment that comes into existence
without intervention of human agency. It operates through a self
regulating mechanism and hence it is called homeostatic environment
mechanism. Any change in ecosystem due to natural process of
evolution is counter balanced in the other components in the
environment.
Manmade environment: Environment which is modified or created in
accordance with needs of mankind in relation to developmental
activities, use of resources, indulgence, is referred to as manmade
environment or Anthropogenic Environment
CLASSIFICATION OF POLLUTION:
Natural pollution: Pollution caused by natural hazards
Artificial pollution: Caused by intervention of human agency.
Following are different kinds of such pollution.
o Air: Human life depends chiefly upon the air we breath.
Caused by smokes gases released by industrial units and
motor vehicles. Thus air is a mixture of gases, gets polluted by
dust, smoke, toxic gases, chemical vapours noise etc causing
sickness and death. 50% of air pollution is caused by vehicle
pollution. Concerted international cooperation is required to
contain air pollution. The Indian Parliament passed the Air
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981 with a view to
reduce / prevent air pollution. It has adverse effect on climatic
conditions, human health and safety as well as the animal /
biotic well being, and socio-economic conditions. (Page 17). (Its
effects on vegetation animals materials and climate is
enumerated in Page 18, 19).
Objective: The Act aims to achieve the objects which the Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, and Air (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act 1981, failed to achieve. The ministry of forest is entrusted
with the responsibility to implement the provisions of this ACT. The Objects
are iterated below:
Implement UNCHE recommendations
Enact laws on environment protection covering gaps in areas of major
environmental hazards as the existing laws generally focussed on
specific types of pollutants only
Coordinate activities of various regulatory agencies under the existing
laws and creation of an authority / or authorities for protection of
environment.
Provide deterrent punishment to those who endanger environment
safety and health
Salient Features of the ACT Territorial Law applies to whole of India and
has 26 chapters divided into four chapters and has 07 schedules.
It defines Environment, Pollutant, Pollution, Handling, Hazardous
Substances, Occur in relation to factory or premises.
8
period beyond one year, the offender shall face punishment that may
extend to 07 years’ imprisonment. Besides under this act exemplary
damages can also be awarded.
Pollution being a public nuisance and a tort is a civil wrong committed
against the community as a whole. Therefore the guilty must face dire
consequences for causing harm to the entire community and the
environment, consequences which must compensate for restoration of
the environment.
Section 16 deals with offences committed by companies and Section
17 with Govt departments.
Preamble of the ACT: The Act provides for the protection of environment
and for matters related, based on steps recommended in the UN Conference
on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in 1972, also called UNCHE.
___________________________________________________________________________
The roots of the Stockholm Conference lie in a 1968 proposal from Sweden
that the UN hold an international conference to examine environmental
problems and identify those that required international cooperation to solve.
The 1972 conference was attended by delegations from 114 governments. It
was boycotted by Soviet-bloc countries because of the exclusion of the East
Germany, which did not hold a UN seat at that time. Documents created
during the conference influenced international environmental law; one
10
Vienna Conference: The Vienna Convention came into force in 1988 and
was universally ratified by 2009. It is called the Convention for the
protection of the Ozone layer. The purpose of Vienna Convention is to
protect the ozone layer from depletion. The Convention was adopted by the
Conference on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and open for signature at
Vienna from 22 March 1985 to 21 September 1985, and at the United
Nations Headquarters in New York from 22 September 1985 until 21 March
1986. A total of 28 countries originally signed the convention on 22 March
1985. On 16 Sep 94, Vienna Convention along with Montreal Protocol was
universally ratified. It achieved universal ratification (a first for a UN led
initiative) by 2009. The list below mentions the important points related to
Vienna Conventions related to Ozone layer depletion:
7. There are two trust funds associated with the Vienna Convention:
___________________________________________________________________________
MEHT
Ans. Emanating from the Himalayan Ranges, the Ganga flows SE, and
drains itself into the Bay of Bengal. Ganga has been the lifeline for ages in
India. Kanpur as a major city on the banks of River Ganges discharges vast
quantities of waste into the river. Industrial effluents and animal skin for
leather, form the maximum waste discharge into the river, consisting of
organic and harmful inorganic material. These are discharged into the river
without even the basic treatment, which can potentially impact the purity of
the dissolved oxygen and can cause death of aquatic life as also immense
harm to people who consume this water. Mr MC Mehta filed writ petition in
Supreme Court in the case commonly referred to as Ganga Pollution case or
Kanpur Leather Tanneries case. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others
is the first River pollution case to emerge in environmental public interest
legal proceeding. Facts of the case is as follows:
JUDGMENT
In this petition the petitioner requested the court to request the Supreme
Court to restrain the respondents from cathartic effluents into the Ganga
watercourse until the time they incorporate treatment plants for treatment
of hazardous effluents that enter into the water stream.
At the preliminary hearing the Court gave notice under Order I Rule 8 of the
CPC, and highlighted provisions in our constitutional framework that
enshrine the importance of protection of environment.
Article 48-A provides that the State shall endeavour to shield and improve
the atmosphere and to safeguard the forests and wild life.
The Court cited the Water (Prevention and management of Pollution) Act,
1974 (‘the Water Act’), that was passed to manage pollution and maintain
water quality. Section 24 of the Act prohibits disposal of polluting matter
into the stream (as defined in Section 2j). The Act recommends institution of
Central Boards and State Boards.
The Court held the despite the above-stated provisions in the Water
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 Act no effective steps were
taken by the State Board to prevent the discharge of effluents into the river
21
In addition to this, the Supreme Court further relied on Article 52A (g) of
the Constitution which imposes a fundamental duty of protecting and
improving the natural environment. The Court directed that the Central
Government implement at least one hour per week instructions in schools
grade 1 to 10 for lessons on protection and improvement of the natural
environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, prescribing thereof
Text Books after deliberating upon its design development in prudent
manner to develop hygienic practices in early years.
CONCLUSION
The entire case was based on the discharge of ‘trade effluents’ into water
bodies (Ganga river during this case). The case mandated the industries in
India to install primary treatment plants mandatorily and sanitize the
environment and public at large about the importance of curbing discharge
of harmful effluents into the water stream. These steps were mandated
regardless of the inconvenience caused to industries or their financial
constraints, to forestall further degradation of the river water stream and
the associated water bodies, endangering the ecosystem and bio-diversity.
___________________________________________________________________________
Public Trust Doctrine: The Public Trust Doctrine primarily rests on the
principle that certain resources like air, sea, waters and the forests have
such a great importance to the people as a whole that it would be wholly
unjustified to make them a subject of private ownership. Public trust
doctrine serves two purposes: it mandates affirmative state action for
effective management of resources and empowers citizens to question
ineffective management of natural resources. The doctrine enjoins upon
the government to protect the resources for the enjoyment of the general
public rather than to permit their use for private ownership or for
commercial purposes. The State is the 'Trustee' of all natural resources,
which are by nature meant for public use and enjoyment.
Taj Trapezium Case: The Taj Mahal Case, also known as the Taj
Trapezium Case, was fought between M.C. Mehta and the Union of India. He
filed a writ petition in 1986. Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) is a defined area of
10,400 Sq km around the Taj Mahal to protect the monument from
pollution. The Supreme Court of India delivered a ruling on 30 Dec 1996
regarding industries covered under the TTZ, in response to a PIL seeking to
protect the Taj Mahal from environmental pollution. In 1996, the top court
in a landmark judgement (M.C. Mehta vs UOI & Ors), stated that
“the atmospheric pollution in TTZ has to be eliminated at any cost.” It found
that the nearby coke/coal consuming industries were damaging the
monument and the people living in the TTZ. The polluted Yamuna River
that flows behind the Taj and persistent vehicular pollution were also cited
as main causes of pollution responsible for degradation of the iconic Mughal
Monument
Oleum Gas Leak Case: Shriram Food and Fertiliser factory, Delhi,
comprising a population of around 2,00,000 people, produced products like
hard technical oil & glycerin soaps. M.C. Mehta, a social activist lawyer, filed
before the Supreme Court a writ petition seeking an order for closure and
relocation of the Shriram Caustic Chlorine and Sulphuric Acid Plant to a
different area where there will be no danger to people’s health and security.
23
Pending the disposal of the petition, the SC permitted the plant to restart its
work. Then, on 04 Dec 1985, massive leakage of oleum gas occurred from a
subsidiary of Delhi Cloth Mills, one of the plants of Shriram Foods and
Fertiliser Industries, leading to the death of one person and causing injuries
to many others. This case has great significance in environmental advocacy
& in establishing the principle of absolute liability, stating that in the case of
industries (herein referring to ‘Shriram’) engaged in inherently dangerous
activities, the rule of absolute liability will be applied. The essentials of
absolute liability include:
cyclones. Keeping the Coastal Zones safe can improve the lives of coastal
communities.
Rural Litigation and Entitlement: RLEK) is a NGO with its work base
situated in the state of Uttarakhand, India. Its office is located in Dehradun.
It evolved as a result of years of struggle against atrocities meted out to the
underprivileged and marginalized communities in the region. RLEK has
fought in the courts of justice for communities as well as individuals. Some
of the decisions given by the courts in these cases forced the Government to
pass new acts. The Kendra is working persistently in order to bring about a
countrywide exposure to widespread violation of fundamental rights. Its
initiatives have led to Bonded Labour Abolition Act, 1976; Narcotics and
Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act 1988; Environment Protection Act,
1986. The organization works on the aim: "To reach the unreached and
include the excluded." The vision of the organization is to achieve a just
and sustainable society. The Kendra is driven with the mission to empower
indigenous groups, marginalized population, women and children and to
claim their rights and entitlements. RLEK is registered under the Societies
Registration Act, 1860 since 1869 as a Non-Profit Organization.
Policy in Colonial India: The policies from the colonial phase mainly saw
the development of laws that allowed the revenue growth of the British India
government. The motive behind the first-ever environmental law, the Indian
Forests Act of 1865, was to acquire a free source of wood to develop the
railways and other industries. While this law afforded certain protections to
‘reserved forests’, it was mainly in place to legalise huge amounts of tree
felling for the growth of trade and industry; with the produce chiefly being
transported by the railways and ships out of India.
most of these guidelines into law. These included the Water (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act, the Wildlife Protection Act, the Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act, the 42nd Constitutional Amendment to include
Article 48A, and so on. However, some of these laws did not prove to be
effective or manage to prevent the tragedies that followed.
One early morning in December 1984, a poisonous gas leaked from the
Union Carbide India Ltd plant in Bhopal and killed almost 4000 people and
affected lakhs of others. This was followed by another Oleum gas leak in
Delhi at Shriram Foods and Fertilizers. Together, these leaks changed the
discourse on the environmental response in India. These incidents forced
the government to formulate a comprehensive law that regulated and
recognised the interconnectivity of air, water and land together, and the
need for governmental action in terms of setting pollution standards,
environmental clearances for industries and response to industrial
accidents. These laws included the Environment (Protection) Act 1986,
Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act 1984, and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991. Strict liability was replaced with Absolute
liability on the part of industries to implement preventive measures in
relation to release/ discharge of effluents and toxic gases into the open.
Cases like Subash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991) brought a person’s right
to clean water and pure air under the ambit of Article 21 of the Constitution
which guarantees right to life and personal liberty. Further, MC Mehta v.
Union of India (1991) advocated for environmental education in schools to
ensure an informed citizenry, while Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union
of India (1996) developed the precautionary principle and “the polluter pays”
principle.
While there may not be one single policy dealing with all kinds of pollutions
in India, the Indian legal regime now comprises of an extensive set of laws
that set standards for the protection of different aspects of the environment,
standards for industries to follow and response mechanisms in cases of
26
accidents — Albeit that require serious amendments to adapt with time, fit
the current growth rate and to be truly able to protect the environment.
Bio-diversity Act: The Biological Diversity Act, 2002. The act was enacted
in 2002, it aims at the conservation of biological resources, managing its
sustainable use and enabling fair and equitable sharing benefits arising out
of the use and knowledge of biological resources with the local communities.
Biodiversity is all the different kinds of life you'll find in one area—the
variety of animals, plants, fungi, and even microorganisms like bacteria that
make up our natural world. Each of these species and organisms work
together in ecosystems, like an intricate web, to maintain balance and
support life. The Endangered Species Act is the strongest law for protecting
biodiversity passed by any nation. Its purpose is to prevent the extinction of
our most at-risk plants and animals, increase their numbers and effect their
full recovery — and eventually their removal from the endangered list.
(c) Fundamental Rights: Part III Art 12 to Art 35. Article 15 prohibits
discrimination. Article 21 provides for clean environment as life necessity.
Menaka G v UOI 1978 in SC guarantees fundamental right to life – a life of
dignity lived amidst healthy environment, free of dangers of infection /
disease. This right was first recognized in the case of RLEK vs State of UP in
SC year 1988 popularly called as the Dehradun quarrying case. It is the first
case of its kind in India relating to environment and ecological balance.
Illegal mining in Mussouri was the point of contestation, which led to
environmental disorder. The SC treated the letter as writ petition under Art
32 of the Constitution asserting that there is violation of fundamental rights
under Art 21 of the constitution. The Apex court ordered appointment of an
expert committee which recommended closure of many quarrying sites.
(Note: other cases are featured in Pages 216 – 217 of book)
(d) Directive Principles of State Policy: Art 48A makes it prudent for
State to provide good environment to its citizens. Other relevant articles are
Art 39 (deals with equal rights for men women, distribution of ownership,
prevent too much concentration of wealth, protect health of worker, afford
children opportunity to grow in healthy environment), Art 47 (Raising
nutrition levels), Art 48 (Organization of agriculture and animal husbandry),
Art 49 (Protection of monuments)
(e) Fundamental Duties: Art 51A obligates all citizens to strictly adhere
to rules and law of the land. Art 51(g) urges all citizens to be responsible
and protect the environment.
Ans. There is the subject matter of environment law that has evolved over
time which ack the importance of the judiciary to protect the environment.
In fact Common Law has several features that apply to environmental law.
Remedies under Common Law against the environment pollution are
available under the Law of Torts as stated under:
Remedies under law of torts
Remedies under IPC 1860
Remedies under CrPC 1973
Remedies under CPC 1908
29
NEGLIGENCE
30
Tort of negligence is used in environment law when other torts are not
available. An action for negligence may be instituted for injury or damage to
physical discomfort where indiscriminate discharge of effluents is common.
Essentials of negligence are as under:
That the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. Degree of care
expected depends upon gravity of risk and also the nature of the act.
He committed breach of such duty.
Plaintiff suffered damage as a consequence, where such injury was
foreseeable. The damage suffered must be proximate not remote. The
plaintiff has to show that he really suffered damage – proximate
damage.
Absolute Liability: The rule of absolute liability arose out of the rule of
strict liability. It was coined by PN Bhagawati CJI in 1986 for the first time
in the case of MC Mehta vs Shri Ram Foods and Fertilizers Supreme Court
in the case popularly called as the Oleum Gas Leak Case. Absolute liability
provides no defence to the defendant and he has little or no chance to
escape from liability.
Strict Liability = liability irrespective of negligence on the part of the
defendant with certain defences
31
Criminal liability under IPC is different from that provided for under various
special laws relating to environmental protection.
For Specific kinds of pollution cases which constitute offences (Page 114)
PROVISIONS UNDER CPC 1908: Sec 91 provides for action against public
nuisance.
Similarly we have remedies under the EASEMENT act and FACTORIES act
Remedies under MV Act are also relevant. Sec 7 about pollution related
liability even in case of easement, several rules of factories act, Sec 111 of
MV act that empowers the state govt to make rules prohibiting or restricting
use of audible signals at certain times or places. Sec 110 lays down powers
of the CG to make rules like vehicle specs required, benchmarks and
standards to be upheld in terms of quality of accessories fit in vehicles, and
also related to periodical testing inspection of vehicles by prescribed
authorities Sec 111(2d).
32
Q11. How is water pollution prevented under the water pollution act? What
are the provisions regarding offences and penalties in the act?
Ans.
About Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 is a comprehensive
legislation that regulates agencies responsible for checking on water
pollution and the ambit of pollution control boards both at the centre and
states.
The Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 was adopted by the
Indian parliament with the aim of prevention and control of Water Pollution
in India.
Legislative measures: Under CrPC. Section 133 the magisterial court have
been empowered to issue order to remove or abate nuisance caused by noise
pollution Sec 133 empower an executive magistrate to interfere and remove
a public nuisance in the first instance with a conditional order and then
with a permanent one. There are provisions in Factories’ Act too to curb
excessive noise and precautions to be taken in factories.
1960 s, when many laws regarding this were passed by several states of the
USA. The “National Environmental Policy Act” was signed on 01 Jan 1970
by the US President.
In Japan, the “Anti-Pollution Basic Law” covers noise pollution. A National
Council has been established in Japan under the chairmanship of the Prime
Minister. This Council controls the quality of air, water, noise, earth
vibrations caused by construction work and land transport vehicles. It takes
firm steps to check noise pollution.
LEGISLATION IN INDIA:
The original Indian Constitution of 1950 did not have any provision directly
dealing with the environmental pollution. But the Forty-second Amendment
of the Indian Constitution passed in 1976 inserted Article 48-A and Article
51-A to protect and improve the environment. Thus, India became one of the
few countries of the world to enshrine in its Constitution a commitment to
environmental protection and improvement. These amendments introduced
a new dimension in the public responsibility by obligating the Central
Government to protect and improve environment for the good of society as a
whole. Since 1976, it has become a constitutional obligation of the State to
improve and protect the environment. The State is bound to take steps and
impose restrictions on the use of resources which adversely affects the
environment. While shaping the State policy, the government is under an
obligation to ameliorate environmental depredation. To achieve this
objective, the Central government has already passed the Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution) Act in 1974, followed by the Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act in 1981. Similar laws have been passed by many
state governments in connection with water and air pollution.
Some states have enacted statutes related to Noise Pollution e.g., the
Rajasthan Noises Control Act (1963). Bihar Control of the Use of
Loudspeakers Act (1955) and the U.P. Nagar Mahapalika rules 1987. There
exists also the Madhya Pradesh Control of Music and Noises Act (1951).
However, there is no Central Law in India that deals exclusively with the
problems of excessive noise and its control.
Trade of noise:
No person shall use, sell or let on hire the loudspeaker within the limits of
Nagar Mahapalika without prior permission of the licensing officer under
these rules.
Q13. What are the laws protecting Wild Life and Forest in India? Name the
authorities under the wild life act.
Q14. Describe the procedure for declaring a sanctuary under Wild Life
Protection Act.
This Act provides for the protection of the country’s wild animals, birds, and
plant species, in order to ensure environmental and ecological security.
Among other things, the Act lays down restrictions on hunting many animal
species. The Act was last amended in the year 2006. An Amendment bill was
introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2013 and referred to a Standing
Committee, but it was withdrawn in 2015.
Constitutional Provisions for the Wildlife Act
Article 48A of the Constitution of India directs the State to protect and
improve the environment and safeguard wildlife and forests. This article was
added to the Constitution by the 42nd Amendment in 1976.
Article 51A imposes certain fundamental duties for the people of India. One
of them is to protect and improve the natural environment including forests,
lakes, rivers, and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures.
History of wildlife protection legislation in India
The first such law was passed by the British Indian Government in
1887 called the Wild Birds Protection Act, 1887. The law sought to
prohibit the possession and sale of specified wild birds that were
either killed or captured during a breeding session.
A second law was enacted in 1912 called the Wild Birds and Animals
Protection Act. This was amended in 1935 when the Wild Birds and
Animals Protection (Amendment) Act 1935 was passed.
During the British Raj, wildlife protection was not accorded priority. It
was only in 1960 that the issue of protection of wildlife and the
prevention of certain species from becoming extinct came into the fore.
37
The Act provides for the formation of wildlife advisory boards, wildlife
wardens, specifies their powers and duties, etc.
It helped India become a party to the Convention on International
Trade on Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
Its provisions paved the way for the formation of the Central Zoo
Authority. This is the central body responsible for the oversight of
zoos in India. It was established in 1992.
The Act created six schedules which gave varying degrees of
protection to classes of flora and fauna.
Schedule I and Schedule II (Part II) get absolute protection, and
offences under these schedules attract the maximum penalties.
The schedules also include species that may be hunted.
The National Board for Wildlife was constituted as a statutory
organization under the provisions of this Act.
This is an advisory board that offers advice to the central
government on issues of wildlife conservation in India.
It is also the apex body to review and approve all matters related
to wildlife, projects of national parks, sanctuaries, etc.
The chief function of the Board is to promote the conservation
and development of wildlife and forests.
It is chaired by the Prime Minister.
The Act also provided for the establishment of the National Tiger
Conservation Authority.
It is a statutory body of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and
Climate Change with an overall supervisory and coordination
part, performing capacities as given in the Act.
Its mandate is to strengthen tiger conservation in India.
It gives statutory authority to Project Tiger which was
launched in 1973 and has put the endangered tiger on a
guaranteed path of revival by protecting it from extinction.
2. National Parks: “National Parks are the areas that are set by the
government to conserve the natural environment.”
Schedule I Schedule II
This list is for species that are not This schedule contains animals
endangered. that can be hunted.
This includes protected species but the Examples: mice, rat, common
penalty for any violation is less crow, fruit bats, etc.
compared to the first two schedules.
Examples: hyena, Himalayan rat,
porcupine, flying fox, Malabar tree toad,
etc.
Schedule VI
How many Schedules are there in the Wildlife Protection Act 1972?
There are six schedules under the Act.
The central government, if satisfied with the conditions of the specified area,
can declare it as a sanctuary or a national park by the notification. The
central government has the power to declare sanctuaries or national parks if
the government is satisfied by the conditions which are given in Section 35.
Wild Life Wardens and Honorary Wild Life Wardens: The Wild Life
Warden, the Honorary Wild Life Warden and other officers and employees
appointed under this section shall be subordinate to the Chief Wild Life
Warden
Power to Delegate: As per the act, the Director may, with the previous
approval of the Central Government, by order in writing, delegate all or any
of his powers and duties under this Act to any officer subordinate to him
subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the order and Chief
Wild Life Warden can do so with the approval of State Government
23. The Director of Wild Life Preservation who shall be the Member-
Secretary of the National Board
The term of office of the members other than those who are members ex
officio, the manner of filling vacancies referred to in clauses (e), (f) and (v) of
sub-section (1), and the procedure to be followed in the discharge of their
functions by the members of the National Board shall be such, as may be
prescribed.
The members (except members ex officio) shall be entitled to receive such
allowances in respect of expenses incurred in the performance of their
duties as may be prescribe
The aim of the Forest is to preserve the forest ecosystem of India by fulfilling
the following objectives:
1. Protect the forest along with its flora, fauna and other diverse
ecological components while preserving the integrity and territory of
the forests.
2. Arrest the loss of forest biodiversity
3. Prevent forest lands being converted into agricultural, grazing or for
any other commercial purposes and intentions.
1. The Act restricts the state government and other authorities to take
decisions first without permission from the central government.
2. The Forest Conservation Act gives complete authority to the Central
government to carry out the objectives of the act.
3. The Act levies penalties in case of violations of the provisions of FCA.
4. The Forest Conservation Act will have an advisory committee which
will help the Central government with regard to forest conservation.
1. Tea
2. Coffee
3. Spices
4. Rubber
5. Palms
6. Oil-bearing
7. Medicinal plants
Why was Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981 passed?
The effects of climate change caused by all forms of pollution became all too
apparent in the early 1970s. To mitigate their harmful effects it was believed
that nations would need to pass their own laws. Thus during the United
Nations General Assembly on Human Environment held in Stockholm in
June 1972, a resolution was passed which implored the nations of the world
to preserve natural resources such as air.
India itself had issues regarding air pollution due to a wide variety of factors
such as stubble burning, improper industrial practices, environmental
factors etc. To combat these factors a special law was enacted under
the Constitution of India, which was the Air (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act of 1981.
The air act defines ‘air pollution’ as the presence of any dangerous
pollutant that makes the air unbreathable
Section 2 (g) of the Act also set up the Central Pollution Control Board
(CPCB) whose powers extended to the whole of India. To carry out the
directives of the CPCB the act also called for the setting up of the State
Pollution Control Board (SPCB) for the individual states of India
To know what are the Pollution Measurements adopted by the CPCB visit
the linked article
Q 1. What are the key features of the Air (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981?
Ans. The key features of the Act include: