Document Number: Risk Review MTSS/Risk Review Study –HSE-RR-2021-08

REVIEW & APPROVAL

Revision A
Date: 28nd Jan 2021
Scribed By: Shahid
Reviewed By: Srinath
Approved By: Poppy Thomas
 Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Facility Description
3. Methodology followed & Assumption
4. Risk Matrix
5. Consequence
6. Probability
7. Risk Level
8. Worksheets
Executive Summary
Facility Information:
Company: MIPS JV
MTSS
Location: ARA Petroleum
Methodology:
Type: Risk Management Review
Facility Description
Facility Description: Water transfer system from Pit to Pipeline.Water from the pit is pumped via dewatering pump to a break tank and the booter pump will pump the liquid
from break tank to the pipeline.
Methodology followed & Assumption
1. The subject study using risk ranking was selected by facilitator in consultation with team members for the subject risk review.

The subject study was conducted at MIPS Office Oman .

All applicable process deviation/other causes where considered to the best of team capability and experience. That also includes operability, facility sitting, human factor &
maintenance hazards. Adequate brain storming using applicable guidewords was ensured for the best possible results. Particular cause missing, if any, should be considered as
exception and out of team capability and experience.

During risk study like Risk Review many operating problems are identified hazards. So such studies can therefore enable companies to use resources more effectively and
become more efficient as well as safer.
The risk review pre-supposes that the design values of flow, pressure, temperature and any other process parameters are adequately designed and operable to start with. The risk
review technique assumes a good level of general management competence, in particular that the plant will be operated and maintained with well trained manpower in the
manner assumed by the design team and in accordance with good management and engineering practices. If this is not true, then finding of such risk study has very little
relevance in terms of contribution towards safer plant/system operation.
Revalidation History
Start Date End Date Comments
Deviations
Deviations
1. No / Low Flow
2. More (High) Flow
3. Reverse Flow/ Misdirected Flow
4. High Pressure
5. Low Pressure
6. High Temperature
7. Low Temperature
8. High Level
9. Low Level
10. Contamination
11. Reaction / Composition / Phase Change
12. Corrosion / Erosion
13. Utility Failure (Power, Glycol, Instrument Air)
14. Maintenance Hazards
15. Abnormal Operations, Spill, Leaks
16. Start-up / Shutdown Hazards
17. Other Concerns (Safety, Human Factors, Process Isolation, Facility Sitting etc)
Risk Matrix

5 B C D E E

4 B C C/D* D E

PROBABILITY

3 A B C D D

2 A B B C D

1 A A B B C

1 2 3 4 5
CONSEQUENCE
Consequence
Code Human Injury/Illness at a Facility
1 Minor Injuries/Illnesses (e.g., First Aid)
2 Medical Treatment, Hospital Admission,
Lost Work Days
3 1 Permanent Incapacitating Injury/Illness a) Cleanup / Remediation Cost - $5MM to
$10MM
4 2 or 3 Permanent Incapacitating
Injuries/Illnesses
5 >3 Permanent Incapacitating
Injuries/Illnesses
Facility Property Damage / Loss of
Environmental Impairment Revenue Impacts Outside a Facility
a) Cleanup / Remediation Cost <$1MM <$1MM a) Nuisance Impacts (e.g., Smoke, Noise,
Odor)
b) Habitat or Wildlife Population - Limited,
Localized, Temporary, and Not Severe b) Minor Injuries, (e.g., First Aid), No Lost
(<$500M) Workdays
c) < $100M
a) Cleanup / Remediation Cost - $1MM to $1MM to $20MM a) Minor Injuries/Illnesses (e.g., First Aid),
$5MM No Lost Work Days
b) Habitat or Wildlife Population - Localized, b) Medical Treatment, Hospital
Short Term with No Lasting Consequences, Admission, Lost Work Days
Slightly Severe, and Partial
Restoration/Mitigation Possible ($500M to c) $100M to $1MM
$2MM)
$20MM to $50MM a) Medical Treatment Requiring
Emergency Room Visit OR Shorter Term
Hospital Admission
b) Habitat or Wildlife Population - Moderate,
Temporary, Moderately Severe, and Partial b) 1 Permanent Incapacitating
Restoration Possible ($2MM to $5MM) Injury/Illness
c) $1MM to $5MM
a) Cleanup / Remediation Cost - $10MM to $50MM to $250MM a) 1 Longer Term Hospital Admission
$50MM
b) 2 or 3 Permanent Incapacitating
b) Habitat or Wildlife Population - Major, Long Injuries/Illnesses
term, Restoration, Mitigation Possible, and
Severe ($5MM to $25MM) c) $5MM to $15MM
a) Cleanup / Remediation Cost >$50MM or Not >$250MM a) 1 Permanent Incapacitating Injury
Possible
b) >3 Permanent Incapacitating
b) Habitat or Wildlife Population - Extensive, Injuries/Illnesses
Substantial, Severe, and Restoration Not
Possible, Permanent Impairment (>$25MM) c) $5MM to $15MM
Probability
Code Critical Mitigation Elements (CME) Scenario Based Analysis Quantitative Analysis
1 > 4 CMEs, failure of 3 would not allow an undesired Event Unwanted event has not occurred in this greater than 1x10-6
Scenario specific type of operation within this industry
using this same technology
2 3 CMEs, failure of 2 would not allow an undesired Event Scenario Unwanted event is unlikely to occur in this Between 1x10-6 and 1x10-4
specific type of operation within this industry
using this same technology during the life of
the operation
3 2 CMEs, failure of 1 would not allow an undesired Event Scenario Unwanted event likely to occur in this Between 1x10-4 and 1x10-3
specific type of operation within this industry
using this same technology during the life of
the operation
4 Single CME to prevent an undesired Event Scenario Unwanted event almost certain to occur in Between 1x10-3 and 1x10-2
this specific type of operation within this
industry using this same technology during
the life of the operation
5 No CMEs to prevent an undesired Event Scenario Unwanted event has occurred in this specific less than 1x10-2
type of operation within this industry using
this same technology
Risk Level
Code Description
A No further action or risk evaluations required. Business Unit shall document identified Hazards, risk evaluations, and Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s)
B Business Unit shall consider feasibility for additional risk evaluations and Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s). Business Unit shall document identified Hazards, risk
evaluations and Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s).
C Business Unit shall consider feasibility for additional risk evaluations and Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s). Business Unit shall verify Risk Level. Business Units
document identified Hazards, risk evaluations and Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s), reasons for actions taken or not taken, and evidence of risk verification.
C/D* Risk level = "D" for Human Injury/Illness or 'C' for other consequence categories.
D Business Unit shall perform appropriate qualitative or, if warranted, quantitative risk analysis to verify the level and identify additional Mitigation measures (KME’s and
CME’s). Business Unit shall develop action plans and target dates for implementation of mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s) considered to be feasible and
determine the target Risk Level. Business Unit shall document identified Hazards, risk evaluations and Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s), reasons for actions
taken or not taken, and evidence of risk verification.
E If the HES Risk cannot be reduced to a lower level within 60 days of identification, Business Unit shall report the HES Risk to HES Risk Management via the HES Risk
Register, including identified Hazards, risk evaluations, Mitigation measures (KME’s and CME’s) and implementation status, reasons for actions taken or not taken, target
Risk Level, and evidence of verification. Business Units shall evaluate the current Risk Level, target Risk Level, previously identified mitigative measures (KME’s and
CME’s) and additional Mitigation opportunities at least annually.
Worksheets

Estimate
CM Initial d
Cause Consequ
Comme Mitigation E
Deviation Causes Locati Consequences ence PEC Risk Recommendations Residual Comments
nts (CME/KME) Na Risk
on Category
me C P RL C P RL
1. No / 1. Low water in PIT . Possible Dewater 1 3 Operator is always 1 3 A Operator shall follow
Low Pump damage available in site standard operating
Flow procedure
2. Low level in Break Possible Booster 1 3 Operator is always 1 3 A Operator shall follow
Tank or Close the Pump damage available in site standard operating
Suction/Valve procedure
Pump will Run at 1 3 Operator is always 1 3 A Operator shall follow
Discharge valve Close Shutoff pressure available in site standard operating
and may damage procedure
the pump.
The discharge
pressure will also Pump discharge
increase to the system is designed
shut off pressure for pump shutoff
of the pump pressure
3. Reverse No significant
Flow/ causes indentified.
Misdirec Refer Section 2
ted Flow
4. High Inadvertent closure
Pressur of manual isolation
e Refer Section 1 and
2
5. Low No significant
Pressur consequence
e
6. High No significant
Temper causes indentified.
ature
7. Low No significant
Temper causes indentified.
ature
 Estimate
CM Initial d
Cause Consequ
Comme Mitigation E
Deviation Causes Locati Consequences ence PEC Risk Recommendations Residual Comments
nts (CME/KME) Na Risk
on Category
me C P RL C P RL
8. High Not applicable in
Level this node.
9. Low Refer Section 1 and
Level 2
10. Conta No significant
minati causes indentified.
on
11. Reacti No significant
on / causes indentified.
Comp
osition
/
Phase
Chang
e
12. Corros No significant
ion / causes indentified.
Erosio
n
13. Utility No significant
Failure causes indentified.
(Powe
r,
Glycol,
Instru
ment
Air)
14. Mainte No significant Maintenance shall be
nance causes indentified. carried out every
Hazar month as per
ds operating procedure
15. Abnor No significant
mal causes indentified.
Operat
ions,
 Estimate
CM Initial d
Cause Consequ
Comme Mitigation E
Deviation Causes Locati Consequences ence PEC Risk Recommendations Residual Comments
nts (CME/KME) Na Risk
on Category
me C P RL C P RL
Spill,
Leaks
16. Start- No significant
up / causes indentified.
Shutd
own
Hazar
ds
17. Other No significant
Conce causes indentified.
rns
(Safet
y,
Huma
n
Factor
s,
Proces
s
Isolati
on,
Facility
Sitting
etc)