Response

Summary:

IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far with developing their teaching portfolio and
that the participant will need to update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the remainder of the
IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Q2. Please enter the your name (teaching mentor):
Tracy Sprunger

Q1. Please enter the participant's first and last name:
Margo Whitehead

Q18. Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm submission):
mwhitehead4@iuhealth.org

Q3. Teaching Log Progress:
Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are given? Does the participant
appear to be on target to complete the minimum requirements for IPTeC?

IPTeC Requirements:

Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health professional students

Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation of or assessment of
learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs, presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor
alone without learners does NOT count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care activities, project
management, etc.

On track to meet all IPTeC requirements

Q4. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:
Exceeding didactic teaching requirements and on track for completion of the remaining. Margo will be facilitating a
Case Studies section for the Spring semester at Butler University and also plans to assist in some classes this
semester at Manchester.

Q5. Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and reflective. The participant
has considered his or her own personal approach to teaching and precepting.
Some improvement needed (detailed below)

Q6. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:
Ensure formatting is updated (some superscripts didn't translate). Margo has developed a well thought out teaching
philosophy which does include some specific actions she plans to incorporate into her teaching. I would recommend an
additional sentence or two relating her philosophy to experiential education.

Q7. Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases, presentations) that reflect his or her
teaching philosophy.
Yes

Q8. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:
Excellent start! Margo has included many examples and organized the example, feedback and reflections well.

Q9. Feedback Regarding Teaching:
The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from students, peers, and/or
preceptors.
Yes

Q10. Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:
N/A

Q11. Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she did exceptionally well during
the lecture, as well as opportunities for improvement. If a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the
participant adequately reflect what was done differently to make the lecture successful?
Yes

Q12. Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:
Excellent reflections! Great job indicating plans for improvement as your reviewers (for a job or IPTeC reviewers) will
look for growth as you continue to teach.

Q13. Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?
Yes

Q14. Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:
Great organization. As many documents that you can embed and still look organizes is helpful to the reviewer so they
don't have to download as much. It is a fine balance. Yours looks great! If you have the opportunity to embed your CV
or other feedback documents that may be helpful.

Embedded Data:
N/A