Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prelims
Prelims
CHAPTER 1
WEEK 1-2: Historical Accounts and Evolution of Criminology
Criminology is the scientific study of criminals, criminal behavior, and its causes.
Criminologists attempt to build theories that explain why crimes occur and test those
theories by observing behavior. Criminological theories help shape society’s response
to crime both in terms of preventing criminal behavior and responding to it after it
occurs.
Criminology
● study of crimes, criminals, and criminal behavior (Webster)
● the body of knowledge regarding crime as a social phenomenon (Edwin H.
Sutherland)
● a scientific and humanistic study of the social process of identifying crimes,
criminals , and the compatible solutions (Mannle and Herschel)
The discipline of criminology has evolved in three phases, beginning in the 18th century.
Although crime and criminals have been around for as long as societies have existed,
the systematic study of these phenomena did not begin until the late 1700s. Prior to that
time, most explanations of crime equated it with sin — the violation of a sacred
obligation.
Theological Criminology
The first phase involved when scholars first distinguished crime from sin, they made
possible explanations of criminal behavior that were not theological (religious). This,
Modern Criminology
The second phase, which began in the 19th century, is referred to as modern
criminology. During this era, criminology distinguished itself as a subspecialty within the
emerging disciplines of psychology, sociology, and economics. Scholars formed
criminological societies and founded criminology journals. Criminologist in turn, allowed
for the dispassionate, scientific study of why crime occurs. The development of this
study is now known as the era of classical criminology.
conducted empirical tests (observations or experiments) of their theories, rather than
relying solely on speculation, and consequently developed a wide range of theories.
Independent Criminology
The third phase, beginning in the second half of the 20th century, may best be called
independent criminology. During this period, criminology began to assert its
independence from the traditional disciplines that spawned it. In Western Europe, the
United States, and Canada, criminologists expanded their
professional associations and published an increasing number of journals. A number of
universities developed graduate programs in criminology: Criminological theories have
become more multidisciplinary (spanning various fields of study) because independent
criminologists seek to understand
crime itself rather than study crime as one aspect of an overall sociological or
psychological theory.
EVOLUTION OF CRIMINOLOGY
Note: In 1885, Italian law professor Rafaelle Garofalo coined the Italian term
criminologia. The French anthropologist Paul Topinard used it for the first time in French
“Criminologie” around the same time. The word “Criminology” was also first used by
Paul Topinard.
- the Italian law professor Raffaele Garofalo coined the term criminologia in 1885.
- the French anthropologist Paul Topinard used the term criminologie in 1887.
- The word “Criminology” was derived from the Latin word “Krimen” which can be
translated to offense, crime or accusation and “Logos” - which means “to study”.
WHAT IS CRIMINOLOGY?
▪ Criminology is the scientific study of criminals, criminal behavior and its causes.
▪ Criminology, is a body of knowledge regarding delinquency and crime as a social
phenomenon.
•Generally, it is not an absolute science because its principles have not yet
acquired universal validity and acceptance. However, it is a science in itself
when under the following nature:
IS CRIMINOLOGY A SCIENCE?
*BRANCHES OF CRIMINOLOGY
▪ A. CRIMINAL DEMOGRAPHY- study of the relationship between
criminality and population.
▪ B. CRIMINAL ECOLOGY- study of the relationship between environment
and criminality.
▪ C. CRIMINAL PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY- study of criminality in
relation to physical constitution of men.
▪ D. CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY- study of human behavior in relation to
criminality.
▪ E. CRIMINAL PSYCHIATRY- study of human mind in relation to
criminality.
▪ F. CRIMINAL VICTIMOLOGY - deals with the victimization of crime which
is considered by political society as any act or omission punishable by law.
(Victimless Crimes)
NATURE OR CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMINOLOGY
Criminology is:
1. An Applied Science - It is useful. Sciences like anthropology, psychology,
sociology and other natural sciences may be applied in the study of the causes of
crime while chemistry, medicine, physics, mathematics, etc. may be utilized in
crime detection.
2. A Social science - In as much as crime is a societal creation and it exists in
society, its study must be considered as part of social science.
3. Dynamic - The progress of criminology is concordant with the advancement of
other sciences that have been applied to it. Criminology changes as social
condition changes.
4. Nationalistic - The study of crime must always be in relation with the existing
criminal law with in the territory. The study of crime and/or criminology must
always conform to the existing criminal law of the land.
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
In studying Criminology, there are three important components namely:
1. Criminal Etiology
● the scientific analysis of the causation of crimes and the criminal behavior
● Criminal etiology involved the application of scientific analysis of the causes of
crime. An individual perpetrating a crime had no single reason; hence, there is no
single and only explanation of causes of crimes. A different theory has evolved in
C=T+S
R
Fault /Culpa
– When the wrongful act results from imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight or
lack of skill.
CHAPTER 2
Scientific Method
A method of discovering knowledge about the natural world based on making falsifiable
predictions (hypotheses), testing them empirically, and developing peer-reviewed theories that
best explain the known data.
The scientific method was first outlined by Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) to provide logical,
rational problem solving across many scientific fields.
Social Science
Sciences concerned with the social behavior of individuals and groups (e.g., sociology,
anthropology, or psychology) and that are often considered more subjective due to the focus of
study.
Natural Science
Sciences concerned with predicting and describing natural phenomena (e.g., biology, physics, or
chemistry), using systematic data collection and performing controlled experiments.
VERIFIABILITY
PREDICTABILITY
Predictability in a scientific theory implies that the theory should enable us to make predictions
about future events. The precision of these predictions is a measure of the strength of the theory.
FALSIFIABILITY
If the results are not statistically significant, this means that the researchers’ hypothesis was not
supported.
FAIRNESS
Fairness implies that all data must be considered when evaluating a hypothesis. A researcher
cannot pick and choose what data to keep and what to discard or focus specifically on data that
support or do not support a particular hypothesis. All data must be accounted for, even if they
invalidate the hypothesis.
6. Draw conclusions and repeat–the scientific method is never-ending, and no result is ever
considered perfect
– He stated that people by nature tried to perform good acts. Sin or crime took place when their
power to reason failed.
Plato
-stated that certain social and political factors encouraged crime.
Aristotle
- stressed the ability of the law to improve social condition, the distribution of the right and
requirements for strict obedience to the state.
Subjective Approaches
1. Anthropological – deals with the study of physical characteristics of an individual
offender with non – offenders in an attempt to discover differences covering criminal
behavior.
2. Medical Approach – Application of medical examination for the explanation of mental
and physical condition of the individual prior and after the commission of the crime. 3.
Biological Approach – according to Taft, heredity is one major factor why a person
commits crime
4. Physiological Needs – Maslow explained that the deprivation of the primary needs is a
strong factor in the commission of crime
6. Psychiatric – this approach explains that mental disease is the reason why a person
violates norms and laws of the land
7. Psychoanalytical – According to Freud, the imbalance condition of Id, Ego and Superego
causes deviation of the individual to the norms of society
Objective Approaches
1. Geographical Approach
– Considers topography, natural resources, Geographical location, and climate lead
an individual to commit crime. Founder Quetelet, “Thermic Law of Delinquency”,
crimes against person prevail in the South Pole and during warm season while
crimes against property predominate in the north pole and cold countries.
2. Ecological Approach
– according to Park, this is concerned with the biotic grouping of men resulting to
migration, competition, social discrimination, division of labor and social conflict as
factors to crime.
3. Economic Approach
– Merton believed that poverty or economic difficulty pushes a person to commit
crime in order to support his needs.
4. Socio-Cultural
– Cohen affirms that institutions, education, politics and religion are major factors in
the commission of crimes.
5. Biological Factors
-Men as living organism have been the object of several studies which has the
purpose of determining the causes of crimes
● Physiognomy
-this is the study of the relationship between the facial features and human conduct
of a person in relation to his crime.
● Phrenology or Craniology
-This is the study of external formation of the skull that indicates the conformation
of the brain and the development of its various parts in relation to the behavior of
the criminal advocated by Franz Joseph Gall & Spurzheim.
6. Heredity Factors
-The common household expressions like “it is in the blood” and “like father like son” are
usually heard and said whenever there are several members of the family who are criminals.
The old biblical injunction that “the sins of the fathers shall be visited on the sons”.
Kallikak Family Tree
Martin Kallikak was a soldier of the American revolutionary war and while stationed in
a small village he met and had illicit relations with a feeble – minded girl. About
489descendants from this lineage where traced which included 143 feeble-minded and
only 46 were normal. Thirty-six were illegitimate, 3 were epileptic, 3 criminals, 8 kept
brothels and 82 died in infancy.
At the closed of the war, Martin Kallikak, Sr. returned to his home and married a quaker
of good family. Out of this marriage, 4, 967 of the descendants has been traced and all but
I was convicted of religious offense, 15 died in infancy and no one become criminal or
epileptic.
The Juke family consisted of 6 girls some of whom were illegitimate. One of the six
sisters, Ada Juke was known as “Margaret”, the mother of criminals. Dugdale traced the 1,
200 descendants for 75 years from its origin and found 280 as paupers, 140-criminals, 60
habitual thieves, 300 infants prematurely born, 7 murders, 50 prostitutes, 440
contaminated with sexual diseases, and 30 were prosecuted for bastardly. Studied by
Richard Dugdale.
• Sir Jonathan Edwards Family Tree
Sir Jonathan Edwards was a famous preacher during the colonial period. When his
family tree was traced, none of the descendants was found to be criminal. On the other
hand, many become presidents of the United States, governor, members of Supreme
Court, famous writers, preachers and teachers.
CHAPTER 3
The following are the basic theories in Criminology used in explaining the etiology
of crime, criminal behavior, deviant behavior, and human behavior.
● PRE-CLASSICAL THEORY:
▪ Demonological Theory — it maintains that criminal behavior was believed to
be the result of evil spirits and demons something of natural force and
controls behavior.
− During the medieval period, the most common explanations for the commission
of wrong act is said to be caused by the devil. From this account, method uses
in the determination of truth (trial) were arbitrary and unreasonable. Although
through the Middle Ages (1200-1600), superstition and fear of satanic
possession dominated the thinking. People who violated
social norms or religious practices were believed to be witches or possessed
by demons. The prescribed method for dealing with the possessed was
burning at stake, a practiced that survived into the 17th Century.
th
Pre 20 Century (1738-1798)
FOUNDATIONAL THEORIES IN CRIMINOLOGY:
• Classical Theory — it asserts that human beings are endowed with absolute
free will to choose right from wrong. Human beings are fundamentally
rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will coupled with
rational -choice.
• Pain and suffering are the two central determinants of human behavior
• - It was introduced by Cesare Beccaria (Essay on Crimes and Punishment)
and Jeremy Bentham (Utilitarian Hedonism)
• The basis of criminal liability is human free will and the purpose of
penalty is retribution
Theory of ATAVISM
• Lombroso was highly influence with the Theory of Evolution of Charles
Darwin which led him to the development to theory of ATAVISM –
criminals were throwbacks to an earlier and more primitive evolutionary
period. Such criminals could be identified by certain physical stigmata,
outward appearance particularly in the face.
• ¬ An Italian, born 1856, author of “The Theory of Imputable and the Denial
of Free Will” published in 1878.
• ¬ He agreed with Lombroso on the biological basis of Criminal’s behavior but
his interest in socialism led him to recognize the importance of social,
economic, and political determinants.
• ¬ His greatest contribution was his attack on the classical doctrine of free
will, which argued that, criminals should be held morally responsible for their
crimes because they must have a rational decision to commit these acts.
• ¬ He believed that criminals could not be held morally responsible because
they did not choose to commit crimes, but rather were driven to commit
crimes by conditions in their lives.
Raffaele Garofalo
• ¬ He treated the roots of the criminals’ behavior not to physical features but to
their psychological equivalent, which he referred to as moral anomalies.
• ¬ He rejected the doctrine of freewill.