Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sugarcane Information System: Project Background
Sugarcane Information System: Project Background
Kamran Rizvi
Sugarcane Information System (SIS) is an initiative by the Sugarcane Development & Sugarcane
Industries Department, Lucknow. It integrates 125 sugar mills and 3 million farmers across
44 districts of Uttar Pradesh (UP). The system manages the procurement of sugarcane from
farmers using innovative technologies such as a website, Interactive Voice Response System
(IVRS), SMS to farmers, hand-held computers, Global Positioning System (GPS) and General
Packet Radio Service (GPRS) systems, etc. These technologies have redefined the sugarcane
procurement process and brought in transparency and accountability into the system. The
system has been functional since September 2010 and has impacted all stakeholders positively.
Project Background
India is a leading producer of sugar in the world and almost half the national production
of sugarcane comes from UP. In UP, sugarcane is grown in 44 districts of the state and
covers an area of 2.3 million hectares.
various state and central government agencies. Ten per cent of total sugar produced
every year is sold through public distribution system at a subsidised rate by the sugar
mills. The remaining 90 per cent is sold in the open market; however, a sugar mill needs
government’s approval before selling sugar in the open market.
Sugarcane Commissioner
Cane commissioner regulates the interaction between sugar mills, society, and the
farmers. He/she is responsible for the promotion and development of sugarcane, its
efficient marketing, and sale and payment for sugarcane to the farmers and sugarcane
growers. He/she has the statutory powers to regulate the sale and purchase of sugarcane
with respect to both the sugar mills as well as the farmers. This is a huge task, especially
when seen in the context that the sugarcane belt in the state is approximately 1,000 km
long and 250 km wide, covering 44 districts.
Farmers
About 3 million farmers are involved in the cultivation of sugarcane, and it is the main
source of their livelihood.
Sugarcane Mills
There are 125 operational sugar mills in the state. These purchase sugarcane worth
1,80,000 million each year, and sugar manufacturing is one of the largest industries in
56 Driving Process Change: Innovative e-Government Practices from India
the state. Sugar mills are heavily regulated industries. From farmers, they procure
harvesting in a radius of 7.5 km. This area is called reserved area, and farmers from
these areas bring their crop to the sugar mills. However, sugar mills can also procure
from areas beyond their reserve areas, known as assigned areas. In assigned areas, sugar
mills establish various purchase centres where farmers sell their produce to the mill’s
procurement clerk. Sugar mills do not make on-the-spot payment to farmers.
Sugarcane Cooperatives
Sugarcane farmers are organised into 168 Sugarcane Growers Cooperative Societies.
UP Cooperative Societies Act (1965) regulates and identifies cooperatives in general
and sugarcane farmer’s societies in particular. Each society has an elected board of
directors that decides all the issues relating to the marketing of sugarcane. The grower
cooperatives represent the farmers in their interactions with the sugar mills. Any farmer
can become a member of his area’s society by paying a lifetime membership fee of ` 212.
The society earns a commission of 3 per cent on total cane procured by a sugar mill from
the society’s members. Societies also provide pesticides, fertilisers, seeds, etc., to their
members on a credit basis.
Sugarcane is a perishable item that loses both its sugar content and weight after
harvesting. This means less money to farmers and lower production of sugar by
factories if supply chain is not efficiently managed. Further, payment for sugarcane
purchased is made some days after supply. Thus, the farmers and the sugar mills have
to be in regular interaction/communication with each other round the year. Each
physical visit/contact of farmer with the sugar mill/society amounts to an interaction.
Table 2 shows the mill-farmer interaction matrix. For a farmer with average land holding
of 1 hectare, the table gives the interaction matrix.
Sugarcane Information System 57
Table 1: Comparison of wheat and sugarcane
There are nearly 150 million transactions between the 3 million sugarcane growers
and the 125 sugar mills. Each interaction is equally important and has a direct bearing
on the income of the farmers as well as the sugar mills.
58 Driving Process Change: Innovative e-Government Practices from India
The Earlier Process
The year-long interactions between mill and the sugarcane farmer starts in mid-April.
These interactions used to be mostly devoid of any technology tools, resulting in
numerous problems for each stakeholder. Following is a description of pre-Sugarcane
Information System (SIS) sugarcane procurement process.
Survey: A village-wise survey was conducted to ascertain expected sugarcane
production for the given year. This activity lasted for 2 months. Each farmer’s expected
production was recorded along with variety. Once planted, sugarcane can be harvested
thrice. The first harvest is called plant and the next two are called ratoon. Each can be
subdivided further into early, general, and late variety. Different varieties have different
sugar recovery rates leading to different sugarcane price. Once the survey was over,
data was compiled for each village and displayed in the village for any objection and
correction. Sugar mills gave preference to ratoon followed by early, general, and late
variety. Since they should procure proportionately from each farmer, they used the data
to create supply calendar for each farmer.
Calendar preparation: Data from the survey was compiled by sugar mill using
software to create a supply pre-calendar for each farmer. Standardised software was
used to create pre-calendar and issue supply tickets. Every sugar mill in the state
used almost similar software for this purpose. Factors such as farmer’s last two years’
supply, mode of transportation, landholding, etc., were taken into account to create a
Table 3: Calendar showing fortnights in rows and days in column. Numbers in a cell
indicate number of supply indent (tickets) expected to be raised on a farmer
Sugarcane Information System 59
pre-calendar showing when a farmer was expected to bring his harvest to the mill. Each
farmer’s calendar showed expected supply indent per fortnight spread over 180 days. In
case of any objections, the pre-calendar could be revised. Final calendar also contained
information about farmer’s debt to the sugarcane society, bank account number, and
mode of transportation.
Start of the sugar mill: Sugar mills usually operate between November and April.
Their operation and closure (including closure due to breakdown) are regulated by
the office of the Cane Commissioner and should be informed to the farmers. A public
announcement using PA systems mounted on a vehicle was used for this purpose.
Sugarcane supply indenting: Sugar mill used supply calendars to issue indent
slips to farmers. Farmers were expected to supply within a specific time period (not
exceeding 3 days). Number of indent slip depends on the farmer’s expected production
and his mode of transportation. To keep track of the farmer’s supply to the mill, farmer’s
societies distribute indent slips and also keep their copies.
Weighment: Farmers brought sugarcane to their assigned purchase centre along with
the indent slip. Without the indent slip, sugarcane could not be bought at the purchase
centre. Purchase clerk at the centre weighed the sugarcane and created a slip mentioning
the quantity and variety of the sugarcane.
Payment: For each supply indent, sugar mills made a direct payment to the farmer
by crediting money into his bank account and intimating the same to respective farmer’s
society. Sugar mills were connected with banks over the net and money was transferred
after deducting the farmers’ due to their society.
Closure of sugar mill: After due approval from the Cane Commissioner, sugar mills
stopped their work. They may operate for 180 days; however, as per the directives of
the government, they may operate for less or more time as well. Any closure of the mill
should be announced over the public address system.
ii. Wasteful expenditure on travel: For each information or clarification, the farmer had
to travel 25–50 km to the sugar mill at least 20 times a year. Each visit cost around
` 200 and would consume the entire day. The cost of these avoidable trips for the
3 million sugarcane growers works out to be ` 5,220 million.
iii. Lower incomes due to smaller supply to sugar mills: The farmers got ` 40 per quintal
more for sugarcane supplied to a sugar mill as compared to the manufacturers of
jaggery. The lack of authentic information about supply schedule, etc., forced the
farmers towards the jaggery units, which in turn, led to lower incomes.
iv. Lower incomes because of smaller area under sugarcane: The cultivation of sugarcane
gives an additional income of ` 6,000 per hectare to the farmer’s, viz., alternative
crops like wheat and rice. Problems involved in supply of sugarcane to sugar mills
were forcing the farmers to alternative crops, which led to lower incomes.
v. Reduced weight due to staleness of sugarcane: After harvest, sugarcane starts losing
both its sugar content as well as its weight. In the absence of reliable instantaneous
communication with sugar mills, the farmers would harvest sugarcane 48–72 hours
before the supply date. Each delay of 24 hours in supply time led to a 4 per cent
reduction in weight of sugarcane, thereby causing financial loss to the farmers. See
Figure 3 for loss of weight of sugarcane with passage of time after harvest.
iii. Unnecessary data entry: About 70 per cent of the sugarcane is purchased at remote
centres located deep in the villages. The manual handwritten weight receipt slips
were transported back to the sugar mills for entry into database. This was costly and
prone to mistakes.
a separate web page by the related sugar mill. The farmers can view all their
transactions on their personal web page and even refer to the log history of the
information passed on to them.
ii. SMS System: Since all farmers had access to mobile telephony, mobile phones
were used for sending SMS as well as attending to query SMSs. All the 3 million
sugarcane farmers have been contacted individually and their mobile numbers were
collected. The SIS sends around 130 million SMSs to all the farmers that cover each
interaction/transaction.
iii. IVRS: IVRS is more suitable for low literacy level farmers since it reads out the
instructions as well as the desired information. Each sugar mill has provided toll-
free telephone lines for ease of access.
Data Acquisition
How do we keep information of 170 million operations in rural areas up-to-date in real
time? Put a hand-held computer at farmer sugar mill interface to record the transaction.
Devices such as hand-held computers and GPS are being used for accuracy in data
acquisition. Being battery operated and rugged, they work well in remote areas. Since
these devices are GPRS-enabled, they can be used to communicate with the central
databank in real time from even remote locations. Presently, 7,000 hand-held computers
and 2,000 GPS devices are being used for data acquisition.
64 Driving Process Change: Innovative e-Government Practices from India
Requirement Gathering
The problem and its solution were discussed with all the stakeholders. The farmer
representatives gave inputs regarding the use of technology most appropriate to the
countryside. The responsibility of implementing the solution rested with the sugar mills.
The system had to be robust, easy to operate, and yet be cost-effective. Each sugar mill had
to be an independent delivery centre. Thus, each sugar mill had to be totally convinced
about the utility of SIS if the project was to be successful on a sustained basis.
The success of SIS shows that IT can penetrate the barriers of illiteracy and the poor
can benefit from it. Use of three parallel systems, viz., websites, SMS, and IVRS to
disseminate information is being done for effective management of sugarcane marketing
chain from the farmers’ fields to the mills. Each of the 125 sugar mills in operation
in the state has been made an independent delivery system for information. Due
to standardisation, the sugar mills have identical websites and 3 million sugarcane
growers have their individual web pages that provide comprehensive information.
The services are of uniformly high standard.
Sugarcane Information System 69
Each interaction of the farmers with the sugar mill is followed up by a confirmatory
SMS. Uniform protocol for IVRS has been designed by which sugar mills provide the
grower information through toll-free lines.
SIS sends information to the farmers via three different media, viz., website, SMS,
and IVRS, to make it capable of catering to the needs of farmers of all literacy levels.
Benefits to farmers
The key benefits to the farmers are transparency, elimination of middlemen, saving in
unnecessary travel, increased supply of sugarcane to the mills, increase in area under
sugarcane crop, and higher weight of sugarcane supply. The financial impact of SIS on
farmers is shown in Table 4.
At the purchase centre, farmers get real-time access to information about weight,
variety, and value of the crop. Any discrepancy in data entry can be brought to thenotice
of purchase clerk and corrected on the spot. Similarly, an SMS is sent to the farmer when
payment advice is sent to the bank.
The software package consisting of websites, software for SMS system, IVRS, and
hand-held computer cost ` 1 million for a sugar mill. For all the 125 sugar mills, the total
cost of implementing the SIS is ` 125 million. The SIS increases the income of sugar mills
and farmers by ` 15,472.6 million. The benefit to cost ratio of SIS is 124 : 1.
Hand-held terminals at the purchase centre also provide the sugar mills with real-
time access to total procurement across various procurement centres. On an average,
each sugar mill procures 40 per cent of the sugarcane at the mill’s gate and the rest
in various outstation purchase centres spread across the reserve and assigned areas.
Sugarcane procured at various outstation centres has to be transported back to the mills.
By providing procurement information, SIS improves planning of pick-up from the
procurement centres by trucks.
Some other benefits of SIS include:
i. The farmers no longer have to travel needlessly to distant offices to fetch
information. All the information is available free of cost to farmers at their
doorstep. The farmers can choose from amongst website, SMS or IVRS to fetch
information.
Sugarcane Information System 75
ii. The sugar mill personnel too have benefitted from SIS. The tedious task of
manual survey and handwritten rewards have been replaced by GPS and
hand-held computer operation. The data is accurate and available in real times.
iii. Importance of IT personnel has been firmly established in the sugar mills. IT
training of weighing clerks, field surveyors, and others has become mandatory
as the new processes are entirely IT driven.
Lessons Learnt
The process of implementation has been an enriching one. The key lessons learnt are:
i. Use of technology appropriate to literacy level: The SIS uses three parallel systems
that cater to the varying IT literacy levels of the users. The farmers at the lowest
end of literacy spectrum use the IVRS whereas the literate and progressive farmers
prefer the website. The SMS benefits all as it can be read with the help of others.
ii. Sustainability: The SIS addresses the financial, social, regulatory, and environmental
sustainability of the project. All stakeholders benefit substantially from the initiative
and this ensures its sustainability.
iii. Decentralised implementation: Each of the 125 sugar mills were made an
independent delivery centre. The sugar mills and sugarcane growers were within
close vicinity of each other and the implementation was easy.
iv. Decentralised monitoring: The 168 cooperative growers’ societies were given the
task of monitoring the implementation. The service provider and the end users were
in constant touch leading to perfect execution.
v. Agreed goals—stakeholder consultation: The system was designed after incorporating
the suggestions of both the farmers as well as the sugar mills. The agreed goals
facilitated the implementation in a smooth manner.
76 Driving Process Change: Innovative e-Government Practices from India
vi. Training: IT personnel of the sugar mills were trained to understand the design
standards. The time spent on training led to perfect communication of the Cane
Commissioner’s vision with the IT personnel. This ensured that implementation of
SIS was quick and upto the design standards. Similarly, the farmers were trained in
the use SIS by the 168 growers’ societies.
vii. Regular monitoring: Each sugar mill was personally monitored by the Sugarcane
Commissioner’s team. Monthly review meetings were followed up by monitoring
of implementation until the desired standards were achieved.
Long-Term Significance
i. Low literacy rates no barrier to e-Governance: The successful implementation of
SIS in a state with low literacy rate is a remarkable achievement that highlights the
fact that an innovative IT solution can penetrate barriers of low literacy and deliver
results to the last person. The simultaneous operation of three media provides access
to all beneficiaries taking into account the varying IT literacy levels of the individual
users.
.ii. Sustainability: The SIS had no budgetary support from the government and cost is
borne by the sugar mills. The sugarcane farmers, the growers’ cooperatives, and the
sugar mills are all receiving considerable financial benefits from SIS while helping
government perform its role as a facilitator. All these factors ensure the financial,
social, and regulatory sustainability of the initiative.
iii. Penetration of IT in rural areas: The availability of information through SIS has led
to the increase in use of computers in rural areas. The confidence gained by the
farmers by the use of ICT tools is revolutionary and is an invaluable asset.
iv. Reduction in layers of government and middlemen: The implementation of SIS has
brought complete transparency to all transactions. This has resulted in the elimination
of middlemen and has cut down the role of middle-level officials, thereby simplifying
the system and getting rid of corruption.
v. Replicability: The lessons learnt can be replicated in the following areas:
The SIS can be used by all organisations and government departments that interact
with a large number of people spread over a wide geographical area. The areas where
SIS can have a relevance are: (1) Social Welfare Department – inform beneficiaries
about release of scholarships and social security pensions; (2) Primary Education
Department – verify attendance of teachers; (3) Land records – inform the owners
about any change in ownership; and (4) Rural Development – inform citizens about
release of funds for local village bodies.
Sugarcane Information System 77
Future Roadmap
While extending the use of SIS services for sugarcane department, new features are being
added to the system. Live feed from CCTV cameras installed in sugar mills at weighment
centres is being provided through websites, so that farmers can know the proper time to
carry their produce to the mills. A web-driven complaint redressal mechanism has been
established in which farmers can register their complaints through SMS or websites and
the mills are responsible for solving the problem in a given time frame. The farmers are
informed through SMSs about the redressal of their complaints. A plan for establishing
touch-screen kiosks at village level is under progress and it is planned to use the system
for marketing of other crops, especially those of perishable nature such as horticultural
crops.