NAMES - LINDA NDLOVU R203254F

MARGRET MASUNDANO R187152Z

AMY KANKUNI R203268Y

THENJIWE MOYO R203379D

RUMBIDZAI DANGIRWA R203261C

DEGREE PROGRAMME- HFPC 2.2

COURSE CODE- HCDP208

COURSE MODULATOR- DR KOKERA

DUE DATE- 24 JUNE 2022

UNIANOVA attitude BY intensity length
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=length(BONFERRONI)
/PLOT=PROFILE(intensity*length length*intensity)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(length)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(intensity)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
/PRINT=ETASQ HOMOGENEITY DESCRIPTIVE
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=intensity length intensity*length.

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N

intensity 1 Low 300

2 high 300
length 0 control 200

1 3 month
200
intervention

2 6 months
200
intervention

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: attitude

intensity length Mean Std. Deviation N

Low control 7.539779933824 1.111816964150

100
035 358

3 month intervention 7.995710692799 .7305879053383

100
444 70

6 months intervention 8.293881582566 .7050845298627

100
984 83

Total 7.943124069730 .9203845573196

300
156 06
high control 7.660872578657 .8145955207080 100
628 67
 3 month intervention 9.939507003552 .7249200096510
100
098 77
6 months intervention 11.94937799309 .4419650086348
100
3963 39
Total 9.849919191767 1.880923613311
300
894 478
Total control 7.600326256240 .9740444383817
200
834 10

3 month intervention 8.967608848175 1.215032948162

200
768 325

6 months intervention 10.12162978783 1.924045086414

200
0470 521

Total 8.896521630749 1.760487096799

600
023 779

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

Dependent Variable: attitude

F df1 df2 Sig.

16.785 5 594 .000

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of

the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + intensity + length + intensity
* length

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: attitude

Type III Sum of Partial Eta

Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared

Corrected Model 1494.996a 5 298.999 491.311 .000 .805

Intercept 47488.858 1 47488.858 78032.924 .000 .992
intensity 545.380 1 545.380 896.160 .000 .601
length 637.213 2 318.607 523.529 .000 .638
intensity * length 312.403 2 156.201 256.668 .000 .464
Error 361.493 594 .609
Total 49345.348 600
Corrected Total 1856.490 599
a. R Squared = .805 (Adjusted R Squared = .804)

Estimated Marginal Means

1. length
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

length Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

control 7.600 .055 7.492 7.709

3 month intervention 8.968 .055 8.859 9.076
6 months intervention 10.122 .055 10.013 10.230

2. intensity
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

intensity Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Low 7.943 .045 7.855 8.032

high 9.850 .045 9.761 9.938

3. Grand Mean
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

8.897 .032 8.834 8.959

Post Hoc Tests

length
 Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: attitude
Bonferroni

Mean Difference (I- 95% Confidence Interval

(I) length (J) length J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

control 3 month - - -
.07801119358847
interventio 1.36728259193493 .000 1.55457032192626 1.17999486194360
2
n 4 *
2 6

6 months - - -
.07801119358847
interventio 2.52130353158963 .000 2.70859126158096 2.33401580159830
2
n 6* 4 8
3 month control 1.36728259193493 .07801119358847 1.17999486194360 1.55457032192626
.000
interventio 4 *
2 6 2
n 6 months - -
.07801119358847 -.96673320966337
interventio 1.15402093965470 .000 1.34130866964603
2 4
n 2* 0
6 months control 2.52130353158963 .07801119358847 2.33401580159830 2.70859126158096
.000
interventio 6 *
2 8 4
n 3 month
1.15402093965470 .07801119358847 1.34130866964603
interventio .000 .966733209663374
2 *
2 0
n

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .609.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

Profile Plots
GRAPH
/HISTOGRAM(NORMAL)=attitude
/PANEL COLVAR=intensity COLOP=CROSS ROWVAR=length ROWOP=CROSS.

Graph
UNIANOVA attitude BY intensity length
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=length(TUKEY)
/PLOT=PROFILE(intensity*length length*intensity)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(length)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(intensity)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
/PRINT=ETASQ HOMOGENEITY DESCRIPTIVE
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=intensity length intensity*length.

Univariate Analysis of Variance

 Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N

intensity 1 Low 300

2 high 300
length 0 control 200

1 3 month
200
intervention

2 6 months
200
intervention

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: attitude

intensity length Mean Std. Deviation N

Low control 7.539779933824 1.111816964150

100
035 358

3 month intervention 7.995710692799 .7305879053383

100
444 70

6 months intervention 8.293881582566 .7050845298627

100
984 83

Total 7.943124069730 .9203845573196

300
156 06
high control 7.660872578657 .8145955207080
100
628 67
3 month intervention 9.939507003552 .7249200096510
100
098 77
6 months intervention 11.94937799309 .4419650086348
100
3963 39
Total 9.849919191767 1.880923613311
300
894 478
Total control 7.600326256240 .9740444383817
200
834 10

3 month intervention 8.967608848175 1.215032948162

200
768 325

6 months intervention 10.12162978783 1.924045086414

200
0470 521

Total 8.896521630749 1.760487096799

600
023 779
 Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
Dependent Variable: attitude

F df1 df2 Sig.

16.785 5 594 .000

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of

the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + intensity + length + intensity
* length

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: attitude

Type III Sum of Partial Eta

Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared

Corrected Model 1494.996a 5 298.999 491.311 .000 .805

Intercept 47488.858 1 47488.858 78032.924 .000 .992
intensity 545.380 1 545.380 896.160 .000 .601
length 637.213 2 318.607 523.529 .000 .638
intensity * length 312.403 2 156.201 256.668 .000 .464
Error 361.493 594 .609
Total 49345.348 600
Corrected Total 1856.490 599

a. R Squared = .805 (Adjusted R Squared = .804)

Estimated Marginal Means

1. length
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

length Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

control 7.600 .055 7.492 7.709

3 month intervention 8.968 .055 8.859 9.076
6 months intervention 10.122 .055 10.013 10.230
 2. intensity
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

intensity Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Low 7.943 .045 7.855 8.032

high 9.850 .045 9.761 9.938

3. Grand Mean
Dependent Variable: attitude
95% Confidence Interval

Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

8.897 .032 8.834 8.959

Post Hoc Tests

length

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: attitude
Tukey HSD

Mean Difference (I- 95% Confidence Interval

(I) length (J) length J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

control 3 month - - -
.07801119358847
interventio 1.36728259193493 .000 1.55057771230572 1.18398747156414
2
n 4* 5 4

6 months - - -
.07801119358847
interventio 2.52130353158963 .000 2.70459865196042 2.33800841121884
2
n 6*
6 6
3 month control 1.36728259193493 .07801119358847 .000 1.18398747156414 1.55057771230572
interventio 4* 2 4 5
n 6 months - -
.07801119358847 -.97072581928391
interventio 1.15402093965470 .000 1.33731606002549
2 1
n 2* 2
6 months control 2.52130353158963 .07801119358847 2.33800841121884 2.70459865196042
.000
interventio 6*
2 6 6
n 3 month
1.15402093965470 .07801119358847 1.33731606002549
interventio .000 .970725819283911
2*
2 2
n

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .609.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets

attitude
Tukey HSD a,b

Subset

length N 1 2 3

control 7.600326256240
200
834
3 month intervention 8.967608848175
200
768
6 months intervention 10.12162978783
200
0470
Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .609.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 200.000.
b. Alpha = .05.

Profile Plots
UNIANOVA attitude BY intensity length
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=length(TUKEY)
/PLOT=PROFILE(intensity*length length*intensity)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(length)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(intensity)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(intensity*length)
/PRINT=DESCRIPTIVE
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=intensity length intensity*length.

Univariate Analysis of Variance

 Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N

intensity 1 Low 300

2 high 300
length 0 control 200

1 3 month
200
intervention

2 6 months
200
intervention

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: attitude

intensity length Mean Std. Deviation N

Low control 7.539779933824 1.111816964150

100
035 358

3 month intervention 7.995710692799 .7305879053383

100
444 70

6 months intervention 8.293881582566 .7050845298627

100
984 83

Total 7.943124069730 .9203845573196

300
156 06
high control 7.660872578657 .8145955207080
100
628 67
3 month intervention 9.939507003552 .7249200096510
100
098 77
6 months intervention 11.94937799309 .4419650086348
100
3963 39
Total 9.849919191767 1.880923613311
300
894 478
Total control 7.600326256240 .9740444383817
200
834 10

3 month intervention 8.967608848175 1.215032948162

200
768 325

6 months intervention 10.12162978783 1.924045086414 200

0470 521
 Total 8.896521630749 1.760487096799
600
023 779

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: attitude

Type III Sum of

Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Corrected Model 1494.996a 5 298.999 491.311 .000

Intercept 47488.858 1 47488.858 78032.924 .000
intensity 545.380 1 545.380 896.160 .000
length 637.213 2 318.607 523.529 .000
intensity * length 312.403 2 156.201 256.668 .000
Error 361.493 594 .609
Total 49345.348 600
Corrected Total 1856.490 599

a. R Squared = .805 (Adjusted R Squared = .804)

Estimated Marginal Means

1. length
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

length Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

control 7.600 .055 7.492 7.709

3 month intervention 8.968 .055 8.859 9.076
6 months intervention 10.122 .055 10.013 10.230

2. intensity
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

intensity Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Low 7.943 .045 7.855 8.032

high 9.850 .045 9.761 9.938
 3. Grand Mean
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

8.897 .032 8.834 8.959

4. intensity * length
Dependent Variable: attitude

95% Confidence Interval

intensity length Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Low control 7.540 .078 7.387 7.693

3 month intervention 7.996 .078 7.842 8.149

6 months intervention 8.294 .078 8.141 8.447

high control 7.661 .078 7.508 7.814

3 month intervention 9.940 .078 9.786 10.093

6 months intervention 11.949 .078 11.796 12.103

Post Hoc Tests

length

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: attitude
Tukey HSD

Mean Difference (I- 95% Confidence Interval

(I) length (J) length J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

control 3 month - .07801119358847 .000 - -

interventio 1.36728259193493 2 1.55057771230572 1.18398747156414
n 4*
5 4
 6 months - - -
.07801119358847
interventio 2.52130353158963 .000 2.70459865196042 2.33800841121884
2
n 6*
6 6
3 month control 1.36728259193493 .07801119358847 1.18398747156414 1.55057771230572
.000
interventio 4*
2 4 5
n 6 months - -
.07801119358847 -.97072581928391
interventio 1.15402093965470 .000 1.33731606002549
2 1
n 2* 2
6 months control 2.52130353158963 .07801119358847 2.33800841121884 2.70459865196042
.000
interventio 6*
2 6 6
n 3 month
1.15402093965470 .07801119358847 1.33731606002549
interventio .000 .970725819283911
2*
2 2
n

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .609.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets

attitude
Tukey HSD a,b

Subset

length N 1 2 3

control 7.600326256240
200
834
3 month intervention 8.967608848175
200
768
6 months intervention 10.12162978783
200
0470
Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .609.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 200.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
Profile Plots
DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=length attitude
/STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV VARIANCE RANGE MIN MAX SEMEAN KURTOSIS SKEWNESS.

Descriptive Statistics

Std. Vari Skewne

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation ance ss Kurtosis

St St
d. d.
Er Er
Stat Stati Stat ro Stat ro
istic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic stic istic r istic r
lengt -
.00 .1 .1
h 600 2 0 2 1.00 .033 .817 .668 1.5
0 00 99
03
attitu 7.6947502 5.2288298 12.923580 8.8965216 .07187158 1.7604870 3.09 .56 .1 -.58 .1
600
de 0440809 1557021 01997830 30749023 4765220 96799778 9 0 00 4 99
Valid
N
(list 600
wise
)

a)Independent variable- teenagers’ attitude

Dependent variable- intervention

b) Null hypothesis (H0) - there is no significant effect on teenagers’ attitude towards living with
HIV

Alternative hypothesis (H1) - there is a significant effect on teenagers’ attitude towards living
with HIV

c)

d) The histogram shows low intensity on the distribution and the length shows high distribution

e)

f) A post-hoc test showed that each pair of means differs significantly, and this is because the
interventions varied according to the time period

g)

h) The disadvantage of using the Factorial ANOVA is that it is difficult to experiment with more
than two factors or levels. This is as a result of the fact, if there is an error in of the levels, it will
automatically affect the whole test.