SBSD 2063 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

SEM 1 2021/2022

CASE STUDY RUBRIC (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT)

Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60

Completeness Complete in all respects; Complete in all respects; reflects Incomplete in many respects; Incomplete in most respects;
reflects all requirements all requirements reflects few requirements does not reflect reflections

Demonstrates a sophiscated Demonstrates Demonstrates an acceptable Demonstrates an inadequate

understanding of the topic(s) an accomplished understanding of understanding of the topic(s) understanding of the topic(s)
Understanding and issue(s) the topic(s) and issue(s) and issue(s) and issue(s)

Analysis, Presents an insightful and

Presents a thorough analysis of Presents a superficial analysis of
evaluation, and thorough analysis of all issues
most issues identified; includes some of the issues identified; Presents an incomplete
recommendations identified; includes all
most necessary financial omits necessary financial analysis of the issues identified
necessary financial
calculations calculations
calculations
Makes appropriate and Makes appropriate
Makes appropriate connections
powerful connections between but somewhat vague
between
the issues identified and the connections beteween the issues Makes little or no conenction
the issues identified and the
strategic concepts studied in and concepts studied in the between the issues identified
strategic concepts studied in the
the reading; demonstrates reading; demonstrates limited and the strategic concepts
reading; demonstrates good
complete command of the command of the strategic studied in the reading
command of the strategic concepts
strategic concepts and concepts and analytical tools
and analytical tools studied
analytical tools studied studied
Criterion 90-100
Supports diagnosis and
opinions with strong
arguments and evidence;
presents a balanced and
critical view; interpretation is
both reasonable and objective
Presents detailed,
realistic, and appropriate
recommendations clearly
supported by the information
presented and concepts from
the reading
Research Supplements case study with
relevant and extensive
research into the present
situation of the company,
clearly and thoroughly
documents all sources of
information
Writing
Writing demonstrates
mechanics
a sophicated clarity,
conciseness; includes
thorough details and relevant
data and information;
extremely well-organized
80-89
Suports diagnosis and opinions
with reasons and evidence;
presents
a fairly balanced view;
interpretation is both reasonable
and objective
Presents specific, realistics, and
appropriated recommendations
supported by the information
presented and concepts from the
reading
Supplements case study with
relevant research into the present
situation of the company;
documents all sources of
information
Writing is accomplished
in terms of clarity and conciseness
and contains only a few errors;
includes sufficient details and
relevant data and information;
well-organized
70-79 60-69 or below 60
Supports diagnosis and opinions Supports diagonsis
with limited reasons and and opinions with few reasons
evidence; presents a somewhat and little evience; argument is
one- side argument one-side and not objective
Presents realistic
Presents realistic
or appropriate
or appropriate recommendations
recommendations with little, if
supported by the information
any, support from the
presented and concepts from the
information presented and
reading
concepts from the reading
Supplements case study with
limited research into the present Supplements case
situation of the company; study, if at all, with incomplete
provides limited documentation research and documentation
of sources consulted
Writing lacks clarity
Writing is unfocused,
or conciseness and contains
rambling, or contains serious
numerous errors; gives
errors; lacks details and
insufficient detail and relevant
relevant details and
data and information; lacks
information; poorly organized
organization
Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60

APA guidelines Uses APA guidelines

Reflects incomplete knowledge
accurately and consistently to Uses APA guidelines with minor Does not use APA guidelines
of APA guidelines
cite sources violations to cite sources

Source: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (2019)