This document is a submission rating sheet for lawyer Joseph Benjamin Tagsa regarding a case titled RP v. GAITE with case number CA-GR CV NO. 103338 before the Court of Appeals. The pleading submitted was a Memorandum and was originally due on July 29th. The rating sheet evaluates the submission based on ten criteria related to appreciating the case facts and issues, accuracy, clarity, research, application of facts and law, and presentation of arguments. It also provides percentages for quality success indicators related to application of law, argument format, and grammar/style and includes a space to provide an overall quality rating.
This document is a submission rating sheet for lawyer Joseph Benjamin Tagsa regarding a case titled RP v. GAITE with case number CA-GR CV NO. 103338 before the Court of Appeals. The pleading submitted was a Memorandum and was originally due on July 29th. The rating sheet evaluates the submission based on ten criteria related to appreciating the case facts and issues, accuracy, clarity, research, application of facts and law, and presentation of arguments. It also provides percentages for quality success indicators related to application of law, argument format, and grammar/style and includes a space to provide an overall quality rating.
This document is a submission rating sheet for lawyer Joseph Benjamin Tagsa regarding a case titled RP v. GAITE with case number CA-GR CV NO. 103338 before the Court of Appeals. The pleading submitted was a Memorandum and was originally due on July 29th. The rating sheet evaluates the submission based on ten criteria related to appreciating the case facts and issues, accuracy, clarity, research, application of facts and law, and presentation of arguments. It also provides percentages for quality success indicators related to application of law, argument format, and grammar/style and includes a space to provide an overall quality rating.
This document is a submission rating sheet for lawyer Joseph Benjamin Tagsa regarding a case titled RP v. GAITE with case number CA-GR CV NO. 103338 before the Court of Appeals. The pleading submitted was a Memorandum and was originally due on July 29th. The rating sheet evaluates the submission based on ten criteria related to appreciating the case facts and issues, accuracy, clarity, research, application of facts and law, and presentation of arguments. It also provides percentages for quality success indicators related to application of law, argument format, and grammar/style and includes a space to provide an overall quality rating.
MFO 2 (Letter-Requests/Replies or documents which do not involve actual cases)
DATE ASSIGNED DATE SUBMITTED DATE FILED TIMELINESS RATING
ASG SECRETARIAT
MFO 3 (Pleadings)
PLEADING TYPE:
BRIEF MANIFESTATION & MOTION
MEMORANDUM x MR POSITION PAPER COMMENT
ORIG. DUE EXT. DUE # OF DATE SUBMITTED DATE FILED TIMELINESS
DAYS RATING EXT. July 29 - - ASG SECRETARIAT REMARKS:
1. Clear appreciation of the case and facts.
2. Accuracy in presenting the facts and issues of the case. 3. Clarity in the presentation of the facts of the case. 4. Accurate references and citations. 5. Thoroughness in identifying the issues to be discussed. 6. Clear-cut understanding and knowledge of applicable laws. 7. Thoroughness of research in support of the arguments. 8. In-depth application of the facts and the law. 9. Clear, coherent and concise presentation of arguments. 10. A determined effort to deal with difficult/challenging legal issues. ______________________________________________________________________________