QUESTION 1

a. i. There is a positive correlation between number of sales calls and number of

units sold.
(2 marks)

ii. Independent: number of sales calls (1 mark)

Independent: number of units sold (1 mark)

iii. Correlation coefficient, r = 0.924.

There is a strong positive correlation between number of sales calls and number
of units sold.
(2 marks)

iv. 2 2
R = ( 0.924 ) =0.8538 (2 marks)
85.38% of total variation of number of units sold can be explained by the
regression line using number of sales calls.
(2 marks)

v. a = -1.76, b= 2.139 (2 marks)

Regression equation is y = -1.76 + 2.139x (2 marks)

vi. For an increase of one unit of sales call, the number of units sold will be
increased by 2.139.(approx. 2)
(2 marks)

vii. When x = 26,

y = -1.76 + 2.139(26) (1 mark)
= 53.85 (1 mark)
The predicted value is reliable because 26 is within the range of x (interpolation
estimate).
(2 marks)

b. i. Kolmogrov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test (1 mark)

Graphical method using histogram (1 mark)

ii. Yes, we can indicate that the distribution is normally distributed since the
value
of skewness and kurtosis are between -1 and +1.
(3 marks)

(Total: 25 marks)

1
QUESTION 2

a. i. Point estimate of mean=x=40.7333 (1 mark)

ii. 6.0411 (2 marks)

k=
√15
¿ 1.56 (1 mark)
The company is high than industry average because the
company have a better of quick ratio than industry average
The rate show company of Rezqi sdn bhn 1.56%

iii. 95% confidence interval for mean is

x−t α
2
( √sn )< μ< x+ t ( √sn )
α
2

40.7333−2.145 ( 1.56 ) < μ< 40.7333+ 2.145 ( 1.56 ) (2 marks)

37.39< μ< 44.08 (1 mark)

iv. Since μ=40 is within the range of 95% confidence interval, therefore the mean
weight of the school children does not differ from 40 kg.
(3 marks)

b. i. Mean difference=μ d=9.5−5.875=3.625 (2 marks)

ii. 95% confidence interval for the mean difference is

d −t α s d < μ < d −t α s d
d
2 √n 2 √n

3.625−2.365
( 4.838
√8 ) (
<¿ μd < ¿ 3.625+2.365
4.838
√8 ) (2 marks)

−0.42 < μd < 7.67 (1 mark)

We are 95% confident that the mean difference in the number of crimes before
and after the program is between – 0.42 and 7.67.
We are confident that the mean difference in the number of crime before and
after the program is between there is no significant difference
(2 marks)

iii. H0: There is no significant difference in the number of crimes before and after
the
program has been introduced.
(2 marks)
H1:There is a significant difference in the number of crimes before and after the
program has been introduced.
(2 marks)

iv. Since p-value, 0.072 > 0.05, we do not reject null hypothesis. (2
marks)

There is no sufficient evidence to indicate that there is a significant difference in

the number of crimes before and after the program has been introduced.
(2 marks)

(Total: 25 marks)

2
QUESTION 3

( )
a.
(∑ X )
2 2
Ti
J=SSB=∑ −
ni N

= ( 5
+
5
+
5
+
5
−
20 )
3962 4222 3932 4252 1636 2
(3

marks)

= 170 (1 mark)

b. K = 170 + 1687.2 = 1857.2 (2 marks)

170
L=
3
¿ 56.67
The company perform better than industry average because the company is higher than
industry average
The company show the rate of higher than industry 56.67%
(3 marks)

1687.2
M=
16
¿ 105.45 (3 marks)

56.667
N=
105.45
¿ 0.537 (3 marks)

c. Ho : There is no significant difference in the mean scores of the students among the
four classes.
(2 marks)
H1 : There is a significant difference in the mean scores of the students among the
four classes.
(2 marks)

d. Since p = 0.663 > 0.05, we do not reject Ho (2 marks)

We conclude that there is no significant difference in the mean scores of the students
among the four classes.
(2 marks)

e. Class D has the highest scores and Class C has the lowest scores.

(2 marks)

(Total : 25 marks)
3
QUESTION 4

a. i. 55 ×95
P=
150
¿ 34.83 (2 marks)

40× 95
Q=
150
(2 marks)
¿ 25.33
(1 mark)
R=95−34.83−25.33=34.84

S=55−34.83=20.16 (1 mark)

ii. H0: There is no significant difference in the effectiveness of the medicine.

(2 marks)

H1: There is a significant difference in the effectiveness of the medicine.

(2 marks)

iii. Since p = 0.002 < 0.05, we reject H0.

(2 marks)

We conclude that there is a significant difference in the effectiveness of thee

medicine in curing H1N2
(2 marks)

b. i. U = 20 – 6 = 14 (1.5 marks)

V = 32 – 20 = 12 (1.5 marks)

ii. H0: The grades obtained follow a uniform distribution (2 marks)

H1: The grades obtained do not follow a uniform distribution (2 marks)

iii. Since p-value, 0.04 < 0.05, we reject H0. (2 marks)

4
We conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the grades
obtained follow a uniform distribution.
(2 marks)

(Total : 25 marks)

(TOTAL: 100 MARKS)