TGN 1 - Level 2 - Designing A Steel Beam

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Note 1 Level 2
www.thestructuralengineer.org

Technical TheStructuralEngineer 25
Technical Guidance Note January 2013

Designing a steel beam


Introduction ICON W Principles of steel
This Technical Guidance Note is the first of the Level 2 guides. Guides in LEGEND beam design

this next level build on what has been described previously in the Level 1
series. The topics covered at Level 2 are of a more complex nature as they W Applied practice
typically deal with the design of elements as opposed to core concepts
such as loading and stability. As such, the amount of prior knowledge the
reader is assumed to have is at the very least the contents of relevant Level W Worked example
1 Technical Guidance Notes.

The subject of this guide is the design of non-composite steel beams to BS W Further reading
EN 1993-1-1 – Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1-1: General
Rules for Buildings. It covers both restrained and unrestrained rolled steel
‘I’ and ‘H’ beam sections. It does not encompass the design of ‘T’ sections, W Web resources
hollow sections, castellated beams, angles and welded sections.

Principles of steel Description Variable


beam design b Width of flange

The key to understanding the design of h Depth of beam


steel beams is to determine whether or
not the beam is restrained against lateral z-z Minor axis
torsional buckling. This subject is covered
in the Level 1 (No. 16) Technical Guidance y-y Major axis
Note: Lateral torsional buckling. If a beam is
restrained, all that needs to be checked is d Depth of web
the bending moment and shear resistance
of the beam as well as serviceability limits
tw Thickness of web
against the applied load/actions. All
tf Thickness of flange
of which are based on the beam’s core
properties. r Radius of root fillet between web and flange
If the beam is unrestrained along any part Wpl,y Plastic section modulus about the y-y axis
of its length however, then there is a risk
it will fail due to lateral torsional buckling. Wel,y Elastic section modulus about the y-y axis
To address this, Eurocode 3 establishes
a reduction factor that is applied to the iz Radius of gyration about the z-z axis
bending moment resistance of the beam.
Calculating this factor is the cornerstone A Cross sectional area of the beam
of unrestrained steel beam design within
Eurocode 3. Iyy Second moment of area about the y-y axis

Frequent references will be made on the


section variables throughout this guide. You
N Figure 1
Beam section notation used in Eurocode 3

are advised therefore to examine Figure 1


for the definition and nomenclature of these grades of steel most commonly used in strength. Table 1 defines what the yield
variables. the construction industry within the UK. strength should be for the most common
S275’s nominal yield strength is 275 N/mm2 ranges of thicknesses found in open rolled
Steel material properties and Grade S355’s nominal yield strength steel sections. These figures are based on
The density of steel is 7850 kg/m3 and the is 355 N/mm2. The actual yield strength is the values given in BS EN 10025 Hot Rolled
Young’s Modulus (E) is 210,000 N/mm2. dependent on the maximum thickness of Products of Structural Steels, which is the
an element within a steel section, as the product standard for rolled steel sections of
S275 and S355 are the two strength thicker the element the lower the yield various sub-grades.

TSE13_25-29.indd 25 19/12/2012 10:13



Note 1 Level 2

26 TheStructuralEngineer Technical
January 2013 Technical Guidance Note

Table 1: Yield strength fy vs. element thickness

Yield strength fy for Yield strength fy for element Yield strength fy for element
Grade element thickness thickness > 16mm thickness > 40mm
< 16mm (N/mm2) and < 40mm (N/mm2) and < 63mm (N/mm2)

S275 275 265 255

S355 355 345 335

Classification of beam sections of the elements must lie. These limits are
Clause 5.5.2 in BS EN 1993-1-1 groups steel further modified based on the yield strength
beams into four classifications. These of the material; this is defined via
classifications are based on a steel beam coefficient ε thus:
section’s resistance to suffering from a local
failure due to buckling: 2
235 N/mm
f =
Class 1/‘Plastic’ These sections can form fy
a plastic hinge when a bending moment is
applied to them without suffering from local Where:
buckling failure. ε is the coefficient for section classification
fy is the yield strength of the steel, based on
Class 2/‘Compact’ These sections cannot element thickness
properly develop a plastic hinge as their
ability to rotate is limited before local Table 2 indicates the limiting values for
buckling failure occurs. various classes of section for both of the
elements identified in Figure 2. If any of the
Class 3/‘Semi-Compact’ These are ratios go beyond those stated in Table 2 the
sections that can withstand elastic stresses, section is considered to be in the Class 4
specifically at the extreme fibres of the category.
section, but cannot form a plastic hinge.
This has the effect of negating their plastic
Table 2: Limiting values of geometries
bending moment capacity.
for section classes 1-3
Class 4/‘Slender’ Sections that will fail
Class Web Flange
due to local buckling prior to the point of
yield stress. Their plastic bending capacity 1 c/t ≤ 72ε c/t ≤ 9ε
therefore is non-existent.
2 c/t ≤ 83ε c/t ≤ 10ε
When determining the classification of a
section, typically two parts of a rolled steel 3 c/t ≤ 124ε c/t ≤ 14ε
beam section are considered. For a simply
supported beam, these are the edge of
the top flange and the web, both of which Shear capacity
are subjected to compression stress due Typically the component of the beam that
to bending. Figure 2 indicates where these takes the majority of the applied shear
elements lie within a rolled steel beam section. force is its web. There are instances where
stiffeners are installed in order to support
Table 5.2 in Clause 5.5 of BS EN 1993-1-1 high shear loads, but this is very much the
defines the limits within which the geometry exception rather than the rule.

"Guides in this
next level build
on what has
been described
previously in the
E Figure 2
Elements
of a rolled steel Level 1 series"
beam that
determine its
classification

TSE13_25-29.indd 26 19/12/2012 10:13


www.thestructuralengineer.org

27

All steel beams must satisfy the following fy Lateral torsional buckling
expression: M c,Rd = W y Clause 6.3.2.3 of BS EN 1993-1-1 describes
c M0 how the value of χLT is related to the
V Ed
# 1 Where: slenderness of the beam. This is related
V c, Rd
Wy is the major axis section modulus of the to the distance between restraints to the
Where: beam based on its classification: element of the beam that is subject to
VEd is the applied shear force Wy = Wpl,y (Plastic section modulus) compression. For simply supported beams it
Vc,Rd is the design shear resistance for Class 1 or 2 is its upper-most flange. This is known as the
Wy = Wel,y (Elastic section modulus) non-dimensional slenderness ( m LT ) and is
In the case of Class 1 and 2 rolled steel for Class 3 defined thus:
beams, the design shear resistance is Wy = Weff,y (Minimum effective section W y fy
designated as Vpl,RD and is defined in Clause modulus) for Class 4 m LT =
6.2.6, equation 6.18 of BS EN 1993-1-1 as: fy is the yield strength of the steel, based on M cr
element thickness Where:
A v (f y / 3)
V pl,Rd = γM0 is the partial factor for the resistance of Wy and fy are as per previous definitions
c M0 cross-sections, which in the UK is set at 1.0 Mcr is the elastic critical moment for lateral
Where: torsional buckling, which is based on the
Av is the cross section area of the part of the The bending moment resistance should be slenderness of the beam
beam that is resisting shear. For ‘I’ and ‘H’ reduced if the applied shear force is more
sections this can conservatively be taken to than half of the plastic shear resistance Mcr is not defined within Eurocode 3, which
be htw, which is the cross sectional area of the of the beam. Where it exceeds this value, offers no guidance in calculating its value.
web and the thickness of the flange (Figure 3). Clause 6.2.8 of BS EN 1993-1-1 applies. This There are however, many direct methods
places a modification factor against the yield for calculating slenderness, the most simple
For all other classes of beam sections, you are strength, thus: of which is described in this guide.
referred to Clause 6.2.6 (4) of BS EN 1993-1-1
for determining their design shear resistance. Modified yield strength = (1-ρ)fy Slenderness
For ‘H’ and ‘I’ sections it is possible to
Where: use simplified methods to calculate the

` 2V - 1j
2
relative slenderness of the beam. The most
Ed conservative method is defined in Table 1.1
t =
V pl,Rd of NCCI: Determination of non-dimensional
slenderness of I and H sections SN002a-
This modified yield strength is then inserted EN-EU. It is based on applying the following
into the calculation that determines bending equations that vary depending on the grade
moment resistance. of steel being used:

For Class 4 sections you are required to For S275 Grade steel:

:L D
follow the guidance given in BS EN 1993-1-
5 – Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures
– Part 1-5: Plated Structural Elements. Class iz
m LT =
4 sections are not found in rolled ‘I’ and 96
‘H’ elements and are therefore beyond the For S355 Grade steel:
scope of this guide.
:L D
In the case of an unrestrained portion of iz
m LT =
a beam, a factor is applied to the bending 85
moment resistance (Mb,Rd) that takes into Where:
account the risk of lateral torsional buckling. L is the distance between restraints to the
This is described Clause 6.3.2.1 (3) of BS EN compression flange of the beam
N Figure 3
Approximate extent of web
resisting shear in a steel beam
1993-1-1, in equation 6.55 as: iz is the radius of gyration about the minor
fy axis of the beam
Clause 6.2.6 of BS EN 1993-1-1 has a more M b, Rd = | LT W y
accurate equation that takes into account c M1 While valid, this method is very conservative
the radii of the root fillet to the web-to- Where: as it ignores the bending moment diagram
flange interface of the ‘H’ and ‘I’ sections. Wy is the major axis section modulus of the of the beam and can therefore result in
These can be used if you are finding it beam based on its classification and is the oversized members. There is however,
difficult to satisfy the shear resistance same for restrained beams a more accurate yet complex method
requirements. fy is the yield strength of the steel, based on that does take into account the bending
element thickness moment diagram and is described in
Bending moment resistance γM1 is the partial factor for resistance of NCCI: Determination of non-dimensional
of steel beams members subject to instability, which in slenderness of I and H sections SN002a-
BS EN 1993-1-1 defines the bending moment the UK is set at 1.0 EN-EU. It is strongly recommended that
resistance of restrained steel beams (Mc,Rd) χLT is the reduction factor that takes into you examine this method in order to design
in clause 6.2.5(2) as: account lateral torsional buckling more efficiently sized steel beams.

TSE13_25-29.indd 27 19/12/2012 10:13



Note 1 Level 2

28 TheStructuralEngineer Technical
January 2013 Technical Guidance Note

There are further methods in determining Serviceability


Mcr described in the Non-Contradictory The vertical deflection limits for steel beams "Class 4 sections
Complimentary Information website for
structural steelwork.
can be found in the Clause NA.2.23 of the UK
National Annexe to BS EN 1993-1-1. Table 3 are not found in
Once the non-dimensional slenderness is
is based on these stated limits, which are for
the deflection due to unfactored imposed rolled ‘I’ and ‘H’
established, the value of χLT is determined
using equation 6.57 of Clause 6.3.2.3 of BS
loads/variable actions only.
elements and are
EN 1993-1-1 thus:
Table 3: Vertical deflection to steel beams beyond the scope
| LT =
U LT +
1
2 2
U LT - b m LT
Beam type/structure Deflection limit of this guide"
U LT = 0.5 61 + a LT ( m LT - m LT, 0) + b m LT@
2 Cantilever Length/180

Where: Beams supporting Eurocode 0.


The values of β and m LT,0 are defined as brittle finishes
Span/360 Applied practice
0.4 and 0.75 respectively, as described in
Clause NA.2.17 of NA to BS EN 1993-1-1.
All other conditions Span/200 The applicable codes of practice for
αLT is the imperfection factor and is found designing steel beams are as follows:
in Table 6.3 of BS EN 1993-1-1, which reads Purlins and To suit cladding
against the steel beam’s buckling curve. cladding rails system BS EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3: Design of
Steel Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules for
The buckling curves are labelled ‘a’ to ‘d’ Buildings
and can be found in Clause NA.2.17 of NA In addition to deflection, it is prudent to
to BS EN 1993-1-1. The buckling curve is check the vibration of the beam i.e. its BS EN 1993-1-1 UK National Annex to
dependent upon the h/b ratio of the beam dynamic response. Technical Guidance Note Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures –
section. No. 11, Level 1 explains how to do this. Part 1-1: General Rules for Buildings

Worked example

A simply supported, unrestrained steel beam spanning 8m is supporting another steel


beam in the middle of its span. The ultimate load from this beam is 500 kN, while the
serviceability load due to variable actions is 200 kN. The floor structure consists of one
way spanning precast concrete planks with a screed and tiled finish. These planks span
parallel to the steel beam and hence do not provide lateral restraint. Determine what size
of beam is required to support this load, assuming the steel grade to be S355.

TSE13_25-29.indd 28 19/12/2012 10:13


www.thestructuralengineer.org

29

Glossary and
further reading

Reduction factor – A variable applied to


the bending moment resistance of a beam
due to the fact that it is unrestrained and
hence subject to lateral torsional buckling.

Rolled steel section – A steel element


that is cast to a pre-set size and not built up
from separate plate elements.

Section classification – A categorisation


of steel elements that is based on the
element’s ability to develop a plastic hinge
when placed under load.

Further Reading
The Institution of Structural Engineers
(2010) Manual for the Design of Steelwork
Building Structures to Eurocode 3 London:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Steel Construction Institute (2009) Steel


Building Design. Worked Examples for
Students (P387) Ascot, Berkshire: SCI

The Institution of Structural Engineers


(2012) ‘Principles of design’ The Structural
Engineer Vol. 90 (1) pp. 40-41

The Institution of Structural Engineers


(2012) ‘Derivation of dead loads’ The
Structural Engineer Vol. 90 (1) pp. 43-45

The Institution of Structural Engineers


(2012) ‘Derivation of imposed loads’ The
Structural Engineer Vol. 90 (2) pp. 46-48

The Institution of Structural Engineers


(2012) ‘Derivation of wind load’ The
Structural Engineer Vol. 90 (2) pp. 49-52

The Institution of Structural Engineers


(2012) ‘Derivation of snow load’ The
Structural Engineer Vol. 90 (3) pp. 22-24

The Institution of Structural Engineers


(2012) ‘Lateral torsional buckling’ The
Structural Engineer Vol. 90 (16) pp. 28-30

Eurocode 0.
Web
resources

Tata Steel Interactive ‘Blue Book’:


www.tatasteelconstruction.com/en/design_
guidance/the_blue_book/

Non-Contradictory Complimentary
Information website for structural steelwork:
www.steel-ncci.co.uk/

TSE13_25-29.indd 29 19/12/2012 10:13

You might also like