Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSportsMedPhysFitness-9742 ProofinPDF V2 2020-03-23
JSportsMedPhysFitness-9742 ProofinPDF V2 2020-03-23
net/publication/339659778
The effects of leucine and whey protein supplementation with eight weeks of
resistance training on strength and body composition
CITATIONS READS
2 813
3 authors:
Dušan Rakonjac
University of Novi Sad
8 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mila Vukadinović Jurišić on 20 May 2020.
© 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2020 mese;60(0):000–000
Online version at http://www.minervamedica.it DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.09742-X
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
B O D Y C O M P O S I T I O N , N U T R I T I O N A N D S U P P L E M E N TAT I O N
F
Jelena OBRADOVIĆ, Mila VUKADINOVIĆ JURIŠIĆ, Dušan RAKONJAC *
A
Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
O
IC
*Corresponding author: Dušan Rakonjac, Faculty of Sport and Phyisical Education, University of Novi Sad, Lovćenska 16, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
E-mail: rakonjac992@gmail.com
D
O
A B S T RAC T
E
BACKGROUND: In past few decades, supplementation has become very popular within professional and recreational athletes. Most interested
among supplements are protein and amino acids. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of leucine supplementation
in comparison to whey protein supplementation with placebo group on strength and body composition during 8 weeks of resistance training
M
program.
METHODS: Thirty male college athletes (mean age±SD =23.92±1.54 years) participated in this investigation and were randomly assigned to
one of three groups: whey protein (WP, N.=10), leucine (LEU, N.=10) or placebo (PLA, N.=10). The WP, LEU and PLA performed resistance
R
training for 8 weeks. Strength (1RM bench press, squat, shoulder press) and maximum pull-ups and body composition has been assessed and
data was analyzed with mixed-design analysis of variance (P≤0.01).
VA
RESULTS: The WP group achieved significantly greater (P≤0.01) increases in 1RM bench press than the LEU and PLA groups (+16 kg for WP;
+ 7.5 kg for LEU and + 5 kg for PLA). The LEU group achieved significantly greater gains (P≤0.01) in fat free mass, muscle mass and signifi-
cantly decreases (P≤0.01) in fat mass compared to WP and PLA groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Whey protein supplementation in male collegiate athletes during resistance training achieved greater increase in strength than
leucine and placebo groups, and leucine group achieved significantly greater improvement in body composition than whey protein and placebo
P
groups.
R
(Cite this article as: Obradović J, Vukadinović Jurišić M, Rakonjac D. The effects of leucine and whey protein supplementation with eight weeks of
resistance training on strength and body composition. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2020;60:000-000. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.09742-X)
Key words: Resistance training; Proteins; Amino acids, essential.
E
IN
Muscle protein synthesis must exceed muscle protein ca- synthesis in young subjects.8
tabolism, therefore amino acid availability is the key fac- Leucine is powerful stimulator of muscle protein syn-
tor in synthesis protein in muscles for hypertrophy.3 Sig- thesis, and it was recently shown that leucine conjunction
nificant decreases in amino acids have been found during with protein could further improve muscle protein syn-
resistance training, particularly leucine.4 However, oral thesis.9 Given these findings Coburn et al.3 found greater
consumption of leucine or other amino acids before and increases in the muscle strength among young men who
during resistance training, prevent the decline of amino had supplementation of whey protein (20 g) combined
acids in the muscles3, 5 and significantly increases muscle with leucine (6.2 g/d) compared to placebo group (26.2 g
of maltodextrin) after 8 weeks of resistance training. Fur- this dose has been reported to increase the muscle protein
thermore, supplementing with 40 g whey protein and 3 g synthesis in young subjects.8, 16 WP group consumed 1g/kg
of leucine during 10 weeks resistance training improve- whey protein for eight weeks of resistance training. PLA
ments body composition in male athletes.10 On the other group were consumed 10 g maltodextrin for eight weeks.
side, consuming only whey protein (35 g hydrolyzed) with Participants in all groups were subscribed for students
12 weeks resistance training increased skeletal muscle cafeteria University of Novi Sad during training protocol.
mass and upper limp lean soft tissue in older women.11 In Menu was constructed on recommendation by Ministry of
addition, Nabuco et al.12 found that whey protein supple- Republic of Serbia and assumes caloric value of three meals
mentation combined with 12-week resistance training in- was approximately 2200 kCal. The study was designed in
crease in intracellular water and lean soft tissue and also accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki17 of the World
reduction extracellular/intracellular water ratio in pre- Medical Association. The study was also reviewed and ap-
conditioned older women. On the population of younger proved by Ethics Committee of Faculty of Sport and Physi-
participants (13 male recreational body builders) Cribb et cal Education, University of Novi Sad.
F
al.13 demonstrated that whey isolate (1.5 g/kg body wt/d)
conjunction with 10-week of resistance training improve Testing protocol
strength, and decrease fat mass (-1.5±0.5kg). In addition, The participants underwent test assessments in an indoor
A
Burke et al..14 found increases in body composition (lean stadium. Before each testing, the participants performed
O
tissues mass) and muscular strength (knee extension peak standard 15 minutes warm-up. During the test, the air tem-
IC
torque) in males (18-31 years) who received whey protein perature ranged from 23 to 25 ºC. The testing began at 8
(1.2g/kg body mass/day) supplementation in combined AM and finished by 1PM (standard anthropometry (height
with 12-week resistance training. Given the results of re- and body mass), body composition and muscular strength).
D
cent studies,3, 10-14 it is possible that supplementing with All pre- and post-training testing procedures were com-
O
whey protein may be confounded by experimental factors pleted in the same order, spaced 8 weeks apart. The par-
such as resistance training mode, subjects, training status,
outcome measures and supplementation strategy.15 How-
E
ticipants were instructed not to be involved in strenuous
exercise for at least 24 hours before the strength testing
M
ever, no studies have examined separate effects of leucine and consume their normal pre training diet before the test-
compared with whey protein during resistance training on ing session. None of the subjects were injured 6 months
strength and body composition in young male collage ath-
R
effects of leucine (LEU) in comparison with whey protein who began 12-week training program (4-week familiariza-
(WP) and placebo (PLA) on strength and body composi- tion period and 8-week resistance training program) com-
tion during 8 weeks of resistance training program. pleted the study. All groups had similar (P>0.05) baseline
P
anthropometric characteristics.
R
Participants
Body height (BH) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm us-
Thirty young male college athletes (23.92±1.54 years) vol- ing Martin anthropometer (GPM in Switzerland), while
IN
unteered for this study, and they were untrained in resis- body mass (BW) was obtained to the nearest 0.1 kg using
tance training. Untrained was defined as not having partici- calibrated balance beam (Avery Ltd, Model 3306 ABV).
pated in a resistance training program for at least 90 days Body composition parameters were assessed by Bioelec-
M
before the start of the research. The subjects were randomly trical Impedance Analysis (BIA) (Maltron Bioscan 920
assigned to 1 of 3 groups: 1) leucine group (LEU, N.=10; – 2 (BioScan 920-2, Made in UK).18 Total body electri-
age 23±6; body height 177.6±4.2; body mass 78.8±3.12); cal impedance to an alternate current (800 μamp) with fre-
2) whey protein group (WP, N.=10; age 23±4; body height quencies 50 kHz was measured. Measurements were taken
178.3±5.0; body mass 79.5±3.36); and 3) placebo group followed by the standard testing manual of Maltron Inter-
(PLA, N.=10; age 23±4; body height 178.1±4.1; body mass national.19 The following parameters of the body composi-
78.3±2.98). LEU group orally consumed 5 g of leucine dis- tion are fat free mass (kg) (FFM [kg]), fat free mass (%)
solved in 200 mL every day for 8 weeks. In this particu- (FFM [%]), fat mass (kg) (FM [kg]), fat mass (%) (FM
lar study, 5 grams of leucine was used as a dose, because [%]), muscle mass (kg) (MM), total body water (TBW).
F
day and Friday). Briefly, split system has been used. First 20
A
Pre Post
ceps musculature and included six different exercise; third
O
training involved shoulder and legs musculature included Figure 1.—Bench press 1RM strength pre- and post-training with sup-
IC
plementation leucine (LEU), whey protein (WP), and placebo (PLA).
six different exercise.20 Qualified staff (teaching assistants) Values are means±SD.
attended the training sessions and monitored the work of the *Significant change from pre- to post-training (P≤0.01); †significantly
participants. The total time of one training session for each greater change in WP group than the LEU and PLA groups (P≤0.01).
D
participant was approximately 90-120 min (Supplementary
Digital Material 1: Supplementary Text File 1).
O
120
Statistical analysis
E 100
Squat 1RM (kg)
80
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS pro-
M
60
gram (version 21.0) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). De-
scriptive statistics and Shapiro-Wilks (normality of dis- 40
R
for group (WP, LEU and PLA) and time (initial vs. final) on
P
the dependent variables. ES was classified as follows: <0.2 tation leucine (LEU), whey protein (WP), and placebo (PLA).
Values are means±SD.
was defined as trivial; 0.2-0.6 was defined as small; 0.6- *Significant change from pre- to post-training (P≤0.01).
E
100
Squat 1RM (kg)
Results 80
M
60
Strength 40
analysis indicated that all groups increased strength with Figure 3.—Shoulder press 1RM strength pre- and post-training with
supplementation leucine (LEU), whey protein (WP), and placebo (PLA).
training (pre to post) (P≤0.01). After 8 weeks of training Values are means±SD.
1RM bench press was significantly greater in WP group *Significant change from pre- to post-training (P≤0.01).
12
10 changes in muscular strength after 4 weeks of the training
8
6
program in the group that consumed amino acids (0.4 g/kg
4 body weight with 27.2g of leucine per 100 g of amino ac-
2 ids) than group that consumed cellulose (placebo).22 Also,
0
increases in the muscle strength has been found among
LEU WP PLA
young men who underwent whey protein (20 g) combined
Pre Post
with leucine (6.2 g/d) supplementation compared to a pla-
Figure 4.—Pull-up max strength pre- and post-training with supplemen- cebo group (26.2 g of maltodextrin) after 8 weeks of resis-
tation leucine (LEU), whey protein (WP), and placebo (PLA).
tance training.3
F
Values are means±SD.
*Significant change from pre- to post-training (P≤0.01). This study demonstrated that leucine supplementation
(5 g/day) alone does not promote any additional effects
Body composition on muscle strength during 8 weeks of resistance training
A
compared with whey protein supplementation in young
There were significant interaction in groups x time for
O male adults. These results concur with results in other
IC
FFM (%), FM (kg) and MM (kg) (P<0.01). After 8 weeks studies.23-25 It can be noticed that supplementation with
of resistance training LEU group achieved greater increas- leucine (3 g/day) combined with 8 weeks of resistance
es in FFM (%), MM and decrease in FM (kg), FM (%) training does not improve muscular strength in untrained
D
compared to the WP and PLA groups. Also, the WP group young subjects.25 In one research, 7.5 g/day leucine sup-
O
achieved a higher FM (kg) and FM (%) reduction com- plementation has no additional effects on muscle strength
pared to the PLA group. In the WP, LEU and PLA groups,
there were no significant changes in TBW (Table I).
E
in healthy elderly men.23 Twelve weeks resistance train-
ing with 3 g leucine does not improve muscular strength
M
in previously untrained college-aged males.24 However,
Discussion supplementing with whey protein (1 g/kg) during 8 weeks
of resistance training has been shown to have a positive
R
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect on muscular strength compared to leucine with re-
VA
effects of leucine in comparison with whey protein and sistance training. It was observed a significant increase
placebo supplementation on strength and body composi- in 1RM bench press (+8.2 kg) in untrained healthy sub-
tion during eight weeks of resistance training in young jects supplementing with whey protein during 6 weeks of
male adults. The major findings of this study were that resistance training program.26 There was also noted im-
P
R
eight weeks of resistance training with leucine supplemen- provements in 1RM bench press after 8 weeks of resis-
tation cause improvements in body composition rather tance training combined with 48 g whey protein and 5.5
E
than whey protein and placebo groups. In addition, muscle g leucine.27 Based on the results obtained in this study, it
IN
Table I.—Body composition in the LEU (N.=10); WP (N.=10) and PLA (N.=10) groups during the pre and post period. Data presented
as mean±SD.
LEU WP PLA
Variable ES ES ES
M
can be concluded that whey protein in combination with and maltodextrin (placebo). Further research is needed to
resistance training achieved greater increase in strength determine the effects of different types of supplementa-
in comparison to leucine combined with resistance train- tion as well as of the timing of leucine supplementation on
ing. It is assumed that the changes in strength (1RM bench training adaptations.
press) in the WP group are due to the supplements. In addi-
tion, supplementing with combination of BCAA and whey
protein, before and immediately after resistance training References
sessions may provide added benefits in terms of increasing 1. Willoughby DS, Stout JR, Wilborn CD. Effects of resistance training
muscular strength.2, 14 and protein plus amino acid supplementation on muscle anabolism, mass,
and strength. Amino Acids 2007;32:467–77.
In this study, LEU group demonstrated a significant in-
2. Børsheim E, Tipton KD, Wolf SE, Wolfe RR. Essential amino acids
crease in FFM (%), MM (kg) and significant decrease FM and muscle protein recovery from resistance exercise. Am J Physiol En-
(kg) compared to WP and PLA groups. McAdam et al.28 docrinol Metab 2002;283:E648–57.
found significant reductions in fat mass in United States 3. Coburn JW, Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Malek MH, Beck TW, Cramer JT, et
F
al. Effects of leucine and whey protein supplementation during eight weeks
Army soldiers who consumed 77g/day whey protein. Con- of unilateral resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2006;20:284–91.
suming 5 g/day leucine supplements during 8 weeks of 4. Mero A. Leucine supplementation and intensive training. Sports Med
resistance training improves body composition in young 1999;27:347–58.
A
male adults. It is well known that leucine enhances the 5. Tipton KD, Rasmussen BB, Miller SL, Wolf SE, Owens-Stovall SK,
O
synthesis of protein in the muscles and regulates fat and
Petrini BE, et al. Timing of amino acid-carbohydrate ingestion alters ana-
IC
bolic response of muscle to resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol
metabolism glucoze.2 It is also considered that 3-5g of leu- Metab 2001;281:E197–206.
cine increases synthesis of protein in the muscles in young 6. Wolfe RR. Effects of amino acid intake on anabolic processes. Can J
Appl Physiol 2001;26(Suppl):S220–7.
subjects.8 Contradictory results showed that no additional
D
7. Dreyer HC, Drummond MJ, Pennings B, Fujita S, Glynn EL, Chinkes
effect of leucine supplementation (3 g/day) on muscle DL, et al. Leucine-enriched essential amino acid and carbohydrate in-
O
mass compared with the resistance training alone.25 It is gestion following resistance exercise enhances mTOR signaling and
protein synthesis in human muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
assumed that there is a difference, between Aguiar’s and
results in this study, in the amount of consumed leucine (3
E
2008;294:E392–400.
8. Wilkinson DJ, Hossain T, Hill DS, Phillips BE, Crossland H, Williams J,
M
g/day vs. 5 g/day), resistance training program, daily nutri- et al. Effects of leucine and its metabolite β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate on
human skeletal muscle protein metabolism. J Physiol 2013;591:2911–23.
tion and in participants.
9. Verreijen AM, Verlaan S, Engberink MF, Swinkels S, de Vogel-van den
R
Bosch J, Weijs PJ. A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched
Limitations of the study supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese
VA
11. Nabuco HC, Tomeleri CM, Sugihara Junior P, Fernandes RR, Cav-
in opposition to 7 doses of leucine per week). During the alcante EF, Antunes M, et al. Effects of whey protein supplementation
pre- or post-resistance training on muscle mass, muscular strength, and
study, the participants kept a diet diary, but the authors
E
Conclusions late and resistance training on strength, body composition, and plasma
glutamine. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2006;16:494–509.
The results of this investigation suggested that 8 weeks of 14. Burke DG, Chilibeck PD, Davidson KS, Candow DG, Farthing J,
resistance training program combined with 5 g/day leucine Smith-Palmer T. The effect of whey protein supplementation with and with-
out creatine monohydrate combined with resistance training on lean tissue
supplementation is beneficial on body composition (mus- mass and muscle strength. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2001;11:349–64.
cle mass, fat mass and fat free mass) in young male adults. 15. Davies RW, Carson BP, Jakeman PM. The Effect of Whey Protein
Additionally, 8 weeks of resistance training program Supplementation on the Temporal Recovery of Muscle Function Follow-
ing Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutri-
combined with whey protein supplementation increases ents 2018;10:221.
muscle strength (1RM bench press) compared to leucine 16. Churchward-Venne TA, Breen L, Di Donato DM, Hector AJ, Mitchell
CJ, Moore DR, et al. Leucine supplementation of a low-protein mixed 23. Verhoeven S, Vanschoonbeek K, Verdijk LB, Koopman R, Wodzig
macronutrient beverage enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis in young WK, Dendale P, et al. Long-term leucine supplementation does not
men: a double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;99:276–86. increase muscle mass or strength in healthy elderly men. Am J Clin
17. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Nutr 2009;89:1468–75.
principles for medical research involving human subjects; 2013 [Internet]. 24. Mobley CB, Haun CT, Roberson PA, Mumford PW, Romero MA,
Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of- Kephart WC, et al. Effects of Whey, Soy or Leucine Supplementation
helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-sub- with 12 Weeks of Resistance Training on Strength, Body Composi-
jects/ [cited 2020, Mar 19]. tion, and Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue Histological Attributes
18. Dey SK, Bandyopadhyay A, Jana S, Chatterjee S. Assessment of in College-Aged Males. Nutrients 2017;9:972.
body cell mass in Indian junior elite players (male) of different sports us- 25. Aguiar AF, Grala AP, da Silva RA, Soares-Caldeira LF, Pacagnelli
ing bioelectrical impedance analysis method. Medicina Sportiva. Journal FL, Ribeiro AS, et al. Free leucine supplementation during an 8-week
of Romanian Sports Medicine Society 2015;11:2533–40. resistance training program does not increase muscle mass and strength
19. Maltron International. Maltron Bioscan 920-2 operating and service in untrained young adult subjects. Amino Acids 2017;49:1255–62.
manual; 1999. p. 8-30. 26. Candow DG, Burke NC, Smith-Palmer T, Burke DG. Effect of
20. Maksimović D, Vukadinović M, Rakonjac D, Obradović J, Barišić V. whey and soy protein supplementation combined with resistance train-
Effects of heavy resistance training on morphological characteristics of ing in young adults. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2006;16:233–44.
young adults. Acta Kinesiol 2016;10:97–100. 27. Joy JM, Lowery RP, Wilson JM, Purpura M, De Souza EO, Wil-
F
21. Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive sta- son SM, et al. The effects of 8 weeks of whey or rice protein sup-
tistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports plementation on body composition and exercise performance. Nutr J
Exerc 2009;41:3–13. 2013;12:86.
A
22. Ratamess NA, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, Rubin MR, Gómez AL, French 28. McAdam JS, McGinnis KD, Beck DT, Haun CT, Romero MA,
DN, et al. The effects of amino acid supplementation on muscular per- Mumford PW, et al. Effect of whey protein supplementation on physi-
O
formance during resistance training overreaching. J Strength Cond Res
2003;17:250–8.
cal performance and body composition in army initial entry training
soldiers. Nutrients 2018;10:1248.
IC
Conflicts of interest.—The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.
Authors’ contributions.—Jelena Obradović wrote introduction; Mila Vukadinović Jurišić wrote the manuscript and conducted statistical analyses for Table I;
D
Dušan Rakonjac provided data for Table 1. All authors supervised training protocol and reviewed the final manuscript.
O
History.—Article first published online: February 27, 2020. - Manuscript accepted: January 27, 2020. - Manuscript revised: January 14, 2020. - Manuscript
received: February 6, 2019.
E
Supplementary data.—For supplementary materials, please see the HTML version of this article at www.minervamedica.it
M
R
VA
P
R
E
IN
M