Rating Sheet11.12.15

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

SUBMISSION RATING SHEET

NAME OF LAWYER: AS III JOSEPH BENJAMIN TAGSA

CASE TITLE: RP v. GAITE

CASE NO: CA-GR CV NO. 103338

COURT OF APPEALS

MFO 2 (Letter-Requests/Replies or documents which do not involve actual cases)

DATE ASSIGNED DATE SUBMITTED DATE FILED TIMELINESS RATING


ASG
SECRETARIAT

MFO 3 (Pleadings)

PLEADING TYPE:

BRIEF MANIFESTATION & MOTION


MEMORANDUM
x MR POSITION PAPER
COMMENT

ORIG. DUE EXT. DUE # OF DATE SUBMITTED DATE FILED TIMELINESS


DAYS RATING
EXT.
July 29 - - ASG
SECRETARIAT
REMARKS:

1. Clear appreciation of the case and facts.


2. Accuracy in presenting the facts and issues of the case.
3. Clarity in the presentation of the facts of the case.
4. Accurate references and citations.
5. Thoroughness in identifying the issues to be discussed.
6. Clear-cut understanding and knowledge of applicable laws.
7. Thoroughness of research in support of the arguments.
8. In-depth application of the facts and the law.
9. Clear, coherent and concise presentation of arguments.
10. A determined effort to deal with difficult/challenging legal issues.
______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

Quality Success Indicators Percentage Rating


Application of the law to the relevant facts 30%
through deduction and analogy.
Use of format for arguments. 30%
Grammar and style. 40%

QUALITY RATING : ____________________

You might also like