Wizards Against Synarchy.

Monday, 16 May 2016 13:31

Any half decent wizard can survive even under the most trying circumstances;
however we do generally flourish better under conditions of religious,
economic and political liberty. I could tell you plenty of horror stories from
colleagues in Islamic theocracies and in the remnants of the Soviet Union,
without of course naming those involved.

Magic attracts those with a penchant for self-reliance and free thought, many
of us in the west have our own businesses for example, and most of us have
our own personal and highly unorthodox moral and social values. Magicians
value individuality and eccentricity above most other things. We do not
accept the consensus view and the received wisdom; we want to experiment
for ourselves, whatever the cost. We appreciate a modicum of freedom.

Over the last few decades a threat has started to grow against many of the
freedoms that we have enjoyed in Europe since the fall of the last crop of
totalitarianisms. I speak of the EUROPEAN UNION, and you may laugh, but
I have looked deeply into this and uncovered the philosophy that underlies
the EU. I have found out where it comes from, and I regret to inform you,
Fratres et Sorrores, that, as with Theosophy & Fascism, the fault lies with
ourselves, yes us occultists and wizards again. It all began with a French
occultist Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1824-1909).

D’Alveydre devised Synarchy.

Many of us in the goldfish bowl of Anglo-Saxon wizardry will probably never

have heard of Saint Yves d’Alvedre, but he remains a seminal figure in French
esoterics. As grandmaster of the Martinist Order he mixed it with Blavatsky,
Theodore Reuss, Eliphas Levi, Papus, and all the rest of them. I strongly
suggest that you source the history and the connections and the ideas,
because this man’s ideas about Synarchy have finally started to happen for
real and we have a potential war situation. If we do not wake up to events
soon, then things may get very nasty.

I will not go into the history here; the web offers plenty of starting references
for that tangled tale. I will however briefly outline what Synarchy means so
that you can see for yourselves the challenge that we face and the probable
consequences of inaction.

Synarchy literally means Joint Rule. D’Alveydre used the term to imply
several things in particular:

1) Synarchy implies Government by an Enlightened Elite. The Elite

themselves of course decide on what Enlightened means, naturally it means
those who agree with them.

2) Synarchy implies the opposite of Anarchy. Whereas in Anarchy the state

should have minimal controls over individuals, in Synarchy the state has
maximal control over every aspect of individual’s lives. Zero freedom in all
spheres.

3) Synarchy comes neither from the Right or the Left; rather it consists of the
Totalitarianism of the Centre.

Already in the post-communist states of Russia and China we see the

adoption of the Non-Democratic Mixed Economy as the preferred model. The
Euro-Synarchists appear to want to follow suit.

D’Alveydre proposed that a secret society of The Elite should take over the
three main instruments of social control, the Political, the Economic, and the
Religious institutions.

He and his followers envisaged taking over first France and then creating a
Federal European Union, and then perhaps One World Government. They
wanted to create a classless but Profoundly Hierarchical state, or mega-state,
run by Elite Technocrats of neither the right nor of the left, but simply The
People Who Know Best, and that this Elite should seek to control every single
aspect of the lives of the populace.

D’Alveydre delved deeply into the crackpot mystical utopianism and

freemasonry of the late nineteenth century and considered that his
inspirations came from The Mystical Adepts of Agartha. So we have another
Black Hat Illuminati sponsored project here I’m afraid, another dystopian
conspiracy to put certain cliques who know what’s best for us into power.

Now French society has always suffered from domination by Elite Cliques.
Ever since the revolution France has led the world in elitism and corruption.
They replaced an elite and corrupt aristocracy with another clique, and just
carried on with added enthusiasm, for now even peasants could in principle
get a foothold on the elevator of the meritocracy of those colluding with the
political class.

D’Alveydre’s ideas failed to really take off for some decades, because two
world wars got in the way and France came under intense American pressure
to become more democratic at the end of each one. Yet Synarchic ideas
continued to spread throughout many of the elite French academies. The
USSR and Russia of course provides an almost perfect example of a Synarchic
state apart from the personality cultism associated with Lenin and Stalin, and
now Putin. (Synarchs usually prefer the faceless anonymity of the technocrat)
During WW2 French Synarchists collaborated with the German occupying
forces in Occupied France and in Vichy France on the principle that they
wanted to preserve their apparatus of state.

However with the advent of the European Union the Synarchist Conspiracy
took its chance and grasped at it with all of its tentacles. It started to cleverly
persuade most of the European Political Class that it had the perfect formula
to perpetuate and aggrandise the Political Class itself, without reference to
the tiresome niceties of democracy.
The Synarchist Eurocrats of the EU have largely circumvented democracy and
now work on putting themselves beyond the reach of law. The real power in
the EU lies not in its elected sham parliament but in the unelected
Commission and in the vast bureaucracy and array of Quangos attached to it.
The Commission provides the perfect home for members of the Political Class
who would either rather not risk submitting themselves to democratic
selection or for those who have failed in that selection. Once a person has
become accepted into the Eurocracy they cannot easily become removed from
it, no proper de-selection processes exist. We cannot vote them out, and they
strive for increasing immunity from prosecution. Once inside, they become
the arbiters of whom else they will admit or exclude. The Synarchists have
almost completed step one of their agenda and taken over the political
apparatus.

The Synarchist Eurocrats have created the most prolific Law-Mill in the
history of the world. The sheer volume of laws and regulations staggers belief
and seems to go beyond all sense and reason until you recognise that it
constitutes step two of the Synarchist agenda in action, take control of the
economy in minute detail. To do this, simply gradually make everything
illegal, pass arbitrary regulations just for the sake of having them, pass
regulations that nobody can comply with properly, and then apply them
selectively.

Do this and you have effectively legalised what medieval monarchs dreamed
of, you have legally given yourself the freedom of Arbitrary Rule.

The Synarchist Eurocrats seem to have upgraded d’Alveyde’s third step of

taking over the Religious powers of their domains because they have ended
up with a huge domain with too many religions in it. Thus they seem to have
decided to create a new religion whose morality and dogma have legal
precedence over all of the religions within that domain. They call this new
religion Social Democracy and we should recognise it as a religion despite
that it never advertises itself as such. Social Democracy permits slight shades
of opinion but no real dissent. (Neither of the left nor of the right,
remember?) You will never enter the Eurocracy if you do not basically agree
with it. Like all religious ideals it remains forever unattainable because of its
inherent paradoxes, socialism remains incompatible with real democratic
freedom. Like all religions it has its own Thought-Speak, in this case mainly
what we identify as Political Correctness. Like most religions it seeks to
restrict the activities of competing religions. In this it has acted with
considerable subtlety. Yes, you can have complete religious freedom, but we
will increasingly take away your freedom to observe or to promote any of the
customs of your religion. You can believe what you like, but you have to
behave exactly as we tell you.

Some wizards and occultists may gloat over such aggressively irreligious
secularism; however, as we have learnt from both fascist and communist
totalitarianisms, your turn for persecution will come eventually as the
Synarchy gets into its stride.

Europe became the cradle of so much of the world’s art, culture, science, and
politics precisely because it has usually existed in a highly divided state.
Various nations have tried many different social and political experiments
and nations have struggled against nations, religiously, politically,
economically, and militarily. The modern world arose almost entirely out of
that crucible of struggle and experiment. Geography accounts for much of
this. Europe contained enough mountains and rivers and forests to make
hegemony difficult and to allow experiments to take place.

Technology (nearly all of it invented in Europe) has now broken down those
barriers and a new form of hegemony now threatens to radically reduce the
diversity of the entire continent.

Welcome to The USE, The United Synarchy of Europe.

Does Synarchisn exist as a hard conspiracy or merely as a pervasive soft

consensus amongst the political class? The answer to this question will
probably tell us whether to expect a Europe that merely becomes
amorphously boring, dull, mildly oppressive, and fairly unproductive for a
while until it breaks up acrimoniously or violently, or whether it will descend
into full-scale Orwellian totalitarianism.

I leave it to the historians and the conspiracy theorists to find out the details
and the philosophical lineages of the guilty. History suggests that it probably
exists in both forms simultaneously at the time of writing. Most of those who
act out of self-interest in the service of the Synarchy have probably never even
heard of it as a formal concept. The status quo just seems to move in that
direction and they move with it because it pays them to do so. However I
cannot believe that Eurocratic Synarchy has evolved entirely by screw-up.
Some element of conspiracy appears necessary to explain the contra-logical
economics, the contra-liberal politics, and the covertly aggressive secularism
of the EU.

We know that d’Alveydre formally enunciated the principles of Synarchy and

we can now see them coming to fruition. We know that d’Alveydre had
enormous influence in French Freemasonry and esoterics and in the French
elite academies. Can we track the intellectual lineages of his followers and
challenge them before they achieve complete hegemony and plunge Europe
into totalitarianism?

If this all seems a little paranoid, then try reading the proposed ‘European
Constitution’.

This astoundingly pompous, ambiguous and incredibly lengthy document

ultimately reduces to a single terrifying sentence that perfectly reveals the
agenda of Synarchy.

“The Government of the EU can take Any and All powers that It deems
necessary.”

Of course nobody in their right mind (outside of the Political Class itself)
would ever sign up to such an agreement presented in such stark terms. Any
proper constitution should both Define and Limit what a government can do.
The EU constitution basically gives the EU government carte blanche. Thus
the actual document dissembles and waffles for hundreds of pages in a
ponderous legalistic attempt to disguise what it actually means. It actually
means quite simply that: -

“The Government of the EU can take Any and All powers that It deems
necessary.”

Perhaps we should look further into the record of the author of this
Synarchist Manifesto, Valery Giscard d’Estaing, ex-President of France. Even
a cursory analysis throws up much that appears disquieting.

As Churchill so astutely observed; “The only thing worse than Democracy is

every other system that we have ever tried.”

Above all we must not follow the examples set by Russia and China or feel
compelled by difficult world economic conditions or fear of social unrest to
allow our freedoms to disappear by stealth.

‘The EU Constitution’ got formally rejected in referendums in France and in

Holland and it would have got rejected by the British, so the Eurocrats simply
retitled it and persuaded the Political Class they they could simply sign it off
as The Lisbon Treaty without any democratic consultation.

Thus we do effectively have a European Union Constitution in place, a vastly

long document that simply reduces to a single horrifying sentence: -

“The Government of the EU can take Any and All powers that It deems
necessary.”

The ‘Remain in the EU’ argument now runs along the line that the EU has
evolved into a terrible mess, but Britain must remain in it and try to reform it
because the alternative of leaving it seems even worse.
This cowardly and defeatist argument does not actually work. Things will
most likely become much worse if Britain remains in.

In refusing to meaningfully renegotiate Britain’s terms of membership the EU

has already flatly stated its refusal to reform, it remains hell bent on forming
a Synarchist Superstate.

Britain can only change the EU by leaving it now. This will hasten its collapse,
other nations will soon follow, and Europe will become liberated from the
EU.

A Europe of free nations will then undoubtedly agree to some modest and
sensible trading arrangements.

If Britain hadn’t joined the EU it certainly wouldn’t try to enter it now.

With the possible exception of the Germans, the great majority of the people
of the EU would not have let the EU project go ahead if they had known of its
real agenda, and they will now vote to get out if they get the chance.

Those who give up their political freedom for economic gain will end up
losing both, as the Greeks, the Irish, the Spanish, and the Portuguese have
already found out, and the French have just begun to realise.

If the grandiose and megalomaniac EU project continues it will become ever

more undemocratic, centralised, bureaucratic, synarchic, inefficient, corrupt,
and oppressive. It serves only the interests of a large section of Big Business
and The Political Class.

The EU Synarchists intend to remove the Political Freedom, the Economic

Freedom, and the Freedom of Thought from everyone else, and to create a
‘Totalitarianism of the Centre’.