INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for PROFICIENT TEACHERS (Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special

Science Teacher I-II)

Name of Employee MARLYTTE V. PLAZA Name of Rater ROWENA O. ANGWAS

Position TEACHER III Position PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Division AGUSAN DEL SUR Date of Review JULY 27, 2022
School KAPATUNGAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Rating Period AUGUST 2021-JULY 2022

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators

KRAs/ Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating

MFOs Domains Objectives Timeline Weight QET 5 4 3 2 1 Actual Results Q E T Ave. Score
Content 1. Applied knowledge SY 5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Knowledge of content within and across 2021- Objective 1 as shown in Objective 1 as shown in Objective 1 as shown in Objective 1 as shown in Objective 1 as shown in
and curriculum teaching areas 2022 COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
Pedagogy observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 7 5 5 0.25
or No acceptable evidence
was shown

Content 2. Used research-based SY 5% Quality Used Used research based Used Use of No acceptable evidence
Knowledge knowledge and principles of 2021- research_x0002_based knowledge and/or research_x0002_based research_x0002_based was shown
and teaching and learning to 2022 knowledge and/or principles of teaching and knowledge and/or knowledge and/or principle
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Pedagogy enhance professional practice principles of teaching and learning in two principles of teaching and of teaching and learning is
learning in all the components of instruction learning in one component identified but was poorly 7 5 5 0.25
components of instruction in the lesson plan to of instruction in the lesson used as basis for
in the lesson plan to improve student learning plan to improve student planning / designing the
improve student learning learning lesson
Content 3. Displayed proficient use of SY 5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Knowledge Mother Tongue, Filipino and 2021- Objective 3 as shown in Objective 3 as shown in Objective 3 as shown in Objective 3 as shown in Objective 3 as shown in
and English to facilitate teaching 2022 COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
Pedagogy and learning observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 7 5 5 0.25
or No acceptable evidence
was shown

Content 4. Used effective verbal and SY 5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Knowledge non-verbal classroom 2021- Objective 4 as shown in Objective 4 as shown in Objective 4 as shown in Objective 4 as shown in Objective 4 as shown in
and communication strategies to 2022 COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
Pedagogy support learner observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 7 5 5 0.25
understanding, participation, or No acceptable evidence
engagement and achievement was shown
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Learning 5. Established safe and SY
Environme secure learning environments 2021-
nt to enhance learning through 2022
the consistent implementation
of policies, guidelines and
procedures
5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in Objective 5 as shown in
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets /inter-
observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement
forms or No acceptable 6 4 4 0.2
evidence was shown
 Performance Indicators

KRAs/ Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating

MFOs Domains Objectives Timeline Weight QET 5 4 3 2 1 Actual Results Q E T Ave. Score
Learning 6. Maintained learning SY 5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Environme environments that promote 2021- Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown in Objective 6 as shown in
nt fairness, respect and care to 2022 COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
encourage learning observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 7 5 5 0.25
or No acceptable evidence
was shown
Learning 7. Maintained learning SY 5% Quality Provided effective and Provided effective learning Provided an effective Provided learning No acceptable evidence
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Environme environments that nurture and 2021- (Set A) varying learning opportunities that are learning opportunity that is opportunity/ies that is/are was shown
nt inspire learners to participate, 2022 opportunities that are well_x0002_aligned with well-aligned with the partially aligned with the
cooperate and collaborate in well_x0002_aligned with the learning goals and learning goal/s and learning goal/s and only
continued learning the learning goals and engage learners to engage learners to somehow engage/s
feature all elements of participate, cooperate, participate, cooperate, learners to participate,
collaborative learning as and/or collaborate in and/or collaborate in cooperate, and/or
shown in the submitted continued learning as continued learning as collaborate in continued
learning material shown in the submitted shown in the submitted learning as shown in the
learning material learning material submitted learning material

Learning 8. Applied a range of
Environme successful strategies that
nt maintain learning
environments that motivate
learners to work productively
by assuming responsibility for
their own learning
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES
Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
(Set B) Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown in Objective 7 as shown in
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement 7 5 5 0.25
forms or No acceptable
evidence was shown
SY 5% Quality Applied effective teaching Applied effective teaching Applied an effective Applied teaching No acceptable evidence
2021- (Set A) strategies that are strategies that are teaching strategy that is strategy/ies that is/are was shown
2022 well_x0002_aligned with well_x0002_aligned with well-aligned with the partially aligned with the
the learning goals and the learning goals and learning goal/s and learning goal/s and only
successfully motivate successfully motivate successfully motivates somehow motivate/s
learners to monitor and learners to work learners to work learners to work
evaluate their own learning productively by assuming productively by assuming productively by assuming
as shown in the submitted responsibility for their own responsibility for their own responsibility for their own
learning material learning as shown in the learning as shown in the learning as shown in the
submitted learning material submitted learning material submitted learning material

Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
(Set B) Objective 8 as shown in Objective 8 as shown in Objective 8 as shown in Objective 8 as shown in Objective 8 as shown in
COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
observer agreement inter-observer agreement observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 7 5 5 0.25
forms forms or No acceptable evidence
was shown

Diversity of 9. Designed, adapted and SY 5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Learners, implemented teaching 2021- (Set A) Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in Objective 9 as shown in
Curriculum strategies that are responsive 2022 COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets /inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets /inter-
and to learners with disabilities, observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 7 5 5 0.25
Planning giftedness and talents or No acceptable
and evidence was shown
Assessmen
t and Quality Demonstrated Level 5 as Demonstrated Level 4 as Demonstrated Level 3 as Demonstrated Level 2 as Demonstrated Level 1 as
Reporting
(Set B) shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs or No
acceptable evidence was 0
shown
 Diversity of 10. Adapted and used SY 5% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Learners, culturally appropriate teaching 2021- (Set A) Objective 10 as shown in Objective 10 as shown in Objective 10 as shown in Objective 10 as shown in Objective 10 as shown in
Curriculum strategies to address the 2022 COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets /inter- COT rating sheets / inter- COT rating sheets / inter-
and needs of learners from observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement observer agreement forms observer agreement forms 6 4.5 4.5 0.225
Planning indigenous groups forms or No acceptable evidence
and was shown
Assessmen
t and Quality Demonstrated Level 5 as Demonstrated Level 4 as Demonstrated Level 3 as Demonstrated Level 2 as Demonstrated Level 1 as
Reporting (Set B) shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs shown in the TRFs or No
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

acceptable evidence was 0

11. Adapted and implemented SY
learning programs that ensure 2021-
relevance and responsiveness 2022
to the needs of all learners
shown
5% Quality Evaluated the adapted / Monitored progress of the Completed the Planned for the No acceptable evidence
contextualized learning adapted / contextualized implementation of the implementation of the was shown
program as evidenced by learning program while adapted / contextualized adapted / contextualized
MOV No. 1 being implemented as learning program as existing learning program 7 5 5 0.25
evidenced by MOV No. 2 evidenced by MOV No. 3 as evidenced by MOV No.
4

Diversity of 12. Utilized assessment data SY 5% Quality Implemented a teaching Developed materials Planned for a teaching and Analyzed learners’ No acceptable evidence
Learners, to inform the modification of 2021- and learning strategy / based on learners’ learning strategy and/or mastered skills based on was shown
Curriculum teaching and learning 2022 program using materials assessment data as program based on the frequency of errors and
and practices and programs based on learners’ evidenced by a list of learners’ assessment data correct responses as
Planning assessment data as identified least / most as evidenced by a list of evidenced by a list of
and evidenced by a list of mastered skills with identified least / most identified least / most 7 5 5 0.25
Assessmen identified least / most supporting MOV No. 2 mastered skills with mastered skills
t and mastered skills with supporting MOV No. 3
Reporting supporting MOV No. 1

Community 13. Maintained learning SY 5% Quality Collaborated with the Planned with the Conducted a consultative Communicated with the No acceptable evidence
Linkages environments that are 2021- community stakeholder in community stakeholders a meeting with the community stakeholders was shown
and responsive to community 2022 the implementation / program, project, and/or community stakeholders about a program, project,
Profession contexts completion of a program, activity that maintains a on a program, project, and/or activity that
al project, and/or activity that learning environment and/or activity that maintains the learning
Engageme maintains a learning responsive to community maintains a learning environment responsive to
nt and environment responsive to contexts as evidenced by environment responsive to community contexts as
Personal community contexts as MOV No. 2 community contexts as evidenced by MOV No. 4
6 4 4 0.2
Growth and evidenced by MOV No. 1 evidenced by MOV No. 3
Profession
al
Developme
nt
 Performance Indicators
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating
KRAs/
MFOs Domains Objectives Timeline Weight QET 5 4 3 2 1 Actual Results Q E T Ave. Score
Community 14. Reviewed regularly SY 5% Quality Exhibited an improved Exhibited an improved Reviewed personal Participated in the review No acceptable evidence
Linkages personal teaching practice 2021- practice through one’s practice through a teaching teaching practices using of personal teaching was shown
and using existing laws and 2022 teaching as impact of material as impact of laws and regulations that practices using laws and
Profession regulations that apply to the regularly reviewing one’s regularly reviewing one’s apply to the profession and regulations that apply to
al teaching profession and the teaching practice/s using teaching practice/s using the responsibilities in the the profession and the
Engageme responsibilities specified in the laws and regulations that laws and regulations that Code of Ethics for responsibilities in the Code
nt and Code of Ethics for apply to the profession and apply to the profession and Professional Teachers in 4 of Ethics for Professional
Personal Professional Teachers 1. the responsibilities in the the responsibilities in the quarters with reflection Teachers in 4 quarters as
Growth and Annotated video / audio Code of Ethics for Code of Ethics for outputs as evidenced by evidenced by MOV No. 4
Profession recording of one’s teaching Professional Teachers as Professional Teachers as MOV No. 3
al that shows impact of regularly evidenced by MOV No. 1 evidenced by MOV No. 2 6 4 4 0.2
Developme reviewing one’s teaching
nt practice/s 2. Annotated
teaching material that shows
impact of regularly reviewing
one’s teaching practice/s ●
lesson plan ● activity sheet ●
assessment materials ●
others (please specify)
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

15. Complied with and
implemented school policies
and procedures consistently
to foster harmonious
relationships with learners,
parents, and other
stakeholders
SY 5% Quality Sustained engagement
2021- with the learners, parents /
2022 guardians, and other
stakeholders regarding
school policies and
procedures through
school_x0002_community
partnership/s as evidenced
by MOV no. 1
Discussed with learners, Communicated with Implemented school No acceptable evidence
parents / guardians, and learners, parents / policies and procedures was shown
other stakeholders the guardians, and other without communicating
implemented school stakeholders the and consulting the
policies and procedures as implemented school learners, parents /
evidenced by MOV no. 2 policies and procedures as guardians, and other
6 4 4 0.2
evidenced by MOV no. 3 stakeholders

16. Applied a personal SY
philosophy of teaching that is 2021-
learner-centered 2022
17. Adopted practices that SY
uphold the dignity of teaching 2021-
as a profession by exhibiting 2022
qualities such as caring
attitude, respect and integrity
5% Quality Applied
learner_x0002_centered
teaching philosophy in the
lesson plan in all the
components of instruction
in the lesson plan to
improve student learning
5% Quality Exhibited dignity of
teaching as a profession
by exhibiting qualities such
as caring attitude, respect,
and integrity with
affirmation from different
school stakeholders as
evidenced by at least two
MOV No. 1
Applied Applied Application of learner- No acceptable evidence
learner_x0002_centered learner_x0002_centered centered teaching was shown
teaching philosophy in the teaching philosophy in the philosophy is reflected but
lesson plan in two lesson plan in one was poorly used as basis 7 5 5 0.25
components of instruction component of instruction in for planning / designing the
in the lesson plan to the lesson plan to improve lesson.
improve student learning student learning
Exhibited dignity of Adopted practices that Adopted a practice that No acceptable evidence
teaching as a profession uphold the dignity of uphold the dignity of was shown
by exhibiting qualities such teaching as a profession teaching as a profession
as caring attitude, respect, by exhibiting qualities such by exhibiting qualities such
and integrity with as caring attitude, respect, as caring attitude, respect,
affirmation from any school and integrity as evidenced and integrity as evidenced 4 4 4 0.2
stakeholder as evidenced by at least two MOV No. 2 by one MOV No. 2
by one MOV No. 1
 Performance Indicators

KRAs/ Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating

MFOs Domains Objectives
18. Set professional
development goals based on
the Philippine Professional
Standards for Teachers
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES
Timeline Weight QET 5 4 3 2 1 Actual Results Q E T Ave. Score
SY 5% Quality Updated professional Discussed progress on Set professional Accomplished the e-SAT No acceptable evidence
2021- development goals during professional development development goals based at the beginning of the
2022 Phase II of the RPMS goals with the rater during on e-SAT results as school year as evidenced
Cycle as evidenced by the mid-year review as evidenced by MOV No. 3 by MOV No. 4 7 5 5 0.25

MOV No. 1 evidenced by MOV No. 2

PLUS 19. Performed various related SY
FACTOR works / activities that 2021-
contribute to the
teaching_x0002_learning
process
10% Quality Performed at least 1
related work / activity that
2022 contributed to the
teaching_x0002_learning
process beyond the school
/ Community Learning
Center (CLC) as
evidenced by submitted
MOV
Performed at least 1
related work / activity that
contributed to the
teaching_x0002_learning
process within the school /
Community Learning
Center (CLC) as
evidenced by submitted
MOV
Performed at least 1
related work / activity that
contributed to the
teaching_x0002_learning
process within the learning
area / department as
evidenced by submitted
MOV
Performed at least 1 No acceptable evidence
related work / activity that was shown
contributed to the
teaching_x0002_learning
process within the class as
7 5 5 0.5
evidenced by submitted
MOV

100%
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.725
Descriptive Rating Outsanding
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

MARLYTTE V. PLAZA ROWENA O. ANGWAS MINERVA T. ALBIS, PhD

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 NUMERICAL
ADJECTIVAL RATING DESCRIPTION OF MEANING OF RATING
RATING

Performance represents an extraordinary level of achievement and commitment in terms of quality and
time, technical skills and knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and initiative. Employees at thus performance
5 Outstanding
level should have demonstrated exceptional job mastery in all major areas of responsiblity. Employee
achievement and contribution to the organization are of marked excelence.

Performance exceeded expectations. All goals, objectives and targets were achieved above the established
4 Very Satisfactory
standards.
Performance met expectation in terms of quality of work, efficiency and timeliness. The most critical annual
3 Satisfactory
goals are met.

2 Unsatisfactory Performance failed to meet expectations, and/or one or more of the most critical goals were not met.

Performance was consistently below expectations, and/or reasonable progress toward critical goals was not
1 Poor
made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.
This rating scale is based on the Civil Service Commision Memorandum Circular No. 06, series of 2012 that sets the guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the Strategic Performance
Management System (SPMS) in all government agencies.

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING SCALE DEFINITION

4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding 5 Role Model
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory 4 Consistently demonstrates
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory 3 Most of the time demonstrates
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory 2 Sometimes demonstrates
below 1.499 Poor 1 Rarely demonstrates
The overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments Competencies shall be monitored for developmental purposes. In
shall fall within the following adjectival ratings and shall evaluating the individual's demonstration of competencies, this rating
be in three (3) decimal points. scale shall apply.

Grievances and Appeals

1. A grievance Committee shall be created in each level of the The ratee, however, shall not be allowed to protest the performance ratings of co-employees.
organization to act as appeals board and final arbiter of all issues Ratings obtained by the ratee can used as basis for reference for comparison in appealing the
relating to the implementation of RPMS. individual performance rating.

2. The office performance assessment as discussed in the performance
review and evaluation phase shall be final and not appealable. Any
issue/appeal on the initial performance assessment of an office shall be
discussed and decided during the performance review conference.
4. The Grievance Committee shall decide on the appeals within one (1) month from receipt.
Appeals lodged at any grievance Committee shall follow the hierarchical jurisdiction of various
Grievance Committees within the agency. For example, the decision of the Division Grievance
Committee is appealable to the Regional Grievance Committee, which decision is in turn
appealable to the Central Office Grievance Committee.

3. Individual employees who feel aggrieved or dissatified with their final

performance ratings can file an appeal with the Grievance Committee at
their level within ten (10) working days from date of receipt of notice of 5. The decision of the Central Office Grievance Committee is final.
their final performance evaluation rating from the rater.
 PART II: COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES CORE SKILLS

Self-Management
5 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
5 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
5 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
5 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through grant chart, checklists, etc.) to
achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and other.
Professionalism and Ethics
5 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and
Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
5 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
5 Maintains a professional image: being trustwothy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
5 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs,
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
Result Focus
5 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
5 Avoids rework, mistakes and wasted through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
5 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consitently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work
in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervisio required.
5 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work method to improve performance.
Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently;
or improving quality, customer satisfaction, marale, without setting any specific goal.
Teamwork
4 Willingly does his/her share of resposibility.
5 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment
across the organization.
4 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
5 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
5 Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service
issues and concerns.
5 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
5 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on
DepEd Strategies and directions.
5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures
that will further enhance service delivery.
Innovation
5 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solution. Fosters new
ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational
efficiency).
5 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving
personal productivity to create higher value and results.
5 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
solutions.
5 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work
unit and organization.
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness
and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
Oral Communication
5 Follows instructions accurately.
4 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately.
4 Uses appropriate medium for the message.
4 Adjust communication style to others.
5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.
Written Communication
4 Knows the different written business communication formats used
in the Deped
4 Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and desciptive
report based on readily available information data with minimal spelling
or grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, etc.).
5 Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories, schedules,
notices, instructions) for specefic purposes.
5 Self- edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if necessary.
5 Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conscience and effectiveness in his/
her written communications.
Computer/ICT Skills
5 Prepares basic compositions (e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
graphics presentation using Word Processing and Excel.
5 Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on
a given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects
computer peripherals ( e.g. Printers, modems, multimedia projectors, etc).
5 Prepares simple presentation using Powerpoint.
5 Utilizes technologies to: access information to enhance professional
productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
and global professional networks.
5 Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity
and professional practice.

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.90
CORE SKILLS 4.67
OVERALL RATING 4.783
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 4.725 Outstanding

Rater- Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee MARLYTTE V. PLAZA Name of Superior ROWENA O. ANGWAS

Signature Signature
Date JULY 27, 2022 Date JULY 27, 2022

PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Strengths Developmental Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

A. FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCIES (Recommended Developmental

To engage myself in the community in

1.1 Applied knowledge of 3.1 Built relationships with building relationships with Internet Connection, School Head,
content within and across parents/guardians and the wider September 2021 to
parents/guardians & to other Parents/Guardian, & Resource
curriculum teaching areas school community to facilitate January 2022
professional and personal related Speaker
(PPST Indicator 1.1.2) involvement in the educative activities.
process. (PPST Indicator 6.2.2)
B. Core Behavioral Competencies (from Part III of e-SAT)

1. Demonstrates the values 6.4 Translates creative thinking into To engage myself in the trainings and
and behavior enshrined in September 2021 to Internet Connection, School Head, &
tangible changes and solutions that workshops through seminars and
the Norms and Conduct and improve the unit and organization. January 2022 Resource Speaker
webinars vis-à-vis RA 6713.
Ethical Standards for Public
Officials and employees (RA
6713).

MARLYTTE V. PLAZA ROWENA O. ANGWAS MINERVA T. ALBIS, PhD

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

 IPCRF RATING ENCODING FORM FOR PROFIIENT TEACHERS (Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-II)

Name of Employee MARLYTTE V. PLAZA Rater: ROWENA O. ANGWAS Region: XIII-Caraga

Position TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL I Division: Agusan del Sur
Employee ID #: 20170727113716400 Date of Review: JULY 27, 2022 District/Municipality: TRENTO II
Employment Status PERMANENT Rating Period AUGUST 2021-JULY 2022 School ID: 317409

COT/Supp. COT/Supp.
COT Mat./TRF 1 Mat./TRF 2 COT 3 COT 4 IPCRF Numerical Ratings
KRA/ Weight Weight per Indicator RPMS 5-pt RPMS 5-pt RPMS 5-pt RPMS 5-pt
Domain per KRA OBJECTIVES Objective No. Rating Scale Rating Scale Rating Scale Rating Scale AVE. Q E T Ave. Score Adjectival Rating
1 Objective 1 5% 1 7 5 7 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
1 Objective 2 5% 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
1 Objective 3 5% 2 7 5 7 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
1 20% Objective 4 5% 3 6 4 7 5 4.50 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
2 Objective 5 5% 4 7 5 6 4 4.50 4.00 4.00 0.20 Very Satisfactory
2 Objective 6 5% 5 7 5 7 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
2 Objective 7 5% 6 7 5 7 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
2 20% Objective 8 5% 7 7 5 7 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
3 Objective 9 5% 8 6 4 7 5 4.50 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
3 Objective 10 5% 9 7 5 7 5 5.00 4.50 4.50 0.23 Outstanding
3 Objective 11 5% 5.00 5.00 0.25 Very Satisfactory
3 20% Objective 12 5% 5.00 5.00 0.25 Very Satisfactory
4 Objective 13 5% 4.00 4.00 0.20 Very Satisfactory
4 Objective 14 5% 4.00 4.00 0.20 Very Satisfactory
4 Objective 15 5% 4.00 4.00 0.20 Very Satisfactory
4 Objective 16 5% 5.00 5.00 0.25 Very Satisfactory
4 Objective 17 5% 4.00 4.00 0.20 Very Satisfactory
4 30% Objective 18 5% 5.00 5.00 0.25 Outstanding
PLUS
FACTOR 10% Objective 19 10% 5.00 5.00 0.50 Outstanding
FINAL RATING 4.725
ADJECTIVAL RATING Outstanding

MARLYTTE V. PLAZA ROWENA O. ANGWAS MINERVA T. ALBIS, PhD

Ratee Rater Approving Authority