BEARING General CAPACITY OF py Group The bearing ¢, ING Capacity of pity groups in Piles in the group eee than the ‘SUM of individual oY Is a term used for & capacities of single piles at the f evaluating the performance of pile ‘StOupS in isa major consideration, Group Capacity in Rock) 7-4 Lp ip ae a o cal ffi GO presse [dees val serv. and must be considered in de the ratio of the capacity of Same depth in the same f compression, Settlement i: 4 pile group to 1 Soil deposit | Oe The group Capacity of piles install led (0 rock is the number of piles tr indi capacity of each ti Number of piles times the individual “Block failure ig @ consider: ti ‘ ation only if foundations are on a sloping rock formation and sliding may occur along unta The Possibility of such an Occurrence must be evaluated from the site geology _2xploration. = ‘Group Capacity ‘in Granular So a Piles driven into cohesionless soil in a group Configuration act a8 individual piles if the | ‘ s Te de 2 Spacing is greater than 7 'times'the average pile diametér. They act as a group at close spacingsCentre-to-Centre spacing of adjacent piles in a group should be at feast two” | times the butt diameter Block failure of a pile group in granular soils is not design consideration provided each inst bearing fallure and the ED lo0s6"Sand "and/or gravel ‘ individual pile has an adequate factor of safety a cohesionless soil is not underlain by a weak deposi ‘ j I deposits, the load carrying capacity of fan indlyidyal pe Baye eat in the group ; ification duri Giving, This increased efficiency should be than single’ because of densification during driving. trated by field experience or in design wit n, and only where demonst eee oe an boring is accompanied invariable by 7 i tests. In case of boré ist in situ concrete piles, . A f bored ca: | some degree of loosening of the soil. In view of this, the group_capacity is-takes \ 2 ce 3d Ck mi Spon “ : 3, 987001. i fa pile wo founded in-dense cohesionless ly ol @yne ultimate capacit SS underlain by Soil oF limited a weak deposit is the smailer of | thicknesI, | LI (1) sum of th i we Stthe single pi, i capacities (2) block failure ~Rier —ailure of a oll mass Punchin, thre bth, 10 throug) st les_and_enciosed © ‘ jes_and | ~8Quivalent in size to tt it. depost_s ing weak * 8°RS6-depositintatno-underlying weak 3 iE be cok tere aie Cd, He ahipraneds Loe. “pair ah le Mat rag ieoe Coss Hoax G Lhfe Seats OT 2 cla! fe a z faa - Pe aay ne Vea toVakeore ARR pee lilir fy, t a atten at | | moa vt yt sb 27 The eslol) WI » “a Cf fect oe i og ae ’ mp Cpe Inset | re.- ~S ze a mal Aare a Foil ; "3 olLEy Lap : Cac Dat a * pis “ ™ YG | ; : , = e ir-eonlack _ eoille Em) 4 @ PL uvcallal ‘ prMeet 4. Pte Bond's : \ eee 3 fe” pollo. col Iurw) Can ate Bw. chishe “7 4 doneerelt- PR ti td gilt de bet BD - "" ov du b jaod O- sthlaned gist fe ab jhe o & “(beth wat { Na, spell lowed sel a a YardEpauph a 7 a “F. (g, he - : ; bet _ Wiheted © Os wae” —* echo} “ . ae wk 27 3 Gur a lg nell © eye he | Se oe Semel Cleese.) Nea fe: 2 sae g29 4 y 4S Sad (1M. dete) “ ar : yor ty ° pte 10? fo.0 lagh fie ba ee Hiowselen " * iV? neces142.72 51.3 kp, >... = 54a gp ee FSH LEB = 6 opp ‘0 — 634 ExI0 = 19,5 ». 0 44 The Ou = +O, 5 - : A, a B, = (tee +6 Klan 6 As) é Z Son ofl a aa ZAGE +, kctand ) at a, = & Nyx A, \ ee Ap= a _ Nohet bp 2m te enilerbule Qe. Thole)yd Mca o ag = Sexg le Pasa) Mx, Set a'9)) we73 Pod) (ses syns 67) / +H 6.9 Kp, (( 21.3 ; Q = (lon 244 Nog)(2. 07S ‘J aged 462.55 ky = C342)¢014).49 = 1244, St kN — | be of NY Pinte gad de 1a 462.53 + 1244. 5% = 969 KN \ y a File Da Ld] Aw. Be, Cp tal Ab N ’ et el Le [lag] _%% 0.66 » 2.16 ; | zo} [[_[ | | eteong S L= lem 1 B= OLbm Sop = | tid oe Cao _ em Tol. os Gadi be " ay 2% = CBYGME) tomy = 25-9mem . OLL x 3639 g S= GB galomnon BG 4, B fed Bagh? on Cs 2 (oan tole xo 0.34 Ce 040.39 Caen “ e. me ‘1 a ° Sp = ()054,2' 2 BE aneer 1 3634 S = Sp+ Sy xe = 25.9 42.34 =, 2B.2ZE am : ——_———s ( & Dilernise seblareL (foe Har melt onelf